Qanon proven 100% real

0  2018-04-08 by Johnny_Oldschool

Very simple. Someone on 8chan requested that the president use the phrase "tip top" in a speech as a shoutout to the research board. Then, the president gives his Easter SOTU and says "Tip top, tippy top". After, Q posts saying "It was requested".

Case closed. Q real.

145 comments

You're right, I'm sure Hillary, Soros, Obama, etc, will be indicted any day now!

You haven't read through the drops. You should.

I've been well aware of Q since his inception. I had a shred of hope at first that he might be legit, but I got turned off by all his vague predictions that never came to fruition. Honestly, Q might actually be somebody close to Trump, but I think he's there to inspire false hope into his supporters. To give the illusion that something is being done to the corrupt individuals in our government.

Except for Saudi Arabia, Snowden, Rosenstein, Sessions, two different news narratives, Parkland, I mean come on man. You obviously haven't been following the drops at all.

I haven't followed any Q drops in about a year, what exactly has he posted so far that makes you think he's legit? I'd appreciate some links if you've got them.

He doesn't.

Seems like it.

I mean, thats how it goes round here anymore.

He only started posting at the end of October.

Yeah, I think I got Q mixed up with another poster who went by FBIAnon a while ago.

Ah. Makes sense.

I haven't seen anyone big arrested or convicted, so please forgive me if the drops don't get me excited any more.

Saudi Arabia.

why was trump doing illuminati shit with them all touching an orb

Cause the Simpsons writers scripted it, duh.

doh!

For me, the biggest confirmation was North Korea. I think the timeline for this operation is just a little longer than most people have the patience for. I suspect it will play out into the summer and will have reached a dramatic resolution before the fall.

I suspect you're right. And really, the mere fact that they're even entertaining the notion of denuclearizing is absolutely fucking huge.

What is your explanation to the “drops” that said both podesta bros, huma, hillary, were all in custody a year and a half ago?

They didn't.

Lol looks like I gave you too much credit, I thought you would say Q was trying to divert attention or something. because those drops did happen, sorry... They literally said the podesta bros are “on the run” and Hillary and huma were “in custody”

I know this because I was really into it at the time.... until that bs dropped

Haven't heard from Tony in awhile have we. And it never said Hillary and Huma are in custody. Perhaps one of them may have been held for questioning though. Read through the drops.

If “Q said so” is going to be your schtick, then at least be able to link the related Q drops.

The fuck are you even on about.

never play dumb. link some q drops or as a lurker I see that you are surrendering.

I'll do you one better. I'll link every single one of them to date.

https://qanonposts.com/

I thought you would say Q was trying to divert attention or something

Nice. You should be Q!

Hrc had an ankle cast for too long. Now she has a wrist cast. It would be consistent with electronic custody.

I really dislike this use of the word “drop”. It sounds like an upper class white kid trying to sound ghetto gangsta. What’s wrong with “statements”? Too establishment?

It's referring to dropping intelligence. I suppose "releases" could work just as well.

I get the intent. Still dislike its use in this context. Many other words that would be more appropriate, just as the one you just used. I guess it’s too late to try to get people to change it now.

Monday, it is always Monday.

I predict he will say terrific and fantastic in his next speech. -RussianbotAnon

It wasn't a prediction, it was a specific request. Surely you know the difference.

But it was a request made on a public forum that literally anyone could read, including people in the white house. Surely you can understand how this proves nothing.

Uh, yeah, obviously it was made on a public forum. Specifically to request a shoutout to the Qresearch board. And said shoutout was delivered. Proving either the president reads the board, or someone close to him reads the board.

Proving either the president reads the board, or someone close to him reads the board.

But it doesn't make q real...

So your theory is that the President's staff browses 8chan for things to put in their speeches, completely separate from Q.

They don't browse it specifically to find things to put in speeches, but they could have seen it and thought it would be funny to troll them.

Now that's a fantastic conspiracy theory right there.

And far more likely than the white house using a shit tier image board to drop intel. You got trolled by the resident of the usa, bruh. no shame in that.

Where else would they drop it? Name me a site.

Nowhere. They don't drop intel to random people on the internet. The internet is for disinfo, which is what q is.

You can't prove a negative. Got anything else?

Oh man forget trying to reason with these people. No matter how valid a point you make you get down voted to shit. Just laugh to yourself at the bots and shills on here who think they can effect the outcome by down voting you. Those of us with eyes and ears see and hear you and appreciate that you're not intimidated by their garbage. Power to you man!

Thanks dude! I do my best. Generally I don't waste my time here any more. I was just bored this afternoon.

Yep, what a great attitude you have, just blame anyone or anything with a contradictory opinion as a shill or bot.

