To British people
1 2018-09-06 by betteroffsed
Has the government and the media completely lost it. First of all the anti-semetism “problem” in the Labour Party. Who in their right mind can look back at Corbyns past and say the man is a racist? Criticising the actions of a state does not amount to racism. What is happening to free speech? Should we just watch the extermination of a people and say nothing, is that how the Jewish people were liberated in WW2? just oh they are allowed to have an apartheid state because it’s racism to say otherwise. I just read what amounts to be propaganda in an article from Laura Kuenssberg, just skimming around the truth missing enough to demonise the Labour Party and anyone who dares criticise Israel. Journalism in the uk is dead, it’s rotten corpse on display everyday to see, we no longer have any trust worthy news source just bile spilling over. And then there’s the government accusing Putin and Russia of sanctioning an attack on the uk without any proof in the matter, just mouthing off how guilty Russia are knowing full well none of it will go to court for proof of liability. speculation and pure fabrication damn the accused without rebuttal. Government and press collude to cover our own crimes and demonise our “enemy’s”. They’re all chaff, nothing to be saved, government and media full to bursting with puppet mouth pieces and psychopathic sycophants.
65 comments
1 BaronMoriarty 2018-09-06
Well said
1 cullpeppe 2018-09-06
It is important you realise that your anger has been created by people who you have never met over issues that will likely not affect you personally. The most serious issues that affect your life are kept away from your attention.
​
1) Switch off your Television. Cancel your TV license.
2) Stop reading 'mainstream' media.
3) Determine your priorities, what do you need to survive? What is stealing your mental or physical resources?
4) Examine where you are dependent upon government and work to end that.
5) Buy some books focused on what you want to know.
6) Help others cease their dependency.
​
Lots more, but I think these should help you a little.
1 betteroffsed 2018-09-06
I’m sorry but it seems you are thinking I’m someone else, how condescending. It’s healthy to vent anger now and again.
1 cullpeppe 2018-09-06
You're entertaining fantasy and it is affecting your emotional state.
1 betteroffsed 2018-09-06
So a corrupt government and a controlled willing passive media will never affect me. What world do you live in?
1 thisisgettingworse 2018-09-06
I used to think like him. That if you shut it all off your life would keep on going regardless. The problem is the governments of today are massive and politics intrudes in all aspects of our life.
Gone are the days of 'tune out'. We now live in a world where saying a single phrase can put you in prison. Jobs are only open to people who can correctly walk the fine tightrope of political correctness and use all the correct terminology. Call a bisexual a 'bi' and you'll lose your job. Yesterday's accepted speech is today's hate speech. Switch the media off for a second and you'll miss the next acceptable word that has been banned.
Yeah, you can't ignore it anymore.
1 FreonPurple 2018-09-06
Oh fuck off, he is absolutely right. You must be incredibly naive, I feel bad for you.
1 betteroffsed 2018-09-06
Thanks it’s appreciated, you’ve opened my mind up to what’s going on with your well informed and thought out response. I’ll go and spend a few days contemplating your words of wisdom wise one.
1 FreonPurple 2018-09-06
I was responding to the other guy btw
1 betteroffsed 2018-09-06
Then I whole heartedly agree haha.
1 Cycad 2018-09-06
because... the potential leadership of the country won't affect him directly???
1 Dougalishere 2018-09-06
Just more Tory bullshit... Every time Boris takes a shit or May fucks some other thing up the next day in the paper is more BS about Corbyn the racist/terrorist/commie etc etc etc
​
Jews protesting outside parliment... Have a look at them, a bunch of middle aged guys in 2g a pop suits... Tory votters every single last fkn one of them.
​
Our Tory front bench should all be behind bars, apart from Hunt, he should be put in stocks outside parliment untill he dies.
Corbyn was on the barricades with the rest of us during the 90s while the rest of these Tory cunts were enjoying their private schools.
Won't be long untill our lobbying laws change to reflect the US and the sorry fucking state their politics is in atm.
1 Sabremesh 2018-09-06
The Corbyn/anti-semitism story was absurd, but Corbyn has enemies on both sides - the Conservatives know Corbyn could win the next election for Labour, and they naturally want Labour to have a different leader. But the Parliamentary Labour Party doesn't like Corbyn either - they are vestigial Blairites. They want a different Labour leader too, even though Corbyn is far more likely to win them the next election.
