The day JFK was shot was the day this country took a turn for the worse.

JFK has been a hero to me since I was young. Save for some of the shady shit he allegedly did with the ladies he was one of our last real presidents with good ideas and a drive to care. The rest have been a shit show slowly taking pieces of the pie his death allowed them to bake.

That whole deal is a joke, Nixons goons caught possibly stealing JFK documents during the Watergate scandal and then Ford being ok the commission only to pardon Nixon. That puppiteering could only be done if they all had a stake in his death and I believe they did.

Oh he most certainly was, the country saw hope in the Kennedy's they saw Bobby as a second chance and why shouldn't they? He was fighting for things his brother started. The fact that no real questions aside from conspiracy theorist arise from both of their deaths is crazy to me. That's vendetta killing. They tried to get Ted too with Chappaquiddick but they didnt count on him getting away. A mistake they didnt let happen with JFK jr.

JFK Jr would most likely have been President, if he wasn't MURDERED ALSO!?

Iirc the CIA came up with "conspiracy theorist" as a pejorative term specifically to confront the speculation about JFK assassination and criticism of the Warren Commission report.

My understanding is LBJ had proof the Nixon campaign sabotaged the peace talks with the Vietcong for political advantage. He couldn’t say anything about it cause it would have revealed a lot of illegal shady activity.

Nixon was afraid they had this and would use it in 72. That’s what they were looking for. Literal treason. (He did it.)

Reagan and Bush (what a coincidence!) did the same shit with the Iran hostages. Literally released as he got inaugurated.

The "Four B's" of politics: Bribes, Bullets, Bedrooms, and Blackmail

And Bushes

And Bush says he doesn't remember where he was that day.

I could be totally off base here, I remember reading this somewhere but I can’t recall, so I’ve got to ask; Didn’t technology advancement (publicly at least) slow down after that event as well?

Like literally everything starting going the wrong direction, and you could hypothesize that his assassination was the catalyst for a lot of the problems we face now.

what kind of technology are you thinking about? i'm not even sure if it's true, but the only kind that comes to my mind is the use of nuclear power plants.

Yeah Alan Dulles, who headed Bay of Pigs behind JFKs back, got fired by JFK. Allen's brother was the Dallas sherriff and Alan headed the Warren commission. And LBJs mistress said LBJ said the night before "after tomorrow, they'll never embarrass me again".

Presidents are mouth pieces. Kennedy was the only one who wasn't advised by Kissinger. JFK said he'd destroy the CIA. JFKs death was a message. They can kill a beloved political figure in broad daylight in front of everyone, blowing his head off in front of his wife, control the police investigation and get away with it Scott free. Bobby got taken out by the same copy paste plan. Multiple shooters, lone gunman/patsy.

All this talk of right, left, democratic, Republican, that's all just a way to divide us up among ourselves. None of that matters. As FDR said "presidents aren't elected, they're selected". The election is a scam. All to make us feel like we have a say in the matter. It's a monarchy disguised as a democracy. We are the kid in the car with the fake steering wheel next to the adult with the real wheel. We think we are steering the car, but in reality, we have no control over where it goes.

Have you read the whole transcript of his speech at Waldorf Astoria in April of 1961? As we all know, it is the speech where Kennedy publicly condemns secrecy/covert action of the government in order to suppress dissent. Please read the whole thing : My underatanding after reading the entire speech is Kennedy is calling upon the press to actually be more selective and practice more secrecy in which stories are released to the publix. This is exactly the opposite of what we had come to expect from Kennedy. Maybe not everything is so black and white with John Kennedy’s life and untimely death? I am willing to bet all of us at r/conspiracy have little to no idea what the man was like beyond the myth. Keep in mind, I am unable to find an actual instance of Kennedy saying he will destroy the CIA if I am allowed to disregard third hand accounts. I am we at r/conspiracy l are all being misled. Please do not take my word for it, do your own research. As mentioned, here is the full speech transcript: https://www.jfklibrary.org/Research/Research-Aids/JFK-Speeches/American-Newspaper-Publishers-Association_19610427.aspx

Article outlining the evidence arguing that Kennedy faked his own death. https://paleofuture.gizmodo.com/the-story-behind-that-jfk-quote-about-destroying-the-ci-1793151211

Happy hunting

Youre reply is so interesting you posted it twice??

