Ruh-roh. Quick Scoob lets get out of here before the shills get here!

You have a little down time before they get their talking points straight.

Until then... "IT'S A NOTHING HAMBURGER REEEEE"

The talking points dont appear until news articles appear. Thats where the average person gets their narratives.

This is so true. I love this period of time though, before the CNN narrative kicks in. Where people are allowed to think for themselves. Feels good to swim in truth for a little bit :)

Before a bunch of shills start shitting all over the threads and regurgitate the lines they are trained to memorize from their power points.

Somewhere, right now, a New York Times journalist is writing what will be regurgitated by reddit twentysomethings across the site -- and blasted to the front page by Spez's special "algorithm"

When dealing with Obama it is always a nothing happy Meal.

Lol

It's like the famous "hillary just collapsed on video" moment were shills got like a day off so they could figure out what to say

Non-contiguous pneumonia that she caught from her staff!

Lol.

"It was hot, she was just overheated"

I loved that period of time right when they were going "it didn't happen" and the video hit the net. Frozen like a deer in the headlights. "Uhhhh...."

I think they were here right from the start actually.

The recent info has been so damning that the shills are having a hard time spinning a counter-narrative. It's actually civilized in here.

Uh OhOOOBAMA.

It's not a good look for the first black president to end up in prison.

They're just gonna call it racism.

""""SCANDAL FREE""""

Sorry, I disagree, I predict that Bill Clinton will be the first black ex-President to see a jail cell.

saxophone intensifies

They just might let Bill take that saxophone to the federal penitentary.

He will be playing the flute

Huh? .. oh.. Oooh!

Saxamaphone, saxamaphone.

Dental plan.........yeah, Im bored.

Epic sax guy 10 hours

I see what you did there. Very clever.

20 year old cultural reference, and you caught it!!

He's going to croak...any minute.

according to America's finest news source, the first black president spent his whole campaign asking for change, so...

Oh Jesus Christ lol.

LO7

NObama!!!

Once this scandal blows up, it's going to change politics in this country forever. It will probably destroy the Democrat party for all eternity and make room for a new 3rd party.

^This

Well, A lot of people tell me Bernie is the real deal, at least from the liberals side.

Facts

I like you.

Bernie is the real deal and he may have been roughed up and threatened to set down during the convention

They roughed him up with that 3rd mansion and that Audi R8

Man, having properties consistent with someone with his salary making modest investments for, how long has he been a public servant? 40 something years? Anyway, yeah, that really makes him a sellout.

It's totally the same as all these "liberals" and neoliberals in Congress suddenly making millions cough cough Pelosi cough cough Clinton.

I can't believe people are stupid enough to buy this shit about Bernie. Anyone who looks at what he did as Mayor of Burlington or what he's been talking about for his entire political career (ya know, railing against every foreign policy and domestic mistake the United States has been making for decades?) knows that his policies are a threat to the oligarchy. And yet all this incredibly weak bullshit seems to stick for you people. Oh no, he has three houses! Or the whole "what has he gotten accomplished in Congress" line- like, what the fuck do you expect given the establishment he's working against? One of, what, three independent Senators? Of course he hasn't gotten shit done, because the rest of the country has been voting in pieces of shit who bow and scrape to whoever throws them a million dollars. At least Bernie's been calling it like it is for his entire fucking life.

What really gets me about this, is the same people who buy these weak ass smears against Bernie tend to also be willing to look the way on any number of things Trump's done.

Anyway, I hope to god Bernie runs in 2020, maybe we'll finally get the debate that chickenshit pussy Trump wimped out on.

While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Then why the bank fraud between him and his wife? Not sure about you, but someone that is real does not commit bank fraud, but that's my opinion. If Bernie runs in 2020 he would lose at this point he sold out to the establishment when he signed on with Hillary.

You sound like ctr bud. Literally the same bullshit, overused, low effort arguments.

Next you're gonna say his supporters were throwing chairs?

What about that time he interrupted BLM, right? He's racisss!

Come on now, do your thing. Tell us how bad Bernie is

Well he has had supports cause shootings.

1 shot and nearly killed a Republican senator 1 beat nearly to death Rand Paul 1 caused mass shooting in Portland

You may fine that acceptable I do not. I am not being bias though. You may have your head planted so far up Bernie was, but if Trump has to take responsibility for Charlottesville, as Bernie himself suggested. Bernie should take responsibility for those 3. Practice what you preach.

Practice what you preach.

thing is i never preached that. i dont think trump supporters talk for trump and im surprised that bernie said so. if you have a link id like to watch that btw.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59Wzmwfwymo

thats not what you said though.he said he should tell his supporters not to do that.

