Qanon proven 100% real
0 2018-04-08 by Johnny_Oldschool
Very simple. Someone on 8chan requested that the president use the phrase "tip top" in a speech as a shoutout to the research board. Then, the president gives his Easter SOTU and says "Tip top, tippy top". After, Q posts saying "It was requested".
Case closed. Q real.
145 comments
1 JohnYossarian256 2018-04-08
You're right, I'm sure Hillary, Soros, Obama, etc, will be indicted any day now!
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
You haven't read through the drops. You should.
1 JohnYossarian256 2018-04-08
I've been well aware of Q since his inception. I had a shred of hope at first that he might be legit, but I got turned off by all his vague predictions that never came to fruition. Honestly, Q might actually be somebody close to Trump, but I think he's there to inspire false hope into his supporters. To give the illusion that something is being done to the corrupt individuals in our government.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Except for Saudi Arabia, Snowden, Rosenstein, Sessions, two different news narratives, Parkland, I mean come on man. You obviously haven't been following the drops at all.
1 JohnYossarian256 2018-04-08
I haven't followed any Q drops in about a year, what exactly has he posted so far that makes you think he's legit? I'd appreciate some links if you've got them.
1 billynlex 2018-04-08
He doesn't.
1 JohnYossarian256 2018-04-08
Seems like it.
1 billynlex 2018-04-08
I mean, thats how it goes round here anymore.
1 troy_caster 2018-04-08
He only started posting at the end of October.
1 JohnYossarian256 2018-04-08
Yeah, I think I got Q mixed up with another poster who went by FBIAnon a while ago.
1 troy_caster 2018-04-08
Ah. Makes sense.
1 pilgrimboy 2018-04-08
I haven't seen anyone big arrested or convicted, so please forgive me if the drops don't get me excited any more.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Saudi Arabia.
1 trevmon 2018-04-08
why was trump doing illuminati shit with them all touching an orb
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Cause the Simpsons writers scripted it, duh.
1 trevmon 2018-04-08
doh!
1 whacko_jacko 2018-04-08
For me, the biggest confirmation was North Korea. I think the timeline for this operation is just a little longer than most people have the patience for. I suspect it will play out into the summer and will have reached a dramatic resolution before the fall.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
I suspect you're right. And really, the mere fact that they're even entertaining the notion of denuclearizing is absolutely fucking huge.
1 VeganSavage 2018-04-08
What is your explanation to the “drops” that said both podesta bros, huma, hillary, were all in custody a year and a half ago?
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
They didn't.
1 VeganSavage 2018-04-08
Lol looks like I gave you too much credit, I thought you would say Q was trying to divert attention or something. because those drops did happen, sorry... They literally said the podesta bros are “on the run” and Hillary and huma were “in custody”
I know this because I was really into it at the time.... until that bs dropped
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Haven't heard from Tony in awhile have we. And it never said Hillary and Huma are in custody. Perhaps one of them may have been held for questioning though. Read through the drops.
1 scrubbydood 2018-04-08
If “Q said so” is going to be your schtick, then at least be able to link the related Q drops.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
The fuck are you even on about.
1 trevmon 2018-04-08
never play dumb. link some q drops or as a lurker I see that you are surrendering.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
I'll do you one better. I'll link every single one of them to date.
https://qanonposts.com/
1 garyp714 2018-04-08
Nice. You should be Q!
1 5pez____A 2018-04-08
Hrc had an ankle cast for too long. Now she has a wrist cast. It would be consistent with electronic custody.
1 ogrelin 2018-04-08
I really dislike this use of the word “drop”. It sounds like an upper class white kid trying to sound ghetto gangsta. What’s wrong with “statements”? Too establishment?
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
It's referring to dropping intelligence. I suppose "releases" could work just as well.
1 ogrelin 2018-04-08
I get the intent. Still dislike its use in this context. Many other words that would be more appropriate, just as the one you just used. I guess it’s too late to try to get people to change it now.
1 rkowna 2018-04-08
Monday, it is always Monday.
1 russianbot01 2018-04-08
I predict he will say terrific and fantastic in his next speech. -RussianbotAnon
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
It wasn't a prediction, it was a specific request. Surely you know the difference.
1 FuckJeffSessions 2018-04-08
But it was a request made on a public forum that literally anyone could read, including people in the white house. Surely you can understand how this proves nothing.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Uh, yeah, obviously it was made on a public forum. Specifically to request a shoutout to the Qresearch board. And said shoutout was delivered. Proving either the president reads the board, or someone close to him reads the board.