"hah its more likely Trump completed the request given to Q because he coincidentally saw it on the Q forum even though Q is fake and the President spends his time following LARPs"

No, they browse T_D and they are well aware of Qanon.

Hell he even did an AMA over there so... that just goes to show you how much they do browse it.

Q did a AMA there? If that's true, I'd have to refer back to a drop he made where he said that no communication would happen outside of the 8chan platform, and that anything which did was fraudulent.

Or are you referring to Trump doing an AMA over there? If that's the case, then sure, I could believe that. Obama did an AMA here years ago. It was bullshit and I can only assume a Trump AMA would be the very same level of bullshit.

yes, Trump did an AMA over there, so you can be sure his people monitor that site closely.

'Requesting' trump says tip-top would be a fairly easy bet, he's used the phrase before- he has a very limited vocabulary of superlative adjectives.

Or Trump is a huge troll.

That's not what happened.

https://imgur.com/gallery/yaz8f

As you can see, the anon asked Q to tell Trump to say tippy top in January. Trump ended up using the phrase 3 months later. This is hardly a coincidence, considering this is a phrase he's used several times in the past. Here he is saying tippy tippy top in 2016.

https://youtu.be/fEDW83e5-NM

Lawls, just staight copied and pasted that from your damage control files eh. He doesn't say "tip top" in that video, does he. He does however say it after it was requested, bot the requested "tip top" followed by his "tippy top". And it wasn't 3 months. It was two.

I guess you didnt watch the video. Half through through he says tippy tippy top a couple times and then says he loves saying that.

You didn't read my comment properly.

I read it. Trump used one of his common phrases 2 months after some anon requested it and that's mind blowing to you? Any person could do what Q does. Anybody. All he does is ask questions relevant to the news and make predictions that dont come true. Where's the Hillary tape dude? Q said Obama lawyered up like a month ago. What happened to that? When is the terrorist picture of Obama with an ak-47 coming out? I'll bet you a thousand dollars that non of those things happen ever. I can hit you up in 3 months if you want.

Read through the actual drops.

I've been following this for months dude. I read through the drops. He heavily implied that a Hillary tape was about to drop. He said Obama lawyered up. Now he's saying the internet is gonna blow up when a terrorist image of Obama surfaces. This stuff is complete bullshit that never came true. At what point will his failed predictions make you wonder if hes not who he says he is? How long? Will you be waiting a year for this Hillary tape and Obama picture? How long does Q have until you admit he was wrong?

Pathetic.

So I guess you wont answer any of my questions. I guess it's hard to hear that something you put so much faith in isnt true. I get it. Let me know when the Hillary tape and the Obama picture come out.

You're bad at this.

Obviously not considering you've completely shut down at this point. Wont address any of my questions. Now you're just saying I'm lame. Cool man, well I'll keep following the drops. Looking forward to the next failed prediction and we can talk again.

Come on man, same shit, different day. You try to set the rules for your own game, and if I refuse to play it, then I'm the loser. Tell you what. We can have a skype conversation about it if you want.

Oh shit you want to Skype with me? I didnt set any rules dude. What rules are you referring to? I asked you a few questions and you're deciding you wont answer them. How long a leash does Q have? If this Hillary tape and Obama picture dont come out a year from now, what does that mean for his predictions?

Send me your skype address and we can discuss it.

Alright then. I got family over right now. I'll hit you up later tonight.

please update us on how this probable trainwreck goes.

You want to know how funny this is. I've been doing what little I can to tip the balance by giving you upvotes and giving some of these guys down votes. On one of your comments scored -1 it literally wouldn't let me upvote it. It kept highlighting both upvote and downvote and no matter how much I clicked upvote it wouldn't change the points. On one of my clicks i accidentally hit downvote and it went right away. At least it let me remove the downvote. This is shill city buddy.

Yeah it's pretty obvious these days isn't it.

you took a massive L in this thread

Explain how without using the letter E

Are you kidding? You realize Cambridge Analytica tracks nearly everything we say online and then helps the President form his message based on what people say. Catchy slogans like Lock Her Up and Drain The Swamp we’re literally invented by random people online and then adopted by the President. Just because he says something and tips his cap to Q Anon or whatever, doesn’t mean Trump is a good President. Hundreds of Billions of dollars being funneled into the American war machine to fight Israel’s enemies while simultaneously bankrupting us is not the actions of an America First President. Allowing a private federal reserve to continue manipulating markets and continue quantitative easing policies without investigation is not something an American First President would do. There are so many things a President could do and say to prove that he’s not an establishment puppet and Trump has done nothing

I know other people on this board are stupid, but I'm not.