Yeah...youre not a bot at all. 😐

JFK said he'd destroy the CIA

He didn't actually say that.

One of his advisors said this in reaction to National Security Memos 55 56, and 57, after Bay Of Pigs, in which Kennedy stated he was gonna hold the JCS accountable for all covert operations. Basically ending the CIA's autonomy to operate on its own without accountability.

First week in office, LBJ sent another memo to reverse this decision, and also reverse the plan to withdraw completely from Vietnam by '65.

Yeah the kill shot was like 2 inches from his head, Sirhan was across the room getting manhandled. Plus let's not forget the girl in the polka dot dress screaming "We killed the Senator!"

Funny thing that Reagan was forced to choose bush as his VP and then he was nearly assassinated almost right away. The bush coup was almost successful that day. We may have had a president (bush) who literally pulled the trigger on another (Kennedy).

Let's not forget good ol' Prescott betting on Hitler.

Maybe he shouldn't have fucked CIA and the freedom fighters at the Bay of Pigs. But he really was the last true Cold Warrior

He smelled the CIA's bullshit and took action. They didnt like that cause they run shit. It's a fucked country.

http://spartacus-educational.com/JFKindex.htm

What is funny is that people who “are deeply disturbed by the way Trump talks about women” are also ones who love JFK even though *we know for a fact he actually did pretty much everything that Trump has merely been accused of with women!”

Funniest thing to me is I dont care what they do with women or men, or whatever. Just as long as they do their damn jobs properly.

The reason to care is that they could become compromised by a corrupt partner. Ex. Monica Lewinsky could have been a Russian spy making Clinton open to Russian blackmail etc.

I get that, but the same could happen within his cabinet or a friend even so to focus solely on his romantic endeavors and turn them into scandals.

Clinton was bad enough without any blackmail.

sources?

None of the ones I am referring to are famous enough that their name is worthwhile.

But I am pretty sure that if you search YouTube, you could find many liberals who currently say they are disturbed talking highly of JFK. Start with news and talk broadcasts from previous anniversaries of his death.

I've heard about his "womanizing", no details just in general but have never heard any mention of pedophilia or rape. I suppose I could chalk up the womanizing to the times or whatever but pedophilia and rape shouldn't get a pass no matter who or when.

Rape may be a bit tricky because we are dealing with very different times, in 1965 grabbing a woman’s ass was considered de riguer.

I really can’t speak to pedophilia because in that case I have not heard a credible claim about either of them.

OK, that's kinda what I was thinking. I guess in the current situation we'll have to wait and see how it all plays out, if it ever really does. In Kennedy's case, I suppose it doesn't really matter at this point though it probably doesn't pay to idolize anyone too much any more.

That may have been the first sign, but it’s arguably when the CIA was created by Truman.

I'm sure Woodrow Wilson takes the cake for that when he sold all of us out to get elected

Yup. Caused ya to enter WW1 because he was a puppet for Zionists, and the Federal Reserve Act and the 16th Amendment (income tax) were passed under him.

It wasn't exactly "unwittingly" on Wilson's part. According to the documentary, The Money Masters, the political proxies for the international bankers pushing for central bank legislation made a deal with Wilson to put him in office provided that he would sign that legislation when it came through Congress. Also, according to the documentary, there were two versions of the legislation, one Democratic and one Republican essentially creating the same thing in both versions so one was sure to pass. The one that won was for the Federal Reserve Act.

It wasn't exactly "unwittingly" on Wilson's part. According to the documentary, The Money Masters, the political proxies for the international bankers pushing for central bank legislation made a deal with Wilson to put him in office provided that he would sign that legislation when it came through Congress. Also, according to the documentary, there were two versions of the legislation, one Democratic and one Republican essentially creating the same thing in both versions so one was sure to pass. The one that won was for the Federal Reserve Act.

Bullshit, the day Woodrow Wilson undid Andrew Jackson’s hard-fought victory over central banks the country was sold off.

