No, you flat earthers are always asking for proof, then ignore it.. Not one single flat earther has posted proof that doesn't come from a YouTube video..
I've done the research, there aren't any sources with any proof, so please, enlighten me..
This is a forum, I'm asking you a question.. If you believe in something, there must be something you can share that could be used to enlighten the rest of us? I'm genuinely interested in finding out why people believe we live on a flat earth..
You're not generally interested by looking at your history you do this a lot and I'm not interested in changing your mind. Believe what you want. It's your choice.
Hey there! Im actually kinda curious on what draws you to think the earth is flat. I guess i bieleve its a globe but have always been skeptical. I try not to bieleve everything I see on tv..
I never asked for your respect.. You are a very angry person, and I don't understand why? Does lashing out at strangers on the internet make you feel better?
You're so ignorant.. I have researched, I say this quite frequently, but you people just ignore that and call us dumb for wanting something to substantiate this claim..
I would like some proof, and therein lies the problem..
Attacking and trying to shirt stir as always. My top comment already foreshadowed your tactics young man. I’m here to encourage free discussion on all topics.
I'm trying to discuss, you don't bring up any valid points.. I can only go by what you give me.. If asking for proof is some kind of tactic, I can obviously see this isn't going anywhere.. Beat your chest all you want, it doesn't change the fact that you've presented no truth, and no discussion.. You're obviously very insecure about yourself and no amount of projecting will help you..
I'm with you bro. Globalists... globalism... scientism It becomes so clear they are a cult and want us to believe whatever they tell us. All part of putting us in a metaphorical box. We've got to think outside that box and the fake paradigm they've created.
We live on a beautiful plane of existence and we don't need to believe in the fantasy that is finding a planet and abandon this world. Say no to NASA/Space X CGI propaganda.
The coordinated attempt by corrupt elements of the US/UK national police, intelligence and propaganda apparatus to overturn the outcome of the 2016 US presidential election.
The Jews are the problem. It’s not the Zionists. It’s not the Rothschilds. It’s not the banks and the media. It’s not the war machine. Nope. It’s the Jews. Not just the rich ones either, but the whole tribe.
Depends on the person opasite you and their level of cognitive dissonance. Some people find climate change hoax controversial as if you're just hoping the world will burn. Science oriented people will disagree with moon landing hoaxes.
In this sub, anything dismissing globe earth is very unpopular, hollow earth is ridiculed and the Gnostic idea that we are living in a false reality is also quite controversial.
Time is more than just a human invention. Sure, minutes and hours are made up measurements, but just like feet and inches, they measure a very real thing. Time can pass at different rates depending on how fast you are moving or how much gravity you are under, so depending on your definition of time travel, it could be said that its already proven to be possible. Travelling backwards, however, has no evidence of being possible currently.
No evidence of being impossible either, physics equations work fine in either direction. The whole idea of entropy is to explain the arrow of time as we see it but really can you measure entropy?
This seems more and more likely each day. It would actually be nice to have proof of this. Because then death isn't death but just turning off a computer.
Wouldn't that be evidence against it? If future AI enhanced transhumans are capable of building such things it seems like they'd be able to control the memories of the simulations and prevent this
Well this is where it comes into speculation. I don’t see it as our future selves or anything like that. In fact strangely enough it makes the bible make more sense. I’ve never been a bible bashed let’s get that clear. But from what I’ve seen I really do think the earth was made for mankind by god. It’s just what you believe god to be. Like an entity or like we are all part of god. Our real selves exist on the other side and we are having a human experience. It’s really open to interpretation. But let’s just say it took me down that road and I’m not religious.
Interesting, but I was just responding to the idea that the Mandela effect was evidence of a simulation. I wasn't saying anything about simulation theory itself
It depends on the purpose of the simulation. What small piece of history can we change to see if the inhabitants of the simulation notice, and how they react, sounds like a fascinating experiment to me.
I meant deliberately leaving the memories in tact, but changing all physical evidence to point to something else. It's be fascinating to see how people rationalise that change and try to explain their (seemingly) false yet consistent memories, and if the simulation was run by a dystopic entity it'd be potentially useful to them in seeing how far they can rewrite their own history.
Because in the real world, you can change physical evidence (records of the event, remnants left behind) but you CAN'T change the memories of people who have already read about it or were witnesses to the event. Modeling the extents you have to go to to make the new history be accepted as fact, and how people respond to the contradictory information, is potentially useful.
But if you have the tech to run accurate society-level simulations wouldn't you probably have had some kind of mind control tech long before that? The ability to run a simulation at that scale is pretty damn far out
I'm from the UK and I think the ramifications of that are unbelievable. But that's why it'd be completely effective if it were indeed orchestrated. Brilliant if so.
The Kardashians are faking their pregnancies, ala Beyonce. Most celebs are drug addicts, and their handlers/record labels like them that way (easier to control, convenient excuse if they need to get rid of them later). Your television is more toxic than most people will ever be able to understand.
I have two, that may not be controversial per say, but I do find them kinda hard to articulate accurately and they are relatively recent, so allow me to explain.
First, as more and more time passes I’m slowly coming to the opinion that Bernie Sanders’ 2016 primary election was a DNC psyop. I was in college at the time and a big Bernie supporter during the primary and saw first hand how popular he was around colleges. As well it was obvious at the time that the DNC was fixing the primary against him. I could understand at the time why he didn’t make a big deal about it at the time and ultimately capitulated to Hillary because he didn’t want to be a scapegoat for a possibly (and as we know how definite) Trump victory a la Ralph Nader in 2000. But since then it seems he’s completely just became a doormat and agrees with the Democratic Party instead of trying to creat a real and different political movement which is a desperate sentiment of the National attitude. Lastly there are details of his campaign that don’t feel right in retrospect, first there are specific emails where Hillary staffers scold Bernie for bringing up specific topics and mention “not being part of the deal”, his meeting with Obama early on the race, what did they talk about, was he getting instructions, Bernie’s whole “enough about the emails” statement which was a huge service to Hillary. To me it seemed the DNC used Bernie to galvanize the youth vote and then shift that over to Hillary after Bernie’s lost (from personal experience it always bothered me how people who had voraciously supported Bernie during the primary immediately shifted to adoring Hillary a mere few months later, especially when she represented many of things Bernie had criticized) as well any holdouts to Bernie could be lambasted as “Bernie bros” and this bullied into supporting Hillary and more importantly not criticizing her.
My second theory is about Richard Spencer. Something about this guy has never sat right with me. First let me state emphatically that I am disgusted by racism, antisemitism, white nationalism (or any extreme nationalism for that manner) the kkk, etc. and I do think there has been an increase in these movements in the past few years especially in the context of the alt-right. But when it comes to Richard Spencer, the supposed leader of the alt-right, it always seems as though the media is right behind him getting footage of what he’s doing. In my opinion at worst he’s a CIA plant or at best the media has agreed to give him an undeserved platform. Doing so allows the media to focus on the alt-right and it’s brand of antisemitism and racism. They then can take the term “alt-right” and slap it on anyone who criticizes the neoliberal/neoconservative order. (I’ll give a personal example. About a year ago, early summer 2017, I started getting Jordan Peterson recommendations from YouTube, I watched a couple out of pure interest and I found them really boring and tedious, just generic self-help stuff to be honest. So months later I start noticing Peterson in the media and everywhere it always puts him in context of being “a leader or leading figure in the alt-right” so natural I dismissed him as a Richard Spencer like academic. It wouldn’t be until I read about the horrible Cathy Newman interview in The Atlantic, surprisingly if all places, and then revisited Peterson’s videos on YouTube to find that he wasn’t this alt-right figure, I didn’t become a fan of his as many others have but I don’t think he’s a monster like the media make him to be. Since then I’ve personally had to revise how the media uses the term”alt-right” to dismiss people who have differing opinions)
Spencer, totally agree. Bernie.. I don't think a guy who has been independent on his own for decades would do this.
