Is it really such a hard thing to notice the connection between a member of the Washington D.C. establishment finally losing an election, and the immediate start of a campaign to delegitimize the person who beat her?
46 2018-02-26 by [deleted]
[deleted]
63 comments
1 NothingLasts 2018-02-26
Criticism of DT as incompetent precede the election date, as does the collusion conspiracy. What "immediate" campaign began after his victory?
1 MMLMFAO 2018-02-26
Show me a single article pushing the Trump-Russia connection that was published before his campaign run.
1 NothingLasts 2018-02-26
You said "immediate" after losing the election, not after beginning his campaign.
1 MMLMFAO 2018-02-26
Fair enough, now show me a single article pushing the Trump-Russia connection that was published before Hillary lost.
1 ArsonMcManus 2018-02-26
Hillary called him Putin's puppet in a debate, to his face.
1 MMLMFAO 2018-02-26
That only gives my theory more support. She started planting the seeds in a nationally televised debate. A smart move if you know you have a contingency plan based on Trump-Russia.
1 jeromocles 2018-02-26
So her contingency plan is Mike Pence?
You asked for evidence, it was provided, and now you're shifting your original assertion.
Bag of rocks.
1 MMLMFAO 2018-02-26
Her contingency plan was activating a Trump-Russia hysteria narrative if she lost. I think a person like Hillary only cares about revenge on the person who beat her. Pence would simply be an after-thought in the matter.
1 ArsonMcManus 2018-02-26
You're utterly convinced of your narrative and when faced with evidence to the contrary, you'll shape it to fit your worldview. No point in creating this thread if you can't handle a debate.
1 IllFunck 2018-02-26
What evidence?
The evidence that proves his initial point even more? Yeah cool thx
1 ArsonMcManus 2018-02-26
You're a textbook example of what I was describing
1 NothingLasts 2018-02-26
I'm not sure how you could have avoided seeing any of those articles unless you were literally living under a rock for 2016-2017, but here's some about supicious electronic communication :
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/cover_story/2016/10/was_a_server_registered_to_the_trump_organization_communicating_with_russia.html
Here's one from August 2016 about his connections with Russian interests:
http://time.com/4433880/donald-trump-ties-to-russia/
Another from July 2016:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/heres-what-we-know-about-donald-trump-and-his-ties-to-russia/2016/07/29/1268b5ec-54e7-11e6-88eb-7dda4e2f2aec_story.html?utm_term=.cce28ab03a9a
1 -covfefe 2018-02-26
I haven't got an article but the FBI was already investigating Trump's team in July 2016.
http://imgur.com/ltfgeVw.png
1 MMLMFAO 2018-02-26
Again, none of this was mentioned to the public until Hillary lost.
1 -covfefe 2018-02-26
That's usually how criminal investigations work!
Anyway here's a couple from "before Hillary lost"
http://www.foreignpolicyi.org/content/fpi-conference-call-russian-interference-foreign-elections
https://www.thenation.com/article/we-should-be-shocked-shocked-at-reports-of-russian-interference-in-us-elections/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/07/26/why-would-russia-interfere-in-the-u-s-election-because-it-usually-works/
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/oct/07/us-russia-dnc-hack-interfering-presidential-election
1 MMLMFAO 2018-02-26
1: no mention of anything remotely related to Trump.
2: this article is focused on what Trump said in the debate, and goes on to mock the entire idea of Russia "swinging" our election
3: this article actually mocks the idea of American's being outraged over election interference
4: post-election article date
1 -covfefe 2018-02-26
The 4th article is before the election too, do you know how dates work?
Sounds to me like you just want to suck off Donald Trump mate so I'm just gonna let you get that dick. Go on.
1 MMLMFAO 2018-02-26
Yes, I misread the date. I also looked for a single mention of Trump and even used the -find- feature. Zero instances of the word Trump.
You sound like a real winner.
1 -covfefe 2018-02-26
That's it, get it nice and deep in there, feels good, right?
1 JamesColesPardon 2018-02-26
Removed. Rules 4 and 5.
1 JamesColesPardon 2018-02-26
Removed. Rule 4.
1 -covfefe 2018-02-26
Except it was already known Russia was supporting Trump months before the election ended.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/russian-officials-overheard-discussing-trump-associates-before-campaign-began-1499890354
1 MMLMFAO 2018-02-26
The date of that article is July 12, 2017.
