In the 16 years, the far right and the homegrown fascists have committed more terror attacks in the United States than any other group - by far.

And it has been increasing in recent years.

The conspiracy we need to be looking at is why the current administration is cutting funding for combating these groups purely for political gain.

Big claim, no sources. Got any proof that:

"In the 16 years, the far right and the homegrown fascists have committed more terror attacks in the United States than any other group - by far."?

And: "And it has been increasing in recent years."

Big claim, no sources. Got any proof that:

"In the 16 years, the far right and the homegrown fascists have committed more terror attacks in the United States than any other group - by far."?

And: "And it has been increasing in recent years."

Since then — from Sept. 12, 2001, to Dec. 31, 2016  — there have been 85 attacks in the country by violent extremists resulting in 225 deaths. GAO reported citing data from the U.S. Extremist Crime Database.

Of those 225 deaths:

• 106 individuals were killed by far-right violent extremists in 62 separate incidents;

• 119 individuals were killed by radical Islamist violent extremists in 23 separate incidents;

• The number of people killed in a given year ranged from one to 49.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/aug/16/look-data-domestic-terrorism-and-whos-behind-it/

And:

White supremacists in the United States killed more than twice as many people in 2017 as they did the year before, and were responsible for far more murders than domestic Islamic extremists, helping make 2017 the fifth deadliest year on record for extremist violence in America, a new report states.

http://huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5a5f59b0e4b0ee2ff32c4bea/amp

OK so not to sound like a know-it-all but right wing violence is no where near as much of a problem (If even a problem at all) as mainstream left wing domestic terror groups and riots. Be honest though, the issue of most mass violence comes form Islam and it needs to be stamped out, denied or reformed.

I worked downtown Manhattan during Occupy Wall Street,and my building was targeted. The police kept the entrance clear, and even though I worked on the 32nd floor I wore headphones to down of the chanting.

The only other inconvenience was that zuccotti Park and union Square were filled.. BFD.

I'll take that over charlottesville any day of the week.

And I showed that right wing terrorism dwarfs Islamic terrorism since 2001. What makes you think left wing terrorism is worse?

Do you truly believe right wing violence is more of a problem than mainstream left wing violence and Islam? Do you HONESTLY believe that Islam kills less people per year than people who believe in a smaller government do? That is seriously worrying.

I showed statistics which are properly cited. Why don't you?

Make a post about it then.

Sounds like the kind of mouth breathing cnn watcher that unironically believes the government version of things like Waco and ruby ridge

Nope. I have deep reservations about both, and I'm a Clinton fan.

You're definitely not that into conspiracy theories if you support the Clinton family.

So they should be a Trump supporter?

Or a neither supporter. Good call neither.

Neither sounds better than boldly assuming someone is out for your best interest simply because you like their personality or policies.

I'm a born and bred New Yorker who believes Clinton's policies did more good for my city than Giuliani ever did with his authoritarian crackdown on civil liberties, and Hillary did more as senator than Trump ever did with his mafia toys, stiffing local workers and racist renting policies.

Completely missed my point but good luck with rabbit hole you've started to fall down. One day at your tin-foil hat wearing peak you'll understand what I meant by a hardened conspiracy theorists would never support the Clinton family. Your ignorance isn't your fault though, I feel as if you've been fed so much disinformation and forced to watch this facade for so long you still haven't disconnected from the game reality the elites stage for you. The fact that you're on this sub is a good start but please refrain from posting anything purely politically motivated that is wrong then argue FOR an elite who has done you more harm than good. Disconnect your political ideals from your critical thinking.

Keep on gatekeeping.

You can't be a conspiracy theorist if you support Trump. He's a corrupt, bullying piece of shit, and there's a reason his hometown has despised him for years, both rich and poor alike.

Again all accusations no truth or evidence or anything to do with the matter at hand. Keep it up, the left.

Sure, if you bury your head in the sand and forget his the lawsuit he settled for marking prospective black tenants with (C) next to their name, or calling for the Central Park 5 to be put to death after they were exonerated, or saying a judge was biased against him because he was Mexican (ignoring that he was American). Oh! And he started, "Laziness is a trait in blacks”

... But yeah, he's not a racist.

