Do think that's a good way to make a point on the conspiracy sub, citing an article written by a Rothschild?
Anyways I looked at it and the predictions for November arrests were wrong so two things I wonder before complete dismissal. How are 4chan Q posts verified to actually be Q? 8chan posting didn't start until May this year. And, what are the chances that Q has forecasted events but circumstances changed, making the forecasts based on intel incorrect?
Yeah guys can't you see Trump is catching all the pedos and reptiles and putting them in prison and the double fist pump is him too happy to contain that he's got Hilary and Obama locked up and Democrats got caught colluding with Russia and and Soros he's in this too. And the science community are actually overblowing climate change, thats all funded by the cabal and Trump knows this. Didn't you see the Q drop of a picture of a TV remote that's because Trump isn't watching news all day he's actually on the phone and the tv drowns out his call he's closer to convicting all the deep state than you think. Etc etc etc etc
No I'm talking about how he expressly dated and predicted that Podesta and Hillary would be indicted/arrested. Example. This never happened. It's now been two years since this drop and nothing.
Unfortunately. I have no doubt that the people who see the world somewhat clearly will be the ones to realize that it is falling apart. It's much easier to live in a controlled delusion.
Honest question, in the goal of GA, why is declas taking so long? Why would anything need to be redacted in order to push a story? Shouldn't it be possible to just immediately put everything into the open?
Seems like a slow drip process. Kinda like boiling a frog. You and me are ready to see the massive amount of corruption from day one. Dont think others are. I believe trump has played his cards right and now alot of normies are ready for the truth about fisa gate. I think ittle come out this month. Its time.
Anything less than complete submission to their desires will "prove" to these kinds of people that they are right and that their enemies are at fault. Same old song and dance with supremacists/cultists of every flavour.
It's funny that society is so inverted right now that you have people cheering on censorship and being happy that anyone questioning that is censored. You're calling them a cult but you're rah rah rahing the suppression of ideas in favor of mass censorship by large companies.
https://i.imgur.com/aZWnEAx.jpg
That's a screenshot of the actual subreddit that's getting others banned. You can argue whatever you want to pro this. But in the long run it's clear what's happening. Which do you think is "the good guy" in your eyes? I know you'll side with the totalitarian approach...
I totally agree. If its nonsense, why give it so much attention? Bill cooper called it when he said theyd have people begging to take our freedoms away. Fucking idiots.
Lead them astray?? Then why is /politics allowed as well as this page.
Trump isn't a savior, but he is trying to take down the Deep State. Sad you can't get on board with that...Look at all the resignations, firings, sex trafficking/pedophile arrests that have happened since DT took office.
To take down the DS you have to have people close to you that were in it and or still are. Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.
Where's ISIS these days?
SA situation is tricky, but their old strings have been cut
Yes, he wants a strong military not one that is depleted.
The biggest trick the devil plays is to make you think he doesn't exist. The GA was about fighting against this evil. Now it's banned. Nice trick but we who support DT and Q aren't falling for it.
Being rich and having a TV show (one that gives people a job within his company) doesn't make him Elite. He has been vocal since the 80s on the direction our country was heading.
The Elite want a one world government and are against patriotism.
Trump loves America and is against everything the Elite stand for.
The Elite Establishment hate him and so do you...The elite appreciate you on their team.
Lol oh boy, you're actually saying that about the guy who lives in a golden tower with his name on the side and tweets from a golden toilet in the morning.
I don't think I'll be able to find someone that can top that naivety
He was rich and his company was named after him.
But you are saying he is elite because of that. So let's use another word because I see the confusion there. Instead of Elite I will say Deep State Cabal.
Because that's who I was referring too.
Like seriously. You think the guy trying to slob on Putin's knob is doing anything to fight corruption or organized crime? Motherfucker the Russian mob is the Russian government! The Russian mob is also one of the largest human trafficking operations on the planet, so that alone should show you how off base this whole thing is.
Mark my words. The only reason trump would interfere with human trafficking is to get a cut of the action.
It's totally normal for the entire mainstream media, even pro-Trump MAGA supporters and conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones, to organize attack pieces costing millions of dollars on a conspiracy theory, just like they did with Pizzagate and Pedogate (both of which are TOTALLY untrue, as we know), because they just altruistically want to inform us to the dangers of believing those bloodthirsty LARPers!***
***If you believe this, you're an idiot and don't belong here
If universal agreement that something is stupid is proof it's true then you should go spam your cock in a door, everyone says it's stupid so they MUST be hiding something!
LMFAO nice, an appeal to the crowd AND . And you nailed it - when both sides of the establishment and obvious shills like Jones are universally attacking ONE thing just to stop people from looking into it, you can bet your ass they're very scared of it, brainlet. Nothing is an accident in politics, and coincidences don't exist when it comes to stuff at this level.
That's your response? To launch into a personal insult then attempt to deflect? What he posted is pretty bad, I'm sure you can back your side of it up and show me the language you speak of.
What’s scary about this is “they” could pepper this sub with this behavior and get it banned. And lots of other subs, I presume. I think 70% of you are dicks/douchebags but I love this sub!
Se, that's the thing, though. The Q people want the military, who ostensibly just staged a coup of what Q says is true (which also means Q supporters are unpatriotic coup supporters...) - they want the military, the military which has staged a coup and overthrown the actual government of the USA, to try and convict and hang political leaders they don't like.
they want the military, the military which has staged a coup and overthrown the actual government of the USA, to try and convict and hang political leaders they don't like.
No. We want anyone who can legally do so to try and convict and hang anyone who actually commits treason. That's not "calling for violence" it's calling for justice.
Should any sub where someone calls for executing Trump also be banned? If I go to /r/politics and call for Trump to be executed, should it be banned too?
Speaking of damage control, why is there a sudden influx of accounts with no posting history waking up to defend the banned subreddits? Just look through some of the accounts in this thread. Several accounts with no history in Conspiracy or GreatAwakening all making very similar claims. It seems like someone has activated a bunch of their sockpuppet accounts to try to control the narrative in this thread.
Because when the sub is banned all the posts on great awakening are also deleted. All of mine went away. A lot of people made accounts and had only ever posted on great awakening, hence they now have no post history.
Ah, that might be a part of it. I'm sure that's the case with a few of them. But there a couple that had almost no karma at all, so I don't think they had posting in one of the banned subs for months/years. I also noticed two accounts yesterday that just started posting for the first time after 8 months and 5 years of inactivity.
Nope, I'm specifically referring to these accounts with little or no post/comment history, no karma, and large gaps between activation and their first posts. I've had a feel people point out that comments in banned subs won't show up in their history so that might explain some of these accounts, but I had already tagged a few yesterday before any of these bans took place.
The shills are out we must be! Jesus Christ. I remember 4chan when CBTS was the board then toxic bakers, namefags and other assorted folks came out of the woodwork - THEN the bot wars - holy shit the bots responded to each other and even recognized text in memes. That was when Mein Kampf spammer and the Canadian baker went to war.
It was SO MUCH FUN!
It's sad. They are simply destroying themselves. Eventually if this continues, the majority of people will leave anyway, Reddit will lose profits and the end result will be a echo-chamber platform, filled with bots and corporate shills, where you won't really be able to find any interesting opinions. The sheer variety of opinions, not matter how controversial was what always made Reddit so interesting.
They are shooting themselves in the head.
On the other hand, if we look at it more from a conspiratorial point of view, perhaps someone is simply forcing their hand and they really have no option other than to shoot themselves in the head.
People like you will eventually come to wherever the rest of us go, it always happens that way. Just like you followed us from Digg to Reddit. I really wish you wouldn't, though.
Wtf does that even mean? That someone called a result before verification? That would be you in this situation predicting the imminent and immediate collapse of an extremely popular website because the admins are protecting the company from the fallout that inevitably comes from toxic communities.
I absolutely agree with that argument. Where did I say otherwise? I just think Reddit is Digging itself. When the mods and admins look for creative ways and streeeeetch the TOS to ban users, values are misaligned.
voat was always a half-assed site. the main admin usually checks 1-2 times every 48 hours with no alerting. it regularly crashes because of (no disk space) or some nonsense
I remember I would click a link and be taken into the middle of a conversation on 8ch before. Now I’m at something like a table of contents and don’t even, know where, to begin!
What rules could they have possibly broken? They stayed confined to their sub entirely, never advocated for brigade government, and were very clear that they had no racist opinions (patriots don’t have a skin color ideas). I really wonder what the justification was.
That account is also only four months old and has never posted here or to any of the GreatAwakening subs before now either. There are actually quite a few of these accounts waking up from months of silence to suddenly be outraged.
They exposed themselves. I'm going to miss it. A place where basement dwelling unlaunched youth could mingle with their overmedicated shut-in boomer parents.
They are just banning those subs to make all the incels think they were on to something and feel validated.
Reddit is just a tool now like everything else.
If they are wrong then please explain the massive efforts by msm, social media, and other major outlets to censor the information that they are bringing to light. All for a larp? All for a conspiracy? If it wasn’t for the media reporting on it, the number of followers would be half of what it is rn.
None were broken, i was a mod there for a second. Moderation was SUPER STRICT about any calls for violence. Posts were immediately taken down once reported. And that was maybe a handful of posts a week that were basically "X should hang"...i never saw anything more than that
I agree. If those few statements were enough to warrant a ban, there’s numerous left leaning subs that should be banned for calling for Trump to be put to death. You’ve over target.
And what will that do? We know damn well that these subs aren’t being banned for inciting violence, and reporting those comments to the admins won’t do shit. They want you to think you’re in a minority. They want you to think you’re alone in your beliefs. They want you to think that everyone is against you, and you’re wrong for thinking any differently than them. They don’t want you to know just how many people there are that oppose their bullshit. They want to make sure your voice is unheard, and even though I don’t want to see this happen, there’s only one way this ends.
it does do something, i was notified today by the admins that a number of people were banned that i reported last week. If they want to play this game, so can we.
What made them cancerous? They stayed to themselves for the most part. Why does reddit not only allow, but seem to encourage other kinds of “insanity”? When did we decide it’s ok for these major social networks to decide who does and who doesn’t get a platform?
Please, post your results. I frequent a few lefty subs and I can't recall ever seeing someone call for Trump to hang (unless it's the logical conclusion after a trial for treason), so I'd be really interested in seeing that. I'll even help you report it, because I think that kind of stuff is fucked up.
if mods have to be super strict about calls for violence in a sub and are constantly taking them down, then maybe just maybe that's not the kind of sub that reddit wants to host. just a thought.
Yes never. There were never any calls to violence. there were talks of military tribunals or detention of the people that you mention but never anything about lynching, or a civil war, or a call to arms you're making that shit up
reason given seems to be "inciting violence"... very reminiscent of /r/pizzagate which had a influx of brand new accounts calling for public lynchings on the day it was banned, I'd be interested to see if this was the same
never paid much attention to all this Q bollocks before but all this does is give them more credibility
There was a debacle a few weeks back where they (down to the mods, supposedly) zeroed in on brigading a "satanic" satire account on Twitter. Plenty of threats, pictures of houses under reticules, statements to "you think you won't but you're totally gonna get it"-type sentiments and whatnot.
Same here. Visited there all the time. Got on Reddit to see what was happening there. Never heard of or saw that.
I think one of the issues with Reddit is any malicious group could do that in another sub. And instead of just banning the participants, Reddit bans the sub.
That's exactly what happened. I knew the sub was in trouble with all the "new" traffic that was showing up recently. Fake accounts making bullshit posts that would be taken at face value and used to shut it down. It worked.
It’s up to mods to ban and remove comments like that. If mods are unable to operate a sub in a way that adheres to the tos they should expect the subs removal.
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
"Without advance notice and at any time, we may, for violations of this agreement or for any other reason we choose: (1) suspend your access to reddit, (2) suspend or terminate Your Account or reddit gold membership, and/or (3) remove any of your User Content from reddit."
When you sign up you agree to these terms so I think your lawsuit would be dead in the water. Start a gofundme and challenge them anyway would be intersting to watch unfold.
You can write "I will not allow blacks to enter my apartment" into a lease, but that doesn't make it enforceable. And censoring political opinions you like is probably not an allowable reason.
And censoring political opinions you like is probably not an allowable reason.
In the vast majority of states it is.
Race/ethnicity, Religion, Sex/Gender and Age apply nationwide in the US thanks to the Civil Rights Act. Citizenship, Pregnancy and Veterans are other protected classes which apply in the entire US thanks to other acts.
Political opinions are only protected at a state level.
There are exceptions such as companies trying to restrict free speech when they have a monopoly on the area where the speech occurs:
Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501 (1946), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court, in which it ruled that a state trespassing statute could not be used to prevent the distribution of religious materials on a town's sidewalk, even though the sidewalk was part of a privately owned company town. The Court based its ruling on the provisions of the First Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment.
And you also have things like misrepresentation in contract law, which makes it a breach of contract for one party to make false representations to cause people to enter a contract. Reddit claims to be a place where you can say whatever you want as long as you follow the rules. If they actually ban anyone who expresses opinions you don't like, they breached the contract with their users and could be forced to stop doing that, pay users the value of the content they submitted under the false representation, etc.
Race is a protected class. Political belief is not.
While you are generaly right that EULA and Terms of service are not easily enforceable, it's almost impossible that a court will rule you in your favour if you can't show damages. And even then you would just be compensated. You still wouldn't regain access.
Holy fuck. You want to sue reddit because they shut down your cuckoo clock? Better call Saul... oh, wait. I’m pretty sure you WOULDNT call anyone named Saul...
Is there any precedent of someone in a position similar to yours suing and winning?
There are some cases out there, I haven't seen any very similar to an unjust enrichment claim against a social media site for concealing/misrepresenting the fact that they ban certain viewpoints, or demanding that they stop censoring certain viewpoints under the 1st Amendment because they control the place where political speech occurs.
That's not how the 1st amendment works. It prevents you from Government retaliation. People and private companies are allowed to tell you to fuck off their service and as long as their EULA allows it (which the EULA does) they can ban you for it.
I can't tell if you're trolling or not but just in case you're not I figured I'd give you a crash course in the first amendment.
Did you actually read why they ruled that way? It was because it was restricting Marsh's right to free speech. You are more than welcome to post your crazy ass opinions anywhere on the internet just not here. Your rights are not being restricted. You are just told you can't post them here. Same as a store kicking out protesters. You can protest outside the store just not in it.
I don’t need to have passed the bar to know that you’re not going to do a fucking thing. You’re gonna piss and moan on the internet about how you’ve been wronged, but you’re not gonna do a fucking thing. Your shit ass sub is gone, and you’re butthurt. You’re not even going to call a lawyer.
Think about law [and] order
Why did Elliott leave?
Think [Dick] Wolf
(((867))) = 5309
Think Jenny
Where we go one, we get mocked for our batshit crazy posts.
Is this where I should misquote you saying “Nope, there’s no legal ground for me to stand on, and I’m never going to be able to back up my bullshit claim”?
Your Marsh V Alabama case has nothing to do with political belief. It's 50% about religious belief which IS a protected class and 50% about first amendment. Also, if it was an attempt to play the "private company and first amendment rights" card, you should have used the latest case of Lloyd Corp V Tanner, which, shocker, rules that they can infringe on your right of expression.
But You didn't circulate that case with .jpgs on Great Awakening because it's against what you think its correct, right?
Regarding damages, please read what damages are. Its not a random buzz word, it has a legal meaning. Your example is a joke. Who are you to demand that the money person X paid to Reddit for ad revenue is to be returned? Did YOU, as theCIAcellsDrugs had any damages? Have you had any contract with Reddit regarding ad revenue that results from your "effort"? If not, then there is no case.
Seriously, its the second time this month I reply to you because you downgrade law to emotions. You might want to consult a lawyer if you really believe that is a legal issue instead of just trolling in an echo chamber for feel-good points.
First of all, don't mouth off when you don't know jack shit about the law.
Your Marsh V Alabama case has nothing to do with political belief. It's 50% about religious belief which IS a protected class and 50% about first amendment.
No, it isn't. The words "protected class" don't appear anywhere in the case. You made that up. So, we've established that you're insulting me and you have literally no clue what you're even talking about. The actual court case (did you read it before you started talking shit?) rejects the claimed right to discriminate because:
The more an owner, for his advantage, opens up his property for use by the public in general, the more do his rights become circumscribed by the statutory and constitutional rights of those who use it.
Lloyd said you can't hand out leaflets in a mall. A mall is in the business of selling goods. Completely different situation. Reddit is selling you the promise of a speech platform. Speech is their entire business.
Regarding damages, please read what damages are. Its not a random buzz word, it has a legal meaning. Your example is a joke. Who are you to demand that the money person X paid to Reddit for ad revenue is to be returned?
Still mouthy. Still wrong. Crack a basic legal dictionary and find the word "restitution"
In civil cases: A remedy associated with unjust enrichment in which the amount of recovery is typically based on the defendant's gain rather than the plaintiff's loss.
What's that you say? You can recover damages when a party breaches a contract that are based on the other party's gain without your own loss? u/Etoiles_mortant was insulting people when they didn't understand basic concepts in contract law? Even after being given sources to correct their prior incoherent rambling?
I won't even bother to answer fully. A case about JW on a corporate town has nothing to do with religion as a protected class? Lloyd is about leaflets when the test employed was "can they perform their right of expression nearby"? Civic unjust enrichment without contract? I don't know which joke is bigger.
Please go ahead and sue. You have a slam-dunk case. Call a lawyer now. It's free money. Why you are not taking your millions?
Let us know how the phone call will go. We need a laugh.
A case about JW on a corporate town has nothing to do with religion as a protected class?
Yeah. That's why the court didn't mention "protected class." You seem to be thinking of protected forms of speech, which is a totally different concept. One focuses on the person discriminated against, the other focuses on the type of speech prohibited.
These are very basic constitutional law concepts that I learned in high school civics class. The fact that you don't know these things and are still mouthing off about it is simply childish.
Please go ahead and sue. You have a slam-dunk case. Call a lawyer now. It's free money. Why you are not taking your millions?
Do you literally believe that I'm not allowed to talk about how the law works unless I plan to go file a lawsuit tomorrow morning? It sounds like you actually believe that.
Again you are wrong on the case, talk a constitutional lawyer. The case is about religious freedom on the first amendment. Since you liked the case via Wikipedia you would be pleased to know that the same site has it under The free exercise of religion -> Solicitation by religious groups. But I am sure its not about religious freedom.
Stay at your high school civics teachings. Be honest with yourself. Don't answer, I care about the answer. Just ask yourself: Had you even heard of Marsh V Alabama before bothering with Q?
YOU started talking about filing a lawsuit and even gave a stupid example. If you were not wronged, then stop complaining. If you were wronged and don't care, then also stop complaining. If you believe you are wrong and care about it, file a case. If you don't you are either a lair or a coward.
The case is about religious freedom on the first amendment.
No, it isn't. It's about whether the 1st Amendment applies to certain parties or not.
If you were not wronged, then stop complaining. If you were wronged and don't care, then also stop complaining. If you believe you are wrong and care about it, file a case. If you don't you are either a lair or a coward.
I'll do whatever the fuck I please with complete disregard to your opinion.
Where in Marsh does it say that the company town was "in the business of speech" or that what the business of any given entity has any bearing on whether or not this analysis applies? You made that up. So we've established that you've cited exactly one case that you don't actually understand and you have literally no clue what you're even talking about.
What's that you say? You can recover damages when a party breaches a contract that are based on the other party's gain without your own loss?
You've clearly never set foot in a law school. You can't just scream "Restitutionary damages" and suddenly get someone's ad revenue. Your contract to use reddit is not part of the same transaction as reddit's contracts with their advertisers. Restitution is not just randomly given out, but you'd know that if you actually studied law instead of just battering the keyboard with random words you heard once in between licking the cheeto dust off your fingers.
Where in Marsh does it say that the company town was "in the business of speech" or that what the business of any given entity has any bearing on whether or not this analysis applies?
I didn't say that it did. If you aren't even reading what I wrote I'm not going to waste time engaging with you.
Lloyd said you can't hand out leaflets in a mall. A mall is in the business of selling goods. Completely different situation. Reddit is selling you the promise of a speech platform. Speech is their entire business.
Wipe the spit off your chin and try to keep up with yourself.
The test I applied is from the quote directly above that. Funny that you're mouthing off about "keeping up" when you literally don't even understand what I said.
Yeah and that quote doesn't say anything about the business of the entity mattering in any way.
That is exactly what it says:
The more an owner, for his advantage, opens up his property for use by the public in general, the more do his rights become circumscribed by the statutory and constitutional rights of those who use it.
Malls are open to the public in order to allow people to go there and buy goods. Reddit is open to the public because the public discussion space they provide is literally their business. I can't even imagine a business that would more fully meet the test.
The Cyber Promotions case is way different. That's commercial speech (far less 1st Amendment protection) and it's spamming people, and therefore obnoxious. Reddit is messages sent out to people who want to participate in the discussion.
The more an owner, for his advantage, opens up his property for use by the public in general, the more do his rights become circumscribed by the statutory and constitutional rights of those who use it.
All that says is the more that a property is open to public use (specifically standing in for state or municipal functions) the more it's property rights have to be limited by the rights of the people using it. It says nothing about the nature of the business affecting this analysis.
From Cyber Promotions:
By providing its members with access to the Internet through its e-mail system so that its members can exchange information with those members of the public who are also connected to the Internet, AOL is not exercising any of the municipal powers or public services traditionally exercised by the State as did the private company in Marsh. Although AOL has technically opened its e-mail system to the public by connecting with the Internet, AOL has not opened its property to the public by performing any municipal power or essential public service and, therefore, does not stand in the shoes of the State. Marsh is simply inapposite to the facts of the case sub judice.
A shopping mall is not equivalent to a town. Though it duplicates the commercial function traditionally associated with a town's business district or marketplace, the similarity ends there. People do not live in shopping malls. Malls do not provide essential public services such as water, sewers roads, sanitation or vital records, nor are they responsible for education, recreation or transportation. Thus, the Marsh analysis is not applicable to the instant case.
Here the court is more clearly defining the test for Marsh. The service has to have so much influence over the exercise of the individual's rights that they are effectively standing in for the state. Reddit does not meet that standard.
Cyber has numerous alternative avenues of sending its advertising to AOL members. An example of another avenue Cyber has of sending its advertising to AOL members over the Internet is the World Wide Web which would allow access by Internet users, including AOL customers, who want to receive Cyber's e-mail. Examples of non-Internet avenues include the United States mail, telemarketing, television, cable, newspapers, magazines and even passing out leaflets. Of course, AOL's decision to block Cyber's e-mail from reaching AOL's members does not prevent Cyber from sending its e-mail advertisements to the members of competing commercial online services, including *444 CompuServe, the Microsoft Network and Prodigy.
Nowhere in the opinion does the commercial nature of the speech affect the decision. Commercial speech does technically get less protection than political speech, but it's not just a blanket value judgment that pops up here and there. There are specific limitations that have to meet constitutional tests like Central Hudson, which you have not cited.
The service has to have so much influence over the exercise of the individual's rights that they are effectively standing in for the state. Reddit does not meet that standard.
Sessions just said he's considering antitrust against several of the largest providers like facebook and twitter. They clearly meet that test, and reddit, as a large provider in that space very likely meets that test, especially if you consider the way that a handful of companies with similarly restrictive policies control almost all of the social media space.
The case would turn entirely on that test, and there's a much stronger case to be made against reddit than you're acknowledging.
Antitrust charges have been brought against many business entities, it doesn't mean they stand in for the state. They're completely different concepts. This isn't how legal analysis works.
Besides, it hasn't even happened yet. They're considering a probe, they haven't even started really investigating let alone secured a conviction.
Antitrust charges have been brought against many business entities, it doesn't mean they stand in for the state. They're completely different concepts. This isn't how legal analysis works.
This is why people hate lawyers. You latch onto details so that you can intentionally misunderstand what someone said and then pretend like they're wrong. What I said was right, you're just playing word games.
If a company is so big that antitrust action is being brought, it's pretty safe to say that they are also acting more like the town square than a private forum with a few hundred members.
Besides, it hasn't even happened yet. They're considering a probe, they haven't even started really investigating let alone secured a conviction.
Irrelevant. You won't even concede that I have a point (not only do I have a point, but I'm probably right, especially if Kavanaugh is on the bench when the case lands there) even though it's glaringly obvious from a simple observation of what's going on.
Stop nitpicking about words, and absorb the fact that the president is on twitter saying social media censorship is illegal and needs to stop. Given that fact, it's not at all unreasonable to think that a suit against social media companies is above the level of frivolous that you're pretending it is.
This is why people hate lawyers. You latch onto details so that you can intentionally misunderstand what someone said and then pretend like they're wrong. What I said was right, you're just playing word games.
I thought that you were the only one here who understood how this would really go down in the courts and you doubted I had any legal training at all. Now its lawyers who have it all wrong too? Give me a fucking break. You realized this bullshit you're throwing around would be laughed out of the courtroom so now you change tactics and say it's the courts who are wrong and they just play word games because you don't have the legal training to understand them and probably couldn't hack it in law school anyway--you cling to one case that you think says what you want to hear but ignore a later one as "word games". Which is it, huh? Do you stand by legal precedent or is it just lawyers' mumbo jumbo? You don't get to have it both ways.
Not only do we have a bunch of brigaders who don't understand the law, we have an actual lawyer who is making fun of me but doesn't have a clue what is actually wrong with what I said (nothing).
And gutting the CFPB of authority and leadership to advocate on behalf of consumers against corporations fits into that how? He rants on Twitter against companies and people who run companies he doesn't like. Him saying a thing is illegal doesn't make it so, that isn't actually doing anything for you or for your cause.
a misrepresentation is an untrue or misleading[1] statement of fact made during negotiations by one party to another, the statement then inducing that other party into the contract.[2][3] The misled party may normally rescind the contract, and sometimes may be awarded damages as well
I can't explain why you're wrong because I don't actually know anything about how laws work, so I'm just going to pretend like what you're saying is wrong and wouldn't work in court
because i'm gonna run your shitty argument to the ground. plus, i'm having fun seeing you reply. please keep doing it, you're making yourself look like a complete moron
because i'm gonna run your shitty argument to the ground.
How are you planning to do that? The only thing you've done is say that I'm wrong because you think I'm a "pussy" and won't actually sue anyone. When you get around to your attempt, the shift key is right below enter. It will turn the little letters into big letters and make the words look pretty.
Ouch, using his own words against him. I will donate $500 to the charity of u/theCIAsellsdrugs if he actually takes this to court and manages to win the case.
Reddit says in their terms of service that they may ban you for literally any reason. Be it a rule violation or just by throwing darts blindly at a board of usernames. And since Reddit is not part of the government, a monopoly or a utility they may ban anyone for almost any reason.
The reason the court ruled in that way was because it was an entire town open to all just like any other town. The only difference being that it was all owned by a company instead of a municipality.
Reddit is more like a fenced in factory with open gates that has a sign above them saying "anyone can enter but we can force you to leave for breaking these rules or for almost any other reason we want." Which would be their right.
Reddit did not "misrepresent" anything in your "negotiations" with them as they clearly stated in the agreement you accepted that they may ban you or your subreddit for almost any reason. Be it a rule violation or just because they feel like it.
Actually thinking Reddit has to give you a platform may be the stupidest thing I'll read on here all day.
Lol I love when idiots cite Marsh. Do you live on reddit? Is reddit the only place that you can contact others? Not even close to comparable. You'd probably know that if you went to law school, but you seem more the sovereign citizen type to me.
The Attorney General is considering antitrust action against some of these social media companies. So, yes, I think arguing that they are an oligopoly controlling the areas where people engage in political speech would probably have some traction.
Jeff Sessions is a fucking buffoon who can't even give a proper deposition. Besides, he said he's "open to a probe". That means they're maybe possibly considering an investigation to see if maybe possibly there might be something they could try to see if there is a possibility of pursuing further action.
Even if that were the case, it still doesn't meet Marsh because you can still email people, you can still send things via mail, you can start your own website, and there are even still existing websites you can go to that have not banned this kind of crazy idiocy. Just because they're smaller doesn't mean they don't exist. You're entitled to express yourself; doesn't mean you're entitled to a large audience.
The court ruled the way they did in Marsh because the town owned the very goddamn land this guy was living on. He physically had no other way to communicate his beliefs. The internet offers too many options to ever be comparable to Marsh. It's an 80 year old case, it's never going to support an entire lawsuit on its own.
You're entitled to your opinion, but you're throwing a literal hissy fit and insulting me when my position is backed by Supreme Court case law, the current president and attorney general.
You've been insulting people this entire thread. Hell, you've been insulting the very institution of the court with your rampant dipshittery. Go do your fucking 1L year at Florida Coastal and come back and tell us all if you still think you're gonna win this "literally nothing cited except Marsh case" that you won all of reddit's ad revenue from.
Not at all. I've responded to a bunch of insults from people who were not only wrong, but absolutely clueless at a basic level. If you don't want to get insulted, don't sling shit around.
you've been insulting the very institution of the court with your rampant dipshittery.
Bwhahaha! I literally almost fell out of my chair I just laughed so hard at this!
Attention Americans: some random guy on the internet has besmirched the sacred honor of the Supreme Court with his reddit comment!
You can't tell people "come post on our website, just follow these rules" and then arbitrarily create new rules under false pretenses because they said things you don't like.
Says who?
In fact, if you have enough market share, it's not at all clear that you can restrict people's 1st Amendment rights at all, even if you are a private corporation.
What does this have to do with this:
For example, a utility company can't refuse to sell power to Democrats.
That's only one of the legal issues. The more important issue is misrepresentation: telling people that you'll have a fair platform when you fully intend to control and censor the platform.
But it says right on the user agreement: We reserve the right to modify, suspend, or discontinue the Services (in whole or in part) at any time, with or without notice to you.
and
Although we have no obligation to screen, edit, or monitor Your Content, we may, in our sole discretion, delete or remove Your Content at any time and for any reason, including for a violation of these Terms, a violation of our Content Policy, or if you otherwise create liability for us.
It's no different than a baker not wanting to bake a cake for a gay couple. Seems our government believes they should as a private business accommodate them. Reddit should have to accommodate speech they don't agree with as well.
Lmfao that's called DISCRIMINATION. And has nothing to do with freedom of speech on privately operated websites, which is what we are talking about. What are you even talking about???
You need to go refresh yourself on the definitions of the legal words you are using because you are 100% wrong in what you are saying.
Or better yet just literally google "does private companies require free speech" and you'll see multiple articles and even case law and scholars explaining it.
But you dont want to learn any facts you would rather spew misinformation and damn right lies.
I've explained why you're wrong but it just goes put one ear and out the other. I used to think like you in regards to the 1st amendment. Turns out I was wrong just like you are.
It's actually very very specific about what is free speech. It doesnt apply to everything no matter how bad you want it to.
You're right. It is called discrimination. That's why I used that example. Social media is simply discriminating against conservatives. "We don't agree with your point of view", so we'll just ban you and not allow you to be heard. Sounds very much like they just don't want to bake a a conservative cake to me.
I mean...yeah. That’s pretty much the case. Of course if there’s any evidence showing that they actually were discriminating against gays then they’d still be up shit creek.
Now you're making a bit more sense. And that might be true. I agree that more social media sites ban conservatives more often than liberals but that's because it's a private website and they can control who gets to say what. It sucks sometimes.
But that's not against the 1st amendment as already established by the courts.
You simply can hop over to any number of conservative blogs or websites and say your opinion as much as you want. And those sites can very well ban liberals if they choose to.
But Once again this is not violating the 1st amendment because the 1st amendment only applies to the GOVERNMENT censoring the public, the press, protests, etc.
Breaking away and going to some "safe space" is not a good solution IMO. We should be able to discuss our differences in opinions openly and without (too much!) ridicule. How else can we all come to an agreement? We should all get the chance to be heard.
I would love for you to describe the monetary loss you would like to claim here. Breach of contract is civil not criminal, and civil generally (if not always) needs monetary value to be tried.
It doesn't have to be monetary loss, that's for tort damages. For contracts, the damages are the benefits the other party received from the contract, in this case the profits that reddit earned from my contributions, including all of the payments from reddit gold awarded to my posts, and any ad revenue they have earned.
That is a loss, if you pay for something and don't get its contracted value, that's the loss. Semantics aside, it's laughable to think that ad and gold purchases have lost their purchase value because a bunch of nutjobs content has now disappeared. So, thanks I needed that.
Thank you for linking that article. For those too lazy to read it (like you apparently), unjust enrichment requires the following:
Cases of unjust (or unjustified) enrichment can be examined in the following way:
-Was the defendant enriched?
-Was the enrichment at the expense of the claimant?
-Was the enrichment unjust ?
-Does the defendant have a defense?
-What remedies are available to the claimant?
I think the key problems here are the points that I marked in bold. Any enrichment that you feel was unjust must have been at your expense, and it wasn't. I can see that you've never bought gold, so you lost nothing by other people buying it. And unless you purchased any ads, you lost nothing by ad companies purchasing ad space on Reddit either. This goes into the other point about remedies.
The remedy for unjust enrichment is restitution: the restoration of what was conferred to the claimant. In short, the correcting of the injustice that occurred when the claimant suffered a subtraction of wealth and the defendant received corresponding benefit.
Since you suffered no subtraction of wealth by the claimant (Reddit), you have no monetary losses and no claim for unjust enrichment. There is no money to refund to you since you have spend no money in the first place.
You're taking "was the enrichment at the expense of the claimant" to mean "the claimant must have suffered financial loss." That's not what it means.
Imagine if an author agreed to a certain royalty payment with a publisher, and the publisher didn't pay up. The author can't show that they actually lost money, only that they weren't paid money that they were due. The publisher can't just keep the money, because that would be unjust enrichment.
Same thing if reddit promises me a forum for free political speech that they will earn money form, knowing that they actually intend to manipulate the discussion by banning certain ideas. If they take the money I earned them, and turn around and deny me a forum for free speech, they are being unjustly enriched by the content I submitted.
The difference between your two examples is the author still had a monetary amount that they can claim they were owed. They can show exactly what they are owed. You on the other hand are owed no money and there is no restitution to give. What would you even sue for? Do you want Reddit to refund the other people who spent money? If so, you aren't the claimant then.
I'm assuming you are just trolling now, but if not go re-read that quoted section of the Wikipedia article again. With an unjust enrichment lawsuit you aren't entitled to any profits they made while you were wronged, you are entitled to compensation for any lost wealth you had incurred. But by all means, please go ahead and sue Reddit because they banned a couple subreddits. Someone always makes a post like this every time it happens, and no one ever goes through with the lawsuit.
"Constitutional protections of free speech under First and Fourteenth Amendments still applicable within the confines of a town owned by a private entity."
Absolutely nothing to do with private COMPANIES.
So why exactly do you keep linking us to this? Did you just pick the very first court case you saw that says "1st amendment" and "private" in it? Because you are so far off it's sad, tbh.
I hope, one day, you take the time to truly research and understand the way our constitution works.
Lmfao. So you literally dont even know what the result of the court case your linking is. Cause that's it up there. And it's completely irrelevant to the conversation we are having at hand.
That's because you still have no idea what you're talking about.
You keep commenting with a link to a court case. That court case has absolutely nothing to do with anything we are discussing. You are wrong.
That's what I'm saying. If you still dont understand, you should consider taking a few courses on basic English and communication because I'm sorry I cant make this any clearer.
That's because you still have no idea what you're talking about.
No, I have no idea what you're talking about. You seemed to think there is a distinction between private "entity" and "COMPANY". I have no idea what you think that distinction is, but I assure you that a private "COMPANY" is a form of private "entity" and that none of this has anything to do with whether such an entity can enact viewpoint-based discrimination when they have exclusive control over the place where political speech occurs.
If you'd like to clarify what on earth you're trying to get across, it might be easier if you stop insulting me. Both because it's dickish, and because it makes you look a lot worse when someone proves you wrong if you were insulting them beforehand.
Lol you're dense. Which city or town does reddit own? None.
If they did , and began to censor speech and religion IN THAT TOWN, THEN you would be correct to link that court case.
Sense we are talking about websites and private companies (not those companies towns) you are wrong. Sorry to break it to you, but you are wrongly twisting and manipulating the decision of that court case to fit your narrative.
The more an owner, for his advantage, opens up his property for use by the public in general, the more do his rights become circumscribed by the statutory and constitutional rights of those who use it...
Thus, the owners of privately held bridges, ferries, turnpikes and railroads may not operate them as freely as a farmer does his farm. Since these facilities are built and operated primarily to benefit the public, and since their operation is essentially a public function, it is subject to state regulation.
Reddit, just like facebook, twitter, and other major social media companies, are the primary place that people engage in political discussions today.
you are wrongly twisting and manipulating the decision of that court case
You are wrongly twisting and manipulating every word you say because you have no clue what you're talking about and you think your raw emotion of hatred and disgust is an argument. It's not. You're wrong.
Breach of contract. You can't tell people "come post on our website, just follow these rules" and then arbitrarily create new rules under false pretenses because they said things you don't like.
Almost every form of socialmedia or forums terms of service will always say they can change their polices without notification. So yeah. They can.
Except ya know doxxing @s8tan or whatever that guys twitter handle is. Mods deleted his response asking you chuckle fucks to leave him alone while leaving up articles linking his full name, town, etc.
Why is anyone arguing with this idiot? It sounds like this guy has a few classes in law, or at worst is a recent grad of law school, and has zero experience arguing anything where there is actual consequences decided by a third party.
What he fails to realize is that the surplus of people aligning against him, means his arguments are ineffective. In other words, he's so blind to reality that he thinks he's winning, while failing to do the very thing a real lawyer would need to do; persuade people to agree with him.
You're going to be banned for brigading and calling people names because you can't handle opinions different from your own. Hopefully that cancerous sub gets banned for encouraging brigading and being run by intelligence agencies.
Why is anyone arguing with this idiot? It sounds like this guy has a few classes in law, or at worst is a recent grad of law school, and has zero experience arguing anything where there is actual consequences decided by a third party.
What he fails to realize is that the surplus of people aligning against him, means his arguments are ineffective. In other words, he's so blind to reality that he thinks he's winning, while failing to do the very thing a real lawyer would need to do; persuade people to agree with him.
And if you had any legal training or experience, you'd be able to explain what was wrong with it. Hint: nothing. You're just upset and emotional, and presented zero facts, which is why I give precisely 0 fucks about your opinion.
I'm not upset. I read your stuff because it cracks me up. Its a break from actually practicing law.
I generally don't argue law with novices online because its pointless; like arguing with the homeless paranoid schizophrenic that lives in the park outside my office. I'm never going to convince him that Major League Baseball hasn't put a microchip in his brain, just like I'm never going to convince you that your legal theories are best served on the bottom of the bird cage.
Then you're a fucking terrible lawyer. Two comments and you've only been able to present a logical fallacy to support your position.
You're apparently a jag, and you're talking like you're some expert on contracts? Don't you guys handle mostly criminal and administrative law?
I've got quite a bit of experience with contracts from negotiating them in numerous business ventures over the years. Which means I know a lot more about contracts than any lawyer that isn't a contract specialist (and even then, I often know more if they don't know about the industry). But keep on believing that you're special because you spent a quarter million dollars to learn things you could have learned from someplace like nolo.
You might want to take a look at who staffs the Contract and Fiscal Law Division of the U.S. Army Legal Services. It ain't nutjobs like you talking out of their ass. You know when the Army spends billions of dollars on pretty much anything? There is always a contract.
So why don't you go ahead and sue for breach of contract? Let us know how it works out. Until then, you are just an internet legal tough guy talking about all the stuff he will never do.
So why don't you go ahead and sue for breach of contract?
Because my damages are under $100 and I can't do a class action pro se.
Until then, you are just an internet legal tough guy talking about all the stuff he will never do.
Are you telling me that you accept the proposition "anyone who discusses legal matters on the internet without a present intent to file a lawsuit is full of shit"? I'll remind you (since you have a lot of trouble actually articulating clear, logic propositions) to discuss the actual claim I just made and try to refute it in some way, rather than invoking some logical fallacy.
Sorry, I get paid to argue contract law. I don't give it away for free to amateurs.
Go find an attorney to take on the class action. When they all laugh at you during the consult, go file it yourself; it need not be as a class. Since you are the legal expert, you should be able to file as a class anyway. Didn't you read that part of Nolo?
Real practitioners love nutjob pro se filings. Its a good laugh, and your paperwork will be handed around for years as an example of the failures of the American mental health care system.
I don't give a single fuck. I have had to work with people that went to Harvard and Yale and billed hundreds of dollars an hour that were complete morons.
You get respect from me when you make an argument that is backed up by facts. And you have done nothing but repeatedly pound your chest about how smart you are, with absolutely no reference to the facts I've given in support of what I said which include: Supreme Court precedent, the opinion of the president, and statements made by the Attorney General of the United States.
Since you are the legal expert, you should be able to file as a class anyway.
Are you fucking serious? You're claiming to be a litigator and you don't know that you can't file a class action without being a licensed attorney?
You are under the impression that I care about the respect of a random internet nutjob.
You mean lawyers can do something not covered on Nolo? I'm glad you came to that realization, at least.
You still haven't explained why you haven't filed straight pro se, if your argument is so convincing, by the way. Come on, I really want to see your batcrap crazy filings.
To put it shortly: You're obviously immune to anything people tell you if it doesn't align with your opinion.
Thus, you should skip all this here, stop wasting your time and instead consult a lawyer. He will tell you exactly the same and probably you'll still disagree, but hey, at least this time it also cost you good money without bringing you one step further. Also be prepared to be laughed at when throwing in terms like "breach of contract" or supposed precedents like a Jehovas' Witness distributing books in 1946.
To put it shortly: You're obviously immune to anything people tell you if it doesn't align with your opinion.
Not at all. It actually sounds like you don't know anything about the subject matter, so you jumped to the conclusion that I just must be narrow-minded about the topic.
Thus, you should skip all this here, stop wasting your time and instead consult a lawyer.
Why would I do that? I don't have enough damages. The only way you could get a lawyer to take this is if you went for a class action.
Can you answer some questions for me? Why do all of the topinds brigade seem to think this is ridiculous, but out of dozens of you only one has even attempted to explain why? Do you not actually understand anything about the law, so you just assume it can't be true because none of your "trusted sources" have told you to think about it that way?
Also be prepared to be laughed at when throwing in terms like "breach of contract" or supposed precedents like a Jehovas' Witness distributing books in 1946.
You literally just said that you "laugh at" Supreme Court precedent. And you think I'm the one that doesn't understand how laws work?
It seems like I was winning the argument and you don't know anything about basic legal concepts that even non-lawyers would know, so you started rattling off tired propaganda techniques
Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can’t do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how ‘sensitive they are to criticism.’
If what I said was wrong, why don't you just explain why? Frankly, I can't recall a single time that the person who actually knew what they were talking about was the one that led off with insults.
I still don't know how to refute anything you said, so I'm going to pretend it amuses me, because I can't think for myself and I assume that those who adopt a mocking posture are correct, so I assume others will accept my mockery as an actual response to specific arguments
"I am not allowed to call people faggots, so the gays must have taken over the world"
I understand that quoting your favourite TV show makes you feel smart, but it just shows you only know how to repeat things that make you feel smart.
That line has never been the case, as there are many powerless people and institutions that are not socially acceptable to mock or attack but who still hold no power. Single parents, orphans, people who suffer terrible illness in general, etc.
That you can't tell the difference between "socially unacceptable" and "police state" truly does encapsulate everything wrong with the T_D brand of critical thinking, if you could even call it that.
You don't really put any effort into your insults do you? I'm disappointed. At the very least you could offer up some material worth re-using in the future. I can't do anything with this, it's not worth shit.
Racists. Yeah okay. Luckily for you you can now just sit here and make any false claim you want about the sub because there’s no way for you to prove it. You must have a sad, sad existence.
Classic basement dweller threatening people online again. No, I'm not driving down to South Jersey with you redneck wannabes. Go back to your mountain dew and pepe memes you neckbeard
We are aware that they have the legal right to do so. This however is indicative of a issue that is going to become more noticeable and important in the future; namely that the "public commons" which are now social media platforms are leading to a world where the body politics is controlled and manipulated by private parties.
When you go down to the community park do you run around ranting like crazy or realize you're in a public space and act appropriately?? In general, I'd say the vast majority of people adhere to the latter. Failing that--what you're essentially describing would amount to an opening in the 'market' which I'm sure some enterprising people would seek to fill.
What you are talking about is discrimination based on sex.
A more apt analogy would be a business' right to deny said gay couple to put out gay porn magazines in their bakery and call for hanging of anti-gay politicians on their wall outside.
Imagine if said gay couple cried "muh free speech" when the business said they couldn't do that.
Is this the same bakery turning a blind eye to couples who want to put out extreme hardcore pornagraphy and videos by violent religious extremists who are also selling drugs on the street corner nearest that same bakery? Not to mention the soft-pedo imagery targeted towards children of customers of that bakery?
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
Hey man thank you for posting this, I’m sorry for sounding like an idiot here, but could you maybe enlighten me on what kind of stuff was discussed on GA. I haven’t ever seen it but I am very curious as to what is going down right now
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
Yeah I got to agree with him. I had not seen any post inciting violence. a huge majority would say “got what he/she deserved” but never anything about inciting the violence.
There were calls for GB for certain people, and there was a lively discussion about whether a Military Tribunal could be used to find certain individuals guilty of treason (spawn by the questioning of Kavanaugh during the hearings).
Everything was speculation and candid conversation about how The Powers that Be have completely fucked the American public, and why certain things did not add up.
A lot of it was dislike towards the MSM and their ineptitude to presents facts, unbiased and true, while steadily and in your face pushing a leftist agenda.
I personally thought everyone should’ve stuck with the decoding of the Q drops and kept the emotion of hate/dislike out of there. And this is why.
I even got “torn” into by a q supporter simply because I wanted to remind everyone that McCain had a family and was a human being, so maybe try not to continue slandering his name. He died, he lost his right to a trial, therefore we lost our right to judge him (just my opinion), even if it comes out later that he was killed, or he was involved in the heinous things people accuse him of, he definitely paid the ultimate price, stop getting hung up on that shit, move on.
I think they were banned because they were inciting violence toward politicians and people they disagreed with politically.
They never did this.
constant calls for civil war and public executions
No there weren't.
honestly i saw it coming for a while with that sub. so many sitewide rule violations there, i knew it was only a matter of time.
No you didn't.
It was a popcorn sub, not a pitchfork sub. Anyone that doesn't believe this likely never followed it. There are at least a dozen subs on both sides of the reddit-Hate-Grand-Canyon that grossly, violently break such rules hourly that have never faced consequences for marginal posters in their subs. Consider why. No one genuinely interested in that sub incited any violence. This shutdown happened because it was a threat to someone. Who? If someone were allegedly threatened by the content of the sub, why wouldn't ya just sign up a bunch of accounts and then suddenly break a bunch of rules to get it shut down?
Spare me. If I go post on a sub of your choice saying things that violate a bunch of the site's rules does that make the sub about those things I said?
If it's massively upvoted by the community, attracts similarly minded people, and isn't dealt with by the mods, then... uh... yea, kinda?
Like, sure, pop in at r/mma and start sharing some child porn. If the community welcomes it, contributes to it, and the mods refuse to remove it, I'm pretty sure that'll implicate the shit out of r/mma.
I can still remember rabid US pundits on MSM asking for Assange to get assassinated. All the war mongering and 1M kids were worth it noise didn't bother them either.
I mean, I don't buy into the whole Qanon thing but I went there mainly out of morbid curiosity but never saw anything worse than what is posted even in the main political subs directed at Trump, the whole thing stinks and a lot of the responses in here stink as well, if they're really banning subs for these reasons then they might as well nuke the whole god damn site because it's fucking everywhere. Shit like Incels I can understand to a degree but even then they're all just living out their sick little fantasies in their echo chamber, unless they're actually hurting or intending to hurt someone I don't understand the point of censorship, I doubt that many people even knew what thegreatawakening was.
PUBLICLY. It''s WAY PAST TIME for the millions of morons to wake up to the murders that they've helped facilitate. I'm only willing to let the accessories off the hook if they finally repudiate the leftards vociferously and violently.
Soldiers lost because of deep state, they better hope she is lock up soon. Because she is a walking target in my book. I tell you this she will be (x) out.
Yeah you weren’t sent here to push a certain narrative and have all your sickly buddies upvote you.
If Q is a LARP, why do you follow enough to know whether it’s correct or not? Why care enough to try and shut something down you think is all make believe.
“It was only a matter of time before they got violent.” Save it. The sub was filled with some pretty sound minded people who only want freedom of speech, ideas and to expose corruption and evil. Anyone who opposes that clearly has something to lose with the success of Q.
No matter how many upvotes you and all your buddies rack up, not a single imaginary internet point will take away 50,000 + sealed indictments waiting to be unsealed.
I payed attention for the same reason I have problems looking away from monkeys throwing shit at the zoo. It's fascinating to me watching people so damned primitive hang on the words of an anonymous source who's been wrong just over and over and over again.
Still waiting for Hillary's arrest. Feel like I'll NEVER stop waiting because it was a stupid fucking larp, and literally every person who believed it should probabky turn themselves in to the nearest mental hospital for rehabilitation.
Sad thing is I'm not even trying to troll you or something, stop wasting your time defending an imaginary internet conspiracy, look for help if you just can't, live a happy life. Nobody is against you. You are just wasting time (like I am right now, probably), and that is the most valuable thing you have.
If I am listening to an argument to determine which is better, sea salt or pink salt, then I want to listen to people who actually know what they are taking about. I don't want to listen to a 3 year old talk about their trip to beach. The great awakening was the 3 year old.
Why internalize arguments made by the ignorant and/or delusional, though?
Some “sides” of the argument serve no purpose except to poison the barrel of public discourse. The more people listen, regardless of which conclusion they come to, the more political extremists accomplish their goal of polarizing the country.