I know other people on this board are stupid, but I'm not.

You either know it or you don't but he minute you have to bring it up, you're the one not sure.

I 100% disagree.

I would hope so.

Debatable

Listen, I'm a master debater.

........wait...

slogans like Lock Her Up and Drain The Swamp were literally invented by random people online and then adopted by the President

True for lock her up as phrasing but drain the swamp is old and both ideas are as old as American politics.

Anyone thinking Drain the swamp was a new thing, get ready to hear it again in a few years and roll your eyes that anyone falls for that nonsense. Hope and Change, Drain the swamp, etc etc. Nothing new under the sun.

Well, I don't think it's in the government interest to acknowledge and support voices which "pretend" to be speaking for them which Q obviously does. That's a serious communication problem they wouldn't want to create. Therefore I don't consider your explanation likely.

You make assumptions about how "easy" things are for the current president without knowing the factors involved. Who are the players and how do they project their interest. What are the risks to do this and that in what order? We just don't truly know and therefore assuming Trump could just do X even if it's in his interest which we don't know either is pretty short sighted. I don't say this here to white wash what Trump does or not does but just to question the simplicity of the situation.

Here's the older red team planner post which discusses more military aspects but has a few points which should always be considered.

https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/47fl0n/is_a_nonviolent_revolution_feasible_in_the_us_or/d0cxwev/

Oh please. Everyone running for President knows damn well that comes with risks. If he were truly anti-establishment he would certainly be willing to put his body on the line for the betterment of humanity. The fact that Trump can’t even honestly say that the stock market is a bubble, the fact that he can’t even admit something as small as that proves he’s an establishment puppet. If he can’t even say that without getting killed, imagine what would happen if he actually threatened the unelected power structure in the State Department, the Pentagon, and the Federal Reserve. The guy is a total establishment puppet, and even if he isn’t, he’s still a disgrace in my eyes for not exposing the sheer corruption that exists and not putting his body on the line

When some president says that it will impact the market negatively, obviously. He'll get bad PR from the people and institutions whose paper value gets shredded with real affects at the bottom.

What's the gain outside of satisfying you?

They'll ride the economical dead horse as long as they can anyway before they aren't sure they have a working alternative. We should all pray that they find another alternative than WW3.

I have no interest in politics but the amount of pushback and similar talking point regarding Q (think low iq snarky comments) made me believe Q to be legitimate in his arena. Sometimes the shills tip their hand

Precisely.

I was thinking the same thing after reading the first few most upvoted comments. They don’t sound like conspiracy theorists to me.

I'll let you in on something. People who are into conspiracies don't have to believe in every conspiracy.

Wha??? Noooooo...

To me, a conspiracy theorist keeps an open mind. Too many people here are quick to downplay and disregard Qanon, just like they were with P(edo)izza gate once that started getting some really strong traction.

I was a fan of Q for a few weeks. It seemed like nothing came true and it was just delivering unwarranted optimism that Trump was going to drain the swamp. And I want that, but I'm not sure he will.

Read the drops. Saudi Arabia, North Korea, Parkland, Sessions, Rosenstein, two narratives, and Snowden.

Like holy shit nobody fucking reads any more.

Can you cite the relevant portions of the drops?

This Qanon continues to peak my interest aswell

Source: am reading the comments

Read the aggregate site. It's a lot more interesting than reddit comments.

https://qanonposts.com/

bad logic

In life, yes. On reddit, no.

Where's your evidence?

Suadi Arabia, snowden, parkland, sessions, rosenstein, two narratives, read through the drops.

Where is this?

Read through the drops. Here's one of the aggregate sites.

https://qanonposts.com/

R/Conspiracy: Hurrrr Q is a LARP!

Also r/conspiracy: Violently downvotes literally every single thread which discusses Q what so ever unless it's to discredit the drops.

Those 2 things make perfect sense. It’s a larp, so people downvote it for being a waste of time.

How many times has “Q” predicted some huge news, or Hillary being locked up? This nonsense has been going on for months and months

this

Q doesn't belong on conspiracy.

You haven't read the drops. As I tell everyone, read through them. All.

I’m not going to waste my time. That garbage has been going on so long and had so many “next week x will happen” and it was bullshit. Why bother? Link me to real evidence not a coincidence 3 months apart

Firstly, it hasn't. Read the drops. Secondly, It wasn't three months. You haven't read the drops.

Are you gonna link me to an archive of the drops? Is there any site that will connect the drops to events that occurred? Or will you just keep saying read the drops? Because that really doesn’t make your case any stronger

You are coming up with every possible excuse to not take in new information.

Why?

