Why? Do you need the government when you drive down the road or enter a store? What's the point of having a government? They just fuck you, steal the money back, then kill you... like the psychopathic gamer in grand theft auto games...
These are pretty essential things that we all chip in on.
lol, your "tax dollars" do not go to any of those things. You'd be better off donating to the bum on the street corner (which I do - and other private charitable organizations). Fun fact, there was a time when all of those things were done privately, and well out performed what we have today. Ask people in Detroit about taxes and the "services" you speak of, lol. Furthermore. Do you donate your money voluntarily, or just let the "man" take it out, so you don't have to "deal with donating"?
Evidence, because tax dollars go to the debt incurred from the Federal Reserve. Your city is Corporation. The Police are incorporated and and so are the schools. If taxes went to all these things, we wouldn't need tickets and asset forfeiture.
Wat? Of course they get paid, Federal Reserve notes, but... your taxes are not paying for them. It's simple. Look if your city is incorporated or not, then further deduce. Not hard, SJWPussyLibtard (your username).
OP is a sovcit that believes in the whole "Federal Government is a private corporation" bullshit. There is no winning this argument with a crazy person.
It's actually unbelievable to read some of this stuff in real time. OP claims no need for government, then 3 posts later claims the government is needed to pay for roads. What must the mind be like to operate this way..
Ok, so is it a conspiracy that the USPS doesn't exist or something? I have seen them sort mail myself, but to each is their own, Soylent Green is made out of people after all...
No, it doesn't.
Uh, that's weird I guess that there are these private companies offering something called "Medicare" after all, it ain't the gubernment /s.
You need to reread the Origin of Species if you think it's just all about the "survival of the fittest" lmafo. For starters, survival does not refer to individuals but to inheritable traits, fittest means “most suited to its environment." Also the need for "survival of the fittest" becomes irrelevant when a population is large enough, see the new"Super-chicken" experiment. Now what does any of that have to do with auto-immune dieses?
marxism has nothing to do with survival of the fittest. marxism/capitalism are both environments in which organisms must compete to survive. a dick sucking party loyalist would be more fit for a Marxist society just like an amoral opportunist would be better suited for a capitalistic environment. there is no nullifying survival of the fittest, it's common sense.
most mail sorting is automated by government owned machinery. USPS revolutionize mail sorting and scanning. they probably store and track the data to create a database. why would the government give up that power
That, along with the nasty Alliance they have with the health insurance companies. I don't believe in universal health care and pharmaceutical industry, but the price of pharmaceuticals is fucking outrageous.
Umm not all of these examples are good. Private contractors paid by the govt and USPS mail tends to be done by USPS mail in many areas. Corporations and govt both have a very strong track record of stealing and killing. My point the decision to just "get rid of government" isn't as binary as you think.
Who the fuck do you think builds the roads? Or makes sure that the stores aren't selling poisoned food?
Not the fucking gov't. At best they act as middle men by paying private corps to build roads...and the reason restaurants don't poison their customers isn't some FDA regulation...
I take it you don't understand how unions work do you?
Do you need the government when you drive down the road or enter a store?
Yes, yes I do. I need regulations to make sure my car doesn't explode on the way there, so the bridge doesn't collapse as I drive over it, oh, and I use public roads the entire way as well. I need regulations so the store doesn't sell me tainted or expired products, and etc. /u/Putin_Loves_Cats, quit cting.
If the world was one and everybody got along and sang kumbaya by the fire, people weren't trying to kill each other only then could we get rid of the government. But the reality we live in, we definitely need government.
We don’t know enough to comment on the nature of this new memo and the level of transparency that can be provided.
If the is no more sensitive than the Nunes memo it should absolutely be allowed to go out unredacted. If there’s anything that could be deemed compromising to safety and security of Americans then Schiff should be transparent and edit his own memo to put it on the same level as the Nunes memo in terms of detail.
Adam Schiff's little game of purposely putting sensitive information into the memo knowing Trump can't legally release it will probably backfire on Little Schiff-for-brains Adam. He's not the brightest.
oh. Thanks. Well I think there should be a new hash tag for it because it's the same as the other memo. Maybe #releasetheDEMO #releasetheothermemo #releasethememo2
If the world was one and everybody got along and sang kumbaya by the fire, people weren't trying to kill each other only then could we get rid of the government. But the reality we live in, we definitely need government.
86 comments
1 Putin_loves_cats 2018-02-10
How about... we get rid of government?