There are a lot of us that agree and I don't live in Vermont.

Vermonter here: That Audi story is a lie and I've been to his "mansion."

Also a vermonter and the audi is an insane joke. That feeble old man probably never cracks 50 on route 7 if he already doesn't have a legal need to be driven around.

an insane joke.

like bernie!

HE CAN STILL WIN JUST DONATED MY CAT MATCH ME!

his actual voting record going back to 1992 says otherwise.

his record is basically the same as diane fienstien's.

he's no russ finegold, which is why you don't know russ finegold.

nothing illustrates this better than finegold's 2006 censure resoultion against bush and cheney. sanders refused to sign on because, and i quote, "it would be divisive."

only 3 people had the balls to join finegold in trying to censure people for torturing people. finegold has been the dems greatest foe on the left every since, because, unlike kucinich, finegold really does have national electability.

sanders didn't start getting public adoration as the savior of the left until obama's last term. he hit the news rounds by strategically saying obama should be primaried, which he laughed off right after it had achieved his purpose--a gig on tv talk shows. after that, he became a regular on sunday talkshows, increasing his name recognition, but always sure to say he was a socialist, which he is not. not even close.

he was pushed in 2015 as the presumably unelectable pied piper candidate on the left to keep finegold out, and make sure the actual left was engaged enough to go to the polls in nov. he wasn't supposed to do well. no one thought it would be an issue.

people who think he was not an intentional judas goat are blinded by their fandom. the real left called it in the summer of 2015, in fact we called it in 2011 when he bounded into the forefront with his primary obama stunt.

finegold voted against the neo-jim crowe act of 1994, sanders voted for it and to this day refuses to admit the vote was evil, weasling out of it by citing the two toothless dem beard provisions, violence against women and assault weapons. both were jokes added solely as cover.

fwiw socialism is the socioeconomic system wherein 100% of the means of production (i.e. capital) and 100% of the profits resulting from its application are equally owned as an inalienable right by those whose actual labor in applying the means of production generates the profit. and i mean actual workers, not managerial classes.

you cannot be a socialist and support the continuation of capitalism. even the kinder, gentler keynesian capitalism of sanders. he is not a democratic socialist, he is a social democrat, which is a euphamism for social capitalist.

the real left has called him out for this for decades. he presuambly is suffciently well educated and intelligent to know he is misusing the terms. so why does he do it?

OH OH I KNOW!

because hes a fraud. lol

Destroying political parties and a hard push for transparencies... Yes please.

.......are you mental?

When you mention this scandal, is this the “but her emails” scandal or a different one?

fisa scandal obviously

If that’s the case, then why is this comment in a thread about the Clinton email investigation?

the emails from clinton are about the fisa scandal, its all related

It will probably destroy the Democrat party for all eternity and make room for a new 3rd party.

please yes.

What about the republicans? Both parties blow bloody dicks.

My side of the aisle needs to address the beam in its own eye first. R's didn't screw the country out of Bernie. Dem party & HRC's neolib/corporadem enablers are why we have Trump.

yay

Keep dreaming.

Thank god, or science, or what ever you believe in

The scandals are against the Republican party for the most part as they are in complete control.

Conspiring with Russia, dismissing of rape, rampant racism, promoting violence against dissenters, contempt for the media, gross miss use of funds, embezzlement etc.

It's a staggering, never ending flood of corruption and greed.

Your CNN talking points and political smears are best suited in r/politics.

Way to prove contempt for the media, want to go for racism. I’m a Jew if it helps. You had like nine words and some how still contradicted yourself. Impressive.

Anyone with a developed intellect has contempt for the media. What's your point? What's that? You don't have one?

What does being a Jew having to do with anything? Are you drunk-posting?

You had 3 sentences and managed to say absolutely nothing at all. Was your post randomly-generated or are you going to claim credit for this failure to engage in critical thinking? This is opposite of impressive.

Are you done drooling on yourself yet? If you read the comments back it's clear how I am pointing out that fact that you are a moron. You call, among other things 'contempt for the media' a 'talking point' while at the same time - and now twice - saying you have contempt for the media. I was pointing out how you contradict yourself so easily.

I can't believe I need to explain this to you twice, but seeing your comment history it makes sense I would need to. Reply if you like wasting your time - which seeing as you have no life, friends, intellect or relationship, you probably will.

Ouch. Looks like it's gotten person for the little snowflake. I'm aware I tend to get under the skin of you over emotional liberals but you're not even trying to hide it. You're reading my post history too? And admitting it? Nice. Continue to admire. Look, but don't touch. I own you now.