Anything can be evidence for your beliefs when you’re delusional. There can be no other reasonable explanation for why r/greatawakening was banned.
If the conspiracy is so worthless that it has no legs to stand on, why bother banning it? Why ot just let it deflate on its own? Why the suppression? Banned because of violent threats? What about threats going on in other subs? Do they collapse /r/books if someone threatens to kill another user? Me thinks not.
probability of the likelihood of the types of entities being banned throughout social media. doesn't raise any flags vis-a-vis a supposedly free speech society under democracy? #blackswan
probability of the likelihood of the types of entities being banned throughout social media. doesn't raise any flags vis-a-vis a supposedly free speech society under democracy? .blackswan.
i mean the guy got caught photoshopping a picture of airforce one to use as evidence that he is really in the president's inner circle, but yeah sure this shit show getting banned totally gives him tons of credibility.
Please do not advocate ban evasion with regards admin sanctioned subreddits; such behavior could put both your account, and this subreddit, in jeopardy. Thank you for your understanding.
One can hope we overcome the darkness. Reading about what's happening in the EU is scary too. Things always move east to west. Just like the sun. Keep your guns America and stay dangerous and free. Free in all forms.
Ditto too, and Godspeed. The 2nd protects the first. The first has been under attack ever since a particular group has bought out most mass communications (including this site). Speech control is thought control. More important than ever to utilize your right to free speech. You don't use it, you lose it.
I have allot of them archived but if we bring them here this one is at risk for being taken down. We have the info we need now we vote for change and support those who have been trying to change it.
There are alternatives like voat and 4chan but the format and the lingo used on those boards is meant to keep "normies" out. So something like reddit without a downvote/upvote system is what we need.
Soon we will have our group-think acceptable topic of discussion - anything else will be immediately banned and subject to prosecution. Look at what is happening to the internet in Europe. We are not far behind them with stunts like this. Free speech online is dying.
Any religious body that says that non-believers are cattle, goy, sheep, infadels etc. Is a danger and a cancer to our human race and needs to be disbanded. Won't happen until all of the people wake up and take serious action.
Agreed. All this censorship shows that they are clearly getting desperate and abusing their control at this point. This is good for us, people are waking up.
If they just stopped trying to control it all it would end up better for them. So a part of me loves the fact that they have no clue what they're doing in this information war. Gives me hope. A new hope.
Yup. The phenomenon of the internet really threw them for a loop. Just look at how overwhelmingly blind previous generations were. The internet has been their biggest threat, and thank God we have it.
Don't be so optimistic. The average person nowadays is incredibly intellectually lazy. If good information isn't readily available and easily accessible, there's a good chance that all these truth awakenings taking place will fizzle out.
I have no quarrels with anyone over what they believe until their beliefs infringe upon my life. Religious people and get into power and make laws to govern what I should do with my possesions, mind, body and spirit. Also anyone with an agenda to do the same thing. So fuck them. Fuck them good.
Plus when you consider the violence you hear and see is coming from the left, which makes this more unbelieveable, and just another one of their projection stradegies. NWO must be really scared.
Antifa, Punch a Nazi, attack people wearing trump hats, rise up and remove trump from the White House if they can’t find legal means. There’s a few and I’m not even following this stuff. I do however follow right wing sites and everyone urges each other not to attend right wing rallies specifically to avoid violence
You do know that the amount of violence committed by antifa is blown way out of proportion by the media, right?
And that right wing violence happens far more often than left wing violence? Like, take Charlottesville - the right wing protesters there actually killed one of the left wing counter-protesters. Or how mass shooters are much more likely to be those with right-leaning views than left-leaning views.
Since you seem to be someone who likes learning information, here's a video to watch about what anti-fascist action usually actually involves, so you can get a better idea of what antifa really get up to most of the time: https://youtu.be/bgwS_FMZ3nQ
So your saying they don't act like facists "def:a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition" ... screaming at people who do not agree with them ? calling people "Nazi" "Straight White Male" , etc , etc
I mean... 'Nazi' is an appropriate thing to call white supremicists (sorry, 'identitarians') who want to advance their cause by taking control of governmental and societal institutions.
And antifa are Anti Fascists they don't want to create a centralised, autocratic government, headed by a dictototorial leader, and they're not for severe economic and social regimentation. They work explicitly to prevent fascism from taking root. You may not agree with their methods (though I suggest you watch the video I linked above to get a better idea of what most of their actual methods entail), but to call antifa fascists is to (at best) be either ignorant of the truth, or disengenuous about reality.
The thing I never got with Antifa is that if they are against fascists... Great thats a good thing... But how come they were labelled as a terrorist organisation... Why do they cover their faces if they have nothing to hide?
The problem with Antifa is, they go to events ready to brawl, masked up and ready to start violance. They destroy public and private property, as well as beat people up even if they are just civilians, yet if they truly believe in anti fascism they shouldn't hide their faces.
That is why they are classified as a domestic terror organisation, even Nancy Pelosi, minority leader of the Democrats condemned them.
Most importantly, those on the right side of politics who are causing violance, they should be arrested and suffer the consequences of the law as well. There was so many posts and comments on r/TheGreatAwakening board that spoke of not going down the violant path, and condemning and down voting violant Inflaming posts. I really doubt the reasons given for the banning of that sub.
When you see the Q followers at trumps rally, there not wearing masks, they are holding cardboard signs.
The fact they kept The Donald but got rid of TGA....
The Donald is a much more wild and aggressive subreddit than TGA ever was.
History repeats itself ... But those that know history will not let it happen again
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antifaschistische_Aktion
they even use the same name !
Do something for me get three history books one printed nowadays one 20 years ago and one 30 compare...
Actually I don't think it is very appropriate to call white supremacists 'nazis' , even if they intend to gain political power/government control.
Defining aspects of nazi ideology:
-fascism: state -supremacists , authoritarianism for the sake of authoritarianism.
-national socialism: the people of the nation (motherland/fatherland/homeland) are to be prioritized, the means of production controlled by the state 'for the benefit of the German people'
-Germanic supremacy: 'Aryan' being the ideal, purest German.
Only about race insofar as the people of Germany had been relatively homogeneous traditionally, facilitating the idealization of 'pure German' by Hitler (not even German like wtf my dude).
-scapegoating of Jews, etc; due mostly to personal prejudice by Adolf Hitler against certain groups (Jews, gypsies, Romanians, etc basically any Jew-ISH groups) the devastation of postwar Germany and the suffering of her people were blamed (apparently somewhat convincingly) on the Jews.
So question is, when is the term nazi appropriate ?
Should it be used to describe authoritarians (people who think the government should violate liberty of others in favor of their own ideals) ?
If so, it would seem more descriptive of more left wing groups than right wing groups... at least at present.
Should it be used to describe actual fascists (people who believe the state should be supreme, the state is always good and anything the state does is therefore good)? If so, good luck finding many of those people these days.
Should it be used to describe white supremacists (general 'whiteness' / broadly European genetics are considered supreme) ?
If so, isn't that a bit far-reaching? Nazis were not European-supremacists, they were german - supremacists, hence the whole WW2 thing... the involvement of race was due to the fact that 'German' genetics could be pretty tightly narrowed down. There were some black people in Germany, and while not treated wonderfully, they were not among those carted off and slaughtered, which should clarify the actual sentiments involved.
Should it be used to describe ethno-nationalists? (People who believe that while not necessarily supreme vs others, races/ethnicities ought to be separated into their own nation-states for the best results)
White nationalists? (Believe there should be a homogenous state for white people, as there are such states for Asians, Africans, etc)
How about just plain old nationalists? (Believe their nation is great/best; patriots. Differs from 'supremacy' in that supremacy is an objective characterization (my '____' is the best and everyone must recognize this) whereas nationalism is subjective (I believe my nation is best, but I understand that you probably think yours is best)
Socialists? Should they be called nazis ?The nazis were socialists, which is why they were at such odds with the communists (Hitler and Stalin hated each other's guts). Nothing stirs up vitriol like someone doing your thing in a way that you disapprove of.
State("public/social") control of means of production? Check. Socialism.
I mean, socialism is inherently authoritarian. Is that enough?
Basically: should we use 'nazi' as a vague generalization if any of the above apply?
That would make antifa, the alt-right, the proud boys, democratic socialists, etc all 'nazis' .
Or should we use it in reference to a specific combination of characteristics (which I have outlined) ?
If so, it is only applicable to a tiny subset of people, if any .
Neo-nazi is slightly more flexible but even that is rather specific and doesn't fit the nazi label itself.
And that right wing violence happens far more often than left wing violence?
Perhaps you should look up Tim Pool and his videos. He actually goes to these protests and he will tell you this is blatantly false. Or maybe look up Crowder’s videos on the subject that involved multiple arrests.
Yeah, the left is actually going out and inciting REAL violence yet all these freedom and truth movements are being wiped out because there's a theoretical chance that they might result in violence... WTF?! Absolute horseshit.
The globalists and the elites no that they can't go on with their shenanigans if everyone is awake, so they're desperately trying to figure out how to rig the game in their favor again by trying to put the genie back in the bottle.
Pretty crazy times we're living in. It's up to all of us to fight this!
bro when the IG report comes out this whole thing is going to blow...wait. I mean when the 40k sealed indictments are unsealed at the end of 2017...wait.
Just happened, nobody knows for sure. I have been half expecting this for quite some time. The ban page says that it is for violating TOS and doxing, I hadn't seen that personally.
Of course you'd say that. You blamed the right for violence without considering how violent the left has been recently. For more, do a search on anything ANTIFA related.
Incredibly disappointing exchange to have on this sub.
Never attempted to cover for anyone. You were the one who singled out the right and said they should take some lessons from the left.
What exactly would that be? Shutting down opposition speech on social media? Creating entire subreddits (TMOR) whose sole purpose is to make fun of opposing view points and troll those people? Or, to shoot your political opponents while they play baseball?
TD and GA had very strict content policies due to the fact that they are conservative/anti-establishment subs on reddit, which is now either controlled or manipulated by the establishment left wing. TD is not even allowed to mention the politics sub; they were specifically instructed not to do it. Whenever screencaps are posted, the names are blurred out. GA was relatively the same.
Meanwhile, I've been harassed multiple times by TMOR, whether it be through PMs or by them directly linking to posts I've made on another sub.
I have to assume that you are just trolling at this point.
Never attempted to cover for anyone. You were the one who singled out the right and said they should take some lessons from the left.
None of that is true. We were discussing TMOR and I said how conservative subreddit mods perhaps should take a lesson or two from how they manage their subreddit. Conservative subreddits cry censorship, but they only get shut down after breaking rule after rule. You then made the non-sequitor of bringing up a mentally ill person who shot at politicians. You made the big leap to murderers.
What exactly would that be? Shutting down opposition speech on social media?
Don't break the rules dude. Ain't hard.
Creating entire subreddits (TMOR) whose sole purpose is to make fun of opposing view points and troll those people?
You mean like KotakuInAction, Cringe, CringeAnarchy, The_Donald, etc.. etc..
Or, to shoot your political opponents while they play baseball?
Crying more crocodile tears won't convince me of shit.
TD and GA had very strict content policies due to the fact that they are conservative/anti-establishment subs on reddit
And one got banned while the other didn't. Maybe you should think about what GA was doing wrong....
which is now either controlled or manipulated by the establishment left wing
Bullshit. Reddit is run by right wing libertarians. Fucking spez voted for Trump. You keep on puling the victim card, it ain't working for you buddy.
Meanwhile, I've been harassed multiple times by TMOR, whether it be through PMs or by them directly linking to posts I've made on another sub.
We all get harassed in political subs. If the fire is too hot, don't get in the pan.
I have to assume that you are just trolling at this point.
None of that is true. We were discussing TMOR and I said how conservative subreddit mods perhaps should take a lesson or two from how they manage their subreddit. Conservative subreddits cry censorship, but they only get shut down after breaking rule after rule.
Conservative sub mods have to comply with much stricter rules around here. I cited specific examples. The bar is much, much higher. I browse the left-wing echo chambers. I see what goes on there: threats to the President and his family, calls for violence against people who disagree with the hive mind, etc.
I regularly post on those subs I mentioned and they have to be whitewashed so that no one's feelings in /r/politics gets hurt. Conversely, as I previously mentioned, I have been harassed by TMOR and others who stalk me out in the subs I post in, which are not left-wing echo chambers. That means, they either link to my posts in other subs or I've generated a fan club.
You then made the non-sequitor of bringing up a mentally ill person who shot at politicians. You made the big leap to murderers.
So do we agree that violence across the board does not represent the majority of either side and is most likely the result of mental illness?
You mean like KotakuInAction, Cringe, CringeAnarchy, The_Donald, etc.. etc..
Never visited any of those except TD. TD has to comply with unreasonable moderation standards, when compared to the rest of reddit. I mean, ffs, it's not even allowed on the front page because the memes are too much for you and your friends.
Bullshit. Reddit is run by right wing libertarians. Fucking spez voted for Trump. You keep on puling the victim card, it ain't working for you buddy.
Do you have proof of that claim? I'd love to see it.
We all get harassed in political subs. If the fire is too hot, don't get in the pan.
Do we? As I mentioned earlier, TD can't even link to /r/politics without breaking the rules. The entire purpose of TMOR is to troll and ruin subs who don't agree with them.
Name something then. Go on. List all of the political violence initiated by right wing groups in the US since Trump was elected. I wonder if the total will even come close to that of the left. Shootings, stabbings, starting fires, etc.
you have that completely backwards considering an 'alt right' sub was just banned, the left are the ones playing victim, factually conducting and inciting violence against others
you clearly also have never visited TGA and have 6 posts in your history as well, i mean there IS word for that kinda shit but its not allowed here bc its 'name calling' but it rhymes with schilling....
weird how you have next to no post history, ONLY frequent THIS sub but you know SO much regarding TGA
you have that completely backwards considering an 'alt right' sub was just banned, the left are the ones playing victim, factually conducting and inciting violence against others
lol was it liberals who showed up to Comet Pizza with guns?
you clearly also have never visited TGA
I did. I just didn't post there. There are FAR more lurkers than posters on every website.
weird how you have next to no post history, ONLY frequent THIS sub but you know SO much regarding TGA
I'm not sure what you are talking about I have a post history going back at least a year
and youve never left THIS sub, have 6 posts of your own on random subs
none indicate anything that you know what youre talking about.
why would i even bring it up if i wasnt aware of your first post regarding Comet Ping Pong?
so youre effectively proving me right anyhow
liberals showed up at Comet Pizza with guns?? you mean the guy who ran in there waving a gun firing ONE shot and hitting their HDD in their computer in the office?? that 'liberal' yeah..... liberals dont operate with guns, they use piss bottles, rocks, chains, mace, bear mace, and bike locks....
you 'frequented' TGA but never posted there?? there were over 70k subs as of patriots day, and you NEVER commented or made a post here?? foh NOT ONCE??? riiiiiiiiight
and youve never left THIS sub, have 6 posts of your own on random subs
i honestly have no idea what you are talking about. I have posts on all variety of subs, including this one. I assume you do to. I'm not sure what point you are trying to make.
none indicate anything that you know what youre talking about.
why would i even bring it up if i wasnt aware of your first post regarding Comet Ping Pong?
so youre effectively proving me right anyhow
nonsense.
liberals showed up at Comet Pizza with guns?? you mean the guy who ran in there waving a gun firing ONE shot and hitting their HDD in their computer in the office?? that 'liberal' yeah..... liberals dont operate with guns, they use piss bottles, rocks, chains, mace, bear mace, and bike locks....
what are you even on at this point?
you 'frequented' TGA but never posted there??
Yeah, I go to t_d as well, but don't post there because they are dumb as shit.
there were over 70k subs as of patriots day, and you NEVER commented or made a post here??
Nope. Pretty easy. Maybe you should try not posting.
Not on any calendars that i've ever seen in the last 17 years.
And to say it’s not adopted by anyone spits in every American soldiers face.
I said it wasn't widely adopted by anyone. Also, if soldiers are so sensitive that they can't handle me not acknowledging a dumb holiday, then those snowflakes don't deserve to be in the army.
so what is it about this particular topic that got you to finally break you lurking silence and post?
There have been WAYY more stupid topics posted here and on T_D to do what you're doing now, so why this topic today? Can we expect to see you after this thread dies?
I don't lurk in conspiracy, I used to come here before it became a trump-shilling hellhole, so i have a feeling of ownership to the place. I've been here long before you and probably (sadly) long after (probably not on this account).
concerned? not the right word you're looking for. All i did was ask you a question about why you came out of the wood work for this particular topic and you avoided answering it
Probably when or if they start inciting violence, harassment, or disseminating personal information...so, don’t hold your breath. To try and lump them in with TGA is delusional.
I disagee, my eyes see they are directly involved in targeted harassment...
Anybody that puts one side as better than another is delusional.
My opinion on this is pretty simple, how do you ban only one side of the same coin?!?
Thats the entire crutch of the issue at hand here. Its hypocritical and is effectively drowning out right leaning users. I want bipartisan/nonpartisan.
Not just one fucking side, which is the path we are steering towards with this type of censorship.
Now i haven't browsed TGA but many former users are saying this is bullshit.
Is it possible a concerted effort was put forth with drone accounts posting nonsense to get this desired result? I feel its more than likely and imo probably the real scenario of events.
Nope, not a big fan of the place. What you said is objectively retarded. The folks being 'drowned out' are acting like awful people. I don't care who you are, if you act like an awful person, you lose your privileges. In this case, that's posting to reddit. Other cases might be being banned from a movie theater for yelling 'fire'. Or being taken off a bus for playing your music too loud. You (hopefully) get the idea. The folks making a fuss about the guy yelling fire, or the woman playing her music too loud, aren't "the other side of the coin". There is no correlation between what they're doing and what the people acting inappropriately are doing. There are objectively ethical, moral, true things. Valuing those things means you will eventually need to do something about unethical, immoral, or maliciously false statements or actions. What you're seeing is people rejecting values, which you may or may not subscribe to, as being unethical, immoral, or maliciously false. If our society wants to continue as a group, those are important things for everyone, regardless of political or religious affiliation, to feel are important. People (from all over the political place) have had enough, and the response from the folks acting shitty has been to ratchet up the violent rhetoric, increase hate speech, and spread more and more falsehoods, in the hopes of muddying the waters and preventing any actual truth from taking hold. So, no, this isn't a coin you're dealing with. "Both sides" aren't at fault. One is objectively and willfully wrong, and the other is loudly pointing that out. If you can't figure that out, or after I've explained it to you, can't accept it, you're honestly missing the ability to reason. No reasonable person believes that what was taking place on these subreddits is anywhere near the same as people calling them out as hateful, violent, or intentionally misleading. No reasonable person will believe that hate speech is the same as intolerance of hate speech. If you do, or if you don't think what was occurring was hate speech, you're not being reasonable.
Incredible response. Only the top minds, perhaps Q herself, could come up with such riveting dialogue. Please, give me another incredible response. It is so rare to have such an opportunity to speak with someone so intelligent and in tune with the world. I know you must have a response to such autistic writing such that you have witnessed today; surely if it's so far beneath your level of intellect, debunking any false narratives will be simple for such a great mind.
Excuse my belated response, I am intimidated by your wisdom and ability to communicate. Please tell me, what do I need in order to speak with such grace and charisma? Is it simply a matter of drinking mountain dew equivalent to my weight every day, or is there more?
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
Love what? The triple paren? Classic move, easily identifies the part of your speech you think matters most. It's like what bold normally does except for people that are mostly brain dead.
Im sorry, but did you refer to me as retarded and brain dead multiple times?
This TMOR shtick is tiring. We get it, you dont like other ideas. You wont stamp them out, no matter how much hypocritical assistance is given. How much of a serious fucking loser does one have to be, to be interested in that "hobby?"
Its pretty fucking weird from my POV, like borderline mental illness. Especially if one is so delusional that they think participating in TMOR brigades puts them on the "winning" side. They are like the kid that fucked your mom on Xbox. We all know they are here, but who really fucking cares? You all just get muted.
You stated you are not a big fan, yet you post there? Color me confused. You also stated, you love the triple parentheses. That in itself is quintessential TMOR. Their sub AFAIK started that trend. Color me even more confused.
In other words, you can type out 'I hate that place', but your actions speak louder. And then you just look like a liar. Even worse..
If you voice your support for triple parantheses, then you are supporting the sub and their targeted harassment. Relatively simple conclusion from a brain dead conspiratard...
Can we come together and find more creative ways to say retarded? I really like your inclusion of 'tard' in 'conspiracy'. I can start a google doc and we can add to it whenever we have a good thought.
I think you're paying it on a little too thick. You're way too upset and defensive about a sub you've "never been to" before. It's pretty clear you're trying to appear as an uninvolved observer
Not really hard to figure out this one. If you put together a forum for the specific purpose of discussing a topic and it gets inundated daily with people who are there specifically to PREVENT discussion, jettisoning the people who are there for no other purpose than to shut down discussion is logical.
Deleting the forum because you just don't like the topic is ridiculous.
I didn't claim they were true or false, just stating the reasons stated by the ban message on the subs at the time i posted it. Mostly because i was curious if the reasons would changed later.
They get a pass because they don't actually incite violence, they just paint a picture of how retarded some of these users truly are. They never ask to lunch anyone, they never push to doxx people and they never push for real violence. At best they ask for bans and for subs to be removed.
TMOR doesn't ask for an uprising, for killing of people or doxxing, they just make fun of you retards is all.
Its like all your doing is coming over to this sub and harassing its users. Seems like TMOR incites harassment. A reason that two of those subs were banned.
A sub for discussing topics not always agreed upon? You mean questioning statements of people and always questions in what's real?
Where am I? Oh that's right. A conspiracy sub that teaches to question everything right? I suppose I could just blindly follow all fo your statements and the statements of everyone else?
I also didn't land here through TMOR. I appreciate the sub for pointing our hilarity, but by no means do I just follow their statements.
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
Kind of strange that all Q subs at the same time were all in violation of something and banned. Hmmm... sounds more like Reddit is trying to censor & suppress information. Right before Midterms, I foresee more censorship and banning on Reddit and elsewhere.
i was on GA for 8+ hours a day. Never once saw doxxing or anything other than "X should hang" type comments, which were immediately deleted and user banned
Yeah but you and your sick ilk kept fucking posting dog whistle racist posts, and other shit meant to identify "the enemy". And seeing how fond of being terrorists you all are, it was only a matter if time before you did something highly illegal thanks to a subreddit
Don't use words I don't understand or I'll call Q to eviscerate you with his patriot sword crafted from the tears of a thousand autists during the great tendie genocide of 2018!
Everything is blanket racism to you people. It's why the world is rejecting your ideology. If anything this action by Reddit is going to have the opposite effect.
When they said "the enemy" they meant people like you based on rhetoric, not race, no matter how hard you try to spin it. The worlds waking up to this kind of stuff.
Your movement is just the occupy wall Street movement with extra steps. One of which is racism. It's not new, nor is it esoteric. It's just new to you.
There's not some revolution happening. It's more like when someone reposts a meme for the hundredth time and it still gets a 70, 000 up votes from people who haven't seen it before.
It's not "my movement". If life had taught me anything it is that groups that get ostracized that steadfastly might just have something interesting to say. Given online is all filter/content bubbles anymore, I actively seek out is being suppressed. It usually makes for fun reading.
At this point on the internet, with the amount of fake atroturfed bullshit everywhere, I like to look for the logic behind smears. What was their message? Patriotism, positivity, and unity seemed to be the general vibe that I took away.
On the flip side you have nothing but posts like yours shouting it down calling it a larp. One message is negative one is positive.
Patriotism, positivity, and unity seemed to be the general vibe that I took away.
They believe a satanic pedophile illumanti ring secretly runs the United States. That’s not patriotism, it’s paranoid schizophrenia.
Their positivity is the delusion that Q is going to turn America into their imagined idillic version of America. Q has been purposefully vague about this so his followers can imagine whatever positive outcome they want.
They only seek to unify right-wing Christians. Atheists, queers, and progressives have no place in Q’s America. They are the enemies of the Qult.
If that is really the “vibe” you took away from GA, I honestly recommend you look into the Satanic Moral Panic of the 90s.
What you people aren't seeing is that shouting down anyone questioning the mainstream narratives is getting shouted down and banned everywhere online. It's having the opposite effect you're hoping for. It's making them look pretty validated and putting fuel behind the "paranoid schizophrenia".
You're saying people hoping for a better world are crazy, and using Wikipedia of all places to validate your point in support of the suppression of ideas. Keep your head down and don't question anything on /r/Conspiracy !
You're saying people hoping for a better world are crazy
Their idea of a better world is one where only Christians exist. I don’t exist in their ideal world.
That’s fine though. They can want me to not exist. The problem is that if Q said ______ was a pedophile, all his followers would descend upon that person and dox and threaten them. See @s8n. These people didn’t question that twitter Satan was a part of the satanic pedophile plot, because Q told them he was.
If you can look at all the threats @s8n received after Q said he was a pedophile, with no proof, and believe that is something Reddit should endorse, or is “patriotism,” and “positive,” I don’t know what to tell you. Qanon was a imagined pedophile witch hunt weaponizing right-wing boomers against the left.
You say it was about unity but it was feeding its audience a narrative of ultimate dis-unity. How can these people ethically compromise with someone they believe to be a satanic pedophile that just wants to undermine everything they believe in?
There’s a line, and Qanon was created on the wrong side. Just abusing their influence over gullible idiots. They’ve been straight up wrong about so much. Q said, a year ago, that Hillary Clinton was already in custody. Or at least that’s how people interpreted it. That’s the problem. Qanon is set up in a way in which the followers will justify anything because they’re fighting against the ultimate enemy, literally the embodiment of evil on earth, the biblical Satan. Qanon, has to be right because otherwise Satan wins. It doesn’t matter if it’s all a lie.
You know pamphlet anon outed himself as Q on CBTS_Stream twice, right? He was logged into the Q tripcode. It’s all a hoax, preying on Christian boomer’s psychological vulnerabilities and weaponizing their ideological fears against whoever pamphlet anon chooses. And then people show up with a gun at a pizza shop or a dam and demand they release the child sex slaves.
Like holy shit, learn to recognize a psy-op. This shit deserves to be deleted from the internet.
As for the idea that deplatforming leads to signal boosting, that’s been proven false. I won’t even mention the names of the failures who were kicked off every platform years ago and have no online presence at all anymore. We’ll see how Alex ends up as he has a pretty large audience, and I want to know if he can keep those numbers up, post-deplatforming, because no one else has.
It's easy to make claims of all this evil shit you refer to, like them "wanting to get rid of everything except christians" existing which I never saw there. It's also easy to plaster a wall of strawman examples that can be disproven as they banned the entire subreddit.
Link the Q drop from 8chan (which is the ONLY place he posts)that says he's [poor oppressed s8n] a pedophile. They linked actual posts by that guy saying all kinds of fucked up shit that you hand wave away. Before you ask me to provide proof, your pro censorship pals deleted it.
Posts like the novel you just typed perfectly illustrate the danger of censorship/deplatforming. Once you've been alive long enough to events get rewritten over time you'll understand. Now that the subreddit is gone, people can let fly all sorts of crazy rhetoric about how evil it was an form a false narrative. They can do this because they had to delete the proof to make the claims of such evil credible. Otherwise joereddituserbaconlvr12 could just go there and see what it was all about. Now they can't, and people like you can apply your narrative to the past.
“Now that the subreddit is gone, people can let fly all sorts of crazy rhetoric about how evil it was an form a false narrative. They can do this because they had to delete the proof to make the claims of such evil credible.”
Thank you, I never thought of it like this. It reminds me of pizzagate days when you would direct someone to look at something on voat and they would refuse to visit that site because it had porn on it or something. They would argue against pizzagate religiously and always come up with a reason as to why they wouldn’t look at evidence. And yet still they would argue. It’s about creating a narrative not examining facts
Really? Politics is chalked full of that shit and makes racists comments all fucking day. Yet it's a fucking default sub. This censorship is fine. Regulation will come to support free speech and there will be no Russian Collusion or impeachment. Have your short lived day for now. Your life will be a fucking nightmare in a year once you actually see how many people think opposite of you.
Currently a 3rd year State police officer and our chief doesn't sit around on reddit... Go figure. Some of us actually have a job to do, not just report to an office that won't fire them due to time served. There's no sitting around for us.
"Agreed 100%. I still want to know if any of the pharaohs were Caucasian for example but that news would never escape the history handlers in Egypt :("
Is that supposed to help your case? A public website that can be edited by anyone to say literally anything? I guess laziness is the least of your problems. Carry on.
8 hours a day and you don't remember it, really now? I don't believe you, but this is a refresher for anyone else interested
Your sub doxxed the Twitter account @s8n account after Q claimed it was being run by "big names." As it turns out it was just a normal 24 year old kid shitposting and he even came onto your sub to complain about being doxxed.
Well I'm not here to convince you, you are clearly off the deep end. But for anyone else interested in the doxing and harassment, the link documenting everything is above. Sadly since the sub is banned, most of the links in the sub are bogus but you can find archived pages if you are interested.
Why are you blatantly attacking him and making him out to be dishonest? Is it that crazy to think that he just doesn't recall what you're talking about or didn't see it?
Because the guy is claiming to be on the subreddit for 8 hours a day. The s8n was very much discussed on that subreddit with people targeting that twitter account based off the "Q drop".
He just said that he knew the account was “connected with pedos.” It’s just some 24 year old running a spoof account. Saying he’s “connected to pedos” means this user is aware of the harassment, or at least the reason for it.
Just because this one user decided not to harass the account “connected with pedos,” doesn’t mean that the sub he spent 8hrs a day on didn’t propagated the idea that the account was “connected with pedos,” to a group of people that harassed people they imagined were pedophiles.
There is ZERO evidence that is true. The moderators contacted him apologizing for any harassment and asked him for screenshots so they could investigate who was responsible. The person was not able to produce a single shred of evidence pointing back to /r/greatawakening, contrary to his claims.
The users of great awakening became convinced that the owner of the twitter handle @s8n was a 'big player' because Q told them so. Turns out it was some random 20 something guy that they kept doxcing and harassing.
I have been on the GA sub and following Q (even though IDK if it is larp or not)...and I've never heard of "s8n" ...nor have I ever seen any violence or bullying. IMHO the sub got compromised:
Either it is a larp, and the people running the larp purposefully doxed and harassed so as to get the sub banned, to add credibility
May or may not be a larp, but those in opposition to it infiltrated it, and false-flagged (acted as though on its behalf in doxing someone).
How much do they pay you to do this? --or are you so soul-less that you do it for free? Tell us, do you work for share blue or are you simply part of the JIDF network? Or maybe you simply have Trump-derangement syndrome? Pretty obvious some kind of politic is blocking your reading comprehension.
Did you think I didn't notice how you deflected away from answering my question? Good try, but we're not dumb enough to fall for your rhetorical tricks.
users of greatawakening and other q followeres harrased a guy on twitter with the name @s8n because q linked to his account. When he complained on r/greatawakening the mods deleted all his comments.
Confirming this is a prime example of abuse of banning. Its the ministry of truth / wrongthink in practice. I find it funny all these people acting like they deserved the ban and are defending the action and the fact this is the conspiracy sub. Regulation of thoughts is popular now!
This sub was never like this until around the time Trump was elected. I've even discussed it with mods here and they agree. Look at the detractors, and the subs they post in (or how their posts are limited solely to here)
Oh save your self-righteous indignation. There are people that spend 8+ hours a day on any major subreddit. I'm not saying that's healthy, but it is a fact.
The constant "God bless you", "Pray for Trump", Bible verses everywhere, etc, didn't bother you? I followed for awhile but once it got overly Christian I was out.
Sure, it bothered me sometimes, but I can tolerate differences in opinion on religion. I spoke out about it sometimes and sometimes I got a positive response from the community. Sometimes it was negative. It was a mixed bag with a variety of biases and beliefs.
Yeah a cult is when a man of color supports a party opposite of his cults ideology and gets publically shamed. A cult is when people donate money to criminals that will get indicted like McCabe and Strzok. A cult censors anyone who disagrees with their opinion. Sound familiar? Denial is the 1st step.
Isolating members and penalizing them for leaving.
Suppressing criticism by censoring outsider views, theories and opinions. Often creating new rules of correctness and punishment and shaming cyles to those that do not follow.
I'll agree that these are SOME attributes of a cult. You are forgetting that they are critical of general opinion (otherwise these can be applied to any group). If you disagree, remember that realizing you are in denial is the first step (FTFY).
Liberals even donated money via gofundme to McCabe and Strozok who will be convicted and in prison. Yet you claim this can be applied to any group. Stay in denial bro
I'm just replying to the properties you listed. If your going to redefine words be careful about including yourself in it. Just a bit of advice. Feel free to ignore it if you desire to remain ignorant.
information showing that left-wing operatives including an employee of CBS have been involved in posing as Trump supporters to post offensive anonymous content on Reddit in order to get pro-Trump subreddits flagged.
Some satire Twitter account mentioned pizza a couple times over the course of several years so OF COURSE that means its a part of the pizzagate conspiracy.
Yeah, that's the rigorous investigation that the Qult is known for
It's hard to sort fact from fiction with all of this, but the guy was getting tons of hate mail and death threats. When he went to GA to try and reason with them the mods asked for evidence then deleted his posts with the evidence. Then they said he never provided evidence.
The “reason” for the doxing was to harass him. When they found out he was a 24 year old kid, connected to nobody, they didn’t stop. Q said he was connected so therefore he is connected, no evidence needed. Get your pitchforks. Kill the satanic pedophile cult member.
They found out where he lived and sent him pictures with crosshairs over house. That was after they knew who he was. After they knew he was a nobody. Because he can’t be a nobody cause Q said so.
Quick question since that post originated from 8chan, what makes you think It violated redits TOS, or even twitters ? This is some "Ministry of Truth -1984" level of suppression here ... hopefully you never question the narrative and actually wake up else your next..
Reddit should be forced to show the evidence and reason for a ban especially large subs with lots of activity. If the reason for the ban is on political reason then the ban is invalid and a lie.
As i said show the reasons for the ban, I am on there enough to know in general how the board is run and I did not see things that would result in a board level ban.
Well I would say with your feet leave the platform. It happened to Myspace and digg. Hilarious so much downvotes when all I said was show the reason for the banning. Shills or useful idiots love the conspiracy board.
It would be nice if there were some form of justice, instead of just fascism, even if it is "privately owned". These companies like to act all democratic...until something goes against their narrative.
Oy vey! Look at the hilarious goyim! Jidf is not real. Share Blue is not real. David Brock memo = not real. Go back to sleep goyim. You are very tired. I think I am going to slide under some warm blankets for a nice long nap, and then when I get up I will stay off reddit and live a productive life.
Are you anti-Semitic? I happen to be a Jew who doesn't stand for the zionist *%$&# that half my nation spews. To deny JIDF, share blue, CTR, etc, is the mark of a tool.
information showing that left-wing operatives including an employee of CBS have been involved in posing as Trump supporters to post offensive anonymous content on Reddit in order to get pro-Trump subreddits flagged.
TheBanOut is a political operation and the power mods are the useful idiots of the admins.
The great awakening was growing exponentially - up to 70k subs. We were celebrating 40k like a month ago. It really was the only place on reddit to discuss the fallout from things like the FISA abuse scandal (which was considered a crazy conspiracy 6 months ago and is unequivocal fact now) and the CIA/DOJ/FBI collusion against Trump.
They had to take it down, but if they just banned that subreddit the censorship would be obvious in media coverage. They needed cover. So they found a bunch of unsavoury subs to create an association and a 'movement' to keep focus from what they were really targeting.
They didn't list it on the subreddit for this reason, so the SJW narrative would be established publicly first, and then great awakening would be caught up in it.
Do you really think they care about violence given no one is touching ANTIFA speech? Do you really think they care about these SJW issues? They've created tools to enact political censorship in the name of morality.
Im sure the real number of subscribers is exponentially higher than 70K. Im sure they have manipulated our subscriber numbers just like theyve manipulated everything else. I saw somewhere the real number was 297K, but I dont know how true that is.
That subreddit is disturbing in a way I can't quite put my finger on. Sure some of the subreddits that have been banned where pretty shitty places but idk the whole thing seems dirty and wrong.
Globalist fascism currently inhabits the left like a puppet (like they did the neo cons during the bush years) and projects everything it is and is doing onto everyone else.
Probably because you literally have to comment "I fully support banout 2018" in any one of the very few posts, or your comment gets automatically deleted.
Also, it blatantly violates Reddit rules. I'm almost positive it's a joint effort, enabled by the leaders of Reddit, in coordination with all other Social Media outlets to censor modern conservatism viewpoints into the 2018 Midterms.
Reddit bans don’t work the same as twitter bans dude. Mass flagging subreddits does nothing. Reddit hesitantly bans subreddits after internal discussion.
1) Create sockpuppet accounts 2) Post hateful, brigadiering, doxxing comments 3) Report subreddit, citing your own sockpuppet account
while step 1-2-3 are ongoing expect brigadiering down-voting. r/againsthatesubreddits and r/thebanout2018 they really fucked up and messed with a board of people who do allot of research and have brought so much to light did they really think they could do this and not get caught :P
The banout is a troll sub lmao. How do you people not get this? If they actually had these sockpuppet accounts all the posts there wouldn’t be downvoted. For a group of hyper-online loonies you sure are easy to bait.
So the list without strikeouts does not mean anything, seriously dude i am one of the least gullible people you will ever meet, my bullshit detectors are very active. It is not a troll site... its a planning site (landing page) I have done this same thing with a clan I ran (to give a list of targets) except I knew how to do it properly.
The mods of greatawakening were supporting there used doxxing the @s8tan guy from twitter. Full articles linked all over with his personal info from some blog while deleting posts of the actual guy asking them to please stop harassing him. Stop pretending the doxxing and calls to violence weren’t from members of the sub. We all saw that shit.
What if I told you the people advocating for the bans are the ones with the power to ban them? what if I told you all they needed was an excuse to get away with it?
What are you talking about? If the people who wanted to ban these subreddits could, they would’ve done it ages ago. They’ve had an “excuse” since forever.
Would not mass flagging subreddits using bots make the owners of reddit more likely to look at the subreddots, and even more take them down as a result?
All the subs that get banned are pretty large. Reddit is a massive company, and bans take a lot of internal discussion. They would’ve been looking at these subs already, for months.
So why does this subreddit just show up now as the bans begin happening? And for the phases, how come they put something on there and it gets banned later on?
N8TheGr8 made a subreddit to troll right wing people. He only updates the list after subreddits are banned. Reddit bans aren’t done through mass flagging like twitter, so how could they even ban subreddits anyway? Right wing people are falling for a troll and it’s very funny.
It’s more trolling. They picked subs that are slightly more likely to be banned than others so they might be right in their guess. They’ve edited the lists before anyway, not like it matters.
Probably because they were posting progressively violent fantasies against politicians/celebrities and trying to egg each other on without crossing the line.
It was basically playing "I'm not touching you!" With the sites hate speech policies
Share your evidence that GA violated terms. Oh wait, you can’t. Weird how you hold others to standards that don’t apply to yourself. Please stop feigning ignorance, it’s painfully obvious to everyone but yourself and maybe a few of the braindead, brainwashed goons who follow you. Keep denying what’s obvious, like a foolish ass, so everyone can see. You’re doing wonders for your ideals.
Most of the people who commit political based violence that I read about these days are on the left. Rand paul, the republican baseball game, antifa and their antics. Maxine waters?? All this hate over Trump. Where are the right wingers?? I'm libertarian not right or left.
It seems their ideology aligns with EA's design team... yet they boycott their games, lol.
The mods/admins behind these mass bannings should get together with EA and have a spirit cookout. They can have one giant transgender orgy. They should also invite those journalists who write racist articles about the indigenous European race.
They were doxing people with the help of the mods even when that person was being sent death threats by their members, “Q” was also directly referencing that sub, just got all too dangerous, some random cunt was being allowed to radicalise people
This is a possible reason but it just got downvoted to zero below a thousand posts so I'll re-paste it here:
Lt_Bear13 • 8m
I was checking out TopMindsOfReddit and they are claiming anything Q related was banned because these people who were getting accused of being 'pizzagate' are getting death threats. I wonder if there is anything to this? I'm currently looking into it. (P.S. I know topmindsof reddit is an anti-conspiracy reddit. I check out their sources, arguments, and posts; even though I find them rude and immature.)
"SkynetJusticeWarri0rI downvote first, ask questions later. • 1h
This is just one reason why the QAnon subs got banned. On the 12th of August a user on 8Chan posted a vague and cryptic message linking a satirical twitter account to a "global network of baby eating demonic pedophiles". But this wasn't just any 8Chan user, radicalized reddit users consider this to be "drop" from "QAnon" a person they believe to a prophet.
This message exploded through the QAnon network on reddit, where the movement is primarily based. This 'message from Q' was by design an incendiary bomb that was to be widely disseminated to the “Q believers”. This directly lead to owner of the twitter account being targeted and receiving hundreds of threatening messages sent by Q followers.
If you think that QAnon has nothing to do with Reddit. Then you would be gravely mistaken. r/Greatawakening is of such importance to the “Q Movement” that they were directly referenced by “QAnon” in the most recent “drop”.
These subs are becoming more radicalized and more emboldened every day. They openly mark their harassment as “Q sent me”. This hysteria is escalating, and it won’t stop until someone is dead. QAnon is Pizzagate, and it is as every bit as hysterical, deranged and dangerous. The QAnon subreddits are extremist training grounds. They not only promote the radicalization of their users, but unapologetically incite them to commit violent acts. This incendiary bomb was heavily promoted on several subreddits.
The reddit QAnon platform on reddit resulted in the twitter user “S8n” receiving 200+ threats from enraged Q “cultists”. This harassment can be easily found on his twitter account.
We at the TMoR have confirmed that u/itss8n the owner of the @s8n twitter account that was targeted, and he personally reported the harassment to the moderators of the main QAnon subreddit r/GreatAwakening, but they refused to remove the offending post claiming there was "no evidence" of the user being harassed. Instead they deleted his posts begging them to remove their multiple stickied threads about him, even though he explicitly stated he was receiving threats. They then officially then encouraged further harassment, and also provided an article containing his personal details.
Let me repeat that: they shared his personal details – when they knew he was getting death threats from their own users.
u/itss8n : Leave me alone. - REMOVED BY THEIR MODS. u/itss8n : “I got harassed all day yesterday being accused of being a fucking child sex trafficker... do you have any idea what that’s fucking like, to be accused of something so vile because of a 3 year old tweet about a fucking PIZZA. Do you realise how insane that sounds.” - REMOVED BY THEIR MODS. incite : to move to action : stir up : spur on : urge on
Examples of incite in a Sentence
The news incited widespread fear and paranoia.
the rock band's failure to show up incited a riot, as the crowd had waited for hours
You don't have to explicitly direct people to action, in order to "incite" them. Implying that someone is being a satanic pedophile who murders children and part of an unholy opposition is a direct incitement to violence.
Did the "Q" Post incite users into send death threats. Demonstrably, yes it did.
Did those subs promote a message proven to incite their users into making violent threats. Demonstrably, yes it did.
Did those subs refuse to remove the offending threads after being informed that the user was received death threats, yes they are still promoting these threads.
This message stickied and promoted by the QAnon subs provably directly led to death threats and harassment. And yet none of these subs removed the offending posts.
We have contacted the mods of these subreddits, but with the indisputable proof, but prior to their banning, all of these posts were still publicly available. The only response we received was from the Mods of The_GreatAwakening who told me that caring about death threats made me “of no value to society”. And the mods of GreatAwakening muted me.
r/GreatAwakening
1859: Satan twitter account
Q:1859"This Twitter acct was referenced for a very specific reason. HOLDS many 'questionable' messages from people of power/influence. These accounts are run by BIG NAMES."
INTERESTING Satan twitter.com/s8n - various references
Results to investigation into subscribers claim of receiving "death threats" because of Qdrop #1859 Q!!mG7VJxZNCI
Satan Twitter account is run by a 24 year old. Q... what the hell? Pun intended.
These subs were also involved in the harassment:
r/the_GreatAwakening
Q Post 1859 - "Satan" Twitter account: I miss you son @realDonaldTrump Q: This Twitter acct was referenced for a very specific reason. HOLDS many 'questionable' messages from people of power/influence. These accounts are run by BIG NAMES. Q1859 @s8n - some names s8n instagram followers r/DrainTheSwamp
Patriots! We have the enemy scared and scurrying to delete any incriminating tweets from bad actors. I urge you all to DIG. We need to know who our enemies are. Find the tweets and expose them! ThanQ
Q posted this Account asked who was in control of these people and it’s obvious it’s Satan~ ~ Pray People ~ if you see Satan you can’t deny God ~ and God loves you!!
Similar posts:
An open letter to the Reddit Admins: Why don't you take death threats seriously? The Mods of r/GreatAwakening stickied a post calling for the targeted harassment of a twitter user. The result? Hundreds of threats sent directly to the user. When the individual directly reported the harassment to them, they claimed there was "no evidence”… Here is proof of 100+ threats. Don’t let the r/The_Donald and r/conspiracy distance themselves from QAnon and Qult. They are complicit in the explosion of hysteria and stupidity. They believe pretty much the exact same conspiracies and everything they read on 4chan. [Huge Effortpost] I've documented the harassment/doxxing campaign of /r/GreatAwakening users against the twitter user @S8n. I believe this is an intentional act of malice perpetuated by the mods there. I implore you guys to read and report this to the Admins. EDIT: Updated the context of this comment"
They are falling over themselves to justify what is fundamentally a blatant act of censorship. I could likewise argue that support of Hillary is a cult as believers refuse to even acknowledge that uranium 1 ever happened, and this deluded cult leads to punch a Nazi campaigns and antifa. Hillary called trump supporters deplorables, and the words from one of those post “You don't have to explicitly direct people to action, in order to "incite" them.” We really need to ban all left wing subreddits to put an end to violence in our streets and people being physically attacked for their choice of hat
Exactly. You could find plenty of people accusing regular folks of being genocidal Nazis and wishing death upon them and Trump and all that kind of crazy shit.
Also, like gamergate, people use "death threats" to silence the people they don't like when they in actuality sent the the threat to themselves.
I disagree with the Q premise generally speaking but they weren't violent or even particularly aggressive verbally from what I saw.
How do you know it was abrupt? For all we know the admins have been in contact with the sub mods for weeks/months. In the majority of cases with banned subs the admins have been trying to get the mods to take action for a while but nothing changes, eventually resulting in a ban.
Well I'm going to go ahead and assume that this large scale banning of subs didn't involve meticulous discussions with the mods of each one. But yeah, fair point I guess..
Oh yeah I totally keep screenshots of comments I report that were made 3 weeks ago. It wasn't shit like "we should kill people" it was usually for dog whistles for "action".
Either way right now in this thread it's me saying "I've seen it" and you saying "I haven't seen it".
So a few comments means a sub will get banned? Funny how r/ politics is still around then... constant calls for violence against the President and Republicans.
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I checked out the Twitter link and there is no evidence of any threats. Satan gave statement that no threats came from TGA or Reddit. I have given "Satan" more than enough time to provide evidence to support his claim. I have check all available sources that might support his claim and found nothing. Although I cannot be sure the subreddit user, Satan, is the same person as the s8n Twitter account, I can be sure that the claims of "death Threats" are false. Making false claims about a crime/rule violation is just as serious as if the crime/violation had taken place. This investigation is a good example of that. The mods will address this issue.
Sounds like the mods were addressing the issue. A far cry from what you are claiming.
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
Dude 80% of that sub was people who were 50+ and barely knew how to use the internet. A lot of the posts were essentially email forwards from grandma. Everyone once in a while there would be a "drop" and then serious posting would happen. 12 hours later it was back to praying (literally) and pictures of Q boomer crafts. They even shouted down partisan talk as the concept was "wake people up to corruption". If there was talk of violence it was shills making it look that way.
No, it isn't. It makes perfect sense. If it was controlled opposition, they wouldn't instruct reddit to ban them, and would probably instruct reddit to make sure they were not banned. Since they were banned, we can infer a high probability that it is not controlled opposition.
You sound an awful lot like the other damage control comments in here, including the admins slapping gold on people literally attacking the sub.
Your argument works either way. It's an absurd premise that can only be proven in support of Q knowing everything or whatever exactly it is. There is no evidence that could even hypothetically prove you wrong because it's always part of a 'grand plan'.
Youre right that the idea that q is controlled opposition is nonsense. The idea that q is either a larp or deliberate pro trump disinformation is not nonsense however.
That happened, but what's the evidence that there was instruction by a third party? Keep in mind I'm not starting from the position that the "deep state" is concerned with random Reddit users.
They talked about catholic pedophiles quite a bit with regards to current events surrounding the Vatican. They were anti terror in regards to all terrorists. explain how it was a hotbed of domestic terrorism.
They didn't ban Q, they banned a subreddit discussing him. They also banned the previous one, r/CBTS_stream 6 months ago. r/CBTS_stream had 20k users, r/greatawakening had 60k users. If the intent was to ban all discussion of Q, I'm not sure why they would wait 6 months and let the group grow 3 times larger before banning it.
Not really. If it was a danger, it would have made more sense to break things up before they got big. By letting it grow it allowed people to create relationships offsite and other sites for discussion/research. 60k people with a similar interest can regroup elsewhere (guessing Voat?), though will likely lose a lot. 2/3k people with a similar interest that get their community frequently broken up will find it hard to regroup.
Again, they don't give a fuck about conscious people getting together. They let me post the deepest darkest secrets in mid-size subs without much trouble. The threat is when you get a large enough number that the barely conscious join in and the unconscious start to wake up. Which is exactly what is happening with Q anon right now.