1 Tski3 2018-02-10
You can't just get rid of government. I believe we don't need near the level if governance that we currently have, but some framework needs to exist.
We need to get money out of politics and government.
1 Putin_loves_cats 2018-02-10
Why? Do you need the government when you drive down the road or enter a store? What's the point of having a government? They just fuck you, steal the money back, then kill you... like the psychopathic gamer in grand theft auto games...
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-02-10
Ever heard of the police? Or like firemen? How about roads? These are pretty essential things that we all chip in on.
1 Putin_loves_cats 2018-02-10
lol, your "tax dollars" do not go to any of those things. You'd be better off donating to the bum on the street corner (which I do - and other private charitable organizations). Fun fact, there was a time when all of those things were done privately, and well out performed what we have today. Ask people in Detroit about taxes and the "services" you speak of, lol. Furthermore. Do you donate your money voluntarily, or just let the "man" take it out, so you don't have to "deal with donating"?
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-02-10
Tax dollars don't pay for all those things I just listed?
1 Putin_loves_cats 2018-02-10
Evidence, because tax dollars go to the debt incurred from the Federal Reserve. Your city is Corporation. The Police are incorporated and and so are the schools. If taxes went to all these things, we wouldn't need tickets and asset forfeiture.
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-02-10
So none of the teachers and policemen get paid. It's all fake.
1 Putin_loves_cats 2018-02-10
Wat? Of course they get paid, Federal Reserve notes, but... your taxes are not paying for them. It's simple. Look if your city is incorporated or not, then further deduce. Not hard, SJWPussyLibtard (your username).
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-02-10
My taxes go to the government and the government pays all the people I listed. The debt is an entirely different issue.
1 Putin_loves_cats 2018-02-10
Gonna need some evidence for this...
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-02-10
Do public school teachers get checks from the fed or the county they work in? You need a pay stub bud? You wanna see a teacher's pay stub?
1 Putin_loves_cats 2018-02-10
Check your wallet and see if it says: "Federal Reserve Note". That should answer your question. The teachers have the same, same with FF and police ;)
1 bbhr 2018-02-10
OP is a sovcit that believes in the whole "Federal Government is a private corporation" bullshit. There is no winning this argument with a crazy person.
1 4-7-2-3-9-8-5BREATHE 2018-02-10
And what causes the debt? Public spending. This is a circular argument lol
1 Putin_loves_cats 2018-02-10
Our currency is based on debt, hence why the debt will not and cannot be paid off. It's a game.
1 4-7-2-3-9-8-5BREATHE 2018-02-10
Yes, it's the foundation of society.
1 Putin_loves_cats 2018-02-10
Not really, tbh...
1 4-7-2-3-9-8-5BREATHE 2018-02-10
Like it is now you mean
1 Putin_loves_cats 2018-02-10
Do you like Marxism and Central Economic Planning?
1 4-7-2-3-9-8-5BREATHE 2018-02-10
Do you enjoy discussions in oblique obtuse pseudo-intellectual terms?
1 Putin_loves_cats 2018-02-10
You seem to not like questions ;)
1 Glen_Taylor 2018-02-10
You're not a bright man, stop cting man.
1 bbhr 2018-02-10
Who the fuck do you think builds the roads? Or makes sure that the stores aren't selling poisoned food?
I'm sure when you graduate high school you will understand the functions of government better.
1 Putin_loves_cats 2018-02-10
Private contractors. Who the fuck do you think delivers and sorts USPS mail? Private contractors...
Don't even get me started on this bullshit fallacy. Look into how the US government poisoned alcohol during the prohibition...
I'm well into my thirties. You may be projecting... Try again, slugger...
1 Vienna1529 2018-02-10
Paid by whom?
1 Putin_loves_cats 2018-02-10
Depends...
1 Glen_Taylor 2018-02-10
You seem to love trolling like Bull Connor cracking SNCC skulls.
1 Vienna1529 2018-02-10
well?
1 Putin_loves_cats 2018-02-10
The Corporation that is the US government, and your city? Look into it. I find it funny hoe I get downvoted so much on this topic....
1 Algae328 2018-02-10
So the government is paying for it then.
1 Boneasaurus 2018-02-10
It's actually unbelievable to read some of this stuff in real time. OP claims no need for government, then 3 posts later claims the government is needed to pay for roads. What must the mind be like to operate this way..
1 Vienna1529 2018-02-10
Hey, I'm OP.
Putin just hijacked it.
1 Glen_Taylor 2018-02-10
The USPS...
1 Putin_loves_cats 2018-02-10
No, lol....