You mean the same Trump who has done more for the black community in his term already than Obama did in 8 years (that's a measurable fact that cannot be argued please do not embarrass yourself you'll only look like you don't know what you're talking about, so many have tried). It has literally never been confirmed that he said that ever and he had as much faith in the justice system as every other person who knows how corrupt the world is does. If you're going to argue he is racist cite something that is factual and actually to do with race. Saying he supported punishing those people just because they were black and not because he has little faith that the system will produce the correct verdict doesn't make him a bad person, it makes you a bad person for jumping to such conclusions about someone you don't even know. As the left would say, don't be prejudice. It's like saying Trump is racist for the Muslim ban, pure emotional response with no logical thinking in play.

By the way, my step-dad also supported punishing central park 5 due to his faith in the court's competency to produce an accurate verdict. Would you call him racist too? Or do I need to baselessly accuse him of saying something racist first?

What the fuck are you on about?

He continued to call the Central Park 5 guilty after DNA evidence exonerated them.

In a Playboy interview in 97, he said it was probably true that he said laziness was a trait common to blacks.

And Trump's comments on Judge Curiel were called racist even by Paul Ryan.

Believe it or not but there are alot of people who don't believe in the final verdict, a cover-up, incompetency whatever it just doesn't sit well with alot of people. Are you forgetting which sub you are on? Trump also never said that specific quote was true just that "the stuff she wrote was probably true" bearing in mind he probably never read the book and doesn't know every single thing she said which is testimony to the fact he later realised what O'Donnell had been saying and went back on it after realising it wasn't true. If someone wrote a hit piece on me and I was in Trump's position I probably would have said the same thing especially if I hadn't have read it word for word, because it's fun, it stirs the pot and what is anyone gonna do about it. It's Trump afterall, he's an egotistical person. I'm still waiting for you to show me something that could make me believe he genuinely believes white people are genetically superior. What has he done to non-white people do disadvantage them since he's been in the 2nd most powerful position Earth? When has he 100% confirmed said or did anything racist? The only people who claim he is racist are the misinformed or those too stupid to actually look up what he has done for non-white people.

You're clearly quite ignorant. CP5 were convicted and spent years in prison despite their DNA not matching what was found. In 2002 a different man who is a convicted murder confessed, whose DNA was at the scene, and knew details that weren't released to the public. The CP5 verdict was vacated. And Trump still called them guilty after all this.

NYC has since paid them $41MM.

And what about Judge Curiel? Try said some he was Mexican he couldn't rule fairly... Of course, he's not actually Mexican, but try still impugned his impartiality since Trump wanted to build a wall.

You mean the same Trump who has done more for the black community in his term already than Obama did in 8 years (that's a measurable fact that cannot be argued please do not embarrass yourself you'll only look like you don't know what you're talking about, so many have tried).

It was a continuation of a trend that had been going on since 2010, not to mention the fact that no president has that kind of immediate effect on jobless rates.

...And Trump has helped that figure grow considerably more than Obama did in the same amount of time. Under Trump, black employment has been going basically straight up. When Obama was running the shop it went up and down far too many times than acceptable.

Under Obama african-american unemployment rates went up from 2008 - 2010 during the biggest recession in 30 years. After that it went down continuously for 6 years until they reached their lowest rates since the stat was measured in Jan 2017. They continued downward after that despite trump's presence in the white house, not because of it.

With the policies enacted by Trump that has helped the significant growth of the US economy and with everything he has done for the black community (again, measurably more than Obama has done) you could quite easily make the connection that growth (thanks to Trump) = more jobs = lower unemployment rates.

Wether you like him or not you cannot argue he has done very well at restoring the US economy, as expected, I mean he is a billionaire.

He didn't do shit. The economy didn't need "restoring". It was humming along very well for the last six years. All he had to do was not fuck it up.

Um, no, Trump has not done any restoring of the US economy. He inherited a booming economy from Obama. It seems unlikely that Trump can ever match Obama's job-creation rate.

I particularly like the part where you still think "if not Hillary, trump." Neither is a more common attitude in my experience

The person I was responding to is a Trump supporter from their previous comments.

https://www.reddit.com/r/insanepeoplefacebook/comments/86agjc/z/dw3wan1

I'm a Trump supporter...