1 -covfefe 2018-02-26
Your powers of observation are astonishing.
1 MMLMFAO 2018-02-26
Thanks. Its not hard to figure out that an article written in 2017 was published after the election results.
1 -covfefe 2018-02-26
Thanks here's confirmation the FBI was investigating Trump months before the election thanks.
http://imgur.com/ltfgeVw.png
1 MMLMFAO 2018-02-26
Still waiting for a single published article written before Hillary lost.
1 -covfefe 2018-02-26
Here you go buddy
http://www.foreignpolicyi.org/content/fpi-conference-call-russian-interference-foreign-elections
For future reference Google is quite useful!
1 MMLMFAO 2018-02-26
And not a single mention of Trump's name in that entire article. Or anyone even remotely related to Trump.
You just posted an article that says Russia meddles in elections. Everybody already knew that.
1 -covfefe 2018-02-26
Oh my you are a hard gentleman to please!
Do you remember your title?
Your title says Hillary made up the Russia stuff immediately after she lost.
I just proved you wrong.
It's ok just go back to sleep, I'm sure the whole Russia thing will just blow over.
1 MMLMFAO 2018-02-26
My title says that the Trump-Russia smear campaign was activated because Hillary lost.
You still haven't posted a single article that written about Trump-Russia before Hillary lost. And I am sure you are desperately trying to find one.
1 -covfefe 2018-02-26
Ok, if the Russia investigation is a smear campaign started after Hillary lost...
How come the FBI was investigating Trump in early 2016?
Fucking time travelling smear campaigners!
Lol
1 MMLMFAO 2018-02-26
So, still no article huh?
1 -covfefe 2018-02-26
So still talking our your ass eh?
1 TrumpTrainFullSteam 2018-02-26
Name one election Hillary Clinton ever won? Exactly. She got her seat because JFK jr died. Shes never been elected. She was appointed SoS.
1 CelineHagbard 2018-02-26
New York Senate seat, 2000 and 2006.
1 Glass_wall 2018-02-26
Lemme Google that for you...
1 DontTreadOnMe16 2018-02-26
“Died in a plane crash”...
1 beatvox 2018-02-26
It's easier to bribe the electoral college than the entire population. Thank the rubles
1 Weareone2 2018-02-26
Wow. You think Russia actually bribed out electorate?
1 beatvox 2018-02-26
Absolutely, via intermediaries. Let's see what Mueller pulls out of guilty pleas. I hope it's nothing...the outcome of that being true will be bad.
1 DontTreadOnMe16 2018-02-26
Do you think that is specific to just one party though?
1 beatvox 2018-02-26
no...parties are for people to argue over. Divide et Impera.
1 Weareone2 2018-02-26
Yeah basically. :(
1 ArsonMcManus 2018-02-26
If Donald Trump wasn't utterly incompetent, then your theory might hold water. It is undeniable that Trump doesn't really understand his role in government so I'm not surprised people are attacking him.
1 MMLMFAO 2018-02-26
Are you expecting me to defend Trump now? Guess what? He is incompetent. He doesn't understand how to be a politician.
Now can we get back to the actual point I make in the headline?
1 CottonBalls26 2018-02-26
If you're a just another Russian troll, you really suck at it
1 MMLMFAO 2018-02-26
Yes, everybody with a different opinion is Russian. Any thoughts on the headline?
1 morsy 2018-02-26
It's so funny that people think there's a conspiracy to discredit DT, as if they completely forgot the complete shit show his first few months were.
Remember the crazy press conferences? How insulting he was to our allies? His crazy speeches to the US and while abroad? The whirlwind of staff being replaced/appointed? The unconstitutional executive orders he kept trying to do? The insane tweets he continues to send out? There's too much to mention, he truly baffled us with bullshit.
All of this while countless bombshell reports come out about his and his campaigns shady shit. All of this he personally instigated.
Fact is he's a shit President and doesn't come close to being able to handle the responsibilities that come with it. Sorry that reporters live to expose that shit.
1 MMLMFAO 2018-02-26
Yes, Trump sucks. We get it. That horse has been beaten to death.
Now lets actually discuss the idea that there would be no Trump-Russia hysteria if Trump had lost.
1 morsy 2018-02-26
Who knows what would have happened. Trump probably would have seen the blatant Russian meddling band would have called it all 'Rigged'.
Any investigation probably wouldn't be open like now (unless Republicans would have driven it, which I don't put past them), but I doubt the investigation into Manafort and Russia's influence in the election would have stopped had Hillary gotten elected.
