Are they deleting Alex Jones' channel AGAIN? We really should keep track of how frequently they do that.

They never did or were going to. AJ lied, as usual

Are you really trying to tell me Alex Jones would lie to make a quick buck off sensationalism?

Colour me shocked!

or were going to.

Are you an employe at YouTube?

YouTubers are always getting shut down. YouTube released a statement saying they weren't going to shut down Infowars and they didn't shut it down. Do you work there?

They’ve deleted his channel a few times but I’ve always noticed it come back. Yeah, I hope someone’s keeping a count on that

No they have not.

His channel has definitely disappeared before, maybe the deletion was reinstated quickly before anyone could complain

Maybe we should collect the links and videos so we can personally upload them on the next gen video platform.

I don't know what I'm doing but I'm good at voice overs. Someone's makes a video I could do the audio.

That would end up an absolute shitshow lol. Terrible half functioning service with money all gone.

Go to 153news.net for archived videos of everything.

bitchute.com

The things are going worse, there will not be a next gen free video platform.

Maybe we should collect the links and videos so we can personally upload them on the next gen video platform.

Info preservation/conservation is enough reason. You don't have to upload anything. Just keep it safe and lay low, put it in an envelope and write on that with a marker "crucial Youtube videos backup for museums or family only"

A lot of sites are being changed to limit free speech. It's a change I've noticed just about everywhere. I'm beginning to wonder what the point to it all is?

It's a good theory! People need to be controlled /s

I have this theory that you have fetal alcohol syndrome and have read no more than two books in your life.

Being anti gun and pro equality of pay is not radical leftism. These are token issues used to divide people.

Radical leftism involves avowing a differently ordered society around concepts and principles other than property.

Words have meanings, look them up. For real, your complete ignorance on this makes my brain hurt.

Youtube was never a good place to do research in the first place.

Do you even know what free speech is? Are you seriously saying that YouTube doesn't have a right to filter content on their own platform?

Here is my thought on that, I think the youtube, facebook, etc. are developing faster than our laws. These services have become the equivelent of town squares before technology was invented. Thus if they are going to allow any opinions, they must allow all opinions good or bad

They do. They do have a right to filter, but they can't turn around and say they're an open platform for all content creators. I'm more upset with the double standards and hypocrisy of the whole censor war.

Oh here you fuckin go. Did everyone forget that YouTube is Google? Why is this censorship acceptable to you?

There is a precedent set when you force a private company to bake a gay cake.

You can't have your gay cake and eat it too.

I bet you had your panties twisted by the net neutrality repeal, and yet here you are defending content providers who railroad content they disagree with...

Nice straw man. You're going to presuppose what my option was on a completely separate topic, and build your argument off that? Nice try, but nah.

So tell us then, are you for or against net neutrality.

Because I don't think you fully grasp that neutrality means.

It's not about right. It's about consequences. Of course they have a legal right to do whatever they have a right to do. Even if they do, there will be a decline in open conversation about many ideas and thus a lack of coherence in our collective mind. It will lead be replace more by a centralized decision making process of which information our minds get to see and discuss. This limits us and empowers those who decide what we can see. THAT matters regardless of a red herring that is obvious.

Is there a good site to archive videos?

Also, use hooktube to steal views from YT.

Wow. Just did a search for a bunch of stuff. It's crazy. Definitely alarming. Hopefully somebody comes up with a new video site that gets traction soon.

The Google/YouTube/23&Me, etc., consortium is evil as hell and a product of it.

The reason that YouTube doesn't have any serious competition is that it isn't profitable. Google actually runs it at a loss.

Yup. You wonder why actually... why run something at a loss? what exactly are they gaining apart from 'branding'?

Totally normal to run a part of business at loss, especially when it means keeping the customers tied to their other products. Non story.

Yep, called a loss leader. Supermarkets often do it with some products to get you in store then raise margins on other products.

Google make money off your data Youtube is just another way of getting your data.

also easier to hide your money when operating at a loss!

Twitter also hasn't made a profit for 7 out of 8 years that it has been up.