While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Jokes on you he's here to help you workout

Dude.... This guy outright believes Islam is less harmful than the right wing. I'm seriously starting to think this guy is training.

you do realize that both radical islam and the US right are both co srvative movements, right? And that both groups do not have anyones best interests and agendas at heart but their own?

I'm sorry but how is a religious government in anyway whatsoever conservative? That's the complete opposite of conservative. If anything Islam can be more related to the progressive movement, breaking down people into their identity groups and establishing an actually real oppressive system based on group identity alone that ignores individual identities. There's a reason they actively hunt and kill Christian people in a lot of majority Muslim countries further East. In the future please think about the definitions you use as it can paint a false image in people's minds about certain perspectives and view points that you don't seem to share or understand fully. For example, the KKK could be labelled as right wing but their version is a very minor fringe element of society that generally isn't accepted nor is it considered modern conservatism as we don't define groups of people by outliers, if at all. Again, those people who say "only white can be racist" are a fringe element (although very more prevalent today) of modern day leftism.

What?

What do you personally think is responsible for it then? I can't say I personally agree with you on the possibility it's just natural but maybe you can clarify for me?

Design meaning intent of creation by someone or something right? So what do you think designed our reality? Is it a religious point of view I.e. God, Allah or something more plausible but still very out there? Because the only thing that stops me from seeing your point of view is the possibility of it being an argument from authority, an authority I may not believe like you do.

See now I can understand your point better thanks. I normally dismiss anything that argues from a holy book because the amount of times people have tried to argue about something and say that their holy book is a source or a standard is staggering. An undefined omnipotent force is something I can get behind but if you said it was God from the Bible it would be harder to stand with you. Thanks for clarifying. I've never taken into account that these things that always seem to be connected in some way through numbers could be something weaved into the fibre of reality itself. I would have said, if anything on the subject, that it was the people orchestrating it having some fun or maybe it's relevant to them who knows, but the natural way of the world kind of theory sounds intriguing. If there is a way of gathering more evidence of this and you have the time or resources to do it please post in future. I'll sure be looking into this now.

While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

The Norse Norns or the Greek Fates.

Lol, if you were meant to be posting here youd clearly not be bringing up the current "divide and conquer" rhetoric that is the alt right. Homegrown fascists. What is this 1920's Italy?

Is there even such a thing as a homegrown grass roots movement anymore? Everything is funded by someone.

I do have to give you credit though. You managed to hide what everyone says about the Trump administration in a lot more words than they usually use. But once again, divide and conquer.

The power we all have lies in the middle. Remember that, and maybe we can all collectively tap in to it.

They just use it for evil. They know the pattern, the code, the structure and are using it.

Time to wise up and fight back. The more GOOD things/event/etc we can do on these days, it will shift the balance.

Even if there's no deeper reason, it serves as a cheerleading dogwhistle for other Satanists - basically, "We are in control."

Hmm any point in arranging "good" events on "777" days?

Arrange good events on every day. Give them literal fucking hell (their perspective) for a while while we have some god damn fun for once.

Obviously then balance it out a bit, else you become as bad, but a good bout of sucker punches would be nice to dole out, they won't know what fucking hit them.

What is they? Like is they, the deep state or is there a more specific evil?

Honestly, it doesn't matter.. They is they and they are not me. Its up to you if that applies or not to your self.

Been a few years now. I still check in on you often Chris. I really hope you get help I fear you're losing your grip on reality. I know this probably won't change your mind but if there's even a flicker in there that something is off and you want to talk feel free to message me.

What happened to humans being inherently good? I'm human, I know that worries you. I just want to help. I'll be around if you change your mind.

Rule 10

I didn't think this would break rule 10. I'm not saying he's a troll or a shill. I just believe he needs help. I think his idea are wrong not him. I think attacking ideas is OK or else what's the point of this sub

Well, that user didn't appreciate your demeaning tone. Message the mod team and they might reverse my ruling.

He read my message that's enough for me

Hey grace honest question, are you a new mod? I've seen your name around past years but never noticed the green shield?

If so congrats man.

Hey there! Yeah, fuckaduck, MissType, aliester, Kitt and myself were inducted last week. It was a surprise to me, too, lol.

Awesome! Was just wondering.

FTR, I think you're doing a great job.

Thank you.

TLDR this for me? What is it you are saying here?

What makes it false? Just because it operates in a certain way it is false?

