Thanks for this.

Thanks for this Todd!

Mega made a note on how George HW will be taken out soon. A few months later: Barbara Bush passes away and HW looks like he's on he's about to pass on. Obviously these two are very old so it could be a coincidence -- but still +1 for Mega

I feel like we should create a running tab of things that Mega accurately predicted and things that have yet to turn out to be true (ankle bracelets, voter fraud)

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/27/house-report-backs-claim-that-fbi-agents-did-not-think-flynn-lied-despite-guilty-plea.html

Here’s your Flynn

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-05-04/judge-mulls-dismissal-manafort-charges-concerned-mueller-overreach

This looks like the ace in the hole for Flynn perhaps.

Looks to me like he will walk, and he’s certainly causing substantial damage to the bad guys on his way to walking.

Exactly what Meg told us.

You're alive! Thanks for this work! Good job.

awesome! Thank you for all of this. I am still hoping one day sooner than later she will be back... Great Work! much appreciated!

I’ve been watching for the Roy Moore stuff too, and I’ve seen several articles recently that are starting to set the stage for Democrat election fraud so I’m curious to see how that plays out.

Lots happening!

He's suing three of the accusers - we'll see what happens.

I've been reading through the archive again and the comments about Mega being targeted by Share Blue Media (Anonymous ID:j6zPxoMH Sat 06 Jan 2018). Have there been any mentions of these Soros/Brock people anywhere else?

So you think she chose to exit in that manner for reasons of her own? I thought that maybe some Share Blue person had hacked her email and posted that nonsense. Do you have any thoughts on why those last posts were the way they were?

While I am only speculating.....

She shared what she needed to, maybe a bit to early, and probably got busted.

She threw up some subterfuge to exit, done.

Thanks Meg while you lasted......

Looks like Manafort might get off, just like Mega said!

Here's an online researcher destroying Q anon: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tOr2MQAl5c4

Here is a Q anon whistleblower: https://steemit.com/qanon/@lifttheveil411/qanon-whistleblower-cbts-4chan-8chan-qanon-baker-here-to-set-the-record-straight

There is a ton of money being made by Q and being fronted for Q apps and the like. Mega had said that Q was 4 staffers being funded by Antifa (Soros). I am beginning to think she was absolutely right.

Thread about Mega, not Q

Mega had plenty to say about Q. Read it.

They also completely changed their tune on Q right before going AWOL. Q isn't profiting off of anyone. Only losers begging for subrscribers on YouTube while presenting their own false narrative are the ones attempting to profit.

It seems that your comment contains 1 or more links that are hard to tap for mobile users. I will extend those so they're easier for our sausage fingers to click!

Here is link number 1 - Previous text "CNN"

^{Please PM /u/eganwall with issues or feedback! | Delete}

Mega always said Bannon was always loyal to Trump.

IMHO it’s all unfolding as Meg said, just on a very different time table. I think the time table is fungible based on political strength. There has been a clear correlation between Trump’s rising popularity and the intensity of the ‘storm’.

I don't know if anyone hears is following EyeTheSpy but this was today's post re: Mega.

https://mobile.twitter.com/o1o22o1o/status/1002674752308166656

I'm interested to know if anyone had considered this before.

I am still trying to absorb his response about Mega. Disappointed and yet made sense how she just vanished. As for your question, my answer is no. I didn't consider her a CIA plant. I'm not 100% sure of ETS either. But his responses are enlightening. We will see what happens on 06/11/18.

I was thinking that as well, TW. Is it possible that Q was posting earlier than he was picked up and followed? In other words....did Q actually appear earlier but the Q Anon boards didn't collect those 4/8 chan posts? I don't know how to search the chans so I am not sure if it would have been possible or whether even if it was, that Q's post would have simply been ignored or disregarded. Until the Huma/Podesta arrests posts came out, I don't think anyone was really paying much attention to anyone by name other than Mega and the FBIanon guy, right?