Viewing habit data to pump into their advertising program, which is where they make money. Never forget, if it's free then you're the product.

yeah but apparently that isn't even enough to turn a profit...

Google's advertising is it's main business. It's very, very profitable. All the other services/sites funnel your data into those databases to create a better product for advertisers: hypertargeted ads.

It’s profitable now and has been for at least a year.

The reason that YouTube doesn't have any serious competition is that it isn't profitable.

This guy gets it.

Often unmentioned cause is adblocker. I have a friend who runs a descent channel. 90% of his watches had adblock. Even his smallish 20,000 subscriber channel would provide him full living income if no one had an adblocker.

Would it be possible to have a YouTube type service that uses bit-torrents? The huge downside would be that you would have to download a video before you can view it. And you would rely on hundreds to thousands to millions of people willing to seed the files. But it can start niche for videos that don't make it on YouTube, then grow to the place you'd rather share your videos.

It would be super cheap to set up and see if it can grow.

A few weeks ago, just trying to find something to watch on YouTube with a friend, she types in "conspiracy theories" or something right along with those words. We went through like 5 videos before we found something that wasn't "debunking" or completely talking shit about conspiracy theorists. It was fucked up.

23&Me

what does 23&me have to do with anything?

People voluntarily submit their dna into a big database. All of a sudden, you can't get insurance for certain illnesses because someone in your family has the genes that make them susceptible to this illness. Law enforcement can track you down as being somewhere when something went wrong. All sorts of other unintended consequences just because your mother or sister wanted to see what percentage of random minority they are.

Any links to this actually happening?

If this is true, it would be extremely easy to compile the data. Compare health insurance denials and increased premiums between people who have used 23&Me and people who haven't.

Not that may people use 23&Me and it seems very foolish to mine that data to save a few bucks, when it can easily be proven.

The Google/YouTube/23&Me, etc.

I wonder (((who))) runs those companies...

Pattern recognition is hate speech.

Removed. Rule 1

What did 23&me do? Aren't they just an ancestry company?

They keep all your stuff and the CEO is the Google dude's sister-in-law.

Mike Adams of NaturalNews.com is launching a video service to run against YouTube. He's using block chain technology and already has tens of thousands of people signed up. It'll be released soon

I haven't really been a fan of that guy since he cut all his 9/11 stuff, and I know he censors comments because he censored mine on multiple occasions.

But he's still better than GoogleTube.

The people being the same videos I have seen.

You know how in court they convict people saying "it's one out of a million" well there are over 7 billion of us. That leaves lots of room for dopplegangers.

Aprapos anecdotal tale:

I was at a bike race once, with my wife, and went up to a woman selling drinks.

Well they hire pretty hot scantily clad women to do this job it seems and I was being nonchalant about checking her out. All of a sudden she goes "Hey Steve!!' and hugs me.

Didn't go over too well with the Mrs.

I say "oh you have me mistaken for someone else"

And she hits my arm and goes "Oh, so... Steve!"

It would seem that there are random people who look alike.

As for YouTube... Yeah it's shit. It was once it started to monetize it started going downhill. Now it's too big for its britches.

That reminds me of the time my mom and I saw her doppelganger. We were at a stop sign and my mom quickly glanced at the rear view mirror and had to do a double take. She told me look at the woman in the car behind us, and so I did. It was a massive mindfuck seeing my mom in the car behind me and in the car with me at the same time.

I only searched it because I was looking for a couple old videos that conclusively proved that MSM used the same people under different names for different tragedies.

And this where you've created false memories, and your post collapses.

No false memories there, I’ve seen some pretty conclusive evidence of crisis actors in sandy hook and Boston bombings. I love the 9:11 crisis actor who seemed to know the towers came down because of fire before any civil engineers had a chance to pretend to investigate. I couldn’t believe how blatant it was. It was so blatant and obvious I’m just shocked there wasn’t more people demanding answers.

?

I’d share the vid but it’s not there. None of them are.

No great loss there. Youtube is a terrible place to do research, so I wouldn't put much weight behind anything there without further evidence.

