Are you trolling or being serious?

I know, it’s like this has got to be either a joke or some kind of trick question or something. lol

The shilling is real in this thread. How much does the deep state pay you?

Seriously, what are you having trouble comprehending about OPs question?

If I am understanding the question, the OP was asking why there was no sign of the iceberg in the wreckage. That’s a stupid question.

No. He's asking why, in the wreckage found below, is there no indication that the ship hit an iceberg.

See, now that’s why I thought it was a trick question. It was implied that there should be signs of iceberg in the wreckage, and that just seemed silly.

They found the gash on the side also a fire played a part

What you'd find in the wreckage would be traces of Titanic's sister ship the Olympic. Since that was the actual ship that was deliberately sunk, for many reasons including a simple classic case of insurance fraud using a body double.

I just read up on this and it's actually a pretty convincing theory. Thanks.

When you consider the facts of the case, the owners of White Star at the time, the fact that the sister ship Olympic was damaged and was not covered under insurance unless a full sinking occurred.. it all makes much more sense that they deliberately manufactured this event for many many reasons beneficial to the banks and deep state, than what they expect you and I to believe.. that a bunch of expert naval men went full speed into ice bergs through dark and fog and crashed the ship like fucking morons? Doubt it, I'll go with the former theory. Cheers.

They didn't find it, because it was still floating and continued thusly until it got broken down and, ultimately, melted.

Ssshhhh

The Titanic is such a great conspiracy theory, that not many people know about. From the sinking of it and why (creation of the Federal Reserve), to how it was actually found (Top Secret mission to find lost nuclear submarines/technology).

Those are peanuts. Get on my level

...and what level is that, because what you said was like the tip of the iceberg? ^{<---see what I did there}

Exactly, lol

Removed. Trolling.

Based on some comments here that's a broad assumption lol

My guess is that some folks thought you just misphrased your title.

Wow, seriously this is getting out of control. You need to make it clear what defines "trolling", and who wears the pants? Some anon commenters, using the trigger word "troll", then you swoop in?" My gracious..

Dude. He is asking why there was no iceberg found in the wreckage. He's trolling.

But, while we are at it, I love this topic and it would be great if you posted what you thought he meant in a new post.

Dude, why not just let the discussion play out?? Why the heavy handed orwellion removal of thought? Seems a tad jackbooted, bro.. Incidentally, I did not take OPs question that way, so your premise is not true in my case.

I thought he was asking why there is no indication on the wreckage below that the ship hit an iceberg. Not trolling.

Make a new post. This one was a troll.

How about no, and quit deleting shit that should be posted here, and maybe delete the meaningless wall of MSM links littering this site 247. I'm out, thanks for the chat.

Hey mod, what is trolling about OPs post? Seriously are you kidding with deleting this? Unbelievable.

Re-read the title.

That doesn't answer my question. I've read the title, and I am asking you what about it is trolling.

Ok, you tell me why there was no iceberg found in the wreckage of the titanic.

So much about misreading the title 😌