Corbyn's support comes from ordinary Labour Party members and potential voters. Ironically, because Corbyn and Trump are political opposites, both of them rely on grass-roots support, and only receive lukewarm support from their own parties.
1 deadbeatbert 2018-09-06
Corbin’s not a racist, he’s pro terrorist, working with the IRA for decades.
1 betteroffsed 2018-09-06
Said with your daily mail folded under your arm no doubt.
1 taxusbaccata 2018-09-06
Its a well known fact that in Corbyn's parliamentary career he has repeated backed and sided with those who are traditionally against the British state; from Venezuela to Irish republicans to Assad to Galtieri as well as multiple islamic speakers with questionable values. Whilst I don't believe that Corbyn is provably racist he does have a habit of hanging out with actual anti-semtites and constantly gives them a platform.
1 WageSlav3 2018-09-06
I agree taxusbacatta, He likes to fight against oppression and sometimes doesn't do the due diligence with the backgrounds. His heart is in the right place which is about the biggest compliment i can give to a politician.
1 Adamarama 2018-09-06
Isn’t this a good thing? It’s not that he’s anti establishment on principle, he’s anti corruption, anti war, anti oppression, pro freedom, pro self determination, pro ordinary citizens. The reason it seems he’s been anti establishment is because the UK state has been corrupt, violent, oppressive, dishonest etc and he’s been against that.
1 taxusbaccata 2018-09-06
If he was corruption then he wouldn't have constantly praised Venezuela as a example to the world. Surely he knew that Chavez who was president for 14 years (and would have stayed in power if the cancer hadn't gotten him ) and frequently cited as one of the most corrupt regimes on earth and one that got increasingly corrupt as time when on. There is also mass corruption in the Palestinian authority. I mean Arafat literally diverted millions to his own private account a lot of this was money that was fund raised by well meaning supporters like Corbyn. His priciples on corruption only seem to be vocalized when it is Israel or Trump but very rarely when it is those he supports. As we all know having double standards is akin to having no standards at all and therefore Corbyn can't be described as being anti-corruption but merely anti-western corruption.
The UK state is 'corrupt, violent, oppressive, dishonest ' but lets not pretend that the Islamic, IRA, Venezuela, Argentinean and palestinian authorties aren't also. One can't pretend to be against one but not the others. Corbyn is seletively outragged but certain crimes but happy to make excuses and shy away from criticizing other if it isn't politically advantageous for him. Politicians are in general professional liars, Corbyn is no different, don't fool for his facade of good intentions.
Also Corbyn can't be in anyway described as pro-freedom he frequently calls for more restrictions against freedom of speech under the guise of hate-speech laws, which are open to interpretation. He is also pro-big government, property seizure and despite being a massive rebel even within his own party he is being ironically dictatorial in his own management of the party, with ministers resigning after Corbyn tried to impose a whip on his MPs.
Him being pro-self determination didn't seem to extend to the people of Northern ireland when he repeated called for british troop withdrawal from our own territory which is majority pro-union or the Falkland islands when he argued against UK intervention (again our own people). Seems that is priciples for self determination don't extend past the people of the west bank and certainly not to the citizens of the UK.
1 deadbeatbert 2018-09-06
Independent reader, actually. The Daily Fail can suck all of it.
I’m an ex-British army though, so Corbyn’s actions are going to stick with me, mate. I don’t disagree with everything he does, but I can’t stand by a man who stands with terrorists who have literally targeted my fellow countrymen in my lifetime.
1 betteroffsed 2018-09-06
Please provide sources for your accusations. I’m still yet to see anything that’s not laughable. That Corbyn talked with the ira is not sufficient evidence, a peace process has to start somewhere, Yea I jumped to conclusions and I apologise,it’s just the terrorist Corbyn fairy tails are so farcical at this point!
1 deadbeatbert 2018-09-06
Apology gladly accepted, mate. I’m not here to bicker and argue, just to discuss as openly as I can.