1 MMLMFAO 2018-02-26
Fair point. But today's shouted narrative isn't called the Manafort-Russia scandal, its called the Trump-Russia scandal.
1 morsy 2018-02-26
Yes, and Manafoet was a campaign manager for Trump. Add Trump's glaring guilty behavior and it's hard not to connect the two.
1 LawrenceRigbyEsquire 2018-02-26
I don't get it, when you become president you are immediately put under extreme scrutiny. That's quite normal, why didn't they stop this before? Because no one thought the egotistical buffoon would win, and before he won he was just an idiot with big ties to russia, but when you become the president the song changes. I don't know how that's so hard to fathom, it's not about Hillary losing, it's about him becoming president with this baggage
1 IllFunck 2018-02-26
Unless your the first black Muslim president.. then the Left wing media will sukk your dick for 8 years straight after Michael Michelle is done with it.
But nah, Obama is such a nice trustworthy man that gives the most wonderful speeches.. Yayyy
1 ABigBigThug 2018-02-26
Successful crimes get more attention than attempted and failed ones.
1 EccentricRichAndSexy 2018-02-26
All the manafuck charges could suck in Trump yet
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4385691/2-22-18-US-Status-Report.pdf
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4385690/2-22-18-Manafort-Gates-Indictment-EDVA.pdf
1 echo_ex_astris 2018-02-26
If he'd lost, there wouldn't be much point. It's same reason nobody outside of Fox News really cares about Hillary Clinton right now, she's out of the picture.
1 Magnus_Konrad 2018-02-26
No, but when all you see is red it's hard to make out the obvious right in front of you, and green makes a hell of a motivator in keeping outrage stoked.
1 mdaniel018 2018-02-26
I don’t know where this narrative comes from. Eyebrows were certainly raised when Manafort came on, as he has very well known ties with powerful Russians and other authoritative governments, and was an odd choice to head a campaign. The episode at the Republican convention, with the change in policy on Ukraine being the only thing in the party platform that the Trump team seemed interested in and their weird denials afterwords, caused the first widespread speculation that something weird was going on.
There were also many on Reddit who questioned why the front page of r/politics was dominated by stories from Sputnik news, RT news, and even Breitbart that were virulently pro-Sanders and attacked Clinton, often with what we have now come to call Fake News. Not to say that there aren’t plenty of things to attack Hillary for, but these articles typically went far past the realm of face and into blatant misinformation. Strangely, they all disappeared the moment the Sanders campaign shut down.
1 Dunkadoobar 2018-02-26
This must be the first election you have paid any attention to. Welcome to our world; it’s not just the other side that is evil.
1 kutwijf 2018-02-26
It's not that they're trying to deligitimize him. They don't need to. He's bad enough. It's that they're using him and Russia to take the focus off themselves and keep people busy, while they astroturf in an attempt to get control of things and fix their image by rewriting history.
1 kutwijf 2018-02-26
It's not that they're trying to deligitimize him. They don't need to. He's bad enough. It's that they're using him and Russia to take the focus off themselves and keep people busy, while they astroturf social media and push propaganda in an attempt to manipulate public opinion and fix their image by rewriting history.
1 Weareone2 2018-02-26
Wow. You think Russia actually bribed out electorate?
1 MMLMFAO 2018-02-26
Again, none of this was mentioned to the public until Hillary lost.
1 MMLMFAO 2018-02-26
That only gives my theory more support. She started planting the seeds in a nationally televised debate. A smart move if you know you have a contingency plan based on Trump-Russia.
1 MMLMFAO 2018-02-26
My title says that the Trump-Russia smear campaign was activated because Hillary lost.
You still haven't posted a single article that written about Trump-Russia before Hillary lost. And I am sure you are desperately trying to find one.
1 -covfefe 2018-02-26
The 4th article is before the election too, do you know how dates work?
Sounds to me like you just want to suck off Donald Trump mate so I'm just gonna let you get that dick. Go on.
1 MMLMFAO 2018-02-26
Yes, everybody with a different opinion is Russian. Any thoughts on the headline?
1 IllFunck 2018-02-26
Unless your the first black Muslim president.. then the Left wing media will sukk your dick for 8 years straight after Michael Michelle is done with it.
But nah, Obama is such a nice trustworthy man that gives the most wonderful speeches.. Yayyy