Then why aren't they banning threads like this? Or the 5 other submissions about this subject on the front page of /r/conspiracy? Or the comments in the thread that mention alternatives. It seems like a very noisy way to shut down discussion that will draw a lot of attention, as well as convince Q believers that MSM is censoring him out of fear.
Because maybe having a group of people who call for the arrests and military trial of notable politicians and business leaders on the basis that they're all pedophilic cannibalistic satan worshippers is a bad look to advertisers and the general public.
Surprised it didn't happen earlier. The veiled threats and the occasional "can't wait for the killing to start"-type posts being lauded, couldn't have worked in their favor.
I didn't argue it was
I said it supported racists, racist ideals, and promoted racism. Which is ban worthy. These are but a few examples from last week
Surprised it didn't happen earlier. The veiled threats and the occasional "can't wait for the killing to start"-type posts being lauded, couldn't have worked in their favor.
You were asked to provide evidence that this "happens every day" and your evidence is Breitbart articles and Ben Garrison cartoons? Get the fuck out of here.
If he actually committed treason, then why would that not be celebrated? There was always a baseline understanding that they better have really fucking solid proof and videotaped confessions to boot if they are going as far as secret tribunals. In the end though, that's something UCMJ is supposed to be used for if it is being used in the context of war against a legitimate threat to our nation, e.g. a secret global criminal cabal infiltrating the US system.
That depends entirely on the classified evidence presented in the tribunal. If he's done something truly heinous and committed treason and they have the proof, then I don't care what kind of image he has.
Notice how everything I'm saying is hypothetical?
If it can be proven that there was a treasonous plot to overthrow the American system, and if it can be proven that people like John McCain or George (W) Bush or Barrack Obama were complicit, then I really don't care what methods they use to stop them. This is all if they are able to prove they were acting out of necessity. In times of war, the President actually does get Constitutional authority to bend the rules in pretty much any way.
The celebration is all hypothetical based on the premise that the truth will be revealed to the public and it will be undeniable, e.g. videotaped confessions and more. UCMJ has a pretty high standard of evidence. They just don't fuck around once they have established treason.
If it turns out that they did these secret things with flimsy evidence, even the most hardcore Q follower would be in the streets protesting.
Yeah like Q said attack’s with get worse and come from all directions. Smart move by the deep state to basically cut our comms and now push the narrative we are violent so we can’t defend ourselves.
If this isn’t a fucking Q proof I don’t know what is.
I have frequently checked in on that sub, and didn't see any significant threats. Not even close to what you see in feminist or "fuck the alt right" subs.
I honestly believe that larp or not, the lefties in charge simply did not want the sentiments of that sub being contagious.
I dunno... I didn't frequent it but I did visit sometimes out of curiosity. There were definitely posts calling for death to certain people (Hillary, Obama [or Hussein as they started calling him], McCain [who they started calling 'no name'] prior to him dying, etc)
Those sites work if someone archived it. Other sites like removeddit and ceddit don't seem to be displaying anything.
As for that other sub, I don't know anything about it but from a quick glance it definitely doesn't look like a healthy sub. Unlike GA, it doesn't look worth reading.
I don’t get this line of thinking. The alt-right has taken a stance with actual nazis, we have to be intolerant of intolerance. Q-guys are advocating violence against people because of conspiracy theories. You can’t equate those two. In my opinion, someone who advocates for violence against others due to race, creed, etc deserves to be punched more than someone who “maybe did something” because you played detective and strung together a bunch of random shit to fit your narrative. Not that I see that type of talk on r/FuckTheAltRight anyways, just saying that if I did, I understand it more.
Q-guys are advocating violence against people because of conspiracy theories
No they weren't. Talking about indictments "around the corner" or even military tribunals, however misguided it may be, is not a "call or incitement of violence. They were talking about political and legal processes they think will happen or would like to see happen. That isn't advocating anyone go murder or inflict criminal violence on anyone.
I saw plenty of comments on there related to stockpiling weapons in prep for what they seemed to think is a coming civil war and hanging politicians for deep-state related treason. THAT’S what I’m referring to. And that’s why they were banned.
Putting aside for a second that you can easily find crazies who say stupid shit on any subreddit and particularly political subs.
That explanation flies out the window when you look at the list of subs they banned. They even banned Q subs with only two people allowed to submit (meaning there were exactly zero offending posts).
Dude. Never has a “I can’t wait for the killing to start.” Been posted. That had to be one of the best and honestly moderated subs with any “conspiracy” relation. I went there because it was more realistic than the forum sliding and utter garbage going on in this sub. This sub, used to promote freedom of thought, now its mostly and purposely right wing/alt right to support a made up theory that only the right = conspiracy theories.
The great awakening, even if it was a larp, banded a group of honest, independently thinking, and justice wanting individuals, who PROMOTED not being violent.
That is more dangerous to those in charge than us being excited for the FISA to drop. The FISA doesn’t even compare to comradery of nonviolent vigilance and promotion of the freedom to think differently.
PUBLICLY. It''s WAY PAST TIME for the millions of morons to wake up to the murders that they've helped facilitate. I'm only willing to let the accessories off the hook if they finally repudiate the leftards vociferously and violently.
Soldiers lost because of deep state, they better hope she is lock up soon. Because she is a walking target in my book. I tell you this she will be (x) out.
Check out subs like r/anarchism and r/latestagecapitalism for a good laugh/cry. You'll have people there talk about murdering "elites" all the fucking time (by elites they mean anyone with more money than them)
Now, I'm not a Trump supporter, or a supporter of any politician, but after Trump won, I started taking tons of screenshots of the blatant incitement of violence and harassment against Trump/Trump supporters on politics and various other subreddits.
Anyway, that one was one of the worst and made my stomach feel like a pit of snakes knowing actual people think this way, regardless of who its about.
I'm honestly not sure / can't remember / can't see on my feed. Definitely nothing sensational, best guess was a denial of the racism or some cliche derogatory remark.
No, I googled it, because I don’t just look at some random post on Reddit (or the news, or social media) and blindly believe it without doing my own research.
The fact that you don't know which ones are real, are too lazy to find out, but still insist on casually dehumanizing someone speaks volumes. Calling everything and everyone racist without justification is foolish blind hatred. You're just projecting your fear and ignorance onto the rest of the world. Stop it.
Racism is an extension of xenophobia buddy. There's your fear and ignorance.
As long as at least one is real, it shows he's racist. And the fact you think otherwise shows your racist. I'd say remove yourself from the gene pool, but I suspect you already have done so involuntarily.
The first comic is the only real one. It was posted in November 2015, the month of the Paris terror attacks which claimed 130 lives. Around this time Obama was being criticized for pulling support from moderate allies like Ghadaffi and Mubarak, and for helping radical jihadists in Syria, who ultimately planned the attacks. Garrison was standing up to radical bullies and criticizing Obama's foreign policy. But you didn't know that because I must be ignorant.
The others three are made by rebellious teens on 4chan who delight in tossing poisonous breadcrumbs to starved social justice warriors like yourself. The sad thing is, no one really hates anyone more than the left hates the right. Your hatred is for the people you live and work with on a daily basis, who happen to have a problem with having their free speech curtailed by people who cry while bullying you into silence.
The sad thing is, no one really hates anyone more than the left hates the right.
RDI of Hannity and Tucker Carlson exceeded.
At best, the Obama one is hiding behind the bullshit narrative you just espoused in order to be a dog whistle to racists like yourself.
I've seen examples like all of these posted on TheDonald and GA plenty of times. So we've concluded that GA and TheDonald are racist AND perpetuate fake news (breaking news!!!), and that Ben Garrison is their homeboy.
IDK about you but if a bunch of red neck racists were supporting the things I was doing, I would think twice about what it is I'm doing.
Imagine sucking spez cock so much that you are in favor of censorship. So many calls for violence happen every day in politics and it reigns supreme. This is clearly political censorship.
This is what I don’t get, If there truly “above the target” what is the point of these coded communications anyway? Why care that the sub is shutdown, if it’s all happening “soon”? Why the need to “red pill” everyone around you, if the truth is about to be revealed?
It’s clearly a need to feel special and important. From a logistical stand point, the existence of the sub never made any sense.
That murderous attitude might indeed engulf some on the 'right' but at this moment the 'left' is far more hateful and vengeful in physical reality because of their hate for trump, which has been programmed into them by the media just like WMD's and "Osama did it". Mainstream democrat politicans are calling for conservatives to be harassed on the streets (Maxine waters). Rand Paul was physically attacked by someone on the 'left.' Antifa hits people with bike locks and their own poop. People wearing Trump hats are open targets for harassment. Are you on the 'left' so you're okay with it or don't notice it? Even half the people in this post, no doubt on the 'left', celebrate censorship because it helps them. No ethics or values.
A "righty" drove over and killed someone during a right-wing rally meant to "unite" everything from dull-as-dishwater republicans to outright nazis. 70% of all terrorist attacks in the United States are (still) committed by the extreme right. A bunch of self-proclaimed "crusaders" got their sentencing a few months back, for plotting to massacre a mosque.
The extreme left are loud cunts, undoubtedly, but there's no equivalency between them when it comes to actual violence; much less outright loss of life.
The guy driving the car was a dick but he inadvertently slammed into an obese woman who had a heart attack. Heart attack was the cause of death. A healthy person could have survived... it doesn't change the severity of it but it's hardly attributable to right wing terrorism. It wasn't targeted. Anyway that entire event was ridiculous however there is a lot more footage of left wing violence from what I can tell.
No doubt right wing assholes did and do shit, f em, but the media exaggeration of trump supporters as dangerous when the left has dealt significantly more political violence as I explained is what concerns me. People don't realize it is the media and both parties that are the enemy to regular people. Trump is what he is but his kind of populism is not evil like it's made out to be. This is what it looks like to have a president not completely controlled by the political parties and media elites. I'm not necessarily a huge fan of him either but damn, I just want consistency. BUT right now it suits many people's needs because censorship and partisan politics are easier than letting the best ideas win in the marketplace of comments.
media exaggeration of trump supporters is dangerous
the left has dealt significantly more political violence a
It's interesting how you can grasp the true and factual truth of the former, and still succumb to the BS of the latter. The "murderous lefties are a comin' for you!" is as much of an illusionary scaremongering as "Everyone on the right is a white supremacist nazi spree-killer in waiting!". It's a cynical internet effort to create not only an equivalency, but a weighted imbalance against "the enemy".
Fuck the media: but that doesn't justify employing their same tricks and lies the other way, especially when the detestable (and NON-REPRESENTATIVE) minority on the right is factually by far more of a real problem.
​
[Also, PS: The guy in the car was premeditated. He drove circles to position himself and had spoken about violence against the protesters.
Her heart attack due to the injuries she accrued is no more an "extenuating circumstance" than, say, an elderly person dying "to what a healthy person could have survived" after being stabbed while on anticoagulant heart-medication: or simply beaten with their more brittle physiques. It's an absurd and frightening notion to humor.]
In the context of global politics, I am not sure that the banning of a niche forum for hate speach and harassment on a internet message board constitutes "something".
Well he says something big is going to happen constantly, in the most vague statements ever. After enough PBR your mind can twist any situation to fit his "predictions".
I've always thought of he/she/them/whatever as basically the pro-Trump version of a horoscope... say a ton of super vague stuff that you can read anything you want into.
I guess when you want to see something you can. It's been a pretty consistent theme there from Q on down that we're all Americans, that this isn't even a right / left divide issue much less one of race. I've seen plenty of the right / left divide in the community, there were a large number of people on the right that couldn't quite let go of the dislike for liberals and the democrats but there was never a consistent theme of racism.
I've only stopped in there on occasion. If anything they where celebrating the fact that races other than white where coming on board. That is hardly the thinking of racist.
I think my favorite Q conspiracy theory is that it's a psyop meant to pacify supporters if Donald gets indicted since it's all part of the plan or w/e.
I like to imagine the world 20 years from now. All the details of the Russian collusion are public. The Clintons both died of natural causes, first Bill, than Hillary, surrounded by friends loved ones. They were buried in state, mourned by dignitaries who traveled from the four corners of the globe. As was Michelle Obama, taken too soon, in a plane crash on her way to deliver supplies to survivors of an earthquake. Barack was devastated, but gradually was able to resume his life of service and good deeds, a respected elder statesman, always inspiring.
A disgraced Trump died of natural causes, his legacy a shambles, his abbreviated Presidency serving as a warning for future generations.
The eldest Trump children have served their sentences and live quietly, their reputations ruined. While there was no Trump fortune left after the legal bills for Melania to inherit, she makes a nice living on the talk show circuit; her ghost-written memoirs sold well. Several years after Michelle's death, she reconnected with Obama, and as his large hand enveloped hers in greeting, something sparked. They are seeing each other. Tiffany and Barron are doing well, thriving in fact, as are the Trump grandchildren.
Our nation has healed, for the most part. But still on obscure corners of the Internet live the aging Q crew, still waiting for vengeance on Obama and Clinton, still waiting for vindication for Trump. Still forlorn; still posting to "trust the plan."
aison d'être
Reason for being. The claimed reason for the existence of something or someone; the sole or ultimate purpose of something or someone.
Yes, I did a tad...The reason was to wake people up to what's going on behind the scenes and gave people the ability to make "predictions" on when the majority would wake up. Q made statements about future events that became true. And if he's a "larp", those would be considered predictions.
MSM has been used as well I believe, by redpills / breadcrumbs hidden in their (mostly anti-Q) articles which actually help to lessen the psychological blow when the 'normies' get confronted with truth eventually.
Q made a post about McCain on 8chan exactly one month before McCain's death. Therefore Q knew when McCain was going to die.
Unfortunately because this is such a random and spurious correlation, we need additional narrative such as:
Q knew when McCain was going to die because he is telling us something about McCain is going on behind the scenes and this has been planned to the exact minute for a month.
All this shows is Q made a post about McCain exactly one month before he died. The guy has 2000 posts. Each of those posts has data (time posted, random haikus in text, random picture) like this one and the best they can come up with is the alleged knowledge of McCain's death time. The knowledge is alleged because he never actually calls the death time, it's a post-hoc addition by his fans who have started with a conclusion and are fitting the evidence to it.
This is like that jenny saga a few years ago on reddit, people love the idea of being told a riveting story in real time. Also Q followers really get off on the fact that he talks in haikus because it makes him sound smart.
Q posts something DIRECTLY about McCain one month to the hour and minute of the death of the same guy. His post says he's returning to the headlines, oh boy did he ever.
Could this be a coincidence? of course it could. But what are the odds? Q also said "Every Dog has his Day" and he died one day before Dog Day. Also, McCain died exactly 17 days before 9/11... 17... 17th letter is Q
And which Q drop was that? And would that McCain's death by natural causes, McCain's execution, McCain's suicide, or McCain's faked death because he's been sentenced to Gitmo by a secret military tribunal? Since Qultists can't seem to settle on his actual fate.
He didn't predict death. He predicted McCain would be back in the headlines, a terribly vague prediction which has been a pretty safe bet for years now, as McCain is a prominent politician. He also used the nickname NoName, a moniker he reserves for McCain, but should McCain be out of the news and someone else convenient to the narrative in, it would be easy to retrofit the prediction to be about that someone else.
Also, that claim--down to the hour and minute--hinges on McCain's place of death being two hours before EST. However, that image you link up to is wrong: McCain's place of death--his home in Cornville, AZ--is three hours before EST.
I think you might be confused because of Daylight Savings Time. In Arizona, only the Navajo Nation observes DST, and Cornville is not there, geographically.
So, if I check what time it is in Cornville right now, as I am writing this, it's 5:24 p.m. In EST, it's 8:24 p.m.
Wait. The actual time we use is not what matters? But the artificial division of time that we have invented for our own convenience, the month, does? 31 days has some significance here which would not be true if the drop had dropped on February 25? How do you decide?
And would you like to address any of my other points? Particularly the one that's about how the drop doesn't actually predict his death?
Hey man you can call it coincidence all day long. Q works that way. The strength of his proof is that this is just one of MANY coincidences, with many situations. If you don't think predicting his exact time of death isn't Spooky enough for you then that's up to you. Sure he could be in the headlines for any reason, being a prominent politician and all, except he was the headlines for a week exactly from that time on. That's phenomenal to me.
How'd he know?
Q theory is that he's a massive traitor. He did not go on his own terms. But Q also pissed off the researchers because he said for the stability of the Republic somethings must remain buried. So what really happened to McCain? Did he simply pass away? Not sure. Maybe one day we'll know more.
If you don't think predicting his exact time of death isn't Spooky enough for you then that's up to you.
I'd be impressed if he'd predicted his exact time of death. If Q had said that John McCain would die at 4:28 Arizona MST on August 25, that I'd be all aboard the Q-train, Q-Q for QQPuffs. That would shock my skeptic sensibilities.
But Q didn't. Instead, Q predicted that No-Name would be returning to headlines. A safe bet when the man was said to be dying, and a safe bet when the John McCain National Defense Authorization Act was up for a vote in the House the day after the Q drop dropped.Were any Q believers posting that this must be what Q predicted?
Remember the flood of headlines on August 13 and 14 when Trump signed the bill into law? Were any Q believers posting that this must be what Q predicted?
It's the oldest fortune teller's trick in the book. Be vague enough that your prediction can be matched to any one of multiple possible outcomes.
The strength of his proof is that this is just one of MANY coincidences, with many situations.
Well, then, give me another one, something Q predicted that came to pass, and something that's neither predictable enough (through common sense) nor vague enough to be explained away.
Your conflating theories from Q Researchers to what Q actually drops.
If Q accurately predicted McCain's death (and see my other reply for why I don't believe this is true), we are left with two possibilities.
Q is a psychic, or a seer, or a prophet, and he gets this information by supernatural means.
McCain's death was planned, down to the date and minute (but not the hour, see my other post for why), for some reason. And scheduled a month out from the drop, for some reason. And hinted at to the general public, for some reason.
None of that makes any sense at all. Whether in the context that McCain was executed, or allowed/forced to commit suicide, or allowed/forced to fake his death. What possible reason could there be for a month's time between the drop and the event?
And that brings me to my next point: Q Researchers (I like the nickname Qultists myself) all have different ideas of what really happened. What possible good is a Q drop that is so vague that nobody can decide what exactly happened? Why is Q sowing so much discord among his followers?
I'm not familiar with how 4chan works, so I have a stupid question for you. Isn't everything on 4chan anonymous in away that it would be impossible to tell if the same person is making the qanon posts? For example, couldn't anyone post there claiming to be that person without there being a way to tell? I honestly have no idea, so asking for y education.
Sure, and again I might be way off here, but here goes. I understand that Q is a supposed to be a single person that posts what many to be inside knowledge of govt and foreign activity, including dissent, major upcoming events, etc. What I don't get is how people know it is a single person making these posts, rather than several claiming to be the same person. The reason I say that is that I thought the way that 4chan works (I might be wrong on this) is there are no user accounts and it's all anonymous. That makes me think person A could make a post claiming they are Q and the next day, person B could do the same.
'Q' started at the end of October 2017, there is a lot to study as to how it developed, and how 'Q' began using tripcodes (an ID, or a username of a sort), as well. Besides, it's on 8ch now, also using IDs.
The trip codes also change every once in awhile but always link up to some interesting reading when inserted into google books you get titles like 1945, behold a pale horse,
here is the newest tripcode put into google search engine
https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=mG7VJxZNCI
Unironically, Q's last post (2163) is called: It's Hammer Time
So what? That could cave any number of meanings.
The Q people should probably read about Barnum/Forer Statements; they work very well, unfortunately most people have some strong desire to believe that vague statements are the answer to their problems. Q uses the same techniques that any astrologer, fortune teller, or charlatans like John Edwards use. Most of the followers probably just aren't aware of how effective these techniques are, or maybe they are just stubborn, who knows ... there are probably a lot of reasons.
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
Seeing aa you are relatively new, matter of fact for fun, go post something pro Republican in a comment section. Please report back to us, the size of your asshole after its done being reamed.
/r/politics commenters are center-left neoliberals who believe in cookie-cutter Democrat policies. They worship capitalist institutions and despise the far left wing of their own party. If you think it's political extremism, I don't know what to tell you.
Yes, Wasn't it just yesterday or the day before that they cracked 70000? T_D is too big to ban, but they shut this one down before it got too big. Interesting choice for a "LOL Conspiracy" sub.
It’s crazy to me, my friend showed me that sub last month and after reading through quite a bit of it and then seeing it get banned...just goes to show they got something to hide. If it was all completely baseless and fake, no one would bother trying to get rid of it.
If it was all completely baseless and fake, no one would bother trying to get rid of it.
That's ridiculous logic. Say a man is standing on a street corner shouting how the police are corrupt reptilian aliens, everyone would just consider him a crazy person. If he then starts throwing bricks around and gets arrest, the police aren't trying to "hide the truth", they're just arresting a schizophrenic idiot for breaking the law.
True, you should never trust them blindly. But, considering I've seen the sub posted the things they got banned for multiple times, I'm inclined to believe the admins.
Without proof (screenshots) your argument is worthless.
I've seen plenty of comments in r/politics that were bad enough to shut down all of reddit but it never happens. Why is that? There are random comments in every sub that break the rules, but they don't ban the whole sub. What possible motivation would the admins have for banning certain subs and not others?
The daily calls for opponents to be executed is why it was removed. Q cockroaches will find another place to congregate and spread their mental illness.
They weren't calling for anyone to be executed. Lol.
It's perfectly reasonable for a forum to work in collaboration sorting through lots of research, find common patterns where their actions through history were dubious and require investigation with the potential to face justice for possible crimes against the state and its people.
I agree many of the users posted on a regular obsessive basis to the point where it really did feel like a game that never ended. If they wanted to be taken more seriously, they needed to post with more restraint and focus on actual provable evidence, not just tagging multiple hearsays and headlines to support their thinking.
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
Nobody's scared except that one of you lunatics is going to shotgun a mailman in a paranoid frenzy.
Y'all got banned for doxxing and threatening, and people are glad to see you go because your discussions are toxic to healthy American society. Disagreeing with people's policy stances and documented misbehavior are fine, falsely labeling them as Satanic pedophile cannibals is not helping anyone and helps radicalize the mentally ill into panic mode where they may do something violent like the dude who fired a rifle inside Comet Pizza.
Sub wasn't but I saw plenty of these wanna be subtle comments talking about their resistance, might and how Patriots stand up to fight for their rights and what they believe in.
There's literally no comment in that link that says anything to that effect.
Furthermore, the crimes being spoken of are Treason against the United States of America. This is punishable by death (execution.) This is what the sub was talking about. There have been absolutely no calls to violence since its inception.
But keep on painting the ever-changing narrative. It's not as if those efforts are transparent or anything.
PUBLICLY. It''s WAY PAST TIME for the millions of morons to wake up to the murders that they've helped facilitate. I'm only willing to let the accessories off the hook if they finally repudiate the leftards vociferously and violently.
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
PUBLICLY. It''s WAY PAST TIME for the millions of morons to wake up to the murders that they've helped facilitate. I'm only willing to let the accessories off the hook if they finally repudiate the leftards vociferously and violently.
I'll read it later. I have a hard time letting a few comments put a stain on any of these communities alone. If I did that, then I'd consider this sub anti-semitic, racist and kind of dumb.
I don't though because I understand that there are bad examples within every single community, Top Minds included. That and this subject matter is all very interesting.
The fact of the matter is that this movement has never been about violence. The conditions of our society coupled with the atrocities committed against humanity leave some feeling violent; that doesn't make the entirety of the community bad.
The fact of the matter is that this movement has never been about violence.
Except it was. The GA was always about violence. Thinly veiled usually but sometimes blunt. They want to see the people they view as evil hang. They believe Hillary Clinton and Obama are treasonous child raping baby eating satan worshippers. This assertion is enigmatic of the entire "movement" and telling to how they view the world.
The Great Awakening lives in and can only exist in an ideology with a violent world view.
Fuck that sub. That being said, by your logic then Reddit should ban any and all subs completely wherein a poster called for violence or insinuated something violent? It happens on every sub, political or otherwise.
I won’t miss that GA Q bullshit for a second, just not a fan of blanket rules when it comes to closing an entire sub.
Like I know people shit on TMOR and other anti-conspiracy subreddits, but all you need to do is search on them and find mountains of comments dog whistling or straight up calling for violence. And they have a bot to archive all their posts.
So that is two Q related subs banned within a few minutes.
Well, eff you reddit but thanks for confirming that Q is a very real threat to some powerful sewer dwellers. Obviously it is way more than just some LARP. I've had my doubts about it, not anymore.
It is also time to give up on the ShareBlue controlled joke called reddit, I guess.
dissenting opinions? These people worship the president who literally attacks and threatens the press for negative stories about him, even when they are 100% objectively and factually true and void of any "opinion."
If you're worried about censorship, it's a "movement" like Qanon and support of a President who hates the constitution that should concern you more than anything.
Why can't I be concerned about both? I don't support Trump, but I also don't support shutting down his supporters either. I'm concerned about everything right now quite frankly.
That's kind of how reddit always worked. We downvote opinions we don't agree with and upvote those that we do agree with. If you want dissenting opinions, there's other websites/forums for that. But reddit has a streamlined format that is easy to use, so everyone prefers coming here.
Also, people have been saying exactly what you are saying now since reddit banned /r/FatPeopleHate.
You can literally just make your own website. Voat exists (and its full of trash). Breitbart exists. The Blaze exists. It's not like its now illegal to have right wing opinions. I think Reddit went a little overboard, but this whole "here comes the 1984 style crackdown on free speech" is so overblown. It's just Reddit
So there's no big conspiracy going on? The government/powers that be/elites are content with the amount of power they have? Then what are we even doing here in conspiracy?
I mean if it were just reddit I'd agree with you. But look what they're doing to Alex Jones? I think AJ is a plant and a gatekeeper so what they're doing is orchestrated, but it's starting.
No. That's the least of it. The censorship of subreddits is only a part of it, the censorship of Alex Jones is another part, but this may be one of the bigger parts:
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
Good luck with that. Hate sites have been around since the Internet began; they were fringe back in the wildest of internet days, and they're about to go back to that fringe again.
They had about a decade where social media companies were too dumb to do anything about them. That time is over, and back into the dirty closet they go.
The T_D mods have been very careful to distance themselves from the GA. They pinned a thread not too long ago denouncing the whole thing as a leftist psyop. But then the GA said they were compromised.
lol just fantastic. It's a leftist psyop OR a deep state insider trying to throw the whoel government. Obviously, in no way, is it all a pile of bullshit to feed a crowd of people what they want to believe.
Yes, that's how banning works. The sub is completely inaccessible by everyone except the admins. Even comments made in the sub no longer appear in user's profiles.
There were plenty of T_D users that were following Q, and the T_D mods weren't too picky about people discussing Q posts, but when one of the mods went on a tear that was kinda the beginning of the end of the free flow of info between the two subs.
Not really. It’s all just work of passion. To know how happy all those image uploaders are!
We are so lucky to have generous image hosting site owners spending their own money to host our images. So much good in the world that we often take for granted.
As was conspiracy. This is real 1984 orweillen shit. Facebook just banned the #walkaway movement as well. This is going to back fire so hard. WTF are these leftist media companies thinking?
I also remember the sub shut down for 24 hours allegedly in protest of something... but ever since it came back up, all mention of Seth Rich was banned. This was around the time that Alpha Jalloh came up as a strong suspect based on his car theft rings.
Ever since then, anything related to the Seth Rich investigation was verboten.
I hear this every time there's a ban, yet it only seems to be the bizarre hateful subs that get banned. To be fair GA wasn't a specifically hateful sub like ones such as fatpeoplehate or coontown, but I think it was a place with very dangerous ideas that were always getting worse. Whether or not that deserves a ban, eh. But I can point you to plenty of longstanding popular subs that don't conform to the typical Reddit echo chamber.
Because there are a myriad of websites that do allow these conversations. The reality is you don't just want any platform, you want a popular platform.
You aren't entitled to a popular platform. Technically you're not even entitled a platform. Private companies and people are not obligated to listen to your opinion nor are they obligated to allow you to field your opinion to other people. Reddit has as much moral and legal reason to allow the greatawakening as you do to have me on your yard yelling about how Trump is a fascist. The essence of personal liberty is the ability to also say "no". The first amendment doesn't force private citizens to give other people a platform to speak on. In fact the court case involving the gay wedding cake proved this.
I, for example, accept that the ban hammer will(likely) fall heavily on this thread from the moderators on myself and others based on the perception that we're shills, or brigaders, or some other bullshit reason that's really to silence any differing opinion.
If reddit decides one day they disagree with my opinion and chooses to ban me, then by all means.
I'm fine if I get banned here. I've been banned from /r/conservative and /r/askthe_donald for bullshit reasons too. Plus I feel I should point out reddit didn't ban any of the users of GA. You're all clearly still here.
That was my second point. Reddit hasn't actually banned any of the users(tbf to my knowledge at least). You're all still perfectly able to voice your views here for example. Or why don't you go to The_Donald for example. Plenty of other places on reddit will tolerate you rn.
But yeah I'd be fine if reddit banned me totally as well.
Lol TUMOR. That's actually a new one, its clever. Did you think of it yourself, honestly curious.
Also while I am a TMOR user I also lurk here. Kinda the point of TMOR. I've taken the opportunity to comment because this occasion is hilarious and the GA has always fascinated me.
If it's so simple to do this to take down subs, why doesn't it happen all the time? Why aren't right wing subs taking down SRS? Why wasn't t_d attacked with this method?
What he is telling you is this is how they are getting sub-reddits banned.
this is there playbook r/againsthatesubreddits r/thebanout2018.
While this is happening posts are also being actively down-voted.
this is a warning to you and giving you all the ability to defend.
The only thing sweeter than watching them melt down over the Russian investigation is watching them melt down when their unsubstantiated, violent crackpot bullshit subs get banned.
I think it has less to do with the "left narrative" and more to do with reddits bottom line. Advertisers don't like controversial conspiracy subs. They like r/movies and r/aww and shit like that.
​
But then again r/watchpeopledie is still a thing so who knows.
Good news. Now that it's been shut down that community will out of necessity be forced to post outside of that subreddit. Look forward to it bleeding into your favorite subs.
People there was a bit crazy. Understandable considering that most people were 40+ years old but i don't quite understand why it was deleted... Well, i suppose reddit is dead now, is Voat a good alternative?
They killed a few interesting subreddits over the year but somehow places like w***peopledie are still alive. So moral is out of the equation about why those subreddits are being killed, then maybe money and outside influences?
I think reps are generally considered right wing and dems left wing, by most of the public. Meaning you cant go on r/politics and promote any republican ideas. I don’t know if any Hillary supporters would call themselves right wing
No, it's not. There was heavy moderation to remove posts that would leave the sub vulnerable to being banned but no moderation based on controlling a narrative.
It literally had a RULE in the sub that comments that "did not advance the cause" would be removed....what do you call that? Controlling the narrative.
That was a crazy place but as long as they weren’t advocating for violence then they should be allowed to circle jerk. I have to admit I dislike the heavy handed mods removing and banning concerned or dissenting voices. GA used to be more accommodating but recently they went full T_D and crushed any non Q loving comments.
Well they shouldn’t be shocked that a larger group banned them then. That’s the problem, free speech has to be honored by all parties. It’s pretty simple.
Its a small group of people who control social media and news media who happen to have a large group of group-thinking and asleep people who believe them. Sadly, generations of indoctrination as made it a larger group.
Indoctrination and brainwashing goes both directions. The irony of a calling a group thinking cultish community that suppresses speech as the bastion of “freedom and woke-ness” is lost on you then it is truly a sad moment in history.
Explain in a better way on the irony of it so I can respond in a better way.
The mods wanted to keep the subreddit they created on topic. Which was to talk about and investigate Q posts.
I think you miss the fact that people choose to subscribe to it, rather people don't have a choice when it comes to national and local media.
So, brainwashing doesn't go both ways in the way you try to make it sound. One side forces indoctrination on you and the other side is a choice people can make to see the other opinions.
I concede there are different types of brainwashing one forced the other through willful means. In both cases the narrative is so tightly controlled so that no counter facts or opinions get a voice and group think dominates.
I think the more insidious version exists in heavily controlled and isolated communities like GA. It’s very easy for these groups to be drawn into an deliberate propaganda conditioning scheme while being completely unaware of the process and ulterior motive of the controller.
Whoa honestly didn't expect this. There was zero calls for violence, a bunch of people who just want some truth about various criminal activity of high level government people. Reddit admins are corrupt to the core.
I think they shut it down because something big is about to come out, probably before the end of the week. What that could be, who knows.
This subreddit goes against Q bigly, which is odd for a conspiracy page. Especially when Q just drops bread crumbs and stresses for people to open their mind and think freely.
If this doesn't prove Q and the Great Awakening were right and on to the truth I don't know what does.
You mean our POTUS who the left thinks is a Conspiracy Theorist. He never believed the official 9/11 story, he never believed Obama was a Christian or born here. He also, without saying it knows NASA is full of shit. He gave them the money and said now go back to the moon and mars and then we find out all the previous moon footage, tech, etc was "lost". Space force is about competing against black budget, DS, NWO advanced technology.
Sad this page doesn't talk about the fact the world has been run by satanic pedophiles for hundreds of years. Who do these people hate? The same person you do.
The crazy homeless man in my neighborhood who would throw bricks at random passerby while ranting about "divine truths" was finally carted off by men in white coats the other day. I think it was because he was secretly God's chosen prophet and "the man" didn't want the divine word getting out. What that could be, who knows.
If this doesn't prove the crazy homeless man was right and on to the truth I don't know what does.
This thread is a great laugh, the door is that way if all you Q believers just can't stand to be on "Digg 2.0". Here is another great resource I think you should all check out as well.
I doubt it, this one is heavily controlled. Things leak into it despite that, I first became aware of Q last november through posts made here. Ever since any discussion of Q has been heavily down voted and attacked through comments. For a sub about conspiracies that's pretty odd if you think about it.
I lurked over on the great awakening every now and then to see what was being talked about, and although I didn’t spend a bunch of time on it, I never saw anything that would advocate banning it. I did however notice a change in posts and much more downvoting for the same content previously upvoted in the past after a recent mass influx of subscribers. And I was a little surprised the CONSPIRACY sub thinks so negatively of it. I don’t really feel any way about it, just an interesting observation lol
A forum advocating the roundup and execution of people for crimes like having weird art and making gross jokes on Twitter? It's shocking that it was pulled down for inciting violence. Shocking!
Ah yes we’d all love to be limited to boomer Christian art of portraits of Jesus and trump being mandatory and any other art being a death sentence. 😂😂😂
Chapter 47 of Title 10 , UCMJ Code, 10 U.SC. 801-946 and in order to prescribe amendments to the manual for court martial prescribed by executive order 12473
Type google "Trump Executive Order Military Tribunals" its the top link
"James Alefantis is a child rapist & child killer. They have murdered children. He is protected by W.H., CIA, DHS & media."
"Foxes guard the hen-house at Amber Alert, DHS & child-trafficking units in government. They rape, sodomize, murder & cannibalize children."
"Our entire government is filled with criminals, child rapists & child killers. I am speaking out now. I may not be long for this world."
The only thing I found about Rudy covering up pedophiles was when the catholic priest who married him and his wife was accused and he said he didn't believe it. Mostly due to being friends with him. Sometimes in life your friends aren't who you think they are.
reminds me of Joe Paterno and Sandusky.
Read his tweets in the link and tell me if you think he's trying to cover up satanic pedophiles
In the Fort Bragg case, “allegations of ritual abuse erupted ... in 1985 when several children at the Jubilation Day Care Center said they were sexually abused by a number of people at the day care center and at several locations away from the center, including at least two churches.”Aquino was identified as having been at one of those churches.
The Mercury News also reported that there was clear evidence of satanic cult activity on the grounds of the Presidio base, including an abundance of satanic graffiti, a satanic altar, and numerous artifacts of satanic rituals. A former MP at the base is quoted as saying: “We were sitting there, we've got a cult on the Presidio of San Francisco and nobody cares about it ... We were told by the provost marshal to just forget about it.”
As disturbing as the Presidio case was, it was just one of many ritual abuse cases directly tied to one or more branches of the United States armed forces. As the Mercury News reported: “By November, 1987 the Army had received allegations of child abuse at 15 of its day care centers and several elementary schools. There were also at least two cases in Air Force day care centers,” and another in a center run by the U.S. Navy.
In addition, “a special team of experts was sent to Panama [in June of 1988] to help determine if as many as 10 children at a Department of Defense elementary school had been molested and possibly infected with AIDS.” Yet another case emerged in a U.S.-run facility in West Germany.
These cases erupted at some of the most esteemed military bases in the country, including Fort Dix, Fort Leavenworth, Fort Jackson, and West Point. Many of those making the accusations were career military officers who had devoted their lives to unquestioned allegiance to the U.S. armed forces. Many would resign their posts in outraged protest.
The Times Herald Record reported in June of 1991: “The incidents [at the West Point Child Development Center] unfolded against a backdrop of satanic acts, animal sacrifices and cult-like behavior among the abusers, whose activities extended beyond the U.S. Military Academy borders to Orange County and a military base in San Francisco, parents charged.”
The case first broke in July of 1984, when a three-year-old girl found herself in the emergency room of the West Point Hospital with a lacerated vagina. She told the examining physician that a teacher at the day care center had hurt her. The next month, the parents of another child leveled accusations of abuse at the center.
As the Mercury News reported: “By the end of the year, 50 children had been interviewed by investigators. Children at West Point told stories that would become horrifyingly familiar. They said they had been ritually abused. They said they had had excrement smeared on their bodies and been forced to eat feces and drink urine. They said they were taken away from the day care center and photographed.”
Despite abundant medical and psychological evidence, and literally dozens of child witnesses, and despite “950 interviews by 60 FBI agents assigned to the investigation, an investigation led by former U.S. Attorney Rudolph Giuliani produced no federal grand jury indictments,” according to the Herald Record.
The Herald also noted that: “In 1987, Giuliani said his detailed investigation showed only one or two children were abused.” This was, it should be noted, a bare-faced lie, as the Herald report divulged: “a still-secret, independent report -- produced by one of the nation's top experts on child sexual abuse -- confirms the children's accusations of abuse.”
This was not the first time that the prestigious academy had shown an appalling willingness to overlook extreme levels of abuse directed at children by army personnel. A year before the abuse case broke, a 22-month-old child was murdered by an Army staff sergeant. The Mercury Newsreported that: “After a court martial hearing, the sergeant was given an 18 month suspended sentence and dishonorable discharge.”
In other words, he served no time and was essentially given a free ride for murdering a child. With help from Giuliani, the FBI, the U.S. Army, and the grand jury, the abusers of countless children at the day care center (which was, appropriately enough, building number 666 on the academy grounds) were likewise given a free ride.
Here comes your easy rationalization. "Hillary made Rudy cover it up before she had any power .... Donald knows that Hillary controls the Pentagon pedophile ring before the 1990s .... the Pentagon was terrified of Hillary .... the Clinton Foundation's $300 million budget DWARFS the Pentagon's tiny $Trillions ...."
In the Fort Bragg case, “allegations of ritual abuse erupted ... in 1985 when several children at the Jubilation Day Care Center said they were sexually abused by a number of people at the day care center and at several locations away from the center, including at least two churches.”Aquino was identified as having been at one of those churches.
The Mercury News also reported that there was clear evidence of satanic cult activity on the grounds of the Presidio base, including an abundance of satanic graffiti, a satanic altar, and numerous artifacts of satanic rituals. A former MP at the base is quoted as saying: “We were sitting there, we've got a cult on the Presidio of San Francisco and nobody cares about it ... We were told by the provost marshal to just forget about it.”
As disturbing as the Presidio case was, it was just one of many ritual abuse cases directly tied to one or more branches of the United States armed forces. As the Mercury News reported: “By November, 1987 the Army had received allegations of child abuse at 15 of its day care centers and several elementary schools. There were also at least two cases in Air Force day care centers,” and another in a center run by the U.S. Navy.
In addition, “a special team of experts was sent to Panama [in June of 1988] to help determine if as many as 10 children at a Department of Defense elementary school had been molested and possibly infected with AIDS.” Yet another case emerged in a U.S.-run facility in West Germany.
These cases erupted at some of the most esteemed military bases in the country, including Fort Dix, Fort Leavenworth, Fort Jackson, and West Point. Many of those making the accusations were career military officers who had devoted their lives to unquestioned allegiance to the U.S. armed forces. Many would resign their posts in outraged protest.
The Times Herald Record reported in June of 1991: “The incidents [at the West Point Child Development Center] unfolded against a backdrop of satanic acts, animal sacrifices and cult-like behavior among the abusers, whose activities extended beyond the U.S. Military Academy borders to Orange County and a military base in San Francisco, parents charged.”
The case first broke in July of 1984, when a three-year-old girl found herself in the emergency room of the West Point Hospital with a lacerated vagina. She told the examining physician that a teacher at the day care center had hurt her. The next month, the parents of another child leveled accusations of abuse at the center.
As the Mercury News reported: “By the end of the year, 50 children had been interviewed by investigators. Children at West Point told stories that would become horrifyingly familiar. They said they had been ritually abused. They said they had had excrement smeared on their bodies and been forced to eat feces and drink urine. They said they were taken away from the day care center and photographed.”
Despite abundant medical and psychological evidence, and literally dozens of child witnesses, and despite “950 interviews by 60 FBI agents assigned to the investigation, an investigation led by former U.S. Attorney Rudolph Giuliani produced no federal grand jury indictments,” according to the Herald Record.
The Herald also noted that: “In 1987, Giuliani said his detailed investigation showed only one or two children were abused.” This was, it should be noted, a bare-faced lie, as the Herald report divulged: “a still-secret, independent report -- produced by one of the nation's top experts on child sexual abuse -- confirms the children's accusations of abuse.”
This was not the first time that the prestigious academy had shown an appalling willingness to overlook extreme levels of abuse directed at children by army personnel. A year before the abuse case broke, a 22-month-old child was murdered by an Army staff sergeant. The Mercury News reported that: “After a court martial hearing, the sergeant was given an 18 month suspended sentence and dishonorable discharge.”
In other words, he served no time and was essentially given a free ride for murdering a child. With help from Giuliani, the FBI, the U.S. Army, and the grand jury, the abusers of countless children at the day care center (which was, appropriately enough, building number 666 on the academy grounds) were likewise given a free ride.
Here comes your easy rationalization. "Hillary made Rudy cover it up before she had any power .... Donald knows that Hillary controls the Pentagon pedophile ring before the 1990s .... the Pentagon was terrified of Hillary .... the Clinton Foundation's $300 million budget DWARFS the Pentagon's tiny $Trillions .... Rudy has changed, he flipped and he will spill all the beans about 9/11 but only after Hillary gets the guillotine!"
Or do you agree that Rudy being trusted for anything is a problem?
I don't agree with his decision there and thanks for the texts bc the link didn't work.
I wonder why he covered it up. But read my link and you can see he knows whats going on behind the curtain
I want to apologize for my flippant tone, because I believe you're sincere. Or even if you're Operation Earnest Voice, your comments represent someone who may be real.
But your refusal to acknowledge that Giuliani is dirty, that he "knows what's going on behind the curtain" because he is Deep State & blackmailed -- they don't make Rudy in charge of a nationwide pedophile ring investigation of the U.S. military unless he is fully compromised -- shows that elite pedophile blackmail will prevail.
You will feel good about getting the Clintons eliminated in a military coup, installing Pentagon government, sacrificing a Rothschild or two, and having military trials replace civilian courts. You'll change the Constitution and it will be a big celebration. And the Pentagon pedophile ring will be protected forever, unchallengable. All because of Q. Did you know that Q says that the Pentagon is "the only part of government not corrupt"?
Stickied posts stating that it was a non-violent movement.
Clearly stated that mods would remove calls to violence.
Clearly stated that calls to violence would likely be shill posts and dealt with accordingly.
Entire sub still shut down.
To all the Q community in here please understand that Reddit is pretty lefty and your posting here or anywhere else regarding Q will be met with trolling and flaming.
I found the post interesting and got you thinking on a lot of things. Even I thought some of it was way out there. Regardless, I don’t recall anyone on the subreddit calling for violence. There were several times where someone would post something derogatory and users would step up and tel them to remove the post because that’s not what they were about.
Yes there were posts about holding people accountable to potential crimes but I never once read anything that was even close to calls for violence.
I was on there all the time, going to miss the actual information and crowd source intel posted there, could care less about the dumb memes. Lots of good discussion on exec orders, SCOTUS cases, hidden gems in cspan videos, etc...
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
Gotcha. So you cannot provide any evidence and instead choose to be angry because you don't get it. Thank you for proving you are not qualified to comment on the matter. And nothing, "got erased"
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I mean, to be fair if more people could move there the content could shift from blatant racism to other subjects.
The thing about a truly open website is that there's gonna be stuff like racism, just something you have to deal with it.
It's like 4chan, a place I actually visit often, because I like it, even though there's racists, etc there but there's also a lot of others willing to just chill and discuss things. You just gotta ignore the shit you know.
I suppose, but it was voted to second place at the top, and the comments were fully on board with it, so if it's shilling at play, there's a ton of them there. That alone would make me question why I would consider that a good alternative.
Regardless, Occam's razor and all that - a simpler explanation is just that people there are either racist or just don't care which isn't much better
On purpose maybe. But more so back in its inception, voat was being targeted. Now there is a majority of huh, dark topics driving away most of the general public. A group only has to swarm a new site at the beginning and the community is set.
This is why I find ActivityPub a good Idea to front a harmless, innocent site for normies, but everything is interoperable and the nasty sites are still reachable.
Wow, unbelievable. If they had just banned GreatAwakening and cited "violent threats" or some bs, that would be one thing. But to ban every Q-related sub? Wow.
Because of all users in all 20 subs? This wasn't 1 but many yet we still have subs like Russianlago that shits out lies daily. Unbelievable censorship that will only make the Q movement stronger. Dumb move on Reddit.
Why ban only one sub so they flood the next one? I saw the posts on the_greatawakening, they would have kept on creating new subreddits and migrating to the other 19 subs.
Nah dude, each sub it TOTALLY DIFFERENT AND UNIQUE. Pay no attention to the fact that they repeatedly talked about just moving over to the other subs if they got banned.
I don't understand how people think the reddit admins would ever be dumb enough to fall for that.
Do you want me to show you subs that focus on hating white people and Christians? I can show you many subs of hate on both sides of the political spectrum. They banned all 20 subs not the subscribers. They silenced the movement.
Just link the subreddits. There is no reason not to link them. Do not make some allusion to their existence and leave it at that. Add something substantial to your post.
Can you point to violent threats on all 20 subs that were banned?
They banned pro-trump conspiracy theories that opposed the corporate media lies. They banned because the movement was convincing and picking up steam. Russianlago is a huge conspiracy sub focused on anti-trump theories. It's based on a lie without any factual evidence. This was a censorship effort since 1 side was banned.
There are people on the left and people on the right and hen there are crazy assholes on the far far left and crazy assholes on the far far right. It is this last group that just got banned. Don’t mistakenly think that regular conservatives have been banned, that’s not what happened.
Does it matter if they are crazy? If no crazy left wing nut subs get banned. That is censorship. All conservative subs are bad, racists, crazy and full of hate. Go subscribe to TD and see how easy it is to subscribe. You get instant bans. The fucking retarded fear of the right shows the strength of their ideology.
I've been instantly banned from politics. So has most who disagrees with mainstream.
There are a lot of subs. Banout to Russianlago to many very specific hate groups against the right that total above 30 at least. Not all are bad, they are propoganda subs but banout for example is focused on getting subs banned that support conservative views.
You might have been called a bot but there is no way you were instantly banned. You should probably delete your posts there if you want to pretend that you were banned.
Let’s do a test, I will create an account and post something equivalent to “I think Trump is a bad President” on the_donald and “I think Trump is a great President” on /r/politics. Which do you think will ban me first?
You are comparing apples to oranges. TD is a groupie sub not a default political sub and it is prevented from hitting r /all. If you have a sub called politics but all politics is anti Trump and lies about conservatives then it's a lie and should be changed. Meanwhile ultra left wing mods work to ban any pro Trump subs. This is censorship. Also people have alternative Id's on Reddit and go post something positive about Trump and show positive facts that dismiss the claims. You will see these posts daily on T_D.
yes, we agree on something. One is a forum of unintelligence and misinformation, or ‘groupie’ sub as you call it, and the other relies on actual news but with a bias towards reporting pro democracy news.
It seems like you are agreeing that The Donald censors much more heavily than politics and more heavily than Reddit admins.
It is not dumb it is the ONLY move they have... they know what is happening and what the Media refuses to discuss. Still all anti-Trump non-sense. It really is that simple.
It's ridiculous, they label the Q movement as a ridiculous larp conspiracy movement. Then they started to call the following a cult. I visited the sub and there was no violent threats or behavior. This essentially proves to the people that Q was truthful and a threat. If you shut down all conspiracy theories that go against your ideology yet preach conspiracies daily against your opponents ideology while promoting violence...that is a super dumb move.
Excuse me, but if you've browsed those subreddits, they are some of the nicest people. It was in their subreddit rules to not dox or incite violence. I browsed daily and never saw a SINGLE post or comment doing either.
Excuse me, but if you've browsed those subreddits, they are some of the nicest people. It was in their subreddit rules to not dox or incite violence. I browsed daily and never saw a SINGLE post or comment doing either.
Lol every fucking q supporter is trying to pretend the sub wasn't talking about civil war and seeing Clinton/Obama/Soros strung up.
And what about the other... 13 subreddits?
Because they were just migrating from one sub to another.
I did browse those subreddits, and I did see the posts where posters/Q-believers described the methods of torture and execution they would like to see used on politicians they disliked.
Plus the recent doxxing of one particular twitter user, and the threats sent to that person, which I am guessing was the catalyst that kicked off the banhammer.
There was also the disturbing fantasies, often quite detailed, spun about the torture the Q believers were sure was being inflicted on (mostly unnamed) children by specific persons. But that's a whole 'nother can of mental illness.