No, it doesn't.
She should probably die, then. Why haven't you helped her?
Okie dokie. Give this 20 from me to her. What have you done?
1 Glen_Taylor 2018-02-10
Ok, so is it a conspiracy that the USPS doesn't exist or something? I have seen them sort mail myself, but to each is their own, Soylent Green is made out of people after all...
Uh, that's weird I guess that there are these private companies offering something called "Medicare" after all, it ain't the gubernment /s.
1 Putin_loves_cats 2018-02-10
Nope.
Cool? I've sorted USPS mail under a contractor as well! Shit... did I say contractor?
The rest of what you said is nonsense and gibberish...
1 Glen_Taylor 2018-02-10
Directly quoting you when you wish death upon my mom is nonsense and gibberish I agree. You need to get some help.
1 Putin_loves_cats 2018-02-10
Survival of the fittest. Do you not science, bruh ;)
1 Glen_Taylor 2018-02-10
You need to reread the Origin of Species if you think it's just all about the "survival of the fittest" lmafo. For starters, survival does not refer to individuals but to inheritable traits, fittest means “most suited to its environment." Also the need for "survival of the fittest" becomes irrelevant when a population is large enough, see the new"Super-chicken" experiment. Now what does any of that have to do with auto-immune dieses?
1 Putin_loves_cats 2018-02-10
Marxism says it, so... it's done!
1 Glen_Taylor 2018-02-10
I have no what you are trying to say, have a great day /u/Putin_Loves_Cats.
1 Putin_loves_cats 2018-02-10
I'm just pointing out idiocy of Marxists. Long you and yours! If she breaks a hip, please help her. If it's not enough, shoot me a PM :)
1 Glen_Taylor 2018-02-10
Not sure how MS has anything do with someone breaking their hip but thanks I guess. You are not going to send my mother cyanide are you?
1 social_libertarian 2018-02-10
marxism has nothing to do with survival of the fittest. marxism/capitalism are both environments in which organisms must compete to survive. a dick sucking party loyalist would be more fit for a Marxist society just like an amoral opportunist would be better suited for a capitalistic environment. there is no nullifying survival of the fittest, it's common sense.
1 social_libertarian 2018-02-10
most mail sorting is automated by government owned machinery. USPS revolutionize mail sorting and scanning. they probably store and track the data to create a database. why would the government give up that power
1 Oftowerbroleaning 2018-02-10
The government is the reason she can't afford the medication to begin with.....
1 Glen_Taylor 2018-02-10
Fair, Medicare Part D expansion is a joke.
1 Oftowerbroleaning 2018-02-10
That, along with the nasty Alliance they have with the health insurance companies. I don't believe in universal health care and pharmaceutical industry, but the price of pharmaceuticals is fucking outrageous.
1 Oftowerbroleaning 2018-02-10
Pills that cost a few cents to make are sold for hundreds of dollars.
1 Droooolyfacee 2018-02-10
Umm not all of these examples are good. Private contractors paid by the govt and USPS mail tends to be done by USPS mail in many areas. Corporations and govt both have a very strong track record of stealing and killing. My point the decision to just "get rid of government" isn't as binary as you think.
1 daryltry 2018-02-10
Not the fucking gov't. At best they act as middle men by paying private corps to build roads...and the reason restaurants don't poison their customers isn't some FDA regulation...
1 Oftowerbroleaning 2018-02-10
We could just have private toll roads.....
1 Glen_Taylor 2018-02-10
I take it you don't understand how unions work do you?
Yes, yes I do. I need regulations to make sure my car doesn't explode on the way there, so the bridge doesn't collapse as I drive over it, oh, and I use public roads the entire way as well. I need regulations so the store doesn't sell me tainted or expired products, and etc. /u/Putin_Loves_Cats, quit cting.
1 Putin_loves_cats 2018-02-10
Unions are cancer.
For the rest of what you said... the government had no part... Moot...
1 Glen_Taylor 2018-02-10
Yeah, I hate having the weekend and a 40 work hour work week, it should be at least 96 hours /s.
So GARVEE bonds are financed privately lol? Grocery stores put regulations on themselves lol? Please, do tell more.
1 Putin_loves_cats 2018-02-10
Unions didn't give you that. Henry Ford set the precedent ;)
1 ehll_oh_ehll 2018-02-10
god i hate libertarians
1 Putin_loves_cats 2018-02-10
Why? Also, I'm not "Libertarian"...