Also, Bernie wasn't good for Hillary in the 2016 primary. If he was part of the plan how come she wouldn't even say his name for so long? Why we're all the DNC debates scheduled during college football games? According to your theory they would want him front and center for all to hear, but it didn't go that way. Don't see it..
I honestly think Richard is just a nationalist, but because of that he is automatically labeled as a "neo-Nazi", "racist", "xenophobic" (all of those words were on his Wikipedia page for months, might still be on there), without any research into his actual views. He doesn't seem like a racist - he does ask important questions about race and ethnicity, but not in a bad way (imo).
, as more and more time passes I’m slowly coming to the opinion that Bernie Sanders’ 2016 primary election was a DNC psyop
It was a pressure release valve. The Republicans tried to use Ron Paul to the same end, but his 2008 popularity snuck up on them. It was relatively uncharted territory. Not so much a decade later though.
I truly don’t care to go into detail about why I feel. I’ve read many of books that have touched on the topic, but Children of the Matrix was more in-depth. Read the book if you’d like to know more details that I can’t readily recite for you to understand me.
The bullshit story goes white people are aliens and Asians are part white unless you like them in which case they're now black. Or brown skinned, or whatever.
Aliens came to earth and were already genetically compatible? Do we even have any precedence for inter-species reproductive compatibility like that? No offense, but I'm assuming you haven't ever studied genetics...
It's definitely not a new idea, it's very reminiscent of the Aryan conspiracy theories that the Nazis had, and I'm just wondering what evidence made you consider it
And it’s not empirical data, but I believe caucasians sought refugee on Earth and enslaved its people. Also, ancient Egyptian pictures depict the people as light brown to dark with black hair. From what I’ve seen, there weren’t many representations of those with White skin, if any. Caucasians can’t bare The Sun as do people with darker skin. According to evolution, you would think they would have adapted to the natural climate of this planet after many years.
Evolution selects out punishes traits that affect your odds of reproducing. The degree to which we get affected by the sun doesn't really change our chances of reproducing. Also even if there are differences in skin cancer rates, I would guess that that usually shows up after people have already passed childbearing age
Evidence can possibly be in the form of O negative blood, which was quite common in Germany and pockets of Europe. O neg, is universal blood donor, villages Medieval Europe which were predominantly O neg, were resistant and at times totally immune to the bubonic plague. I know of a few very close people to me who are O neg. They are never sick. Never. And the weird thing about rh negative blood types (blood type lacking rhesus factor) is that the females cannot naturally reproduce with males of positive blood type. It's almost like they are in fact a different species. Without recent advances in medicine (namely rhogam shots) The women reject the fetus, much like the animal kingdom and species too far apart. An example maybe like mules and donkeys unable to further the genetic line.
Israel was the ones who hacked and leaked all the democrats stuff to Wikileaks and DCLeaks to kill JCPOA. Israel has said Iran is months away from nukes for 30 years and JCPOA makes it hard to carry out their fear power play to justify their illegal nukes and actions.
Some subsection of the elites of the world participate in ritual sexual abuse and murder of children.
Probably for the purpose of secret keeping and blackmail, i.e. if you want to be in the 'in-crowd' you are forced to participate in these acts in a way that make it 'impossible' for you to tell anyone about this without being personally ruined.
This allows the elite to induct new members, while everyone is kept in control by everyone else by their shared rituals.
There is probably also some who participate for 'religious' reasons, i.e. they are Luciferian and believe human sacrifice provides them with sustained power, wealth, and more time.
I watched a documentary last night that was I guess slightly similar to this. In Afghanistan all the higher ups in the police force and government have little boys who they keep on the police compounds and I quote " To fuck their asses at night,if they don't have the little boys, whose asses are they supposed to fuck? Their own grandmothers?" Also if the little boys try to escape they are shot or severely beaten, there have also been cases where kids have shot each other.
The Holocaust was a hoax. Yes, lots of Jews died; and so did lots of other people. But no, I don't believe the Germans were gassing thousands of Jews to death and burning mountains of corpses to ash. It's not even feasibly possible. And anyone looking at the evidence objectively should come to similar conclusions.
I’ve been so interested in this topic for a little while now. Can you explain to me what exactly is your view point and how you got to your conclusion? I’m genuinely not trolling, it’s an honest question
after noticing videos of Israeli soldats mistreating the Palestinians, esp. children posted on here and elsewhere EVERY DAMN DAY, I'm of the opinion that there is a concerted effort to tarnish their people.
think about it for a second. if the juice really run this bitch, that sort of thing would never get out, let alone be published every day.
That religion has been (for a long time) weaponized for psychological operations against US citizens to control their minds at the deepest levels, preventing people from accurately perceiving events while also encouraging and dissuading a range of behaviors and thoughts. Not a popular theory in many conspiracy circles.
The US and China are actively engaged in warfare in outer space. This is kept from the public because it involves the deployment of several closely guarded advanced technologies.
There's not a lot of info on this in the public domain, and I don't know of a single source that has compiled all the known evidence on this, but I'd point to some of the topics that I've researched that led me to this conclusion.
There's been a significant uptick in the frequency of unannounced military satellite launches carrying top secret payloads in recent years, and seemingly sudden interest from Trump in establishing a Space Force program. The X37-B program is also particularly interesting, along with DARPA's Falcon project, and China's Shelong space-craft.
The scarce details the government releases on space capabilities (communications, surveillance, recon, electromagnetism, kinetic weaponry, etc) are already very impressive - and given that the public's knowledge of secret tech lags far behind current capabilities, it's hard to imagine what can actually be done now.
The Outer Space Treaty prohibits placing WMD's in space or on other celestial bodies (like the Moon, or Mars) but leaves the door open for new types of weaponry - like kinetic bombardment. It also doesn't address weaponization or warfare between man-made platforms, like spacecraft or satellites.
Mine's almost an anti-conspiracy theory - many conspiracy theories are the result of people at the top not knowing well enough what they are doing, and making arbitrarily decisions that could look like they form a conspiracy, and they are happy for these theories to propagate as they project an air of influence/power.
(Note that this doesn't preclude conspiracies actually taking place -- NSA/GCHQ et al. is a well-founded example of how competency and conspiracy can overlap -- just that I feel many theories are asking for a degree of competency and foresight that probably isn't always there).
