They mocked the mini-CNN journalist that was already making social media posts about banning guns while still hiding under a desk while the shooting was happening.

Real people know that the alt right is literally about 200 people. Nothing to even concern yourself with. Even less impressive than antifa, which is hard to do.

Are those the people you consider alt-right?

Unite The Right was an alt-right event and there were quite a few more than 200 people there.

No it's not. You obviously don't even know what the alt right claims to be in their own words. It's just another term to throw around in an attempt to delegitimize anyone you disagree with. It's no different than calling everyone Nazis.

People can understand what you're saying, but it's a ridiculous left-wing talking point.

/u/techntoke your never supposed to go full retard

brainwashed by racist neoconservative colonialist parents

LMFAO, you almost started telling me about platitudes and how Communism has never really been tried. Whew!

colonialist=Conquer

The Tea Party movement and the people at Trump rallies stand for liberty, Constitutional rights, and responsible government spending. The label for these people is "normal Americans."

The right has a serious victim complex going on. Running a campaign on "liberal tears" can only go so far before it will come back and bite you. It's sophistry and hyperbole on steroids

The left has an over-dependence on AI amplified public relations campaigns, indiscriminately unleashed on the public of all partisanship leaning for any statement not lock-step in line with the key narratives of the day. High frequency of false positives then exposes people that otherwise would be a Dem voter to abuse and name calling on line if they dare the criminal offense of arguing for additional items in the platform, different direction for key issues, offering critical feedback that would improve the Dem messaging, or taking issue with any of the leadership. The rabid attacks that quickly follow get noticed. It's like training a dog to pee on a pad, they go and pee outside on the grass, but the action was unexpected and the tool registers failure and whacks it with a newspaper anyway. That's some real behavioralist conditioning reinforced over and over and over again. It's creating massive changes in the voter population that will requite years to decondition again.

The left has an over-dependence on AI amplified public relations campaigns, indiscriminately unleashed on the public of all partisanship leaning for any statement not lock-step in line with the key narratives of the day.

Yet we have actual proof of the right doing this and falling for it with Cambridge Anyalitica. Just like with the ReleaseTheMemo twitter campaign being pushed by bots. Same with right wingers sharing and retweeting, now proven, Russian propaganda accounts.

High frequency of false positives then exposes people that otherwise would be a Dem voter to abuse and name calling on line if they dare the criminal offense of arguing for additional items in the platform, different direction for key issues, offering critical feedback that would improve the Dem messaging, or taking issue with any of the leadership. The rabid attacks that quickly follow get noticed. It's like training a dog to pee on a pad, they go and pee outside on the grass, but the action was unexpected and the tool registers failure and whacks it with a newspaper anyway. That's some real behavioralist conditioning reinforced over and over and over again. It's creating massive changes in the voter population that will requite years to decondition again.

More nonsense hyperbole. Should have added that the right are masters of projection, it's scary how accruate the projection is as well. Almost like they are self aware of what they do so they assume everyone else is as dishonest as them

Yet we have actual proof of the right doing this and falling for it with Cambridge Anyalitica.

Do you?

In general the threat of Russian bots and boogeyman pirates hiding under the bed has been greatly over estimated. They're your neighbors, coworkers, and often Sanders supporters or prior Dems more often than not.

But there's an alignment in Silicon Valley that holds a lot of weight for particular political objectives. I'd imagine the offices over at Google can with trivial effort produce tools to make a very loud noise.

Yet we have actual proof of the right doing this and falling for it with Cambridge Anyalitica.

Do you?

Video proof actually

https://www.channel4.com/news/exposed-undercover-secrets-of-donald-trump-data-firm-cambridge-analytica

https://www.channel4.com/news/cambridge-analytica-revealed-trumps-election-consultants-filmed-saying-they-use-bribes-and-sex-workers-to-entrap-politicians-investigation

In general the threat of Russian bots and boogeyman pirates hiding under the bed has been greatly over estimated.

