I don't think it is going to kill you. But some people have skin reactions to using toothpaste with fluoride. Also, I've read that it is bad for our pineal gland.
Potassium you find added to foods? They're mined. Your body doesn't know the difference between potassium that is mined or found in a banana. It's atomically the same exact thing. No magic involved.
“We conclude that penises are not best understood as the male sexual organ, or as a male reproductive organ, but instead as an enacted social construct that is both damaging and problematic for society and future generations… and is the conceptual driver behind much of climate change.”
Peer reviewed studies are a gatekeeping strategy used by the cabal/deep state. Not only can they control the outflow of information by having ownership of the peer reviewing and funds/finances that produce such results, they can shape the narrative on multiple fronts by doing so.
In truth, the systemic failure of peer review is one of science’s major, embarrassing open secrets.
As Dr David Kaplan tells us, “[P]eer review is known to engender bias, incompetence, excessive expense, ineffectiveness, and corruption. A surfeit of publications has documented the deficiencies of this system.”
“We conclude that penises are not best understood as the male sexual organ, or as a male reproductive organ, but instead as an enacted social construct that is both damaging and problematic for society and future generations… and is the conceptual driver behind much of climate change.”
Peer reviewed studies are a gatekeeping strategy used by the cabal/deep state. Not only can they control the outflow of information by having ownership of the peer reviewing and funds/finances that produce such results, they can shape the narrative on multiple fronts by doing so.
why is deliberately adding something to drinking water cheaper than just dumping it somewhere? and where does this whole 'fluoride keeps people docile' narrative come from?
if Big Fluorosilicic Acid is capable of convincing the public that it's safe to put in water I imagine they could convince the public hat it's safe to dispose of cheaply.
Lots of things are known neurotoxins. is fluoride neurotoxic at the levels encountered in drinking water? and even if it was, 'neurotoxin' =/= 'psychoactive'.
It is more toxic than rat poison. Forgive me for not wanting even a trace of it in my water. Or at the very least a CHOICE on whether or not to have it.
And please, do some research on it yourself before you come back with "prove it"
again, lots of things are toxic, and there are lots of things in small amounts in water. And you do have a choice, as much as you have a choice in any government policy; you can vote against it or move to an area that doen't implement it. Or, you can choose not to use municipal water supply, or even treat it to remove fluoride.
Technically you have a choice, realistically you don't.
It is every product like coke or pepsi that have water in it, and it is an expensive process, if not impossible to completely remove it. Why should I have to pay for an expensive process to remove something I didn't want in the first place?
Like vaccinations, technically you have a choice, but if you want your child to have any semblance of a life (go to school, join a sports team), you don't.
The lack of choice is the red flag, for me at least.
society is built around the idea of giving up freedoms for various benefits. Murder is illegal for everyone. You can't opt out of that, even if you wanted other people to be able to murder you, too. If you have income or own property, you need to pay taxes. In exchange, you get the continued protection and benefits of government, but you can't forgo those. If the government orders you to, you have to serve on a jury or in the military, to maintain the country's justice and security interests, which at least SHOULD align with those of a 'normal' citizen.
You should be able to question the safety of fluoride, but questioning things isn't useful if you're already determined to answer "that's not true".
Did you really just compare the right to clean water to having a right to murder?
You might want to check your logicometer. I think it might either be low on fluid or you might have some fluoride build up blocking the receptors.
If fluoride were beneficial to have in drinking water they'd package that shit as a supplimental additive and cash in... BUT it's not, so they give it to you for "free".
I compared them because they are both, a "right" that someone could theoretically claim to have. and your second point isn't very convincing. "If fire departments were beneficial to property owners they'd sell that shit as a service and cash in... BUT they're not, so they give them to you for "free"."
One is a product that claims to help your teeth (when directly applied instead of ingested).
The other is a life saving service which is generally viewed as a must have by every govt in the world. In fact, in the US it is a must if considering a township.
If the govt cares so much about my teeth, why won't they help me get em fixed? One could have to come out of pocket 10's of thousands to have their mouth corrected which in turn might save their life but the taxpayers will foot the bill on the property damage, jaws of life, lifeflight/ambulance every single time. It's because one is considered within the govts responsibilities to defend life, liberty, and property and the other isn't. Can you guess which is which?
47 comments
1 dahdestroyer 2018-02-26
No.
1 luna_jack 2018-02-26
Never
1 Putin_loves_cats 2018-02-26
No.
1 Rockran 2018-02-26
Poor putin never eaten a fishy?
1 grndzro4645 2018-02-26
No, it competes with Iodine.