When it’s clearly a tv interview on the day of 9:11 it’s a good a source as any

Interviews done on the day of an incident are also not good source material. Nobody is sure what happened yet, everyone has a theory, confusion and fog of war reigns. Reporters are desperate to grab headlines and ratings, so they'll grab a hold of whatever they can find that seems juicy and try to sell it.

Standing next to secret service ?

https://streamable.com/mzi67

There you go found it in the end.

Mark Walsh a confirmed actor

Um. Huh? There was nothing there. Just a fairly accurate description of what the event looked like.

Yeah well we can all have differing opinions as to what that shows. Fell because of structural failure mostly due to fires ?

And the fact he is an actor ? That’s not disputed that’s a fact. Doesn’t it strike you as a little strange ? You’re probably not paid to find it strange so I’ll not worry about the answer. But still.

Yrah. As I was watching the towers burn, I was worried myself about the girders holding up under that fire.

Then the first one fell. I felt ill. I had been right, the structure couldn't take it.

I congratulate you on your engineering degree and the ability to see a tower falling due to fire when none other in history did. You must be worth a lot of money to someone

Thank you. You are correct, I do have a mechanical engineering degree. I work in Structures and am trained in explosives. And you are right about my wealth, as I do indeed make six figures.

Excellent. Then you can explain how Newton’s third law was compromised in the tower fall. Really appreciate your time on this as it’s been confusing me all this time. I know there’s an obvious answer so look forward to it

Simple. It was not compromised.

Ahh, okay, I did some googleing. I think you're referring to some sort of "10 falling floors should only collapse the 10 floors below them" thing, which has nothing to do with Newton's laws in the first place. Maybe you can explain how that term got applied? If you think that is an "Action and reaction" thing, then you need to review Newton's laws, as you've got a fundamental misunderstanding of them.

Let's use some round numbers. You slag the 90th floor of a 100-story building. The 89th floor is designed to take the static load of the 10 floors above it. It is not designed to take the dynamic load of decelerating those 10 floors once they start moving. So it collapses, too. Buildings are not vehicles, they are not designed with crumple zones, nor are they designed to act as brakes. To do so would be a massive increase in weight and cost, and would make skyscrapers impractical.

Now, to the 88th floor. It's now got the dynamic load of 11 floors falling on it. It, too, was designed for static load, so it goes. 12 floors fall and hit the 87th. The weight of the debris in motion keeps increasing. An already-crumbled floor has the same weight as an intact floor, but no longer adsorbs any energy itself, so the effects get worse every time a floor collapses.

I'm having to take guesses on your vague comments to Newton, so I can't tell if I'm even addressing your concerns.

For every action there is an equal or opposite reaction.

So the top floors collapse on the bottom floors. The top floor of the bottom bit of the building collapses. The bottom floor of the top but if the building collapses. It’s that simple. You are suggesting a smaller part o the building acted like a hammer on the fr later part. It can’t

I see. You don't understand Newton. Newton's Laws are physics, not engineering.

Action and reaction talks about what forces are applied. They do not apply is the strength of the material becomes involved, such as a segment of a building collapsing.

Newton has nothing to do with this.

Newton has everything to do with this. And you call yourself an engineer and explosives expert ?

There are countless engineers demonstrating this. It’s pointless arguing over what I do or don’t understand. I understand when someone is more adapt at an argument than actually worrying about facts. That’s enough.

You are correct, I am bad at arguing. We engineers are hardly known for our social skills.

I disagree you are very good at it. Don’t do yourself an injustice. I just can’t imagine what engineer you maybe when you think physics and engineering are two separate disciplines.

The actual phrase going around when I was a student was "If you love physics, but can't handle the math, become an engineer."

And yes, the two are absolutely different disciplines. They have different degrees. My old university had separate buildings for Mechanical engineering vs physics.

Ok they may be different disciplines in college for a degree but surely you must know about load capacity and fire resistance etc. That’s physics.

No. Load capacity and fire resistance are engineering, they are not physics.