We should never been involved in either world war. Staying out of those wars would have done more for us than having JFK alive and well back then. Not saying he was a bad guy, just that this country started to go down hill well before he was assassinated by our government

How do you stay out of the war after Pearl Harbor?

According to the aid that helped Eisenhower with his farewell speech, he intended to call it the "military/industrial/political complex", but was talked out of including that it had an entrenched political component, too, since it might be tempting fate just a little bit too much by going that far.

I believe Eisenhower was warning about something that already existed and that he'd run into it himself and been forced to back off if he wanted to stay alive.

Bear in mind it's an entity that thrives on and profits from killing people, even masses of people, or whole nations of people. What are few more lives no matter who they belong to with that kind of a murderous mindset?

Kennedy underestimated just how powerful and ruthless that group actually was and by killing him in broad daylight and seeing to it that the crime was whitewashed they pulled off a coup that has seen every president and politician since to go along with that insidious cabal and keep the money flowing to them.

Whether it's the CIA, CSIS in Canada, MI6 in Britain, and the rest of the Intelligence agencies, some of the top brass in all of their countries militaries, and plenty of their politicians, they all work "co-operatively" and in tandem with one another and they are calling the shots and in control and no one ever dares to challenge or go against them because they are just that dangerous.

i listened to an episode of hardcore history about the atomic bomb. supposedly truman was getting hounded by military generals looking to exploit the power of abombs, and many were of the mind that the us should go to war with russia before they developed their own. basically they had a big new hammer and had a lot of nails to pound.

after listening to the podcast, between all the military pressure to use them, and the close calls due to malfunctioning alert systems after the cold war began, it is unbelievable that they weren't used. mutual assurance of destruction is certainly a big part, and i think governments were happy to ship battles offshore. leading to the fucked up world we live in today 😢

JFK is a modern Lincoln.

Simply because we marched on and didn't abandon what was shoved down our throats.

This wasn't a coup, technically if Trump and Q are legit, what we've having now is a coup.

We were born sheep and told we inherited freedom, despite everyone here claiming it's only "better than being somewhere else" which is simply just ignorance and fear of change.

I think you need to double check what a coup is. JFK and several foreign leaders have been removed by our CIA. While sometimes it can be done by removing them from office most of the time they are assassinated. Trump is not being coup'd I dont see how you can think this.

If you knew what a coup was and had proof I was incorrect you would have pasted proof. "easily asserted can be easily dismissed".

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/coup

a highly successful, unexpected stroke, act, or move; a clever action or accomplishment.

If the media was militarized in 2012 and they're the last branch of the old coup still standing, then they're very much attempting a repeat.

McCarthy warned everyone, tho it was worse than even he thought.

The people supporting McCarthy were the ones who killed JFK. Do you seriously think the CIA is leftist?

The CIA, personally are not leftist but that doesn't mean they aren't pushing society in that direction. Check out Agenda 2030! it's a literal recipe for global socialism. When you tune into the MSM you'll here references to universal basic income and gun control. If you don't think its the CIA is pushing what we see in the media look into Operation Mockingbird!

The CIA is neither left nor right. They don't care. They're there for power.

The CIA was created to kill left wings, and over its ~70 years of doing that, its favorite strategy has always been to arm, fund, and otherwise build up explicitly right-wing movements in countries.

It’s not about left or right. It’s the ZOG.

Support TRUMP 🇺🇸🇨🇦 BE AWARE SPREAD THE WORD

He's part of the game but at least he's pretending to be opposition. We'll need reasonable foreign policy and much more corruption cleanup to convince me otherwise.

Why do people think he is part of the rest? Genuine question

The wars continue. Zero disclosure or arrests on 9/11. He is Republican Obama -- Hope and Change for conservatives.

What makes you think a rich executive who has lived a life of wealth gives a fuck about you? Was it the tax cuts for the wealthy that tipped you off? Or was it allowing asbestos back in, to help line people's pockets at the expense of the health of the people working with it?

Tell me - what the fuck gives you you the impression Trump is anything BUT another rich asshole who only looks out for people like him?

You won't get a logical response to this. Amazing how his loyal cult members disappear when the hard questions are posed. Dude fucking DEFINES the swamp.

