Why did they bulldoze it?
1 2018-06-08 by VeryGrumpyTiger
This is damn fishy to me and it's all I need to know that there is more to the story.
Some guy tries to expose an area where *allegedly children were harmed and I say *allegedly cause I don't know for certain what happened there, I'm not there.
But they bulldoze the area? What the hell, that is fishy like why would they so quickly bring a bulldozer and wipe the entire area? All humans act the same when they want to get rid of something quickly, we destroy it.
Look man I'm just some dude, no idea what is going on but the bulldozing thing is suspicious in a real way to me cause it's quite human to quickly destroy something when it poses a threat.
52 comments
1 BeaLack 2018-06-08
Could you be more vague?
1 VeryGrumpyTiger 2018-06-08
Sorry, talking about the Tuscon case but it's all over this sub so I thought anyone would know what I mean.
1 xolotl-tlaloc 2018-06-08
yea, not vague at all -- you just need to pay attention.
1 pornbama 2018-06-08
Not everybody reads every thread in this sub. I thought he was talking about Sandy Hook until I read his answer this comment.
1 russianbot01 2018-06-08
So couldn't get the police to show up for days but a bulldozer shows up lickidyspilt?
1 VeryGrumpyTiger 2018-06-08
Yea, there is no logic in this other than wiping evidence.
1 HerMileHighness 2018-06-08
Yeah, quite a project to complete so quickly. Hauled off all that junk, dug up the pvc tank, leveled the whole area..
1 VeryGrumpyTiger 2018-06-08
Damn, this evidence is why some people hold onto this case so strongly I believe. You can't easily explain this away, it's not a normal reaction to a crime scene.
Any police officers here who could explain why the bulldozing might have happened for investigative purposes?
1 Illadelphmilk 2018-06-08
Now it's supposedly on fire.
At least we know we were on to something. They wouldn't bulldoze and burn a nothing.
1 Warden_de_Dios 2018-06-08
according to the video of the Patriot being interviewed at the police station by the LT, the cops showed up the day the 911 call was placed, the patriot admits he hid in the tower and watched the cops arrive enter, did not see the cops taking photos, unclear if it was due to distance. Detectives came back out on Friday, unclear how long they were there. They left and said it was just a homeless camp.
Interview here
Im not sure where the claim the police wouldn't show up came from, the patriot was the one that admits in the video he waited several days to call the police.
In this video they also discuss why the sheriff showed up and detained or questioned 2 members of VOP (not the patriot) someone on I-19 reported seeing 2 men on top of a billboard sign brandishing AR-15s. This was the day of or day after the patriot was streaming on facebook that any and all patriots need to come down and patrol I19 for traffickers that were trying to remove evidence, look for any trucks pulled over on the side of the road, etc.
Im not sure if the sheriff's detaining the two VOP members happened in front of local Cemex management but management was present when the father and son showed up and admitted to putting the logs and tarp on top of the tank. I can imagine even if Cemex isn't guilty of child trafficking they would want to do whatever they could to make everyone go away.
But mayor rothschild may have ordered the immediate destruction of incriminating evidence.
1 LEDponix 2018-06-08
We need to start moving videos and media to libre analogues outside of fb/yt. I think dtube does this but it needs people hosting the media and doesn't have its own storage
1 RocketSurgeon22 2018-06-08
This is a nice summary.
Question: what is the legal classification of homeless? Wouldn't any person crossing the border illegally be homeless?
1 WhydoesNASAlie 2018-06-08
Word. Like the port-a-potty’s showing up at sandy hook
1 Loose-ends 2018-06-08
A better question is who actually ordered and paid to have what was at least a potential crime site immediately bull-dozed and destroyed rather than subjecting it to more thorough and intensive inspection just to make absolutely sure? Especially if there were any indications at all that it could have involved child-trafficking.
1 Warden_de_Dios 2018-06-08
If you are Cemex would you be worried about a site the police tell you is not a child trafficking camp but just a homeless camp or would you be worried about the guy on facebook telling the world he discovered a child rape camp and it turns out the guy has a criminal record and is not allowed to even own a gun.
Things would have been different if the expert in child trafficking had decided to call the police instead of handing over to someone who may be off his rocker.
1 God_Dammit_Ricky 2018-06-08
Seriously what school are you talking about? It happened at sandy hook, indiana, texas...
1 punisherfist 2018-06-08
Not a school, i assumed it was a school too when i read bulldozer.
