The moon landing?
1 2018-05-24 by xfan412
So i have a question about the story we are giving about the moon landing. In there version of events who shot the video?
1 2018-05-24 by xfan412
So i have a question about the story we are giving about the moon landing. In there version of events who shot the video?
33 comments
1 Swangin84 2018-05-24
Lots of nasa lovers here so you might not get too many responces. You can see maaaaany errors in any era of "space footage" with the iss fakery being the most recent and poorly executed. Basically the questions that are begged by all this are as follows.
If they went, where is the real footage?
If they didnt, why lie about it? Cold war? Not likely because the lieing would have ended after thay point but it only ramped up.
Did they fake footage due to some issue with showing us the truth?
How vast is space really? Would the size and characteristics of spaces true nature change our world views?
If its all faked than why are they trying to get you to buy into the infinite/nothingness space ideas?
Why were we able to cross the van allen belts in the 60's but now its some sort of impossible problem?
Why did they destroy the old tech which astronaut don petit says is really tough to re build?
How did the original footage AND the telemetry data disappear?
If you get through all these you will be a tad closer.
1 Blakwulf 2018-05-24
Curious as to what direction you're going with that? Is it a flat Earth thing?
1 Swangin84 2018-05-24
Nah just literally how big is that black expanse? Someone can say infinite but we dont really know that, its just a nice idea that validates a bunch of other nice ideas.
1 Blakwulf 2018-05-24
I don't think we have words big enough to describe how big space is.
1 Swangin84 2018-05-24
You would have to know how big it is to know if you could describe it. The space propoganda could be partly to make it seem like an endless black void. If its boundaries were lets say waaaaaay smaller and possibly a containment or anything else you might think of. It would raise questions about our narrative. So they basically are expending a bunch of energy to give an example of a model, it has errors so it makes me wonder if its something else that would make me alter my own beliefs if i know the real nature of the model.
1 Swangin84 2018-05-24
Im not trying to be anti scientist either, i just think they looked at something big and just assumed it must be endless. It helps other theories they have so they might lean toward infinite without acctually knowing. We might not be misled about space completely but something dont smell right.
1 SugusMax 2018-05-24
There are literally established theories about the universe's size and expansion rate... If you bother to Google them. I don't know why you'd ask this question.
1 WhydoesNASAlie 2018-05-24
Axis of Evil. We are the center of it all. Our world is the stage.
1 SugusMax 2018-05-24
That's a very pre-galileian way of thinking, hilariously also the view supported by the church for hundreds of years.... Hmm
1 WhydoesNASAlie 2018-05-24
The Principle, good documentary. We are the center of it all or we are a multiverse. Give it a watch
1 Swangin84 2018-05-24
A theory is a theory, if we believed them all we probably wouldent be on this board. I get it some people have a personal attatchment to sci fi and all the notions of space we've been told, not all of us feel that way though. If i said i didnt believe lee harvey oswald shot kennedy, you could say that there is an "established theory" about oswald shooting from the depository. You could also find this thoery with google and none this would make it true. If you think academia and the sciences arent touched by conspiracy your naive.
1 SugusMax 2018-05-24
It's actually naive of you to think science can be challenged and dismissed as simply as saying "a theory is a theory". These are models that have hundreds of scientist's input and work into them and are calculated with extreme precision. You can literally Google "how big is space and how do we know that" and get links to dozens of studies on the subject... There are constants that can be used to measure at least the estimated space of the known universe. A conspiracy theory is not the same as a scientific theory and both should never be regarded as equal.
1 Swangin84 2018-05-24
The earth shape thing is not as important as this specific anti nasa stuff. Regardless of the shape we have a 17 trillion dollar hole in the economy that needs answering for.
1 ChristianDYOR 2018-05-24
It’s a perfectly reasonable question given subject matter. Most people ask the same question once they have reason to suspect the official story is not true. Flat earth should be treated with the utmost suspicion, but not dismissed out of hand.
1 Blakwulf 2018-05-24
FE can 100% be dismissed out of hand.
1 ChristianDYOR 2018-05-24
Well that’s a very scientific method.
1 Blakwulf 2018-05-24
About as scientific as FE. :D
1 Swangin84 2018-05-24
That doesent disprove nasa being full of shit though which is the subject at hand brother.
1 ChristianDYOR 2018-05-24
As I read it, the OP asked very well thought out questions that require well thought out answers if (as I think we all agree) NASA is “full of shit”. The scientific method requires all theories that fit the facts at hand to be considered until such times as they can be eliminated.
1 Swangin84 2018-05-24
Or if we cant find facts we will hold at neutral, but some people just want an answer to fill the void instead of being happy with an i dont know till you could prove anything.
1 whenipeeithurts 2018-05-24
It's flat. They created the spinning ball lie to hide God by trying to discredit Genesis with science falsely so called.
1 xfan412 2018-05-24
None of that was helpful.
1 Swangin84 2018-05-24
I realised what you meant by your original question, its a good one. Especially the shot of the lunar lander, landing, taken from the moon. It just leads back to a fakery attempt, which begs the question, why?
1 farmersboy70 2018-05-24
I've never seen a film of the LM landing on the moon, filmed from the moon. They filmed it taking off using the camera on the Lunar Rover...
1 Swangin84 2018-05-24
Film as in a photo, my bad.
1 farmersboy70 2018-05-24
Film, photo...I've never seen anything shot from the Moon's surface showing the LM landing.
1 IMA_Catholic 2018-05-24
Link please.
1 Swangin84 2018-05-24
Its the famous one the ship landing, ill grab a link later if i remember after work.
1 platinum_peter 2018-05-24
Sure it is.
1 IMA_Catholic 2018-05-24
For example?
FE people have a REALLY difficult time explaining how GPS works. So far I haven't meet a single person who can.
1 Swangin84 2018-05-24
Im not a flat earther, just a guy whose anti nasa after relooking into the conspiracy. Why cant i believe we're on a globe and think the space agencies are full of shit?
1 IMA_Catholic 2018-05-24
Because evidence.
1 whenipeeithurts 2018-05-24
Watch the documentary "A funny thing happened on the way to the moon"