Kinda similar but I feel a certain strange pity for the elite, whomever you may consider them to be. I imagine that they must use powerful mind/thought control techniques, like what you hear about North Korean defectors being afraid of their dear leader being able to read their minds from hundreds of miles away. After going through a few prolonged bouts of existential paranoia myself I can understand how being afraid of seemingly inescapable threats can affect you.
One of my friends was a victim of satanic ritual abuse. He's shared with me how his abusers were also controlled by someone above them, a vicious ladder. Freaking dark
Demons are everywhere, and they grant supernatural powers to those who worship them, but no worldly gains are worth eternity burning in the Lake of Fire.
"Curse not the king, no not in thy thought; and curse not the rich in thy bedchamber: for a bird of the air shall carry the voice, and that which hath wings shall tell the matter." Ecclesiastes 10:20
Sure but they were testing how easy it was to mislead the people and how well they could be manipulated using the technology to carry out a simulation like this. It gave them an insight into how well Project Blue Beam would work.
What's the most unpopular/controversial conspiracy theory you believe?
Astrology is real, the elites know about it and use it in their daily lives. Egocentrism prevents people from realizing we're at the mercy of the Sun, which generates all life and 99% of energy in the Solar system. Why is then so difficult to believe other planets might be influencing life in some similar fashion, though with invisible sources of radiation and energy? It's impossible to get any kind of sensible debate on the matter.
That Saturn used to be in front of our sun! Also there were very advanced civilizations that recorded this but something happened that sunk Atlantis and pushed saturn away giving its rings. Supposedly the hexagon storm on it holds some power. I guess most information was lost in the great library of Alexandria but some scrolls have been found in tombs in Egypt and all over the world reporting this phenomenon.
Holocaust was blown way out of proportion to hide behind the evil of dropping 2 nukes on civilian targets. Hence the "bad guys vs good guys" official narrative.
While I do not subscribe to the FE theory, I do dabble in it as an exercise of how deep our reality could be controlled if there was an agenda at play that was the extreme long game.
In my somewhat limited research of the theory I have crossed the strain where the earth is taught to be round with the end game being that we would come to believe a universe so vast and so unimaginably large that it makes our minds incapable of believing someone or something created it. (Bear with me now)
WHAT IF the biblical story of the devil being cast out of heaven and given a period of time to get humans to stop believing in God were true? What a fucking genius plan that he (the devil) would take his millennia of time that he would be given to play this loooong game. Generations and generations of humans teaching their children that the universe is huge and so complex that there is no way that it could have been “created” it must have happened through hap and circumstance. Look at where we are now. There is a tangible shift in our generation and the next of disbelief in god.
It’s just something I find really interesting. It’s given me the mentality to never completely disregard any idea since we don’t really have concrete proof of a lot of things. I enjoy exploring theories no matter how “far fetched” some people might think.
Again, before the fucking villagers with the torches head up the mountain to burn the monster that is Flat Earth start in on me. I don’t believe the earth it flat because I have yet to come across any concrete tangible proof that I can test and see and perform experiments on my own to prove it to myself. That being said, I don’t have proof to that degree of the earth being round either.
The only one I can think of gives people pause when I mention it is "We are living in a simulated reality for the sole purpose of feeding negative energy to the Archons who control us and the illusion of reality"
The Bible is God's word, and contains the true history of the world. Also, Jesus Christ is God's only begotten son. The Bible is the most hated and censored book in the world. The Bible is banned in public schools around the world, and "progress" has long been defined in popular culture as moving away from God and biblical ethics.
Spencer, totally agree. Bernie.. I don't think a guy who has been independent on his own for decades would do this.
Also, Bernie wasn't good for Hillary in the 2016 primary. If he was part of the plan how come she wouldn't even say his name for so long? Why we're all the DNC debates scheduled during college football games? According to your theory they would want him front and center for all to hear, but it didn't go that way. Don't see it..
I'm trying to discuss, you don't bring up any valid points.. I can only go by what you give me.. If asking for proof is some kind of tactic, I can obviously see this isn't going anywhere.. Beat your chest all you want, it doesn't change the fact that you've presented no truth, and no discussion.. You're obviously very insecure about yourself and no amount of projecting will help you..
I honestly think Richard is just a nationalist, but because of that he is automatically labeled as a "neo-Nazi", "racist", "xenophobic" (all of those words were on his Wikipedia page for months, might still be on there), without any research into his actual views. He doesn't seem like a racist - he does ask important questions about race and ethnicity, but not in a bad way (imo).
The bullshit story goes white people are aliens and Asians are part white unless you like them in which case they're now black. Or brown skinned, or whatever.
The Outer Space Treaty prohibits placing WMD's in space or on other celestial bodies (like the Moon, or Mars) but leaves the door open for new types of weaponry - like kinetic bombardment. It also doesn't address weaponization or warfare between man-made platforms, like spacecraft or satellites.
And it’s not empirical data, but I believe caucasians sought refugee on Earth and enslaved its people. Also, ancient Egyptian pictures depict the people as light brown to dark with black hair. From what I’ve seen, there weren’t many representations of those with White skin, if any. Caucasians can’t bare The Sun as do people with darker skin. According to evolution, you would think they would have adapted to the natural climate of this planet after many years.
Evidence can possibly be in the form of O negative blood, which was quite common in Germany and pockets of Europe. O neg, is universal blood donor, villages Medieval Europe which were predominantly O neg, were resistant and at times totally immune to the bubonic plague. I know of a few very close people to me who are O neg. They are never sick. Never. And the weird thing about rh negative blood types (blood type lacking rhesus factor) is that the females cannot naturally reproduce with males of positive blood type. It's almost like they are in fact a different species. Without recent advances in medicine (namely rhogam shots) The women reject the fetus, much like the animal kingdom and species too far apart. An example maybe like mules and donkeys unable to further the genetic line.
Sure but they were testing how easy it was to mislead the people and how well they could be manipulated using the technology to carry out a simulation like this. It gave them an insight into how well Project Blue Beam would work.
, as more and more time passes I’m slowly coming to the opinion that Bernie Sanders’ 2016 primary election was a DNC psyop
It was a pressure release valve. The Republicans tried to use Ron Paul to the same end, but his 2008 popularity snuck up on them. It was relatively uncharted territory. Not so much a decade later though.
But if you have the tech to run accurate society-level simulations wouldn't you probably have had some kind of mind control tech long before that? The ability to run a simulation at that scale is pretty damn far out
176 comments
1 showrun 2018-05-06
we don't live on a globe
1 ewwwwwzipties 2018-05-06
Source?
1 showrun 2018-05-06
Do your own research
1 ewwwwwzipties 2018-05-06
No, you flat earthers are always asking for proof, then ignore it.. Not one single flat earther has posted proof that doesn't come from a YouTube video..
I've done the research, there aren't any sources with any proof, so please, enlighten me..
1 th3allyK4t 2018-05-06
He made his point. Do your own research and let people believe what they want. You are no one anyone needs to prove anything to
1 showrun 2018-05-06
Thank you. I dont remember asking anyone for a proof of anything . I answered OP's question.
1 ewwwwwzipties 2018-05-06
This is a forum, I'm asking you a question.. If you believe in something, there must be something you can share that could be used to enlighten the rest of us? I'm genuinely interested in finding out why people believe we live on a flat earth..