A "hammer" is the wrong analogy. A hammer delivers the same force every time it is swung. In the case of a collapsing building, the force is increasing every time the weight of a new floor is added. Hammers do not get heavier each time they strike.

I am a real engineer.

Newton's laws are of motion. They say absolutely nothing about whether a smaller object can "crush" a larger object. The ability for one object to crush another depends heavily on the material properties of the object. Newton's laws are about motion.

Newton's third law does not even apply here, let alone declare this to be "impossible".

It says everything about it. If you want to drive a nail in you use a hammer. If you want to drive a stake it the ground you don’t use a hammer that is Newton’s third law.

Um. I do use a hammer to drives stakes in the ground. How do you do it?

I use a mallet. It’s heavier and easier.

I'm a fan of the 3-pound sledge.

Okay.... I think whomever wrote that is making an assumption that all of the debris is cleanly ejected out the sides of the building. That would change things.

But that's not what happened. The 10th floor of the building is not going to survive when the 90 floors above get crumbled into rubble and drop on it.

At no point is a "smaller" object hitting a "bigger" object.

Back to the analogy: Take out the 90th floor. You now have 10 floors landing on one floor, then 89th. It collapses.

Now you have 11 floors landing on the 88th. It collapses.

Now 12 land on the 87th. It collapses.

Another way to look at it: Chop off floors 100 thru 88 and put them on the ground as a 12 story building. Slag the 2nd floor. It, plus the top 10, crush the first floor.

Reset to an intact building and add another floor. Take out the same one. 11 floors crush one, then 12 floors crush the new 1st floor.

Do you actually think 9/11 wasn't real? My uncle died in 9/11. This is highly offensive

Where did you get the impression I thought 9:11 wasn’t real ? I said there was a crisis actor (yes it was confirmed he was an actor by the way) interviewed on the day of 9:11 on the street saying how the towers came down “by the fires” in an attempt to instill the nonsense that they came down by fires. It’s on the net somewhere I just can’t find it (like the post here suggests they have been removed but why ?)

Keep in mind that when people say proof they mean still images of varying quality showing people from different angles while a robot voice insists that no one could deny this 'evidence'

except even the shit quality videos should still be up and not censored entirely.

"There is no truth. There never was." This my friends is whats called a useful idiot.

10 reasons why youtube is cancer with red ring and arrow pointing to a roast chicken. video narrated by robo voice

So you didn't immediately find stuff that confirmed your priors and you jump to the conclusion that YouTube is hiding it from you?

If I understand it correctly, this should be the logical conclusion of this type of search, which would be great if it was so predictable, I would love to be corrected however.

Youtube was never a good place to do research in the first place. Any videos you might have found in the past wouldn't be worth much unless you had found other sources to back them up.

I wish more conspiracy theorists would think like you, everytime I get into a discussion, YouTube videos everytime.

You're over your target if you're taking flak

btw fuck David hogg. god damn I hate that fucking cunt so much

Youtube have made public statements about changing algorithms to deliver fewer videos from 'questionable sources'. Its not blatant agenda pushing its a public stance designed to stop the site from losing money.

Even 'alternative news sources' as main stream as Phillip DeFranco have mentioned issues with their videos no longer showing up on the front page, even for subscribers, or trending.

One time I tried to find flat earth videos where flat earthers explain why they believe what they believe on Youtube and I was redirected to all these videos that prove the earth isn't flat and videos making fun of stupid claims made by people who were obviously trolling and made for kids. I understand the evidence that explains why the world is not flat and I believe it, but I just wanted to see what flat-earthers believed. Instead of popular videos where the flat-earthers explain their beliefs, I am directed to big corporations that making it a joke. I don't care whether you understand basic physics and science to support round earth, or just believe in a flat earth with based on your ideas, but I think we can all agree that censorship is getting worse.

How can it be flat & hollow at the same time is what puzzles me 🤔

In regards to the flat earth theory, "flat" refers to the earth not being a sphere. It does not mean the earth is flat in a literal sense. With this in mind, the earth could be both "flat" and hollow...think of a conical shape as just one example where the center portion is hollowed out beneath the surface.