1 FuckJeffSessions 2018-04-08
But it doesn't make q real...
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
So your theory is that the President's staff browses 8chan for things to put in their speeches, completely separate from Q.
1 FuckJeffSessions 2018-04-08
They don't browse it specifically to find things to put in speeches, but they could have seen it and thought it would be funny to troll them.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Now that's a fantastic conspiracy theory right there.
1 FuckJeffSessions 2018-04-08
And far more likely than the white house using a shit tier image board to drop intel. You got trolled by the resident of the usa, bruh. no shame in that.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Where else would they drop it? Name me a site.
1 FuckJeffSessions 2018-04-08
Nowhere. They don't drop intel to random people on the internet. The internet is for disinfo, which is what q is.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
You can't prove a negative. Got anything else?
1 FallenRanger 2018-04-08
Oh man forget trying to reason with these people. No matter how valid a point you make you get down voted to shit. Just laugh to yourself at the bots and shills on here who think they can effect the outcome by down voting you. Those of us with eyes and ears see and hear you and appreciate that you're not intimidated by their garbage. Power to you man!
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Thanks dude! I do my best. Generally I don't waste my time here any more. I was just bored this afternoon.
1 garthock 2018-04-08
Yep, what a great attitude you have, just blame anyone or anything with a contradictory opinion as a shill or bot.
1 Bmdubd 2018-04-08
"hah its more likely Trump completed the request given to Q because he coincidentally saw it on the Q forum even though Q is fake and the President spends his time following LARPs"
1 garthock 2018-04-08
No, they browse T_D and they are well aware of Qanon.
Hell he even did an AMA over there so... that just goes to show you how much they do browse it.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Q did a AMA there? If that's true, I'd have to refer back to a drop he made where he said that no communication would happen outside of the 8chan platform, and that anything which did was fraudulent.
Or are you referring to Trump doing an AMA over there? If that's the case, then sure, I could believe that. Obama did an AMA here years ago. It was bullshit and I can only assume a Trump AMA would be the very same level of bullshit.
1 garthock 2018-04-08
yes, Trump did an AMA over there, so you can be sure his people monitor that site closely.
1 Vault32 2018-04-08
'Requesting' trump says tip-top would be a fairly easy bet, he's used the phrase before- he has a very limited vocabulary of superlative adjectives.
1 DernaldTermp 2018-04-08
Or Trump is a huge troll.
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-04-08
That's not what happened.
https://imgur.com/gallery/yaz8f
As you can see, the anon asked Q to tell Trump to say tippy top in January. Trump ended up using the phrase 3 months later. This is hardly a coincidence, considering this is a phrase he's used several times in the past. Here he is saying tippy tippy top in 2016.
https://youtu.be/fEDW83e5-NM
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Lawls, just staight copied and pasted that from your damage control files eh. He doesn't say "tip top" in that video, does he. He does however say it after it was requested, bot the requested "tip top" followed by his "tippy top". And it wasn't 3 months. It was two.
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-04-08
I guess you didnt watch the video. Half through through he says tippy tippy top a couple times and then says he loves saying that.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
You didn't read my comment properly.
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-04-08
I read it. Trump used one of his common phrases 2 months after some anon requested it and that's mind blowing to you? Any person could do what Q does. Anybody. All he does is ask questions relevant to the news and make predictions that dont come true. Where's the Hillary tape dude? Q said Obama lawyered up like a month ago. What happened to that? When is the terrorist picture of Obama with an ak-47 coming out? I'll bet you a thousand dollars that non of those things happen ever. I can hit you up in 3 months if you want.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Read through the actual drops.
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-04-08
I've been following this for months dude. I read through the drops. He heavily implied that a Hillary tape was about to drop. He said Obama lawyered up. Now he's saying the internet is gonna blow up when a terrorist image of Obama surfaces. This stuff is complete bullshit that never came true. At what point will his failed predictions make you wonder if hes not who he says he is? How long? Will you be waiting a year for this Hillary tape and Obama picture? How long does Q have until you admit he was wrong?
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Pathetic.
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-04-08
So I guess you wont answer any of my questions. I guess it's hard to hear that something you put so much faith in isnt true. I get it. Let me know when the Hillary tape and the Obama picture come out.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
You're bad at this.
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-04-08
Obviously not considering you've completely shut down at this point. Wont address any of my questions. Now you're just saying I'm lame. Cool man, well I'll keep following the drops. Looking forward to the next failed prediction and we can talk again.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Come on man, same shit, different day. You try to set the rules for your own game, and if I refuse to play it, then I'm the loser. Tell you what. We can have a skype conversation about it if you want.
