My guess it was a combination of things. I bet there were more masks Kubrick had made that identified more people. They kept the gold Bob Hope mask and of course all the others, but there was probably way more.

They probably had way more (much worse) stuff on the kids, too. And as OP says, sacrifices of adults/children. They go there a bit with the under the rainbow rental shop, but there was probably much more they had to take out after clipping Stanley.

Normal human sacrifices wouldn't be a big deal though, imo. We see that stuff in other movies all the time. There had to be some sort of raw connection he made that had to be delete.

Damn I really wanna watch those videos. Happen to know where else I can still find them since they’ve been unsurprisingly removed from YouTube?

If you regard Stanley Kubrick as this conspiracy mastermind who's only method of communication regarding the top secret stuff he knew was through subtle, subconscious hints in his films, do you think he's looking down at this thread from beyond the grave and is thinking "I did a really good job"?

Don't forget helping fake moon landings

Eyes Wide Shut premiered on the 30th anniversary of the Apollo 11 mission.

The Apollo footage is laughable garbage. I can jump higher here on Earth.

what about it specifically?

How about this tiny fircracker that lauches tons of metal in the air.

Does it look like 1/6 of this?

uh, there's no air on the moon, so burn off would appear to look a lot less..

A lot less? Looks like an M80 in a mailbox. :/

So you’re agreeing with me? You set off an m80, where the wick is in a climate controlled enclosed area, you wouldn’t see anything afterwards, as no oxygen exist to create the fire on the outside environment we would see on earth

No I think it is a sad studio attempt, not to mention the caneraman left on the moon following the shot. Some say he is still there today :/

https://io9.gizmodo.com/how-nasa-captured-this-iconic-footage-of-apollo-17-leav-1671650186

So they used a studio without any air in it? That sounds complicated. They could also go to the moon and also have no air.

When did I say there was no air in the studio? You are mixing my comments with others

You can tell its real because it looks so fake 😁

I don't think Kubrick was behind the moon landings if they were staged, at most NASA consulted with him about what camera angles to use. The guy had a very interesting life but one thing I noticed is throughout his whole career even as a photographer, he definitely exuded a certain attitude that said "I am the last guy in the room you want to fuck with" so in no reality do I see a government funded organization like nasa running to this guy (a brilliant auteur director who has a real problem with authority) to see if he wants to be involved in the most elaborate hoax in recorded history

Creating a vacuum = less complicated than travelling to the Moon and back.

Slow clap

I've seen B movies with much better effects

There is a difference between what you perceive as good effects and what things would actually look like in a foreign environment such as the moon, which you have no experience with.

Most space-related special effects are wrong on several levels.

Oh have you been to the moon? I'm glad someone with personal experience dropped in.

It's fake as fuck. Idiot Freemasons on wires. Not 1/6th gravity leaping huge distances.

You know they "lost" the tapes of the moon walk, right?

1) https://www.reuters.com/article/us-nasa-tapes/moon-landing-tapes-got-erased-nasa-admits-idUSTRE56F5MK20090716

2) https://www.npr.org/2009/07/16/106637066/houston-we-erased-the-apollo-11-tapes

And you know current astronauts say we can't go to the moon anymore, right?

1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nX_QsRJx1J4&t=1m45s

2) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16MMZJlp_0Y

And, though this isn't "proof" of anything, it is strange. The body language of the astronauts, and really the whole ordeal, of the post moon landing press conference....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BI_ZehPOMwI&t=51m40s

Just some stuff to think about

You posed two questions there that are completely unrelated, yet you tried to cojoin the two into one query of idiotic buffoonery.

Maybe try to put more effort in internetting next time.

Seems like you're the only one who didn't understand it. Try putting more effort into reading comprehension next time

haha, judging by the downvotes, it is actually you, who still doesn't get it.

You can downvote me all you want, it doesn't negate you from looking like an idiot

i never downvoted you. the reddit community did because you are a buffoon. it's written across your forehead. have a look in the mirror.

There is no missing 24 minutes. Just an internet rumor that keeps being repeated.

:)

Do you have any evidence of that, because as far as I know it's not true.

I also doubt it would be about Adrenochrome. You couldn't explain that to an audience in that time and it doesn't fit with the rest of the story.

Where's your proof?

Yes, a few minutes on Adrenochrome in F&L, and no one noticed and no one got killed over it. Because it's pretty much a myth.

Shifting the goalposts, Mr. Gaslight. You just said it would take too long and not fit with the movie, which was easily dismantled above. Then you act like that proves your point.

You said the information would get someone killed and then gave an example of it not getting people killed.

You've given no proof 24 minutes have been removed, despite being asked multiple times.

Are you sure about that?

Changing the subject constantly, slippery like an eel.

And avoided it again ...

I think that's you, since you still haven't provided any evidence and keep talking around it :p

It's not

I also doubt it would be about Adrenochrome

You're right - it's adenochrome, as in adenosine.

It's post likes these that help keep /r/conspiracy a joke, and not something that gets taken seriously.

5 days later

5 days later than what? The release date, the date the scenes were cut?

What research? What would tom cruise going into a room with a human sacrifice in a scene from a movie cause Kubrick to have a heart attack?

You know movies are fiction right?

iirc, he made a movie called adrenochrome and this is his way of publicizing it. so yeah, he should know movies are fiction

You know movies are fiction right?