1 DonnaGail 2018-02-26
I don't think it is going to kill you. But some people have skin reactions to using toothpaste with fluoride. Also, I've read that it is bad for our pineal gland.
1 Rockran 2018-02-26
Is mercury safe? Yes and no.
It's in tuna, but if you limit consumption you'll be fine.
So yes, it is safe in moderation.
1 AIsuicide 2018-02-26
Dude...there was just a huge school shooting there. I don't think it's safe.
1 DonnaGail 2018-02-26
🙂
1 AIsuicide 2018-02-26
I'm on my phone donna...is that a frown or a smile...I wouldn't want to be responsible for saying something that made you frown.
1 DonnaGail 2018-02-26
Smiley Face!!!!
1 AIsuicide 2018-02-26
😀
1 Rockran 2018-02-26
Dis guy
1 west_coastG 2018-02-26
it comes from china in a bucket with a skull and bones on it. so no.
1 Tookmyprawns 2018-02-26
So does potassium, an essential nutrient.
1 west_coastG 2018-02-26
how is that potassium processed or w/e? different that potassium in a banana?
1 Tookmyprawns 2018-02-26
Potassium you find added to foods? They're mined. Your body doesn't know the difference between potassium that is mined or found in a banana. It's atomically the same exact thing. No magic involved.
1 Oof_too_Humid 2018-02-26
Way to monetize waste! China knows how to capitalist!
1 Acatcalledpossum 2018-02-26
Ask accredited scientists with peer reviewed publications on the topic, not a group of people with interests in opposing view points.
I agree that we as a society should question certain things for the sake of truthfulness but not arguing everything simply for the sake of it.
1 VeganSavage 2018-02-26
Peer review? LOL
1 Tookmyprawns 2018-02-26
Ya, a peer review.
1 VeganSavage 2018-02-26
http://www.wakingtimes.com/2018/02/19/scientific-peer-review-sham/
https://www.activistpost.com/2018/02/consensus-science-gold-standard-peer-reviews-fraudulent-bs-science.html
“We conclude that penises are not best understood as the male sexual organ, or as a male reproductive organ, but instead as an enacted social construct that is both damaging and problematic for society and future generations… and is the conceptual driver behind much of climate change.”
Peer reviewed studies are a gatekeeping strategy used by the cabal/deep state. Not only can they control the outflow of information by having ownership of the peer reviewing and funds/finances that produce such results, they can shape the narrative on multiple fronts by doing so.
In truth, the systemic failure of peer review is one of science’s major, embarrassing open secrets.
As Dr David Kaplan tells us, “[P]eer review is known to engender bias, incompetence, excessive expense, ineffectiveness, and corruption. A surfeit of publications has documented the deficiencies of this system.”
1 VeganSavage 2018-02-26
http://www.wakingtimes.com/2018/02/19/scientific-peer-review-sham/
https://www.activistpost.com/2018/02/consensus-science-gold-standard-peer-reviews-fraudulent-bs-science.html
“We conclude that penises are not best understood as the male sexual organ, or as a male reproductive organ, but instead as an enacted social construct that is both damaging and problematic for society and future generations… and is the conceptual driver behind much of climate change.”
Peer reviewed studies are a gatekeeping strategy used by the cabal/deep state. Not only can they control the outflow of information by having ownership of the peer reviewing and funds/finances that produce such results, they can shape the narrative on multiple fronts by doing so.
1 VeganSavage 2018-02-26
Nope, putting it in the drinking water is just a cheaper way if disposing the byproduct of fertilizer creation.
With the bonus effect of keeping the population docile and medicated.
Proof of the nefarious aspect is the lack of choice. It's in everything from tap water to coke.
1 screeyonk 2018-02-26
why is deliberately adding something to drinking water cheaper than just dumping it somewhere? and where does this whole 'fluoride keeps people docile' narrative come from?
1 VeganSavage 2018-02-26
Fluorosilicic acid cannot just be dumped anywhere, and has an extremely expensive disposal process.
It is a known neurotoxin.
watch the doco
"The truth about water"
1 Acatcalledpossum 2018-02-26
I've lived with fluoridated water. I am * ** definitely ** * not as docile as I should be.
1 VeganSavage 2018-02-26
You probably are.
1 Acatcalledpossum 2018-02-26
Haha thanks? I'm an angry pos more than I'd like to admit. I struggle with anger issues. Maybe i need more flouride?
1 VeganSavage 2018-02-26
Maybe one of the other chemicals in the daily onslaught is affecting you.
Also can't really blame you for being angry, who wouldn't be? I mean look around! You don't have to let it control you though, you have free will.