That Canadian flag has no place in your post. Trump doesn't give a shit about alliances formed over decades and thousands of lost lives. The world is turning away from the US and it's thanks to Trump. Including Canada. You're no Canadian.

Think about it - if a regular joe citizen blew a gasket, went haywire and murdered a US president during a parade in broad daylight on live TV ... WHY ON EARTH WOULD ANYTHING NEED TO BE CLASSIFIED?

If a small group of terrorists flew planes into the World Trade Center resulting in the building’s complete structural failure and collapse ... WHY ON EARTH WOULD ANY INFORMATION REGARDING THE COLLAPSE BE CLASSIFIED?

We do not talk about actual politics because actual politics in the modern day is classified.

If there was information about how they managed to pull it off/how to cause collapse that would be classified

You don’t think they would want to clue in the architectural and construction firms? People that design and build future high rises?

You don't think they didn't?

Any dipshit can ask questions that don't have answers.

Paperclip = '63

If you look at it as a successful Bush coup it seems more office.

Prescott Bush tried earlier and failed.

GHWB went through the back door and the CIA who then made an agreement to try and control everything thereafter.

If you work forward from that premise, Johnson, Bush, Clinton, Bush 2, Obama, Hillary and other less senior players have been carefully placed since Kennedy.

That's just the public executive figures, imagine how many bureaucrats, judges and key cabinet heads have been placed in addition to even members of the military.

Think Q is real or not, he is redpilling thousands of normie conservatives on the Bushes and Israel. Part of me thinks that is the goal.

"Q" barely mentions the Bushes or Israel. Especially Israel is conspicuous by the silence of "Q" except for conveniently "saving Israel for last."

Go back and read Q drops from the beginning. The two have been central figures from the start, not always by name, but if you like this sub you will understand immediately. That's how I got into it.

I'm starting to believe a theory I had early on, and then drifted from: Q is Roger Stone, with legitimate classified info sprinkled in, too, and the main goal is to gain as many followers as possible, and cause the biggest shitshow whenever it becomes most convenient to do so. If Stone is indicted -- or when -- I expect Q to announce that the pedofiles and Clintons will escape unless everybody bum rushes a courthouse or something.

I like how you say "even" members of the military like they aren't a million times more susceptible to that than the other categories you named.

True, but armed forces are supposed to protect the country from threats "both foreign and domestic".

If the JFK assassination was done to achieve a coup (and I believe that it was), then it's stretching it a bit to imagine that every president and congressioner since 1963 has been a beneficiary.

Some of them, yes. Ford and HW Bush come to mind. Complete non-entities who suddenly found fortune smiling upon them (Ford was an unknown when he got appointed to the Warren Commission; Bush, we all know about).

But things are more complex than a simple transfer of power. Nixon wasn't in on the JFK assassination, but he knew a fair amount about who was.

You can see that (e.g.) picking Ford for Vice-President was a long-term strategy and that thanks to Ford's role on the Warren Commission, Nixon implicitly trusted Ford not to rock the boat. It paid off - Ford pardoned Nixon and Watergate never developed into the cataclysm that it could have been.

So yeah, some beneficiaries in the political system, but most US pols know nothing about the JFK case and care even less. The US is still running, on more or less the same lines as it was pre-JFK.

The idea that the US somehow lost its innocence with JFK's murder is only believable if you also believe that the US was in any state of "innocence" before it happened. I'm sure that most redditors on this sub can't possibly believe that idea.

So yeah, the JFK assassination was a nasty shock to the system, but it soon readjusted itself. A few crooks made political and literal profits from it, then the incident receded into the past.

The workings of politics have certainly changed a lot since JFK's death, but it's difficult to argue that these changes came about because of JFK's death.

Nixon by some accounts was at the Murchison Ranch meeting in 1963 on the night before the JFK assassination, with Dulles, Johnson, Texas oil men & others, if it happened.

Nixon was definitely in Dallas on 11/22/63, giving a speech to Pepsi Co. When asked where he was on the day JFK was shot, Nixon was one of 3 people who could not remember: neither could Bush, nor Richard Helms (who was with RFK when RFK got the news but could not remember this).