I read some of the FBI anon stuff. I was impressed with what info came from that. Maybe the FBI anon guy was the prelude to Q becoming more prominent...sort of a "test run" for the Q team.

Maybe ets is implying that while time travel is not possible, Megs has the exclusive capability......😄

I haven’t followed ets myself but some of my more trusted commentators that I follow have indicated I’m not missing anything. If this is his take on Megs than his posts are worthless.

I agree of course. I am hoping though he's just getting her mixed up with someone else. It's amusing to me that they (Mega, Q, ETS) seem to agree on almost everything, all the important stuff anyway. Maybe differences in time table, but to me it kind of seems like they're all on the same side. And in ETS's case, he even eludes that Q is Assange. So doesn't it make them crappy controlled opposition if they basically all agree?

Btw my opinion on Assange in particular is I don't find it that far-fetched about him possibly being a member of the Q team (along with military intelligence, possibly Trump, etc). Or that Mega would get, for lack of a better phrase, "girly excited" about discovering his part in it, especially if they were friends and not allowed to be in contact or something. I get the same way when I'm emotional, a personality thing I think. For instance, you guys should've seen my texts and emails after being reunited years later with a beloved pet I never thought I'd see again, with yeah, lots of freaking out from disbelief, !'s and caps. I think it was that kind of situation.

Then, when everyone flipped out about it, I think it was too hard for her to come back and know how to explain. I think she just took it as a cue from circumstances that it was time to leave. Just my theory anyway. I have a hard time believing that she's dead or even less that she was CIA. And yes, we should find out how valid ETS really is in just a week anyway.

Valid points. I completely believe we'll see she was right. Also, interesting read that I haven't seen before. Thanks.

Read on GA that this EyeTheSpy was not real trustworthy with info. I think even 8ch has mentioned that he/she is a disinfo agent. So...take it as you will. Just passing info I've read fwd. Been a very long time since I've checked in here. Glad I did.

Definitely disinfo. Thankfully he wasn't very bright because that was able to be confirmed on the 11th. Q on the other hand seems to be getting confirmed by Trump himself at rallies, super interesting

I do think the Q being Assange thing has merit. Timing of extraction from embassy (Mega), start of posting, going dark, potential deal for freedom reached for help draining swamp. Hence we see an alternative forum for dropping information. WikiLeaks has been comped. Just makes sense, doing this at the instruction of the administration. Plus, who would have or be provided with access to everything? I think Assange and friends are working for administration to drain corruption worldwide. So, if Q isn't a larp, there is an idea. I never believed Mega was a larp and she did call it on her last posts.

I was following the EyeTheSpy twitter feed on the day he said this about MegaAnon. He blocked me for challenging his explanation quoted above. I mentioned MegaAnon had been posting on 4 Chan for years, and then her posts became more frequent during the discussions about Kim Dotcom in May of 2017. She was around way before the Q movement began. EyeTheSpy is a total fraud.

Have you ever seen any screen capped proofs of early megs chan posts? It's almost like we need an encyqlopedia site of our own for this thing.

EyeTheSpy is damage control, in my opinion. That he even posts about Mega makes me hope that she's just fine, because he's put a lot of disinfo out. He claims fluoride is just fine in water, vaccines are mostly good, aliens exist but have never interacted with us (yeah, right), time travel is not possible, no weather modification--impossible, no portals, and on and on. He's a distraction. Trying to steal Q's base while Q's not posting, preparing for the storm about to hit, according to this reddit article: https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/duplicates/8nmorx/trump_is_about_to_take_them_down_but_wait_is_this/

While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Anyone can post anything, of course, but almost nothing of what you highlighted above as disinfo matches his responses. But whatever. I'm just for us all being accurate and truthful and looking for other's opinions of whether they'd considered what ETS was suggesting. TW's timeline for example is ACCURATE. I can consider that as an excellent counter. To suggest that the guy (ETS) said flouride was fine in water ( when he did NOT ) eliminates your opinion from my consideration. But that's me.