Mods don't ban brigadiers here and let disinfo and shill tactics to take over
This is probably the only reason why conspiracy is still around
Everything here is manufactured, including the hatred for Q and the people looking into Q. This place is as divided as it's always been, because it's a limited hangout and a honey pot.
Actually nothing happened with pizzagate. One guy let off a shot gun in one shop and that was pretty much it. We could use this argument to ban left wing subreddits because they lead to antifa violence
I don't think so - I participated many times and if someone did something stupid they were ejected. It had NOTHING to do with content violations etc. - they just pulled the trigger.
"These people are stupid" is a Q saying which, used in this context, likely is saying Reddit is stupid. Banning all these subs at once indicates the ban was political rather than in response to real issues. Sessions is going to lay the anti-trust hammer down on these big tech companies colluding as a cartel to manipulate the political landscape.
I'm on mobile so can't link it but that 50k indictments is a lie. First of all they are actually sealed court actions. Only a small percentage are indictments but q calls them that to make it sound worse. Secondly the 50k number is a totally tally of all the court actions filed and doesn't count all the ones that have already been unsealed. Again, another lie. Lastly, people claimed that 1000 court actions was average for a year but that is misleading. The 1000 was all court actions from 2006 that weren't unsealed until 2008. No one actually knows how many is normal but it's definitely way more than 1000.
Sooo yea, q lied about it to make it seem like something big was happening. I can link to all sources when I'm on my pc tomorrow if you want.
This read was sooooo hilarious, I honestly couldn't stop laughing ;-) All the best and who said anything about Q...not I. Judicial Watch, William Binny and other whistleblowers on the other hand have held detailed discussions on the topic. Thanks for the laugh though well worth the read :-)
Retooling CDA 230's another possible avenue. CDA 230 lets Reddit curate content like a publisher, due to the "good samaritan" provision, let Reddit's not liable for content. I'm not a lawyer, but perhaps there's some way to bake in protection for non-inciting political speech.
They claim victory when literally anything happens. They claim victory when things they invented happened. Q claimed he shut down FBI supercomputers or something and they believed it. Banning their subreddit doesn’t give them credence because they try to get credence from everything.
I never saw them claim victory with anything. Why are people making stuff up about the place? Sure some believed way out there stuff but there was never any violence or doxxing or threats.
Reddit straight up censored a larp. Why would you do that?
They banned the rest of the subs because they are spin-offs of the original GA and CBTS_Stream. That’s how reddit bans work. No spinoffs allowed. Stop being a paranoid loser and think objectively here.
Neither am I that is a derogatory term . One of my areas of study is history and the bible. just thought i would point out. what the person above was saying. It fit within the "context"
Q, if a US military intelligence PYSOP like I'd guess it is, is a resourced threat and something the deep state hasn't yet had to deal with. The deep state relies heavily on the crude mind control that monopoly of MSM and big social gives them. Their monopoly on egregore production and narrative creation has, thus far, allowed them to do whatever they like. If what Q's saying is real, things are bad for them. If what Q's saying isn't real, then one would wonder why the deep state's devoting resources to it given the deep state's crude mind control would normally be able to solve their problems.
Many of the users here believe Q is a disinformation campaign, infusing a partisan bias and consideration for Trump as against the deep state.
Great way to make you all think that you’re so dangerous to the elites they had to ban you. Now you’re goofy little charade is bigger than ever, you should be happy.
All those subs are splinter subs of GA and CBTS_Stream. Many of them shared mods. This is how reddit does bans. When a community is banned, they don’t get to just make another one and do the exact same shit.
Yes. It's because the banning bridage literally have a discord in which they plan organised bridading to those subs, they post hate speech / threats in those subs and then use it to justify the report / ban. It's really not rocket science guys...
YES EXACTLY - so pissed about this... they will have their day to answer for these types of things. The people who shut these down knows there were zero violations.
Reddit literally says when they ban one sub they ban all the variations of it as they want that kind of community gone completely. It's a domino affect not some conspiracy against mentally ill boomers
crazy people pretending they are god's chosen warriors fighting against the end times more like it. Delusions stemming from an unhappy and mediocre life
All of these subs banned simatnuiosly? That's straight up censorship and more evidence that Q is not a LARP. If violence or hatred was expressed that is worse then politics nees or world news...I want to see it. This is bullshit whether you like then or not. Reddit will lose in the end.
There was no calls for violence on there mods actively banned anyone that did very quickly, community was mostly sharp on self moderating due to all the censorship happening elsewhere.
This is straight unabashed censorship.
If this doesn't confirm it for people they are beyond help at this point.
It won't be long before this sub meets the same fate. Mark my words. Some of the thoughts being expressed that go against the official narratives will be considered hate speech or something akin, and the sub will be erased from existence.
The absolute biggest threat to the Cabal/DS is people thinking for themselves. They are clearly trying to figure out a way to spin whatever is about to be dropped and will do everything they can to prevent those who are awoken from spreading the truth.
You're not very good at conspiracies are you? If you censor a sub-reddit like that immediately people will figure out that the information contained is likely true, otherwise there'd be no reason for alarm. It's being shut down now as a last ditch effort to quarantine Q followers.
In dictardorships, people are imediately censored with the justificative that they are spreading lies about the government all the time, and they can't simple discover it's darkest secrets in an open internet forum without magically disapearing.
“Thinking for yourself” was the opposite of that sub. Every “Patriot” sounded the same, spouting inane catch phrases: “Boom!” “These people are sick!” “I’ve got my popcorn ready!”
If something “big” is to be “dropped,” then go ahead and drop it. Quit yammering on in coded language and lame memes for week after week, month after month. If Q knows everything, then what is the point of “researchers” tracking “crumbs,” anyway? The whole premise is flawed.
c ..an you dig it?
e ..dit comments?
d ..on't say a word
d ..on't oppose censorship
i ..shouldn't be sharing
t ..this...but then again, everyone knows, right?
this thread
https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/catalog.html📷
Main points of interest only.
It will serve as the main hub of all communications once all other sites 'tracking' collapse [8ch only].
What part of another wave of attacks coming [yesterday] wasn't understood?
This is not a game.
Q
apparently kids still play that game. =) anyways. the site never incited violence. if you think it did, oh well. youre drinking the wrong kool aid. not one drop incited anything about violence or to cause harm to another. More about protect yourself, heads up, incoming bullshit.
Oh no now where will insane people discuss their desire to see all their ideological opponents mass imprisoned or murdered by the state because of satanic pedophile fanfiction.
Except you're entirely wrong. It was written specifically in the rules there is no violence or doxxing. Qproofs was banned as well and there is only 1 person that posts there. This was a targeted hit, Q is real and they are panicking.
Ain't no bsing. Lol I can tell you're mad. Nah it was written in the rules and the mods appropriately removed violating material. Tmor always gets off citing they tell people not to, and they openly brigade subs. Mods at greatawakening followed all the rules. They were targeted.
Further proof could be deduced from the banning of Qproofs, a sub with only 2 allowed posters.
What can you do to prove to me that you believe Q is real? I seriously don't trust that you're not trolling right now, and before I engage you at all I'd like to be sure of who I'm speaking with.
You are talking to a real person. While I myself am critical of the validity of all this myself, the stuff Q anon talks about us dead on. They were the only people on reddit still talking pizzagate so a lot of people jumped on. So Idk if Q is real but there was that one, the fact he called going mainstream, (the fact it is mainstream, all for a larp?), and the time someone on the chans asked trump to say tippy top and he did, and when someone asked them to tweet at the same time as trump and he did. Anyone got my more?
My question was "What can you do to prove to me that you believe Q is real?". The answer I got was a video that was written, apparently, by a 12 year old with a loose grasp on what the shift key is for. There is nothing, whatsoever, in that video that says anything at all about anything. You could literally read your horoscope every day and find it to be as or more accurate.
Which is why I'm asking you to show me you're not just a troll. How can I see that, which is absolute BS, and actually believe that you think it has any amount of truth to it? Give me something outside of youtube videos and rants about deep state shenanigans that can be dismissed just as easily. How can I tell that you're telling the truth. Not Q. You.
You didn't understand then I don't know how to help you. Video is usually the best medium. He literally predicted the nationality of a terrorist and said he would fail and did. There is reason enough to look into it. I've given you proof you choose not to see it.
Give me something outside of youtube videos and rants about deep state shenanigans that can be dismissed just as easily. How can I tell that you're telling the truth. Not Q. You.
Wait WTF are you talking about? What do you want a dick pic or something weirdo? I'm not gonna dox myself if that's what you're asking. What are you even asking? You sound like a man on a ledge.
Some evidence that you personally believe this stuff. My problem isn't with the content, it's with whether you're just doing a heckin troll or if this somehow resonates with you as something truthful. If it does, what about it feels most 'truthful' - what can you identify with or what doubts did you/do you have that were sated by some piece of evidence, and what was that evidence?
I believe the people, the citizens in the Q movement. They were only ones still discussing pizzagate with actual analytical questioning. A fair amount of cheerleading for sure as well. Like the reason I followed GA was cuz of the community not as much Q.
No dude clearly I'm there for the balls, ducks, and jizz.
The reason I'm treating you like this is cuz we've literally been talking for a day and you have only been annoying and pestering. I don't need to fucking splay myself and prove to you who I am.
You haven't answered any questions. These should be straight forward, simple things to give answers to. What's preventing us from just talking about it? I'm not trying to ridicule you or change your mind, or make you look or feel stupid.
I seriously don't trust that you're not trolling right now, and before I engage you at all I'd like to be sure of who I'm speaking with.
You chose to finish where you started. Please stop replying. You wanted reasonable doubt on how its possible. Showed you the video. You didn't care for it. That's on you. I gave you what you were looking for it was just too good for you I guess?
No, I'm not. You are the one drawing dicks and stuff. I've asked clear questions and you haven't answered any of them legitimately. I haven't changed my position or intent or tone. You've gone for reasonable response to insulting me to drawing dicks, to telling me I'm bothering you, to this. Despite all that, you haven't actually responded to what I've said.
But seriously, there are multiple types of brigaders, but the most sizable lot are disinfo agents who work for private contractors. Sub was taken over summer of 2016. It went from liberal to very conservative almost overnight. The power of shilling is extraordinarily powerful.
After months of disagreeing users came in from the pizza gate nonsense. It didn't change overnight, but the mods have been dedicated in keeping the subs direction against liberals/Democrats.
The only submission in the history of this sub to be tagged unverified is one about Trump. The submission history to this sub from half the mod team is very anti Democratic party. Removed and "contest" mode posts are consistently used to stifle discussion against those same topics
So "Sub was taken over summer of 2016. It went from liberal to very conservative almost overnight. The power of shilling is extraordinarily powerful." is supported to a degree. Specifically the degree that people were biased in their control of the subreddit, shills or otherwise. There is legitimate basis for a viewpoint to claim victimization for this biased moderation.
Notice how you're not banned or de platformed? Notice how several Russiagate pieces get posted and discussed here every day?
I'm not no, but i didn't claim that the entire viewpoint/opinion/political party was being entirely 100% censored or literally anything close to it. I provided evidence to support the aforementioned point that the subreddit has been pushing a specific agenda. And using those moderation tactics, discussions were deplatformed (or at the very least misplatformed since contest mode doesn't allow for the same kind of platforming for discussion as default commenting).
Notice how several Russiagate pieces get posted and discussed here every day?
Yes, in support of my, "After months of disagreeing users came in..." I literally agree with you here.
Give me a fucking break with the persecution complex bullshit.
I don't have a complex, i don't think I'm being persecuted and if I was its /r/conspiracy, big fucking deal if I were to be banned or deplatformed from this place, I come in every once in a while to counterjerk. But if you can't tell that mods are pushing an agenda by using moderation powers on a specific side, then I'm sorry you're wasting your time arguing with some random asshole over the internet you never intended to believe anyways.
I can't stand the vibe and tone of this sub and I only come around when there might be a good discussion of a relevant topic but I still have to wade through adolescent shit to find some good stuff.
We've got so many shills brigading this very thread. As if we are to believe that half of us don't think this ban was purely political. We see leftists spew far more violent rhetoric everyday in the random anti-Trump supporter subs that somehow get a million subs overnight.
In case this hits /r/all, here's a quick and dirty explanation of what /r/GreatAwakening was about. "Great Awakening" is essentially a conspiracy theory about an alleged government employee (calling themselves "Q" after the classification level) posting cryptic hints on 4chan/8chan and peoples' attempts to interpret them. "Q" was supposedly working to undermine and overthrow the "Deep State" actors that were hampering Trump. Naturally, people started analyzing shit Trump would say and try to use it to prove whatever latest shit "Q" had dropped. They routinely harassed people and made calls for violence as part of their usual MO.
That's the short version. The longer version includes how it is an outgrowth of Pizza Gate conspiracies and lots of other shit.
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
The q Patriots never ever called for any violence. However there were some professional imposters, shills and trolls who tried to compromise the movement and they did everything in their power to divide the followers.
But it goes much deeper.
The essence of the q movement - in case anyone wants to know - is peaceful research of publicly available information, connecting the dots and seeing the big picture. Q’s most drops are worded as questions that, when answered, form a deeper understanding of our reality.
I’d bet they say the same about you, but I wouldn’t know.
I’m just concerned that many subs were banned seemingly out of nowhere. It appears that they were on the conservative side, but that wouldn’t be the reason they were banned. That would just be wrong.
Ah yes, what a nice way to deflect. "Oh, someone did something bad? Wasn't us, was professional shills. I have no proof of that, but if you question it, you're a shill."
If some new users start making threats on a subreddit, should that subreddit be banned? Those threats were not promoted by mods or active subscribers. GA was clearly being targeted. The moment you posted anything over there, you’d receive 15 downvotes. To say this wasn’t planned either makes you stupid or evil. Or both. Probably both.
If you think that tactic is so easy to accomplish, why don't you try it against a sub you dislike and let us know if you succeed or not. I for one would be interested in the results of such an experiment.
The q Patriots never ever called for any violence. However there were some professional imposters, shills and trolls who tried to compromise the movement and they did everything in their power to divide the followers.
Q Never was a single person, but a team of people 7-ish military, 3ish non-military. Less than or equal to 10 people total.
They were accurate to say it was Q clearance. Q is the highest security clearance in the elected sector. Q=17th letter of alphabet. Level-17 clearance is, not coincidentally, also the President’s security clearance. Technically, Sessions has a higher clearance than the President...
Nobody who was truly a part of the Q subs or part of the ‘Great Awakening’ were violent.
The Great Awakening mantra is WWG1WGA, also known as Where We Go One, We Go All. This is a reference to the bell on JFK’s boat. It’s purely a peaceful group, and with every group there are fake users who make violent threats or bash the things and people around them.
Pizza Gate was only a small part of the things the Q community were and are actively researching. If the clergy arrests, high profile sexual arrests (and resignations!) are any indication, then Pizza Gate’s dismissal would be unwise.
Trust me when I tell you all—banning a single sub for violations is one thing, absolutely silencing any and every sub? Now that’s just...censorship and fear. The timing couldn’t be any more indicative either: the FISA warrant is about to be declassified and Rosenstein is about to get booted because of it.
Most still follow this page for occasional interesting posts. And when this post is about a subreddit "Qboomers" followed getting banned, you'll get us to talk about it.
So when the men in white coats drag the frothing crazy man away in a straitjacket, your first thought is that this validates the crazy man? Maybe it's time you should re-evaluate.
I see this reasoning all the time and it just seems contrarian. Because your opinion is the minority and people don't want to give it a platform, you must be right?
If I followed trump around calling him a pedo, the secret service would cart me off. Doesn't mean he's got something to hide and I'm on the right track. It's just disruptive, and when I start encouraging violence, potentially dangerous.
Maybe its a LARP, maybe its not. 99% of the shit on this sub is probably nonsense but there's no white coats dragging anyone away. But when one particular and relevant conspiracy takes off and they shut it down, its raised my eyebrows.
You can also check out YouTube vids from Praying Medic and In Pursuit of Truth. They both do a good job of explaining Q posts. I also go to Voat and 8 Chan. They cannot stop us from getting the message and spreading the truth, no matter how much they censor us.
I used to pop into that sub periodically just to lurk and observe. It was honestly getting a bit frightening, they were circlejerking each other into a progressively more Intense collective frenzy with each passing day. It was just a matter of time before somebody ended up taking the LARP into the real world and creating some damn tragedy. Censorship sucks in general, but there’s a real reason why shouting “fire” in a crowded theater is not protected free speech.
Your cult of batshit-crazy where any public figure not kissing Trump's boots was smeared as part of a massive secret Satanic pedophile ring got banned from a particular website, and you have the gall to compare it to 1984 and the USSR? Get the fuck over yourself.
For the uninitiated: Sort by controversial and look at the amount of brigaded comments there are. People claiming (rightfully) that thegreatawakening broke no more rules than anywhere else are downvoted to hell, while the snide replies are upvoted. Its ridiculous. Its blatant. Anyone watching should be able to clearly see whats going on. This thread is full of bad actors and the votes tell the whole story.
That's what astroturfing with ShareBlue will do. Oh right, I forgot that's just a right wing conspiracy even though there's verifiable proof of this fact.
Fox News did a story where they interviewed one of the original founders of the whole Q movement and apparently he said it was all a hoax. He stated that they were trolling and didn't mean for it to go this far and it has "become dangerous, divisive, and harmful". He also mentioned that he was no longer involved but other founders were still. I really don't mind either way besides that "Free Speech" in being infringed upon greatly in current times under the guise of word play, divisive-ness, and so-called "HATE". We're talking about reddit here. Every day people seriously don't know all the horrible bottom feeding garbage you can find on here and I certainly don't approve of all of it (OR WHAT IS SAID).. BUT... I GODDAMN WELL SUPPORT THEIR RIGHT TO SAY IT!!!
​
P.S. We, as Free Americans, need to DEMAND free speech online as a right or find a viable alternative to Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc etc etc...
I couldn't find the original interview I was thinking of. Here's a similar one. It's Microchip being interviewed and talking about him releasing the recent logs showing he's no longer involved. BUT. I want to say this also, I don't trust the MSM as far as I can throw them. So I can't give you 100% proof about if Q was real or not. I don't even want to start that discussion. I just wanted to inform. My real opinion and the take-away should be the part about DEMANDING our right to digital free speech.
Good. Those people were straight up crazy, and cult style hyper religious too. Can't imagine the mental gymnastics you gotta do to be all about Christianity and also think Donald Trump is an upstanding moral hero.
And by the way many many people in that sub were pretty new and new to the entire idea of conspiracy excetera I was redpilled in 83 I've been out in the wilderness so fucking long that it doesn't bother me one fucking bit
I do think it's beautiful that millions are on fire for the same thing that I'm on fire for
good luck
I'm with you brother. I don't even register an emotional reaction when the sleeping angry sheep come to bleat at us nor does it affect me when the shills pile on. The longer it goes on the more people start to notice that things are not as they seem. We cant force people to take the red pill, we just have to wait for others to get there themselves. The actions of the desperate to stop this process only serve to hasten it.
The are using the only tools they have left out of desperation. They are going 5o lose this one. Can you imagine in a community of 70k users how many others were reading it that didnt have accounts? Can you imagine how many of them will never see the media through the same eyes? This is a huge red pill moment.
Yep. I've been laughed at most of my life for knowing what's really going on. Anymore I just feel bad for the person. I didn't come to follow the herd this lifetime, I came to forge my own path.
I was using the phrase in context...
All that I dating have been warned NOT to trust me..and told about each other..
And yet they line up, schedule their nights weekly..
Women online in 2018 Are an odd bunch that's for sure.
As with CBTS and now GA, your actions alone speak volumes. If it was really nonsense and ineffective why the need to target, infiltrate and undermine? Eh, patience is a virtue no one involved in this gets to walk away including all involved. You know whats coming you can delay it, loop it or even try to slow it down but you know it's too late. All the obfuscation all the lies, trickery and deceit yet here we still are... heading towards the inevitable. You will answer for all you have done sooner or later. Just as CBTS has done and GA has done well prepared backed up regrouped and back on the attack. Enjoy it while it last, you know whats coming more than most. Tekel...and found lacking.
As a disclaimer, I don't believe in Q Anon and I think the people following it are mostly engaging in wish-fulfillment. But, those guys were bringing a lot of things to light that I might have otherwise missed, and they were always perfectly nice to me when I asked questions in good faith. This is bullshit.
I'd love to know what it was but the link opens twitter and closed immediately for me. Going straight to twitter does not reveal a response. Pulled from twitter already?
In a related note I saw all the links Q posted - they were ready for today. It certainly was a coordinated attack. Looking forward to the day when the light of truth shines on this whole sordid affair
Incoming tsunami of retired people leaving their houses for the first time in months, to get supplies. Invest in Depends and stay off the roads for awhile.
Okay... so since they're banning multiple subs. Isn't this a loss for reddit as a whole? People will eventually leave, and I feel like that's the case if they ban this sub. The way I see it, they're trying get rid of any real conversations. Intelligent conversations at that, since they're targeting this sub also. After that, who knows what will happen
Are they banning specific subreddits? Or just going out of their way to ban whatever? I'm just confused as to why it's happening in the first place. The ones I've seen banned so far were pretty odd ones to begin with, so I'm not surprised they're gone.
I suggest searching YouTube for PrayingMedics videos, they are going to be a much easier format to digest than the remaining social media platforms. Do it quick though, I would not be surprised if YouTube goes to war with Q followers next.
Larping and accepting whacky sounding political opinions is now an unacceptable and bannable offense (but only on one side)
Memes might be illegal in Europe soon.
Good times. They're trying to take over this sub too and I suspect if people don't completely bend over to the shareblue extremists theyll ban this sub also.
Ok for conversation sake, what if someone in the admin like miller or scavino were the ones behind it. All that would prove is a cynical manuipulation to the point of trying to form a cult for their own gain. The notions of secret house arrests, gitmo detentions and mueller actually working to uncover clinton pedo rings....its still false information. So even if Q is run by trump directly, how does that not make the plight of its followers all the more pathetic. It would just be direct manipulation by use of misinfornation.
The allure is that if you took the time to check out the drops, a lot of it is actually accurate and factual to events happening right now, specifically the FISA stuff.
Look, I know it's easy to look at the wacky posts there and paint everyone with a broad stroke. But the reality is, this is a grass roots movement that has attracted a lot of people from various backgrounds. Everyone has their own biases and agendas and a lot of people interject them into Q drops. And some of what Q says is just hard to believe because it's so out there (but not for this subreddit). However, there is enough there to look at the news and say 'yeah, I remember Q saying that a couple months ago.' And quite frankly, it's an awesome spy story and it's interaction takes you along for the ride like nothing else.
Well said. If anything it makes you dig into the news and see how certain events are related. We wouldn't want people thinking for themselves now would we?
Im just a tourist here but doesnt LARP sound kinda dangerous when anything can be interpreted as fact as long as it fits your viewpoint?
Like, im well aware that this is a human thing and everyone does it subconsciously but it seems like all the /pol/ spin offs are aware its probably false but dont seem to care. Seems kinda scary when people start indulging eachother in their terrorist murderplot fanfiction or whatever they believe in.
How about when the larp is straight from the mouth of the media and intelligenc agencies and causes a war killing millions of people? (WMDs in Iraq? Gulf of Tonkin)
I don't know how much Q corresponds to reality or fantasy, if any... But I'm happy people with alternative views exist and were looking in to stories from another angle. It's better to have competing stories than just one universal unquestioned crock of shit
Thats a fair point, everyone should be skeptical of the war machine and all information around it.
But fighting misinformation with misinformation isnt good either. Unlike msm they really never have to justify themselve in any way, and can say literally anything they want without any basis.
Also, there are many sources of news that are critical, my guess is the main difference is that they are kinda boring in comparison. Q anon is feeding into peoples undercover spy fantasy which is fine until you start calling real people "threats".
I was checking out TopMindsOfReddit and they are claiming anything Q related was banned because these people who were getting accused of being 'pizzagate' are getting death threats. I wonder if there is anything to this? I'm currently looking into it. (P.S. I know topmindsof reddit is an anti-conspiracy reddit. I check out their sources, arguments, and posts; even though I find them rude and immature.)
This is just one reason why the QAnon subs got banned.
On the 12th of August a user on 8Chan posted a vague and cryptic message linking a satirical twitter account to a "global network of baby eating demonic pedophiles". But this wasn't just any 8Chan user, radicalized reddit users consider this to be "drop" from "QAnon" a person they believe to a prophet.
This message exploded through the QAnon network on reddit, where the movement is primarily based. This 'message from Q' was by design an incendiary bomb that was to be widely disseminated to the “Q believers”. This directly lead to owner of the twitter account being targeted and receiving hundreds of threatening messages sent by Q followers.
If you think that QAnon has nothing to do with Reddit. Then you would be gravely mistaken. r/Greatawakening is of such importance to the “Q Movement” that they were directly referenced by “QAnon” in the most recent “drop”.
These subs are becoming more radicalized and more emboldened every day. They openly mark their harassment as “Q sent me”. This hysteria is escalating, and it won’t stop until someone is dead. QAnon is Pizzagate, and it is as every bit as hysterical, deranged and dangerous. The QAnon subreddits are extremist training grounds. They not only promote the radicalization of their users, but unapologetically incite them to commit violent acts. This incendiary bomb was heavily promoted on several subreddits.
The reddit QAnon platform on reddit resulted in the twitter user “S8n” receiving 200+ threats from enraged Q “cultists”. This harassment can be easily found on his twitter account.
We at the TMoR have confirmed that u/itss8n the owner of the @s8n twitter account that was targeted, and he personally reported the harassment to the moderators of the main QAnon subreddit r/GreatAwakening, but they refused to remove the offending post claiming there was "no evidence" of the user being harassed. Instead they deleted his posts begging them to remove their multiple stickied threads about him, even though he explicitly stated he was receiving threats. They then officially then encouraged further harassment, and also provided an article containing his personal details.
Let me repeat that: they shared his personal details – when they knew he was getting death threats from their own users.
u/itss8n : Leave me alone. - REMOVED BY THEIR MODS.
u/itss8n : “I got harassed all day yesterday being accused of being a fucking child sex trafficker... do you have any idea what that’s fucking like, to be accused of something so vile because of a 3 year old tweet about a fucking PIZZA. Do you realise how insane that sounds.” - REMOVED BY THEIR MODS.
incite : to move to action : stir up : spur on : urge on
Examples of incite in a Sentence
The news incited widespread fear and paranoia.
the rock band's failure to show up incited a riot, as the crowd had waited for hours
You don't have to explicitly direct people to action, in order to "incite" them. Implying that someone is being a satanic pedophile who murders children and part of an unholy opposition is a direct incitement to violence.
Did the "Q" Post incite users into send death threats. Demonstrably, yes it did.
Did those subs promote a message proven to incite their users into making violent threats. Demonstrably, yes it did.
Did those subs refuse to remove the offending threads after being informed that the user was received death threats, yes they are still promoting these threads.
This message stickied and promoted by the QAnon subs provably directly led to death threats and harassment. And yet none of these subs removed the offending posts.
We have contacted the mods of these subreddits, but with the indisputable proof, but prior to their banning, all of these posts were still publicly available. The only response we received was from the Mods of The_GreatAwakening who told me that caring about death threats made me “of no value to society”. And the mods of GreatAwakening muted me.
r/GreatAwakening
1859: Satan twitter account
Q:1859"This Twitter acct was referenced for a very specific reason. HOLDS many 'questionable' messages from people of power/influence. These accounts are run by BIG NAMES."
INTERESTING Satan twitter.com/s8n - various references
Results to investigation into subscribers claim of receiving "death threats" because of Qdrop #1859 Q!!mG7VJxZNCI
Satan Twitter account is run by a 24 year old. Q... what the hell? Pun intended.
These subs were also involved in the harassment:
r/the_GreatAwakening
Q Post 1859 - "Satan" Twitter account: I miss you son @realDonaldTrump Q: This Twitter acct was referenced for a very specific reason. HOLDS many 'questionable' messages from people of power/influence. These accounts are run by BIG NAMES.
Q1859 @s8n - some names
s8n instagram followers
r/DrainTheSwamp
Patriots! We have the enemy scared and scurrying to delete any incriminating tweets from bad actors. I urge you all to DIG. We need to know who our enemies are. Find the tweets and expose them! ThanQ
Q posted this Account asked who was in control of these people and it’s obvious it’s Satan~ ~ Pray People ~ if you see Satan you can’t deny God ~ and God loves you!!
Similar posts:
An open letter to the Reddit Admins: Why don't you take death threats seriously?
The Mods of r/GreatAwakening stickied a post calling for the targeted harassment of a twitter user. The result? Hundreds of threats sent directly to the user. When the individual directly reported the harassment to them, they claimed there was "no evidence”… Here is proof of 100+ threats.
Don’t let the r/The_Donald and r/conspiracy distance themselves from QAnon and Qult. They are complicit in the explosion of hysteria and stupidity. They believe pretty much the exact same conspiracies and everything they read on 4chan.
[Huge Effortpost] I've documented the harassment/doxxing campaign of /r/GreatAwakening users against the twitter user @S8n. I believe this is an intentional act of malice perpetuated by the mods there. I implore you guys to read and report this to the Admins.
EDIT: Updated the context of this comment.
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
How did these people not get that it was an ARG? Like anyone with a brain would be able to see that. You mean to tell me people actually took it seriously and believed it??
I see a bunch of comments like the following: Ill repost my response below:
Q-guys are advocating violence against people because of conspiracy theories
No they weren't. Talking about indictments "around the corner" or even military tribunals, however misguided it may be, is not a "call or incitement of violence. They were talking about political and legal processes they think will happen or would like to see happen. That isn't advocating anyone go murder or inflict criminal violence on anyone.
Never went there but this banout shit is sad as fuck. How pathetic can you be, actively trying to silence opinions you don't agree with on reddit?
To those 'power mods' or whatever, if you're not being paid by someone to do it, get a fucking life, sheesh. Like seriously, is your life that empty? I kinda feel sorry for you tbh. Go outside. Have a break from the internet.
I love that you left off an important part of the definition to fit your view.
Bigot: a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (such as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance.
See that last part? These subs being banned were bastions of hate speech. This isn't about being offended by different opinions, this is about decreasing the spread of hateful rhetoric. If these people want to be bigoted scum, their ability to spread it should be limited in every possible way.
I actually think you're spreading hateful rhetoric by calling people bigoted scum. I think you are actually a bigot, and I'm sure plenty would agree.
You know what I'll do though, rather than spend my time trying to shut down your speech or subreddits you frequent? Just ignore your insane ramblings. Because I'm not a fucking sad act.
Again, if you don't go to these subs, you won't see anything to get offended about and cry like a baby. So why do you go there in the first place?
Brand management. Target demographics. Digital gentrification.
I know this explanation is going to be dismissed because few here seems to think companies are motivated by profit and are just carrying out edicts from a shadow government, but sometimes a store owner is silencing the screaming outside their shop because it is bad for business.
Expect more censorship. As companies drive away the undesirable, other companies companies are going to step up efforts to not be overrun by the outcasts.
Expect even more censorship. The sites that are open are going to become so toxic that they get deplatformed.
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I hope people don't leave and instead stay and continue to be a thorn in the side of people who want to make all popular places on the internet one big echo chamber.
I won't be losing sleep about banning a subreddit whose members called for military tribunals for civilians, made wild predictions that never happened and would talk about events in an extremely bizzare way. It honestly sounded like a place populated by people with schizophrenia at times.
In the case of QAnon, it actually does when those who believe seem to believe that EVERYTHING is accurate as their 'proof'. In that case, if anything ISN'T, then the whole thing comes falling down.
I don't know one way or the other, but I think one possibility is that if QAnon is a psyop, wouldn't then banning everything in one fell swoop be part of legitimizing it as disinfo?
​
Q is interesting but I've def seen a lot of wrong from it. I have no clue what it is but I think either an AI or a psyop
Interesting thought, or it could be what it said it is, lots of very real connections, and it’s main point is to look at these things yourself, it’s worth digging into
Actually supporting our president and believing that there are things going o behind the scenes that the main stream media intentionally doesnt tell you about... common sense...
All I see from the MSM and now from Reddit are attempts to silence people based on what they think and what they are researching - not based on any calls for violence or harassment. This will backfire, because it's wrong.
Didn't Q say there won't be civil war? I think the whole point of running the Q psyop is to prepare the public, at least some of us for what is coming. Whoever is behind this knows that if they just indict and prosecute the DOJ and FBI leadership that'll it'll look like Trump has pulled off a coup. That would simply play into the belief system of those possessed by the Trump derangement syndrome. I mean, it still will regardless but at least there will be those of us who can try and talk down our friends off the proverbial ledges they'll be screaming from.
it will never cease to amaze me how many people are committed to the idea of hanging around on chatboards controlled by giant corporations and expect they won't have problems. It is not impossible to run your own forums and yet nobody bothers. hmm
There was an influx of new accounts that were making anti-semetic statements and using "hate speech", "harassment", and "calls for violence". I'm willing to wager that these accounts were nothing more than proxies of /r/TheBanout2018 used to initiate the ban.
It's pretty simple really.
The way the banning works:
Gather powermods
Determine which subs you want eradicated.
Find a bunch of (potentially fake) subs with alt-right content.
Infiltrate the subs and post content that can be deemed "hate speech, calls for violence, etc" while simultaneously using bots to mass flag posts.
The sub gets banned and the Banout rolls on to the next one.
During the process all subreddits associated with the bans are now viewed as "hateful" as are their users. The intent is to not only ban all these subs, but to also get the users banned from conversing on as many subs as possible.
What rules could they have possibly broken? They stayed confined to their sub entirely, never advocated for brigade government, and were very clear that they had no racist opinions (patriots don’t have a skin color ideas). I really wonder what the justification was.
Yes, Wasn't it just yesterday or the day before that they cracked 70000? T_D is too big to ban, but they shut this one down before it got too big. Interesting choice for a "LOL Conspiracy" sub.
As i said show the reasons for the ban, I am on there enough to know in general how the board is run and I did not see things that would result in a board level ban.
Is that supposed to help your case? A public website that can be edited by anyone to say literally anything? I guess laziness is the least of your problems. Carry on.
Hey man thank you for posting this, I’m sorry for sounding like an idiot here, but could you maybe enlighten me on what kind of stuff was discussed on GA. I haven’t ever seen it but I am very curious as to what is going down right now
It would be nice if there were some form of justice, instead of just fascism, even if it is "privately owned". These companies like to act all democratic...until something goes against their narrative.
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
i mean the guy got caught photoshopping a picture of airforce one to use as evidence that he is really in the president's inner circle, but yeah sure this shit show getting banned totally gives him tons of credibility.
That was my second point. Reddit hasn't actually banned any of the users(tbf to my knowledge at least). You're all still perfectly able to voice your views here for example. Or why don't you go to The_Donald for example. Plenty of other places on reddit will tolerate you rn.
But yeah I'd be fine if reddit banned me totally as well.
If universal agreement that something is stupid is proof it's true then you should go spam your cock in a door, everyone says it's stupid so they MUST be hiding something!
Are you anti-Semitic? I happen to be a Jew who doesn't stand for the zionist *%$&# that half my nation spews. To deny JIDF, share blue, CTR, etc, is the mark of a tool.
Lmfao that's called DISCRIMINATION. And has nothing to do with freedom of speech on privately operated websites, which is what we are talking about. What are you even talking about???
You need to go refresh yourself on the definitions of the legal words you are using because you are 100% wrong in what you are saying.
Or better yet just literally google "does private companies require free speech" and you'll see multiple articles and even case law and scholars explaining it.
But you dont want to learn any facts you would rather spew misinformation and damn right lies.
I've explained why you're wrong but it just goes put one ear and out the other. I used to think like you in regards to the 1st amendment. Turns out I was wrong just like you are.
It's actually very very specific about what is free speech. It doesnt apply to everything no matter how bad you want it to.
TMOR doesn't ask for an uprising, for killing of people or doxxing, they just make fun of you retards is all.
Its like all your doing is coming over to this sub and harassing its users. Seems like TMOR incites harassment. A reason that two of those subs were banned.
I'm with you brother. I don't even register an emotional reaction when the sleeping angry sheep come to bleat at us nor does it affect me when the shills pile on. The longer it goes on the more people start to notice that things are not as they seem. We cant force people to take the red pill, we just have to wait for others to get there themselves. The actions of the desperate to stop this process only serve to hasten it.
Q-guys are advocating violence against people because of conspiracy theories
No they weren't. Talking about indictments "around the corner" or even military tribunals, however misguided it may be, is not a "call or incitement of violence. They were talking about political and legal processes they think will happen or would like to see happen. That isn't advocating anyone go murder or inflict criminal violence on anyone.
"These people are stupid" is a Q saying which, used in this context, likely is saying Reddit is stupid. Banning all these subs at once indicates the ban was political rather than in response to real issues. Sessions is going to lay the anti-trust hammer down on these big tech companies colluding as a cartel to manipulate the political landscape.
They banned the rest of the subs because they are spin-offs of the original GA and CBTS_Stream. That’s how reddit bans work. No spinoffs allowed. Stop being a paranoid loser and think objectively here.
Well said. If anything it makes you dig into the news and see how certain events are related. We wouldn't want people thinking for themselves now would we?
This read was sooooo hilarious, I honestly couldn't stop laughing ;-) All the best and who said anything about Q...not I. Judicial Watch, William Binny and other whistleblowers on the other hand have held detailed discussions on the topic. Thanks for the laugh though well worth the read :-)
Retooling CDA 230's another possible avenue. CDA 230 lets Reddit curate content like a publisher, due to the "good samaritan" provision, let Reddit's not liable for content. I'm not a lawyer, but perhaps there's some way to bake in protection for non-inciting political speech.
No dude clearly I'm there for the balls, ducks, and jizz.
The reason I'm treating you like this is cuz we've literally been talking for a day and you have only been annoying and pestering. I don't need to fucking splay myself and prove to you who I am.
The problem with Antifa is, they go to events ready to brawl, masked up and ready to start violance. They destroy public and private property, as well as beat people up even if they are just civilians, yet if they truly believe in anti fascism they shouldn't hide their faces.
That is why they are classified as a domestic terror organisation, even Nancy Pelosi, minority leader of the Democrats condemned them.
Most importantly, those on the right side of politics who are causing violance, they should be arrested and suffer the consequences of the law as well. There was so many posts and comments on r/TheGreatAwakening board that spoke of not going down the violant path, and condemning and down voting violant Inflaming posts. I really doubt the reasons given for the banning of that sub.
When you see the Q followers at trumps rally, there not wearing masks, they are holding cardboard signs.
The fact they kept The Donald but got rid of TGA....
The Donald is a much more wild and aggressive subreddit than TGA ever was.
Quick question since that post originated from 8chan, what makes you think It violated redits TOS, or even twitters ? This is some "Ministry of Truth -1984" level of suppression here ... hopefully you never question the narrative and actually wake up else your next..
I don't give a single fuck. I have had to work with people that went to Harvard and Yale and billed hundreds of dollars an hour that were complete morons.
You get respect from me when you make an argument that is backed up by facts. And you have done nothing but repeatedly pound your chest about how smart you are, with absolutely no reference to the facts I've given in support of what I said which include: Supreme Court precedent, the opinion of the president, and statements made by the Attorney General of the United States.
Since you are the legal expert, you should be able to file as a class anyway.
Are you fucking serious? You're claiming to be a litigator and you don't know that you can't file a class action without being a licensed attorney?
2203 comments
1 onebaduce 2018-09-12
Over target
1 kittyhistoryistrue 2018-09-12
All for a LARP.
1 rickki6 2018-09-12
bingo
1 Calzoneghazi 2018-09-12
What's the timeline on that again? I've seen "it's happening" being posted in
/r/pizzagate/r/greatawakening for months now.1 SoyIsPeople 2018-09-12
It's been "just around the corner" for at least 4 months.
1 therodt 2018-09-12
LARPING TAKES TIME. Daddy is going to drop subpoenas any day now
1 cocktails5 2018-09-12
Why post FISA when you can post memes?
Get y'all priorities straight.
1 thegeneraldisarray 2018-09-12
They're controversial. They get the people going.
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
He did say to prepare the memes.
1 jimbojones230 2018-09-12
...is this sarcasm?
1 pilgrimboy 2018-09-12
From a source you can trust:
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/07/politics/andrew-mccabe-investigation-grand-jury/index.html
1 xanatos451 2018-09-12
Suddenly you guys trust CNN?
1 pilgrimboy 2018-09-12
It was for you.
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
4 months? Try two years.
1 SoyIsPeople 2018-09-12
I like your enthusiasm, but qanon has only been a thing for like 10 months, so two years is over shooting it a bit.
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
No the first Q Drops actually happened prior to October of last year. He predicted Hillary would be in prison by November 2017.
1 Ty__Guy 2018-09-12
Which post was that? I haven't seen any specific time frames.
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
https://i.imgur.com/IVH47Ar.png
1 Ty__Guy 2018-09-12
Not one mention of prison or November
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
I said by November. And this is talking about extradition for trial.
Anyway this article breaks down the bullshit quite well.
https://amp.dailydot.com/layer8/qanon-failed-predictions/
1 Ty__Guy 2018-09-12
Do think that's a good way to make a point on the conspiracy sub, citing an article written by a Rothschild?
Anyways I looked at it and the predictions for November arrests were wrong so two things I wonder before complete dismissal. How are 4chan Q posts verified to actually be Q? 8chan posting didn't start until May this year. And, what are the chances that Q has forecasted events but circumstances changed, making the forecasts based on intel incorrect?
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
Yeah it occurred to me.
The answer is they aren't.
1 bradfromearth 2018-09-12
are you not paying attention to what has in fact already happened?
1 PatriotScum 2018-09-12
Yeah guys can't you see Trump is catching all the pedos and reptiles and putting them in prison and the double fist pump is him too happy to contain that he's got Hilary and Obama locked up and Democrats got caught colluding with Russia and and Soros he's in this too. And the science community are actually overblowing climate change, thats all funded by the cabal and Trump knows this. Didn't you see the Q drop of a picture of a TV remote that's because Trump isn't watching news all day he's actually on the phone and the tv drowns out his call he's closer to convicting all the deep state than you think. Etc etc etc etc
1 abcdavis 2018-09-12
Only one day late on the same prediction made every two days. So close!
1 ShiftlessElement 2018-09-12
“Soon.”
1 lakerswiz 2018-09-12
Lol
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Not an argument.
1 lakerswiz 2018-09-12
Source (a real one) on all this FISA hoopla?
1 tt12345x 2018-09-12
Lol
1 Calzoneghazi 2018-09-12
Hold on, is this better:
Latest attack. GA banned
Ask who is really in control?
Re: FISA
Person [of] Interest. Lol.
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
Do you remember the original Q posts on 4chan?
1 whacko_jacko 2018-09-12
Yes. What a coincidence this heats up with November just around the corner.
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
No I'm talking about how he expressly dated and predicted that Podesta and Hillary would be indicted/arrested. Example. This never happened. It's now been two years since this drop and nothing.
1 BillNyeThePiousGuy 2018-09-12
Q has only been around since Halloween of 2017, so...
1 jackgibson12 2018-09-12
the picture in your own post has a timestamp, it hasnt even been one year lol
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
Ah my mistake, brain fart.
1 BERNIE2020ftw 2018-09-12
who specifically is fucked?
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
Leftists, center leftists, centrists, business leaders and politicians who criticize Trump. Pretty much anybody they disagree with allegedly.
1 ShelSilverstain 2018-09-12
So...non-retards
1 ntschaef 2018-09-12
Unfortunately. I have no doubt that the people who see the world somewhat clearly will be the ones to realize that it is falling apart. It's much easier to live in a controlled delusion.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
How long will you wait before you admit you got played?
Like, will you come to your sense in a month? A year?
1 ShelSilverstain 2018-09-12
Why is the Trump administration after them?
1 Dr_Cog_Science 2018-09-12
Honest question, in the goal of GA, why is declas taking so long? Why would anything need to be redacted in order to push a story? Shouldn't it be possible to just immediately put everything into the open?
1 LeightonKAGA 2018-09-12
Seems like a slow drip process. Kinda like boiling a frog. You and me are ready to see the massive amount of corruption from day one. Dont think others are. I believe trump has played his cards right and now alot of normies are ready for the truth about fisa gate. I think ittle come out this month. Its time.
1 luchovzla 2018-09-12
Mre phny streisand effect. The Qtards now think Q i
s SUPER legit...
1 HalfwayIllumined 2018-09-12
Right... Like wtf guys.. Same with the pizzagate sub.
1 fuckeverywhoreson 2018-09-12
(Mod-supported) Brigading, inciting violence, harassment, disseminating personal information. Claimed reason, at least.
1 luchovzla 2018-09-12
This ban will only make those Q goofs think they are “over the target”
The Q psyop is getting old..
1 fuckeverywhoreson 2018-09-12
Anything less than complete submission to their desires will "prove" to these kinds of people that they are right and that their enemies are at fault. Same old song and dance with supremacists/cultists of every flavour.
1 irrelevantappelation 2018-09-12
Like SJW's?
1 JCase455 2018-09-12
Ah yes, you know you're on to something when everyone thinks you're a fucking idiot. Clever, you.
1 irrelevantappelation 2018-09-12
I find acting like a fucking idiot is a great way to meet actual fucking idiots; hi there.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Because your post is fucking stupid.
1 irrelevantappelation 2018-09-12
Haha, so close I can see the whites of their eyes.
1 JamesColesPardon 2018-09-12
Rule 4.
1 qoa 2018-09-12
It's funny that society is so inverted right now that you have people cheering on censorship and being happy that anyone questioning that is censored. You're calling them a cult but you're rah rah rahing the suppression of ideas in favor of mass censorship by large companies. https://i.imgur.com/aZWnEAx.jpg That's a screenshot of the actual subreddit that's getting others banned. You can argue whatever you want to pro this. But in the long run it's clear what's happening. Which do you think is "the good guy" in your eyes? I know you'll side with the totalitarian approach...
1 sully3301Q 2018-09-12
I totally agree. If its nonsense, why give it so much attention? Bill cooper called it when he said theyd have people begging to take our freedoms away. Fucking idiots.
1 duplexnovella 2018-09-12
I'm sure it is...
so let us have our sub back spez
​
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
Psyop telling people to expand their thinking?
We need to make a new one...Dark to Light will continue
1 luchovzla 2018-09-12
Expand their thinking, or play in their desperation and hope for a savior?
Trump is not that savior.
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
Lead them astray?? Then why is /politics allowed as well as this page. Trump isn't a savior, but he is trying to take down the Deep State. Sad you can't get on board with that...Look at all the resignations, firings, sex trafficking/pedophile arrests that have happened since DT took office.
1 luchovzla 2018-09-12
Would a president “taking down muh deep state” implement Goldman Sachs and Bilderberg members into his cabinet?
Would he continue to drone strike civilians in the Middle East and bomb Syria under false pretenses?
Would be sign a multi billion dollar arms deal with the Saudis who bomb kids in school busses?
Would be sign a 700$+ billion military spending bill?
You got tricked.
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
To take down the DS you have to have people close to you that were in it and or still are. Keep your friends close and your enemies closer. Where's ISIS these days? SA situation is tricky, but their old strings have been cut Yes, he wants a strong military not one that is depleted.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgYsNuzZnIs
The biggest trick the devil plays is to make you think he doesn't exist. The GA was about fighting against this evil. Now it's banned. Nice trick but we who support DT and Q aren't falling for it.
1 thirdegree 2018-09-12
The problem with that saying is the devil doesn't exist.
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
Tell that to the elite/Hollywood who spread their symbolism around everywhere worshiping Horus, the Sun God, aka Lucifer, aka Devil...Many names
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
You know, Donald trump is an elite, and he's a part of "Hollywood"
But don't let that stop you lol
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
Being rich and having a TV show (one that gives people a job within his company) doesn't make him Elite. He has been vocal since the 80s on the direction our country was heading. The Elite want a one world government and are against patriotism. Trump loves America and is against everything the Elite stand for. The Elite Establishment hate him and so do you...The elite appreciate you on their team.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Lol oh boy, you're actually saying that about the guy who lives in a golden tower with his name on the side and tweets from a golden toilet in the morning.
I don't think I'll be able to find someone that can top that naivety
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
He was rich and his company was named after him. But you are saying he is elite because of that. So let's use another word because I see the confusion there. Instead of Elite I will say Deep State Cabal. Because that's who I was referring too.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
"Deep state" is another way of saying "anyone who doesn't submit to trump"
Once you realize that's all it takes to become "deep state" you'll see things clearer.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Look at how many were IN HIS OWN CABINET
Like seriously. You think the guy trying to slob on Putin's knob is doing anything to fight corruption or organized crime? Motherfucker the Russian mob is the Russian government! The Russian mob is also one of the largest human trafficking operations on the planet, so that alone should show you how off base this whole thing is.
Mark my words. The only reason trump would interfere with human trafficking is to get a cut of the action.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Lol reduced to begging the (((deep state)))
Where's all the tough talk now?
1 duplexnovella 2018-09-12
Ahhh irony via assholes...thx
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Maybe if you kiss their feet a little they'll have pity on you
1 JamesColesPardon 2018-09-12
Rule 6.
1 bradfromearth 2018-09-12
then why would they ban it?? serious question? any good answers?
​
1 luchovzla 2018-09-12
I think they’re going for a reverse psychology thing, to make the Qultists think they’re “over the target” and ultimately radicalize them.
Flooding this sub with them is also a by product, and we know how much of a conservative pro administration bias they have.
1 deleteme123 2018-09-12
Nonsense. GA had lots of non-American subscribers.