Here’s a decent over view from Channel 4 in 2017 that lays out the rough history.
https://www.channel4.com/news/factcheck/factcheck-corbyn-on-northern-ireland
He also attended events to commemorate IRA ‘achievements’, the most commonly known one being in ‘88 after four British soldiers were killed by the IRA in Holland. He attended these events for seven years. It is also possible he edited a commemoration programmer that mocked the Conservatives killed and injured in the Brighton bombings.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/mi5-jeremy-corbyn-files-kept-ira-sympathies-a7745966.html
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/Jeremy_Corbyn/11924431/Revealed-Jeremy-Corbyn-and-John-McDonnells-close-IRA-links.html
I am neither pro or anti royalist. I understand completely how much of a giant fustercluck the whole Irish thing is and that while political communication is and was important to the peace process Jeremy Corbyn voted against the Anglo Irish Agreement in 1985. He also obscures, gives half answers and sometimes just ignores questions on his past involvement with Sinn Fein and the IRA, which leads me to believe he is absolutely hiding his real thoughts and opinions on the subject.
But at the end of the day it all comes down to what you discern as a credible source. If you don’t view the MI5, Channel 4, the Independent or Telegraph as credible you’ll have to tell me who is a credible source and we can go from there.
1 deadbeatbert 2018-09-06
Also I’ll tell you as much as I can about my service without breaching the OSA.
July ‘97 - Nov ‘01 Royal Artillery, part of my work was liaison to intelligence on a forward observation post (radios, observation etc) with 3 months NI training near Salisbury, Lydd and Hythe, Kent and 3 weeks near Newcastle helping our sister regiment prepare for their tour, teaching and acting as a terrorist in training scenarios (Recon formations, QRF mobilisation and so on.).
1 Apolitical_Corrector 2018-09-06
Well then you had better reexamine the Zionist bastards that are behind the defamation and destruction of Corbyn and Labor.
The King David Hotel Bombing* was the single deadliest terrorist attack ever carried out in Palestine/ Israeli, killing 91, and injuring scores of others.
The target was British Military Headquarters, housed in that hotel during the British Mandate period -- you know, when the Brits were HELPING the Zionists to establish their "Jewish Homeland" pursuant to promises made, under duress, in the Balfour Declaration nearly three decades previous.
Tan is to the (sometimes reluctant) help of the British, Zionists had finally established a firm foothold in Palestine, and, and thanks to the massive influx of Jews fleeing the horrors of the Holocaust, the finally had the population base of Jews needed to launch the Jewish State that the Zionists had been working tirelessly to achieve co 50 years.
With WW2 ending, Zionists were ready to make their move, and the Brits, on whose good graces they had been so utterly dependent, had outlived their usefulness: They fully intended to launch a "blitzkrieg", snatching as much territory as possible, while simultaneously driving their Arab neighbors out of the area.
The Zionists knew that British would not stand for this, so they had to go, the sooner the better.
It is said that the bombing plot was hatched by Irgun, an outlawed criminal gang of Zionist terrorists whose leaders were being sought for arrest by the controlling British authorities (though it certain that Ben Gurion and other Zionist leaders were in agreement with the *motives of the bombing, if not the act itself)*.
You can read the grisly details of the act at the link provided above (bearing in mind that the "history" of the event has been whitewashed to minimize this vicious act of treachery, and the callousness of its perpetrators).
The criminal mastermind behind this deadliest act of terror was one Menachem Begin, leader of the Irgun terrorist group.
His identity was known, and his actions were never denied -- indeed, he was "punished" for this crime by being elected Prime Minister of Israel in 1977.
As for Irgun, the Terrorist Organization he headed, well, they became a "respectable" political party in the fledgling Zionist State, where their political descendants remain highly active to this day... but they changed their name, of course...
These days they are called the Likud Party, and their most prominent member is Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu -- whose ruthless policies and acts of terrorism against non-Jews surely surpass those of his bespectacled forebearer, Menachem Begin.
The primary difference being that when Netanyahu acts, he does so under the "color of law", with the official consent of the Zionist Government, and presumably, its (Jewish) citizens and foreign supporters -- in Britain, the US, France, etc.
So while I applaud you for your service to your country, and for your opposition to "terrorists", I hope that you realize that there are others who are working feverishly to undermine, by whatever means at their disposal, the foundations of YOUR society in pursuit of their own particular interests... and that this tiny, strident and POLITICALLY TERRORISTIC minority is as unconcerned with the well-being of the British People as Menachem Begin and Irvin were with the "well-being" of the British Leaders in the King David Hotel in 1946.
Interestingly, these same Political Terrorists would like to make it a CRIME for anyone to publicly recount the history that I have written above (if they haven't already pushed through such laws in Britain)
Can you blame them?