Ah, well it was someone in one of my FB groups who said EtS said that fluoride was okay in water, but I did not cross-verify that. It takes hours to go through his posts, as it is. I screenshot a lot of them, and then realized it didn't resonate with me and deleted all of them. I specifically remember him saying that aliens existed but did not interact with us, and that vaccines were "not all bad," that time was linear and therefore impossible, that we didn't have bases on Mars... but whatever. If ONE thing I posted was inaccurate in your view of what I said of him, then by the same token, HIS opinion doesn't count to me because he's posted multiple things I believe to be false. I'm not digging through his channel anymore to prove he said that about fluoride but I'll take your word for it that the FB poster got that one wrong.

ETS did not claim that fluoride was okay in water. SMH with the spreading of disinfo. Again, I don't know how legit he is. But even Q wrote something like "what is up is down, what is left is right". Perhaps on 06/11/18 we will indeed have a great awakening.

As for his response about MegaAnon, well.. I hope she gives a shout out when she is able to. And yes, I still re-read the posts gathered by TW. Thanks again Todd.

Thanks, Todd! I have amended my original post to take out the bit about fluoride. I will go back to that FB post where I saw it and say that I've now heard from two sources that it is a false claim, unless he could provide a screenshot. That would be a smoking gun, if he had posted it.

I miss Mega, and I hope she's okay. David Wilcock said he thought she was okay, just laying low. I hope so. I loved how she laid things right out in an easy to understand way, but I understand now why Q did things so cryptically, if Q IS Military Intelligence.

And I went back to the FB page and asked anyone if they caught a screenshot of it, and while some remembered seeing it, they haven't been able to find a screenshot yet, but someone else explained that EyeTheSpy has been sanitizing posts--she said her question had been answered about something, and then both her question and his answer got deleted, so they are doing some sanitizing on posts. I'm not sure what to think of Bill Smith yet, but he shows in this video an instance of this "sanitizing" going on, for he posted a video about EtS, who, 5 minutes after the video was posted, issued a response, which he then deleted (I think that was about 5 minutes in--Bill does whinge on a bit). www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kv3k3h7EkU&feature=youtu.be

My 2 cents: All of these people, MegaAnon, FBIAnon, QAnon, EyeTheSpy--they are all pushing the same ballpark agenda: Clinton is Dirty. There is a Deep State. A push to drain the swamp. Not ONE of them has said "Actually, Clinton's not so bad. It's all a misunderstanding." So, as far as details are concerned, maybe some of it is disinfo, bullshit, erroneous. Does it matter? The truth is the DAMAGE is done for the loss of our societal innocence. Public awareness is piqued. People are paying attention and not trusting the mainstream message & propaganda. The evisceration of the Swamp is happening. What I am TERRIFIED of, is what happens after? After we are traumatized by all this, it will leave an emotionally drained and suffered society. What fills that vacuum? It could be WORSE. Think "Game of Thrones" or "Mockingjay" we will be weak, and easily trust anyone who promises to be on the righteous path. Maybe this is conspiracy overload... but it's not unrealistic.

Todd...have a look at Tracy Beanz video https://youtu.be/z9_sX1NxCPM where the tiles look suspiciously identical to a certain someones famous tile pics.

So you don't think the exact same tiles in the video are a flag? I mean, if she was LARPing...she would definitely try to use a different persona...that's my guess anyways. I think the whole thing is a little fishy. I wish it were true...I really do..but I have to look at the evidence. Someone who is into every single conspiracy theory and does video after video about Q and all the rest of IC leaks just happens to have the exact same tiles as the one and only Mega Anon...

http://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/394036-How-Comey-intervened-to-kill-Wikileaks-immunity-deal

Wonder if this is what mega was referring to when she said assange had a date when he could drop certain things. But since the deal was blocked by comey the drops never happened

I hope assange is free from the embassy as megs said.....

