If the Politics sub is the sub for political posts... why didn’t they allow direct submissions to Wikileaks in the 2016 election? Why did reddit users have to go to this sub or T_D to find posts with direct links to Wikileaks?
94 2018-03-10 by Democratsaresmarter
It seems odd that users couldnt go to the Politics sub to discuss the Podesta emails without having to go to a thread that was a link to a journalists opinion of the content Wikileaks released. Why did this sub become a battleground for the left & the right? Was it by admin design?
139 comments
1 Willlworkforbeer 2018-03-10
The Donald forced it's way onto the front page and demanded attention, then banned anyone who tried to engage with them. I think this sub became a boogey man, but I honestly don't have a lot of sympathy for the "how did every sub become political" arguement.
1 machocamacho88 2018-03-10
Because the purpose of that sub is to promote the agenda of the DNC.
1 sock_lover 2018-03-10
Politics is the Hillary/dem sub, so not odd at all tbh
1 Democratsaresmarter 2018-03-10
Then they should be forced to change the name of it.
1 notmyrealaccountlad 2018-03-10
It really is, isn't it? Even the conspiracy community has been infiltrated. You have a few machines that lay the foundation, and then real people finish the house. Calling everyone with an opposing view point a shill is rapidly deteriorating online discussions in communities that were once somewhat civil.
Oddly enough, this discourse is the result from actual shilling. Rather than it being us vs them it's me vs you. Things are getting bad, and we're not winning "them".
1 TucanSamBitch 2018-03-10
She's not a fascist lol, neither is Trump for that matter but that's besides the point.
Sure maybe you can be liberal and votes for Trump for some reason. But if you continue to support him and his policies, which are strictly right wing, then no, you're not a liberal, I'm not sure why this is difficult to understand.
1 jeffroyo 2018-03-10
What? That is actually a legit pic of mods there? No way.
1 Read_books_1984 2018-03-10
Disagree completely. This is more of the bullshit about there being a division on the left. We have disagreements but on most policy issues we agree. Most moderates want some form of universal coverage, drug legalization, infrastructure support, and gun control. There's not much of a division, except on the internet where often harmless remarks get mistranslated.
1 Read_books_1984 2018-03-10
Okay but we know wikileaks was working with the Trump campaign. That's all been verified. Whether Trump knew, idk, but other people did. Why should people be allowed to link to a known conspirator to defraud the United states? Next people will insist pizzagate theories should have been allowed on the sub. Certain entities are not to be trusted with information sharing, and Wikileaks has fallen greatly in stature from when it appeared to be working on behalf of the people.
1 kyoujikishin 2018-03-10
Feeling like /r/mandelaeffect with all this misremembering going on then
1 kyoujikishin 2018-03-10
Sure, but the belief that this was some overnight "switch flipped" performance that took over politics instead of a generally left wing sub supporting the most likely left wing candidate to win is just silly. I have asked multiple times for any evidence of it and have only been met with comments along the lines of "we don't need proof, we remember it alright" which leads me to believe its completely false and just radicalizing people.
1 bradok 2018-03-10
People can criticize HRC but if you want to stick around in any of the default subs or the bigger subs like r/politics...GLHF with talking about the Truth concerning HRC, the Primaries, or 2016 in general. There were no good options, HRC is a terrible person, and Bernie should have been the nominee. But to give HRC and the DNC the criticism they deserve is met with accusations of "RUSSIA" and "RIGHT WINGER", especially if you criticize them from the Left, which is really, really, really easy to do.
1 towels_gone_wild 2018-03-10
And when they got that, they found a new way to deflect criticism and responsibility.
1 towels_gone_wild 2018-03-10
No, it's a Fascist echo chamber.
1 towels_gone_wild 2018-03-10
I see that as a good thing, lets readers know that they are not safe and secure with any side.
1 towels_gone_wild 2018-03-10
Couldn't be more on point.
1 jargonoid 2018-03-10
What's the difference?
1 3074326 2018-03-10
Except here. Its just a right wing circle jerk in here.
It's a shame what this forum (and Reddit, yes due to the left wing jerking session like you said) overall has become.
1 CasinoReality117 2018-03-10
r/politics and other big subs were taken over by NEOliberal (economically very right wing to extreme right wing) corporate shills for Clinton/DNC/Soros/corporations (e.g. mon saanto, big pharma, etc.).
Most politicians in the modern Democrat party are not left wing, centrist or even moderate right and haven't been for decades (Reagan onwards: things went downhill). Get money out of politics and you'll get decent representatives and not NEOliberal shills pretending to be left wing. We can at least get centrists and not fake centrists, ya know (just sayin)? Also nationalizing the FED, and getting rid of freemasons would help us clean the government ("drain the swamp").
The Democrat and Republican parties are both funded by corporations (incl. military-industrial complex), banksters, wallstreet, etc. Neither party is "moderate". The corporate media pretends "between Democrat and Republican" is moderate but being in between two similarly corporate extremist parties is still extreme.
They're all extremists. Bernie was an independent who ran as a Democrat and thus was a rare exception and tried to bring back FDR's near-centrist New Deal mixed economics (social democracy: fair market capitalism + untampered social programs with no corporate interference or at least well regulated against profiteering cronyist scams).
I also want to remind the sub that "THE LEFT"/"THE RIGHT" is language we should ideally avoid because it's A) divisive, B) prone to extremely broad generalizations, C) what some think is left/right is not actually left/right respectively and centrism is also ignored for some strange reason, D) everyone on the left half of the spectrum is a leftist, but people seem to confuse left wing with SJW/feminist/"white privilege" brainwashed people lol. This just increases the divide and conquer agenda's power.
Saying left wingers are SJWs is like saying right wingers are racists. Not everyone who is left/right wing is SJW/racist. The whole SJW vs alt right or whatever is divide and conquer.
LET ME REPEAT TO ASLEEP PEOPLE: CLINTON IS NOT LEFT WING, DAMNIT. People to the left of Clinton are fucking centrists and moderate right! Clinton is an extremist who (secretly) wanted TPP for goodness sake (she pretended to change her mind but come on, wallstreet was breathing down her corrupt neck). Left wingers are pro-worker and anti-corporate/banking corruption.
Obama's 2008 promises:
https://i.imgur.com/ZoyXgH4.png
Obama's actual 2012 policies:
https://i.imgur.com/JNncCRE.png
Sanders:
https://i.imgur.com/1peIWYG.png
Jill Stein VS pro-TPP shill Gary Johnson:
https://www.politicalcompass.org/images/us2016.png
What the elites are probably trying to do:
https://i.imgur.com/bNz2DHP.jpg
1 kyoujikishin 2018-03-10
I've been asking for proof this entire these, I'm welcoming any proof you can actually bring up. Not my fault the lack of evidence is appallingly scarce.
1 CasinoReality117 2018-03-10
Thanks for the support my friend. :) Keep spreading the truth!
1 TooManyCookz 2018-03-10
Prove it! /s