Metaconspiracy: THIS IS DISTRACTION!?
1 2018-08-04 by achepea
Thought: the “Sarah Jeong hates white people story” broke over the last 2-3 days... around the same time as the Vegas case gets closed (“nothing to see here, folks!”). The Jeong hoopla gets a ‘head start’ so that tempers can really rise in response to the most comically tone-deaf response from the NYT.
So comically tone-deaf, in fact, that all the attention and all the anger is conveniently directed to it, and not the farcical “acted alone, no evidence of conspiracy, no motive determined, (but no you still can’t watch video footage of the lobby sorry)” conclusion to the worst mass shooting in the history of the United States.
The mockingbird media can sway opinion in ways other than just telling you outright what you should think.
This distraction is far easier to pull off than a school shooting/false flag.
32 comments
1 achepea 2018-08-04
SS: The only reason the NYT defended Sarah is to create a viral outcry of justified frustration and incredulity, for the purpose of distracting from the close of the farcical investigation into the worst mass shooting in U.S. history without any conclusions on motive, but with total preclusion that more than one person was involved, that it had anything to do with terrorism, or that there is any evidence of a conspiracy.
1 Dazzlerocks 2018-08-04
100% agree
1 YetiBoney 2018-08-04
In fact, the entire Sarah ‘breaking-viral-news-through-NYT-social-identity-victim-manufactured-distraction’ has probably been locked and loaded for some time; a tactical obfuscation bomb.
1 achepea 2018-08-04
Fantastic idea.. How many others are loitering up the sleeve of the MassStressMalignancy? Sick. Thanks for the share.
1 odd-meter 2018-08-04
This is also conveniently timed with the “Unite The Right” rally in DC, where BLM and others are already scheduled to make a surely contentious appearance. Perhaps more angry White Males are needed for this scene?
1 Renatusisk 2018-08-04
Where is BLM schedule available?
1 odd-meter 2018-08-04
Who the hell knows, it could very easily be fake news. Sure. It’s just what I heard on my local news and read from the local DC news website. I personally feel that it’s all artificial. A “build it and hype it, and they will come” kind of a thing. I think they just want this racial violence to occur so they can run it on the giant news machine 24/7.
1 Renatusisk 2018-08-04
Can you give me the names of your local news and website so I can look into this as you will not provide a link?
1 odd-meter 2018-08-04
Google it. Fox 5 DC news
1 Renatusisk 2018-08-04
I did it! Here I am willing to share a link too!
http://www.fox5dc.com/news/local-news/black-lives-matter-dc-preparing-counter-protest-against-white-civil-rights-rally-near-white-house
Reading it, it states that BLM and Shut down DC plan on doing a counter-protest and are working on dealing with safety. They are also protesting White Civil Rights Rally who was unavailable for comment.
Finally, BLM will be teaching about fighting racism and fascism.
What makes you think from this article that they will be inciting violence?
1 flyPeterfly 2018-08-04
What makes you think he thinks that from this article that they will be inciting violence? He definitely told you already, it starts with "I personally feel" - kind of a fancy way of saying "I think." I did it!
1 Renatusisk 2018-08-04
I know what it is. I've tried treating people like adults and like they are on my level. Now I'll treat them according to how they present themselves.
1 GalaxiesFall 2018-08-04
Bruh... you sound like a pretentious little cock munch. Don’t be like that.
1 CelineHagbard 2018-08-04
Removed. Rule 4. 1st warning.
1 GalaxiesFall 2018-08-04
1st warning for what?
Calling someone out for being an asshole?
Bitch please.
1 GalaxiesFall 2018-08-04
Just calling it how I see it captain.
1 Drinkycrow84 2018-08-04
YoU'rE aN aNgRy WhItE mAlE!
1 Justsaguy12345 2018-08-04
Too many upvotes to be real.
1 AudioSugar 2018-08-04
I disagree because bringing attention to anti white racism in western society begins to make people question why. If anything a shooting like Las Vegas is a distraction. The consequences of a single shooting, verses the consequences of the end result of the kind of racial hatred+demographic replacement and its origins being found out are far more reaching to the established order.
1 YetiBoney 2018-08-04
That rests on the premise that they remain in control of the narrative, instead of chaotically stumbling in reaction to the ever-increasing stream of evidence of corruption, propaganda, and despairing extent of the shadow government’s control, by recklessly firing off preloaded counter-op viral sensations intended to divide and distract the public its supposed to serve.