1 deadbeatbert 2018-09-06
I didn’t say much about the anti-semitism charges because I’ve been living the US for the last 13 years. I’m simply not well informed and unqualified to give an opinion. So it’s not a re-examination, but it will be initial one. I’ll look into the bombing you mention and educate myself independently as I always do with as little bias and prejudice (we’re only human) as I can.
I’m guessing that Irgun was I their side of the Arafat coin, who was trained by the brilliantly terrifying Nazi commando Otto Skorzeny, and I’ll look into that, too.
Thanks apolitical, it’s not often that I get a chance to expand my knowledge of post war military history, especially via the conspiracy sub.
1 Apolitical_Corrector 2018-09-06
Thank you for taking the time to read, and for your willingness to take what I wrote into consideration. "Political sensitivities" would cause many people to reject that bit of history out of hand.
Understand that, to Zionists, the destruction and defeat of Corbyn and Labour is extremely important: Britain is one of the Five Permanent Members of the UN Security Council -- and as such, it holds VETO power in that body.
Corbyn is being attacked because, they allege, he is "anti-Semitic", but what does that mean, from the Zionist perspective?
It means that he is NOT TRUSTED to be pro-Zionist, that they fear that they will NOT be able to CONTROL him, and to bribe/ coerce him into serving Zionist interests, especially when said interests contradict the interests of the British People.
Zionists are well aware of such perils, and they go to great lengths to ENSURE that only those they CAN control are elected to leadership positions in "countries that matter" -- the US, Britain, France, etc.
In Britain, Jews comprise a tiny minority: ~0.5% of the population, but as in the US and France, Canada, Australia, etc., their collective wealth, in-group cohesiveness and political influence makes them an extremely powerful minority. Indeed, there is NO other group that can be compared.
The unique history and tribalist/ familial nature of the Jewish people has resulted in an in-group (us vs them) mindset that is remarkably persistent: it has spanned centuries and blurred the lines of political states for countless generations. With rare exception, their genetic/ tribal identity trumps any loyalty to country or sovereign in the nation where they happen to live -- and in most cases, their priorities become readily apparent when the interests of The Tribe conflict with those of the political state where they happen to abide.
Indeed, had we the courage to be honest and forthright in our speech, we might be inclined to call their Tribalist behavior "Semitism" (a predisposition favorable to Jews/ Jewish interests); conversely, one might be inclined to view anyone who is NOT predisposed to favor Jewish interests (above all others) as anti-Semitic, no?
When we cut through the layers of Political Correctness... of genteel niceties and polite courtesies, that is the PRECISE DE FACTO DEFINITION of "anti-Semitism": The failure to hold the interests of Jews, as a Tribe, as one's highest priority -- the interests of any other* group notwithstanding.
Please notice my emphasis on the term "DE FACTO" above -- this is important because, though these demands are rarely spoken (God forbid!), they are a powerfully decisive element that COMMANDS ATTENTION in the real world of politics, in the media, and in daily life -- and those who fail to adhere to these "unspoken demands" are likely to find themselves as an unhappy target of the WRATH of those they Have "offended" -- whether wittingly or unwittingly.
Such is the plight of Jeremy Corbyn, and of George Galloway, and of Cynthia McKinney and James Traficant, and many others whose lives, careers and political/ moral ambitions led them to fall in the crosshairs of these "untouchables".
Now, lest I be accused of painting with an overly-broad brush, accused of "anti-Semitism" (again... Surprise!), I should note that I do NOT call out every person of Jewish heritage as a participant in this pattern of behavior, rather, I speak in GENERALITIES, focusing NOT on individuals, but on the overall proclivities of THE GROUP (are we allowed to do that? Or is this a right they have reserved to themselves exclusively?)
Perhaps a better term to invoke would be Semitists: Jewish Supremacists? But as that term is not presently "in vogue", it might be more apropos to call them "Zionists", though in reality, the terms are synonymous.
So then, who are these people? This hypersensitive, hyper-vocal and hypocritical minority who are obsessed with meddling in the affairs and perverting the interests of countries to which their "loyalties" are provisional AND conditional -- and yet who wield such disproportionate influence over the fates of those who, in their heart of hearts, they Reject as "strangers"?
Whoever they are, I, for one, wish them well... But NOT at the expense and to the detriment of the rest of humanity.
In modern times, such specimens of Cultish Tribalism have become a liability and a threat to humanity as a whole.