1 TMORCanEat1000Dicks 2018-09-12
It's totally normal for the entire mainstream media, even pro-Trump MAGA supporters and conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones, to organize attack pieces costing millions of dollars on a conspiracy theory, just like they did with Pizzagate and Pedogate (both of which are TOTALLY untrue, as we know), because they just altruistically want to inform us to the dangers of believing those bloodthirsty LARPers!***
***If you believe this, you're an idiot and don't belong here
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
If universal agreement that something is stupid is proof it's true then you should go spam your cock in a door, everyone says it's stupid so they MUST be hiding something!
1 TMORCanEat1000Dicks 2018-09-12
LMFAO nice, an appeal to the crowd AND . And you nailed it - when both sides of the establishment and obvious shills like Jones are universally attacking ONE thing just to stop people from looking into it, you can bet your ass they're very scared of it, brainlet. Nothing is an accident in politics, and coincidences don't exist when it comes to stuff at this level.
But Nice Try
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
You guys are unreal.
1 TMORCanEat1000Dicks 2018-09-12
You guys aren't very bright
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Lol, and you'll prove us all wrong... Any day now...
1 deleteme123 2018-09-12
Any screenshots of alleged misconduct? (Prepares for downvotes)😽
1 pinkmaybebabycrazy 2018-09-12
Here's a collection another poster had: https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/9fczd4/rgreatawakening_had_to_go_but_theres_no_reason/e5vo8cw/
1 ozeor 2018-09-12
Uhhh that's pretty damning. No wonder they got banned.
1 mmersault 2018-09-12
The mods there were completely useless.
1 maniachamp 2018-09-12
That’s not damming you idiot. You don’t think there’s language like that in r/politics concerning trump?
1 theMoly 2018-09-12
This is where you put up or shut up.
1 ozeor 2018-09-12
That's your response? To launch into a personal insult then attempt to deflect? What he posted is pretty bad, I'm sure you can back your side of it up and show me the language you speak of.
1 overbite50 2018-09-12
Constantly saw upvoted comments calling for public hangings over there.
1 Deaconblues18 2018-09-12
What’s scary about this is “they” could pepper this sub with this behavior and get it banned. And lots of other subs, I presume. I think 70% of you are dicks/douchebags but I love this sub!
1 barcelonatimes 2018-09-12
Oh, so just like SRS, AHS, /r/esist, and many other subs? I bet they're shaking in their boots. The ban is surely ready to fall on them, right?
1 HGpennypacker 2018-09-12
I'd say less that and more the calls for executing Obama. But whatever floats your boat, man.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
You're making that up. Produce a screenshot of a single person who called for Obama to be executed without a trial that was not banned immediately.
1 fuckeverywhoreson 2018-09-12
Fair.
How is that supposed to even work?
1 garfield-1-2323 2018-09-12
When a username is banned, typically the post that got it banned is removed, and it can no longer post.
1 Dudley421 2018-09-12
I love you. You're one of my favorite Redditors. Never stop being awesome.
1 Stitchface 2018-09-12
Okay let me just go over to the sub to do a search just to make sure....
oh wait.
1 fuckeverywhoreson 2018-09-12
Convenient, ain't it.
1 jimbojones230 2018-09-12
Yes, because banning a sub wipes any and all evidence of its existence from the internet, and it’s impossible to ever know what the contents were.
1 whacko_jacko 2018-09-12
Q told us to archive everything offline.
1 deleteme123 2018-09-12
Archive.org
1 BASEDME7O 2018-09-12
Lmao how could you be this delusional. It’s in almost every thread.
1 leftofmarx 2018-09-12
"without a trial"
Se, that's the thing, though. The Q people want the military, who ostensibly just staged a coup of what Q says is true (which also means Q supporters are unpatriotic coup supporters...) - they want the military, the military which has staged a coup and overthrown the actual government of the USA, to try and convict and hang political leaders they don't like.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
No. We want anyone who can legally do so to try and convict and hang anyone who actually commits treason. That's not "calling for violence" it's calling for justice.
1 LurkPro3000 2018-09-12
Yeah. Pretty sure most people don't call for violence - and if they do subs like these always call those people out.
Most people don't want violence, they want people to know the truth. That is why the ban happens.
1 tamrix 2018-09-12
So why can't anyone go onto r/politics and post the same message and have r/politics banned?
I'm sure you could fire up enough shill accounts to make it look legit.
1 lowercase_capitalist 2018-09-12
Should any sub where someone calls for executing Trump also be banned? If I go to /r/politics and call for Trump to be executed, should it be banned too?
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Look at the damage control ITT.
1 ToddWhiskey 2018-09-12
Or, The Storm is upon us.
1 YaBoyNick 2018-09-12
Q predicted this xD.
seriously though why is reddit such a cuckhole right now, at least leave the schizos their containment board.
1 SIGHR 2018-09-12
my thoughts as well, keep the retards in the cage
1 YaBoyNick 2018-09-12
💯
1 Th3_Admiral 2018-09-12
Speaking of damage control, why is there a sudden influx of accounts with no posting history waking up to defend the banned subreddits? Just look through some of the accounts in this thread. Several accounts with no history in Conspiracy or GreatAwakening all making very similar claims. It seems like someone has activated a bunch of their sockpuppet accounts to try to control the narrative in this thread.
1 TheFansHitTheShit 2018-09-12
Posts from banned subreddits usually don't show upon a persons post history, so that could be why.
1 potentialnrg 2018-09-12
Because when the sub is banned all the posts on great awakening are also deleted. All of mine went away. A lot of people made accounts and had only ever posted on great awakening, hence they now have no post history.
1 Th3_Admiral 2018-09-12
Ah, that might be a part of it. I'm sure that's the case with a few of them. But there a couple that had almost no karma at all, so I don't think they had posting in one of the banned subs for months/years. I also noticed two accounts yesterday that just started posting for the first time after 8 months and 5 years of inactivity.
1 ToddWhiskey 2018-09-12
All your post are belong to us.
1 mrsuns10 2018-09-12
So are you saying that I'm a sockpocket even though I comment every day on this site?
1 Th3_Admiral 2018-09-12
Nope, I'm specifically referring to these accounts with little or no post/comment history, no karma, and large gaps between activation and their first posts. I've had a feel people point out that comments in banned subs won't show up in their history so that might explain some of these accounts, but I had already tagged a few yesterday before any of these bans took place.
1 JulianAsausage 2018-09-12
Lol, sub banned.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Yep, admins are stalking this thread.
1 thegeneraldisarray 2018-09-12
The shills are out we must be! Jesus Christ. I remember 4chan when CBTS was the board then toxic bakers, namefags and other assorted folks came out of the woodwork - THEN the bot wars - holy shit the bots responded to each other and even recognized text in memes. That was when Mein Kampf spammer and the Canadian baker went to war. It was SO MUCH FUN!
1 Absh4x0r 2018-09-12
Hello normies, prepare for your hospital trips, your mind won't be able to cope with the truth.
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
I've been waiting for two years, will you make me wait 2 more?
1 Absh4x0r 2018-09-12
Just wait for it
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
I enjoy edging like a normal person, but COME ON.
1 Absh4x0r 2018-09-12
Then don't wait for it, it is inevitable. At this point it's a question of acceptance. People will have a hard time with this one.
1 joey_bosas_ankles 2018-09-12
...and destroyed by intense anti-aircraft fire, apparently. LOL
1 epium 2018-09-12
Anyone know a back-up/alternative?
1 IO_you_new_socks 2018-09-12
https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/find-help/index.shtml
Here you go!
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Lol. No one on r/conspiracy gives gold. The admins are stalking this thread.
Spez is a cannibal.
1 JonnySkidmore 2018-09-12
I've heard somewhere that u/spez has altered user comments, thus negating this sites protections. I call on u/JWFitton to look into this matter
1 ApugalypseNow 2018-09-12
Reddit became Digg so quickly! I've never been in death throes before!
1 ssilBetulosbA 2018-09-12
It's sad. They are simply destroying themselves. Eventually if this continues, the majority of people will leave anyway, Reddit will lose profits and the end result will be a echo-chamber platform, filled with bots and corporate shills, where you won't really be able to find any interesting opinions. The sheer variety of opinions, not matter how controversial was what always made Reddit so interesting.
They are shooting themselves in the head.
On the other hand, if we look at it more from a conspiratorial point of view, perhaps someone is simply forcing their hand and they really have no option other than to shoot themselves in the head.
1 Friday_The_13th 2018-09-12
Voat is probably thrilled.
Reddit logic: We need to ban these fringe subs so that the users will either quit or move to other subs and cause problems in them.
1 3568161333 2018-09-12
Said from his echo chamber.
1 ASaltedRainbow 2018-09-12
We'll be so sad when you leave
1 ApugalypseNow 2018-09-12
You really shouldn't. I'm a complete stranger typing in his online diary that everyone can read. People take this social media bullshit so seriously.
1 suprmario 2018-09-12
He was being facetious...
1 FreonPurple 2018-09-12
People like you will eventually come to wherever the rest of us go, it always happens that way. Just like you followed us from Digg to Reddit. I really wish you wouldn't, though.
1 pedantic_cheesewheel 2018-09-12
HAHAHAHA, thanks man, that really brightened my afternoon.
Lol, "death throes"
1 ApugalypseNow 2018-09-12
Dewey Beats Truman
1 pedantic_cheesewheel 2018-09-12
Wtf does that even mean? That someone called a result before verification? That would be you in this situation predicting the imminent and immediate collapse of an extremely popular website because the admins are protecting the company from the fallout that inevitably comes from toxic communities.
1 Foundmyvape 2018-09-12
Go pay for your own server and you won’t have to worry about violating a tos.
1 ApugalypseNow 2018-09-12
I absolutely agree with that argument. Where did I say otherwise? I just think Reddit is Digging itself. When the mods and admins look for creative ways and streeeeetch the TOS to ban users, values are misaligned.
1 morkman100 2018-09-12
Didn't you get gilded like 4-5 times in one thread a month ago or so?
1 Jediknightluke 2018-09-12
crickets
1 ObviousAltisObvious_ 2018-09-12
Only leftist shills exist. That's it. End of story. All right wing people are the perfect humans and patriots.
1 Buy_The-Ticket 2018-09-12
Man I'm so glad you got pissed and ranted at me this morning. your comments are hilarious. Keep it up!
1 Dave-C 2018-09-12
https://www.reddit.com/user/theciasellsdrugs/gilded/
1 trjones1 2018-09-12
Rekt
1 bennysanders 2018-09-12
u/TheCIASellsDrugs why are you such a liar?
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Lol. Get a life.
1 bennysanders 2018-09-12
womp womp
1 IFuckingLoveTahdig 2018-09-12
Didn't you gild yourself once? Lol mongoloid.
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
says the looney toon that has a mental issue LOL
1 ShellOilNigeria 2018-09-12
Removed. Rule 10.
1 memesarentreal 2018-09-12
Seriously. It's pretty unreal that their standards of evidence consist of tweets and screenshots of 4chan posts.
1 its_not_brian 2018-09-12
also voat threads
1 spyd3rweb 2018-09-12
He's gonna need the number to the nearest burn ward too.
1 penpractice 2018-09-12
lmao
1 Dr_Cog_Science 2018-09-12
I love you!
1 JamesColesPardon 2018-09-12
Removed. Rule 10.
1 lottapoppa 2018-09-12
8ch
qmap
1 battles 2018-09-12
all of these are cesspools
1 NeoBey 2018-09-12
So was greatawakening
1 lottapoppa 2018-09-12
then check out [cnn](cnn.com) [bbc](bbc.co.uk) [pbs](pbs.org)
1 Dave-C 2018-09-12
Do you not find it strange that the "cesspools" as you call it are the only places this idiocy is welcome?
1 CommaHorror 2018-09-12
Looks like ,voat is done now too.
1 PrivatePyle 2018-09-12
Voat just wasn't ready for the influx of traffic they are experiencing. Hopefully, they will get it worked out.
1 lottapoppa 2018-09-12
voat was always a half-assed site. the main admin usually checks 1-2 times every 48 hours with no alerting. it regularly crashes because of (no disk space) or some nonsense
1 CommaHorror 2018-09-12
8ch is so, confusing. How do I see, their interpretations of q’s posts?
1 lottapoppa 2018-09-12
8ch is more like a bulletin board at the supermarket, there's no real way to organized, just browse and dismiss what you like.
1 CommaHorror 2018-09-12
I remember I would click a link and be taken into the middle of a conversation on 8ch before. Now I’m at something like a table of contents and don’t even, know where, to begin!
1 pby1000 2018-09-12
Voat.co
1 sun-usta-be-yellow 2018-09-12
Many a goats were born on this blessed day.
1 pby1000 2018-09-12
Lol. Yes they were.
1 Pattycake001 2018-09-12
Voat's down now too.
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
Probably a child porn chat room or a Klan meeting
1 lambo2011 2018-09-12
saidit
1 PedostaDaMelosta 2018-09-12
Zeronet.io
1 franktortuga 2018-09-12
https://voat.co/v/theawakening
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
SS: Reddit censorship of the narrative continues, r/greatawakening was just banned.
1 blowtheroofoff 2018-09-12
yet the twin sub the_greatawakening is still up
1 Alptraum626 2018-09-12
Its banned now
1 Shit_in_a_Shoe 2018-09-12
Nope it's banned too now lol.
1 GranimalSnake 2018-09-12
Hit up Voat and search for "Awakening".
We're not going down that easy.
1 Rufflenuggins 2018-09-12
Thanks for directing us to voat. :)
1 cocktails5 2018-09-12
Have fun with that!
1 superfluid 2018-09-12
So you mean we get to get rid of you goofs and also burden the racists on Voat with you all? Win, win, win!
1 GranimalSnake 2018-09-12
Soon, when you are shouting into the empty echo chamber... and you hear yourself utter such angry nonsense... then, you'll understand.
Until then... I'm sorry you hurt inside.
1 superfluid 2018-09-12
I guess you're speaking from experience?
1 GranimalSnake 2018-09-12
I'm rubber and your glue? That's what you have?
1 superfluid 2018-09-12
No really, I'm curious. Or are you so completely devoid of self reflection?
1 ToddWhiskey 2018-09-12
Bam! Gone as well.
1 Adarcer 2018-09-12
that one got banned to ... all the Q ones did... all conveniently violated the rules at the same time.. here is a list:
1 LockemALLup 2018-09-12
It is now banned as well.
1 QMS235 2018-09-12
What rules could they have possibly broken? They stayed confined to their sub entirely, never advocated for brigade government, and were very clear that they had no racist opinions (patriots don’t have a skin color ideas). I really wonder what the justification was.
1 axi0m17 2018-09-12
They didn't break any rules, they were simply exposing the truth so they had to be shut down. This is getting out of control.
1 sideofbutterplease 2018-09-12
They never exposed shit
1 Th3_Admiral 2018-09-12
That account is also only four months old and has never posted here or to any of the GreatAwakening subs before now either. There are actually quite a few of these accounts waking up from months of silence to suddenly be outraged.
1 tehbantho 2018-09-12
Ding ding ding.
1 svenbreakfast 2018-09-12
They exposed themselves. I'm going to miss it. A place where basement dwelling unlaunched youth could mingle with their overmedicated shut-in boomer parents.
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
Out of their control, yes.
1 BigRed112358 2018-09-12
They are just banning those subs to make all the incels think they were on to something and feel validated. Reddit is just a tool now like everything else.
1 dsk123 2018-09-12
Yeah these nice people are just trying to help.
1 letsgo2jupiter 2018-09-12
Yup yup. Although the deep state is real
1 MG87 2018-09-12
Lol what truth? These morons were literally wrong about everything.
1 axi0m17 2018-09-12
If they are wrong then please explain the massive efforts by msm, social media, and other major outlets to censor the information that they are bringing to light. All for a larp? All for a conspiracy? If it wasn’t for the media reporting on it, the number of followers would be half of what it is rn.
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
None were broken, i was a mod there for a second. Moderation was SUPER STRICT about any calls for violence. Posts were immediately taken down once reported. And that was maybe a handful of posts a week that were basically "X should hang"...i never saw anything more than that
This is 100% bullshit.
1 QMS235 2018-09-12
I agree. If those few statements were enough to warrant a ban, there’s numerous left leaning subs that should be banned for calling for Trump to be put to death. You’ve over target.
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
just search for trump and hang and mass report to the admins, fuck them and fuck reddit
1 QMS235 2018-09-12
And what will that do? We know damn well that these subs aren’t being banned for inciting violence, and reporting those comments to the admins won’t do shit. They want you to think you’re in a minority. They want you to think you’re alone in your beliefs. They want you to think that everyone is against you, and you’re wrong for thinking any differently than them. They don’t want you to know just how many people there are that oppose their bullshit. They want to make sure your voice is unheard, and even though I don’t want to see this happen, there’s only one way this ends.
“A riot is the language of the unheard” -MLK
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
it does do something, i was notified today by the admins that a number of people were banned that i reported last week. If they want to play this game, so can we.
1 Therealcodyg 2018-09-12
Nice. Confirmed left leaning reddit users CAN be banned. Ergo this ‘reddit is anti-right’ conspiracy has been debunked. Thank you for your service.
1 jdotg 2018-09-12
Why would the admins tell you who they banned? Thats pretty unrprecedented.
Most mod teams dont speak on judgement they've made regarding users other than yourself.
In other words, im calling bullshit on your comment.
1 jimbojones230 2018-09-12
Pack it up, friend...you’ve already lost.
1 STOP-STABBING-ME 2018-09-12
Maybe they just don't want to provide a platform for cancerous insanity of the Qtards.
1 QMS235 2018-09-12
What made them cancerous? They stayed to themselves for the most part. Why does reddit not only allow, but seem to encourage other kinds of “insanity”? When did we decide it’s ok for these major social networks to decide who does and who doesn’t get a platform?
1 STOP-STABBING-ME 2018-09-12
When did we decide that being a cancerous moron is a virtue?
1 QMS235 2018-09-12
Who made you the authority on what is “cancerous” and what is not?
1 STOP-STABBING-ME 2018-09-12
Who are you to question me?
1 QMS235 2018-09-12
Who are you to believe you’re unquestionable?
1 STOP-STABBING-ME 2018-09-12
Now you're telling me what I believe? Are you a mind reader? Are you the All Powerful Q?
1 QMS235 2018-09-12
You’re pretty easy to read, it doesn’t take a genius to see you got pretty offended when you thought you were being “questioned”
1 STOP-STABBING-ME 2018-09-12
Bullseye! That was so spooky I got chills up and down my spine. Are you Q's boss, DoubleQ?
1 QMS235 2018-09-12
Obviously.
1 ExpensiveBurn 2018-09-12
Please, post your results. I frequent a few lefty subs and I can't recall ever seeing someone call for Trump to hang (unless it's the logical conclusion after a trial for treason), so I'd be really interested in seeing that. I'll even help you report it, because I think that kind of stuff is fucked up.
1 whacko_jacko 2018-09-12
This was always the baseline assumption when people talked about that kind of stuff on /r/greatawakening.
1 pilgrimboy 2018-09-12
You realize that the Q community is all about trials for treason right, and not just hangings willy nilly.
1 Foundmyvape 2018-09-12
Secret military trials.
1 exoticstructures 2018-09-12
Who are they accusing of treason?
1 pilgrimboy 2018-09-12
John McCain would be one of the bigger ones. The theory is that he helped arm ISIS while they were supposedly enemies.
1 lakerswiz 2018-09-12
And how many of those comments existed that weren't reported therefore we never removed?
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
i'd say in a major thread with tons of comments...never.
on a thread no one saw, probably minimal.
Keep in mind GA's predecessor was banned so the entire time it existed there was a CONSTANT push to abide by admin rules.
1 AFreshBowlOfSoup 2018-09-12
cry about it lmao
1 Chokaholic 2018-09-12
Agree man. I had a comment of mine removed there for saying HRC should be tried for treason, and if found guilty, should be punishable by death.
1 DeepPast 2018-09-12
Can confirm he was a mod for a bit.
1 a_full_empty 2018-09-12
if mods have to be super strict about calls for violence in a sub and are constantly taking them down, then maybe just maybe that's not the kind of sub that reddit wants to host. just a thought.
1 Dr_Cog_Science 2018-09-12
We're* Too bad you didn't use your mod power to remove hate speech and post that incited violence. Sorry...
1 DJBlu-Ray 2018-09-12
Can you link me to the site that has all of the Q content archived?
1 RealLifePolygamist 2018-09-12
I'm guessing the growing disappointment and lack of action led to more calls for violence and the mods couldn't/wouldn't remove it.
1 whacko_jacko 2018-09-12
I saw no evidence to support your hypothesis.
1 FlaminEddy 2018-09-12
there were never any calls for violence.
1 RealLifePolygamist 2018-09-12
Never? Never anything about lynching Clinton/Obama/McCain/Bush etc.?
Never any talk about taking up arms?
Never any talk of civil war?
1 FlaminEddy 2018-09-12
Yes never. There were never any calls to violence. there were talks of military tribunals or detention of the people that you mention but never anything about lynching, or a civil war, or a call to arms you're making that shit up
1 blowtheroofoff 2018-09-12
reason given seems to be "inciting violence"... very reminiscent of /r/pizzagate which had a influx of brand new accounts calling for public lynchings on the day it was banned, I'd be interested to see if this was the same
never paid much attention to all this Q bollocks before but all this does is give them more credibility
1 Adarcer 2018-09-12
this
1 3568161333 2018-09-12
Oh, pizzagate... the thing that culminated with a man shooting into a closet thinking it was a basement.
1 fuckeverywhoreson 2018-09-12
There was a debacle a few weeks back where they (down to the mods, supposedly) zeroed in on brigading a "satanic" satire account on Twitter. Plenty of threats, pictures of houses under reticules, statements to "you think you won't but you're totally gonna get it"-type sentiments and whatnot.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-09-12
Never saw that, and I visited every single day.
1 pilgrimboy 2018-09-12
Same here. Visited there all the time. Got on Reddit to see what was happening there. Never heard of or saw that.
I think one of the issues with Reddit is any malicious group could do that in another sub. And instead of just banning the participants, Reddit bans the sub.
1 Tacsol5 2018-09-12
That's exactly what happened. I knew the sub was in trouble with all the "new" traffic that was showing up recently. Fake accounts making bullshit posts that would be taken at face value and used to shut it down. It worked.
1 Foundmyvape 2018-09-12
It’s up to mods to ban and remove comments like that. If mods are unable to operate a sub in a way that adheres to the tos they should expect the subs removal.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-09-12
Pretty simple tactic. Gather a bunch of people, raid a sub, post shit that goes against the TOS.
Reddit does absolutely, nothing, about this. And we all see it happen.
1 deleteme123 2018-09-12
Proof please.
1 WrestlingWithMadness 2018-09-12
A lot of the links aren't active anymore, but you can get a very detailed story here.
​
https://www.reddit.com/r/TopMindsOfReddit/comments/985l9y/huge_effortpost_ive_documented_the/
1 AutoModerator 2018-09-12
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
Soaring to close to the sun, aka the truth.
1 MG87 2018-09-12
Lolno
1 jiggawatts214 2018-09-12
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Let's start talking about a coordinated response.
Memes?
Contacting reddit's executives, board members, and advertisers?
Coordinating a legal action by all the people they are banning without any reason?
1 sideofbutterplease 2018-09-12
What possible legal action could there be?
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Breach of contract
1 sideofbutterplease 2018-09-12
"Without advance notice and at any time, we may, for violations of this agreement or for any other reason we choose: (1) suspend your access to reddit, (2) suspend or terminate Your Account or reddit gold membership, and/or (3) remove any of your User Content from reddit."
When you sign up you agree to these terms so I think your lawsuit would be dead in the water. Start a gofundme and challenge them anyway would be intersting to watch unfold.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
You can write "I will not allow blacks to enter my apartment" into a lease, but that doesn't make it enforceable. And censoring political opinions you like is probably not an allowable reason.
1 sideofbutterplease 2018-09-12
Guess you'll have to take it to court and find out!
1 whacko_jacko 2018-09-12
That's... exactly what he was proposing!
1 Krabban 2018-09-12
In the vast majority of states it is.
Race/ethnicity, Religion, Sex/Gender and Age apply nationwide in the US thanks to the Civil Rights Act. Citizenship, Pregnancy and Veterans are other protected classes which apply in the entire US thanks to other acts.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
There are exceptions such as companies trying to restrict free speech when they have a monopoly on the area where the speech occurs:
And you also have things like misrepresentation in contract law, which makes it a breach of contract for one party to make false representations to cause people to enter a contract. Reddit claims to be a place where you can say whatever you want as long as you follow the rules. If they actually ban anyone who expresses opinions you don't like, they breached the contract with their users and could be forced to stop doing that, pay users the value of the content they submitted under the false representation, etc.
1 PM_me_storytime 2018-09-12
So you can’t make a new subreddit?
1 Etoiles_mortant 2018-09-12
Race is a protected class. Political belief is not.
While you are generaly right that EULA and Terms of service are not easily enforceable, it's almost impossible that a court will rule you in your favour if you can't show damages. And even then you would just be compensated. You still wouldn't regain access.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsh_v._Alabama
1 Kind_Of_A_Dick 2018-09-12
This is hilarious.
1 Sea_crimes 2018-09-12
I've had a rough couple of days and this thread actually made me LOL, so that's nice.
1 Ability2canSonofSam 2018-09-12
Holy fuck. You want to sue reddit because they shut down your cuckoo clock? Better call Saul... oh, wait. I’m pretty sure you WOULDNT call anyone named Saul...
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
1 Sloppy1sts 2018-09-12
Thank you for understanding how we feel about you.
Is there any precedent of someone in a position similar to yours suing and winning?
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
There are some cases out there, I haven't seen any very similar to an unjust enrichment claim against a social media site for concealing/misrepresenting the fact that they ban certain viewpoints, or demanding that they stop censoring certain viewpoints under the 1st Amendment because they control the place where political speech occurs.
1 tricheboars 2018-09-12
your understanding of the first amendment is horrendous. but thanks for revealing how dumb you are for our enjoyment.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Not an argument.
1 tricheboars 2018-09-12
I know. None of us are debating your intelligence. We all think you're dumb.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
I find your arguments logical and persuasive.
1 CelineHagbard 2018-09-12
Removed. Rule 4.
1 AwesomesaucePhD 2018-09-12
That's not how the 1st amendment works. It prevents you from Government retaliation. People and private companies are allowed to tell you to fuck off their service and as long as their EULA allows it (which the EULA does) they can ban you for it.
I can't tell if you're trolling or not but just in case you're not I figured I'd give you a crash course in the first amendment.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsh_v._Alabama
1 AwesomesaucePhD 2018-09-12
Did you actually read why they ruled that way? It was because it was restricting Marsh's right to free speech. You are more than welcome to post your crazy ass opinions anywhere on the internet just not here. Your rights are not being restricted. You are just told you can't post them here. Same as a store kicking out protesters. You can protest outside the store just not in it.
1 STOP-STABBING-ME 2018-09-12
Is the Q larp really good at attracting retards or is it actually making people retarded?
1 Ability2canSonofSam 2018-09-12
Why not both?
1 Ability2canSonofSam 2018-09-12
I don’t need to have passed the bar to know that you’re not going to do a fucking thing. You’re gonna piss and moan on the internet about how you’ve been wronged, but you’re not gonna do a fucking thing. Your shit ass sub is gone, and you’re butthurt. You’re not even going to call a lawyer.
Think about law [and] order
Why did Elliott leave?
Think [Dick] Wolf
(((867))) = 5309
Think Jenny
Where we go one, we get mocked for our batshit crazy posts.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Lol.
1 Ability2canSonofSam 2018-09-12
Fucking do it then. File some legal shit, redact what’s necessary and post it. Otherwise, your silly misquotes don’t mean shit.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Please excuse me for not taking your advice on this matter.
1 Ability2canSonofSam 2018-09-12
Is this where I should misquote you saying “Nope, there’s no legal ground for me to stand on, and I’m never going to be able to back up my bullshit claim”?
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
What?
1 koleye 2018-09-12
https://i.imgur.com/eipugIu.jpg
1 rob_van_dang 2018-09-12
Oh my god I have never seen a more appropriate use of this image.
1 Etoiles_mortant 2018-09-12
Your Marsh V Alabama case has nothing to do with political belief. It's 50% about religious belief which IS a protected class and 50% about first amendment. Also, if it was an attempt to play the "private company and first amendment rights" card, you should have used the latest case of Lloyd Corp V Tanner, which, shocker, rules that they can infringe on your right of expression.
But You didn't circulate that case with .jpgs on Great Awakening because it's against what you think its correct, right?
Regarding damages, please read what damages are. Its not a random buzz word, it has a legal meaning. Your example is a joke. Who are you to demand that the money person X paid to Reddit for ad revenue is to be returned? Did YOU, as theCIAcellsDrugs had any damages? Have you had any contract with Reddit regarding ad revenue that results from your "effort"? If not, then there is no case.
Seriously, its the second time this month I reply to you because you downgrade law to emotions. You might want to consult a lawyer if you really believe that is a legal issue instead of just trolling in an echo chamber for feel-good points.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
First of all, don't mouth off when you don't know jack shit about the law.
No, it isn't. The words "protected class" don't appear anywhere in the case. You made that up. So, we've established that you're insulting me and you have literally no clue what you're even talking about. The actual court case (did you read it before you started talking shit?) rejects the claimed right to discriminate because:
Lloyd said you can't hand out leaflets in a mall. A mall is in the business of selling goods. Completely different situation. Reddit is selling you the promise of a speech platform. Speech is their entire business.
Still mouthy. Still wrong. Crack a basic legal dictionary and find the word "restitution"
What's that you say? You can recover damages when a party breaches a contract that are based on the other party's gain without your own loss? u/Etoiles_mortant was insulting people when they didn't understand basic concepts in contract law? Even after being given sources to correct their prior incoherent rambling?
1 Etoiles_mortant 2018-09-12
I won't even bother to answer fully. A case about JW on a corporate town has nothing to do with religion as a protected class? Lloyd is about leaflets when the test employed was "can they perform their right of expression nearby"? Civic unjust enrichment without contract? I don't know which joke is bigger.
Please go ahead and sue. You have a slam-dunk case. Call a lawyer now. It's free money. Why you are not taking your millions?
Let us know how the phone call will go. We need a laugh.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Yeah. That's why the court didn't mention "protected class." You seem to be thinking of protected forms of speech, which is a totally different concept. One focuses on the person discriminated against, the other focuses on the type of speech prohibited.
These are very basic constitutional law concepts that I learned in high school civics class. The fact that you don't know these things and are still mouthing off about it is simply childish.
Do you literally believe that I'm not allowed to talk about how the law works unless I plan to go file a lawsuit tomorrow morning? It sounds like you actually believe that.
1 Etoiles_mortant 2018-09-12
Again you are wrong on the case, talk a constitutional lawyer. The case is about religious freedom on the first amendment. Since you liked the case via Wikipedia you would be pleased to know that the same site has it under The free exercise of religion -> Solicitation by religious groups. But I am sure its not about religious freedom.
Stay at your high school civics teachings. Be honest with yourself. Don't answer, I care about the answer. Just ask yourself: Had you even heard of Marsh V Alabama before bothering with Q?
YOU started talking about filing a lawsuit and even gave a stupid example. If you were not wronged, then stop complaining. If you were wronged and don't care, then also stop complaining. If you believe you are wrong and care about it, file a case. If you don't you are either a lair or a coward.
Goodnight.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
No, I'm not.
No, it isn't. It's about whether the 1st Amendment applies to certain parties or not.
I'll do whatever the fuck I please with complete disregard to your opinion.
1 Yetimang 2018-09-12
Where in Marsh does it say that the company town was "in the business of speech" or that what the business of any given entity has any bearing on whether or not this analysis applies? You made that up. So we've established that you've cited exactly one case that you don't actually understand and you have literally no clue what you're even talking about.
You've clearly never set foot in a law school. You can't just scream "Restitutionary damages" and suddenly get someone's ad revenue. Your contract to use reddit is not part of the same transaction as reddit's contracts with their advertisers. Restitution is not just randomly given out, but you'd know that if you actually studied law instead of just battering the keyboard with random words you heard once in between licking the cheeto dust off your fingers.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
I didn't say that it did. If you aren't even reading what I wrote I'm not going to waste time engaging with you.
1 Yetimang 2018-09-12
Wipe the spit off your chin and try to keep up with yourself.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
The test I applied is from the quote directly above that. Funny that you're mouthing off about "keeping up" when you literally don't even understand what I said.
1 Yetimang 2018-09-12
Yeah and that quote doesn't say anything about the business of the entity mattering in any way.
Here's an easier answer: Cyber Promotions v. America Online
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
That is exactly what it says:
Malls are open to the public in order to allow people to go there and buy goods. Reddit is open to the public because the public discussion space they provide is literally their business. I can't even imagine a business that would more fully meet the test.
The Cyber Promotions case is way different. That's commercial speech (far less 1st Amendment protection) and it's spamming people, and therefore obnoxious. Reddit is messages sent out to people who want to participate in the discussion.
1 Yetimang 2018-09-12
All that says is the more that a property is open to public use (specifically standing in for state or municipal functions) the more it's property rights have to be limited by the rights of the people using it. It says nothing about the nature of the business affecting this analysis.
From Cyber Promotions:
Here the court is more clearly defining the test for Marsh. The service has to have so much influence over the exercise of the individual's rights that they are effectively standing in for the state. Reddit does not meet that standard.
Nowhere in the opinion does the commercial nature of the speech affect the decision. Commercial speech does technically get less protection than political speech, but it's not just a blanket value judgment that pops up here and there. There are specific limitations that have to meet constitutional tests like Central Hudson, which you have not cited.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Sessions just said he's considering antitrust against several of the largest providers like facebook and twitter. They clearly meet that test, and reddit, as a large provider in that space very likely meets that test, especially if you consider the way that a handful of companies with similarly restrictive policies control almost all of the social media space.
The case would turn entirely on that test, and there's a much stronger case to be made against reddit than you're acknowledging.
1 Yetimang 2018-09-12
Antitrust charges have been brought against many business entities, it doesn't mean they stand in for the state. They're completely different concepts. This isn't how legal analysis works.
Besides, it hasn't even happened yet. They're considering a probe, they haven't even started really investigating let alone secured a conviction.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
This is why people hate lawyers. You latch onto details so that you can intentionally misunderstand what someone said and then pretend like they're wrong. What I said was right, you're just playing word games.
If a company is so big that antitrust action is being brought, it's pretty safe to say that they are also acting more like the town square than a private forum with a few hundred members.
Irrelevant. You won't even concede that I have a point (not only do I have a point, but I'm probably right, especially if Kavanaugh is on the bench when the case lands there) even though it's glaringly obvious from a simple observation of what's going on.
Stop nitpicking about words, and absorb the fact that the president is on twitter saying social media censorship is illegal and needs to stop. Given that fact, it's not at all unreasonable to think that a suit against social media companies is above the level of frivolous that you're pretending it is.
1 Yetimang 2018-09-12
I thought that you were the only one here who understood how this would really go down in the courts and you doubted I had any legal training at all. Now its lawyers who have it all wrong too? Give me a fucking break. You realized this bullshit you're throwing around would be laughed out of the courtroom so now you change tactics and say it's the courts who are wrong and they just play word games because you don't have the legal training to understand them and probably couldn't hack it in law school anyway--you cling to one case that you think says what you want to hear but ignore a later one as "word games". Which is it, huh? Do you stand by legal precedent or is it just lawyers' mumbo jumbo? You don't get to have it both ways.
1 Yetimang 2018-09-12
Is that the only case that you know?
1 no_muslim 2018-09-12
Are you paying rent to post here?
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
I will be happy to pro bono my services as your lawyer.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Not only do we have a bunch of brigaders who don't understand the law, we have an actual lawyer who is making fun of me but doesn't have a clue what is actually wrong with what I said (nothing).
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
Shit, who's the lawyer?
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
If you're not a lawyer, you might want to refrain from offering to "pro bono my services as your lawyer."
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
No I'd totally represent you, as your lawyer. For free.
1 just_a_timetraveller 2018-09-12
Dude. You support a president who would strip you of even more power to fight against corporations.. You not just dumb. You supa dumb.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
That's the opposite of true. President Trump has been all over twitter calling viewpoint discrimination on social media illegal.
1 duckraul2 2018-09-12
And gutting the CFPB of authority and leadership to advocate on behalf of consumers against corporations fits into that how? He rants on Twitter against companies and people who run companies he doesn't like. Him saying a thing is illegal doesn't make it so, that isn't actually doing anything for you or for your cause.
1 trippedwire 2018-09-12
I’d be interested in hearing your thoughts on NFL players kneeling.
1 SIGHR 2018-09-12
are you 14?
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misrepresentation
Next time, don't mouth off when you don't understand something and you won't get humiliated by the people that do.
1 SIGHR 2018-09-12
So you negotiated with Reddit when you signed up? You signed a contract? Or did you just agrree to THEIR TERMS OF USAGE XD
Take this to court to learn more about humiliation.
If you have such a strong case why are you not making arrangements to sue right now?
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
You don't seem to understand very basic concepts of how contracts work. Given your appalling ignorance, I'd recommend you drop the arrogant attitude.
Not an argument.
Literal PR language. Implying that people are disagreeing with this because we don't understand what happened, not because what happened is wrong.
1 SIGHR 2018-09-12
PLEASE take this to court xD
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
1 SIGHR 2018-09-12
I am encouraging you to follow your belief. PLEASE take this to court NOW.
1 Buy_The-Ticket 2018-09-12
omg I hope they do this is fucking hilarious.
1 Sloppy1sts 2018-09-12
PROVE US WRONG. YOU HAVE THE CAPABILITY TO TAKE THIS TO COURT TO SEEK MONETARY DAMAGES. FUCKING DO IT.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
I love when you guys get worked up like this.
1 SIGHR 2018-09-12
not an argument
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Wasn't offered in response to an argument.
1 Venadore 2018-09-12
if you truly believe in your bullshit then take it to court you fucking pussy
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
You didn't even use punctuation and you're insulting me. Like, not a mistake, you just literally don't punctuate your sentences.
Capitalization? Who needs it?
Commas? Lame!
Periods? Those are for chumps.
1 pazilya 2018-09-12
not an argument
1 Venadore 2018-09-12
1-you're deflating the argument, not surprised
2-you're getting downvoted to shit while i'm not, the numbers don't lie
3-oh i'm sorry, i didn't realize this was school
4-you're still a bitch ass pussy, take it to court, cunt
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Are you old enough to be on here?
1 Venadore 2018-09-12
still dodging the point, cunt
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
How are you still here?
1 Venadore 2018-09-12
because i'm gonna run your shitty argument to the ground. plus, i'm having fun seeing you reply. please keep doing it, you're making yourself look like a complete moron
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
How are you planning to do that? The only thing you've done is say that I'm wrong because you think I'm a "pussy" and won't actually sue anyone. When you get around to your attempt, the shift key is right below enter. It will turn the little letters into big letters and make the words look pretty.
1 Venadore 2018-09-12
then don't bring up your shitty legal arguments if you won't have the balls to sue lol
1 evanc1411 2018-09-12
Woah. You are a high effort troll. I am very entertained.
1 JamesColesPardon 2018-09-12
Removed. Rules 5 and 10.
1 JamesColesPardon 2018-09-12
Rule 4.
1 JamesColesPardon 2018-09-12
Rule 4.
1 Xechwill 2018-09-12
Ouch, using his own words against him. I will donate $500 to the charity of u/theCIAsellsdrugs if he actually takes this to court and manages to win the case.
1 CelineHagbard 2018-09-12
Removed. Rule 6.
1 mileskerowhack 2018-09-12
Please take this to court, pretty please.
1 MrTingling 2018-09-12
Reddit says in their terms of service that they may ban you for literally any reason. Be it a rule violation or just by throwing darts blindly at a board of usernames. And since Reddit is not part of the government, a monopoly or a utility they may ban anyone for almost any reason.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
No, they can't.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsh_v._Alabama
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misrepresentation
1 Buy_The-Ticket 2018-09-12
Lol you are my hero!
1 AwesomesaucePhD 2018-09-12
Because he's wrong and doesn't know it?
1 Buy_The-Ticket 2018-09-12
I was being facetious.
1 MrTingling 2018-09-12
The reason the court ruled in that way was because it was an entire town open to all just like any other town. The only difference being that it was all owned by a company instead of a municipality.
Reddit is more like a fenced in factory with open gates that has a sign above them saying "anyone can enter but we can force you to leave for breaking these rules or for almost any other reason we want." Which would be their right.
Reddit did not "misrepresent" anything in your "negotiations" with them as they clearly stated in the agreement you accepted that they may ban you or your subreddit for almost any reason. Be it a rule violation or just because they feel like it.
Actually thinking Reddit has to give you a platform may be the stupidest thing I'll read on here all day.
1 Frogman417 2018-09-12
Funny how he doesn't reply to these sort of replies, instead going after the jokey replies that are making fun of him.
1 Yetimang 2018-09-12
Lol I love when idiots cite Marsh. Do you live on reddit? Is reddit the only place that you can contact others? Not even close to comparable. You'd probably know that if you went to law school, but you seem more the sovereign citizen type to me.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
The Attorney General is considering antitrust action against some of these social media companies. So, yes, I think arguing that they are an oligopoly controlling the areas where people engage in political speech would probably have some traction.
1 Yetimang 2018-09-12
Jeff Sessions is a fucking buffoon who can't even give a proper deposition. Besides, he said he's "open to a probe". That means they're maybe possibly considering an investigation to see if maybe possibly there might be something they could try to see if there is a possibility of pursuing further action.
Even if that were the case, it still doesn't meet Marsh because you can still email people, you can still send things via mail, you can start your own website, and there are even still existing websites you can go to that have not banned this kind of crazy idiocy. Just because they're smaller doesn't mean they don't exist. You're entitled to express yourself; doesn't mean you're entitled to a large audience.
The court ruled the way they did in Marsh because the town owned the very goddamn land this guy was living on. He physically had no other way to communicate his beliefs. The internet offers too many options to ever be comparable to Marsh. It's an 80 year old case, it's never going to support an entire lawsuit on its own.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
You're entitled to your opinion, but you're throwing a literal hissy fit and insulting me when my position is backed by Supreme Court case law, the current president and attorney general.
1 Yetimang 2018-09-12
You've been insulting people this entire thread. Hell, you've been insulting the very institution of the court with your rampant dipshittery. Go do your fucking 1L year at Florida Coastal and come back and tell us all if you still think you're gonna win this "literally nothing cited except Marsh case" that you won all of reddit's ad revenue from.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Not at all. I've responded to a bunch of insults from people who were not only wrong, but absolutely clueless at a basic level. If you don't want to get insulted, don't sling shit around.
Bwhahaha! I literally almost fell out of my chair I just laughed so hard at this!
Attention Americans: some random guy on the internet has besmirched the sacred honor of the Supreme Court with his reddit comment!
1 stevejablonski687 2018-09-12
This is exactly why people call you top minds
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
And this why people call you "banned from r/conspiracy"
1 JamesColesPardon 2018-09-12
Rule 10.
1 JumbledFun 2018-09-12
Teenager or sovereign citizen? Hard to tell the diff tbh since both groups have the same mental capacity
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
1 JumbledFun 2018-09-12
So which one is it?
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
1 JumbledFun 2018-09-12
Both?
1 beingaverageisnormal 2018-09-12
Says who?
What does this have to do with this:
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Centuries of well-settled law
1 beingaverageisnormal 2018-09-12
You'll need to do more than just paste a link to wikipedia explaining how Reddit misrepresented anything.
1 jdr420777 2018-09-12
Just FYI, the 1st amendment applies to speaking put against the govt., free press, etc.
No private website is required to provide "free speech"
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsh_v._Alabama
1 Frogman417 2018-09-12
Is this one situation in the 1940s your only argument?
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Legal precedent is legal precedent. You only need one.
1 lUNITl 2018-09-12
There is a lot more legal precedent for the other side. What about that?
1 Frogman417 2018-09-12
I'm pretty sure there's been many many more cases of a court ruling that a website doesn't have to provide free speech.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
That's only one of the legal issues. The more important issue is misrepresentation: telling people that you'll have a fair platform when you fully intend to control and censor the platform.
1 Frogman417 2018-09-12
But it says right on the user agreement: We reserve the right to modify, suspend, or discontinue the Services (in whole or in part) at any time, with or without notice to you.
and
Although we have no obligation to screen, edit, or monitor Your Content, we may, in our sole discretion, delete or remove Your Content at any time and for any reason, including for a violation of these Terms, a violation of our Content Policy, or if you otherwise create liability for us.
1 Tacsol5 2018-09-12
It's no different than a baker not wanting to bake a cake for a gay couple. Seems our government believes they should as a private business accommodate them. Reddit should have to accommodate speech they don't agree with as well.
1 jdr420777 2018-09-12
Lmfao that's called DISCRIMINATION. And has nothing to do with freedom of speech on privately operated websites, which is what we are talking about. What are you even talking about???
You need to go refresh yourself on the definitions of the legal words you are using because you are 100% wrong in what you are saying.
Or better yet just literally google "does private companies require free speech" and you'll see multiple articles and even case law and scholars explaining it.
But you dont want to learn any facts you would rather spew misinformation and damn right lies.
I've explained why you're wrong but it just goes put one ear and out the other. I used to think like you in regards to the 1st amendment. Turns out I was wrong just like you are.
It's actually very very specific about what is free speech. It doesnt apply to everything no matter how bad you want it to.
1 Tacsol5 2018-09-12
You're right. It is called discrimination. That's why I used that example. Social media is simply discriminating against conservatives. "We don't agree with your point of view", so we'll just ban you and not allow you to be heard. Sounds very much like they just don't want to bake a a conservative cake to me.
1 Frogman417 2018-09-12
You can legally discriminate against those with political beliefs. But not for orientation, sex, gender, race, etc.
1 Tacsol5 2018-09-12
Well I guess that baker should have just told that gay couple he doesn't bake for dems! Too bad he didn't know about that loophole.
1 Hobbes_Novakoff 2018-09-12
I mean...yeah. That’s pretty much the case. Of course if there’s any evidence showing that they actually were discriminating against gays then they’d still be up shit creek.
1 Frogman417 2018-09-12
Yep, sucks for him.
1 jdr420777 2018-09-12
Now you're making a bit more sense. And that might be true. I agree that more social media sites ban conservatives more often than liberals but that's because it's a private website and they can control who gets to say what. It sucks sometimes.
But that's not against the 1st amendment as already established by the courts.
You simply can hop over to any number of conservative blogs or websites and say your opinion as much as you want. And those sites can very well ban liberals if they choose to.
But Once again this is not violating the 1st amendment because the 1st amendment only applies to the GOVERNMENT censoring the public, the press, protests, etc.
1 Tacsol5 2018-09-12
Breaking away and going to some "safe space" is not a good solution IMO. We should be able to discuss our differences in opinions openly and without (too much!) ridicule. How else can we all come to an agreement? We should all get the chance to be heard.
1 Richard_Burt 2018-09-12
I would love for you to describe the monetary loss you would like to claim here. Breach of contract is civil not criminal, and civil generally (if not always) needs monetary value to be tried.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
It doesn't have to be monetary loss, that's for tort damages. For contracts, the damages are the benefits the other party received from the contract, in this case the profits that reddit earned from my contributions, including all of the payments from reddit gold awarded to my posts, and any ad revenue they have earned.
1 Richard_Burt 2018-09-12
That is a loss, if you pay for something and don't get its contracted value, that's the loss. Semantics aside, it's laughable to think that ad and gold purchases have lost their purchase value because a bunch of nutjobs content has now disappeared. So, thanks I needed that.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unjust_enrichment
You're still talking about tort damages.
1 Longsaddle 2018-09-12
Dude, just sue Reddit then? I'd be interested in seeing this case play out.
1 Th3_Admiral 2018-09-12
Thank you for linking that article. For those too lazy to read it (like you apparently), unjust enrichment requires the following:
I think the key problems here are the points that I marked in bold. Any enrichment that you feel was unjust must have been at your expense, and it wasn't. I can see that you've never bought gold, so you lost nothing by other people buying it. And unless you purchased any ads, you lost nothing by ad companies purchasing ad space on Reddit either. This goes into the other point about remedies.
Since you suffered no subtraction of wealth by the claimant (Reddit), you have no monetary losses and no claim for unjust enrichment. There is no money to refund to you since you have spend no money in the first place.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
You're taking "was the enrichment at the expense of the claimant" to mean "the claimant must have suffered financial loss." That's not what it means.
Imagine if an author agreed to a certain royalty payment with a publisher, and the publisher didn't pay up. The author can't show that they actually lost money, only that they weren't paid money that they were due. The publisher can't just keep the money, because that would be unjust enrichment.
Same thing if reddit promises me a forum for free political speech that they will earn money form, knowing that they actually intend to manipulate the discussion by banning certain ideas. If they take the money I earned them, and turn around and deny me a forum for free speech, they are being unjustly enriched by the content I submitted.
1 Th3_Admiral 2018-09-12
The difference between your two examples is the author still had a monetary amount that they can claim they were owed. They can show exactly what they are owed. You on the other hand are owed no money and there is no restitution to give. What would you even sue for? Do you want Reddit to refund the other people who spent money? If so, you aren't the claimant then.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
I just explained this. Unjust enrichment.
1 Th3_Admiral 2018-09-12
No, I mean what value? If you were to win the lawsuit, what would you be winning?
1 TheShrinkingGiant 2018-09-12
Unjust. Enrichment.
Geez... keep up.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
The value that reddit has collected from my use of their site. Reddit gold and ad revenue.
1 Th3_Admiral 2018-09-12
I'm assuming you are just trolling now, but if not go re-read that quoted section of the Wikipedia article again. With an unjust enrichment lawsuit you aren't entitled to any profits they made while you were wronged, you are entitled to compensation for any lost wealth you had incurred. But by all means, please go ahead and sue Reddit because they banned a couple subreddits. Someone always makes a post like this every time it happens, and no one ever goes through with the lawsuit.