1 showrun 2018-05-06
You're not generally interested by looking at your history you do this a lot and I'm not interested in changing your mind. Believe what you want. It's your choice.
1 ewwwwwzipties 2018-05-06
Well thanks for nothing then, no one ever wants to prove flat earth.. Great theory there..
1 showrun 2018-05-06
Like I said I'm not interested in changing your mind. All the information you need is out there. I'm not your mommy.
1 Apryggen 2018-05-06
You sound scripted.
1 ewwwwwzipties 2018-05-06
The whole world is taking crazy pills.. I wish I could get paid for arguing with flat earthers, where can I sign up for that?
You look like someone in the know..
1 ericthemidget_ 2018-05-06
You sound triggered
1 xscrumpyx 2018-05-06
Hey there! Im actually kinda curious on what draws you to think the earth is flat. I guess i bieleve its a globe but have always been skeptical. I try not to bieleve everything I see on tv..
1 showrun 2018-05-06
Too many reasons I don't even know where to start. Start here if you're interested. The earth does not move. Michelson Morley experiment.
1 really_doesitmatter 2018-05-06
Show me your proof of a globe earth without reffering to 100% CGI NASA shit.
My opinion is it comes down to perception and I like to believe that it is flat. Outside, with my own two eyes, most stuff point to it being flat.
Plus, most of my other conspiracy theories ties in nicely to this.
1 48packet 2018-05-06
If you fly from the US to China and keep heading west, what happens?
1 really_doesitmatter 2018-05-06
Have you ever seen a flat earth map? Please study both theories, and I will gladly agrue with you.
1 666Evo 2018-05-06
Do you believe other planets are round or flat?
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-05-06
You'd just call any level of evidence fake...
1 really_doesitmatter 2018-05-06
Guess we will never know
1 ericthemidget_ 2018-05-06
Your comment history suggests you do this shit all day every day. Yuck.
1 ewwwwwzipties 2018-05-06
It's been a busy weekend for you as well bud.. Careful of that glass house...
1 ericthemidget_ 2018-05-06
Copy and paste my replies. All reasonable and encouraging open discussion little boy. Don’t know what the fuck your agenda is
1 ewwwwwzipties 2018-05-06
I haven't disrespected you once.. To be honest, you should learn to interact like an adult before you pretend to be one..
You're completely unreasonable and offer no substance to the conversation..
1 ericthemidget_ 2018-05-06
You get respect when you earn it son
1 ewwwwwzipties 2018-05-06
I never asked for your respect.. You are a very angry person, and I don't understand why? Does lashing out at strangers on the internet make you feel better?
1 ewwwwwzipties 2018-05-06
They made a statement, Im asking what would be the point of such a statement.. Thanks for your concern..
1 ericthemidget_ 2018-05-06
No one needs to give u shit, research yourself
1 ewwwwwzipties 2018-05-06
You're so ignorant.. I have researched, I say this quite frequently, but you people just ignore that and call us dumb for wanting something to substantiate this claim..
I would like some proof, and therein lies the problem..
1 ericthemidget_ 2018-05-06
You people?
Dumb?
Ignorant?
Attacking and trying to shirt stir as always. My top comment already foreshadowed your tactics young man. I’m here to encourage free discussion on all topics.
1 ewwwwwzipties 2018-05-06
I'm trying to discuss, you don't bring up any valid points.. I can only go by what you give me.. If asking for proof is some kind of tactic, I can obviously see this isn't going anywhere.. Beat your chest all you want, it doesn't change the fact that you've presented no truth, and no discussion.. You're obviously very insecure about yourself and no amount of projecting will help you..
Good luck
1 TotesMessenger 2018-05-06
I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:
If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)
1 purpledart 2018-05-06
Ack Ack.
1 ericthemidget_ 2018-05-06
I’m club fucking footed ya ass wipe!
1 ericthemidget_ 2018-05-06
Prepare for shills to attack this comment
theres no proof
It discredits REAL conspiracies
your probably believe in the tooth fairy
And so on and so on. It’s all too predictable.
1 showrun 2018-05-06
Yep.
Same taking points
1 ericthemidget_ 2018-05-06
Hey mods this guys telling me to kill myself over wanting to discuss FE? How the fuck is he not banned?
1 showrun 2018-05-06
No, I'm saying this is what they tell me when I state my beliefs. I'm not saying that to you.
1 ericthemidget_ 2018-05-06
Sorry about that buddy. You’re completely right.
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-05-06
I disagree with him but upvoted because it's a legit answer to the question
1 CovfefeAddictedMonky 2018-05-06
Everyone who disagrees with you is a shill paid by NASA who deserved to die
1 ericthemidget_ 2018-05-06
Die? Wtf a little extreme there buddy
1 CovfefeAddictedMonky 2018-05-06
it's called sarcasm
1 ericthemidget_ 2018-05-06
Is it? It’s not sarcasm when you and all the other assholes attack any free discussion.
1 CovfefeAddictedMonky 2018-05-06
U dumb
1 Ipaidformyaccount 2018-05-06
It's wise to not believe everything you can't validate yourself.
1 ericthemidget_ 2018-05-06
“It has to be real because it looks so fake”
1 showrun 2018-05-06
Lol. It's photoahop cuz... It it it has to be
1 Centuri0n- 2018-05-06
I'm with you bro. Globalists... globalism... scientism It becomes so clear they are a cult and want us to believe whatever they tell us. All part of putting us in a metaphorical box. We've got to think outside that box and the fake paradigm they've created.
We live on a beautiful plane of existence and we don't need to believe in the fantasy that is finding a planet and abandon this world. Say no to NASA/Space X CGI propaganda.
1 NapalmForNarratives 2018-05-06
The coordinated attempt by corrupt elements of the US/UK national police, intelligence and propaganda apparatus to overturn the outcome of the 2016 US presidential election.
1 dingdangow 2018-05-06
ZOG
1 really_doesitmatter 2018-05-06
Idk this conspiracy, what is this?
1 absolutedesignz 2018-05-06
"Deep State" by another less politically disguised name. It was what deep State is when only white supremacists believed in Deep State.
1 jared_wil 2018-05-06
The Jews are the problem. It’s not the Zionists. It’s not the Rothschilds. It’s not the banks and the media. It’s not the war machine. Nope. It’s the Jews. Not just the rich ones either, but the whole tribe.
1 CovfefeAddictedMonky 2018-05-06
Well god damn no chill
1 Omnixau 2018-05-06
Depends on the person opasite you and their level of cognitive dissonance. Some people find climate change hoax controversial as if you're just hoping the world will burn. Science oriented people will disagree with moon landing hoaxes.
1 48packet 2018-05-06
The govt doesn't give a shit about you and if you think either party is the "good one" you are a fucking tool.
1 BillNyeScienceLies 2018-05-06
What's unpopular about this?
1 48packet 2018-05-06
Go speak with your typical normal person and tell them elections don't matter and our government is run by criminals.
It's not something average people will even attempt to wrap their head around. They will say cray cray and walk away...
1 BillNyeScienceLies 2018-05-06
It's one of the most popular, least controversial topics among conspiracy enthusiasts.
1 48packet 2018-05-06
I thought op meant the general public.