Are you even capable of not talking on hyperbole? You must know of the indictments that show it was a huge state sponsored operation. Which is seperate from the Cambridge Analytica news we've recieved.

But there's an alignment in Silicon Valley that holds a lot of weight for particular political objectives.

Yeah silicone valley leans left, it's in no way comparable to the propaganda machine of talk radio and fox news opinion shows

I'd imagine the offices over at Google can with trivial effort produce tools to make a very loud noise.

How about proof instead of going with your feelings

The alt right is like 200 people.

Have a great day.

I'd argue that alt-right is a poorly defined phrase whose members shift to fit any situation it would be convenient to dismiss argument with a label.

I don't believe there has ever been a "staged" school shooting. I do think that your point about the "alt-right" jumping on the school shooting in Maryland shows that these events should not be politicized by either party.

Furthermore, it shows the issue of creating legislation from a state of emotion, instead of a state of logic.

I'm not "alt-right" but I haven't decided what I think it was yet.

I think it is weird that right after the Austin bombings we have a shooter named Austin.

Doesn’t the Maryland shooting highlight how less damage a shooter can do when they have a handgun vs an assault style weapon like an AR?

In both instances the schools had someone armed. The only difference was that the person that defended the students in Maryland was going against someone with equal sized weapon. Whereas the Florida Sheriff that was on campus didn’t go into face the attacker because he was outgunned.

caliber means nothing when person or officer is trained and shooter is not. cops in florida were either cowards or purposely told to stand down for nefarious reasons.

Disagree with "the only difference" part here. From what I understand about the Maryland incident the shooter had two specific targets in mind due to relationship difficulties. Correct me if I'm wrong. If that is the case then the shooter doesn't appear to have the "intent" to shoot anyone else.

From my understanding as well, you are correct. It’s not complete apples to apples and it was probably misleading for me to phrase it that way. There were certainly unique in there own way.

Im mostly just trying to make a point that the difference in the guns used, played a factor. I don’t think you can compare the two shooting to determine the difference between having unarmed vs armed teachers

You make a valid point regarding the gun used in the Maryland incident possibly playing a part in the decision by the armed security guard to engage.

There's a reason the term "equalizer" is used frequently by LEO's and military personnel.

I would also think the armed security guard thought about the Parkland incident very briefly before engaging. Who wouldn't in their situation?

Parkland was an obvious false flag. I've seen no evidence that Marylabd was.

Stretch much?

I'm not exactly bought into the whole crisis actors thing, although the poor kids are being used to some degree, but whatever they are making their mark on the world.
A few random answers/discussion:
Conspiracy theory does not equal alt-right. There are plenty of conspiracy theories against alt-right as well.
Now, in this case, the shooting you're referring to today seems pretty cut and dry. https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/20/us/maryland-school-shooting-resource-officer-response-trnd/index.html Simple, clean. We have all parties involved. Everyone accounted for. No real questions need answering, we have even a very real motive. Only real question is who shot the assailant, but that's normal for this time frame, not all details will be released. This is what a normal information exchange is supposed to look like.
Vegas, Florida, and others have these seemingly normal questions shrouded in secrecy, which only further engages the conspiracy theoriest (left or right).
Also, counter to your point, the fact that the MSM isn't really pushing this story is also somewhat telling. Granted the article here is from CNN, but I haven't heard a peep about it on TV.

Disclaimer: I'm not alt right, whatever that means, and don't necessarily believe those other incidents are false flags/crisis actor type situations. I do believe weird shit happened in connection to those other incidents however, which deserve further inquiry.

The people weren't "pushing an agenda" that Florida was a false flag. They were pointing out the dozens of things that pointed to the shooting being a false flag, from the many chances authorities had to stop the shooter long before he started shooting, to the armed deputies waiting outside while the shooting went on, to the kids hiding from the shooter in the closet doing anti-gun interviews, to the ready-made media campaign and expensive and highly organized anti-gun protest movement that instantly arose after the shooting, to the key spoke-student's ties to the media and FBI. And more. Just because Florida shooting was a false flag doesn't mean that every other shooting will be.