1 ehll_oh_ehll 2018-02-10
I hate economic libertarianism from an ideological stand point. If you are against government taxation what ideology do you follow?
1 redditeditard 2018-02-10
Bitching about government but wanting to enforce abortion laws....
1 bbhr 2018-02-10
Randian Objectivism. They want to get rid of government, but only after it puts all the stuff they use in place.
1 StefanYellowCurry 2018-02-10
If the world was one and everybody got along and sang kumbaya by the fire, people weren't trying to kill each other only then could we get rid of the government. But the reality we live in, we definitely need government.
1 Spider_Goat7 2018-02-10
A memo created by the deep state. Sorry but no
1 joelberg 2018-02-10
More transperancy the better.
1 allianc4 2018-02-10
Yes because the Clinton and Obama stooges like Schiff have always loved transparency...threatening and silencing whistleblowers and all.
1 joelberg 2018-02-10
Yeah both things are wrong. Nice whataboutism though. Care to comment on the nature of this post and the need for transperancy?
1 allianc4 2018-02-10
We don’t know enough to comment on the nature of this new memo and the level of transparency that can be provided.
If the is no more sensitive than the Nunes memo it should absolutely be allowed to go out unredacted. If there’s anything that could be deemed compromising to safety and security of Americans then Schiff should be transparent and edit his own memo to put it on the same level as the Nunes memo in terms of detail.
1 joelberg 2018-02-10
DOJ and FBI already said the memo was fine as well as a Republican memeber of the house Intel committee.
1 allianc4 2018-02-10
Do you have a reliable source?
There’s a letter floating around from Wray and Rosenstein stating the opposite.
1 Oftowerbroleaning 2018-02-10
You realize the Republican memo highly incriminated the FBI, right?
1 joelberg 2018-02-10
You realize Republicans are attempting to smear our law enforcement so they can have hopes off not getting steamrolled in the midterms, right?
1 Oftowerbroleaning 2018-02-10
No, they're exposing the deep state, something anybody without an agenda should embrace on this sub.
1 joelberg 2018-02-10
My agenda is truth transperancy and justice.
1 Oftowerbroleaning 2018-02-10
I wonder if your username is satire or not. It seems as though it's not.
1 joelberg 2018-02-10
That has nothing to do with the subject
1 Oftowerbroleaning 2018-02-10
Oh, but I think it does.
1 joelberg 2018-02-10
Lol ok.
1 Tlingit_Raven 2018-02-10
No we already had that one released a few weeks back. Try to keep up friend.
1 ithoughtsobitch 2018-02-10
LOL when Trump releases the meo and Democrats ReeeEEEeEEEE about Trump releasing the names of covert agents. 😂😂😂
1 verstohlen 2018-02-10
Adam Schiff's little game of purposely putting sensitive information into the memo knowing Trump can't legally release it will probably backfire on Little Schiff-for-brains Adam. He's not the brightest.
1 StefanYellowCurry 2018-02-10
wait, didn't they already release the memo like last week? what am i missing?
1 Zarathasstra 2018-02-10
Then there was another memo but li’l schiff
1 Vienna1529 2018-02-10
There's a memo by the dems and Trump refuses to release it.
1 StefanYellowCurry 2018-02-10
oh. Thanks. Well I think there should be a new hash tag for it because it's the same as the other memo. Maybe #releasetheDEMO #releasetheothermemo #releasethememo2
1 mconeone 2018-02-10
Declassify, not release.
1 Shilling4Sheklez 2018-02-10
Oh, well nobody cares about their spin response Memo though.
1 Tski3 2018-02-10
You can't just get rid of government. I believe we don't need near the level if governance that we currently have, but some framework needs to exist.
We need to get money out of politics and government.
1 Putin_loves_cats 2018-02-10
Not really, tbh...
1 Putin_loves_cats 2018-02-10
Marxism says it, so... it's done!
1 StefanYellowCurry 2018-02-10
If the world was one and everybody got along and sang kumbaya by the fire, people weren't trying to kill each other only then could we get rid of the government. But the reality we live in, we definitely need government.
1 allianc4 2018-02-10
Yes because the Clinton and Obama stooges like Schiff have always loved transparency...threatening and silencing whistleblowers and all.
1 Vienna1529 2018-02-10
Hey, I'm OP.
Putin just hijacked it.
1 Oftowerbroleaning 2018-02-10
No, they're exposing the deep state, something anybody without an agenda should embrace on this sub.
1 Oftowerbroleaning 2018-02-10
I wonder if your username is satire or not. It seems as though it's not.