1 NYC_Subway 2018-06-08
They pulled a building 7
1 Lynx436 2018-06-08
Everyone knows building 7 was made out of Lincoln Logs, that's why a small office fire brought the whole thing down all at once.
1 TinderDom 2018-06-08
There is literally no evidence that the camp was bulldozed.
I will admit to being wrong once evidence is presented.
1 VeryGrumpyTiger 2018-06-08
It's on fire at the moment, people are posting pictures. I guess I have no direct evidence for the bulldozer either other than word of mouth, the fire has pictures though.
1 TinderDom 2018-06-08
I thought it was bulldozed. How can it be on fire?
1 HerMileHighness 2018-06-08
The dirt part (the stuff that doesn't burn) of the camp was leveled by a bulldozer. The brush part (the stuff that burns) is burning).
Have you been outside before?
1 TinderDom 2018-06-08
I have yet to see evidence that anything was bulldozed.
Not holding my breath at this point.
1 HerMileHighness 2018-06-08
Have you looked? Or are you waiting to be served?
1 TinderDom 2018-06-08
I'm not the one making claims so why should I go look?
Those who make the claim should provide the evidence.
1 HerMileHighness 2018-06-08
Here. Served.
https://np.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8pck9j/someone_is_actively_destroyingbulldozing_the
1 TinderDom 2018-06-08
Two blurry pictures of a downed tree.
Is that a fucking joke?
1 HerMileHighness 2018-06-08
It is a good starting point for you. Do some research, there is video evidence as well but I'm fundamentally opposed to linking facebook- I'm guessing you have one. There you will find the photo from the Tucson Police Dept and they will have a photo of a cleared site.
Happy hunting!
1 TinderDom 2018-06-08
OK, I will repeat it:
I am not the one making the claim that the camp was bulldozed.
Therefore, I will not go looking for evidence that the claim is true.
1 HerMileHighness 2018-06-08
That's fine. But you are making the claim that it wasnt, I showed you evidence that it was and you are refusing it. Now you are on your own to disprove me.
1 TinderDom 2018-06-08
Where did I claim that it wasn't? I have stated that there is no evidence.
1 HerMileHighness 2018-06-08
If you don't like the evidence I've provided and you are still interested in the subject, check the sources that I've provided. That is all the effort I'm putting towards you.
1 UnseenPresence2016 2018-06-08
And this is why conspiracy isn't believed by people. Because those making their claims never seem to get that it's THEIR JOB to prove something has happened. The one claiming something is the one who has to show their claim is valid.
1 HD3D 2018-06-08
Debate is not the sole purpose of a conspiracy board. Exhange of ideas between the open minded ,with the drive to seek their own evidence, does not require the "conversion" or approval of skeptics.
1 LeeKinanus 2018-06-08
this has to be the dumbest sentence i have read on r/conspiracy, and that is a monumental statement.
1 ItsWorthReading 2018-06-08
You're right. Debate isn't discernment.
1 CordouroyStilts 2018-06-08
As long as those are presented as ideas. The bulldozing/fire are events being stated as fact. It is definitely on the one make the claim to cite sources.
1 HerMileHighness 2018-06-08
It's my bartenders job to serve drinks but he reserves the right to refuse service.
1 zachij 2018-06-08
Haha dont let the 'organic truthseekers' wear you down. Appreciate the post, its as specific as you can get, barring a drone shot in 4k
1 thedrunkgoldfish 2018-06-08
So basically you've got nothing.
1 thistookmethreehours 2018-06-08
Nice Facebook burn
1 Khemikal-Ali 2018-06-08
just like how all the evidence of 9/11 was collected uo and shipped off ASAP. same shit.
1 htok54yk 2018-06-08
They sold the evidence for Christ's sake!
1 rodental 2018-06-08
To cover the evidence.
1 bostonbean 2018-06-08
Same reason they bulldozed Waco within days.
1 LeeKinanus 2018-06-08
same reason the tower steel was sent to china so quickly. Same reason no footage from SH.
1 tjweeks 2018-06-08
It sounds just like what happened on 911. They started "cleaning" up all the debris AND EVIDENCE the very next day. That was one of the first things that really was out of place. They should have been going through all that wreckage for months.
1 Lord_Augastus 2018-06-08
Because covering things up and pretending nothing happened is how they do have always done it. The idiot public gets a new socialist thing to get emotional about from the msm, and no one's the wiser.
1 BeaLack 2018-06-08
Ok cool going back to read everything ever posted to get up to date.
1 flaming_kebab1631 2018-06-08
Whats goin on?