Agreed

Double agreed!

Feminazi lesbian SJW is the worst breed

Indeed. No wonder why whales like this are feminists and hate all men... Who the fuck would want to wake up next to that, except a soy boy...

Not sure this is the right sub but one thing I’m noticing besides the constant putting down of men in society over the last few years is the “we want equality” movement that everyone seems to be wound up in.

But instead of acting as part of the collective, these people holding signs want special treatment and attention.

Most of these activists don't want equality they want supremacy over the groups they say have privilege.

Identity politics is the name of the political game these days.

Fuck all these distinctions.

Everyone has an agenda. Find your own way and question everything and use critical thinking.

Being a classic liberal is more aligned with modern conservatism than it is the radical socialism of the current Democratic Party. I’m assuming that’s what you really mean by Liberal.

Personally, the Democratic Party was hijacked a long time ago and now resembles a wasteland of California nut jobs and foreign interests intent on doing our nation harm through fear mongering, institutional infiltration and public paranoia.

The Democratic Party no longer represents the small government, small farms and small businesses that the Party founder, Thomas Jefferson, believed in.

You say Democratic Party, but you are also leaving out the so called "progressives". They are just as much as cancer and a part of all this Cultural Marxism. I do agree with you on Classic Liberalism, though. I consider myself more aligned with them, meaning, "mind your business". If I'm not bothering anyone else, don't bother me. But, then... that would be very much the ethos of a Voluntaryist, which I consider myself. Don't fuck with me, and I won't fuck with you.

than it is the radical socialism of the current Democratic Party.

lmao in what way are dems socialist? They are corporatist neoliberals, even bernie isnt a socialist, I swear conservatives don't know what words mean, you have to be an idiot to think the dem party is in any way socialist let alone radical

Hmm. What do you think socialism is?

workers owning means of production. Socialism: a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.

In what way are the dems "radical socialists"? The same dems that when they had power gave us a right wing health care plan with a super majority and serve wall street and the military industrial complex and big business in general usually? Doesnt sound very socialist to me

So what you just said is also the meaning, colloquially, of communism. Democrats do want what you just described as socialism; the HC bill you just referenced was made during a locked congress and as such the conservatives had more sway in saying what the bill would be. It it wasn’t for them we would have gotten just that - socialist HC which would have been 100x worse on price and cost.

You conflated two things to try and make a point you shouldn’t have tried to make because you’re wrong. The modern Dem party is run by extreme socialists that want to curtail free markets with regulations that redistribute wealth while implementing new and grossly overbloated institutions and agencies to “help” the plebeian common man through leveraging control over capital.

Democrats do want what you just described as socialism

no they dont, show me one instance where they want workers to take over any business? And the dems did have a supermajority when they passed the right wing health care plan, thats not a locked congress...

lol I didn’t say they were successful socialists. That’s no less their ideology. It starts with union control of things and slowly works into nationalizing businesses. They just haven’t been able to.

Not quite sure what your deal is with trying to deny the ideology of a Party simply because example of their success don’t exist in pure ideological form.

there is no evidence that their ideology is socialist, you dodge this by saying they just havent been able to get anything done, bernie is more left leaning but even he isnt socialist, and the dems cheated bernie in favor of their more pro corporate clinton

Ok. You’re right. Go live life now.

Pretty much every actor in Hollywood is liberal. Not sure why people assume conservatives have a lock on hot chicks.

I think someone needs to look at some "before makeup" pictures of Holly Wood actresses ;)

Still would.

Still would what?

Bang those hot actresses without their make up on.

You'd have to just pray you weren't getting Harvey Weinstein's sloppy seconds though..

Welp, certainly living up to your username. You do you, bruh...

Right. Cause you have to be a super sjw pussy ass libtard in order to want to bang hot women. Word dude.

hot women

lmao, have you seen some of the "before makeup" pictures? The women for the most part, are butter faces. And, that's not even to bring up the topic that some or many of the "women", could be male transsexuals (ie. trans investigations). So, once again SJWPussyLibtard... you do you, bruh...

Not to mention nearly all of the "famous" ones have been passed around like the hors-d'oeuvre plate at a dinner party..

Sloppy 32nd's. Bitches be infected, mind, body, and soul. No thanks!

Are you seriously arguing that women in Hollywood aren't hot? Like that's your argument dude? Fuck. That's pretty hilarious. Alright man well stay away then. We'll take care of them for you.

Are you seriously arguing that women in Hollywood aren't hot?

Without makeup? Yes, they are dogs, both in appearance and morals.

We'll take care of them for you.

Okay, let me know how that goes. You may want to move out from your parent's basement first, though ;).

Have a good one!

Good luck with the fat fucks out in Alaska big guy. I'm sure you're killin it out there.