There's a form of movie called a documentary that is not fiction.

this guy still doesn't get it.

Yes, but this one isn't.

Rule 10

You are correct, Tom saves the life of the girl at the start then she sacrifice herself to save Tom's life at the party.

https://torontofilmreview.blogspot.ca/2014/12/the-missing-boat-scene-from-eyes-wide.html

https://torontofilmreview.blogspot.ca/2014/12/the-missing-boat-scene-from-eyes-wide.html

Link is down, but it was archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20151020005037/https://torontofilmreview.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-missing-boat-scene-from-eyes-wide.html

Adrenochrome is BS, it has been admitted on several occasions that the drug from Fear and Loathing, it's portrayal and backstory provided in the film/novel are entirely fictional. There is a real substance called adrenochrome that is very easy to synthesize from readily available and cheap over the counter drugs and its effects are both less pleasant and less impressive than those of actual drugs like Methamphetamine, Cocaine, or even LSD.

Adrenochrome is BS

There is a real substance called adrenochrome

Reading comp must be too much for your little bitch brain. If you read the words around those two parts and had a brain cell to process them you'd realize that you are being dumb.

TRIGGERED

I recently came into a large amount of money and as a result I don't have to work, although I do, in fact my grandkids grandkids will probably not have to work.

I'm doing fine, it's pretty hard to feel strongly about anything at this point, but you are still dumb and that makes me laugh.

hippie checking in: Ive seen just about every drug out there. Done most of them. Except adrenochrome. Never seen it or heard of anyone who has seen it.

One time at a club I had one guy point to another and said he was on it. The way he acted seemed to match the effects, but could have been any kind of speed really.

It's adenochrome, from adenosine, a neurotransmitter that mimics the functions of a poor man's seratonin.

I dunno man, Hunter S. Thompson was in heavy drug circles. He said on tape on a takk show he enjoys killing for fun. "He must have been joking!" well I don't make excuses for powerful people when their suspicious tells start adding up.

I believe there were scenes with Leelee Sobieski, cut. The parts with the father, Japanese buisinessmen and more. There's a boat scene with Cruise and Kidman, as well as more of the Mansion Party and the model. I'm sure there's more (considering 24 minutes is quite significant), but that's what I've heard.

Pizzagate, basically.

From what I understand about movie making, 24 minutes isnt that much film to have been left on the cutting room floor.

This is 24 mins of a completed film not footage. It's the difference between the directors cut and the theatrical release.

My gut instinct tells me this has something to do with Adrenochrome

Adenochrome, like adenosine.

I don't think it makes sense in the narrative of the film for Tom Cruise's character to have seem something like human sacrifice at the party. He doesn't know what happened to the woman that spoke up for him and it's only when he sees the article in the paper about her overdose that he begins to suspect they were capable of murder, let alone ritualistic sacrifice.

This is a very intriguing subject about an equally intriguing movie. I wish we could see what the cut 24min was but as others have pointed out, that's really not a whole lot to omit from a movie that already has a hefty run-time.

yes, but there r rumors around kubric's death. the 2 main kubric theories r that he faked the original moon landing, the second is all things 'eyes wide shut'.

i agree that the sacrifice just doesn't fit thematically.

the word is that kubric was maybe killed because kubric gave up just a little too much.

the occult does want us to know what they r doing, but only according to their plans.

see the principal called 'externalizing the mystery' Lucius trust (originally lucifer trust). their end goal is the open worship of lucifer and his anti-christ in a global control grid.

its the prophecy of the bible only inverted.

They cut the shot where you see Podesta eating children.

LOOOOL YES

At least on the book doesn't happen anything else than what the film includes. So my guess is that the orgy ball scene was way longer, making it almost a porn movie.

The screenplay can be found online, there's little difference with the final product.

To film a scene you require dozens of people, don't you think there would be already info related with the deleted scenes because of that?

It's not shoking that a film gets footage cut off, specially if it's longer than three hours.

The screenplay can be found online, there's little difference with the final product.

To film a scene you require dozens of people, don't you think there would be already info related with the deleted scenes because of that?

The screenplay could have been edited before being released. All the crew that worked on the movie had to sign non-disclosure agreements.

These are my assumptions as to why they were deleted. Overall, it had to do with the Hardfords prostituting their daughter to the elites.
At the end of the film, it appears the girl goes with two mean in suits, these same two men were at the dinner party at the beginning of the movies. It cuts away before it shows anything.
Another was probably that Leelee was only 16 at the time and if memory serves correctly that she had a nude scene that was cut.
My guess would be that we see the party with all the masks, it's weird, naked people walking around, the secrecy, the chanting, then he sees a room where kids are being traded to adults. The "Room" scene that was cut.

There is a scene where Nicole Kidman and her daughter are riding horse back, probably discussing selling her to the elites, and another where they are in a boat, most likely at the ending of the movie because of his sweater. My guess would be that they are now apart of this society and what they had to sacrifice was their family.

this guy still doesn't get it.

I recently came into a large amount of money and as a result I don't have to work, although I do, in fact my grandkids grandkids will probably not have to work.

I'm doing fine, it's pretty hard to feel strongly about anything at this point, but you are still dumb and that makes me laugh.

So you’re agreeing with me? You set off an m80, where the wick is in a climate controlled enclosed area, you wouldn’t see anything afterwards, as no oxygen exist to create the fire on the outside environment we would see on earth

Yes, but this one isn't.