1.) Show me where I called contempt for the media a talking point. If this depends on your interpretation of words, which is to say, your convulsion of the truth in order to artificially create the variables you want and need in the argument, then you sir, have in a single gasp, exposed your own stupidity and desperation.

This is not going to end well for you. Remain seated.

2.) I've said I have contempt for the media once in response to you. My first comment was a reference to another liberal jackass bringing his r/politics talking point bullshit into an arena where it obviously has no place: His response to a thread with incredibly damning evidence against the DNC and in particular key members within it, was not to talk about the issue being discussed in the thread, but to derail into a political hackjob bullshit because any argument against the subject matter is absolutely impossible, because the Democrat party is infested with scandal and everyone on the planet knows it. He got checked, just like you're getting checked right now.

Now, your response to this, was to talk about Jews and contempt for the media (just... wow), because like him, you too are a fucking moron, with nothing substantial to say about the subject matter. No, like him, and all other zombie hive-minded liberal sheep, you have a monotone and entirely predictable path of progression in an argument or discussion. It always starts with ignoring the subject at hand, or dismissing it (both of you have done this, and you've done it twice now) and instead making it about the person whose comments you disagree with (bingo) or a strawman/unrelated issue (wow, you're 3 for 3).

Now you've reduced yourself into the "you don't have a life looooser lolol!!!!1!" angle? Another sure sign you've just gotten your ass wrecked in an argument. Nowhere to go but down.

I can assure you, that you do not possess the mental and intellectual equipment required to dance with me. Go back to your little circle-jerk where people always agree with each other and your thoughts are never challenged (which of course is why you fucking idiots never learn how to argue).

Here? You will continue to get your ass kicked. Every. Single. Time. Spend some time educating yourself and expanding your mind, and come back in a few years to try again.

Then it’s a race to destruction on both sides. Woohoo! Who will shit their respective bed into oblivion first

Enter the Libertarian Party center-stage:

Their plan: Take over! And then leave everybody the fuck alone.

lol.

Fucking thank God. Finally get those fucking poors and old cunts off my dime.

I dont really think this scandal can "blow up".

Let me explain:

We've got two sides so enormously determined that the other is at fault. One side claims that a foreign state influenced the election and essentially put their own puppet in control of the country. Driving it off the deep end of a cliff.

The otherone, claims a "deepstate"-esque group is devilishly trying to usurp a lawfully elected president of the Country. Using bogus claims and cherry picking comments to paint him dirty. Buying peoples trusts/allegiances.

See. Regardless of who ends up "right" in this, shits going fucking down.

Muller goes on stage claiming there was no collusion and no obstruction of justice? get ready for riots.

Muller goes on stage claiming there was collusion and obstuction of justice (+ an second attempt of obstuction of justice with the whole GOP memo and attacks on the fbi). Get ready for riots.

I dont think people are calling this "bigger than watergate" just for hyperbole. This shit is actually pretty scary, and should worry a lot of people. Regardless of which side "gets it right" sort-o-say. Things will get violent.

And that scares the hell out of me.

There is nowhere near enough fire to burn anything down, no matter how hard people try to fan the flames.

retarded.

Oh man. LOL

Wait till Trumpers realize that the Papadopoulos "Very Senior Campaign Member" hasn't been revealed yet.

what does your comment have to do with the subject of this post?

Is this related to the newly released text messages between Strzok and Page? Or is this the new investigation into Hillary Clinton's private email server? Is there any evidence besides an assumption that when Comey says "another senior government official" he is talking about Obama? Is the quote from the title a part of the newly released texts. Can anybody have a conversation with me about this, or are we just laughing at shills and Dems?

yes this is from the newly released Strzok text...they changed the language to avoid using President...to I guess soften the blow of what she did...just a little collusion.

Thank you. When they are discussing "Director Comey’s statement," are they referring to his press conference on July 5th, 2016, where he did not recommend criminal charges to the DoJ? I'm unsure if “Hope so. Just left Bill. . . . He changed President to ‘another senior government official.’” is referring to Comey's statement, because those words don't really appear in his statement. The closest I could find in Comey's statement is "Others we found by reviewing the archived government e-mail accounts of people who had been government employees at the same time as Secretary Clinton, including high-ranking officials at other agencies, people with whom a Secretary of State might naturally correspond." Unless these texts are referring to another statement made by Comey. Not trying to shill or be obtuse, I just want to be sure we are all discussing the same sources. I appreciate your responses.

This is what it says after the quote:

In Comey’s final statement, even the reference to “another senior government official” might have been viewed as too incriminating, and it was stricken altogether

So, you're not finding it, because it was taken out before he said it.