1 jdr420777 2018-09-12
The 1st amendment:
Bottom line: It protects you from the government punishing or censoring or oppressing your speech. It doesn't apply to private organizations.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsh_v._Alabama
1 jdr420777 2018-09-12
The result of that case:
"Constitutional protections of free speech under First and Fourteenth Amendments still applicable within the confines of a town owned by a private entity."
Absolutely nothing to do with private COMPANIES.
So why exactly do you keep linking us to this? Did you just pick the very first court case you saw that says "1st amendment" and "private" in it? Because you are so far off it's sad, tbh.
I hope, one day, you take the time to truly research and understand the way our constitution works.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
What?
1 jdr420777 2018-09-12
Lmfao. So you literally dont even know what the result of the court case your linking is. Cause that's it up there. And it's completely irrelevant to the conversation we are having at hand.
Good talk.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
I still have no idea what you're trying to say.
1 Iorith 2018-09-12
You have no idea of a lot of things apparently.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
What's it like to waste your life insulting random strangers on the internet for absolutely no reason?
1 Iorith 2018-09-12
Pretty great actually, why do you ask?
1 jdr420777 2018-09-12
That's because you still have no idea what you're talking about.
You keep commenting with a link to a court case. That court case has absolutely nothing to do with anything we are discussing. You are wrong.
That's what I'm saying. If you still dont understand, you should consider taking a few courses on basic English and communication because I'm sorry I cant make this any clearer.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
No, I have no idea what you're talking about. You seemed to think there is a distinction between private "entity" and "COMPANY". I have no idea what you think that distinction is, but I assure you that a private "COMPANY" is a form of private "entity" and that none of this has anything to do with whether such an entity can enact viewpoint-based discrimination when they have exclusive control over the place where political speech occurs.
If you'd like to clarify what on earth you're trying to get across, it might be easier if you stop insulting me. Both because it's dickish, and because it makes you look a lot worse when someone proves you wrong if you were insulting them beforehand.
1 jdr420777 2018-09-12
Lol you're dense. Which city or town does reddit own? None.
If they did , and began to censor speech and religion IN THAT TOWN, THEN you would be correct to link that court case.
Sense we are talking about websites and private companies (not those companies towns) you are wrong. Sorry to break it to you, but you are wrongly twisting and manipulating the decision of that court case to fit your narrative.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
No, the test is:
Reddit, just like facebook, twitter, and other major social media companies, are the primary place that people engage in political discussions today.
You are wrongly twisting and manipulating every word you say because you have no clue what you're talking about and you think your raw emotion of hatred and disgust is an argument. It's not. You're wrong.
1 Mcbadguy 2018-09-12
Take it to /r/legaladvice, see what they think, lol.
1 NDubbaYa 2018-09-12
Yes please. They would just LOVE this. Make sure to bring your argument about Murphy whatever and post that like lots.
1 Loofan 2018-09-12
Almost every form of socialmedia or forums terms of service will always say they can change their polices without notification. So yeah. They can.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
No one violated their policies.
1 McFluffTheCrimeCat 2018-09-12
Except ya know doxxing @s8tan or whatever that guys twitter handle is. Mods deleted his response asking you chuckle fucks to leave him alone while leaving up articles linking his full name, town, etc.
1 Quicktrickbrickstack 2018-09-12
welcome to capitalism, u must be new here. now git out.
1 CerseiClinton 2018-09-12
Are you by any chance also suing Taylor Swift?
1 Joeakuaku 2018-09-12
no you actually kinda can
1 Yetimang 2018-09-12
Sorry, where was it you said you went to law school again?
1 mn_aspie 2018-09-12
Why is anyone arguing with this idiot? It sounds like this guy has a few classes in law, or at worst is a recent grad of law school, and has zero experience arguing anything where there is actual consequences decided by a third party.
What he fails to realize is that the surplus of people aligning against him, means his arguments are ineffective. In other words, he's so blind to reality that he thinks he's winning, while failing to do the very thing a real lawyer would need to do; persuade people to agree with him.
1 jknotts 2018-09-12
​
The projection is too real. You are a moron.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
I bet you'll have fun complaining about your ban with the rest of the topminds brigade.
1 jknotts 2018-09-12
Oh this should be good. Do tell me, please, on what grounds would Topminds be banned?
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
You're going to be banned for brigading and calling people names because you can't handle opinions different from your own. Hopefully that cancerous sub gets banned for encouraging brigading and being run by intelligence agencies.
1 jknotts 2018-09-12
The sub doesn't brigade differing opinions. Just stupid ones.
1 mn_aspie 2018-09-12
Why is anyone arguing with this idiot? It sounds like this guy has a few classes in law, or at worst is a recent grad of law school, and has zero experience arguing anything where there is actual consequences decided by a third party.
What he fails to realize is that the surplus of people aligning against him, means his arguments are ineffective. In other words, he's so blind to reality that he thinks he's winning, while failing to do the very thing a real lawyer would need to do; persuade people to agree with him.
1 Major__de_Coverly 2018-09-12
Anytime I want to know how a person with zero legal training or experience thinks about the law, I read your posts.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
And if you had any legal training or experience, you'd be able to explain what was wrong with it. Hint: nothing. You're just upset and emotional, and presented zero facts, which is why I give precisely 0 fucks about your opinion.
1 Major__de_Coverly 2018-09-12
I'm not upset. I read your stuff because it cracks me up. Its a break from actually practicing law.
I generally don't argue law with novices online because its pointless; like arguing with the homeless paranoid schizophrenic that lives in the park outside my office. I'm never going to convince him that Major League Baseball hasn't put a microchip in his brain, just like I'm never going to convince you that your legal theories are best served on the bottom of the bird cage.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Then you're a fucking terrible lawyer. Two comments and you've only been able to present a logical fallacy to support your position.
You're apparently a jag, and you're talking like you're some expert on contracts? Don't you guys handle mostly criminal and administrative law?
I've got quite a bit of experience with contracts from negotiating them in numerous business ventures over the years. Which means I know a lot more about contracts than any lawyer that isn't a contract specialist (and even then, I often know more if they don't know about the industry). But keep on believing that you're special because you spent a quarter million dollars to learn things you could have learned from someplace like nolo.
1 Major__de_Coverly 2018-09-12
You might want to take a look at who staffs the Contract and Fiscal Law Division of the U.S. Army Legal Services. It ain't nutjobs like you talking out of their ass. You know when the Army spends billions of dollars on pretty much anything? There is always a contract.
So why don't you go ahead and sue for breach of contract? Let us know how it works out. Until then, you are just an internet legal tough guy talking about all the stuff he will never do.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Because my damages are under $100 and I can't do a class action pro se.
Are you telling me that you accept the proposition "anyone who discusses legal matters on the internet without a present intent to file a lawsuit is full of shit"? I'll remind you (since you have a lot of trouble actually articulating clear, logic propositions) to discuss the actual claim I just made and try to refute it in some way, rather than invoking some logical fallacy.
1 Major__de_Coverly 2018-09-12
Sorry, I get paid to argue contract law. I don't give it away for free to amateurs.
Go find an attorney to take on the class action. When they all laugh at you during the consult, go file it yourself; it need not be as a class. Since you are the legal expert, you should be able to file as a class anyway. Didn't you read that part of Nolo?
Real practitioners love nutjob pro se filings. Its a good laugh, and your paperwork will be handed around for years as an example of the failures of the American mental health care system.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
I don't give a single fuck. I have had to work with people that went to Harvard and Yale and billed hundreds of dollars an hour that were complete morons.
You get respect from me when you make an argument that is backed up by facts. And you have done nothing but repeatedly pound your chest about how smart you are, with absolutely no reference to the facts I've given in support of what I said which include: Supreme Court precedent, the opinion of the president, and statements made by the Attorney General of the United States.
Are you fucking serious? You're claiming to be a litigator and you don't know that you can't file a class action without being a licensed attorney?
Tell me more about how stupid I am, genius.
1 Major__de_Coverly 2018-09-12
You are under the impression that I care about the respect of a random internet nutjob.
You mean lawyers can do something not covered on Nolo? I'm glad you came to that realization, at least.
You still haven't explained why you haven't filed straight pro se, if your argument is so convincing, by the way. Come on, I really want to see your batcrap crazy filings.
1 timeagain_adl 2018-09-12
To put it shortly: You're obviously immune to anything people tell you if it doesn't align with your opinion.
Thus, you should skip all this here, stop wasting your time and instead consult a lawyer. He will tell you exactly the same and probably you'll still disagree, but hey, at least this time it also cost you good money without bringing you one step further. Also be prepared to be laughed at when throwing in terms like "breach of contract" or supposed precedents like a Jehovas' Witness distributing books in 1946.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Not at all. It actually sounds like you don't know anything about the subject matter, so you jumped to the conclusion that I just must be narrow-minded about the topic.
Why would I do that? I don't have enough damages. The only way you could get a lawyer to take this is if you went for a class action.
Can you answer some questions for me? Why do all of the topinds brigade seem to think this is ridiculous, but out of dozens of you only one has even attempted to explain why? Do you not actually understand anything about the law, so you just assume it can't be true because none of your "trusted sources" have told you to think about it that way?
You literally just said that you "laugh at" Supreme Court precedent. And you think I'm the one that doesn't understand how laws work?
1 ChipChippersonAMA 2018-09-12
It seems like you may be a bit unhinged. Try relaxing by watching the funny fox tv show Family Man! Check out the sub /r/familyman!
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
It seems like I was winning the argument and you don't know anything about basic legal concepts that even non-lawyers would know, so you started rattling off tired propaganda techniques
If what I said was wrong, why don't you just explain why? Frankly, I can't recall a single time that the person who actually knew what they were talking about was the one that led off with insults.
1 ChipChippersonAMA 2018-09-12
Lmao
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Lmao
1 ChipChippersonAMA 2018-09-12
Lmao
1 throwawaypuay 2018-09-12
Soycuckery and sjwism
1 timstolt1 2018-09-12
Oy Vey! You stop that!
1 MeetMeInJersey 2018-09-12
You're delusional. It was a nightmare in there full of racists. Should've been banned sooner
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.
1 sideofbutterplease 2018-09-12
Holy shit I never knew it was Guatemalan refugees that controlled the government
1 ___jamil___ 2018-09-12
Don't you know the power that Syrian refugees have?
1 Hoojiwat 2018-09-12
"I am not allowed to call people faggots, so the gays must have taken over the world"
I understand that quoting your favourite TV show makes you feel smart, but it just shows you only know how to repeat things that make you feel smart.
That line has never been the case, as there are many powerless people and institutions that are not socially acceptable to mock or attack but who still hold no power. Single parents, orphans, people who suffer terrible illness in general, etc.
That you can't tell the difference between "socially unacceptable" and "police state" truly does encapsulate everything wrong with the T_D brand of critical thinking, if you could even call it that.
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
You are allowed to call them that so clearly the gays have not taken over the world.
1 RHBean 2018-09-12
Who can't I criticize exactly?
1 fuckeverywhoreson 2018-09-12
I always knew those sickly girl-scouts stuck in wheelchairs were up to no good...
1 FarAd3 2018-09-12
nice quote, dumbass
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
Truth need not come only from the pure, truth is truth.
1 FarAd3 2018-09-12
and truisms are truisms.
1 anonymoushero1 2018-09-12
To delude yourself entirely, simply make up cryptic nonsense in an echo chamber.
1 Dr_Cog_Science 2018-09-12
(Q)uaint.
1 MG87 2018-09-12
As said by a Neo Nazi Pedophile. Man you anti Semites really are genetically inferior aren't you?
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
You don't really put any effort into your insults do you? I'm disappointed. At the very least you could offer up some material worth re-using in the future. I can't do anything with this, it's not worth shit.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-09-12
I wasn't. I was there every day.
1 MeetMeInJersey 2018-09-12
Hopefully no one lets you out of your mother's basement then
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-09-12
You mean YOUR mother's basement. OH!
1 DeepPast 2018-09-12
Racists. Yeah okay. Luckily for you you can now just sit here and make any false claim you want about the sub because there’s no way for you to prove it. You must have a sad, sad existence.
1 MeetMeInJersey 2018-09-12
And you're a pussy
1 DeepPast 2018-09-12
I’m in Jersey if you wanna meet. I’d be happy to show you who the pussy is.
1 DeepPast 2018-09-12
No? Too much of a pussy to live up to your name?
1 MeetMeInJersey 2018-09-12
Classic basement dweller threatening people online again. No, I'm not driving down to South Jersey with you redneck wannabes. Go back to your mountain dew and pepe memes you neckbeard
1 DeepPast 2018-09-12
Not from south bud. All the more closer. Let me know.
1 badmotorvision 2018-09-12
Says the premature ejaculating porn commenter.
1 FUCK_SNITCHES_ 2018-09-12
You really think "racism" was the issue there? Not a bunch of boomers crazily following some guy (I'd bet money it's Mossad) on fucking 8chan
1 Dwighty1 2018-09-12
The thing all of you are missing is that reddit is a private company that gets to decide what they want to publish on their website.
Free speech doesn't mean you can send an article to a newspaper and force them to publish it.
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
We are aware that they have the legal right to do so. This however is indicative of a issue that is going to become more noticeable and important in the future; namely that the "public commons" which are now social media platforms are leading to a world where the body politics is controlled and manipulated by private parties.
1 exoticstructures 2018-09-12
When you go down to the community park do you run around ranting like crazy or realize you're in a public space and act appropriately?? In general, I'd say the vast majority of people adhere to the latter. Failing that--what you're essentially describing would amount to an opening in the 'market' which I'm sure some enterprising people would seek to fill.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-09-12
Then businesses should be allowed to deny cakes to gay couples, is that it?
1 Dwighty1 2018-09-12
Inept analogy.
What you are talking about is discrimination based on sex.
A more apt analogy would be a business' right to deny said gay couple to put out gay porn magazines in their bakery and call for hanging of anti-gay politicians on their wall outside.
Imagine if said gay couple cried "muh free speech" when the business said they couldn't do that.
1 LunaticOnDaGrass 2018-09-12
Is this the same bakery turning a blind eye to couples who want to put out extreme hardcore pornagraphy and videos by violent religious extremists who are also selling drugs on the street corner nearest that same bakery? Not to mention the soft-pedo imagery targeted towards children of customers of that bakery?
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-09-12
Inept analogy.
1 LoveYacht 2018-09-12
"Narrative" sounds appropriate for the veracity of Q's claims
https://www.reddit.com/r/Qult_Headquarters/comments/93v1ui/a_noncomprehensive_timeline_of_qs_failed/?utm_source=reddit-android
1 AutoModerator 2018-09-12
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 houghjh0 2018-09-12
Hey man thank you for posting this, I’m sorry for sounding like an idiot here, but could you maybe enlighten me on what kind of stuff was discussed on GA. I haven’t ever seen it but I am very curious as to what is going down right now
1 delelles 2018-09-12
All the people from even slightly controversial subs need to know to go to Voat immediately after the sub is inevitably banned.
The mods of banned subs have done a great disservice to their members by not having a back-up plan in place.
1 beardslap 2018-09-12
Or better yet, go before it’s banned.
1 delelles 2018-09-12
I have Voat opened in a tab right next to Reddit. No reason not to use both platforms.
1 beardslap 2018-09-12
Well, apart from voat being a cesspit of wackos, morons and paedophiles. But if you’ve found your people, then you do you.
1 DJBlu-Ray 2018-09-12
Hey man, can you give me the link that has all of the Q posts archived?
Now I'm curious to dig in a little deeper into it. I wanna see what is ruffling so many feathers.
​
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
https://qmap.pub/
I would also suggest looking up Praying Medic on YouTube. Might want to do that quickly, who knows how long his videos will be up.
1 CommaHorror 2018-09-12
If anything this just gives more credibility to Q anon.
These people are, stupid.
1 KING_OF_THE_SHILLZ 2018-09-12
I think they were banned because they were inciting violence toward politicians and people they disagreed with politically.
honestly i saw it coming for a while with that sub. so many sitewide rule violations there, i knew it was only a matter of time.
1 PoopSwatches 2018-09-12
Not at all sir.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Lol, no. People were immediately banned for that. Not 100% certain you're doing damage control, but it certainly appears that way.
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
Why not use your real account?
1 duplexnovella 2018-09-12
Are people who call for Trump to be harmed ever banned? Just curious...
1 ___jamil___ 2018-09-12
Yep, all the time. The difference is that mods don't call for Trump to be banned.
1 sk_y 2018-09-12
I’ve seen ridiculous callings for violence on repubs & trump everywhere on here (including mods). Even fucking r/art. This is getting out of hand.
1 ___jamil___ 2018-09-12
cool story. link to one.
1 sk_y 2018-09-12
a large portion of the 2k comments on this post [nsfw]
1 AutoModerator 2018-09-12
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 ___jamil___ 2018-09-12
please link to one. I read through about 2-3 pages worth of comments and didn't see any calls for violence.
1 sk_y 2018-09-12
I’m not gonna fucking spoon feed you. If you’ve spent more than a minimal amount of time on this website, you’ve seen it first hand.
1 ___jamil___ 2018-09-12
right, so you don't have any. imagine my surprise that you are talking out of your ass.
1 Dwighty1 2018-09-12
So no proof then?
A claim without proof can be dismissed without proof.
1 ___jamil___ 2018-09-12
you are the one who made the claim, burden of proof is on you duder.
1 Dwighty1 2018-09-12
I think you mix up the user names.
1 ___jamil___ 2018-09-12
You are right. Doesn't matter, the point is still correct, regardless of who asks it.
1 awol5943 2018-09-12
Yeah I got to agree with him. I had not seen any post inciting violence. a huge majority would say “got what he/she deserved” but never anything about inciting the violence.
There were calls for GB for certain people, and there was a lively discussion about whether a Military Tribunal could be used to find certain individuals guilty of treason (spawn by the questioning of Kavanaugh during the hearings).
Everything was speculation and candid conversation about how The Powers that Be have completely fucked the American public, and why certain things did not add up.
A lot of it was dislike towards the MSM and their ineptitude to presents facts, unbiased and true, while steadily and in your face pushing a leftist agenda.
I personally thought everyone should’ve stuck with the decoding of the Q drops and kept the emotion of hate/dislike out of there. And this is why.
I even got “torn” into by a q supporter simply because I wanted to remind everyone that McCain had a family and was a human being, so maybe try not to continue slandering his name. He died, he lost his right to a trial, therefore we lost our right to judge him (just my opinion), even if it comes out later that he was killed, or he was involved in the heinous things people accuse him of, he definitely paid the ultimate price, stop getting hung up on that shit, move on.
1 firewaterdirt 2018-09-12
Like always... and admins never give proof. Like always.
1 Krabban 2018-09-12
Q-followers want proof now, huh?
1 firewaterdirt 2018-09-12
Yepp
1 ___jamil___ 2018-09-12
the irony is astounding
1 FlooferzMcPooferz 2018-09-12
Do you understand irony
1 Therealcodyg 2018-09-12
Do as they say, not as they do.
1 problemforfutureme 2018-09-12
They never did this.
No there weren't.
No you didn't.
It was a popcorn sub, not a pitchfork sub. Anyone that doesn't believe this likely never followed it. There are at least a dozen subs on both sides of the reddit-Hate-Grand-Canyon that grossly, violently break such rules hourly that have never faced consequences for marginal posters in their subs. Consider why. No one genuinely interested in that sub incited any violence. This shutdown happened because it was a threat to someone. Who? If someone were allegedly threatened by the content of the sub, why wouldn't ya just sign up a bunch of accounts and then suddenly break a bunch of rules to get it shut down?
1 KING_OF_THE_SHILLZ 2018-09-12
Umm yes they did? I don't know what else to tell you if you're going to just completely deny reality.
Umm yes there were? I saw daily calls there for military tribunals and for Hillary and "Hussein' to be publicly hanged.
For Christ's sake they were fully convinced that John McCain was actually executed for his war crimes, and they were giddy about it.
Yes I did, and so did they. I saw several posts on that sub of people saying that they knew they were going to get banned eventually.
1 problemforfutureme 2018-09-12
Spare me. If I go post on a sub of your choice saying things that violate a bunch of the site's rules does that make the sub about those things I said?
1 ExpensiveBurn 2018-09-12
If it's massively upvoted by the community, attracts similarly minded people, and isn't dealt with by the mods, then... uh... yea, kinda?
Like, sure, pop in at r/mma and start sharing some child porn. If the community welcomes it, contributes to it, and the mods refuse to remove it, I'm pretty sure that'll implicate the shit out of r/mma.
1 Spartan1117 2018-09-12
If its constantly talked about and upvoted then yes it would.
1 MatrixDream 2018-09-12
Clearly targeted, just use some common sense.
1 FlooferzMcPooferz 2018-09-12
Whats your definition of common sense?
1 bardwick 2018-09-12
​
Total bullshit. Never happened.
​
You're thinking of /r/politics where it happens on every article.
1 ___jamil___ 2018-09-12
link to one please.
1 nisaaru 2018-09-12
I can still remember rabid US pundits on MSM asking for Assange to get assassinated. All the war mongering and 1M kids were worth it noise didn't bother them either.
1 cornman34 2018-09-12
Yeah but those pundits arent bound to the rules of reddit, m8 :)
1 Covefe_Anon 2018-09-12
“I think they were banned because they were inciting violence toward politicians and people they disagreed with politically.” -like Maxine Waters?
“Constant calls for civil war” -Maxine Waters
“Public execution” -Madonna
I think your projecting😂
1 cornman34 2018-09-12
So should we ban Maxine Waters and Madonna from reddit? Because last time I checked they didn't say that on reddit.
1 tmntnut 2018-09-12
I mean, I don't buy into the whole Qanon thing but I went there mainly out of morbid curiosity but never saw anything worse than what is posted even in the main political subs directed at Trump, the whole thing stinks and a lot of the responses in here stink as well, if they're really banning subs for these reasons then they might as well nuke the whole god damn site because it's fucking everywhere. Shit like Incels I can understand to a degree but even then they're all just living out their sick little fantasies in their echo chamber, unless they're actually hurting or intending to hurt someone I don't understand the point of censorship, I doubt that many people even knew what thegreatawakening was.
1 AFuckingShark 2018-09-12
Lol if admins cared to ban subs for this they'd have banned 20 resist subs a day by now since 2017
1 Ockwords 2018-09-12
You're free to collect evidence of longtime users of those subs violating the same rules and report it to the admins.
We both know you won't though.
1 AFuckingShark 2018-09-12
You're right I have things to do
1 tamrix 2018-09-12
There was some violent reactions towards pedophiles.
It was never political and just because a pedo is a politician doesn't mean they should get away with it.
1 KING_OF_THE_SHILLZ 2018-09-12
hillary clinton, barack obama, james comey, etc. are not pedophiles lol
1 acidbath77 2018-09-12
Okay buddy sure
1 OptimystiQal 2018-09-12
That’s not true at all. You are making up lies and you know it
1 KING_OF_THE_SHILLZ 2018-09-12
https://archive.is/OlQYB
https://archive.is/2dbbY
https://archive.is/QraZZ
https://archive.is/g7ap2
https://archive.is/uYuDp
https://archive.is/HM9P5
https://archive.is/w3OEN
https://archive.is/mkttv
https://archive.is/y88Gb
https://archive.is/YMs5x
https://archive.is/opNuT
https://archive.is/0RM6V
https://archive.is/P8rVD
1 fuckeverywhoreson 2018-09-12
Gotta love that rapper's logic.
​
1 Stitchface 2018-09-12
Yeah I wouldn't be too worried about that.
1 DeepPast 2018-09-12
Yeah you weren’t sent here to push a certain narrative and have all your sickly buddies upvote you.
If Q is a LARP, why do you follow enough to know whether it’s correct or not? Why care enough to try and shut something down you think is all make believe.
“It was only a matter of time before they got violent.” Save it. The sub was filled with some pretty sound minded people who only want freedom of speech, ideas and to expose corruption and evil. Anyone who opposes that clearly has something to lose with the success of Q.
No matter how many upvotes you and all your buddies rack up, not a single imaginary internet point will take away 50,000 + sealed indictments waiting to be unsealed.
1 Corsham 2018-09-12
Almost forgot where I was and I was going to reply to you like your not insane
1 secretevidence 2018-09-12
I payed attention for the same reason I have problems looking away from monkeys throwing shit at the zoo. It's fascinating to me watching people so damned primitive hang on the words of an anonymous source who's been wrong just over and over and over again.
Still waiting for Hillary's arrest. Feel like I'll NEVER stop waiting because it was a stupid fucking larp, and literally every person who believed it should probabky turn themselves in to the nearest mental hospital for rehabilitation.
1 jerkwad2000 2018-09-12
It's hilarious that anyone takes it seriously. You need help if you aren't just taking the piss.
1 r4tzt4r 2018-09-12
You need mental help, friendo.
1 DeepPast 2018-09-12
Great argument! Really sound logic. Piss off.
1 r4tzt4r 2018-09-12
Sad thing is I'm not even trying to troll you or something, stop wasting your time defending an imaginary internet conspiracy, look for help if you just can't, live a happy life. Nobody is against you. You are just wasting time (like I am right now, probably), and that is the most valuable thing you have.
1 CamelCaser 2018-09-12
This is their tactic. They are all bots you are arguing with. No real person down voted you. You are spot on patriot
1 Minnehaha17 2018-09-12
Bet.
1 MeetMeInJersey 2018-09-12
God, they're all so dumb
1 exoticstructures 2018-09-12
What was donnie doing when he was giving all that money to Bill and Hillary for years??
1 Exceon 2018-09-12
...sending hundreds of death threats to “targets”, don’t forget
1 ThatOneGuy4321 2018-09-12
“They banned my incoherent echo chamber!
IT MUST MEAN I’M RIGHT!”
1 CommaHorror 2018-09-12
Perhaps. I still enjoy listening, to all possible sides of an argument.
1 hipery2 2018-09-12
If I am listening to an argument to determine which is better, sea salt or pink salt, then I want to listen to people who actually know what they are taking about. I don't want to listen to a 3 year old talk about their trip to beach. The great awakening was the 3 year old.
1 ThatOneGuy4321 2018-09-12
Why internalize arguments made by the ignorant and/or delusional, though?
Some “sides” of the argument serve no purpose except to poison the barrel of public discourse. The more people listen, regardless of which conclusion they come to, the more political extremists accomplish their goal of polarizing the country.
1 ModeratorsAreDouches 2018-09-12
If the conspiracy is so worthless that it has no legs to stand on, why bother banning it? Why ot just let it deflate on its own? Why the suppression? Banned because of violent threats? What about threats going on in other subs? Do they collapse /r/books if someone threatens to kill another user? Me thinks not.
1 amlecciones 2018-09-12
probability of the likelihood of the types of entities being banned throughout social media. doesn't raise any flags vis-a-vis a supposedly free speech society under democracy? #blackswan
1 amlecciones 2018-09-12
probability of the likelihood of the types of entities being banned throughout social media. doesn't raise any flags vis-a-vis a supposedly free speech society under democracy? .blackswan.
1 fuckingredditpr0n 2018-09-12
Explain.
1 a_full_empty 2018-09-12
i mean the guy got caught photoshopping a picture of airforce one to use as evidence that he is really in the president's inner circle, but yeah sure this shit show getting banned totally gives him tons of credibility.
1 Dave-C 2018-09-12
Same group that support "Q anon" are the some ones confused by journalists using "sources."
1 Pete_Castiglione_ 2018-09-12
Quick somebody make r/greatawakeningll
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
That is a great way to get your account banned as well.
1 IamDonLyme 2018-09-12
Why do people seriously give a care about internet points? Here's alternative: reddit.com//r/The_GreatAwakening
1 sadmep 2018-09-12
Banned as well, try without the underscore, that hasn't been banned yet, which really just seems sloppy.
1 AssuredlyAThrowAway 2018-09-12
Please do not advocate ban evasion with regards admin sanctioned subreddits; such behavior could put both your account, and this subreddit, in jeopardy. Thank you for your understanding.
1 Pete_Castiglione_ 2018-09-12
Making a sub?
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
ban evasion
1 HalfwayIllumined 2018-09-12
Unbelievable but also believable.
1 ShaneE11183386 2018-09-12
Simple but well said haha
1 HalfwayIllumined 2018-09-12
Reddit is dead. Soon all mediums will be dead but truth is always truth.
1 ShaneE11183386 2018-09-12
Yep. I hope one day my grandchildren will read the truth in the history books written by good guys and not by a national criminal conglomerate
1 HalfwayIllumined 2018-09-12
One can hope we overcome the darkness. Reading about what's happening in the EU is scary too. Things always move east to west. Just like the sun. Keep your guns America and stay dangerous and free. Free in all forms.
1 ShaneE11183386 2018-09-12
Seems like we are headed the EU way. You stay good too. Wherever you are
1 HalfwayIllumined 2018-09-12
Ditto fellow patriot.
1 timstolt1 2018-09-12
Ditto too, and Godspeed. The 2nd protects the first. The first has been under attack ever since a particular group has bought out most mass communications (including this site). Speech control is thought control. More important than ever to utilize your right to free speech. You don't use it, you lose it.
1 HalfwayIllumined 2018-09-12
Absolutely, positively and right on.
1 JulianAsausage 2018-09-12
What great awakening posts would you show your grand kids?
1 Quriosity4Change 2018-09-12
I have allot of them archived but if we bring them here this one is at risk for being taken down. We have the info we need now we vote for change and support those who have been trying to change it.
1 ShaneE11183386 2018-09-12
I said history books... clearly your mind went elsewhere which is typical of simple minded people
1 JulianAsausage 2018-09-12
My mind still can't believe you will reproduce so this is all academic really.
1 HalfwayIllumined 2018-09-12
History will be rewritten if we keep going down this path.
1 JulianAsausage 2018-09-12
History will be written regardless.
1 HalfwayIllumined 2018-09-12
As long as it's the truth it's fine.
1 ShaneE11183386 2018-09-12
:)
Sad you never had the chance to do that in your miserable and albeit lonely life
1 JulianAsausage 2018-09-12
Don't be sad 😔
1 ShaneE11183386 2018-09-12
Haha I'll try not to be
1 baphomet_labs 2018-09-12
Your mother reproduced so nothing surprises me.
1 JulianAsausage 2018-09-12
Wasn't really worth logging in for that one.
1 blaaaahhhhh 2018-09-12
Kinda missing the bigger picture there
1 RocketSurgeon22 2018-09-12
I would let them read r politics and Russianlago and teach them about propoganda and how people get sucked into stupid lies like Russian Collusion.
1 JulianAsausage 2018-09-12
I asked about great awakening.
1 RocketSurgeon22 2018-09-12
You asked someone else and I responded to your question on what I would share with my grandchildren.
1 JulianAsausage 2018-09-12
My question was quite specific.
1 woodmoon 2018-09-12
r politics was the first sub I ever realized was compromised, because it was so blatantly obvious. Is this not common knowledge?
1 RocketSurgeon22 2018-09-12
Not for someone new or young.
1 DJBlu-Ray 2018-09-12
For sure man. We really gotta band together and get some alternative options up and running because the major outlets are all going down the shitter.
Seems like the elites think they can just put the genie back in the bottle and that the new movement going on will inevitably fizzle out.
1 HalfwayIllumined 2018-09-12
There are alternatives like voat and 4chan but the format and the lingo used on those boards is meant to keep "normies" out. So something like reddit without a downvote/upvote system is what we need.
1 UncleSnake3301 2018-09-12
Soon we will have our group-think acceptable topic of discussion - anything else will be immediately banned and subject to prosecution. Look at what is happening to the internet in Europe. We are not far behind them with stunts like this. Free speech online is dying.
1 FreonPurple 2018-09-12
Jews, man.
1 HalfwayIllumined 2018-09-12
Any religious body that says that non-believers are cattle, goy, sheep, infadels etc. Is a danger and a cancer to our human race and needs to be disbanded. Won't happen until all of the people wake up and take serious action.
1 FreonPurple 2018-09-12
Agreed. All this censorship shows that they are clearly getting desperate and abusing their control at this point. This is good for us, people are waking up.
1 HalfwayIllumined 2018-09-12
If they just stopped trying to control it all it would end up better for them. So a part of me loves the fact that they have no clue what they're doing in this information war. Gives me hope. A new hope.
1 FreonPurple 2018-09-12
Yup. The phenomenon of the internet really threw them for a loop. Just look at how overwhelmingly blind previous generations were. The internet has been their biggest threat, and thank God we have it.
1 HalfwayIllumined 2018-09-12
Absolutely.. Meme magick warfare is real and I believe the people will win. We are fighting in WW3 right now.
1 DJBlu-Ray 2018-09-12
Don't be so optimistic. The average person nowadays is incredibly intellectually lazy. If good information isn't readily available and easily accessible, there's a good chance that all these truth awakenings taking place will fizzle out.
1 HalfwayIllumined 2018-09-12
Well spread the information then. Don't be lazy and use this tool for good.
1 DJBlu-Ray 2018-09-12
Oh man, I always do. It's the other folks I worry about.
1 hsbunny 2018-09-12
that sounds like censorship
1 HalfwayIllumined 2018-09-12
I have no quarrels with anyone over what they believe until their beliefs infringe upon my life. Religious people and get into power and make laws to govern what I should do with my possesions, mind, body and spirit. Also anyone with an agenda to do the same thing. So fuck them. Fuck them good.
1 procgen 2018-09-12
Do you have any Jewish friends?
1 Speerchucker 2018-09-12
Plus when you consider the violence you hear and see is coming from the left, which makes this more unbelieveable, and just another one of their projection stradegies. NWO must be really scared.
1 HalfwayIllumined 2018-09-12
They have no clue what they're doing.
1 Diabolus-Ex-Machina 2018-09-12
speerchucker has the nerve to say others are violent while he has a racist name.
1 nolivesmatterCthulhu 2018-09-12
words aren't violence
1 Diabolus-Ex-Machina 2018-09-12
Tell that to "speerchucker"
1 nolivesmatterCthulhu 2018-09-12
I don't think they are the one that is confused by my statement you claim a racist name is violent I claim words aren't violence, change my mind.
1 Diabolus-Ex-Machina 2018-09-12
Bro you can't even read. I didn't say his racism is violent. I just said he has a racist name while claiming others are violent.
No one can change your mind. You have your head up your ass.
1 Speerchucker 2018-09-12
If you could spell you would know the name is not racist.
1 Diabolus-Ex-Machina 2018-09-12
What's the matter? Spearchucker was taken when you first typed that in?
1 Adarcer 2018-09-12
O.o how is the word spear racist ? look into all the cultures of the world that had spears ... I think you will be surprised that your wrong on this.
1 Diabolus-Ex-Machina 2018-09-12
You'd be surprised on just how ignorant you are about this. That phrase has been around. Just type the word into Google ffs
1 Adarcer 2018-09-12
I don't use google ... this ? https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/speer https://www.speer-ammo.com/en/bullets/rifle-bullets https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speer
1 Diabolus-Ex-Machina 2018-09-12
Lol whatever you gotta do to troll
1 Circus_Phreak 2018-09-12
What violence would this be?
1 HalfwayIllumined 2018-09-12
They're changing the subject. Pay no mind.
1 Kittens_n_stuff 2018-09-12
Antifa, Punch a Nazi, attack people wearing trump hats, rise up and remove trump from the White House if they can’t find legal means. There’s a few and I’m not even following this stuff. I do however follow right wing sites and everyone urges each other not to attend right wing rallies specifically to avoid violence
1 Circus_Phreak 2018-09-12
You do know that the amount of violence committed by antifa is blown way out of proportion by the media, right?
And that right wing violence happens far more often than left wing violence? Like, take Charlottesville - the right wing protesters there actually killed one of the left wing counter-protesters. Or how mass shooters are much more likely to be those with right-leaning views than left-leaning views.
Since you seem to be someone who likes learning information, here's a video to watch about what anti-fascist action usually actually involves, so you can get a better idea of what antifa really get up to most of the time: https://youtu.be/bgwS_FMZ3nQ
1 Adarcer 2018-09-12
So your saying they don't act like facists "def:a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition" ... screaming at people who do not agree with them ? calling people "Nazi" "Straight White Male" , etc , etc
1 Circus_Phreak 2018-09-12
I mean... 'Nazi' is an appropriate thing to call white supremicists (sorry, 'identitarians') who want to advance their cause by taking control of governmental and societal institutions.
And antifa are Anti Fascists they don't want to create a centralised, autocratic government, headed by a dictototorial leader, and they're not for severe economic and social regimentation. They work explicitly to prevent fascism from taking root. You may not agree with their methods (though I suggest you watch the video I linked above to get a better idea of what most of their actual methods entail), but to call antifa fascists is to (at best) be either ignorant of the truth, or disengenuous about reality.
1 DHAYNES07 2018-09-12
The thing I never got with Antifa is that if they are against fascists... Great thats a good thing... But how come they were labelled as a terrorist organisation... Why do they cover their faces if they have nothing to hide?
1 Circus_Phreak 2018-09-12
They have been labled as terrorists largely by people with political leanings that support fascism and authoritarianism.
They cover their faces to hide their identities from fascists who would want to hurt (and kill) themselves and their families.
1 DHAYNES07 2018-09-12
The problem with Antifa is, they go to events ready to brawl, masked up and ready to start violance. They destroy public and private property, as well as beat people up even if they are just civilians, yet if they truly believe in anti fascism they shouldn't hide their faces.
That is why they are classified as a domestic terror organisation, even Nancy Pelosi, minority leader of the Democrats condemned them.
Most importantly, those on the right side of politics who are causing violance, they should be arrested and suffer the consequences of the law as well. There was so many posts and comments on r/TheGreatAwakening board that spoke of not going down the violant path, and condemning and down voting violant Inflaming posts. I really doubt the reasons given for the banning of that sub. When you see the Q followers at trumps rally, there not wearing masks, they are holding cardboard signs.
The fact they kept The Donald but got rid of TGA.... The Donald is a much more wild and aggressive subreddit than TGA ever was.
1 Adarcer 2018-09-12
History repeats itself ... But those that know history will not let it happen again https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antifaschistische_Aktion they even use the same name ! Do something for me get three history books one printed nowadays one 20 years ago and one 30 compare...
1 The_Poop 2018-09-12
Actually I don't think it is very appropriate to call white supremacists 'nazis' , even if they intend to gain political power/government control.
Defining aspects of nazi ideology:
-fascism: state -supremacists , authoritarianism for the sake of authoritarianism.
-national socialism: the people of the nation (motherland/fatherland/homeland) are to be prioritized, the means of production controlled by the state 'for the benefit of the German people'
-Germanic supremacy: 'Aryan' being the ideal, purest German. Only about race insofar as the people of Germany had been relatively homogeneous traditionally, facilitating the idealization of 'pure German' by Hitler (not even German like wtf my dude).
-scapegoating of Jews, etc; due mostly to personal prejudice by Adolf Hitler against certain groups (Jews, gypsies, Romanians, etc basically any Jew-ISH groups) the devastation of postwar Germany and the suffering of her people were blamed (apparently somewhat convincingly) on the Jews.
So question is, when is the term nazi appropriate ?
Should it be used to describe authoritarians (people who think the government should violate liberty of others in favor of their own ideals) ? If so, it would seem more descriptive of more left wing groups than right wing groups... at least at present.
Should it be used to describe actual fascists (people who believe the state should be supreme, the state is always good and anything the state does is therefore good)? If so, good luck finding many of those people these days.
Should it be used to describe white supremacists (general 'whiteness' / broadly European genetics are considered supreme) ? If so, isn't that a bit far-reaching? Nazis were not European-supremacists, they were german - supremacists, hence the whole WW2 thing... the involvement of race was due to the fact that 'German' genetics could be pretty tightly narrowed down. There were some black people in Germany, and while not treated wonderfully, they were not among those carted off and slaughtered, which should clarify the actual sentiments involved.
Should it be used to describe ethno-nationalists? (People who believe that while not necessarily supreme vs others, races/ethnicities ought to be separated into their own nation-states for the best results)
White nationalists? (Believe there should be a homogenous state for white people, as there are such states for Asians, Africans, etc)
How about just plain old nationalists? (Believe their nation is great/best; patriots. Differs from 'supremacy' in that supremacy is an objective characterization (my '____' is the best and everyone must recognize this) whereas nationalism is subjective (I believe my nation is best, but I understand that you probably think yours is best)
Socialists? Should they be called nazis ?The nazis were socialists, which is why they were at such odds with the communists (Hitler and Stalin hated each other's guts). Nothing stirs up vitriol like someone doing your thing in a way that you disapprove of. State("public/social") control of means of production? Check. Socialism. I mean, socialism is inherently authoritarian. Is that enough?
Basically: should we use 'nazi' as a vague generalization if any of the above apply? That would make antifa, the alt-right, the proud boys, democratic socialists, etc all 'nazis' . Or should we use it in reference to a specific combination of characteristics (which I have outlined) ? If so, it is only applicable to a tiny subset of people, if any .
Neo-nazi is slightly more flexible but even that is rather specific and doesn't fit the nazi label itself.
1 ShitOfPeace 2018-09-12
Perhaps you should look up Tim Pool and his videos. He actually goes to these protests and he will tell you this is blatantly false. Or maybe look up Crowder’s videos on the subject that involved multiple arrests.
1 DJBlu-Ray 2018-09-12
Yeah, the left is actually going out and inciting REAL violence yet all these freedom and truth movements are being wiped out because there's a theoretical chance that they might result in violence... WTF?! Absolute horseshit.
The globalists and the elites no that they can't go on with their shenanigans if everyone is awake, so they're desperately trying to figure out how to rig the game in their favor again by trying to put the genie back in the bottle.
Pretty crazy times we're living in. It's up to all of us to fight this!
1 showmeurboobsplznthx 2018-09-12
Maybe they have the impeachment ready and don't want areas for people to organize and defy the impeachment?
1 Love_And_Light33 2018-09-12
Half the story, other half is FISA declass is about to drop
1 showmeurboobsplznthx 2018-09-12
Do you have more details on this?
1 SIGHR 2018-09-12
bro when the IG report comes out this whole thing is going to blow...wait. I mean when the 40k sealed indictments are unsealed at the end of 2017...wait.
1 Love_And_Light33 2018-09-12
OK look I'm not a Qultist I think it is a fascist coup but ive put hundreds of hours of research into it and there is 0 doubt Q is real.
1 qoa 2018-09-12
This is what is happening. They are hoping to silence as much as they can.
1 God_Emperor_of_Dune 2018-09-12
Consider using uncensorable social media platforms like memo.cash and matter.cash. These can act as alternatives to Twitter and Reddit.
1 yourenotserious 2018-09-12
So school shooting incels still have a safe space/echo chamber? That's a shame.
1 Disgruntledfamilyguy 2018-09-12
Can someone TL;DR reason for the ban?
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
Just happened, nobody knows for sure. I have been half expecting this for quite some time. The ban page says that it is for violating TOS and doxing, I hadn't seen that personally.
1 lottapoppa 2018-09-12
To hide news.
They arrested someone from the DOD for child porn yesterday, so release came out today
1 sadmep 2018-09-12
As of this posting, the following reasons are listen for the following subs:
I find it interesting the reasons aren't the same for all three.
1 RealLifePolygamist 2018-09-12
The harassing might refer to the s8n stuff.
1 Supersamtheredditman 2018-09-12
If so it just goes to show how slow the admins are haha
1 jdotg 2018-09-12
Interesting..when is top minds of reddit being banned?
1 frisbee_coach 2018-09-12
They'd have to fire the admins who mod that sub with alt's first.
1 jdotg 2018-09-12
Its great to see them monetize reddit then watch it slowly implode into nothing.
The paid advertising masqueraded around as organic users has seen my site usage curtailed massively
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Good :-)
1 ka1n77 2018-09-12
Lol.
1 historyeraser4sale 2018-09-12
you have very initmate knowledge of admin tricks
1 ___jamil___ 2018-09-12
what violence has that sub incited?
1 jdotg 2018-09-12
Puhlease dude, fucking save the bs. Sitewide rules are broken by that sub, when they actively promote and participate in brigades.
So why is a hate sub given a pass? Is it because they target right leaning individual? I think so, how about you?
1 ___jamil___ 2018-09-12
I think it's hilarious how people on the right constantly claims to be the victim when people on the right are clearly the bad actors.
Mods there don't promote brigading, maybe conservatives should learn from them?
1 jdotg 2018-09-12
I never claimed be on the right. Nice try?
The whole sub is promoting brigading. Being this wilfully ignorant when voting would explain your affinity for democrats. Lmfao
1 ___jamil___ 2018-09-12
Nope. In fact, it actively discourages brigading, it's there to laugh at morons who post idiotic stuff. ...like cringe. Should that be banned too?
Being able to see nuance isn't being ignorant. Being unable to see nuance explains why someone as dense as you has such an affinity for republicans.
1 seeking101 2018-09-12
if your sub revolves around direct linking to comment its a brigade sub
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Lol you're really shitty at pretending to not be a republican
1 cstrafe 2018-09-12
/r/greatawakening did not brigade, did not dox, and did not call for violence. Any posts promoting that type of stuff were swiftly removed by mods.
On the other hand, tmor is a sub that is completely dedicated to brigading and trolling. That's the entire purpose.
James Hodgkinson
1 No_More_Candy 2018-09-12
Yeah, I guess it's just a coincidence that several users of the sub were involved in terrorist attacks over the last year.
1 whacko_jacko 2018-09-12
Now you're just spewing shit to see what sticks.
1 No_More_Candy 2018-09-12
The Hoover dam terrorist was a Qultist. So was the guy who stormed the cement factory in Tuscon. If you want to keep your eyes closed, that's up to you.
1 whacko_jacko 2018-09-12
What makes you think they were users of the subreddit though?
1 Diabolus-Ex-Machina 2018-09-12
NOWS the time to be skeptical lol
1 roopdadoop 2018-09-12
Did you read the article at all? It literally says why they made the connection.
1 whacko_jacko 2018-09-12
There's not a single reference to reddit or /r/greatawakening in that article.
So, if a Christian bombs an abortion clinic, that means we should ban /r/Christianity? I don't follow your logic.
1 No_More_Candy 2018-09-12
Q himself is a user of the subreddit, but sure, I guess besides the man himself it's barely related.
1 whacko_jacko 2018-09-12
Haha wtf. This is some dumb shit.
A square is a rectangle but a rectangle is not necessarily a square.
A /r/GreatAwakening user is a Q follower, but a Q follower is not necessarily an /r/GreatAwakening user.
Do I really have to explain this?
If a Christian bombs an abortion clinic, do we ban /r/Christianity?
1 FinancialMacaron 2018-09-12
Give me strong evidence and proof, and if you don't it's bullshit
1 cstrafe 2018-09-12
Name one.
1 No_More_Candy 2018-09-12
Literally two home grown US terrorists have proven links to Qanon.
1 cstrafe 2018-09-12
Name one attack and the username who committed a terror attack.
1 ___jamil___ 2018-09-12
bullshit
1 cstrafe 2018-09-12
How many politicians did they shoot this year?
1 ___jamil___ 2018-09-12
dumb arbitrary metric is dumb
1 cstrafe 2018-09-12
Of course you'd say that. You blamed the right for violence without considering how violent the left has been recently. For more, do a search on anything ANTIFA related.
Incredibly disappointing exchange to have on this sub.
1 ___jamil___ 2018-09-12
I did a search on ANTIFA violence. There was some people getting beat up n shit. I don't approve of them doing that.
Then I did a search on right-wing/conservative violence. Many articles on people getting killed by conservatives.
Why do you provide cover for murderers by attempting to point attention to other bad actors?
1 cstrafe 2018-09-12
Never attempted to cover for anyone. You were the one who singled out the right and said they should take some lessons from the left.
What exactly would that be? Shutting down opposition speech on social media? Creating entire subreddits (TMOR) whose sole purpose is to make fun of opposing view points and troll those people? Or, to shoot your political opponents while they play baseball?
TD and GA had very strict content policies due to the fact that they are conservative/anti-establishment subs on reddit, which is now either controlled or manipulated by the establishment left wing. TD is not even allowed to mention the politics sub; they were specifically instructed not to do it. Whenever screencaps are posted, the names are blurred out. GA was relatively the same.
Meanwhile, I've been harassed multiple times by TMOR, whether it be through PMs or by them directly linking to posts I've made on another sub.
I have to assume that you are just trolling at this point.
You
1 ___jamil___ 2018-09-12
None of that is true. We were discussing TMOR and I said how conservative subreddit mods perhaps should take a lesson or two from how they manage their subreddit. Conservative subreddits cry censorship, but they only get shut down after breaking rule after rule. You then made the non-sequitor of bringing up a mentally ill person who shot at politicians. You made the big leap to murderers.
Don't break the rules dude. Ain't hard.
You mean like KotakuInAction, Cringe, CringeAnarchy, The_Donald, etc.. etc..
Crying more crocodile tears won't convince me of shit.
And one got banned while the other didn't. Maybe you should think about what GA was doing wrong....
Bullshit. Reddit is run by right wing libertarians. Fucking spez voted for Trump. You keep on puling the victim card, it ain't working for you buddy.
We all get harassed in political subs. If the fire is too hot, don't get in the pan.
Nope, you just have no grip on reality.
1 cstrafe 2018-09-12
Conservative sub mods have to comply with much stricter rules around here. I cited specific examples. The bar is much, much higher. I browse the left-wing echo chambers. I see what goes on there: threats to the President and his family, calls for violence against people who disagree with the hive mind, etc.
I regularly post on those subs I mentioned and they have to be whitewashed so that no one's feelings in /r/politics gets hurt. Conversely, as I previously mentioned, I have been harassed by TMOR and others who stalk me out in the subs I post in, which are not left-wing echo chambers. That means, they either link to my posts in other subs or I've generated a fan club.
So do we agree that violence across the board does not represent the majority of either side and is most likely the result of mental illness?