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-04-08
Oh shit you want to Skype with me? I didnt set any rules dude. What rules are you referring to? I asked you a few questions and you're deciding you wont answer them. How long a leash does Q have? If this Hillary tape and Obama picture dont come out a year from now, what does that mean for his predictions?
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Send me your skype address and we can discuss it.
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-04-08
Alright then. I got family over right now. I'll hit you up later tonight.
1 Irishconspiracy 2018-04-08
please update us on how this probable trainwreck goes.
1 FallenRanger 2018-04-08
You want to know how funny this is. I've been doing what little I can to tip the balance by giving you upvotes and giving some of these guys down votes. On one of your comments scored -1 it literally wouldn't let me upvote it. It kept highlighting both upvote and downvote and no matter how much I clicked upvote it wouldn't change the points. On one of my clicks i accidentally hit downvote and it went right away. At least it let me remove the downvote. This is shill city buddy.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Yeah it's pretty obvious these days isn't it.
1 trevmon 2018-04-08
you took a massive L in this thread
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Explain how without using the letter E
1 jswilson99 2018-04-08
Are you kidding? You realize Cambridge Analytica tracks nearly everything we say online and then helps the President form his message based on what people say. Catchy slogans like Lock Her Up and Drain The Swamp we’re literally invented by random people online and then adopted by the President. Just because he says something and tips his cap to Q Anon or whatever, doesn’t mean Trump is a good President. Hundreds of Billions of dollars being funneled into the American war machine to fight Israel’s enemies while simultaneously bankrupting us is not the actions of an America First President. Allowing a private federal reserve to continue manipulating markets and continue quantitative easing policies without investigation is not something an American First President would do. There are so many things a President could do and say to prove that he’s not an establishment puppet and Trump has done nothing
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
I know other people on this board are stupid, but I'm not.
1 garyp714 2018-04-08
You either know it or you don't but he minute you have to bring it up, you're the one not sure.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
I 100% disagree.
1 garyp714 2018-04-08
I would hope so.
1 KrazyKiwiKid 2018-04-08
Debatable
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Listen, I'm a master debater.
........wait...
1 garyp714 2018-04-08
True for lock her up as phrasing but drain the swamp is old and both ideas are as old as American politics.
Anyone thinking Drain the swamp was a new thing, get ready to hear it again in a few years and roll your eyes that anyone falls for that nonsense. Hope and Change, Drain the swamp, etc etc. Nothing new under the sun.
1 nisaaru 2018-04-08
Well, I don't think it's in the government interest to acknowledge and support voices which "pretend" to be speaking for them which Q obviously does. That's a serious communication problem they wouldn't want to create. Therefore I don't consider your explanation likely.
You make assumptions about how "easy" things are for the current president without knowing the factors involved. Who are the players and how do they project their interest. What are the risks to do this and that in what order? We just don't truly know and therefore assuming Trump could just do X even if it's in his interest which we don't know either is pretty short sighted. I don't say this here to white wash what Trump does or not does but just to question the simplicity of the situation.
Here's the older red team planner post which discusses more military aspects but has a few points which should always be considered.
https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/47fl0n/is_a_nonviolent_revolution_feasible_in_the_us_or/d0cxwev/
1 jswilson99 2018-04-08
Oh please. Everyone running for President knows damn well that comes with risks. If he were truly anti-establishment he would certainly be willing to put his body on the line for the betterment of humanity. The fact that Trump can’t even honestly say that the stock market is a bubble, the fact that he can’t even admit something as small as that proves he’s an establishment puppet. If he can’t even say that without getting killed, imagine what would happen if he actually threatened the unelected power structure in the State Department, the Pentagon, and the Federal Reserve. The guy is a total establishment puppet, and even if he isn’t, he’s still a disgrace in my eyes for not exposing the sheer corruption that exists and not putting his body on the line
1 nisaaru 2018-04-08
When some president says that it will impact the market negatively, obviously. He'll get bad PR from the people and institutions whose paper value gets shredded with real affects at the bottom.
What's the gain outside of satisfying you?
They'll ride the economical dead horse as long as they can anyway before they aren't sure they have a working alternative. We should all pray that they find another alternative than WW3.
1 WhydoesNASAlie 2018-04-08
I have no interest in politics but the amount of pushback and similar talking point regarding Q (think low iq snarky comments) made me believe Q to be legitimate in his arena. Sometimes the shills tip their hand
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Precisely.