Look at this reality, the deception contained within, and ask yourself what are the damn odds this is the only one?

Zero, but why does that make this one false?

Are you coming on to me?

I am no tick tocker. Or if I am then I know what is tick tocking me.

No, that's just what gives it away.

Why do you make the conclusion this is false from that?

Because this reality does everything it can to present itself as singular-- and the odds of such events and timings happening naturally are beyond-impossible. My Occam's Razor says no.

What you experience here is one particular way of experiencing a particular thing through the particular set of the senses you have within this manifestation in the human form. Reality does not say anything, it doesnt sell you a story of itself. It does not say what you see is all there is to it. The idea that this visible reality is all there is was introduced to you by society and other people, not by reality itself. When you go to sleep at night various different realities manifest for you.

What you call a natural happening is a concept you have about what constitutes natural. How do you know that what is actually the nature of existence is not something else than what you consider as natural through your limited perception? Also if you conclude this reality is not natural then your very concept of natural is within the unnatural and as such is already wrong.

I'm not hearing a 'no'...

I dont know what you mean by coming onto you.

Really good argument you just made there

I didnt want a tldr, I am a different guy than that one. What do you think about my points? I think they are worth thinking about for you. Since to me it appears that your idea of false is a mere assumption based on the notion that you know what is real.

I think you're suggesting that I should doubt my own experiences and perceptions. Sounds like a one-way ticket to nihilism to me.

I am asking how you draw the conclusions that you have from what you have told me.

You already question the very nature of this existence. That is doubt. You dont know what this is. But if we dont question we dont find. If we make up conclusions before really finding we are quite possibly wrong.

Lets imagine that in the normal state that we are brought up by society we are in a kind of a dream or illusion, which by the way is one common thread in all spiritual traditions that aim at the realisation of the nature of reality, that before waking up you are in a kind of a distortion, a dream.

If this is so, then if you do not investigate and doubt your current experience there is no possibility of waking up.

The Matrix?

Every pushed narrative is opposite and has a twist.. The matrix: Pick both pills, find balance.

The red pill represents: The elite believe themselves to be neo. "we" plebs are the enemy, coming to defeat and take over. While they hold up in the last human city, zion.

Fits the greater state of Israel agenda, fits why they want control, they saw the potential to be god, unlimited potential to do anything in this reality, and let greed and desire (ego) take over.. They want to stop the second coming of Christ/consciousness, in order to have total control over all within the system. They don't want you to fulfill your potential. They want you to work for them so they don't have to. So they can live forever through a singular family legacy for generations to come.. The last human bloodline.

They make a film, so you sit and watch it, wasting your precious time so you die without realising your potential.

Open your minds a little.

To me, the implication is that terrorist events are not random and are all coordinated by the same entity. This entity uses a specific timeline for these events for a reason unknown, could be tradition only.

... and what is that?

And you wonder why you aren't taken seriously. Put the pipe down.

The snake eating its own tail. Its riddled throughout history, this is nothing new. If you want it in simple terms it is a closed loop with a fixed foundation source pattern and source code.

The snake eating its own tail. Its riddled throughout history, this is nothing new. If you want it in simple terms it is a closed loop with a fixed foundation source pattern and source code.

Our Rob or Rus.

Christ, they must have been thicker than a ticket touts wad.

Our Rob or Ross, actually.

Oh shit now it all makes sense. I thought you said finite hydra.

perhaps this "entity" is the same thing that the christians call the devil, and maybe it operates like a hive mind collecting human energy from these conflicts.

So your saying it could be the dark side

Maybe, I think it's more likely a couple crazy families with all the power. Maybe they THINK they are the devil? or doing his bidding or something? Or maybe they just love power and find that the best way to keep control is to keep people scared through carefully crafted and scheduled "events".

The authors of false flag attacks wouldn't restrict themselves to auspicious days, it's far too limiting. They'll be carried out wherever, whenever and however they see that it is maximally expedient to do so.

It has to do with magic in plainsight. Increases the potency of their spells.

These are the types of posts we need more of, a lot of effort mixed with a good amount of crazy.

Edit: There's 21 words in my original post, 21/3=7 days in a week, of which Wednesday is the third weekday. Coincidence or is something bigger going on here?