Never visited any of those except TD. TD has to comply with unreasonable moderation standards, when compared to the rest of reddit. I mean, ffs, it's not even allowed on the front page because the memes are too much for you and your friends.
Do you have proof of that claim? I'd love to see it.
Do we? As I mentioned earlier, TD can't even link to /r/politics without breaking the rules. The entire purpose of TMOR is to troll and ruin subs who don't agree with them.
1 BloodMoonTea 2018-09-12
Name something then. Go on. List all of the political violence initiated by right wing groups in the US since Trump was elected. I wonder if the total will even come close to that of the left. Shootings, stabbings, starting fires, etc.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
That's not what S8n told us...
1 NoopLocke 2018-09-12
Mk.
1 justarandyguy 2018-09-12
you have that completely backwards considering an 'alt right' sub was just banned, the left are the ones playing victim, factually conducting and inciting violence against others
you clearly also have never visited TGA and have 6 posts in your history as well, i mean there IS word for that kinda shit but its not allowed here bc its 'name calling' but it rhymes with schilling....
weird how you have next to no post history, ONLY frequent THIS sub but you know SO much regarding TGA
1 ___jamil___ 2018-09-12
lol was it liberals who showed up to Comet Pizza with guns?
I did. I just didn't post there. There are FAR more lurkers than posters on every website.
I'm not sure what you are talking about I have a post history going back at least a year
https://www.reddit.com/user/___jamil___
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
He knows the Qultists won't fact check him
1 justarandyguy 2018-09-12
and youve never left THIS sub, have 6 posts of your own on random subs
none indicate anything that you know what youre talking about.
why would i even bring it up if i wasnt aware of your first post regarding Comet Ping Pong?
so youre effectively proving me right anyhow
liberals showed up at Comet Pizza with guns?? you mean the guy who ran in there waving a gun firing ONE shot and hitting their HDD in their computer in the office?? that 'liberal' yeah..... liberals dont operate with guns, they use piss bottles, rocks, chains, mace, bear mace, and bike locks....
you 'frequented' TGA but never posted there?? there were over 70k subs as of patriots day, and you NEVER commented or made a post here?? foh NOT ONCE??? riiiiiiiiight
1 ___jamil___ 2018-09-12
i honestly have no idea what you are talking about. I have posts on all variety of subs, including this one. I assume you do to. I'm not sure what point you are trying to make.
nonsense.
what are you even on at this point?
Yeah, I go to t_d as well, but don't post there because they are dumb as shit.
Nope. Pretty easy. Maybe you should try not posting.
1 justarandyguy 2018-09-12
youre not really this dumb are you? literally a holday called 'patriots day' that was yesterday......
obvious shilling at this point
1 ___jamil___ 2018-09-12
never heard of this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriot_Day before. obviously it hasn't been widely adopted by anyone
1 justarandyguy 2018-09-12
Literally marked on calendars. And I never said federal holiday ether. And to say it’s not adopted by anyone spits in every American soldiers face.
Noble.... 😐
1 ___jamil___ 2018-09-12
Not on any calendars that i've ever seen in the last 17 years.
I said it wasn't widely adopted by anyone. Also, if soldiers are so sensitive that they can't handle me not acknowledging a dumb holiday, then those snowflakes don't deserve to be in the army.
1 justarandyguy 2018-09-12
K.
You keep telling yourself that.
It’s only noted to have observation at particular times and all....
Good work spitting on the graves of the fallen soldiers bruh.
It’s not a dumb holiday. It’s dumb that YOU refuse to recognize/acknowledge it.
Go to bed
1 justarandyguy 2018-09-12
you go to t_d too? sure you do....sure... you...do....
1 ___jamil___ 2018-09-12
lol why wouldn't I? it's a hilarious sub to watch dumb people.
1 seeking101 2018-09-12
so what is it about this particular topic that got you to finally break you lurking silence and post?
There have been WAYY more stupid topics posted here and on T_D to do what you're doing now, so why this topic today? Can we expect to see you after this thread dies?
1 ___jamil___ 2018-09-12
I don't lurk in conspiracy, I used to come here before it became a trump-shilling hellhole, so i have a feeling of ownership to the place. I've been here long before you and probably (sadly) long after (probably not on this account).
1 seeking101 2018-09-12
im not here for politics so couldnt care less about that
1 ___jamil___ 2018-09-12
...and yet you seem very concerned about my politics....
1 justarandyguy 2018-09-12
He’s calling you out for shitposting and schilling
1 seeking101 2018-09-12
concerned? not the right word you're looking for. All i did was ask you a question about why you came out of the wood work for this particular topic and you avoided answering it
1 justarandyguy 2018-09-12
Fuckin thank you lmao
1 dwarfwhore 2018-09-12
I myself have had my comments posted there and been brigaded against. I mean, c'mon dude... Are you acting like that doesn't happen?
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
So... Nothing? No violence at all?
Thought so :-)
1 Zalianthx 2018-09-12
imagine asking a question and then receiving this response lmaooo
1 jimbojones230 2018-09-12
Probably when or if they start inciting violence, harassment, or disseminating personal information...so, don’t hold your breath. To try and lump them in with TGA is delusional.
1 jdotg 2018-09-12
I disagee, my eyes see they are directly involved in targeted harassment...
Anybody that puts one side as better than another is delusional.
My opinion on this is pretty simple, how do you ban only one side of the same coin?!?
Thats the entire crutch of the issue at hand here. Its hypocritical and is effectively drowning out right leaning users. I want bipartisan/nonpartisan.
Not just one fucking side, which is the path we are steering towards with this type of censorship.
Now i haven't browsed TGA but many former users are saying this is bullshit.
Is it possible a concerted effort was put forth with drone accounts posting nonsense to get this desired result? I feel its more than likely and imo probably the real scenario of events.
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
Real question bud, are you retarded?
1 jdotg 2018-09-12
Hey a top mind user.
But no they dont harass people.
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
Nope, not a big fan of the place. What you said is objectively retarded. The folks being 'drowned out' are acting like awful people. I don't care who you are, if you act like an awful person, you lose your privileges. In this case, that's posting to reddit. Other cases might be being banned from a movie theater for yelling 'fire'. Or being taken off a bus for playing your music too loud. You (hopefully) get the idea. The folks making a fuss about the guy yelling fire, or the woman playing her music too loud, aren't "the other side of the coin". There is no correlation between what they're doing and what the people acting inappropriately are doing. There are objectively ethical, moral, true things. Valuing those things means you will eventually need to do something about unethical, immoral, or maliciously false statements or actions. What you're seeing is people rejecting values, which you may or may not subscribe to, as being unethical, immoral, or maliciously false. If our society wants to continue as a group, those are important things for everyone, regardless of political or religious affiliation, to feel are important. People (from all over the political place) have had enough, and the response from the folks acting shitty has been to ratchet up the violent rhetoric, increase hate speech, and spread more and more falsehoods, in the hopes of muddying the waters and preventing any actual truth from taking hold. So, no, this isn't a coin you're dealing with. "Both sides" aren't at fault. One is objectively and willfully wrong, and the other is loudly pointing that out. If you can't figure that out, or after I've explained it to you, can't accept it, you're honestly missing the ability to reason. No reasonable person believes that what was taking place on these subreddits is anywhere near the same as people calling them out as hateful, violent, or intentionally misleading. No reasonable person will believe that hate speech is the same as intolerance of hate speech. If you do, or if you don't think what was occurring was hate speech, you're not being reasonable.
1 albicsgo 2018-09-12
Wow this sure reeks of 47 chromies
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
Incredible response. Only the top minds, perhaps Q herself, could come up with such riveting dialogue. Please, give me another incredible response. It is so rare to have such an opportunity to speak with someone so intelligent and in tune with the world. I know you must have a response to such autistic writing such that you have witnessed today; surely if it's so far beneath your level of intellect, debunking any false narratives will be simple for such a great mind.
1 albicsgo 2018-09-12
ok maybe 48
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
Excuse my belated response, I am intimidated by your wisdom and ability to communicate. Please tell me, what do I need in order to speak with such grace and charisma? Is it simply a matter of drinking mountain dew equivalent to my weight every day, or is there more?
1 jdotg 2018-09-12
Your post history says otherwise. In fact you stated you love it. Lmfao fuck off
u/thirdstreetzero:
>There is nothing better than the triple parentheses. I fuckin love that. Absolute (((morons))).
FWIW, I did not even read your response.
1 AutoModerator 2018-09-12
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
Love what? The triple paren? Classic move, easily identifies the part of your speech you think matters most. It's like what bold normally does except for people that are mostly brain dead.
1 jdotg 2018-09-12
Im sorry, but did you refer to me as retarded and brain dead multiple times?
This TMOR shtick is tiring. We get it, you dont like other ideas. You wont stamp them out, no matter how much hypocritical assistance is given. How much of a serious fucking loser does one have to be, to be interested in that "hobby?"
Its pretty fucking weird from my POV, like borderline mental illness. Especially if one is so delusional that they think participating in TMOR brigades puts them on the "winning" side. They are like the kid that fucked your mom on Xbox. We all know they are here, but who really fucking cares? You all just get muted.
You stated you are not a big fan, yet you post there? Color me confused. You also stated, you love the triple parentheses. That in itself is quintessential TMOR. Their sub AFAIK started that trend. Color me even more confused.
In other words, you can type out 'I hate that place', but your actions speak louder. And then you just look like a liar. Even worse..
If you voice your support for triple parantheses, then you are supporting the sub and their targeted harassment. Relatively simple conclusion from a brain dead conspiratard...
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
Can we come together and find more creative ways to say retarded? I really like your inclusion of 'tard' in 'conspiracy'. I can start a google doc and we can add to it whenever we have a good thought.
1 jdotg 2018-09-12
What purpose do you serve?
1 jdotg 2018-09-12
No. Thanks for showing up.
1 CelineHagbard 2018-09-12
Removed. Rule 4.
1 CR90 2018-09-12
When have TMoR called for public hangings of political rivals?
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Look dude, don't start defending GA when you admit you're only going on second hand information.
OF COURSE they're going to say they were reasonable, and that they did nothing wrong.
1 jdotg 2018-09-12
Look dude, who enacted you gate keeper? Telling me what I can discuss lmfao. Fuck off..
Ill be sure to message you my comments first for approval
You have 5 messags in my inbox. Did i strike a nerve talking shit on top minds? You guys are losers, on the internet. Double whammy.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
No, just trolling the retards here.
I think you're paying it on a little too thick. You're way too upset and defensive about a sub you've "never been to" before. It's pretty clear you're trying to appear as an uninvolved observer
1 jdotg 2018-09-12
Ill double down here. Your self admitted hobby is to troll people...thats sad. Be honest with yourself, or don't, who fucking cares.
It seems like you are projecting your defense of tmor onto me and spinning as im some supporter.
The fact of the matter, whether i browsed the subs or not, is irregardless but thanks for really honing in on minute worthless details.
Its almost like you are here just to stir the pot, then you admitted thats the reason.
Enjoy your circle jerk fly trap.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Will do! :-)
1 JamesColesPardon 2018-09-12
Rules 5 and 10.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Do you think they are at all similar, or are you just wanting tit-for-tat?
1 jdotg 2018-09-12
Do you not think top minds incites harassment?
Because I do.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Calling someone out for saying something stupid isn't harassment, no matter how mad it makes you.
Compare it to actual death threats against a satire Twitter account, THAT is actual harasent
1 Diabolus-Ex-Machina 2018-09-12
They harassed me with their opinions REEEE
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Life is hard when you can't ban any dissenting thought from sight
1 Diabolus-Ex-Machina 2018-09-12
Right? GA wants free speech but will happily ban anyone who questions Q's questions.
The hypocrisy is hilarious today.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
It's like the saying goes "turn about is
fair playthe deep state"1 Rubieroo 2018-09-12
Not really hard to figure out this one. If you put together a forum for the specific purpose of discussing a topic and it gets inundated daily with people who are there specifically to PREVENT discussion, jettisoning the people who are there for no other purpose than to shut down discussion is logical.
Deleting the forum because you just don't like the topic is ridiculous.
1 SkelterHelter68 2018-09-12
Says the guy triggered by someone username...smh.
1 Diabolus-Ex-Machina 2018-09-12
I bet you liked that username don't you?
1 blaaaahhhhh 2018-09-12
You don’t think top minds harasses people?
1 RohypnolPickupArtist 2018-09-12
They're a sub pretty much just about harassing other sub users, the double standard is ridiculous.
1 blaaaahhhhh 2018-09-12
That’s what I mean
1 RohypnolPickupArtist 2018-09-12
I'm totally agreeing with you friend.
1 blaaaahhhhh 2018-09-12
The conspiracyundone mod/sub creator was outright bullied because of that place
I’ve featured in there once before too
1 TotesMessenger 2018-09-12
I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:
If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)
1 recono85 2018-09-12
"Lack of respect, wrong attitude, failure to obey authority. To the farm, immediately."
A Boy and His Dog quote that fits perfectly here. Makes me fucking sick.
1 Pyro_Cat 2018-09-12
A boy and his dog reference? Where the hell am I? Take your upvote.
1 recono85 2018-09-12
Topeka, in that movie, is exactly what they're after, man. Seeing stuff like these bans just drives that in for me.
Also, props on the familiarity. You might be surprised how young i am to know the film.
1 sadmep 2018-09-12
Great films don't have an age limit on appreciation.
1 recono85 2018-09-12
Unfortunately, they have an age limit on comsiderability-to-watch. Too many of my peers don't watch certain things just because they're old.
1 sadmep 2018-09-12
Get better film watching buddies to talk film with, problem solved :) jk, I know what you mean though.
1 Pyro_Cat 2018-09-12
I'm back in my 30's, watched it drunk in my 20s may need to rewatch.
1 Whoareyou559 2018-09-12
There has not been either of those things on our board
1 sadmep 2018-09-12
I didn't claim they were true or false, just stating the reasons stated by the ban message on the subs at the time i posted it. Mostly because i was curious if the reasons would changed later.
1 Whoareyou559 2018-09-12
Valid af
1 WooTs_67 2018-09-12
Funny how TMOR gets a pass
1 magnoliasmanor 2018-09-12
They get a pass because they don't actually incite violence, they just paint a picture of how retarded some of these users truly are. They never ask to lunch anyone, they never push to doxx people and they never push for real violence. At best they ask for bans and for subs to be removed.
1 WooTs_67 2018-09-12
Funny how you didn't read what I quoted. You did leave out the part where you guys do incite harassment. It's the whole purpose of your sub.
1 magnoliasmanor 2018-09-12
Of course I read what you quoted. All I say is "The Golden rule".
TMOR doesn't ask for an uprising, for killing of people or doxxing, they just make fun of you retards is all.
1 WooTs_67 2018-09-12
Its like all your doing is coming over to this sub and harassing its users. Seems like TMOR incites harassment. A reason that two of those subs were banned.
1 magnoliasmanor 2018-09-12
A sub for discussing topics not always agreed upon? You mean questioning statements of people and always questions in what's real?
Where am I? Oh that's right. A conspiracy sub that teaches to question everything right? I suppose I could just blindly follow all fo your statements and the statements of everyone else?
I also didn't land here through TMOR. I appreciate the sub for pointing our hilarity, but by no means do I just follow their statements.
1 JamesColesPardon 2018-09-12
That's not what you're saying over there...
https://www.reddit.com/r/TopMindsOfReddit/comments/9faf2z/rgreatawakening_has_been_banned/e5vk9ry?context=3
1 AutoModerator 2018-09-12
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 JamesColesPardon 2018-09-12
Removed. Rule 10.
1 JamesColesPardon 2018-09-12
Rule 5.
1 Rubieroo 2018-09-12
Yup. This was an elimination of Q subreddits. Everyone there knew it was a matter of time.
1 Absh4x0r 2018-09-12
And r/topmindsofreddit is still up lmao this site is comped as fuck
1 scoripowarrior 2018-09-12
That's all BS and we know it! I am so pissed off right now!
1 dreamorpheus 2018-09-12
Kind of strange that all Q subs at the same time were all in violation of something and banned. Hmmm... sounds more like Reddit is trying to censor & suppress information. Right before Midterms, I foresee more censorship and banning on Reddit and elsewhere.
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
i was on GA for 8+ hours a day. Never once saw doxxing or anything other than "X should hang" type comments, which were immediately deleted and user banned
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
Yeah but you and your sick ilk kept fucking posting dog whistle racist posts, and other shit meant to identify "the enemy". And seeing how fond of being terrorists you all are, it was only a matter if time before you did something highly illegal thanks to a subreddit
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
no, not really. and stop using the word ilk, it's a libtard whistle
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
No? It's a word. "libtard"? What are you? 12?
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
in your case, libturd
1 ShellOilNigeria 2018-09-12
Removed. Rule 10.
1 Annies_Boobs 2018-09-12
https://imgur.com/a/awbJjMZ
1 Buy_The-Ticket 2018-09-12
Don't use words I don't understand or I'll call Q to eviscerate you with his patriot sword crafted from the tears of a thousand autists during the great tendie genocide of 2018!
1 qoa 2018-09-12
Everything is blanket racism to you people. It's why the world is rejecting your ideology. If anything this action by Reddit is going to have the opposite effect. When they said "the enemy" they meant people like you based on rhetoric, not race, no matter how hard you try to spin it. The worlds waking up to this kind of stuff.
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
Your movement is just the occupy wall Street movement with extra steps. One of which is racism. It's not new, nor is it esoteric. It's just new to you.
There's not some revolution happening. It's more like when someone reposts a meme for the hundredth time and it still gets a 70, 000 up votes from people who haven't seen it before.
1 qoa 2018-09-12
It's not "my movement". If life had taught me anything it is that groups that get ostracized that steadfastly might just have something interesting to say. Given online is all filter/content bubbles anymore, I actively seek out is being suppressed. It usually makes for fun reading. At this point on the internet, with the amount of fake atroturfed bullshit everywhere, I like to look for the logic behind smears. What was their message? Patriotism, positivity, and unity seemed to be the general vibe that I took away. On the flip side you have nothing but posts like yours shouting it down calling it a larp. One message is negative one is positive.
1 cjf_colluns 2018-09-12
They believe a satanic pedophile illumanti ring secretly runs the United States. That’s not patriotism, it’s paranoid schizophrenia.
Their positivity is the delusion that Q is going to turn America into their imagined idillic version of America. Q has been purposefully vague about this so his followers can imagine whatever positive outcome they want.
They only seek to unify right-wing Christians. Atheists, queers, and progressives have no place in Q’s America. They are the enemies of the Qult.
If that is really the “vibe” you took away from GA, I honestly recommend you look into the Satanic Moral Panic of the 90s.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satanic_ritual_abuse
https://www.vox.com/2016/10/30/13413864/satanic-panic-ritual-abuse-history-explained
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_panic
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/McMartin_preschool_trial
https://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2014/08/04/30-years-later-key-figures-reflect-on-mcmartin-child-abuse-case/
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day-care_sex-abuse_hysteria
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2R21tWs-qCw
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_satanic_ritual_abuse_allegations
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oak_Hill_satanic_ritual_abuse_trial
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faith_Chapel_Church_ritual_abuse_case
http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sdut-dale-akiki-reflects-historic-molestation-trial-2012may09-story.html
What Q and his followers are doing is not new.
1 HelperBot_ 2018-09-12
Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satanic_ritual_abuse
HelperBot v1.1 /r/HelperBot_ I am a bot. Please message /u/swim1929 with any feedback and/or hate. Counter: 211469
1 qoa 2018-09-12
What you people aren't seeing is that shouting down anyone questioning the mainstream narratives is getting shouted down and banned everywhere online. It's having the opposite effect you're hoping for. It's making them look pretty validated and putting fuel behind the "paranoid schizophrenia".
You're saying people hoping for a better world are crazy, and using Wikipedia of all places to validate your point in support of the suppression of ideas. Keep your head down and don't question anything on /r/Conspiracy !
1 cjf_colluns 2018-09-12
Their idea of a better world is one where only Christians exist. I don’t exist in their ideal world.
That’s fine though. They can want me to not exist. The problem is that if Q said ______ was a pedophile, all his followers would descend upon that person and dox and threaten them. See @s8n. These people didn’t question that twitter Satan was a part of the satanic pedophile plot, because Q told them he was.
If you can look at all the threats @s8n received after Q said he was a pedophile, with no proof, and believe that is something Reddit should endorse, or is “patriotism,” and “positive,” I don’t know what to tell you. Qanon was a imagined pedophile witch hunt weaponizing right-wing boomers against the left.
You say it was about unity but it was feeding its audience a narrative of ultimate dis-unity. How can these people ethically compromise with someone they believe to be a satanic pedophile that just wants to undermine everything they believe in?
There’s a line, and Qanon was created on the wrong side. Just abusing their influence over gullible idiots. They’ve been straight up wrong about so much. Q said, a year ago, that Hillary Clinton was already in custody. Or at least that’s how people interpreted it. That’s the problem. Qanon is set up in a way in which the followers will justify anything because they’re fighting against the ultimate enemy, literally the embodiment of evil on earth, the biblical Satan. Qanon, has to be right because otherwise Satan wins. It doesn’t matter if it’s all a lie.
You know pamphlet anon outed himself as Q on CBTS_Stream twice, right? He was logged into the Q tripcode. It’s all a hoax, preying on Christian boomer’s psychological vulnerabilities and weaponizing their ideological fears against whoever pamphlet anon chooses. And then people show up with a gun at a pizza shop or a dam and demand they release the child sex slaves.
Like holy shit, learn to recognize a psy-op. This shit deserves to be deleted from the internet.
As for the idea that deplatforming leads to signal boosting, that’s been proven false. I won’t even mention the names of the failures who were kicked off every platform years ago and have no online presence at all anymore. We’ll see how Alex ends up as he has a pretty large audience, and I want to know if he can keep those numbers up, post-deplatforming, because no one else has.
1 qoa 2018-09-12
[citations needed]
It's easy to make claims of all this evil shit you refer to, like them "wanting to get rid of everything except christians" existing which I never saw there. It's also easy to plaster a wall of strawman examples that can be disproven as they banned the entire subreddit.
Link the Q drop from 8chan (which is the ONLY place he posts)that says he's [poor oppressed s8n] a pedophile. They linked actual posts by that guy saying all kinds of fucked up shit that you hand wave away. Before you ask me to provide proof, your pro censorship pals deleted it.
Posts like the novel you just typed perfectly illustrate the danger of censorship/deplatforming. Once you've been alive long enough to events get rewritten over time you'll understand. Now that the subreddit is gone, people can let fly all sorts of crazy rhetoric about how evil it was an form a false narrative. They can do this because they had to delete the proof to make the claims of such evil credible. Otherwise joereddituserbaconlvr12 could just go there and see what it was all about. Now they can't, and people like you can apply your narrative to the past.
1 cjf_colluns 2018-09-12
No point in replying to a coward who deletes their account immediately after commenting.
You’re just adding to the noise. All this QAnon shit is just repackaged satanic panic from the 90s.
1 Kittens_n_stuff 2018-09-12
“Now that the subreddit is gone, people can let fly all sorts of crazy rhetoric about how evil it was an form a false narrative. They can do this because they had to delete the proof to make the claims of such evil credible.” Thank you, I never thought of it like this. It reminds me of pizzagate days when you would direct someone to look at something on voat and they would refuse to visit that site because it had porn on it or something. They would argue against pizzagate religiously and always come up with a reason as to why they wouldn’t look at evidence. And yet still they would argue. It’s about creating a narrative not examining facts
1 RocketSurgeon22 2018-09-12
Really? Politics is chalked full of that shit and makes racists comments all fucking day. Yet it's a fucking default sub. This censorship is fine. Regulation will come to support free speech and there will be no Russian Collusion or impeachment. Have your short lived day for now. Your life will be a fucking nightmare in a year once you actually see how many people think opposite of you.
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
Wtf. There is ALREADY Russian collusion. Youve been sipping on the klan aid too long. Crawl back under your rock.
1 RocketSurgeon22 2018-09-12
There is no Russian Collusion. 0 and if you want to ignore the facts and claim it is then you are the one living under a rock.
1 UncleSnake3301 2018-09-12
Now we're all terrorists too? Sweet!!!
1 mbassani91 2018-09-12
8 hours a day? Wow... Most people would call that a job.
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
i was on there all day at work, so yes it was a job
1 mbassani91 2018-09-12
Sounds productive...
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
About as productive as arguing about conspiracies all day long TopMind
1 mbassani91 2018-09-12
I'd agree, maybe you can let that person know. I've got a job to do.
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
put some more years in peon, then you can relax all day like I do while people like you do the heavy lifting lol
1 mbassani91 2018-09-12
Well at least you admit you're lazy... That's a step in the right direction.
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
Not lazy, maybe you'll understand this when you have an actual higher tier job
1 mbassani91 2018-09-12
Currently a 3rd year State police officer and our chief doesn't sit around on reddit... Go figure. Some of us actually have a job to do, not just report to an office that won't fire them due to time served. There's no sitting around for us.
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
LOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
I have many friends in law enforcement. No.
1 mbassani91 2018-09-12
Wow... Enlightening. Hopefully one day I can work hard enough to get a job as a Reddit shit poster like yourself.
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
Judging by your post history, achievement unlocked!
1 mbassani91 2018-09-12
"Agreed 100%. I still want to know if any of the pharaohs were Caucasian for example but that news would never escape the history handlers in Egypt :("
You were saying?
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Egyptian_race_controversy
1 mbassani91 2018-09-12
Is that supposed to help your case? A public website that can be edited by anyone to say literally anything? I guess laziness is the least of your problems. Carry on.
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
what case?
Stick with geckos and OCD bro
1 mbassani91 2018-09-12
Case for any sort of legitimacy to your statement... That ship has sailed.
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
As you dig into my post history LOL
1 mbassani91 2018-09-12
Having some short term memory loss?
1 sinedup4thiscomment 2018-09-12
I followed to the end of this thread to say that you are both fucking children.
1 mbassani91 2018-09-12
I mean this is a conspiracy thread, you got what you "sined" up for.
1 sinedup4thiscomment 2018-09-12
Your personal opinion about the quality of this sub has little to do with the failings of your character and behavior.
1 mbassani91 2018-09-12
Counterproductive like a guy who uses his 8 hour work day to browse cryptic posts from anonymous 4 Chan users?
1 mbassani91 2018-09-12
Nothing says productivity like reading through an entire thread just to tell someone your unsolicited opinion.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Well it's on the internet so it must be true!
Fucking ignorant boomers believing everything you read.
1 Renatusisk 2018-09-12
Peon? Yeah I'm sure you're on the good guy side.
1 SIGHR 2018-09-12
ah so it was full of boomers
1 Kat_B0T 2018-09-12
It had the mean age of 60. I made a post in there asking people’s age, boomer central.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Lazy boomer Qultist detected.
Why not retire and give someone productive a job? That would give you more time to fight the deep state
1 UncleSnake3301 2018-09-12
God you guys are fucking ridiculous.
1 Rocky_Road_To_Dublin 2018-09-12
Mommy can't make his tendies until she gets home after 5, he needs something to do
1 PreachyVegan 2018-09-12
why the hell are you guys downvoting this wageslave just because he has a job where he can be online all day? he's got it dialled!
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Thread derailment: initiated.
1 SouthernJeb 2018-09-12
Lol. 8 hours a day?!? Jesus.
1 suprmario 2018-09-12
Yeah that's just really sad.
1 SwenKa 2018-09-12
I couldn't stand 8 minutes there...
1 seedster5 2018-09-12
Do you live at home or have mental illness?
1 EvilSporkOfDeath 2018-09-12
Go outside
1 Xalteox 2018-09-12
Err, do you not remember the @s8n incident?
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
nope
1 Xalteox 2018-09-12
8 hours a day and you don't remember it, really now? I don't believe you, but this is a refresher for anyone else interested
Your sub doxxed the Twitter account @s8n account after Q claimed it was being run by "big names." As it turns out it was just a normal 24 year old kid shitposting and he even came onto your sub to complain about being doxxed.
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
i still have no idea wtf s8n is
1 Xalteox 2018-09-12
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DkcwK2BUwAAYCYj.jpg
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
so why not just post satan?
and no, i knew that account was associated with a lot of suspected pedos but no clue what you're talking about with the doxxing thing
1 Xalteox 2018-09-12
https://archive.is/UkzXy
Well I'm not here to convince you, you are clearly off the deep end. But for anyone else interested in the doxing and harassment, the link documenting everything is above. Sadly since the sub is banned, most of the links in the sub are bogus but you can find archived pages if you are interested.
1 TMORCanEat1000Dicks 2018-09-12
Why are you blatantly attacking him and making him out to be dishonest? Is it that crazy to think that he just doesn't recall what you're talking about or didn't see it?
1 Xalteox 2018-09-12
I don't see how he saw none of this if he truly spent 8 hours a day on the sub.
1 PatriotScum 2018-09-12
Because the guy is claiming to be on the subreddit for 8 hours a day. The s8n was very much discussed on that subreddit with people targeting that twitter account based off the "Q drop".
1 cjf_colluns 2018-09-12
He just said that he knew the account was “connected with pedos.” It’s just some 24 year old running a spoof account. Saying he’s “connected to pedos” means this user is aware of the harassment, or at least the reason for it.
Just because this one user decided not to harass the account “connected with pedos,” doesn’t mean that the sub he spent 8hrs a day on didn’t propagated the idea that the account was “connected with pedos,” to a group of people that harassed people they imagined were pedophiles.
1 MajorEstablishment 2018-09-12
Some pretty nutty people!!! All over a spoof account!
1 justarandyguy 2018-09-12
so wait, youre saying a kids twitter troll account tweeting to TRDJ is somehow an example of 'calling for doxing' foh
1 niftygull 2018-09-12
Hey can you explain what shitposting is?
1 whacko_jacko 2018-09-12
There is ZERO evidence that is true. The moderators contacted him apologizing for any harassment and asked him for screenshots so they could investigate who was responsible. The person was not able to produce a single shred of evidence pointing back to /r/greatawakening, contrary to his claims.
1 Xalteox 2018-09-12
I demonstrated proof further down this comment chain.
The mod deleted that comment apologizing to him FYI. But that comment also did not ask for any evidence, if you want to prove me wrong, please do.
1 jeepersjess 2018-09-12
What was that?
1 EveryoneisOP3 2018-09-12
The users of great awakening became convinced that the owner of the twitter handle @s8n was a 'big player' because Q told them so. Turns out it was some random 20 something guy that they kept doxcing and harassing.
1 lvl1ndgalvl3 2018-09-12
I've been following the whole thing pretty closely, don't recall this happening at all.
1 Xalteox 2018-09-12
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DkbTKZSUUAAH_Wf.jpg
1 UncleSnake3301 2018-09-12
me either. sounds like more made up bullshit to cast everyone involved with Q in a bad light.
1 jimboballa 2018-09-12
The S8n thing was a q drop so it could have come from any site where people read q. Did they prove that the doxxing was from GA? My guess is no.
1 Kittens_n_stuff 2018-09-12
Could you direct me to the Q post in question? I don’t remember it either
1 Xalteox 2018-09-12
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DkbTKZSUUAAH_Wf.jpg
1 timstolt1 2018-09-12
I have been on the GA sub and following Q (even though IDK if it is larp or not)...and I've never heard of "s8n" ...nor have I ever seen any violence or bullying. IMHO the sub got compromised:
Either it is a larp, and the people running the larp purposefully doxed and harassed so as to get the sub banned, to add credibility
May or may not be a larp, but those in opposition to it infiltrated it, and false-flagged (acted as though on its behalf in doxing someone).
1 No_More_Candy 2018-09-12
Wait, so you never saw the doxxing but you somehow KNOW it was a false flag. Fucking lol. Was everyone that used the sub this dumb?
1 timstolt1 2018-09-12
How much do they pay you to do this? --or are you so soul-less that you do it for free? Tell us, do you work for share blue or are you simply part of the JIDF network? Or maybe you simply have Trump-derangement syndrome? Pretty obvious some kind of politic is blocking your reading comprehension.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
It's funny because you're the one obviously working here. Nobody does these mental gymnastics for free, unless they're a fool
1 timstolt1 2018-09-12
Only fools assume the obvious, RowdyPanties.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Lol, ok bud.
Occams razor is deep state!
1 DancesWithPugs 2018-09-12
Let's hear your definition of Occam's razor please, I'm curious if you know what it actually says without looking it up.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
The simplest explanation is usually the correct one, like "Donald trump is actually as incompetent as he sounds"
1 DancesWithPugs 2018-09-12
"The principle can be interpreted as stating: Among competing hypotheses, the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected."
1 No_More_Candy 2018-09-12
Did you think I didn't notice how you deflected away from answering my question? Good try, but we're not dumb enough to fall for your rhetorical tricks.
1 timstolt1 2018-09-12
I'm Jewish. Sorry.
1 Balthanos 2018-09-12
Removed. Rule 10
1 Balthanos 2018-09-12
Removed. Rule 10
1 Spartan1117 2018-09-12
users of greatawakening and other q followeres harrased a guy on twitter with the name @s8n because q linked to his account. When he complained on r/greatawakening the mods deleted all his comments.
1 RocketSurgeon22 2018-09-12
Swampwatch didn't get taken down?
1 eaglejm 2018-09-12
Confirming this is a prime example of abuse of banning. Its the ministry of truth / wrongthink in practice. I find it funny all these people acting like they deserved the ban and are defending the action and the fact this is the conspiracy sub. Regulation of thoughts is popular now!
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
This sub was never like this until around the time Trump was elected. I've even discussed it with mods here and they agree. Look at the detractors, and the subs they post in (or how their posts are limited solely to here)
1 nikgk 2018-09-12
I agree. The nicest sub on Reddit. This is shocking. Fuck Redditt
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
the official new forum is on voat...fuck this place
https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening
1 Rocky_Road_To_Dublin 2018-09-12
bye felicia
1 BASEDME7O 2018-09-12
Lmao 8+ hours a day. It’s not a cult though
1 whacko_jacko 2018-09-12
Oh save your self-righteous indignation. There are people that spend 8+ hours a day on any major subreddit. I'm not saying that's healthy, but it is a fact.
1 this__is__conspiracy 2018-09-12
How many of those subs are super religious?
1 whacko_jacko 2018-09-12
What? I was a regular there, and I'm not religious at all.
1 this__is__conspiracy 2018-09-12
The constant "God bless you", "Pray for Trump", Bible verses everywhere, etc, didn't bother you? I followed for awhile but once it got overly Christian I was out.
1 whacko_jacko 2018-09-12
Sure, it bothered me sometimes, but I can tolerate differences in opinion on religion. I spoke out about it sometimes and sometimes I got a positive response from the community. Sometimes it was negative. It was a mixed bag with a variety of biases and beliefs.
1 RocketSurgeon22 2018-09-12
Yeah a cult is when a man of color supports a party opposite of his cults ideology and gets publically shamed. A cult is when people donate money to criminals that will get indicted like McCabe and Strzok. A cult censors anyone who disagrees with their opinion. Sound familiar? Denial is the 1st step.
1 BASEDME7O 2018-09-12
I mean I didn’t want it to get banned. I loved that sub. It was a firsthand look into people descending into insanity like you
1 UncleSnake3301 2018-09-12
All you smug assholes will see whats up very soon. The writing is already on the wall. Everything will come into the light.
1 BASEDME7O 2018-09-12
You’ve been saying that for months and not one thing has happened lmao.
You backed a shitty president and you just follow this shit so you don’t have to admit that. Get over it and move on
1 ntschaef 2018-09-12
That is the worst forced definition I remember seeing. Alternate facts I guess?
1 RocketSurgeon22 2018-09-12
Worst definition? Haha alternative facts?
Signs you are in a cult:
Isolating members and penalizing them for leaving.
Suppressing criticism by censoring outsider views, theories and opinions. Often creating new rules of correctness and punishment and shaming cyles to those that do not follow.
Leaders are above the law.
Thought reform methods are forced.
These are all signs of a cult.
1 ntschaef 2018-09-12
I'll agree that these are SOME attributes of a cult. You are forgetting that they are critical of general opinion (otherwise these can be applied to any group). If you disagree, remember that realizing you are in denial is the first step (FTFY).
1 RocketSurgeon22 2018-09-12
It doesn't apply to any group.
1 RocketSurgeon22 2018-09-12
Liberals even donated money via gofundme to McCabe and Strozok who will be convicted and in prison. Yet you claim this can be applied to any group. Stay in denial bro
1 ntschaef 2018-09-12
I'm just replying to the properties you listed. If your going to redefine words be careful about including yourself in it. Just a bit of advice. Feel free to ignore it if you desire to remain ignorant.
1 frisbee_coach 2018-09-12
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/breaking-reddit-shuts-down-second-largest-pro-trump-subreddit/
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Yeah and the right would NEVER stoop so low
Lol
1 exoticstructures 2018-09-12
Roger Stone--lol I was doing that shit in elementary school
1 jimbojones230 2018-09-12
If that’s true, I recommend updating your username to “Confusion_delusion”.
1 abcdavis 2018-09-12
It's in the news.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-09-12
Ive visited it every single day since it started. Never once seen a post about doxxing, or inviting violence.
What I did see was this week there was a huge, HUGE new concentrated downvote brigade. We're talking hundreds of downvote a minute after posting.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
So you missed the S8n hysteria?
1 pilgrimboy 2018-09-12
Sounds like banning S8n rather than the sub would have been a wise course of action. I've been at work all day and didn't see any of it.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Wrong, because S8n is an obvious satire account minding it's own business and you're all proto fascist brownshirts
1 pilgrimboy 2018-09-12
Shows how much I know about all of that. I just read Q posts and the discussions.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Annnd now you're back to knowing nothing. Typical.
1 Unkn0wn77777771 2018-09-12
Can you explain to me the S8n issue? I am completely out of the loop on this.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Some satire Twitter account mentioned pizza a couple times over the course of several years so OF COURSE that means its a part of the pizzagate conspiracy.
Yeah, that's the rigorous investigation that the Qult is known for
1 Unkn0wn77777771 2018-09-12
Got ya, so I am assuming that is the reason for the doxxing? Trying to get more information about S8n?
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
It's hard to sort fact from fiction with all of this, but the guy was getting tons of hate mail and death threats. When he went to GA to try and reason with them the mods asked for evidence then deleted his posts with the evidence. Then they said he never provided evidence.
1 eleminnop 2018-09-12
So the problem was the mods not the users?
Why the fuck ban the whole sub? It's not the mod's sub.
We obviously know why, but there are somehow people out there who don't get it, and are fucking it up fore those of us who do.
1 cjf_colluns 2018-09-12
The “reason” for the doxing was to harass him. When they found out he was a 24 year old kid, connected to nobody, they didn’t stop. Q said he was connected so therefore he is connected, no evidence needed. Get your pitchforks. Kill the satanic pedophile cult member.
They found out where he lived and sent him pictures with crosshairs over house. That was after they knew who he was. After they knew he was a nobody. Because he can’t be a nobody cause Q said so.
1 Adarcer 2018-09-12
No ... that is false. could tell you the facts but I don not want to spoil the ending for you !
1 Adarcer 2018-09-12
Quick question since that post originated from 8chan, what makes you think It violated redits TOS, or even twitters ? This is some "Ministry of Truth -1984" level of suppression here ... hopefully you never question the narrative and actually wake up else your next..
1 eikogray1111 2018-09-12
I contributed to those downvotes.
1 Foundmyvape 2018-09-12
I visited every day and it was far from rare to see posts encouraging secret trials and executions of political figures.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-09-12
I know that a lot of people reading are idiots, but I'm not.
1 Foundmyvape 2018-09-12
I’m not sure what you are trying to say.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-09-12
Oh I think you do Trebeck.
1 Foundmyvape 2018-09-12
Wqg1wgaetfi
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-09-12
Take your panties off
1 MrJDouble 2018-09-12
"Doxing" is the blanket reason they use to ban subs.
1 eaglejm 2018-09-12
Reddit should be forced to show the evidence and reason for a ban especially large subs with lots of activity. If the reason for the ban is on political reason then the ban is invalid and a lie.
1 Assailant_TLD 2018-09-12
I...I can’t...people aren’t this thick right?
I take it you’re proposing we nationalize reddit??
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
That's how monopolies work. Do you think the water company can shut your water off if you're a Republican?
1 Assailant_TLD 2018-09-12
What are you talking about? Reddit has a monopoly?
Water is legally treated as a utility sooooo no? Duh?
1 Kind_Of_A_Dick 2018-09-12
What is Reddit monopolizing?
1 Doctor_Leo_Marvin 2018-09-12
that guy's free time
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Subreddits
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
They can shut you off if you repeatedly violate the terms of service.
Do you not know how contracts work?
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
No one violated the terms of service.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Says who? You?
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Post proof of violations of reddit's terms of service that didn't result in people being banned from that sub.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
I don't have to :-)
1 Foundmyvape 2018-09-12
There is this thing called a forum. Put up a few hundred bucks and you can call for political opponents to be killed all day long.
1 eaglejm 2018-09-12
As i said show the reasons for the ban, I am on there enough to know in general how the board is run and I did not see things that would result in a board level ban.
1 Assailant_TLD 2018-09-12
Yea you said force..who’s gonna do that lol?
You can want the company to do whatever. They don’t agree they can just say fuck you. Ain’t capitalism grand?
1 eaglejm 2018-09-12
Well I would say with your feet leave the platform. It happened to Myspace and digg. Hilarious so much downvotes when all I said was show the reason for the banning. Shills or useful idiots love the conspiracy board.
1 hsbunny 2018-09-12
i'll see you on voat :)
1 Assailant_TLD 2018-09-12
Turns out most people are reasonable and don’t really give a shit about bigots and racists.
That’s why Reddit is still alive and kicking and Voat is...well Voat.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
I am shocked, SHOCKED! That the admins didn't consult you before doing what they want with their property
1 timstolt1 2018-09-12
It would be nice if there were some form of justice, instead of just fascism, even if it is "privately owned". These companies like to act all democratic...until something goes against their narrative.
Reddit for you
1 superfluid 2018-09-12
OMG you guys are hilarious
No wonder you idiots got banned.
1 timstolt1 2018-09-12
Oy vey! Look at the hilarious goyim! Jidf is not real. Share Blue is not real. David Brock memo = not real. Go back to sleep goyim. You are very tired. I think I am going to slide under some warm blankets for a nice long nap, and then when I get up I will stay off reddit and live a productive life.
1 superfluid 2018-09-12
https://pics.awwmemes.com/days-without-1-jewish-tricks-no-days-without-jewish-tricks-21703920.png
1 CleverJokeOrSomeShit 2018-09-12
Could you not with the antisemitism and the rambling?
1 timstolt1 2018-09-12
Don't like it? -go somewhere else or ignore it!
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Try telling that to the mods :-)
1 Foundmyvape 2018-09-12
No. You are free to speak your racist nonsense just as others are free to call it out.
1 timstolt1 2018-09-12
Are you anti-Semitic? I happen to be a Jew who doesn't stand for the zionist *%$&# that half my nation spews. To deny JIDF, share blue, CTR, etc, is the mark of a tool.
1 Foundmyvape 2018-09-12
I don’t deny they exist. I also don’t think share blue or ctr holds much power. The jidf is a different story.
I also find it distasteful for someone to rail on about Jewish control while using terms like oy vey.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Keep it up, hopefully they'll ban this sub too :-)
1 CelineHagbard 2018-09-12
Removed. Rule 5.
1 timstolt1 2018-09-12
1 Denniosmoore 2018-09-12
Forced by who? Why? What?
1 frisbee_coach 2018-09-12
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/breaking-reddit-shuts-down-second-largest-pro-trump-subreddit/
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
From the same people that brought you "fuck your feelings libsuit!" In 2016 now present to you "fuck, my feelings!" In 2018
1 abcdavis 2018-09-12
It's affiliation with domestic terrorism.
1 UncleSnake3301 2018-09-12
LMFAO!
1 frisbee_coach 2018-09-12
https://mobile.twitter.com/howleyreports/status/1039956125402255360
1 allonthesameteam 2018-09-12
Confirmed? Who? How can this hit so many subs at the same time without someone in charge making or letting it happen?
1 Astrocesped 2018-09-12
Well then, I have many saved posts to archive before it all goes down.
1 Rakhoon 2018-09-12
Its because r/theburnout2018 is using bots to mass flag subreddits
1 vea_ariam 2018-09-12
Oddly GA wasn't on the list.
They may be a scapegoat or GA may have been the actual target
1 Adarcer 2018-09-12
look in the side bar stage 3 anyways guys/girls go to crumbs page there is a backup site already..
1 Ax3god 2018-09-12
This
1 lowercase_capitalist 2018-09-12
TheBanOut is a political operation and the power mods are the useful idiots of the admins.
The great awakening was growing exponentially - up to 70k subs. We were celebrating 40k like a month ago. It really was the only place on reddit to discuss the fallout from things like the FISA abuse scandal (which was considered a crazy conspiracy 6 months ago and is unequivocal fact now) and the CIA/DOJ/FBI collusion against Trump. They had to take it down, but if they just banned that subreddit the censorship would be obvious in media coverage. They needed cover. So they found a bunch of unsavoury subs to create an association and a 'movement' to keep focus from what they were really targeting. They didn't list it on the subreddit for this reason, so the SJW narrative would be established publicly first, and then great awakening would be caught up in it.
Do you really think they care about violence given no one is touching ANTIFA speech? Do you really think they care about these SJW issues? They've created tools to enact political censorship in the name of morality.
1 UncleSnake3301 2018-09-12
Im sure the real number of subscribers is exponentially higher than 70K. Im sure they have manipulated our subscriber numbers just like theyve manipulated everything else. I saw somewhere the real number was 297K, but I dont know how true that is.
1 McFluffTheCrimeCat 2018-09-12
Except there was no FISA abuse if you actual watch or read testimony transcripts sooo.
1 centraleft 2018-09-12
That subreddit is disturbing in a way I can't quite put my finger on. Sure some of the subreddits that have been banned where pretty shitty places but idk the whole thing seems dirty and wrong.
1 GinoMarley1 2018-09-12
Its some totalitarian world government shit.
1 UncleSnake3301 2018-09-12
Its fascism at work.
1 Too_Weird_Too_Rare 2018-09-12
Globalist fascism currently inhabits the left like a puppet (like they did the neo cons during the bush years) and projects everything it is and is doing onto everyone else.
1 WhatIfZodWasOneOfUs 2018-09-12
Probably because you literally have to comment "I fully support banout 2018" in any one of the very few posts, or your comment gets automatically deleted.
Also, it blatantly violates Reddit rules. I'm almost positive it's a joint effort, enabled by the leaders of Reddit, in coordination with all other Social Media outlets to censor modern conservatism viewpoints into the 2018 Midterms.
Fascist. Communist tactics.
1 take-to-the-streets 2018-09-12
Are you a moron? It’s clearly bait lol. They’re just making a post after subreddits get banned to troll people.
1 ShellOilNigeria 2018-09-12
Removed. Rule 10.
1 Adarcer 2018-09-12
your missing this piece of the puzzle r/againsthatesubreddits
1 take-to-the-streets 2018-09-12
It’s a troll
1 take-to-the-streets 2018-09-12
Reddit bans don’t work the same as twitter bans dude. Mass flagging subreddits does nothing. Reddit hesitantly bans subreddits after internal discussion.
1 Adarcer 2018-09-12
1) Create sockpuppet accounts 2) Post hateful, brigadiering, doxxing comments 3) Report subreddit, citing your own sockpuppet account
while step 1-2-3 are ongoing expect brigadiering down-voting. r/againsthatesubreddits and r/thebanout2018 they really fucked up and messed with a board of people who do allot of research and have brought so much to light did they really think they could do this and not get caught :P
1 take-to-the-streets 2018-09-12
The banout is a troll sub lmao. How do you people not get this? If they actually had these sockpuppet accounts all the posts there wouldn’t be downvoted. For a group of hyper-online loonies you sure are easy to bait.
1 Adarcer 2018-09-12
Exactly what someone who "fully supports banout 2018" would say. tell your friends were on to them.
1 take-to-the-streets 2018-09-12
Dude N8 posts the lists after subreddits get banned lol. He’s known for trolling right wing people on reddit. How are you this gullible?
1 Adarcer 2018-09-12
So the list without strikeouts does not mean anything, seriously dude i am one of the least gullible people you will ever meet, my bullshit detectors are very active. It is not a troll site... its a planning site (landing page) I have done this same thing with a clan I ran (to give a list of targets) except I knew how to do it properly.
1 take-to-the-streets 2018-09-12
You do realise N8 edits that list, right? And he makes the “phase” posts after the bans.
How do you think a random reddit user is able to ban these subreddits? That’s not how reddit works
1 McFluffTheCrimeCat 2018-09-12
The mods of greatawakening were supporting there used doxxing the @s8tan guy from twitter. Full articles linked all over with his personal info from some blog while deleting posts of the actual guy asking them to please stop harassing him. Stop pretending the doxxing and calls to violence weren’t from members of the sub. We all saw that shit.
1 _CaptainObvious 2018-09-12
What if I told you the people advocating for the bans are the ones with the power to ban them? what if I told you all they needed was an excuse to get away with it?
1 take-to-the-streets 2018-09-12
What are you talking about? If the people who wanted to ban these subreddits could, they would’ve done it ages ago. They’ve had an “excuse” since forever.
1 Rakhoon 2018-09-12
Would not mass flagging subreddits using bots make the owners of reddit more likely to look at the subreddots, and even more take them down as a result?
1 take-to-the-streets 2018-09-12
All the subs that get banned are pretty large. Reddit is a massive company, and bans take a lot of internal discussion. They would’ve been looking at these subs already, for months.
1 Rakhoon 2018-09-12
So why does this subreddit just show up now as the bans begin happening? And for the phases, how come they put something on there and it gets banned later on?