Nixon may have been framed for having foreknowledge. Nixon personally protected Jack Ruby during the 1950s when Nixon was VP and Ruby worked for the Chicago Mob as an FBI informant. Nixon's signature was on document protecting Ruby specifically. This document was likely used to select Ruby and/or obtain Nixon's silence, since it would have linked Nixon to Dallas or raised further questions.

If the reversal of JFK's NSAM-263 by LBJ was part of the coup, or a halt to JFK's "interference" in the U.S. monetary system (or the trajectory thereof) was part of the coup, then the U.S. indeed had beneficiaries.

The US is still running, on more or less the same lines as it was pre-JFK. The idea that the US somehow lost its innocence with JFK's murder is only believable if you also believe that the US was in any state of "innocence" before it happened

LBJ brought an unprecedented corporatism, a cooperation with corporations, into the Democratic Party, which was previously (since 1933) the opposite.

JFK announced a specific declaration that "We do not want a Pax Americana," the idea [based on Pax Romana] that the U.S. would be the world's police, enforcing a U.S.-based world peace. As recently as this week, Trump is embracing Pax Americana, as did Obama, and Bush/Cheney/PNAC made it the centerpiece of their ideology.

JFK ≠ Pax Americana.

All other Presidents since JFK = supported Pax Americana.

I'm sure that most redditors on this sub can't possibly believe that idea.

Yes, innocence is lost all the time, with every president. But especially with JFK's assassination.

Yes, JFK's assassination created a precedent of open murder and unchallenged shadow government (including military) supremacy over the democratic system of elections.

Yes, Oswald's assassination established the precedent of presumed guilty without trial being accepted by the U.S. public.

JFK's assassination was a turning point.

Nixon wasn't in on the JFK assassination, but he knew a fair amount about who was.

Nixon by some accounts was at the Murchison Ranch meeting in 1963 on the night before the JFK assassination, with Dulles, Johnson, Texas oil men & others, if it happened.

Nixon was definitely in Dallas on 11/22/63, giving a speech to Pepsi Co. When asked where he was on the day JFK was shot, Nixon was one of 3 people who could not remember: neither could Bush, nor Richard Helms (who was with RFK when RFK got the news but Helms could not remember this).

Nixon may have been framed for having foreknowledge. Nixon personally protected Jack Ruby during the 1950s when Nixon was VP and Ruby worked for the Chicago Mob as an FBI informant. Nixon's signature was on document protecting Ruby specifically. This document was likely used to select Ruby and/or obtain Nixon's silence, since it would have linked Nixon to Dallas or raised further questions.

The US is still running, on more or less the same lines as it was pre-JFK. The idea that the US somehow lost its innocence with JFK's murder is only believable if you also believe that the US was in any state of "innocence" before it happened

LBJ brought an unprecedented corporatism, a cooperation with corporations, into the Democratic Party, which was previously (since 1933) the opposite.

JFK announced a specific declaration that "We do not want a Pax Americana," the idea [based on Pax Romana] that the U.S. would be the world's police, enforcing a U.S.-based world peace. As recently as this week, Trump is embracing Pax Americana, as did Obama, and Bush/Cheney/PNAC made it the centerpiece of their ideology.

JFK ≠ Pax Americana.

All other Presidents since JFK = supported Pax Americana.

If the reversal of JFK's NSAM-263 by LBJ was part of the coup, or a halt to JFK's "interference" in the U.S. monetary system (or the trajectory thereof) was part of the coup, then the U.S. indeed had beneficiaries.

I'm sure that most redditors on this sub can't possibly believe that idea.

Yes, innocence is lost all the time, with every president. But especially with JFK's assassination.

Yes, JFK's assassination created a precedent of open murder and unchallenged shadow government (including military) supremacy over the democratic system of elections.

Yes, Oswald's assassination established the precedent of presumed guilty without trial using a "Commission" being accepted by the U.S. public.

JFK's assassination was a turning point.

Nixon wasn't in on the JFK assassination, but he knew a fair amount about who was.

Nixon by some accounts was at the Murchison Ranch meeting in 1963 on the night before the JFK assassination, with Dulles, Johnson, Texas oil men & others, if it happened.