It's time we evolved beyond such mindsets. Failure to do so may be catastrophic.
Good evening.
1 FreonPurple 2018-09-06
You're certainly not the only one who feels this way.
1 inertiatic_ESP 2018-09-06
im embarrassed to be british, this country is a joke with absolutely nothing to offer anymore except disappointment and poverty
1 TinyZoro 2018-09-06
Suspense?
1 Ade_93 2018-09-06
two things for the price of one.
1 WangKur 2018-09-06
It's all a distraction.
1 LeftOfTheDials 2018-09-06
Please read a book called A Very British Coup, it was written by a Labour MP in the 80s and describes EXACTLY what is happening to Corbyn.
Agree on your points though it feels the country has gone bat shit insane since Brexit.
1 Cycad 2018-09-06
The Corbyn monstering is shameless. The flagship UK news programme is BBC Radio 4's morning Today programme and they lead on it almost every. Single. Morning. If it weren't so sad it would be funny.
1 a1s2d3f4g5t 2018-09-06
I approve of turning monster into a verb.
To Monster Someone is now a part of my vocabulary.
Have anb upvote.
1 Apolitical_Corrector 2018-09-06
I second that approval.
So the question before us is: Can Jeremy Corbyn be "de-monstrated"?
Will mass public "de-monstrations" reverse the actions of the pernicious "monstrators"?
1 arnkk 2018-09-06
(also iirc "beasting" is a british military term, think used when training new recruits)
1 Cycad 2018-09-06
Thank you! Although I can't claim to have invented using it as a verb.
Anyway my alarm has just woken me up and, hilariously, the Today crew are back monstering Corbyn on Radio 4.
1 Ashman901 2018-09-06
Ever since the Brexit vote the UK has been falling apart. Granted where I live it had been growing since before Brexit, but after the vote no one seemed to care. The economy is... well steadily declining from all the graphs I have seen. Not many investors investing, House prices keep climbing, but people cant afford them, etc. Every single news source seems to spout the same nonsense, one day backing Labour the next Conservative. The thing with the Russians is also ridiculous.
1 betteroffsed 2018-09-06
But we are more prosperous now than we’ve ever been, it’s got to be true because pierce Morgan said it on that bastion of truth and balanced reporting good morning Britain!
1 Ashman901 2018-09-06
The data does say otherwise... however that also probably a lie as its published on news sites. Can't trust those graphs, anyone could of made them.
1 Cunty_Balls 2018-09-06
Good morning Britain isn't a news programme, it's tabloid gossip and doesn't claim to be anything else.
1 betteroffsed 2018-09-06
It’s still fucking disgraceful.
1 Cunty_Balls 2018-09-06
I'm a conservative ( not the party ) and I agree.
1 WageSlav3 2018-09-06
I agree 100% - Israeli influence in our Govt is nearly as bad as the USA. We have pressure groups called Conservative/Labour friends of Israel involving current ministers!
In alphabetical order, members of Conservative Friends of Israel include: Theresa May PM Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom. Graham Brady MP. Alistair Burt MP. David Cameron. James Clappison. Stephen Crabb MP - CFI's Parliamentary Chairman in the House of Commons, 2017. Iain Duncan-Smith MP. Liam Fox MP.
1 Vladie 2018-09-06
It's nuts mate, feels like we're in a twilight zone and I'm very concerned that these narratives are leading somewhere disastrous. When will the next 'Russian backed' chemical (or any other) attack be, either in Syria or in the UK? Hopefully they've achieved what they wanted but I suspect we will see more events that convince the masses of the great Russian threat to world peace. Imagine a war with Russia? People surely won't sleepwalk into something that bad will they? They'll surely doubt what the news tells them before it gets too bad... At least I hope so. It's quite revealing who are and aren't establishment stooges when you see media talking heads automatically parroting the British state line without question, just like they did in the run up to Iraq and other state deceptions.
1 Pidjesus 2018-09-06
Watch Al Jazeera's Jewish British lobby doc, they do what they can to destroy anyone who gets in their way
1 T-D-S 2018-09-06
when he gets a visit from the security services ( mi5 ) in the morning and then comes out and says something you can be dam well sure there's fuckery afoot
1 TennisTipster 2018-09-06
this is a honeypot thread put forward by leading hands in the british communalism movement
1 ruscobean 2018-09-06
QAnon #WWG1WGA r/greatawakening The world is watching. THE WORLD IS CHANGING!