The square Earth theory?

Not all conspiracies are believed by the same individuals, obviously.

I wonder if people who watch videos on the Apollo missions get recommended videos on how it was fake. The same with people who watch outer space and Earth videos, do they get recommended videos that offer an alternative Earth shape theory? Because I get videos recommended to me all the time about how the Moon Landing totally happened, and Earth is definitely a spinning ball nothing to see here, debunking flat earth and so on. I have a feeling these recommendations are lopsided. It's okay, because for most conspiracy theory-minded people the corporatocracy trying so hard is just further evidence of a conspiracy to hide the truth, and will only eventually backfire on them.

You get reccommend videos based off your watch history.

I know. I was theorizing the recommendations are lopsided. Is this even a place for conspiracy theory anymore?

Corbettreport just made a video about alternative plattforms.
And yes, also happened to me cause I was showing crisis actors to a friend and it was really hard to find stuff.

Yeah you get David Hogg stuff because it's trending. Hell, it's what you were looking for. And yes, more people have likely watched and hit like on videos debunking those stupid theories than ones spreading them.

Thank you. It blows me away that nobody else has brought up this point. I’m not saying YouTube isn’t censoring, but it’s much more likely just their algorithms directing you to the more popular videos.

Okay so I don't buy any of this crisis actor bullshit. I will however talk about YouTube. You realize that one the moment you upload something on YouTube they own it and there for have the right to do what ever they want with it right? And two, that YouTube is by no means the only video streaming site on the internet.

You might think that YouTube has some moral responsibility to provide a even platform for free speech but there terms of service totally disagrees with you. YouTube has guidelines and whatnot but these are not etched in stone, and are loose and open to interpretation. Like how nudity is banned from YouTube but you can find videos on breast feeding. Really though you give them the right to remove a video for literally any reason the second you upload it on there site.

Call it censorship, disagree with what they consider factual, stomp your feet, only use LiveLeak. YouTube always has and always will reserve the right to remove any video for any reason. As a matter of fact I'm pretty sure every streaming video site on the internet reserves that right. Sites like Streamable and LiveLeak just choose not to try and steer the direction of content. Upload a video of a murder that is currently being investigated or some child porn and watch how fast those sites swing the banhammer.

Sandy hook is like that. I started researching it sometime last year. Videos and everything were easy to find. Then suddenly they have either been removed, or made impossible to find with the search functionality.

Just sort by date uploaded date instead and you don't get all the MSM narrative and you get some actual conspiracy results.

Write typos mistakes. You'll find what your looking for.

Because there are more videos debunking compared to ones trying to prove it

Yesterday I was looking for a single fucking video calling out the rapper “Logic” who is quite possibly the music industry’s own little antichrist. Not only are there no negative videos of this guy, there are virtually no negative comments on any of his interviews or songs.

Just curious, why is he the antichrist of rap? I've just never heard that before and I'm interested to learn more.

Disclaimer : I like his music.

The dude is a saint what the fuck are you on about? Have you ever seen any of his interviews? He’s got great morals and spreads an incredibly positive message. It’s not strange to me that nobody is hating on him, it is strange to me that you’d call someone who stands up against racial discrimination and advocates for suicide awareness as “the antichrist of the music industry”

I think that guy is a pedo. Maybe not the antichrist but for sure a pusher of the agenda.

Why would celebrities want to symbolize the devil and pedophilia in their music videos? What purpose would that serve other than to let others know their secret agendas? What agenda would that even be? I think you’re over analyzing things man, and definitely giving these artists wayyy too much credit when it comes to their secret agendas. Bathtubs and mirrors are common within every single household it’s not weird that they show up in several music videos.

I’m all for symbolism and digging deeper but only in cases where it makes sense. None of the celebrities you listed are even smart enough to use symbolism in their videos to portray some dark message. You can watch literally any video and come up with a crazy conspiracy about the “symbolism” used if you claim common items are symbolizing some deeper message.