From a book called: The crystal language : https://i.imgur.com/3XVzHJk.png

Sent you a pm with the book, enjoy :)

Could you pm me the book as well.

One thing I’m truly fascinated in is old religious scriptures as well as tribal mythology and looking at them through a mondernntechnological lense. This guy mentions on the page you linked that “Star” refers to nuclear power plant. Well, that makes sense as stars are basically nuclear reactors and changes the entire meaning of the scripture.

For instance, Native American culture mentioning flaming dragons from the sky seems like an interpratation of a space ship but nothing to relate it to.

http://www.dailycrow.com is probably right up your street

Can I get a PM too?

I'd like to check out the book too, thanks!

book

PM me the book as well.

puedo tener el libro?

This is some hilarious cherrypicking of events: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents#1970%E2%80%93present

It's not statistically significant to align these events with numerology when there are so many.

Check this out, would love to know what you make of it:

http://www.973-eht-namuh-973.com/index.html

First time I saw Eht Namuh it reminded me of Timecube. It seems a bit crazy on the surface, but I'd say it is more abstract than crazy. Probe a bit deeper into the site and you will see it is full of universal harmonics and wisdom across the ages, connecting the dots on so many things. Lots of "reduce to deduce" type mathematics that remind me of gematria. And its message is benevolent, unlike some of Timecube.

Whether it is a work of art by someone who lost their mind, a magnum opus (the pages describe this in several ways; philosopher's stone / jewel in the lotus / om mani padme hum), or a key to the universe, it is of a highly intelligent mind, and I doubt the original author David Denison is still maintaining it.

Here some users discuss magnum opus on the Eht Namuh forum:

http://www.973-eht-namuh-973.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=11913

Some of the more creative theories suggest Eht Namuh is a message from higher dimensional beings, or artificial intelligence. I haven't been able to draw a conclusion yet. It doesn't feel like an ARG or elaborate troll.

There are some weird discussions on the Eht Namuh forums. One guy in particular posts cryptic diagrams that seem to have some meaning. I went through his post history and its 40+ pages of these diagrams. I don't really understand why.

http://www.973-eht-namuh-973.com/forum/search.php?author_id=10952&sr=posts

That tengri person you linked is interesting. I found many more accounts like that and even stranger ones through my Eht Namuh research. Check out /r/libraryofbabel and what the user accounts post there. Check out /r/textualstatic. I don't know if this is high autism at work, or if there's something more to this, but it's a rabbit hole so be prepared.

Some people understand the universe is all numbers, others don't. I think you should change the likelihood of the dates with 3 6's in them to high. 616 is also considered an alternative of this number, which matches your dates well too.

Here is Wisdom, Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_the_Beast

This honestly might be the most ridiculous thread I've seen on this sub

Thank you for pointing that out. I'm pretty high and I was really starting to think, holy shit there's something to this.

You,ve grounded me without sobering me and for that I thank you

Maybe you should cut back on the drugs if this obvious bullshit looks plausible to you. Get back in touch with reality.

Methinks you've never smoked

That's what I was wondering. Are these the only terrorist attacks or are they only picked cause they match up with the supposed pattern? As we can see, these are only showcased cause they match the supposed pattern.

When you look for stuff like this and disregard the stuff that doesn't fit what you want, of course things looks suspicious and spooky.

So why isn’t the Stoneman Douglas shooting listed as a terrorist event?

I don't know. Have you read the discussion page for this page on Wikipedia? That's where you start. If you don't find the answer on that page then you should ask them.

So why did you downvote me? I wasn’t arguing with you. It’s hard to ask Wikipedia these things. I did read their criteria. I was just bringing up a trelevant question. It’s alright pal.

"It's mere coincidence, my boy..." waves hand

How is this the top comment on a /r/conspiracy thread? Especially one that's 75% upvoted. Certainly there couldn't be any fuckery going on here with the upvotes. Especially not from someone literally named "throw trash" with "otheraccountttt" jumping in with the gaslighting. I don't come to this sub very often and this reminds me why.

Maybe you should go through my history and see that I'm on your side before getting paranoid. :|

A lot of events seem to happen around full and new moons.

Look at what forces act upon the moon, other planets, it gets interesting.

Go on, pretty please?

Indrid Cold

OP, anything on the repetition of the number 7 in general, and in relation to the month June and the 9/11 event respectively?