Immediately after a shooting, certain people consider a couple variables, decide it's a false flag, then work backwards from there. In the case of the MD shooting, the good guy with a gun narrative is more valuable than the false flag narrative, so that's what they go with.

If you ask me, anyone still trying to use the “alt-right” label is simply demonstrating just how radically far-left and agenda driven they and themselves actually are.

We can also call these people: “people with opinions”

While the school shooting obviously happened it is also very obvious who was pushing the agenda. A group of 15 year old kids are not organised enough to arrange a national walkout. Elementary school children are not organised enough to arrante a walk out.

Do you know who are? The adults behind the children. The few kids who decided to refrain from the walk out were often threatened with punishment (Google this). So whose agenda are we really following? Grade 3's or adults?

Yea, nice dodge on the Elementary students. A few years ago I was in high school, so yes that is what I am saying. If anything the vast majority would have dodged any sort of protest and gone home to smoke weed, play games, go to a restaurant with friends, etc.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/kidspost/thousands-of-students-walk-out-of-school-in-protest-of-gun-violence/2018/03/14/2cfff8ec-232c-11e8-94da-ebf9d112159c_story.html?utm_term=.3297f69f332a

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/3/14/17119554/national-school-walkout-gun-violence-tweets

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/03/14/national-school-walkout-students-to-protest-gun-violence-call-for-action-one-month-after-parkland-shooting.html

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/03/14/593433911/across-the-country-students-walk-out-to-protest-gun-violence

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/students-walkout-parkland-victims-1.4574917

I'm not even American and we don't have the same issues in my country but the fact that you can't tell this was orchestrated by adults instead of children is outstanding.

Because then it stops being something minors are fighting for and something politically motivated adults are supporting. Which is the underlying point. Its essentially dirty politics.

True fact. Teenage brains don’t fully develop until the age of 25 or so. Therefore, children literally do not have the cognitive development to construct critical thinking skills. It is for this reason there is simply no way they orchestrated this themselves. It was put into process of their reasoning from somewhere.

Where is the hypocrisy? In one case, police were ordered to standown to maximize the body count and the other the police did their job.

Right. Let's pretend that you don't know exactly what I am talking about despite it being reported extensively in the MSM.

Why else would they be ordered to not enter and stop the shooting? It is the quintessential police duty. Let no crisis go to waste, even if you have to manufacture it, right?

The FBI and police repeatedly ignored tips about the shooter and the police were ordered to stand down. Case closed.

This doesn't suggest that they wanted to maximize body count. They could have been investigating, but not quick engough.

They were ordered to remain outside. Occam's razor:The simplest answer is usually the correct one.

...then blame the victims for being crisis actors.

I never said anything about crisis actors. I have no problem believing that they'd murder innocents by the hundred to advance their agenda.

Maybe you just don't pay attention enough and it makes you feel better to assume so much when you have so little information and facts to go on.

The FBI repeatedly ignored tips about the shooter. The local police were ordered not to interfere with the shooting. That is more than enough evidence.

It’s also come out that Cruz was supposed to have been institutionalized nearly 2 years prior, but they didn’t do it.

Too many cards fell into place for this guy to succeed.

I am waiting for the court documents to reveal the FBI's confidential informant.

What does the alt-right have to do with this?

How does the alt right push this narrative? What platform do they use?

I am seriously curious, please do not take offense. Who is in the alt right?

I have no political affiliation but I think the doubts and questions begin when there coincidentally happens to be a drill or training excercise with the same game plan at the exact same time as the "real event.'

Yes, I missed the point. Need sleep. Carry on and pretend I was never here .

From my understanding as well, you are correct. It’s not complete apples to apples and it was probably misleading for me to phrase it that way. There were certainly unique in there own way.

Im mostly just trying to make a point that the difference in the guns used, played a factor. I don’t think you can compare the two shooting to determine the difference between having unarmed vs armed teachers