If you really think about what you’re saying, given the “symbols” you provided, you’re pretty much claiming that all of Hollywood and the music industry is one giant conspiracy pushing the agenda of the devil through symbolism that nobody even notices except for people like you who are looking for a deeper meaning when there isn’t one. There are thousands of videos with snakes in them, maybe some are symbolizing the devil, but I guarantee the majority of them are not.

You are too far gone. I hope you can see through the wool one day or at least do some research, Peace out ~

Research? Like the “research” you did by watching a few YouTube videos? You are the one that’s too far gone my friend. I hope one day you can get back in touch with reality and quit reinforcing your delusions with crazy internet theories created from pure speculation and no factually evidence.

You are SO brainwashed it's laughable.

You’ve brain washed yourself by eating up every conspiracy theory you read buddy. People over at r/insanepeoplefacebook found your delusions laughable actually. But I guess we’re all just brainwashed sheep and you’re an all-knowing 14 year old YouTube conspiracy theorist with all of this speculated “evidence” to prove us wrong so what do we know.

Seriously though, support conspiracy theories that actually have hard evidence, not loosely formed theories that are so far fetched you’d get thrown into a mental institution just for talking about it with family or in public. Supporting theories that are concocted from merely symbols and speculation is a dark road you don’t want to go down. It’ll leave you questioning every aspect of reality and destroy any sliver of sanity you still have left. Supporting those theories serves you no benefit other than giving yourself a sense of superiority and it’s just not healthy.

Didn't read your paragraph because i don't care :) PLEASE, continue typing things i won't read :)

And that right there proves to me you’re too immature to rationalize the theories you eat up

Totally :)

Lol you actually are a 14 year old girl aren’t you?

Totally dude ~ I'm playing Nintendogs RIGHT NOW! With my micky mouse silly bands jamming Jesse McCartney ~ Dis is da liiifffeee. lol

I've been using rumble more and more. Shame so few people have heard about it. Also I'm actually making money from a small channel on there after YouTube demonitized all channels under 1k subs

Funny this post was brought up... just yesterday I was on VICE’s YouTube page and watched the special they had on crisis actors and talking about a majority of the recent school and church shootings. Some very interesting stuff!

https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/89lx7v/youtube_shooter_identified_as_user_nasim_aghdam/dwso6ip/

Amen brother

I haven't read through their Terms of Service. Since YouTube is a private company it would strike me as odd that they would be under any obligation to guarantee that you could find anything you want using whatever search terms you deem appropriate.

I'm an old guy, so I guess I don't understand all of this completely. If I go to a grocery store to find "Sugar Fruit Crunch" and find that they don't carry "Sugar Fruit Crunch", I feel no compulsion to go on the internet and bitch about how my grocery store is conspiring to deny people access to "Sugar Fruit Crunch". I tell the manager. And if he tells me to "go pound sand" my only recourse is to shop elsewhere. That store is a private enterprise and can sell what they please.

Last I checked, YouTube is a private enterprise as well. They allow what they allow and provide an interface that gives you access to whatever they make available.

Personally... I'm glad that people have posted videos on how to lay engineered hardwood flooring and tile a bathroom shower. Saved me thousands.

It strikes me that there is a generation out there that expects that everything they want should be available instantly to them online. And if it isn't, then it is because of some grand conspiracy against them.

YouTube owes you nothing. And I'm just guessing that they probably don't give a rip whether you are able to find "flat earth/David Hogg/Fake Moon Landing" videos that satisfy your need for instant gratification or not.

OK... help me out.

You are looking for a couple old videos that conclusively proved that MSM used the same people under different names for different tragedies. And you couldn't find them using a variety of search methods.

Do you know for a fact that they exist? If so... how do you know this?

Because they used to be there, but they aren't any longer.

It is possible that they were deleted by the authors (or taken down for other reasons by youtube).

It is also possible that youtube is manipulating search results to hide things that don't fit the narrative. In this case, it appears that certain subjects that are conservative are hidden, while an alternative viewpoint is put to the top of the list. Twitter was just caught red-handed doing this, so it does happen.