Megs alluded to Strozk being a sheepdipped spook, and that his public persona at FBI was just a cover. According to this, she was correct (again).

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/bombshell-peter-strzok-was-cia-and-fbi-at-the-same-time/

Looking like another accurate call from Megs. Really interested to see how this Assange saga turns out over the next few weeks.

FBI CIA FED - https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/20/trump-poised-to-take-control-of-the-federal-reserve.html

In that order

Who is HLIanon? Seems there are many nowadays. Is it worth checking or another eyespy or ranon?

I’ll need to read this if it’s about a space elevator. My colleagues at work laughed at me when I proposed such with regard to an ‘infrastructure plan’. My take is the reason investment in roads/rail/ports paid off so well is because they made brand new connections. An infrastructure plan that focused on more/repaired of the same stuff would have only marginal impact. Folks were throwing around $1 trillion plans to essentially repave roads, I said we should use such a large investment to build a space elevator to make a new connection with ‘space’.

Well it looks like I have some reading to do :) Wasn't aware of HLIanon. Thanks for the link, Todd.

makes me think that DJT is Three. sort of like Asimov's 2nd Foundation

HLI saying they would seize the apparatus in 2024 - makes no sense. you either quietly take action in 2024 or you announce you will do it in the future, but you do it today.

2nd Foundation (spoiler alert) was what i thought of when HLI described three. Sci-fi story, galactic empire fell. 2nd foundation was announced 1000 years in advance IIRC to aid in coming out of the galactic dark ages, but they were always there from the start, working quietly behind the scenes.

not familiar with plus ultra

Have you seen the announcement that President Trump will be sending a test message through the wireless emergency broadcast system? Sounds familiar.

Thanks for maintaining this, by the way. I was disappointed in how many things didn't happen the way Meg predicted or as quickly as she thought, and I think she made some educated guesses on matters outside her field that didn't pay off. But it's good to come back here once in a while and see how much things are generally proceding in the directions she talked about.

It does sound plausible, but everything kinda has to, if we accept that the good guys need to spread disinformation too.

In any case, it's starting to feel like things are moving faster again, after slowing down for most of this year.

todd-- mega may be back!!!

I'm not convinced it's her, but you might want to see for yourself: https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/187985678/#q187985678

Why do you think so? Seems like her. She apparently posted on Sept 30 as well basically confirming that dropped an analysis I never thought of, said that fbi investigation would show nothing, Kavanaugh would be confirmed, that Dianne f is screwed, and showed a pic on ford's polygraph that i never saw before. a lot of tell tale signs of mega.

In Lord_Mhoram's post, he links to a 4chan thread. The user with the ID of '1E/yXWjy' definitely appears to be Mega in large part because:

• Distinctive voice
• Predictions which seem to be coming true
• Just a way of looking at the situation that is distinct and like her

There was another post by this same person on Sept 30 FYI

curious: why do you think that's not her? the main warning sign is that photo she dropped of her feet was already seen before.

Not to sound dramatic, Mega by far was one of the most eye-opening writers I have ever read.

I have research politics, history, news etc for years...yet, when she posted, she just said things that were just so clear and mind opening in the matter of a few paragraphs. She clarified things to where I now have significant confidence in what I think (whereas before I would get into significant analysis paralysis).

I think it's mega. Maybe its because I want to believe.

What Sept 30 post do you mean, and how do you know it was the same person?

Could be. She wasn't doing any of her y'all/brah stuff, but that could have been trying to keep a lower profile. The usual LARP-hunters got pretty worked up as it is. I haven't seen anything of her since, real or fake. She didn't try to give any explanation of where she's been all this time, which is where she'd have to start to get any credibility.

It does sound plausible, but everything kinda has to, if we accept that the good guys need to spread disinformation too.

In any case, it's starting to feel like things are moving faster again, after slowing down for most of this year.

todd-- mega may be back!!!