Nixon was definitely in Dallas on 11/22/63, giving a speech to Pepsi Co. When asked where he was on the day JFK was shot, Nixon was one of 3 people who could not remember: neither could Bush, nor Richard Helms (who was with RFK when RFK got the news but Helms could not remember this).

Nixon may have been framed for having foreknowledge. Nixon personally protected Jack Ruby during the 1950s when Nixon was VP and Ruby worked for the Chicago Mob as an FBI informant. Nixon's signature was on document protecting Ruby specifically. This document was likely used to select Ruby and/or obtain Nixon's silence, since it would have linked Nixon to Dallas or raised further questions. Smart assassination planners would have recognized the need to silence the leader of the opposing party over a controversial assassination.

If JFK // 9-11, then we should expect to learn of a similar planned strategy for silencing the 2001-era Democratic Party leadership over 9-11. Including Gore, and both Clintons, by implicating their foreknowledge or cooperation or (as with OKC) a similar badjacketing.

The US is still running, on more or less the same lines as it was pre-JFK. The idea that the US somehow lost its innocence with JFK's murder is only believable if you also believe that the US was in any state of "innocence" before it happened

LBJ brought an unprecedented corporatism, a cooperation with corporations, into the Democratic Party, which was previously (since 1933) the opposite.

JFK announced a specific declaration that "We do not want a Pax Americana," the idea [based on Pax Romana] that the U.S. would be the world's police, enforcing a U.S.-based world peace. As recently as this week, Trump is embracing Pax Americana, as did Obama, and Bush/Cheney/PNAC made it the centerpiece of their ideology.

JFK ≠ Pax Americana.

All other Presidents since JFK = supported Pax Americana.

If the reversal of JFK's NSAM-263 by LBJ was part of the coup, or a halt to JFK's "interference" in the U.S. monetary system (or the trajectory thereof) was part of the coup, then the U.S. indeed had beneficiaries.

I'm sure that most redditors on this sub can't possibly believe that idea.

Yes, innocence is lost all the time, with every president. But especially with JFK's assassination.

Yes, JFK's assassination created a precedent of open murder and unchallenged shadow government (including military) supremacy over the democratic system of elections.

Yes, Oswald's assassination established the precedent of presumed guilty without trial using a "Commission" being accepted by the U.S. public.

JFK's assassination was a turning point.

Yeah, I'm aware of all that. I still disagree.

In particular, the stuff about Nixon is really tenuous. The 1947 document that mentions Ruby isn't anything to do with the FBI.

It's a sworn statement to the House Un-American Activities Committee, signed by a Nixon staffer, saying that a Jack Rubenstein of Chicago should not be called to testify to HUAC because he is "performing information functions" for the Nixon team.

Ruby was a notorious "hanger-on" at the edges of the political world. By the time of the JFK assassination, as we know, he was palling it up with Dallas police, ingratiating himself with famous journalists, and involved in some very murky Cuban business that is still not entirely clear.

Really, this boils down to Ruby being a low-life snitch in the immediately post-WWII years, ratting out suspected Commies to gain political brownie points.

Also (limiting ourselves to post-war America) it was HUAC that set the precedent of presumed guilty without a trial well before the Warren Commission existed, with a lengthy toll of FDR-era liberals and Hollywood lefties effectively blacklisted as subversive reds.

Some people still believe the magic bullet theory, and that one lone nut did those incredible shots with that rusty rifle.

Malcom X

Maybe if you would/could tell us who "they" are it would be more obvious to everyone.

Probably the same people who stole food from your ancestors and raided their camps. Now they just in the future.

It started way before Kennedy.

It started on December 23, 1913. Influence grew from the control of the resources and the economy. By 1963 Jewish supremacist control reached such height that 'no' was a death sentence, so he was killed. From them it was an in-the-open hostile takeover of government and remaining financial institutions. Just two years after came the communist civil rights movement (totally grassroots btw) and Hart-Celler act.

All this evil is because Jesus/Lord is a coward narcissist that wants to be worshipped over God while putting zero effort into doing anything remotely fucking capable of actually being worshipped.

