Department of state docs show Laura Silsbys plan to go to Haiti to "rescue" children and bring them to the New Life Childrens refuge in the Dominican Republic which was founded by her.

89  2018-02-02 by 4thdimensionalshift

Here are the Department of State documents that are concerning the Haiti child trafficking "rescue" mission.

The progression of events becomes clear in the titles of the documents of note:

Document 1: New Life children's refuge: Haitian orphan rescue mission

Document 2: Haiti prosecutors urge prison for US missionary (Laura silsby)

Document 3: (email from Huma Abedin to Hillary Clinton) Haiti drops kidnapping charge for missionaries

The New Life children's refuge "Provide a loving Christian home-like environment for up to 200 children, both boys and girls, initially focused on ages 0 - 10 years old, later expanding to include teens up to age 16"

Here is the case details on Wikipedia. Some interesting things from the article:

"On January 29, 2010, a group of ten American Baptist missionaries from Idaho attempted to cross the Haiti-Dominican Republic border with 33 Haitian children, most of whom were not orphans and had families."

"In the days following the group's initial arrest, Dominican Jorge Puello falsely portrayed himself as the group's lawyer. Puello later acknowledged that he is under investigation for sex trafficking in El Salvador and wanted in the United States for smuggling people across the Canada–US border."

Here is the team that went to Haiti: "Haiti Team: Laura Silsby, Charisa Coulter, Carla Thompson, Nicole & Corrinna Lankford Paul Thompsons Team from East Side Baptist Church, Twin Falls"

I will be researching these names and organizations further, but this is a good start for anyone doubting the Laura Silsby child trafficking story.

24 comments

Keep up the good work.

Child traffickers escape justice because those whom they are trafficked TO are far too powerful to face justice.

Couldn't of said it better myself.

COULDN'T HAVE

Not too powerful to stop a bullet.

Where the fuck is Frank Castle!?!?!

Some information you may be interested in, old copy pasta

I assume you're talking about this email.

First off, we need some context.

Pizzagate investigators cite this document as proof that "One of the first things the Clintons did when they took over the scene in Haiti was to have Bill get Laura off the hook."

But it's not true according to their own link. The linked document says:

Clinton brokered the release of all the missionaries, except for the group leader, Laura Silsby.

Interesting non-essential side note, if you look at this shameful, monumentally embarrassing tweet from Wikileaks where they link to an early pizzagate thread on the_youknowwho, you can see the original formulation was that "One of the first things Hillary did when she took over the scene in Haiti was get Laura Silsby off the hook..." This has been edited to say "the Clintons" instead of "Hillary" because the linked 46-page document doesn't even mention Hillary's name. And besides, "the Clintons took over the scene?" The outcome for Silsby was determined by a trial with a judge and lawyers and testimony from the parents of the "orphans" and all kinds of neat non-Clinton-y stuff.

So what happened to Silby?

Despite Silsby’s stated intent to take the children over the border to an unauthorized orphanage and her connections to human traffickers such as Torres-Puello, the courts eventually dropped the kidnapping and criminal association charges against her. Silsby was instead convicted under the additional charge of organizing illegal travel, sentenced to time served (3 months and 8 days), and released on May 17, 2010. In the end, her sentence was based on the least polemic charge against her. The pressing issue—whether Silsby intended to deliver the children into trafficking rings or grey adoption markets—was not addressed or resolved.

Rather than turning on Silsby’s actions, the decision in her case appeared to turn on the actions of the parents. Judge Bernard Saint-Vil explained that his decision was based on the Haitian parents’ testimony that they had “[given] their kids away voluntarily.” Similarly, defense lawyer Jorge Puello stated that the missionaries “willingly accepted kids they knew were not orphans because the parents said they would starve otherwise.” Another trial attorney for the missionaries, Aviol Fleurant, argued that “[t]he parents’ testimony means no law was broken and ‘we can’t talk any more about trafficking of human beings.’”

More bombshells about the people who were "trafficking in Haitian orphans," from the same document. Pizzagate investigators will never highlight or mention this:

The Americans denied any wrongdoing and said they had been trying to help children left orphaned and destitute by the Haitian earthquake. They said Puello had approached their relatives and church, offering his help. It turned out that the children who were with the U.S. missionaries had living parents, many of whom testified they had voluntarily handed their offspring to the Americans in the hope they would be given an education and a better life.