1 BillNyeScienceLies 2018-05-06
The general public doesn't browse r/conspiracy
1 48packet 2018-05-06
Ok you win, lol.
1 NorthBlizzard 2018-05-06
Reddit only thinks both parties are the same if it's the left caught fucking up
1 Janoz 2018-05-06
Probably hard-core Gnosticism and some hollow earth mixed with anti-globe earth paradigm.
1 TXROADWARRIOR 2018-05-06
in the conspiracy realm are these unpopular or controversial though?
1 Janoz 2018-05-06
In this sub, anything dismissing globe earth is very unpopular, hollow earth is ridiculed and the Gnostic idea that we are living in a false reality is also quite controversial.
1 TXROADWARRIOR 2018-05-06
ah flat earth.
1 ikonikashes 2018-05-06
Time travel exists.
1 MalnourishedModem 2018-05-06
Time is something that humans created. The only “real” time is now. Therefore I don’t believe time travel can ever be possible
1 space_guy95 2018-05-06
Time is more than just a human invention. Sure, minutes and hours are made up measurements, but just like feet and inches, they measure a very real thing. Time can pass at different rates depending on how fast you are moving or how much gravity you are under, so depending on your definition of time travel, it could be said that its already proven to be possible. Travelling backwards, however, has no evidence of being possible currently.
1 666Evo 2018-05-06
This is the right answer. "Time is something that humans created" is an utterly ridiculous statement.
1 danielsaid 2018-05-06
No evidence of being impossible either, physics equations work fine in either direction. The whole idea of entropy is to explain the arrow of time as we see it but really can you measure entropy?
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-05-06
We are all time travelers! We travel at about sixty seconds per minute
1 HellsquidsIntl 2018-05-06
I was just thinking that tomorrow.
1 SmoothBus 2018-05-06
We live in a simulation
1 LEGALinSCCCA 2018-05-06
This seems more and more likely each day. It would actually be nice to have proof of this. Because then death isn't death but just turning off a computer.
1 th3allyK4t 2018-05-06
The mandella effect has shown me we almost certainly live in a simulation. Just not like we know something a little more than a computer.
1 LEGALinSCCCA 2018-05-06
Yeah for sure. The one that got me was "THE Home Depot". I would've bet all my money that it's always been "Home Depot". I think it switched recently.
1 th3allyK4t 2018-05-06
There are so many, the target logo and chic- fil-a (now chick-fil-a). Are other well known US brands that have ME related.
1 Rubywulf2 2018-05-06
Wait... Target logo?
1 th3allyK4t 2018-05-06
It’s changed back ffs. It has three circles now back to two like I originally remember. Staples logo is another popular one
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-05-06
Wouldn't that be evidence against it? If future AI enhanced transhumans are capable of building such things it seems like they'd be able to control the memories of the simulations and prevent this
1 th3allyK4t 2018-05-06
Well this is where it comes into speculation. I don’t see it as our future selves or anything like that. In fact strangely enough it makes the bible make more sense. I’ve never been a bible bashed let’s get that clear. But from what I’ve seen I really do think the earth was made for mankind by god. It’s just what you believe god to be. Like an entity or like we are all part of god. Our real selves exist on the other side and we are having a human experience. It’s really open to interpretation. But let’s just say it took me down that road and I’m not religious.
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-05-06
Interesting, but I was just responding to the idea that the Mandela effect was evidence of a simulation. I wasn't saying anything about simulation theory itself
1 th3allyK4t 2018-05-06
Apologies .misread what you meant.
1 stordoff 2018-05-06
It depends on the purpose of the simulation. What small piece of history can we change to see if the inhabitants of the simulation notice, and how they react, sounds like a fascinating experiment to me.
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-05-06
But if you changed that piece of history and their memories didn't change, that's poor coding
1 stordoff 2018-05-06
I meant deliberately leaving the memories in tact, but changing all physical evidence to point to something else. It's be fascinating to see how people rationalise that change and try to explain their (seemingly) false yet consistent memories, and if the simulation was run by a dystopic entity it'd be potentially useful to them in seeing how far they can rewrite their own history.
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-05-06
But if you're trying to rewrite your own history then why would you care should leaving memories in tact?
1 stordoff 2018-05-06
Because in the real world, you can change physical evidence (records of the event, remnants left behind) but you CAN'T change the memories of people who have already read about it or were witnesses to the event. Modeling the extents you have to go to to make the new history be accepted as fact, and how people respond to the contradictory information, is potentially useful.
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-05-06
But if you have the tech to run accurate society-level simulations wouldn't you probably have had some kind of mind control tech long before that? The ability to run a simulation at that scale is pretty damn far out
1 Ronbomb 2018-05-06
Check out the the book called The Holographic Universe.
1 BatemaninAccounting 2018-05-06
That r/conspiracy has likely been taken over by crazy people and the alt-right.
1 odetowoe 2018-05-06
After looking at that showrun guy. I believe you.
1 _14611_ 2018-05-06
In the UK it takes a brave person to say the Lee Rigby killing may have just been theatre
1 systemerrorbeepbeep 2018-05-06
I'm from the UK and I think the ramifications of that are unbelievable. But that's why it'd be completely effective if it were indeed orchestrated. Brilliant if so.
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-05-06
Sort by controversial for real answers
1 tangled_night_sleep 2018-05-06
The Kardashians are faking their pregnancies, ala Beyonce. Most celebs are drug addicts, and their handlers/record labels like them that way (easier to control, convenient excuse if they need to get rid of them later). Your television is more toxic than most people will ever be able to understand.
1 Rambles64 2018-05-06
Why would they fake pregnancies? So they would be in the news?
1 avidadollars458 2018-05-06
I have two, that may not be controversial per say, but I do find them kinda hard to articulate accurately and they are relatively recent, so allow me to explain.
First, as more and more time passes I’m slowly coming to the opinion that Bernie Sanders’ 2016 primary election was a DNC psyop. I was in college at the time and a big Bernie supporter during the primary and saw first hand how popular he was around colleges. As well it was obvious at the time that the DNC was fixing the primary against him. I could understand at the time why he didn’t make a big deal about it at the time and ultimately capitulated to Hillary because he didn’t want to be a scapegoat for a possibly (and as we know how definite) Trump victory a la Ralph Nader in 2000. But since then it seems he’s completely just became a doormat and agrees with the Democratic Party instead of trying to creat a real and different political movement which is a desperate sentiment of the National attitude. Lastly there are details of his campaign that don’t feel right in retrospect, first there are specific emails where Hillary staffers scold Bernie for bringing up specific topics and mention “not being part of the deal”, his meeting with Obama early on the race, what did they talk about, was he getting instructions, Bernie’s whole “enough about the emails” statement which was a huge service to Hillary. To me it seemed the DNC used Bernie to galvanize the youth vote and then shift that over to Hillary after Bernie’s lost (from personal experience it always bothered me how people who had voraciously supported Bernie during the primary immediately shifted to adoring Hillary a mere few months later, especially when she represented many of things Bernie had criticized) as well any holdouts to Bernie could be lambasted as “Bernie bros” and this bullied into supporting Hillary and more importantly not criticizing her.