1 GuyDreidelman 2018-04-08
I was thinking the same thing after reading the first few most upvoted comments. They don’t sound like conspiracy theorists to me.
1 pilgrimboy 2018-04-08
I'll let you in on something. People who are into conspiracies don't have to believe in every conspiracy.
1 GuyDreidelman 2018-04-08
Wha??? Noooooo...
To me, a conspiracy theorist keeps an open mind. Too many people here are quick to downplay and disregard Qanon, just like they were with P(edo)izza gate once that started getting some really strong traction.
1 pilgrimboy 2018-04-08
I was a fan of Q for a few weeks. It seemed like nothing came true and it was just delivering unwarranted optimism that Trump was going to drain the swamp. And I want that, but I'm not sure he will.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Read the drops. Saudi Arabia, North Korea, Parkland, Sessions, Rosenstein, two narratives, and Snowden.
Like holy shit nobody fucking reads any more.
1 pilgrimboy 2018-04-08
Can you cite the relevant portions of the drops?
1 Iceboundend 2018-04-08
This Qanon continues to peak my interest aswell
Source: am reading the comments
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Read the aggregate site. It's a lot more interesting than reddit comments.
https://qanonposts.com/
1 trevmon 2018-04-08
bad logic
1 WhydoesNASAlie 2018-04-08
In life, yes. On reddit, no.
1 MalikTauss 2018-04-08
Where's your evidence?
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Suadi Arabia, snowden, parkland, sessions, rosenstein, two narratives, read through the drops.
1 MrTinFoilHat187 2018-04-08
Where is this?
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Read through the drops. Here's one of the aggregate sites.
https://qanonposts.com/
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
R/Conspiracy: Hurrrr Q is a LARP!
Also r/conspiracy: Violently downvotes literally every single thread which discusses Q what so ever unless it's to discredit the drops.
1 OrangeCladAssassin 2018-04-08
Those 2 things make perfect sense. It’s a larp, so people downvote it for being a waste of time.
How many times has “Q” predicted some huge news, or Hillary being locked up? This nonsense has been going on for months and months
1 Irishconspiracy 2018-04-08
this
Q doesn't belong on conspiracy.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
You haven't read the drops. As I tell everyone, read through them. All.
1 OrangeCladAssassin 2018-04-08
I’m not going to waste my time. That garbage has been going on so long and had so many “next week x will happen” and it was bullshit. Why bother? Link me to real evidence not a coincidence 3 months apart
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Firstly, it hasn't. Read the drops. Secondly, It wasn't three months. You haven't read the drops.
1 OrangeCladAssassin 2018-04-08
Are you gonna link me to an archive of the drops? Is there any site that will connect the drops to events that occurred? Or will you just keep saying read the drops? Because that really doesn’t make your case any stronger
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
https://qanonposts.com/
1 TheRisenOsiris 2018-04-08
You are coming up with every possible excuse to not take in new information.
Why?
1 OrangeCladAssassin 2018-04-08
How long has the Q shit been going on? How many predictions have come and gone with nothing. It’s bullshit. Show me proof for me to reconsider it.
There comes a point where you have to determine a source isn’t worth your time.
1 TheRisenOsiris 2018-04-08
All you are doing is being intellectually lazy because you don't want to consider another potential.
You know where to find it.
1 OrangeCladAssassin 2018-04-08
Show me the proof. Give me sources. Give me evidence.
1 TheRisenOsiris 2018-04-08
You should specify what you are asking for. Then after doing that, consider the context.
Then, maybe.
1 The_Guilty_Jester 2018-04-08
Why dont you show us a few of the times he predicted Hillary will be locked up? That sounds like conjecture.
Lying doesnt make your side look better, and if you have to lie its an easy way to know youre wrong, friend.
1 The_Guilty_Jester 2018-04-08
Paging /u/OrangeCladAssassin , still waiting on this. To quote you, "Show me evidence."
1 OrangeCladAssassin 2018-04-08
I guess I replied to the wrong guy. I don’t waste my time archiving that shit, but the burden of proof is on the people claiming Q is real
1 The_Guilty_Jester 2018-04-08
Ahahaha. So you have no evidence of your claim? So you lied? If you have to lie to make a point, its not a very good one mate.
1 OrangeCladAssassin 2018-04-08
Do you really expect that every time some bullshit claim was made I’d try to save it? This Q shit has been going on forever so I’m not gonna waste my time digging through those archives.
Q has been going on so long that one would think there’d be so sort of proof or evidence. But nope.