Does the pointing out of the phenomena have the potential of cancelling the phenomena? Can the phenomena itself be a marker, an anniversary of sorts, of some kind of universalized trauma?

It may be that there are certain things that are objectively wrong in the world, precisely and fundamentally in (and not despite) their impact as psychic events, the marker of their objective wrongness would then be their subsequent manifestation as spontaneously occurring material/empirical phenomena in unfolding time.

7 circles in the flower of life. That's the basis.

Yup :) best advice I can give is draw it. Get a pen and squared paper (or photoshop/illustrator) and start drawing it, play with shapes. You'll start to see everything, and I mean everything.

I suspect "string theory" may hold the key.

Plank theory? The dot is an infinite fractal torus. The line is a curve/ark connection between end nodes/tori. Together make the flower and the code (binary trinary flow)

I think, been a little while since I drew it all out

I have, was a while back.. I'll watch again though! Look through da Vinci's drawings, see how many patterns you see when you understand :)

I linked in the other comment branch :) mega.nz link

Remember his tweets with the dates being 7's? I tried finding it last weeks and couldn't, I hope you know what I'm talking about

Thing is looong, where's the part with the 7's! IIRC it was on 7/7/17 at 7:17 or someshit. Could been another number but I swear it was 7's.

RemindMe! 70 days

RemindMe! 70 days "Disaster"

ITT: Somehow numerology incited arguments about Trump versus Hillary.

im confused

just different MO than AQ et al exactly because of the surveillance state

Ah, been a while since something posted a real schizophrenic conspiracy in here. With all the non-conspiracy political talk it is almost refreshing to see someone connect dots to believe that all terrorist acts are perpetrated by an unknown shadow entity.

What’s the pattern...?

Perhaps it has to do with this: "This minus or gap is not simply nothing, it is a minus that materially affects the structure with which it appears. It is a non-being with serious consequences.

"In this sense, the fact that there is the unconscious — together with the fact that the unconscious is not simply subjective but has an objective dimension to it, related to the structure of speech/language — tells us something about this structure itself. The very existence of subjective distortions tells us something “objective” about the structure involved in them. It tells us that this objective structure is ridden by a minus, asymmetry, contradiction. It is not simply neutral or indifferent. This is also an important epistemological point. There is an objective side to subjective distortions."

"The emergence of the signifying order directly coincides with the non-emergence of one signifier, and this fact — this original minus-one — leaves its trace in a particular disturbance of the signifying system..."

https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/too-much-of-not-enough-an-interview-with-alenka-zupancic/#!

RemindMe! 6 Jun 2018

RemindMe! June 7th, 2018 "Did something major happened yesterday?"

FBI is on a six week cycle.

The events we see on tv are all about special dates and human sacrifice.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFBKmJrU5lo

They use Gematria. They like numerology.

Right now is the Season of Sacrifice. Wasn't there a big theatre fire in Russia? Yup. Check the dates and times of cabal owned media. They'll report 33 or other predictable numbers that mean something to them (therefore WE NEED to understand the system to expose them).

Something about this psychoanalytic article makes me think it might possibly be of interest to OP: https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/too-much-of-not-enough-an-interview-with-alenka-zupancic/#!

You know it’s shady when the number 666 is brought up. The oldest and more reliable Biblical manuscripts have the number as 669. 666 and it’s “connections” is some imaginary fairy tale.

In the Netherlands the emergency number was changed from 0611 to 112 due to cell phones taking over the 06- numbers.

Interesting theory OP.

I’m of the opinion that most, if not all, “terror” events in the mainstream media are fiction. Nobody gets hurt, let alone gets killed. It’s all just made for TV entertainment to keep the zombie masses enthralled.

Without wishing to get bogged down on whether or not I’m right about that (which is a waste of time), do you think the symbology still holds if these events are manufactured and stage-managed, thereby ensuring physical harm to bystanders is actually minimised?

I’d say yes, it does. If enough people believe something is real then it may as well be real. All the symbolic effects are the same without the many downsides of actual murder.

I’m of the opinion that most, if not all, “terror” events in the mainstream media are fiction. Nobody gets hurt, let alone gets killed. It’s all just made for TV entertainment to keep the zombie masses enthralled.

All the symbolic effects are the same without the many downsides of actual murder.