My second theory is about Richard Spencer. Something about this guy has never sat right with me. First let me state emphatically that I am disgusted by racism, antisemitism, white nationalism (or any extreme nationalism for that manner) the kkk, etc. and I do think there has been an increase in these movements in the past few years especially in the context of the alt-right. But when it comes to Richard Spencer, the supposed leader of the alt-right, it always seems as though the media is right behind him getting footage of what he’s doing. In my opinion at worst he’s a CIA plant or at best the media has agreed to give him an undeserved platform. Doing so allows the media to focus on the alt-right and it’s brand of antisemitism and racism. They then can take the term “alt-right” and slap it on anyone who criticizes the neoliberal/neoconservative order. (I’ll give a personal example. About a year ago, early summer 2017, I started getting Jordan Peterson recommendations from YouTube, I watched a couple out of pure interest and I found them really boring and tedious, just generic self-help stuff to be honest. So months later I start noticing Peterson in the media and everywhere it always puts him in context of being “a leader or leading figure in the alt-right” so natural I dismissed him as a Richard Spencer like academic. It wouldn’t be until I read about the horrible Cathy Newman interview in The Atlantic, surprisingly if all places, and then revisited Peterson’s videos on YouTube to find that he wasn’t this alt-right figure, I didn’t become a fan of his as many others have but I don’t think he’s a monster like the media make him to be. Since then I’ve personally had to revise how the media uses the term”alt-right” to dismiss people who have differing opinions)
1 48packet 2018-05-06
Spencer, totally agree. Bernie.. I don't think a guy who has been independent on his own for decades would do this.
Also, Bernie wasn't good for Hillary in the 2016 primary. If he was part of the plan how come she wouldn't even say his name for so long? Why we're all the DNC debates scheduled during college football games? According to your theory they would want him front and center for all to hear, but it didn't go that way. Don't see it..
1 snowingwords 2018-05-06
I honestly think Richard is just a nationalist, but because of that he is automatically labeled as a "neo-Nazi", "racist", "xenophobic" (all of those words were on his Wikipedia page for months, might still be on there), without any research into his actual views. He doesn't seem like a racist - he does ask important questions about race and ethnicity, but not in a bad way (imo).
1 YourHeadWillCollapse 2018-05-06
It was a pressure release valve. The Republicans tried to use Ron Paul to the same end, but his 2008 popularity snuck up on them. It was relatively uncharted territory. Not so much a decade later though.
1 supreme7god 2018-05-06
No offense to anyone, but I believe Caucasian people came from another planet and only brown people are native to earth.
1 DurtyLilPigBoi 2018-05-06
What about Asians?
1 supreme7god 2018-05-06
They are of the Earth. I believe earthlings all had brown-ish skin with natural black hair.
1 666Evo 2018-05-06
What evidence have you seen that makes you believe that?
1 supreme7god 2018-05-06
I read it in a conspiracy theory book in prison. I can’t recall the name at the moment; however, it was a very plausible hypothesis.
1 666Evo 2018-05-06
You read one book, which you can't remember the name of, and it has changed your opinion on the nature of humans?
Have you ever considered that you might be a little too suggestible and should do more research before forming opinions?
1 supreme7god 2018-05-06
I truly don’t care to go into detail about why I feel. I’ve read many of books that have touched on the topic, but Children of the Matrix was more in-depth. Read the book if you’d like to know more details that I can’t readily recite for you to understand me.
1 666Evo 2018-05-06
Did it have any evidence or was it simply a "plausible hypothesis"?
1 supreme7god 2018-05-06
I would say plausible hypothesis. But, he did provide evidence to support his theories.
1 CovfefeAddictedMonky 2018-05-06
The bullshit story goes white people are aliens and Asians are part white unless you like them in which case they're now black. Or brown skinned, or whatever.
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-05-06
Then why are we genetically the same species? Helluva coincidence
1 supreme7god 2018-05-06
From countless generations of breeding imo.
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-05-06
Aliens came to earth and were already genetically compatible? Do we even have any precedence for inter-species reproductive compatibility like that? No offense, but I'm assuming you haven't ever studied genetics...
1 supreme7god 2018-05-06
I know very little about genetics. BIO 101 stuff. But, I’ve never inseminated any other species to know if we are capable of reproducing with them.
I should say, Caucasians were probably a more advanced race at the time and came from their native planet after it was destroyed.
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-05-06
Are you just trolling, or do you have some reasons to back this up?
1 supreme7god 2018-05-06
Once again I’m being attacked for presenting new ideas.
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-05-06
It's definitely not a new idea, it's very reminiscent of the Aryan conspiracy theories that the Nazis had, and I'm just wondering what evidence made you consider it
1 supreme7god 2018-05-06
I read about Aryan people in David Icke’s book.
And it’s not empirical data, but I believe caucasians sought refugee on Earth and enslaved its people. Also, ancient Egyptian pictures depict the people as light brown to dark with black hair. From what I’ve seen, there weren’t many representations of those with White skin, if any. Caucasians can’t bare The Sun as do people with darker skin. According to evolution, you would think they would have adapted to the natural climate of this planet after many years.
Just my hypothesis.
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-05-06
Evolution selects out punishes traits that affect your odds of reproducing. The degree to which we get affected by the sun doesn't really change our chances of reproducing. Also even if there are differences in skin cancer rates, I would guess that that usually shows up after people have already passed childbearing age
1 Magnum_44 2018-05-06
Evidence can possibly be in the form of O negative blood, which was quite common in Germany and pockets of Europe. O neg, is universal blood donor, villages Medieval Europe which were predominantly O neg, were resistant and at times totally immune to the bubonic plague. I know of a few very close people to me who are O neg. They are never sick. Never. And the weird thing about rh negative blood types (blood type lacking rhesus factor) is that the females cannot naturally reproduce with males of positive blood type. It's almost like they are in fact a different species. Without recent advances in medicine (namely rhogam shots) The women reject the fetus, much like the animal kingdom and species too far apart. An example maybe like mules and donkeys unable to further the genetic line.
1 Dekodev 2018-05-06
And Jews are from Jupiter
1 showmeurboobsplznthx 2018-05-06
Israel was the ones who hacked and leaked all the democrats stuff to Wikileaks and DCLeaks to kill JCPOA. Israel has said Iran is months away from nukes for 30 years and JCPOA makes it hard to carry out their fear power play to justify their illegal nukes and actions.
1 gametheory94 2018-05-06
Yeah if trump is a puppet of any foreign country it's Israel
1 Atheuz 2018-05-06
Some subsection of the elites of the world participate in ritual sexual abuse and murder of children. Probably for the purpose of secret keeping and blackmail, i.e. if you want to be in the 'in-crowd' you are forced to participate in these acts in a way that make it 'impossible' for you to tell anyone about this without being personally ruined. This allows the elite to induct new members, while everyone is kept in control by everyone else by their shared rituals. There is probably also some who participate for 'religious' reasons, i.e. they are Luciferian and believe human sacrifice provides them with sustained power, wealth, and more time.