Again the burden of proof is people who say Q is legit. You can believe whatever larps you want though
1 pilgrimboy 2018-04-08
What specific things should we look for in the coming weeks?
1 bradok 2018-04-08
An interesting observation OP. I have personally been a Q skeptic from the beginning, and while I do not believe that this proves Q is legit, I will definitely file it away in my head and keep an eye out moving forward. Very interesting and thanks for bringing it to attention.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
And this isn't even the most damning thing. If people were actually reading through the drops and following the news closely you'd see that this is very clearly legitimate.
1 richtaco91 2018-04-08
Seems like liberal conspiracy guys are having a hard time with Q movement.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Yup.
1 UncleSnake3301 2018-04-08
Q predicted this.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Hahahahaha
1 rodental 2018-04-08
That is interesting. I think at this point Q has more or less proven that he is sone sort of insider. Hasn't proven that he isn't full of shit though.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
That's one spin I've seen for it, sure. "Q is real, BUT, how do we know he's a good guy", ect ect.
I always just say to people, read through the drops. Decide for yourself.
1 rodental 2018-04-08
I have read through them, and I'm inclined to agree with those who say he never actually predicts much. But on the other hand there have been too many coincidences to just dismiss it as another larp imo.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
It really has nothing to do with "predictions" and everything to do with research.
1 nisaaru 2018-04-08
Agreed. To me it's clear these people are part of the government since last November. Therefore calling this a LARP makes no sense to me whatsoever.
If people would just call it a psyop there would be a lot more common ground. That still leaves a lot room to discuss the quality of informations. Like what is true, what is disinformation and who the targets are.
1 Sneeeaky_Jesus 2018-04-08
Isn’t this a conspiracy board? Lol. Most of the top comments don’t sound like conspiracy theorists to me. They sound like the people that laugh when we mention anything deviating beyond the narrative in real life.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Yeah this place is bullshit now. I barely come here. Plenty of way better subs.
1 hylozics 2018-04-08
he was also standing next to a white rabbit...
1 irishbastard3000 2018-04-08
While watching Godfather III. And reading Alice In Wonderland.
1 RocketSurgeon22 2018-04-08
Look at all the haters. The Easter Bunny was also looking more like Alice in Wonderland Bunny.
1 yourbillsaredue 2018-04-08
The issue is it may mean his handlers are listening and are proving they control what trump says.
Let that sink in.
1 let_that_sink_in 2018-04-08
Again? The fuck does it want this time?
1 OrangeCladAssassin 2018-04-08
Because I don’t have the shit saved or archived because it seemed like nonsense from the get go to me.
My side? What side is that, the one that asks for proof? Please, show me proof that this 4chan bullshit is real, I’m open to evidence, but there never seems to be any. All this shit just similar to cold readings Or Nostradamus nonsense. Speak in vague riddles and people will stretch it to fit their narrative and try to make it make it make sense.
The burden of proof is on the people making the claims Q is legit.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Who are you even responding to?
1 KrazyKiwiKid 2018-04-08
He mentioned watch FB next week.
That was a week before Zuck sold $300,000,000 in shares and all he'll broke loose in FB's world
1 Spiel_Foss 2018-04-08
1) Request common phrase from Trump's very limited vocabulary,
2) Trump eventually says phrase months later,
3) Obvious "proof" of something.
I don't think OP really understands what was proven in this case.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
5:5
1 ragegenx 2018-04-08
Q anon is a pressure relief value, fed the disenfranchised hope of covert action, while Trump and the US elites reconcile their differences with the global elite in preparation of WW3 and/or the Collapes of the West.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
The fuck are you on about
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Precisely.
1 GuyDreidelman 2018-04-08
I was thinking the same thing after reading the first few most upvoted comments. They don’t sound like conspiracy theorists to me.
1 Iceboundend 2018-04-08
This Qanon continues to peak my interest aswell
Source: am reading the comments
1 TheRisenOsiris 2018-04-08
All you are doing is being intellectually lazy because you don't want to consider another potential.
You know where to find it.
1 trevmon 2018-04-08
bad logic
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
I'll do you one better. I'll link every single one of them to date.
https://qanonposts.com/
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-04-08
Q did a AMA there? If that's true, I'd have to refer back to a drop he made where he said that no communication would happen outside of the 8chan platform, and that anything which did was fraudulent.
Or are you referring to Trump doing an AMA over there? If that's the case, then sure, I could believe that. Obama did an AMA here years ago. It was bullshit and I can only assume a Trump AMA would be the very same level of bullshit.