So I mean at some point its pretty natural to ask God directly why in the fuck any of us have to put up with the Lord?

I choose God, I choose love, I choose good for my children and myself.

The Lord refuses to do any of those things and instead gets to kidnap, abuse, rape, and murder children the world over?

And my family is forced to deal with this shit, are you fucking kidding me?

They say he’s still tripping to this day

Yeah thats the thing with cowards. They hide, do their cowardice bullshit, and hide some more.

🤷‍♂️

Demiurge be tripping.

He be downvotin too. 🤷‍♂️

Dude the universe is huge, why would you think there is anyone else. Ur just ruled by some other people.

I am ruled only by the principles of the creator of all that huge universe.

However the problem as you rightly described is other “people” keep trying to steal the free will of my children, my family, my country, my planet, and my universe.

Unfortunately for them, after a long trial period, its pretty fucking clear these beings are too scared, too cowardice, and too ignorant to rule their own piles of shit, let alone all the sacred things Listed above.

So again, gotta call out to the BigGuy and say these guys are stupid why do you allow them to do this?

Exactly! JFK & Building 7. Until an evidence based explanation of these events is presented as our history, nothing is true, nothing can be believed.

+1000000 Great post OP I agree

Exactly. I've always thought the same. When you take into account what most of these leaders stood for, or represented, it's clear why they were targeted and killed. Shit, I mean they even got Tupac yo. It's easy to go on twitter or any other social media and say things need to change. But when you start putting action into those thoughts, that's when you cross the line. Honestly, I think the killing off of people who wanted to make change in the world was to keep people in check. To instill fear in us and make us believe we're are less. In a sense I guess. . .

MLK is a communist fraud that is confirmed to have plagiarized everything he did for his doctorate, including his thesis. Cheated on his wife with hookers all the time. FBI only investigated him because of his communist ties. His handlers even met with Mao in China. Even "I have a dream" was plagiarized from Archibald Carey.

We get it, black people can't be smart, the Jews are evil, and immigration is white genocide

In the '60s and '70s TPTB considered there to be a "crisis of democracy", meaning there was a bit too much of it expressing itself in ways that made the status quo uncomfortable and put the FBI onto infiltrating and attempting to shut down every grassroots civil rights and anti-war group they could using patently unconstitutional methods. source: Chomsky's Requiem for the American Dream

Have you seen the picture of LBJ being sworn in a looking gleeful as hell right next to distraught Jackie Kennedy? Maybe someone else can link to it if they know which one I’m talking about.

I've seen some writeups claiming this one's a fake, but tbh they don't provide very good arguments.
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-JWvkR-KWc-g/V7yeQ4HFBOI/AAAAAAABKVQ/_xcz19xev9YTsO0URK1kFwdOPM08VtLhQCLcB/s530/Albert-Thomas-Winks-At-President-Johnson-11-22-63.jpg

being president has a high occupational hazard, 4 presidents killed out of 45 = 9 percent mortality rate. assassination attempts is about 30 percent.

truly a dangerous job which is why some presidents give talks for millions of dollars or embezzle money as compensation /s

Good post I agree. I think an an almost Part 2 of that is the 1-2 punch of Oklahoma City 95, then 911 in 01. Oklahoma City was the initial "terror" starting point then 911 was the closer to move us fully into the "post 911 world" dozens of declarations of living in a "new world" "we will never be the same" "a new war on terror" etc.. Oklahoma City and 911 are both so blatant false flags from the same people who killed JFK, MLK, and RFK

What about the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center?

Excellent point, another smoking gun inside job. NY Times even laid that out during the trial.

Frank Sinatra had the mafia kill JFK because of Marilyn Monroe.

Yeah it's called Israel.

Probably the same people who stole food from your ancestors and raided their camps. Now they just in the future.

How do you stay out of the war after Pearl Harbor?

If you knew what a coup was and had proof I was incorrect you would have pasted proof. "easily asserted can be easily dismissed".

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/coup

a highly successful, unexpected stroke, act, or move; a clever action or accomplishment.

If the media was militarized in 2012 and they're the last branch of the old coup still standing, then they're very much attempting a repeat.