1 doglover331 2018-05-06
I just found this on here & you’re absolutely right about this theory
http://www.whale.to/b/pedophocracy.html
1 Ba55ah0lic 2018-05-06
I watched a documentary last night that was I guess slightly similar to this. In Afghanistan all the higher ups in the police force and government have little boys who they keep on the police compounds and I quote " To fuck their asses at night,if they don't have the little boys, whose asses are they supposed to fuck? Their own grandmothers?" Also if the little boys try to escape they are shot or severely beaten, there have also been cases where kids have shot each other.
1 apunasatapatapuIobin 2018-05-06
The Holocaust was a hoax. Yes, lots of Jews died; and so did lots of other people. But no, I don't believe the Germans were gassing thousands of Jews to death and burning mountains of corpses to ash. It's not even feasibly possible. And anyone looking at the evidence objectively should come to similar conclusions.
1 Lolabanana123 2018-05-06
I’ve been so interested in this topic for a little while now. Can you explain to me what exactly is your view point and how you got to your conclusion? I’m genuinely not trolling, it’s an honest question
1 Daryatash 2018-05-06
Many governments use electronic warfare on their citizens that affect moods, actions, thoughts from a distance.
1 Da_llluminati 2018-05-06
after noticing videos of Israeli soldats mistreating the Palestinians, esp. children posted on here and elsewhere EVERY DAMN DAY, I'm of the opinion that there is a concerted effort to tarnish their people.
think about it for a second. if the juice really run this bitch, that sort of thing would never get out, let alone be published every day.
1 amateurrocketbuilder 2018-05-06
Jews
1 PingTiao 2018-05-06
That religion has been (for a long time) weaponized for psychological operations against US citizens to control their minds at the deepest levels, preventing people from accurately perceiving events while also encouraging and dissuading a range of behaviors and thoughts. Not a popular theory in many conspiracy circles.
1 CovfefeAddictedMonky 2018-05-06
Nobody's gonna post what they really think because the opposing side is gonna harass them lol
1 haha-hehe-haha-ho 2018-05-06
The US and China are actively engaged in warfare in outer space. This is kept from the public because it involves the deployment of several closely guarded advanced technologies.
1 apunasatapatapuIobin 2018-05-06
I'm curious as to why you believe this. Can you forward some info?
1 haha-hehe-haha-ho 2018-05-06
There's not a lot of info on this in the public domain, and I don't know of a single source that has compiled all the known evidence on this, but I'd point to some of the topics that I've researched that led me to this conclusion.
There's been a significant uptick in the frequency of unannounced military satellite launches carrying top secret payloads in recent years, and seemingly sudden interest from Trump in establishing a Space Force program. The X37-B program is also particularly interesting, along with DARPA's Falcon project, and China's Shelong space-craft.
Here's a surface level article from Bloomberg: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-21/there-s-a-new-cold-war-brewing-in-space
The scarce details the government releases on space capabilities (communications, surveillance, recon, electromagnetism, kinetic weaponry, etc) are already very impressive - and given that the public's knowledge of secret tech lags far behind current capabilities, it's hard to imagine what can actually be done now.
1 AmpedMonkey 2018-05-06
Interesting, care to give us a source/some info?
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-05-06
I am also interested in hearing more. And another reason they might keep it secret - I think war in space is illegal?
1 haha-hehe-haha-ho 2018-05-06
The Outer Space Treaty prohibits placing WMD's in space or on other celestial bodies (like the Moon, or Mars) but leaves the door open for new types of weaponry - like kinetic bombardment. It also doesn't address weaponization or warfare between man-made platforms, like spacecraft or satellites.
1 h0ckeyphreak 2018-05-06
That Newtown was a hoax. The holocaust didn't happen. Chemtrails. Las Vegas was a false flag...I can do this all day.
1 Ba55ah0lic 2018-05-06
Las Vegas was quite fishy to me also
1 a-n-o-n-88 2018-05-06
Government is slavery and democracy invariably leads towards incremental erosion of individual rights.
1 stordoff 2018-05-06
Mine's almost an anti-conspiracy theory - many conspiracy theories are the result of people at the top not knowing well enough what they are doing, and making arbitrarily decisions that could look like they form a conspiracy, and they are happy for these theories to propagate as they project an air of influence/power.
(Note that this doesn't preclude conspiracies actually taking place -- NSA/GCHQ et al. is a well-founded example of how competency and conspiracy can overlap -- just that I feel many theories are asking for a degree of competency and foresight that probably isn't always there).
1 OccamsSharpWhatever 2018-05-06
I have this theory that the mandela effect is a marketing scam, made to get corporate advertising to a crowd that otherwise mostly avoids msm
1 tangled_night_sleep 2018-05-06
I dig it.
1 brglynn 2018-05-06
The top secular UFO researchers of the 20th century concluded “Aliens” were A) evil, B) extra-dimensional C) likely demonic.
Plenty of research online for those interested.
1 Luke4_5thru8KJV 2018-05-06
...and if the alien paradigm is promoted nonstop in all modern media, then what does that imply?
1 BreakingBadEndind 2018-05-06
My most controversial conspiracy theory is that the truth about this place that the elite are hiding from us would make us all go mad.
In other words, we are given a fake world view because the real situation we are in would be hellish if we ever found out.
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-05-06
Kinda similar but I feel a certain strange pity for the elite, whomever you may consider them to be. I imagine that they must use powerful mind/thought control techniques, like what you hear about North Korean defectors being afraid of their dear leader being able to read their minds from hundreds of miles away. After going through a few prolonged bouts of existential paranoia myself I can understand how being afraid of seemingly inescapable threats can affect you.
One of my friends was a victim of satanic ritual abuse. He's shared with me how his abusers were also controlled by someone above them, a vicious ladder. Freaking dark
1 Luke4_5thru8KJV 2018-05-06
Demons are everywhere, and they grant supernatural powers to those who worship them, but no worldly gains are worth eternity burning in the Lake of Fire. "Curse not the king, no not in thy thought; and curse not the rich in thy bedchamber: for a bird of the air shall carry the voice, and that which hath wings shall tell the matter." Ecclesiastes 10:20
1 fuckfuckdot 2018-05-06
The planes that hit WTC and the Pentagon were technologically simulated.
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-05-06
Wouldn't it just be easier to do it with real planes though?
1 fuckfuckdot 2018-05-06
Sure but they were testing how easy it was to mislead the people and how well they could be manipulated using the technology to carry out a simulation like this. It gave them an insight into how well Project Blue Beam would work.
1 Tassnomass 2018-05-06
Real plane, fitted with front facing energy weapon, projected simulation that skins the plane so we can't see the visible gadgets maybe.
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-05-06
That still sounds way more complicated than just flying a plane into a building though
1 SgtBrutalisk 2018-05-06
Astrology is real, the elites know about it and use it in their daily lives. Egocentrism prevents people from realizing we're at the mercy of the Sun, which generates all life and 99% of energy in the Solar system. Why is then so difficult to believe other planets might be influencing life in some similar fashion, though with invisible sources of radiation and energy? It's impossible to get any kind of sensible debate on the matter.
1 imightbejen 2018-05-06
Wasn’t it JP Morgan who said that millionaires don’t use astrology, but billionaires do?
1 SgtBrutalisk 2018-05-06
Never heard that.
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-05-06
Yeah I'd like a source for that quote...