How long has the Q shit been going on? How many predictions have come and gone with nothing. It’s bullshit. Show me proof for me to reconsider it.

There comes a point where you have to determine a source isn’t worth your time.

All you are doing is being intellectually lazy because you don't want to consider another potential.

You know where to find it.

Show me the proof. Give me sources. Give me evidence.

You should specify what you are asking for. Then after doing that, consider the context.

Then, maybe.

Why dont you show us a few of the times he predicted Hillary will be locked up? That sounds like conjecture.
Lying doesnt make your side look better, and if you have to lie its an easy way to know youre wrong, friend.

Paging /u/OrangeCladAssassin , still waiting on this. To quote you, "Show me evidence."

I guess I replied to the wrong guy. I don’t waste my time archiving that shit, but the burden of proof is on the people claiming Q is real

Ahahaha. So you have no evidence of your claim? So you lied? If you have to lie to make a point, its not a very good one mate.

Do you really expect that every time some bullshit claim was made I’d try to save it? This Q shit has been going on forever so I’m not gonna waste my time digging through those archives.

Q has been going on so long that one would think there’d be so sort of proof or evidence. But nope.

Again the burden of proof is people who say Q is legit. You can believe whatever larps you want though

What specific things should we look for in the coming weeks?

An interesting observation OP. I have personally been a Q skeptic from the beginning, and while I do not believe that this proves Q is legit, I will definitely file it away in my head and keep an eye out moving forward. Very interesting and thanks for bringing it to attention.

And this isn't even the most damning thing. If people were actually reading through the drops and following the news closely you'd see that this is very clearly legitimate.

Seems like liberal conspiracy guys are having a hard time with Q movement.

Yup.

Q predicted this.

Hahahahaha

That is interesting. I think at this point Q has more or less proven that he is sone sort of insider. Hasn't proven that he isn't full of shit though.

That's one spin I've seen for it, sure. "Q is real, BUT, how do we know he's a good guy", ect ect.

I always just say to people, read through the drops. Decide for yourself.

I have read through them, and I'm inclined to agree with those who say he never actually predicts much. But on the other hand there have been too many coincidences to just dismiss it as another larp imo.

It really has nothing to do with "predictions" and everything to do with research.

Agreed. To me it's clear these people are part of the government since last November. Therefore calling this a LARP makes no sense to me whatsoever.

If people would just call it a psyop there would be a lot more common ground. That still leaves a lot room to discuss the quality of informations. Like what is true, what is disinformation and who the targets are.

Isn’t this a conspiracy board? Lol. Most of the top comments don’t sound like conspiracy theorists to me. They sound like the people that laugh when we mention anything deviating beyond the narrative in real life.

Yeah this place is bullshit now. I barely come here. Plenty of way better subs.

he was also standing next to a white rabbit...

While watching Godfather III. And reading Alice In Wonderland.

Look at all the haters. The Easter Bunny was also looking more like Alice in Wonderland Bunny.

The issue is it may mean his handlers are listening and are proving they control what trump says.

Let that sink in.

Because I don’t have the shit saved or archived because it seemed like nonsense from the get go to me.

My side? What side is that, the one that asks for proof? Please, show me proof that this 4chan bullshit is real, I’m open to evidence, but there never seems to be any. All this shit just similar to cold readings Or Nostradamus nonsense. Speak in vague riddles and people will stretch it to fit their narrative and try to make it make it make sense.

The burden of proof is on the people making the claims Q is legit.

Who are you even responding to?

He mentioned watch FB next week.

That was a week before Zuck sold $300,000,000 in shares and all he'll broke loose in FB's world

1) Request common phrase from Trump's very limited vocabulary,

2) Trump eventually says phrase months later,

3) Obvious "proof" of something.

I don't think OP really understands what was proven in this case.

5:5

Q anon is a pressure relief value, fed the disenfranchised hope of covert action, while Trump and the US elites reconcile their differences with the global elite in preparation of WW3 and/or the Collapes of the West.

The fuck are you on about

Precisely.

I was thinking the same thing after reading the first few most upvoted comments. They don’t sound like conspiracy theorists to me.

This Qanon continues to peak my interest aswell

Source: am reading the comments

All you are doing is being intellectually lazy because you don't want to consider another potential.

You know where to find it.

bad logic

I'll do you one better. I'll link every single one of them to date.

https://qanonposts.com/

Q did a AMA there? If that's true, I'd have to refer back to a drop he made where he said that no communication would happen outside of the 8chan platform, and that anything which did was fraudulent.

Or are you referring to Trump doing an AMA over there? If that's the case, then sure, I could believe that. Obama did an AMA here years ago. It was bullshit and I can only assume a Trump AMA would be the very same level of bullshit.