1 Nogrim6 2018-02-26
if you aren't angry considering all the bullshit that is going on, there is something wrong with you.
1 screeyonk 2018-02-26
if Big Fluorosilicic Acid is capable of convincing the public that it's safe to put in water I imagine they could convince the public hat it's safe to dispose of cheaply.
Lots of things are known neurotoxins. is fluoride neurotoxic at the levels encountered in drinking water? and even if it was, 'neurotoxin' =/= 'psychoactive'.
1 VeganSavage 2018-02-26
It is more toxic than rat poison. Forgive me for not wanting even a trace of it in my water. Or at the very least a CHOICE on whether or not to have it.
And please, do some research on it yourself before you come back with "prove it"
1 screeyonk 2018-02-26
again, lots of things are toxic, and there are lots of things in small amounts in water. And you do have a choice, as much as you have a choice in any government policy; you can vote against it or move to an area that doen't implement it. Or, you can choose not to use municipal water supply, or even treat it to remove fluoride.
1 VeganSavage 2018-02-26
Technically you have a choice, realistically you don't. It is every product like coke or pepsi that have water in it, and it is an expensive process, if not impossible to completely remove it. Why should I have to pay for an expensive process to remove something I didn't want in the first place?
Like vaccinations, technically you have a choice, but if you want your child to have any semblance of a life (go to school, join a sports team), you don't.
The lack of choice is the red flag, for me at least.
1 screeyonk 2018-02-26
society is built around the idea of giving up freedoms for various benefits. Murder is illegal for everyone. You can't opt out of that, even if you wanted other people to be able to murder you, too. If you have income or own property, you need to pay taxes. In exchange, you get the continued protection and benefits of government, but you can't forgo those. If the government orders you to, you have to serve on a jury or in the military, to maintain the country's justice and security interests, which at least SHOULD align with those of a 'normal' citizen.
You should be able to question the safety of fluoride, but questioning things isn't useful if you're already determined to answer "that's not true".
1 Mental-Cramp 2018-02-26
Did you really just compare the right to clean water to having a right to murder? You might want to check your logicometer. I think it might either be low on fluid or you might have some fluoride build up blocking the receptors.
If fluoride were beneficial to have in drinking water they'd package that shit as a supplimental additive and cash in... BUT it's not, so they give it to you for "free".
1 screeyonk 2018-02-26
I compared them because they are both, a "right" that someone could theoretically claim to have. and your second point isn't very convincing. "If fire departments were beneficial to property owners they'd sell that shit as a service and cash in... BUT they're not, so they give them to you for "free"."
1 Mental-Cramp 2018-02-26
You're comparing apples and oranges again.
One is a product that claims to help your teeth (when directly applied instead of ingested).
The other is a life saving service which is generally viewed as a must have by every govt in the world. In fact, in the US it is a must if considering a township.
If the govt cares so much about my teeth, why won't they help me get em fixed? One could have to come out of pocket 10's of thousands to have their mouth corrected which in turn might save their life but the taxpayers will foot the bill on the property damage, jaws of life, lifeflight/ambulance every single time. It's because one is considered within the govts responsibilities to defend life, liberty, and property and the other isn't. Can you guess which is which?
1 Loose-ends 2018-02-26
If you'd ever read this you'd never have needed to ask... https://sheeppee.wordpress.com/2011/07/19/free-e-book-the-fluoride-deception-by-christopher-bryson/
1 Nogrim6 2018-02-26
safe? well it won't kill you, but it does make you dumber.
1 its_spelled_Hawaiian 2018-02-26
Yes, the government cares about our teeth sooo so much they automatically put it in our tap water for free! Fuckin awesome people huh? /s
1 zachthebudtender 2018-02-26
Kills yer pineal gland, guy. Y’all need that shit for consciousness n stuff.
1 mindboglin 2018-02-26
Different countries take different approaches.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluoridation_by_country
1 HelperBot_ 2018-02-26
Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluoridation_by_country
HelperBot v1.1 /r/HelperBot_ I am a bot. Please message /u/swim1929 with any feedback and/or hate. Counter: 153711
1 bittermanscolon 2018-02-26
Harvard did a study. 22 year study in China that shows it reduced the IQ of children.
Perfect for keeping people exactly where they are. Running the machine so the people in control can stay in control.
I don't call that "safe" by any means unless you are one of the .1%.
1 Oof_too_Humid 2018-02-26
Only if you don't put it in your body, or the water supply, or places where it might get into your body or the water supply.
1 VeganSavage 2018-02-26
You probably are.