1 astralrocker2001 2018-05-06
All Humans Are Forced To Reincarnate. This is horribly Sad But True...
1 Adrix__ 2018-05-06
That autism causes vaccines
1 Grant7899 2018-05-06
That Saturn used to be in front of our sun! Also there were very advanced civilizations that recorded this but something happened that sunk Atlantis and pushed saturn away giving its rings. Supposedly the hexagon storm on it holds some power. I guess most information was lost in the great library of Alexandria but some scrolls have been found in tombs in Egypt and all over the world reporting this phenomenon.
1 n02_ 2018-05-06
Holocaust was blown way out of proportion to hide behind the evil of dropping 2 nukes on civilian targets. Hence the "bad guys vs good guys" official narrative.
1 Deesnuts77 2018-05-06
While I do not subscribe to the FE theory, I do dabble in it as an exercise of how deep our reality could be controlled if there was an agenda at play that was the extreme long game.
WHAT IF the biblical story of the devil being cast out of heaven and given a period of time to get humans to stop believing in God were true? What a fucking genius plan that he (the devil) would take his millennia of time that he would be given to play this loooong game. Generations and generations of humans teaching their children that the universe is huge and so complex that there is no way that it could have been “created” it must have happened through hap and circumstance. Look at where we are now. There is a tangible shift in our generation and the next of disbelief in god.
It’s just something I find really interesting. It’s given me the mentality to never completely disregard any idea since we don’t really have concrete proof of a lot of things. I enjoy exploring theories no matter how “far fetched” some people might think.
Again, before the fucking villagers with the torches head up the mountain to burn the monster that is Flat Earth start in on me. I don’t believe the earth it flat because I have yet to come across any concrete tangible proof that I can test and see and perform experiments on my own to prove it to myself. That being said, I don’t have proof to that degree of the earth being round either.
1 Gump_Worsley_III 2018-05-06
The only one I can think of gives people pause when I mention it is "We are living in a simulated reality for the sole purpose of feeding negative energy to the Archons who control us and the illusion of reality"
1 Luke4_5thru8KJV 2018-05-06
The Bible is God's word, and contains the true history of the world. Also, Jesus Christ is God's only begotten son. The Bible is the most hated and censored book in the world. The Bible is banned in public schools around the world, and "progress" has long been defined in popular culture as moving away from God and biblical ethics.
1 Tassnomass 2018-05-06
Nazi-break military-centric society. Probably 3-5 generations old now, or more.
Thelema controlled, taught different "new" language.
Probably propagandized to view non-antarticans as evil enemies of the homeland, which mist either be enslaved or eradicated.
They have UFOs, will be used. We'll have a chance if we use our own reverse engineered craft.
1 Rambles64 2018-05-06
Giants
1 MalnourishedModem 2018-05-06
Time is something that humans created. The only “real” time is now. Therefore I don’t believe time travel can ever be possible
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-05-06
We are all time travelers! We travel at about sixty seconds per minute
1 48packet 2018-05-06
If you fly from the US to China and keep heading west, what happens?
1 BillNyeScienceLies 2018-05-06
The general public doesn't browse r/conspiracy
1 48packet 2018-05-06
Spencer, totally agree. Bernie.. I don't think a guy who has been independent on his own for decades would do this.
Also, Bernie wasn't good for Hillary in the 2016 primary. If he was part of the plan how come she wouldn't even say his name for so long? Why we're all the DNC debates scheduled during college football games? According to your theory they would want him front and center for all to hear, but it didn't go that way. Don't see it..
1 ewwwwwzipties 2018-05-06
I haven't disrespected you once.. To be honest, you should learn to interact like an adult before you pretend to be one..
You're completely unreasonable and offer no substance to the conversation..
1 ewwwwwzipties 2018-05-06
I'm trying to discuss, you don't bring up any valid points.. I can only go by what you give me.. If asking for proof is some kind of tactic, I can obviously see this isn't going anywhere.. Beat your chest all you want, it doesn't change the fact that you've presented no truth, and no discussion.. You're obviously very insecure about yourself and no amount of projecting will help you..
Good luck
1 supreme7god 2018-05-06
They are of the Earth. I believe earthlings all had brown-ish skin with natural black hair.
1 snowingwords 2018-05-06
I honestly think Richard is just a nationalist, but because of that he is automatically labeled as a "neo-Nazi", "racist", "xenophobic" (all of those words were on his Wikipedia page for months, might still be on there), without any research into his actual views. He doesn't seem like a racist - he does ask important questions about race and ethnicity, but not in a bad way (imo).
1 CovfefeAddictedMonky 2018-05-06
The bullshit story goes white people are aliens and Asians are part white unless you like them in which case they're now black. Or brown skinned, or whatever.
1 TotesMessenger 2018-05-06
I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:
If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)
1 purpledart 2018-05-06
Ack Ack.
1 666Evo 2018-05-06
Do you believe other planets are round or flat?
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-05-06
You'd just call any level of evidence fake...
1 haha-hehe-haha-ho 2018-05-06
The Outer Space Treaty prohibits placing WMD's in space or on other celestial bodies (like the Moon, or Mars) but leaves the door open for new types of weaponry - like kinetic bombardment. It also doesn't address weaponization or warfare between man-made platforms, like spacecraft or satellites.
1 supreme7god 2018-05-06
I read about Aryan people in David Icke’s book.
And it’s not empirical data, but I believe caucasians sought refugee on Earth and enslaved its people. Also, ancient Egyptian pictures depict the people as light brown to dark with black hair. From what I’ve seen, there weren’t many representations of those with White skin, if any. Caucasians can’t bare The Sun as do people with darker skin. According to evolution, you would think they would have adapted to the natural climate of this planet after many years.
Just my hypothesis.
1 Magnum_44 2018-05-06
Evidence can possibly be in the form of O negative blood, which was quite common in Germany and pockets of Europe. O neg, is universal blood donor, villages Medieval Europe which were predominantly O neg, were resistant and at times totally immune to the bubonic plague. I know of a few very close people to me who are O neg. They are never sick. Never. And the weird thing about rh negative blood types (blood type lacking rhesus factor) is that the females cannot naturally reproduce with males of positive blood type. It's almost like they are in fact a different species. Without recent advances in medicine (namely rhogam shots) The women reject the fetus, much like the animal kingdom and species too far apart. An example maybe like mules and donkeys unable to further the genetic line.
1 fuckfuckdot 2018-05-06
Sure but they were testing how easy it was to mislead the people and how well they could be manipulated using the technology to carry out a simulation like this. It gave them an insight into how well Project Blue Beam would work.
1 Tassnomass 2018-05-06
Real plane, fitted with front facing energy weapon, projected simulation that skins the plane so we can't see the visible gadgets maybe.
1 YourHeadWillCollapse 2018-05-06
It was a pressure release valve. The Republicans tried to use Ron Paul to the same end, but his 2008 popularity snuck up on them. It was relatively uncharted territory. Not so much a decade later though.
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-05-06
But if you have the tech to run accurate society-level simulations wouldn't you probably have had some kind of mind control tech long before that? The ability to run a simulation at that scale is pretty damn far out
1 HellsquidsIntl 2018-05-06
I was just thinking that tomorrow.