1 orashel 2018-09-06
Israel is an ethnostate of the Jewish race. Not religion. They do genetic tests for it. Once you understand this, you will understand why criticizing them is racist.
1 betteroffsed 2018-09-06
So that makes it ok to constantly maim and murder Palestinians?
1 Cunty_Balls 2018-09-06
And if you take you're head out of your arse, you might realise that you're a moron. Then again, maybe not.
1 orashel 2018-09-06
Wow, an insult. How will i ever recover from this? You insulting me makes what i said automatically incorrect and invalid. Damn you're good.
1 Cunty_Balls 2018-09-06
No, being incorrect and invalid makes what you said incorrect and invalid.
1 Adamarama 2018-09-06
This implies that you can’t criticise anyone without being racist because everyone belongs to a race and as a representative of your race, any critique of your behaviour amounts to unfair criticism of everyone of the same race as you. But that’s a load of bullshit, everyone is accountable for their actions. States even more so because of the power they wield. A country doesn’t just get to do what it wants because it’s an ethnostate that is fucking ridiculous.
1 Cunty_Balls 2018-09-06
Corbyn is anti establishment, this is why he's being hammered.
1 betteroffsed 2018-09-06
Well obviously
1 arnkk 2018-09-06
plus afaik we're the world's testing ground for a surveillance state, we're spied on more than anywhere else.
1 thisisgettingworse 2018-09-06
It doesnt matter what you or I or we think, as 4chan recently exposed and what you may not be aware of is the fact that only 30% of people have an inner voice. Think about that. 7 out of 10 people have no language based inner dialogue. They are literal NPCs.
The government know they only need tell this majority of non thinkers something and they will believe it as true. If you say something that goes against this belief they have been programmed to react aggressively towards you.
We know this Russian poisoning case is using bullshit as evidence. The government are rubbing our noses in it by making it so obvious, whilst showing us theyve got the majority firmly under control.
You cant redpill people who don't think! 70% of the population are 90 IQ or lower, they have no language based inner dialogue and cannot even internally visualise. The only time they can is when they have extreme emotions, and even then its only an internal dialogue that looks like this "fucking cunt, fucking saying that, I'll fucking tear his fucking throat out, fucking cunt bastard, shit'.....
They run almost entirely on reptile brain. Most people are reptiles in human skin. If they are told to kill you, they will.
We are fucked mate.
1 Adamarama 2018-09-06
What do you mean 70% don’t think or have an inner voice? Where’s that stat cone from? I find it hard to believe. How has this been established?
1 Raven9nine9 2018-09-06
What happened is the zionist takeover of the British mainstream media and their infiltration of Britain's mainstream political parties. They have redefined racism to stifle those who criticise, object or question what they do and the brainwashed masses just go along with it.
1 swordofdamocles42 2018-09-06
what started this whole anti semite thing please... was it the murial thing or was it something else?
1 Adamarama 2018-09-06
As far as I can tell, it was started when Labour started pulling ahead in the polls. It’s not an organic thing, it’s people trying to find stuff they can use against Corbyn. Because he’s anti-Israeli policy wrt Palestine, it gives them a way of trying to pretend it’s Antisemitism to try and ruin him and get rid of him, because he wants to tighten tax avoidance laws, investigate panama papers, force MPs to declare offshore trusts etc.
1 MrJDouble 2018-09-06
Not from there so I dont know the specifics, but sounds like this is a case of people in power using the media for political purposes rather than to delivery actual news, which has happened since the beginning of time. Only difference now is there is no beacon of truth and one to check them or call them on their bullshit.
1 betteroffsed 2018-09-06
So that makes it ok to constantly maim and murder Palestinians?
1 Cunty_Balls 2018-09-06
And if you take you're head out of your arse, you might realise that you're a moron. Then again, maybe not.
1 betteroffsed 2018-09-06
It’s still fucking disgraceful.
1 Cunty_Balls 2018-09-06
I'm a conservative ( not the party ) and I agree.
1 Adamarama 2018-09-06
This implies that you can’t criticise anyone without being racist because everyone belongs to a race and as a representative of your race, any critique of your behaviour amounts to unfair criticism of everyone of the same race as you. But that’s a load of bullshit, everyone is accountable for their actions. States even more so because of the power they wield. A country doesn’t just get to do what it wants because it’s an ethnostate that is fucking ridiculous.