Why are you fat shaming? That doesn't sound very "progressive" and inclusive. Naughty, naughty and I'm triggered!!!!!

That said, I'm in a happy relationship with a strong/fit blonde hair blued eyed Polish gal. Her beauty is very deceiving, as is with most Slavic women ;)

Right. I know you're a fan of the Slavic folks. Her beauty is deceiving? Haha alright. That means most people think she's ugly.

Her beauty is deceiving? Haha alright. That means most people think she's ugly.

Quite the opposite, actually, hence the saying. You never heard it? You must not get out too much. It's a saying about a beautiful women's looks hiding her strength (ie. beautiful and strong - not like the barbie doll "princesses" in Holly Wood). Seriously, get out from the basement more often. Get some fresh air, or something...

Seriously dude. Find a new girlfriend that other people find attractive. Then you won't be so embarrassed.

Okie dokie, then. Hope others see your comments here and see you for what you really are. Don't go deleting them, now ;)

Hey you too champ.

What? Most of those women don't look considerably worse without make-up though? I'd even say Kim K, Katy Perry, Katie Holmes, Jennifer Aniston, Hillary Duff, Eva Longoria, Amanda Seyfried, Tyra Banks, Cameron Diaz, Julianne Hough, and Courtney Cox look exactly like you'd expect them to without makeup and are still really attractive without it. Are you honestly saying that looking at those women you don't find any of them attractive?

Kunis, Klum, and Lopez are the only ones that make surprisingly heap leaps and even then it's possible it''s just a bad photo on a bad day rather than they're unattractive without makeup.

None of them are attractive to me, no. Why? Because it's not just about physical beauty, it's everything... looks, personality, morals, etc etc. None of which, Holly Wood actresses actually have. They are whores, imo... To each their own, though... I wouldn't care too much to put my dick in the same hole, that Harvey Weinstein put his in...

Literally none of that has anything to do with your claim that without makeup they're not attractive though. You said they're all "butter faces" which suggests you don't find them physically attractive, and physical beauty is what the conversation was about.

Assuming they weren't celebrities and you knew absolutely nothing about these women, would you still think they weren't attractive if you just passed them on the street?

Assuming they weren't celebrities and you knew absolutely nothing about these women, would you still think they weren't attractive if you just passed them on the street?

To be perfectly honest? Yes, I most likely would. I already told you, I don't find any of them attractive. I have a preference for women, and so do you.

I just want to clarify by attractive I don't mean that you personally have to be attracted to them. Just if you acknowledge that they're good-looking? A person doesn't have to be your preference and you don't have to be attracted to them to acknowledge they're attractive (kind of like how I can say Brad Pitt is attractive without being attracted to him).

I just feel like there's a miscommunication here because in your last comment you said being attractive isn't about "physical beauty" ,which seems to imply you think they're good-looking, but now you're saying you don't think they're good looking?

Holy shit, dude. You are way overthinking this, which is bizarre as fuck. No, I do not find any of them attractive, beautiful, or pretty. How many times do I have to say it? Are you that fuckin' bored, or something?

Damn dude, calm down. Like I said I just thought there might have been a miscommunication.

None of them are attractive to me, no. Why? Because it's not just about physical beauty, it's everything... looks, personality, morals, etc etc. None of which, Holly Wood actresses actually have. They are whores, imo... To each their own, though... I wouldn't care too much to put my dick in the same hole, that Harvey Weinstein put his in...

That comment just seemed to strongly imply you found them physically beautiful but weren't attracted to them despite of this. Surely you see my confusion there because I didn't understand why you'd say "it's not just about physical beauty" if you didn't even find any of them physically beautiful?

Put down the bong or Adderall. I don't find any of them physically beautiful nor am I attracted to anyone of them. Have a lovely night.

I don't do either but okay. I'm not saying you do, all I was saying is your comment seemed to contradict that and was just confused why it changed from "i don't find them attractive because it's not about physical beauty" to "I don't find them attractive because they're not physically beautiful". Like I said, surely you can understand why I misunderstood you. You have a good one too.

It really doesn't matter but I'm legitimately curious, is there a reason you're calling it "Holly Wood" instead of "Hollywood"?

Look up what Holly wood is, in folklore ;)

The president of the United States' campaign chairman and campaign staffer being criminally indited for conspiracy against the United States and Conspiracy to launder money with a total of 58 charges between them.

[✕] Conspiracy

Libruls are dumb and ugly.

[✓] Conspiracy

Fake. News.

Before they were staffers and not-whilst staffers. FTFY

Just remember that while Obama had the house AND the senate, they banned zero AR-15’s

Indeed. No wonder why whales like this are feminists and hate all men... Who the fuck would want to wake up next to that, except a soy boy...