I believe it’s the latter. Their short term gain will be or long term gain; desperation is a sign of weakness.
And a stinky cologne.
1 Orangutan 2018-08-04
Friday is also traditionally the day to drop news you want people to forget.
1 achepea 2018-08-04
Fantastic addition- thank you.
1 justiceavenger 2018-08-04
Back when I started college and was a Republican and watched O'Reilly every night I remembered at one point the Friday show was always a guest host. At first I didn't think much of it, but then I realized every Friday was always a slow news day. I could skip Fridays episode and come Monday I wouldn't have missed anything important. If the media isn't going to take Friday news seriously then people aren't either. I'm glad I came to my senses.
1 Sendmyabar 2018-08-04
I guess people shouldn't be focusing their energy on obvious trolling based on people's aversion to focused racism. Remember, for the MSM there is no such thing as bad publicity. All they need is your attention, that's the goal.
1 achepea 2018-08-04
Cheers.
And once they smear a name / spread any idea... game over! Nobody hears the redaction or correction. Thanks for the contribution 😊
1 MrParadoxxx666 2018-08-04
Isaac whats gis face in Infowars was the bail in the coffin for Q for myself. Speaking of distractions, greased up deaf guy running around town, do you watch, try to catch him, or shield yours and/or another's eyes? If you wave him over and he doesnt come, he obviously has alternate motives than just gaining some attention.
1 Dzugavili 2018-08-04
Elaborate?
1 MrParadoxxx666 2018-08-04
I just took this pill so I feel ghe need to take aome time to introspect and regain my objective conciousness before discussing Q further. Read this post. What J can tell you is "white hats" are selected and do exist. However these are not the type of people who would claim a title of the people's "champion" as this isaac guy does during 30 minute videos.
The interview he did with the texas news outlet was a revision of the last 70+ minutes of pedophelic babble. To sit there and visualize the stories he iderates over and over IS the decensitazion that the white hats have been trying to warn the masses about. The most dangerous thimg about doing independant research is avoiding pitfalls of reprogramming. As a seeker for as long as I've had internet, J can assure you that you have been to the rodeo a few more times than you can remember. It's important to note that there is silver lining to everything, in the interview Alex Jones touches lightly kn the fact that Seth Green is the creator of robot chicken, a popular show on youth television when 90's kids were just old enough to have their own tv in their room. the show consisted of multiple short skits, quick jumps with an emphasis on a pop in the writing over any development in the literary term. At the time, internet .gifs often were influenced from this formula, and in turn, memes. (45 second clip with sound, 3-7 second clip with sound, image with 4-10 words) the idea of pushing a narrative while offering less and less actual information to take in has value worth pondering. especially with the gaslighting being directed at the essential creator of how we perceive and absorb information today Another precedent television program that faded the border between satire and propoghanda was notoriously MADtv. They we not only renown for their satire in the form of television skits, but for their magazine too. Note, that is in a time before internet was consumer friendly, both in terms of economic accessability and intellectual accessability.
I hope this presented an idea worth pondering beyond the initial thought of thrashing in water so you can drown whoever swims out to "save you"
1 gavvvvo 2018-08-04
Good point. Almost as if they hired her just for this controversy. Have a distraction card to play when required. They would have vetted her when she was being hired. They would have gone over her social media. This kind of tweet would be hard to miss in that process. The media should be showing some journalistic integrity on the Las Vegas event. The fact they are still being so secretive over surveillance footage should instantly set off red flags. The investigation is complete? so, there shouldn't be any problem releasing things now.
1 of_mendez 2018-08-04
This is not going away easily, also they always do this on Fridays, they release all the bombshells on fridays in case you have not noticed, its because there are less news on Saturday and Sunday
1 ZaphodBeeblebrox74 2018-08-04
Par for the course.
Just about anything that actually gets reported is, in my opinion, just distraction.
1 William_Harzia 2018-08-04
In addition the House just okayed the $100B increase in the military budget. To no fan fare whatsoever.
1 achepea 2018-08-04
Cheers.
And once they smear a name / spread any idea... game over! Nobody hears the redaction or correction. Thanks for the contribution 😊