Yeah I noticed they started heavily censoring terms (I think) around the end of last year. And they keep adding more

please backup some or go make a transcript and share it!

Yeah I'm backing up all I can. Hopefully others will too.

Searching google for that first quoted phrase, there aren't videos but there are images. Archived: http://archive.is/yeKLU

Are any of those screenshots of what you're seeking? Looks like archive.is only captured the first two pages of results.

Here's another result, searching on qwant.com (search engine recommended by Oliver Stone in recent interview with Jimmy Dore) -- https://www.disclose.tv/search?q=crisis+actors -- looks more interesting for results.

Censorship has gotten worse in the "google controlled" places, but that's to be expected.

OMG The Vigilant Citizen talks about exactly that! Here's the article:

https://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/youtube-will-fight-conspiracy-videos-using-wikipedia/

There will now always be a debunking video with every conspiracy one.

I tried your search request and most of it was just right-wing talking heads making far-reaching claims, with a smattering of debunked videos.

The most alarming thing here is that:

1. You are calling anything that you don't agree with part of an "agenda" and "MSM", etc.
2. You are searching based on confirmation bias.
3. You point out censorship and agenda peddling with zero substantiated proof.
4. You are calling it an echo-chamber while posting in an echo-chamber.

Steemit and dtube

I creates a playlist a few years ago and put there ”risky” videos of conspiracies, crisis actors and fake shootings. Now i checked the list and 80% videos were ’deleted’. This is very alarming im my mind.

1. Understand of censorship mechanics works
2. Pick some servers in a non-regulated country
3. Choose some rules and moderators
4. Reupload there all the media that has been deleted from public sites and the media suscepible to be deleted.

But first at all, i don,t know if saying this is llegal... humm,.... we need a fucking decent active very well formed secret community. idfc if saying this is illegal, reddit ban me.

Can you NOW spend 5 minutes bookmarking a YT-download/backup site? Can you NOW change your habits to copy-paste crucial information or write and save transcripts to your own local disks?

It's completely useless to just react with a "F*** Youtube". You are not served by that reaction, and neither am I.

Colour me shocked!

also easier to hide your money when operating at a loss!

Interviews done on the day of an incident are also not good source material. Nobody is sure what happened yet, everyone has a theory, confusion and fog of war reigns. Reporters are desperate to grab headlines and ratings, so they'll grab a hold of whatever they can find that seems juicy and try to sell it.

I see. You don't understand Newton. Newton's Laws are physics, not engineering.

Action and reaction talks about what forces are applied. They do not apply is the strength of the material becomes involved, such as a segment of a building collapsing.

Newton has nothing to do with this.

A "hammer" is the wrong analogy. A hammer delivers the same force every time it is swung. In the case of a collapsing building, the force is increasing every time the weight of a new floor is added. Hammers do not get heavier each time they strike.

I am a real engineer.

Newton's laws are of motion. They say absolutely nothing about whether a smaller object can "crush" a larger object. The ability for one object to crush another depends heavily on the material properties of the object. Newton's laws are about motion.

Newton's third law does not even apply here, let alone declare this to be "impossible".

Okay.... I think whomever wrote that is making an assumption that all of the debris is cleanly ejected out the sides of the building. That would change things.

But that's not what happened. The 10th floor of the building is not going to survive when the 90 floors above get crumbled into rubble and drop on it.

At no point is a "smaller" object hitting a "bigger" object.

Back to the analogy: Take out the 90th floor. You now have 10 floors landing on one floor, then 89th. It collapses.

Now you have 11 floors landing on the 88th. It collapses.

Now 12 land on the 87th. It collapses.

Another way to look at it: Chop off floors 100 thru 88 and put them on the ground as a 12 story building. Slag the 2nd floor. It, plus the top 10, crush the first floor.

Reset to an intact building and add another floor. Take out the same one. 11 floors crush one, then 12 floors crush the new 1st floor.

I'm a fan of the 3-pound sledge.