Thank you, I missed that. And do we have any evidence that this was actually edited out of Comey's statement, besides the Strzok/Page texts? The texts only talk about removing "President" from the statement, then it is in the words of Senator Ron Johnson that "'another senior government official' might have been viewed as too incriminating, and it was stricken altogether." I want to be sure we can differentiate between known facts and what the report is assuming.

Well, yes, there is some speculation going on. It's an interim report and they are requesting further investigation on these points they're bringing up.

I think the footnotes there are leading you to the text messages that were just released (Appendix C - Documents.pdf) - but it's 500 pages and I can't search through right now.

Let me know if you see something. I'll come back to this a little later. ;-)

I'm looking forward to where this leads. I want to remain skeptical until something solid bubbles up, especially when the title sounds so damning and all the comments are congratulating each other for a big "win," but there's no actual discussion about the substance.

It's very unlikely that there will be a "big win" on any single text message. People get excited though.

And yes, I checked and the footnotes do lead to the text messages in the pdf I linked.

Footnote 72 in this interim report = DOJ-PROD-166 (page 284) in the 500+ pages of text messages just released.

This is what I was afraid of. Now they are inserting fake statements into Comey's actual statement to make it all look true.

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

• [/r/betternews] UH-OH. “Hope so. Just left Bill. . . . He changed President to ‘another senior government official.’”

 ^{If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)}

How long will we just talk about this? Enough talk, start arresting! Bring back some faith to the people.

Isn't it weird how its always the left that gets caught in stuff like this. Schiff was just prank called for example. This stuff never happens to republicans it seems yet there are still tons of people wondering why Assange doesnt release any dirt on them.

They aren't guilty of these huge crimes.

Considering how much this sub has been getting brigaded recently, I'm impressed it's done this well. Bravo, OP.

73 Section 793(f) prohibits having knowledge, and failing to report, the existence of national defense documents that are mishandled through gross negligence.

Can you show me where it says that?

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793

They roughed him up with that 3rd mansion and that Audi R8

his actual voting record going back to 1992 says otherwise.

his record is basically the same as diane fienstien's.

he's no russ finegold, which is why you don't know russ finegold.

nothing illustrates this better than finegold's 2006 censure resoultion against bush and cheney. sanders refused to sign on because, and i quote, "it would be divisive."

only 3 people had the balls to join finegold in trying to censure people for torturing people. finegold has been the dems greatest foe on the left every since, because, unlike kucinich, finegold really does have national electability.

sanders didn't start getting public adoration as the savior of the left until obama's last term. he hit the news rounds by strategically saying obama should be primaried, which he laughed off right after it had achieved his purpose--a gig on tv talk shows. after that, he became a regular on sunday talkshows, increasing his name recognition, but always sure to say he was a socialist, which he is not. not even close.

he was pushed in 2015 as the presumably unelectable pied piper candidate on the left to keep finegold out, and make sure the actual left was engaged enough to go to the polls in nov. he wasn't supposed to do well. no one thought it would be an issue.

people who think he was not an intentional judas goat are blinded by their fandom. the real left called it in the summer of 2015, in fact we called it in 2011 when he bounded into the forefront with his primary obama stunt.

finegold voted against the neo-jim crowe act of 1994, sanders voted for it and to this day refuses to admit the vote was evil, weasling out of it by citing the two toothless dem beard provisions, violence against women and assault weapons. both were jokes added solely as cover.

fwiw socialism is the socioeconomic system wherein 100% of the means of production (i.e. capital) and 100% of the profits resulting from its application are equally owned as an inalienable right by those whose actual labor in applying the means of production generates the profit. and i mean actual workers, not managerial classes.

you cannot be a socialist and support the continuation of capitalism. even the kinder, gentler keynesian capitalism of sanders. he is not a democratic socialist, he is a social democrat, which is a euphamism for social capitalist.

the real left has called him out for this for decades. he presuambly is suffciently well educated and intelligent to know he is misusing the terms. so why does he do it?

Well, yes, there is some speculation going on. It's an interim report and they are requesting further investigation on these points they're bringing up.

I think the footnotes there are leading you to the text messages that were just released (Appendix C - Documents.pdf) - but it's 500 pages and I can't search through right now.

Let me know if you see something. I'll come back to this a little later. ;-)

It's very unlikely that there will be a "big win" on any single text message. People get excited though.

And yes, I checked and the footnotes do lead to the text messages in the pdf I linked.

Footnote 72 in this interim report = DOJ-PROD-166 (page 284) in the 500+ pages of text messages just released.

""""SCANDAL FREE""""

thats not what you said though.he said he should tell his supporters not to do that.