I lean that way too, but it's not just the symbolic effects that are the same, they have used these "attacks" to justify a very real police state, and several very real wars.

a very real police state

The majority of people voluntarily contribute most of the data each state collects, in one way or another.

several very real wars.

Once you wrap your head around the idea that events like the Boston Marathon bombing and 9/11 might well be completely fake, anything can be faked... including war.

The majority of people voluntarily contribute most of the data each state collects, in one way or another.

I don't think that's true at all. The state does much more than just read your facebook posts.

After wrapping one’s head around the idea that events like the Boston Marathon bombing and 9/11 are completely fake, it’s only a small step further to realise almost anything can be faked... including war.

I suppose, but if that's true, at what point did they start being fake? Is this a post-9/11 phenomenon?

The state does much more than just read your facebook posts.

Almost entirely with implied or explicit consent. We all tolerate these violations to stay within the perimeter of a societal sandbox constructed for the exclusive benefit of those who created it. A group that long ago entrenched themselves outside of it to guarantee the survival of their bloodlines.

at what point did they start being fake?

No idea. It’s logical to assume that recorded history which cannot be personally verified may as well be fake, and likely is fake, to whatever extent is needed to maintain the containment sandbox; in fact, this is the only logical conclusion if one honestly examines and extrapolates simpler truths.

Almost entirely with implied or explicit consent.

Again, either you have a strange definition of consent, or you are not aware of the extent of the surveillance state.

No idea. It’s logical to assume that recorded history which cannot be personally verified may as well be fake, and likely is fake, to whatever extent is needed to maintain the containment sandbox; in fact, this is the only logical conclusion if one honestly examines and extrapolates from simpler truths.

So you're not saying that something like Vietnam, or WW2 were completely fake, just that it was much different than we were told, and they are lying for whatever propaganda reasons they might have? Personally I've just been noticing the fakery post 9/11, but I suppose it's logical that it has been going on for longer than that.

Again, either you have a strange definition of consent

Nobody is forcing anyone to live inside the system. It’s just easier to do so. Much, much easier. Hence “consent”.

or you are not aware of the extent of the surveillance state.

That surveillance relies on a baseline amount of consenting participation. The state cannot be omniscient outside its own boundaries.

Is surveillance possible if the state doesn’t know you exist? If you chose to live “off the grid”, receiving no taxable income and consuming or bartering with the spoils of the land and your personal labour instead?

Admittedly I don’t live by those rules myself, I’m on reddit for starters... but it’s theoretically possible.

The only reason two and two makes four is because we collectively believe it does.

I get the point, but arithmetic is an objectively provable construct. The semantics don’t make any difference to the outcome. Subjective examples of collective beliefs are language, culture and so on.

Feel free to convince me otherwise though!

Understanding subjective vs objective truth leads one to a certain conclusion: that observed reality is the product of a relatively small amount of objective truths surrounded by layer upon layer of subjective lies, misdirection, deception and voluntary capitulation.

We each project a synthetic version of reality, most of which the zombie herd gobbles up directly from the media trough. Then confirmation biases and feedback loops reinforce those projections as “truth” in our minds.

Amen!

Why does it say: Date 3/22, then list 9/11?

pure speed freak gibberish

Nope. I have deep reservations about both, and I'm a Clinton fan.

Keep on gatekeeping.

You can't be a conspiracy theorist if you support Trump. He's a corrupt, bullying piece of shit, and there's a reason his hometown has despised him for years, both rich and poor alike.

Could you pm me the book as well.

One thing I’m truly fascinated in is old religious scriptures as well as tribal mythology and looking at them through a mondernntechnological lense. This guy mentions on the page you linked that “Star” refers to nuclear power plant. Well, that makes sense as stars are basically nuclear reactors and changes the entire meaning of the scripture.

For instance, Native American culture mentioning flaming dragons from the sky seems like an interpratation of a space ship but nothing to relate it to.

Can I get a PM too?

It may be that there are certain things that are objectively wrong in the world, precisely and fundamentally in (and not despite) their impact as psychic events, the marker of their objective wrongness would then be their subsequent manifestation as spontaneously occurring material/empirical phenomena in unfolding time.

I'd like to check out the book too, thanks!

book

PM me the book as well.

puedo tener el libro?