Pizzagate theorists will point to a lawyer Torres to try to make Silsby and crew look worse, but just read this excerpt from an ICE News Release to put it all into context:

In early 2010, Torres surfaced in the Dominican Republic posing as a lawyer representing American church workers detained in Haiti in the wake of the earthquake in that country. Torres convinced a church that he was Jorge Torres Puello, an international lawyer and president of "Puello Consulting" in the Dominican Republic.

Torres obtained a monetary retainer from the families of the detained missionaries and began representing himself to the Haitian court and international media as the attorney/spokesman for them. However, U.S. authorities recognized him as Jorge Torres when media reports showed images of the "alleged" lawyer wearing a suit and carrying a brief case.

An extradition package was prepared and sent to representatives in the Dominican Republic. Torres was arrested, detained and extradited to the United States to face the 2003 alien smuggling charges in Vermont. He pleaded guilty to the charges.

To sum up this Torres business, the dude faked his identity, offered his services (as in HE approached THEM), bamboozled the missionaries, pretended to be their lawyer until he got extradited.

So Bill Clinton was asked to go in and straighten this business out. Hillary Clinton emailed someone for details about the situation. There are so many leaps that have to be made here to get to satanic-pedo-ritual-sex-slavery ring it's not even funny.

And so, after all this, Pizzagate investigators go berserk over this this email "where they are literally pricing how much it costs to transport children" but it's just a synopsis of a fucking charity organization. Nothing more, nothing less.

How's it feel posting all that copypasta defending this shit?

I suggest anyone who isn't a Clinton bot read this for background instead.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-25/clinton-silsby-trafficking-scandal-and-how-media-attempted-ignorecover-it

That article, from DisobedientMedia btw aka Titus Frost aka /u/PleadingtheYiff aka known larper - opens with the statement

Contrary to reports in the media, the crowd sourced investigation labeled by some as "Pizzagate" did not begin with internet sleuths digging through the Wikileaks Podesta Files releases looking for pizza parlors and encoded language discussing humano trafficking. It began with the shocking discovery that Hillary and Bill Clinton provided assistance to convicted child trafficker, Laura Silsby, resulting in a reduced sentence for child trafficking

This isn't true. Silsby is the only missionary who Clinton didn't secure the release of.

https://imgur.com/xTPPYWQ.png

http://harvardhrj.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/King.pdf

Yeah, it's obvious why they couldn't. And anyone who's actually been following this knows why.

But her sentence was reduced because of intervention by Bill.

And I have nothing to say to your type that won't get deleted anyway. Your defense of this is disgusting.

Sick indeed.

Seems like a situation where they could have given those services at any point, but instead, went when families had just experienced a catastrophe and wouldn't be in their right minds to make a decision, let alone give away their children.

This is preying on victims in a time of need.

How much are you paid to defend pedos?

Removed. Rule 10

Another case that deserves looking into again for sure.

She was married to Gayler, divorced him to marry Silsby - divorced Silsby and remarried Gayler. Wade Gayler is a slime bucket from the Red Cross - with a criminal record from Utah. They even got her son (a Silsby...) involved in the rebuild Haiti BS and they attempted to open an Adoption Foster program out West...skuzzy people IMHO.

Whoops, the memo was a bust - better push some old bullshit claims that make Hillary look bad. Because somehow it's still Trump vs Hillary?

Funny you're pushing "the memo is a bust" narrative.

It's all over this sub, even before it was released.

I'm not pushing any narrative. I was here when the memo was released and have had quite a few discussions about it. I'm not saying its worthless, but it's certainly not been the bombshell, worse-than-Watergate release that people had claimed.

I've seen countless comments just like yours here today. Almost word for word.

Why don't you come out and actually say what you're trying to do here - accuse me of being a shill? Your wimpy attempt to say it without saying it is pathetic. Have some backbone - even if you're going to be an asshole making an idiot claim, stand behind that claim.

Haha.

You're amusing.

Thanks babe.

You may not be a shill but being brainwashed is probably even worse.

I encourage you to look through my post history. I am not a trump supporter or a Hillary supporter. The only reason this "old bullshit" has been posted today is because of the newly released State Department documents. Nothing in my post, or my post history for that matter, indicates that I have EVER been about pushing the Trump vs Hillary narrative. I know how much fun it must be to put people into divisive catagorize but at the end of the day, it's not Trump vs Hillary. It's us vs them. And yes. Trump is in the "them" catagory in my humble opinion.

Sick indeed.