1 take-to-the-streets 2018-09-12
The subreddits been there for a month. They edit the lists after subs are banned, but some of them were highly likely to be banned anyway.
1 raulssorban 2018-09-12
Are they reddit terrorists or actually do something useful
1 Inthepaddedroom 2018-09-12
Isn't that against reddit's TOS?
1 take-to-the-streets 2018-09-12
It is, and it’s also not happening. Don’t listen to his lies.
1 Rakhoon 2018-09-12
So what is happening then?
1 take-to-the-streets 2018-09-12
N8TheGr8 made a subreddit to troll right wing people. He only updates the list after subreddits are banned. Reddit bans aren’t done through mass flagging like twitter, so how could they even ban subreddits anyway? Right wing people are falling for a troll and it’s very funny.
1 Rakhoon 2018-09-12
What about the subreddits on the list they plan to get banned in the future?
1 take-to-the-streets 2018-09-12
It’s more trolling. They picked subs that are slightly more likely to be banned than others so they might be right in their guess. They’ve edited the lists before anyway, not like it matters.
1 take-to-the-streets 2018-09-12
Told you
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Probably because they were posting progressively violent fantasies against politicians/celebrities and trying to egg each other on without crossing the line.
It was basically playing "I'm not touching you!" With the sites hate speech policies
1 liberal_artist 2018-09-12
Against the wrong politicians, you mean.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
How so?
1 liberal_artist 2018-09-12
r/politics, etc routinely post violent fantasies involving what they would do to trump and republicans.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
So you should have literally TONS of examples, right?
1 liberal_artist 2018-09-12
Keep denying reality.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Please, share your evidence with us.
1 liberal_artist 2018-09-12
Share your evidence that GA violated terms. Oh wait, you can’t. Weird how you hold others to standards that don’t apply to yourself. Please stop feigning ignorance, it’s painfully obvious to everyone but yourself and maybe a few of the braindead, brainwashed goons who follow you. Keep denying what’s obvious, like a foolish ass, so everyone can see. You’re doing wonders for your ideals.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
The burden of proof is in you, buddy
1 liberal_artist 2018-09-12
I can tell from your language that you didn’t come looking for an honest conversation. Have a nice day, pal.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Yeah I wasn't expecting anything convincing
1 liberal_artist 2018-09-12
K
1 MildlyCat 2018-09-12
You haven't been reading about baseball fields and Rand Paul's rough year?
Stop getting your news from r/politics
1 Too_Weird_Too_Rare 2018-09-12
Most of the people who commit political based violence that I read about these days are on the left. Rand paul, the republican baseball game, antifa and their antics. Maxine waters?? All this hate over Trump. Where are the right wingers?? I'm libertarian not right or left.
1 mnothr 2018-09-12
censorship
1 BonkoJanko 2018-09-12
Promotion of violence and frequent linking to child pornography for "research" feel like two good places to start.
1 DK_Pooter 2018-09-12
/r/TheBanout2018
​
A concerted effort by a bunch of "power mods"
​
btw, that sub is absolute cancer, looks like something straight out of north korea
1 tmogmo 2018-09-12
It seems their ideology aligns with EA's design team... yet they boycott their games, lol.
The mods/admins behind these mass bannings should get together with EA and have a spirit cookout. They can have one giant transgender orgy. They should also invite those journalists who write racist articles about the indigenous European race.
1 Cyclone109 2018-09-12
They were doxing people with the help of the mods even when that person was being sent death threats by their members, “Q” was also directly referencing that sub, just got all too dangerous, some random cunt was being allowed to radicalise people
1 magzy4 2018-09-12
We were over the target
1 Lt_Bear13 2018-09-12
This is a possible reason but it just got downvoted to zero below a thousand posts so I'll re-paste it here:
Lt_Bear13 • 8m I was checking out TopMindsOfReddit and they are claiming anything Q related was banned because these people who were getting accused of being 'pizzagate' are getting death threats. I wonder if there is anything to this? I'm currently looking into it. (P.S. I know topmindsof reddit is an anti-conspiracy reddit. I check out their sources, arguments, and posts; even though I find them rude and immature.)
"SkynetJusticeWarri0rI downvote first, ask questions later. • 1h
This is just one reason why the QAnon subs got banned. On the 12th of August a user on 8Chan posted a vague and cryptic message linking a satirical twitter account to a "global network of baby eating demonic pedophiles". But this wasn't just any 8Chan user, radicalized reddit users consider this to be "drop" from "QAnon" a person they believe to a prophet.
This message exploded through the QAnon network on reddit, where the movement is primarily based. This 'message from Q' was by design an incendiary bomb that was to be widely disseminated to the “Q believers”. This directly lead to owner of the twitter account being targeted and receiving hundreds of threatening messages sent by Q followers.
If you think that QAnon has nothing to do with Reddit. Then you would be gravely mistaken. r/Greatawakening is of such importance to the “Q Movement” that they were directly referenced by “QAnon” in the most recent “drop”.
These subs are becoming more radicalized and more emboldened every day. They openly mark their harassment as “Q sent me”. This hysteria is escalating, and it won’t stop until someone is dead. QAnon is Pizzagate, and it is as every bit as hysterical, deranged and dangerous. The QAnon subreddits are extremist training grounds. They not only promote the radicalization of their users, but unapologetically incite them to commit violent acts. This incendiary bomb was heavily promoted on several subreddits.
The reddit QAnon platform on reddit resulted in the twitter user “S8n” receiving 200+ threats from enraged Q “cultists”. This harassment can be easily found on his twitter account.
We at the TMoR have confirmed that u/itss8n the owner of the @s8n twitter account that was targeted, and he personally reported the harassment to the moderators of the main QAnon subreddit r/GreatAwakening, but they refused to remove the offending post claiming there was "no evidence" of the user being harassed. Instead they deleted his posts begging them to remove their multiple stickied threads about him, even though he explicitly stated he was receiving threats. They then officially then encouraged further harassment, and also provided an article containing his personal details.
Let me repeat that: they shared his personal details – when they knew he was getting death threats from their own users.
u/itss8n : Leave me alone. - REMOVED BY THEIR MODS. u/itss8n : “I got harassed all day yesterday being accused of being a fucking child sex trafficker... do you have any idea what that’s fucking like, to be accused of something so vile because of a 3 year old tweet about a fucking PIZZA. Do you realise how insane that sounds.” - REMOVED BY THEIR MODS. incite : to move to action : stir up : spur on : urge on
Examples of incite in a Sentence
The news incited widespread fear and paranoia.
the rock band's failure to show up incited a riot, as the crowd had waited for hours
You don't have to explicitly direct people to action, in order to "incite" them. Implying that someone is being a satanic pedophile who murders children and part of an unholy opposition is a direct incitement to violence.
Did the "Q" Post incite users into send death threats. Demonstrably, yes it did.
Did those subs promote a message proven to incite their users into making violent threats. Demonstrably, yes it did.
Did those subs refuse to remove the offending threads after being informed that the user was received death threats, yes they are still promoting these threads.
This message stickied and promoted by the QAnon subs provably directly led to death threats and harassment. And yet none of these subs removed the offending posts.
We have contacted the mods of these subreddits, but with the indisputable proof, but prior to their banning, all of these posts were still publicly available. The only response we received was from the Mods of The_GreatAwakening who told me that caring about death threats made me “of no value to society”. And the mods of GreatAwakening muted me.
r/GreatAwakening
1859: Satan twitter account Q:1859"This Twitter acct was referenced for a very specific reason. HOLDS many 'questionable' messages from people of power/influence. These accounts are run by BIG NAMES."
INTERESTING Satan twitter.com/s8n - various references
Results to investigation into subscribers claim of receiving "death threats" because of Qdrop #1859 Q!!mG7VJxZNCI
Satan Twitter account is run by a 24 year old. Q... what the hell? Pun intended.
These subs were also involved in the harassment:
r/the_GreatAwakening
Q Post 1859 - "Satan" Twitter account: I miss you son @realDonaldTrump Q: This Twitter acct was referenced for a very specific reason. HOLDS many 'questionable' messages from people of power/influence. These accounts are run by BIG NAMES. Q1859 @s8n - some names s8n instagram followers r/DrainTheSwamp
Patriots! We have the enemy scared and scurrying to delete any incriminating tweets from bad actors. I urge you all to DIG. We need to know who our enemies are. Find the tweets and expose them! ThanQ
Q posted this Account asked who was in control of these people and it’s obvious it’s Satan~ ~ Pray People ~ if you see Satan you can’t deny God ~ and God loves you!!
Similar posts:
An open letter to the Reddit Admins: Why don't you take death threats seriously? The Mods of r/GreatAwakening stickied a post calling for the targeted harassment of a twitter user. The result? Hundreds of threats sent directly to the user. When the individual directly reported the harassment to them, they claimed there was "no evidence”… Here is proof of 100+ threats. Don’t let the r/The_Donald and r/conspiracy distance themselves from QAnon and Qult. They are complicit in the explosion of hysteria and stupidity. They believe pretty much the exact same conspiracies and everything they read on 4chan. [Huge Effortpost] I've documented the harassment/doxxing campaign of /r/GreatAwakening users against the twitter user @S8n. I believe this is an intentional act of malice perpetuated by the mods there. I implore you guys to read and report this to the Admins. EDIT: Updated the context of this comment"
/r/TopMindsOfReddit/comments/9faf2z/comment/e5vm8fb
.
1 Kittens_n_stuff 2018-09-12
They are falling over themselves to justify what is fundamentally a blatant act of censorship. I could likewise argue that support of Hillary is a cult as believers refuse to even acknowledge that uranium 1 ever happened, and this deluded cult leads to punch a Nazi campaigns and antifa. Hillary called trump supporters deplorables, and the words from one of those post “You don't have to explicitly direct people to action, in order to "incite" them.” We really need to ban all left wing subreddits to put an end to violence in our streets and people being physically attacked for their choice of hat
1 Herculius 2018-09-12
Exactly. You could find plenty of people accusing regular folks of being genocidal Nazis and wishing death upon them and Trump and all that kind of crazy shit.
Also, like gamergate, people use "death threats" to silence the people they don't like when they in actuality sent the the threat to themselves.
I disagree with the Q premise generally speaking but they weren't violent or even particularly aggressive verbally from what I saw.
1 sr0me 2018-09-12
Jesus fuck these people are insane
1 heresmything 2018-09-12
F
1 PressFBot 2018-09-12
F
1 guesswhostrack 2018-09-12
I
1 Krabban 2018-09-12
Finally
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
To all of you who were screaming "Q is a larp" "Q is controlled opposition," please explain why they would ban a larper or controlled opposition?
1 heresmything 2018-09-12
Because they broke the rules? Even larping doesn’t put you above the rules in the reddit sandbox.
1 PoopSwatches 2018-09-12
What rules were broken?
1 EuropeanObiWan 2018-09-12
I go on there at basically all hours of the day and I've never seen anything that warrants an abrupt banning of this nature.
1 PoopSwatches 2018-09-12
Same here.
1 Krabban 2018-09-12
How do you know it was abrupt? For all we know the admins have been in contact with the sub mods for weeks/months. In the majority of cases with banned subs the admins have been trying to get the mods to take action for a while but nothing changes, eventually resulting in a ban.
1 EuropeanObiWan 2018-09-12
Well I'm going to go ahead and assume that this large scale banning of subs didn't involve meticulous discussions with the mods of each one. But yeah, fair point I guess..
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
They weren't, i was a mod for a bit. and on discord there was a constant push to maintain a tight ship for JUST this reason.
1 jiggawatts214 2018-09-12
No warnings given. No notice. No declarations.
​
Instead: Quick / Swift execution.
1 Beauty_Berry 2018-09-12
Same! I never saw any calls for violence! Just the opposite!
1 KneadThePeople 2018-09-12
Liar.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
No, they didn't.
1 Furt_III 2018-09-12
Personally have reported comments that broke the rules on there myself, with them not being taken down later. Yeah, there was a lot of rule breaking.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
I think you're making that up. Screenshots?
1 Furt_III 2018-09-12
Oh yeah I totally keep screenshots of comments I report that were made 3 weeks ago. It wasn't shit like "we should kill people" it was usually for dog whistles for "action".
Either way right now in this thread it's me saying "I've seen it" and you saying "I haven't seen it".
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
In other words, no one actually broke the rules.
1 Furt_III 2018-09-12
I'm providing just as much evidence as you are.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Lashing out at other people because you can't prove your claim?
1 Furt_III 2018-09-12
Lashing out?
1 Buy_The-Ticket 2018-09-12
That is literally what you are doing? How do you not see that? amazing
1 Fooomanchu 2018-09-12
So a few comments means a sub will get banned? Funny how r/ politics is still around then... constant calls for violence against the President and Republicans.
1 Furt_III 2018-09-12
No there has to be some semblance of accountability from the mods, an effort to curb it. I'm presuming that's what got them.
1 Fooomanchu 2018-09-12
By that measure, r/ politics should be banned right alongside with them. Right?
1 Furt_III 2018-09-12
I don't subscribe to politics.
1 Furt_III 2018-09-12
https://www.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/comments/9fbvev/what_were_rmilliondollarextreme/
Looks like it was because the mods were doing it.
1 AutoModerator 2018-09-12
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 Fooomanchu 2018-09-12
Nothing in that link says that the mods were doing it.
1 Furt_III 2018-09-12
https://np.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/comments/9fbvev/what_were_rmilliondollarextreme/e5vayl9/
1 Fooomanchu 2018-09-12
Sounds like the mods were addressing the issue. A far cry from what you are claiming.
Meanwhile on r/ politics... a daily occurrence: https://i.imgur.com/6NRsGT0.jpg
Do you agree that r/ politics should be banned?
1 Furt_III 2018-09-12
https://www.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/comments/9fbvev/what_were_rmilliondollarextreme/e5vbwp7/
1 AutoModerator 2018-09-12
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 Fooomanchu 2018-09-12
I'll take your silence as a yes then.
All subs, like r/ politics, who incite violence should be banned.
1 Furt_III 2018-09-12
Are you even looking into my sources? It all very clearly shows dozens of links pointing toward hard evidence of the mods Doxxing someone.
1 Fooomanchu 2018-09-12
Funny how you won't answer a simple question.
Do you agree that other subs like r/ politics, who call for violence on a daily basis, should also be banned?
1 Furt_III 2018-09-12
There's a point of contention here.
1 qoa 2018-09-12
Dude 80% of that sub was people who were 50+ and barely knew how to use the internet. A lot of the posts were essentially email forwards from grandma. Everyone once in a while there would be a "drop" and then serious posting would happen. 12 hours later it was back to praying (literally) and pictures of Q boomer crafts. They even shouted down partisan talk as the concept was "wake people up to corruption". If there was talk of violence it was shills making it look that way.
1 RealLifePolygamist 2018-09-12
The people posting there say stupid things.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
I was there all the time. Anything that could have possibly gotten reddit into legal trouble led to an immediate ban.
1 jacoby_washing 2018-09-12
How are you seeing their login history?
1 fuckeverywhoreson 2018-09-12
A ridiculous belief can gather some quite non-ridiculous vitriol and violence under its flag. See <insert any religion/cult of your fancy>.
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
Says somebody posting in r/conspiracy
1 Etoiles_mortant 2018-09-12
Why wouldn't they ban him from 4/8chan?
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
They did ban him from 4chan. They don't control 8 chan.
1 Etoiles_mortant 2018-09-12
And you know "they" don't control 8chan, because...?
1 MatrixDream 2018-09-12
always define They
1 jmillsbo 2018-09-12
That's such a weird question. It's like asking "If the Muslim God isn't real then why was Bin Laden killed".
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
No, it isn't. It makes perfect sense. If it was controlled opposition, they wouldn't instruct reddit to ban them, and would probably instruct reddit to make sure they were not banned. Since they were banned, we can infer a high probability that it is not controlled opposition.
You sound an awful lot like the other damage control comments in here, including the admins slapping gold on people literally attacking the sub.
1 BASEDME7O 2018-09-12
You have an extremely poor grasp on basic logic
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Not an argument.
1 Corsham 2018-09-12
Your argument works either way. It's an absurd premise that can only be proven in support of Q knowing everything or whatever exactly it is. There is no evidence that could even hypothetically prove you wrong because it's always part of a 'grand plan'.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
What?
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
I think he's insulting Q. Let's burn his steak.
1 ja734 2018-09-12
Youre right that the idea that q is controlled opposition is nonsense. The idea that q is either a larp or deliberate pro trump disinformation is not nonsense however.
1 NaturalSelectorX 2018-09-12
Where is the evidence Reddit was "instructed" to do anything? Your premise is problematic.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Their shutdown of all Q related subs.
1 NaturalSelectorX 2018-09-12
That happened, but what's the evidence that there was instruction by a third party? Keep in mind I'm not starting from the position that the "deep state" is concerned with random Reddit users.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Proximity in time and type of content being removed.
You should see that hate mail I get.
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
Because GA was a disturbingly racist subreddit, a hot bed of terrorism and housed pedophiles galore.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Lol. Do they kick puppies, too?
1 letsmakemistakes 2018-09-12
They were pretty obsessed with talking about eating babies, so maybe
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
You tell me babyeater
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Lol. Get the fuck out of r/conspiracy.
1 ShellOilNigeria 2018-09-12
Removed. Rule 10.
1 FlaminEddy 2018-09-12
umm GA was very vocally anti pedophile, and anti terrorism.
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
It was anti left wing pedophile. Not a word against right wing or Catholic pedophiles.
That's not anti pedophile. That's anti left wing by any means necessary.
1 FlaminEddy 2018-09-12
They talked about catholic pedophiles quite a bit with regards to current events surrounding the Vatican. They were anti terror in regards to all terrorists. explain how it was a hotbed of domestic terrorism.
1 RealLifePolygamist 2018-09-12
Yeah, so anti pedophilia that the mods once made a sticky telling people to stop posting links to child porn lmao
1 FlaminEddy 2018-09-12
You guys sure do love to take things out of context.
1 GoogleMuh 2018-09-12
Yea that’s some bullshit
1 rergina 2018-09-12
They didn't ban Q, they banned a subreddit discussing him. They also banned the previous one, r/CBTS_stream 6 months ago. r/CBTS_stream had 20k users, r/greatawakening had 60k users. If the intent was to ban all discussion of Q, I'm not sure why they would wait 6 months and let the group grow 3 times larger before banning it.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
You don't understand why they would wait until it was starting to reach critical mass and then send everyone home to start over again?
1 rergina 2018-09-12
Not really. If it was a danger, it would have made more sense to break things up before they got big. By letting it grow it allowed people to create relationships offsite and other sites for discussion/research. 60k people with a similar interest can regroup elsewhere (guessing Voat?), though will likely lose a lot. 2/3k people with a similar interest that get their community frequently broken up will find it hard to regroup.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Again, they don't give a fuck about conscious people getting together. They let me post the deepest darkest secrets in mid-size subs without much trouble. The threat is when you get a large enough number that the barely conscious join in and the unconscious start to wake up. Which is exactly what is happening with Q anon right now.
1 rergina 2018-09-12
Then why aren't they banning threads like this? Or the 5 other submissions about this subject on the front page of /r/conspiracy? Or the comments in the thread that mention alternatives. It seems like a very noisy way to shut down discussion that will draw a lot of attention, as well as convince Q believers that MSM is censoring him out of fear.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
They sent in a bunch of shills, vote bots, and an admin throwing around gold.
1 5dreality 2018-09-12
That makes perfect sense
1 kittyhistoryistrue 2018-09-12
They bannned ALL subs discussing it.
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
Because maybe having a group of people who call for the arrests and military trial of notable politicians and business leaders on the basis that they're all pedophilic cannibalistic satan worshippers is a bad look to advertisers and the general public.
1 Fooomanchu 2018-09-12
Seems like Reddit is fine with people calling for violence against the President though. Hmmmmmm.
1 Dwighty1 2018-09-12
Because the nutjobs believing it was inciting violence and harassing people.
1 anonymoushero1 2018-09-12
This is the stupidest comment I have seen in months.
1 ilovecfb 2018-09-12
Imagine taking reddit this seriously
lmao
1 fuckeverywhoreson 2018-09-12
Surprised it didn't happen earlier. The veiled threats and the occasional "can't wait for the killing to start"-type posts being lauded, couldn't have worked in their favor.
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
never happened, nice try concern trolling
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
Happened daily
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
Probably from people like you who then immediately report it to the admins :)
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
I hope so.
1 deauxstroie 2018-09-12
Ghhhhheeeeeeey
1 CladdyPalm 2018-09-12
You a regular?
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
To r/top page 4? Sure
1 deleteme123 2018-09-12
Evidence/screenshots should be plenty, then. Care to provide some?
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
Ben Garrison posts.
James Woods posts.
Support of Trump.
Linking to breitbart.
Pretty sure daily stormer was a feature.
Ben Shapiro.
Tucker Carlson.
1 JeffFarty 2018-09-12
lmfao, literally none of this is banworthy you child
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
I didn't argue it was I said it supported racists, racist ideals, and promoted racism. Which is ban worthy. These are but a few examples from last week
1 JeffFarty 2018-09-12
You were asked to provide evidence that this "happens every day" and your evidence is Breitbart articles and Ben Garrison cartoons? Get the fuck out of here.
1 pinkmaybebabycrazy 2018-09-12
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/9fczd4/rgreatawakening_had_to_go_but_theres_no_reason/e5vo8cw/
1 FurryPhilosifer 2018-09-12
I lurked the sub for a laugh, and I saw it a LOT. That place was horrific.
1 JeffFarty 2018-09-12
amazing how not one screenshot of any nefarious activity has been provided, despite all of these claims
1 pinkmaybebabycrazy 2018-09-12
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/9fczd4/rgreatawakening_had_to_go_but_theres_no_reason/e5vo8cw/
1 Kelemvor_LB 2018-09-12
...and that's what gaslighting looks like, if anyone needed an example.
1 KneadThePeople 2018-09-12
Those posts did not exist. Any calls for violence were removed immediately upon reporting.
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
Direct ones, surely yes. The rest stayed up.
1 DeepPast 2018-09-12
Luckily for you you can make such bullshit claims now because it’s all gone.
If Q is such bullshit, why would you hang around the sub long enough to know what sort of things were being discussed?
“Because it’s hilarious”... save it. You must be a really sad soul.
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
Because its on page 4 of r/top which I frequent more often than I like to admit.
1 DeepPast 2018-09-12
You can filter it. Instead you prefer to silence those you disagree with.
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
I filtered the Donald, because that was hatred and vitriol. GA was more polite-yet-subtle racism and sad cringe.
1 dankweeddoe 2018-09-12
All you have to do is look through someone post history and you will find vile trash.
/u/Z0MGbies > Finally! Fuck those racist cunts. posted to TUMOR.
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
I stand by that comment that... I made a couple of hours ago? Fuck the racist cunts of GA. Find something that is baf
1 dankweeddoe 2018-09-12
How are they racist?
1 eaglejm 2018-09-12
No one wanted killing to start just fair justice in a court of law.
1 fuckeverywhoreson 2018-09-12
Uhuh.
1 CladdyPalm 2018-09-12
Nice comeback with solid evidence
1 dankweeddoe 2018-09-12
Where does it say killing?
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
https://archive.is/PS5P7
That wasn't that hard to find.
1 dankweeddoe 2018-09-12
Did you even read what you linked too? Where the fuck does it say killing? Doesn't anywhere in there..
1 WrestlingWithMadness 2018-09-12
They were celebrating the fact that McCain was executed in a secret tribunal.
1 whacko_jacko 2018-09-12
If he actually committed treason, then why would that not be celebrated? There was always a baseline understanding that they better have really fucking solid proof and videotaped confessions to boot if they are going as far as secret tribunals. In the end though, that's something UCMJ is supposed to be used for if it is being used in the context of war against a legitimate threat to our nation, e.g. a secret global criminal cabal infiltrating the US system.
1 WrestlingWithMadness 2018-09-12
You dont see any issue of a secret tribunal executing a former war hero and person who ran for president of the country?
Executing people in complete secrecy is to be celebrated with absolutely zero proof?
FFS.
1 whacko_jacko 2018-09-12
That depends entirely on the classified evidence presented in the tribunal. If he's done something truly heinous and committed treason and they have the proof, then I don't care what kind of image he has.
Notice how everything I'm saying is hypothetical?
If it can be proven that there was a treasonous plot to overthrow the American system, and if it can be proven that people like John McCain or George (W) Bush or Barrack Obama were complicit, then I really don't care what methods they use to stop them. This is all if they are able to prove they were acting out of necessity. In times of war, the President actually does get Constitutional authority to bend the rules in pretty much any way.
The celebration is all hypothetical based on the premise that the truth will be revealed to the public and it will be undeniable, e.g. videotaped confessions and more. UCMJ has a pretty high standard of evidence. They just don't fuck around once they have established treason.
If it turns out that they did these secret things with flimsy evidence, even the most hardcore Q follower would be in the streets protesting.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-09-12
Literally never happened. Went there every single day since its inception.
1 Luvke 2018-09-12
Also went there everyday, place was rife with those sorts of posts.
1 vince1217 2018-09-12
No it wasn’t what the fuck? This is a blatant lie. I watched that sub grow 60k subscribers and not once did I see that shit.
1 Weareone2 2018-09-12
Dude they’re on this sub and posting their insane nonsense. GA is down AND we have nothing now but people making shit up about it.
1 vince1217 2018-09-12
Yeah like Q said attack’s with get worse and come from all directions. Smart move by the deep state to basically cut our comms and now push the narrative we are violent so we can’t defend ourselves.
If this isn’t a fucking Q proof I don’t know what is.
1 Weareone2 2018-09-12
Oh it is. I’m now a full believer. This is insane.
1 ShannonCash 2018-09-12
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/9fczd4/rgreatawakening_had_to_go_but_theres_no_reason/e5vo8cw/
Source with many bad examples. I perused the sub after McCain died, I was shocked at what they had to say about "no name" as they called him.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-09-12
Nah, it just wasn't man.
1 timstolt1 2018-09-12
I have frequently checked in on that sub, and didn't see any significant threats. Not even close to what you see in feminist or "fuck the alt right" subs.
I honestly believe that larp or not, the lefties in charge simply did not want the sentiments of that sub being contagious.
1 wlc 2018-09-12
I dunno... I didn't frequent it but I did visit sometimes out of curiosity. There were definitely posts calling for death to certain people (Hillary, Obama [or Hussein as they started calling him], McCain [who they started calling 'no name'] prior to him dying, etc)
1 timstolt1 2018-09-12
Funny, I never saw that. I'm sure reddit has records. Does archive.org or .is work with reddit?
Moreover, what about r/fuckthealtright ?...and the things they say?
1 wlc 2018-09-12
Those sites work if someone archived it. Other sites like removeddit and ceddit don't seem to be displaying anything.
As for that other sub, I don't know anything about it but from a quick glance it definitely doesn't look like a healthy sub. Unlike GA, it doesn't look worth reading.
1 NotBloodyLikely 2018-09-12
I don’t get this line of thinking. The alt-right has taken a stance with actual nazis, we have to be intolerant of intolerance. Q-guys are advocating violence against people because of conspiracy theories. You can’t equate those two. In my opinion, someone who advocates for violence against others due to race, creed, etc deserves to be punched more than someone who “maybe did something” because you played detective and strung together a bunch of random shit to fit your narrative. Not that I see that type of talk on r/FuckTheAltRight anyways, just saying that if I did, I understand it more.
1 Herculius 2018-09-12
No they weren't. Talking about indictments "around the corner" or even military tribunals, however misguided it may be, is not a "call or incitement of violence. They were talking about political and legal processes they think will happen or would like to see happen. That isn't advocating anyone go murder or inflict criminal violence on anyone.
1 NotBloodyLikely 2018-09-12
I saw plenty of comments on there related to stockpiling weapons in prep for what they seemed to think is a coming civil war and hanging politicians for deep-state related treason. THAT’S what I’m referring to. And that’s why they were banned.
1 Herculius 2018-09-12
Putting aside for a second that you can easily find crazies who say stupid shit on any subreddit and particularly political subs.
That explanation flies out the window when you look at the list of subs they banned. They even banned Q subs with only two people allowed to submit (meaning there were exactly zero offending posts).
1 pinkmaybebabycrazy 2018-09-12
Someone gave quite a few examples in another thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/9fczd4/rgreatawakening_had_to_go_but_theres_no_reason/e5vo8cw/
1 amlecciones 2018-09-12
anecdotes won't work. % will. anyone have that as a % of all topics discussed. otherwise many subreddits fall into the category to be banned.
1 deleteme123 2018-09-12
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Where's your evidence? Where are your screenshots?
1 Spartan1117 2018-09-12
A Q supporter asking for extraordinary evidence for an extraordinary claim. The irony is too much.
1 deleteme123 2018-09-12
Ad hominem much.
1 Ce-Jay 2018-09-12
If those comments got it banned we should see LateStageCapitalism banned soon right?
1 absolutedesignz 2018-09-12
Isn't LSC much more nebulous?
1 Ce-Jay 2018-09-12
There was a post on the front page the other day that called for CEO's to be beheaded.
1 absolutedesignz 2018-09-12
Do you mean the one that said that janitors like CEOs and the replying Tweeter saying they don't want to decapitate janitors?
1 Ce-Jay 2018-09-12
That's the one!
1 Covefe_Anon 2018-09-12
Dude. Never has a “I can’t wait for the killing to start.” Been posted. That had to be one of the best and honestly moderated subs with any “conspiracy” relation. I went there because it was more realistic than the forum sliding and utter garbage going on in this sub. This sub, used to promote freedom of thought, now its mostly and purposely right wing/alt right to support a made up theory that only the right = conspiracy theories.
The great awakening, even if it was a larp, banded a group of honest, independently thinking, and justice wanting individuals, who PROMOTED not being violent.
That is more dangerous to those in charge than us being excited for the FISA to drop. The FISA doesn’t even compare to comradery of nonviolent vigilance and promotion of the freedom to think differently.
WWG1WGA
1 pinkmaybebabycrazy 2018-09-12
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/9fczd4/rgreatawakening_had_to_go_but_theres_no_reason/e5vo8cw/
1 Fooomanchu 2018-09-12
Never saw any posts like that.
1 fuckeverywhoreson 2018-09-12
[List courtesy of another poster.]
https://archive.is/OlQYB
https://archive.is/2dbbY
https://archive.is/QraZZ
https://archive.is/g7ap2
https://archive.is/uYuDp
https://archive.is/HM9P5
https://archive.is/w3OEN
https://archive.is/mkttv
https://archive.is/y88Gb
https://archive.is/YMs5x
https://archive.is/opNuT
https://archive.is/0RM6V
https://archive.is/P8rVD
1 Fooomanchu 2018-09-12
So then I presume you also agree that r/ politics should be banned?
Similar comments (like this: https://i.imgur.com/6NRsGT0.jpg) are posted there on a daily basis.
1 Herculius 2018-09-12
There's worse than that on many subs too.
Check out subs like r/anarchism and r/latestagecapitalism for a good laugh/cry. You'll have people there talk about murdering "elites" all the fucking time (by elites they mean anyone with more money than them)
1 Fooomanchu 2018-09-12
Thanks for the info. The selective enforcement of these bans is disturbing.
1 FUCK_THE_TAL_SHIAR 2018-09-12
Here's a screenshot of a particularly bad one in politics I took a year or so ago: https://image.ibb.co/iWsspy/20180629_083150.png
Now, I'm not a Trump supporter, or a supporter of any politician, but after Trump won, I started taking tons of screenshots of the blatant incitement of violence and harassment against Trump/Trump supporters on politics and various other subreddits.
Anyway, that one was one of the worst and made my stomach feel like a pit of snakes knowing actual people think this way, regardless of who its about.
1 Papa-Walrus 2018-09-12
Ah, yes. Comments with 0, 1, or 2 points. Truly representative of one of the largest subs on reddit.
1 Fooomanchu 2018-09-12
I only looked for about 30 seconds. Have some more.
http://archive.is/30oOP Endorsing “dropping bodies”
http://archive.is/7xKxO "What degree of illegal is it to kill the president elect?"
http://archive.is/GDnoy "Alright CIA, this American citizen is okay with the "Kennedy treatment"
http://magaimg.net/img/61s6.png “I’d get rid of the Christians in a heartbeat”
https://i.imgur.com/sFyJTGU.jpg I’ve got my bat ready to go to knock Maga hats off heads”
https://i.redd.it/6nyohk2ump901.png I’d love to see dems start dropping these Fuckers, Beat the old men to death
https://imgur.com/vSEEoIi I would support the assassination of members of Congress who voted yes
https://imgur.com/qyLiTtY If congress does nothing I say need for violent and blood revolution
https://imgur.com/DjV1RCV (Of congress)Their house should be burned to the ground
https://i.redd.it/z9yotzwl6ea11.png Any two Republicans go down, they can’t seat judge, Everybody knows how to stop them
https://i.redd.it/my7v9r48n9dy.png Hopefully the CIA offs Bannon
https://i.redd.it/txcqjlq1br9z.jpg Kushner should be executed for treason, All Americans defending him traitors
https://i.reddituploads.com/b0a9bf644fbe4351b77607c71e3c3ab2?fit=max&h=1536&w=1536&s=4e4c566c70cd137d1ae5b3a7ae0cf186 Endorsing destruction of Trump supporters property
http://archive.is/ggsdO I'm encouraging people to buy rifles so they can resist Trump when he comes for you
1 Papa-Walrus 2018-09-12
Yes, these comments with hidden scores and responses arguing against them are definitely representative of the sub as a whole.
1 Fooomanchu 2018-09-12
I'm glad we agree.
1 eaglejm 2018-09-12
Beyond furious. They didn't violate any rules and were a tight ship.
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
Delusion. They violated them all the time, just more low-key than the Donald.
I was reporting posts for racism daily. Not out of vendetta, purely because they were just so racist
1 mythof1886 2018-09-12
Fuck off, TMOR scum
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
This is why you got banned
1 mythof1886 2018-09-12
I've never participated on any of those banned subs.
1 IDGAFifigetbanned 2018-09-12
What did he say?
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
I'm honestly not sure / can't remember / can't see on my feed. Definitely nothing sensational, best guess was a denial of the racism or some cliche derogatory remark.
1 ShellOilNigeria 2018-09-12
Removed. Rule 10.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-09-12
Nah, I was there every day. That shit simply never happened.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-09-12
Nah, I was there every day. That shit simply never happened.
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
It did. I saw a posting of a Ben Garrison cartoon just last week. And James Woods tweets. Both racist fucks.
1 saxmaster 2018-09-12
So they posted a racist cartoon by Ben Garrison? I've never seen one. Please enlighten me.
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
You've never seen them post Ben Garrison so I have to enlighten you? What?
1 saxmaster 2018-09-12
A racist cartoon by Garrison. I've never seen one.
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
Then you've never seen a cartoon by him. or you yourself are racist.
Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4
1 BurnerPerkins 2018-09-12
A couple fakes there.
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
And you knew Garrison enough to know which are the fakes? That's telling.
1 BurnerPerkins 2018-09-12
No, I googled it, because I don’t just look at some random post on Reddit (or the news, or social media) and blindly believe it without doing my own research.
I am a responsible and intelligent adult person.
1 saxmaster 2018-09-12
Clearly facts and evidence don't matter, anyone who disagrees politically is a racist. If you question that you're racist. Blah blah.
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
Why are you minimising such a sick fuck like Garrison and passing blatant racism off as "political difference"?
1 saxmaster 2018-09-12
You call him a racist. I ask for proof. You provide fake evidence. This is the part where you either come up with real evidence or concede the point.
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
The non fake posts. I could concede the universe it wouldn't change empirical facts
1 saxmaster 2018-09-12
The fact that you don't know which ones are real, are too lazy to find out, but still insist on casually dehumanizing someone speaks volumes. Calling everything and everyone racist without justification is foolish blind hatred. You're just projecting your fear and ignorance onto the rest of the world. Stop it.
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
Racism is an extension of xenophobia buddy. There's your fear and ignorance.
As long as at least one is real, it shows he's racist. And the fact you think otherwise shows your racist. I'd say remove yourself from the gene pool, but I suspect you already have done so involuntarily.
1 saxmaster 2018-09-12
The first comic is the only real one. It was posted in November 2015, the month of the Paris terror attacks which claimed 130 lives. Around this time Obama was being criticized for pulling support from moderate allies like Ghadaffi and Mubarak, and for helping radical jihadists in Syria, who ultimately planned the attacks. Garrison was standing up to radical bullies and criticizing Obama's foreign policy. But you didn't know that because I must be ignorant.
The others three are made by rebellious teens on 4chan who delight in tossing poisonous breadcrumbs to starved social justice warriors like yourself. The sad thing is, no one really hates anyone more than the left hates the right. Your hatred is for the people you live and work with on a daily basis, who happen to have a problem with having their free speech curtailed by people who cry while bullying you into silence.
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
RDI of Hannity and Tucker Carlson exceeded.
At best, the Obama one is hiding behind the bullshit narrative you just espoused in order to be a dog whistle to racists like yourself.
I've seen examples like all of these posted on TheDonald and GA plenty of times. So we've concluded that GA and TheDonald are racist AND perpetuate fake news (breaking news!!!), and that Ben Garrison is their homeboy.
IDK about you but if a bunch of red neck racists were supporting the things I was doing, I would think twice about what it is I'm doing.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-09-12
Oh lordy...
1 blackbutters 2018-09-12
It's only racism if white people do it. Lel.
1 Annies_Boobs 2018-09-12
Imagine being “beyond furious” that a larp sub on reddit was banned.
I wish I could spend my energy on dumb shit like that.
1 HuskyLivesMatter 2018-09-12
Imagine sucking spez cock so much that you are in favor of censorship. So many calls for violence happen every day in politics and it reigns supreme. This is clearly political censorship.
1 Annies_Boobs 2018-09-12
You wanna come over for some tendies and Mountain Dew, sport?
Reddit is super serious business, I know.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-09-12
Wow, hundreds or articles and mass censorship, all for a larp.
1 ShiftlessElement 2018-09-12
This is what I don’t get, If there truly “above the target” what is the point of these coded communications anyway? Why care that the sub is shutdown, if it’s all happening “soon”? Why the need to “red pill” everyone around you, if the truth is about to be revealed?
It’s clearly a need to feel special and important. From a logistical stand point, the existence of the sub never made any sense.
1 Krabban 2018-09-12
Q predicted this.
1 fuckeverywhoreson 2018-09-12
Truly, only a prophet could know.
​
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
Yeah what a crazy prediction. /s
1 Too_Weird_Too_Rare 2018-09-12
That murderous attitude might indeed engulf some on the 'right' but at this moment the 'left' is far more hateful and vengeful in physical reality because of their hate for trump, which has been programmed into them by the media just like WMD's and "Osama did it". Mainstream democrat politicans are calling for conservatives to be harassed on the streets (Maxine waters). Rand Paul was physically attacked by someone on the 'left.' Antifa hits people with bike locks and their own poop. People wearing Trump hats are open targets for harassment. Are you on the 'left' so you're okay with it or don't notice it? Even half the people in this post, no doubt on the 'left', celebrate censorship because it helps them. No ethics or values.
1 fuckeverywhoreson 2018-09-12
A "righty" drove over and killed someone during a right-wing rally meant to "unite" everything from dull-as-dishwater republicans to outright nazis. 70% of all terrorist attacks in the United States are (still) committed by the extreme right. A bunch of self-proclaimed "crusaders" got their sentencing a few months back, for plotting to massacre a mosque.
The extreme left are loud cunts, undoubtedly, but there's no equivalency between them when it comes to actual violence; much less outright loss of life.
A list terror attacks/murders/spree killings and plots committed by "avowed rightwingers" in recent and not-so-recent years.
1 Too_Weird_Too_Rare 2018-09-12
The guy driving the car was a dick but he inadvertently slammed into an obese woman who had a heart attack. Heart attack was the cause of death. A healthy person could have survived... it doesn't change the severity of it but it's hardly attributable to right wing terrorism. It wasn't targeted. Anyway that entire event was ridiculous however there is a lot more footage of left wing violence from what I can tell.
No doubt right wing assholes did and do shit, f em, but the media exaggeration of trump supporters as dangerous when the left has dealt significantly more political violence as I explained is what concerns me. People don't realize it is the media and both parties that are the enemy to regular people. Trump is what he is but his kind of populism is not evil like it's made out to be. This is what it looks like to have a president not completely controlled by the political parties and media elites. I'm not necessarily a huge fan of him either but damn, I just want consistency. BUT right now it suits many people's needs because censorship and partisan politics are easier than letting the best ideas win in the marketplace of comments.
1 fuckeverywhoreson 2018-09-12
It's interesting how you can grasp the true and factual truth of the former, and still succumb to the BS of the latter. The "murderous lefties are a comin' for you!" is as much of an illusionary scaremongering as "Everyone on the right is a white supremacist nazi spree-killer in waiting!". It's a cynical internet effort to create not only an equivalency, but a weighted imbalance against "the enemy".
Fuck the media: but that doesn't justify employing their same tricks and lies the other way, especially when the detestable (and NON-REPRESENTATIVE) minority on the right is factually by far more of a real problem.
​
[Also, PS: The guy in the car was premeditated. He drove circles to position himself and had spoken about violence against the protesters.
Her heart attack due to the injuries she accrued is no more an "extenuating circumstance" than, say, an elderly person dying "to what a healthy person could have survived" after being stabbed while on anticoagulant heart-medication: or simply beaten with their more brittle physiques. It's an absurd and frightening notion to humor.]
1 lakerswiz 2018-09-12
Where
1 Krabban 2018-09-12
Some of his inane ramblings I suppose, he predicts everything and nothing. I neither read nor follow this stuff, I'm just having fun.
1 Buy_The-Ticket 2018-09-12
Lol nice that made me laugh
1 IAmSumOne 2018-09-12
without this reply for context, I almost downvoted you. Sarcasm is impossible in type, unless maybe we quote it. "Q Predicted This"
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
Did you miss the latest drops? Something was supposed to happen yesterday.
1 lakerswiz 2018-09-12
It didn't.
1 Dwighty1 2018-09-12
In the context of global politics, I am not sure that the banning of a niche forum for hate speach and harassment on a internet message board constitutes "something".
This also happened Today, not Yesterday.
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
"Think mirror. Today is yesterday." As they would say.
1 suprmario 2018-09-12
Well "they" might be mentally challenged...
1 Spartan1117 2018-09-12
Thats how the Q cult works. There is always something that is just about to happen and it always ends up being nothing.
1 aekotra 2018-09-12
11 Sep 2018 - 5:47:55 PM
12 Sep 2018 - 2:45:33 PM
12 Sep 2018 - 3:21:05 PM
1 lakerswiz 2018-09-12
So he never predicted this
Just more vague statements posed as questions you can apply to situations you pick and choose.
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
He did say something BIG was gonna happen soon.
1 Krabban 2018-09-12
Well he says something big is going to happen constantly, in the most vague statements ever. After enough PBR your mind can twist any situation to fit his "predictions".
1 Maverick314 2018-09-12
I've always thought of he/she/them/whatever as basically the pro-Trump version of a horoscope... say a ton of super vague stuff that you can read anything you want into.
1 Etoiles_mortant 2018-09-12
If getting a subreddit banned is "something BIG that is going to happen", I wouldn't put my hope high for other things.
1 Dwighty1 2018-09-12
The banning of a forum for hate speech inhabited by a niche group on a internet message board isn't "big" by any stretch of the imagination.
1 bennysanders 2018-09-12
"He" said that every week for the last year and a half
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
Pretty much yeah.
1 SIGHR 2018-09-12
Yup. he said "this is the calm before the storm" he meant this.
"future proves past" he meant this
"trust the plan" he meant this
if you think im wrong maybe you are right. Q also said "disinfo is necessary"
​
1 Somethingfunny3 2018-09-12
Looks like the hard core censorist left are already taking the beat down in november well.
What they don't realise (or maybe they do) is they are quickly becoming the minority.
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
Utter delusion. To think such racist views are the majority.
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
Utter delusion to associate that sub with racism.
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
It's a racism gateway sub operated by the Klan.
There was racism everyday. Every. fucking. Day.
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
I guess when you want to see something you can. It's been a pretty consistent theme there from Q on down that we're all Americans, that this isn't even a right / left divide issue much less one of race. I've seen plenty of the right / left divide in the community, there were a large number of people on the right that couldn't quite let go of the dislike for liberals and the democrats but there was never a consistent theme of racism.
1 Somethingfunny3 2018-09-12
I've only stopped in there on occasion. If anything they where celebrating the fact that races other than white where coming on board. That is hardly the thinking of racist.
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
They do that, sure. "look how racist we aren't!" and then later "by the way, did you know black people are scary?"
1 vv4rpig 2018-09-12
lol, ok.
1 pliny_the_marble 2018-09-12
If you don't agree, scream racism. You are so predictable.
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
100% not the case. If you get called out for being racist, use fallacies. So predictable.
1 Somethingfunny3 2018-09-12
seriously, not everyone who has different views is a racist, nazi, or Russian.
1 ToddWhiskey 2018-09-12
Unironically, Q's last post (2163) is called: It's Hammer Time
1 rrtangent 2018-09-12
Q is spez confirmed
1 guesswhostrack 2018-09-12
I was expecting parachute pants to make a comeback tbh
1 DancesWithPugs 2018-09-12
They totally are, go out and wear them
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
It was all a trap!
1 ToddWhiskey 2018-09-12
Expand your thinking.
1 thegeneraldisarray 2018-09-12
Trust the plan.
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
It's funny when I can't even tell the mocking and real comments apart.
1 rrtangent 2018-09-12
I think my favorite Q conspiracy theory is that it's a psyop meant to pacify supporters if Donald gets indicted since it's all part of the plan or w/e.
1 luchovzla 2018-09-12
It’s doing a good job of that.
1 y000danon 2018-09-12
I used to love Trump.
Now I think he’s going to Moscow to train Polar Bears for the Russia Circus
1 Joyce_III 2018-09-12
If that's what it is you'd think the Left, Reddit, Gulag, NYT's, etc would be promoting it, not shutting it down.
Think logically.
1 rrtangent 2018-09-12
If everybody in the country except the actual Q followers was in on it, that would be a pretty easily exposed conspiracy. There, thought logically.
1 rivershimmer 2018-09-12
I like to imagine the world 20 years from now. All the details of the Russian collusion are public. The Clintons both died of natural causes, first Bill, than Hillary, surrounded by friends loved ones. They were buried in state, mourned by dignitaries who traveled from the four corners of the globe. As was Michelle Obama, taken too soon, in a plane crash on her way to deliver supplies to survivors of an earthquake. Barack was devastated, but gradually was able to resume his life of service and good deeds, a respected elder statesman, always inspiring.
A disgraced Trump died of natural causes, his legacy a shambles, his abbreviated Presidency serving as a warning for future generations.
The eldest Trump children have served their sentences and live quietly, their reputations ruined. While there was no Trump fortune left after the legal bills for Melania to inherit, she makes a nice living on the talk show circuit; her ghost-written memoirs sold well. Several years after Michelle's death, she reconnected with Obama, and as his large hand enveloped hers in greeting, something sparked. They are seeing each other. Tiffany and Barron are doing well, thriving in fact, as are the Trump grandchildren.
Our nation has healed, for the most part. But still on obscure corners of the Internet live the aging Q crew, still waiting for vengeance on Obama and Clinton, still waiting for vindication for Trump. Still forlorn; still posting to "trust the plan."
1 PreachyVegan 2018-09-12
they are funny either way :)
1 fortfive 2018-09-12
poe's law
1 HelperBot_ 2018-09-12
Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law
HelperBot v1.1 /r/HelperBot_ I am a bot. Please message /u/swim1929 with any feedback and/or hate. Counter: 212309
1 magzy4 2018-09-12
Spez is a carnibal. Part of the swamp
1 rrtangent 2018-09-12
Trust his plan!
1 lnverted 2018-09-12
The only thing Q has ever correctly predicted?
1 ToddWhiskey 2018-09-12
What makes you think that the Q psyop was about 'predictions'?
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Id3C4L18-oc
many many more.
1 ToddWhiskey 2018-09-12
You did not understand what I said. The raison d'être has NOT been to make predictions.
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
Yes, I did a tad...The reason was to wake people up to what's going on behind the scenes and gave people the ability to make "predictions" on when the majority would wake up. Q made statements about future events that became true. And if he's a "larp", those would be considered predictions.
1 ToddWhiskey 2018-09-12
Nah. The ultimate purpose was to find the 100th monkey. Not kidding.
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
That's the MSM
1 ToddWhiskey 2018-09-12
MSM has been used as well I believe, by redpills / breadcrumbs hidden in their (mostly anti-Q) articles which actually help to lessen the psychological blow when the 'normies' get confronted with truth eventually.
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-09-12
Wait what? When?
1 RiseoftheTrumpwaffen 2018-09-12
Don’t try the lengths and logical leaps Qheads go through to bring meaning to his random crap is ridiculous. It makes numerology look legit.
1 luchovzla 2018-09-12
TRUST SESSIONS!!!1
1 mythstified 2018-09-12
Sure, if you discount that he predicted McCain's time of death right down to the hour and minute.
1 getrusednerd 2018-09-12
Are you suggesting he killed McCain?
1 RiseoftheTrumpwaffen 2018-09-12
Here let me show you this chart of random bullshit I made in ms paint that proves Q is a psychic.
1 mythstified 2018-09-12
https://i.redd.it/wdz1o3z1kpi11.png
1 mythstified 2018-09-12
https://i.redd.it/wdz1o3z1kpi11.png
1 getrusednerd 2018-09-12
What is stated here is:
Q made a post about McCain on 8chan exactly one month before McCain's death. Therefore Q knew when McCain was going to die.
Unfortunately because this is such a random and spurious correlation, we need additional narrative such as:
Q knew when McCain was going to die because he is telling us something about McCain is going on behind the scenes and this has been planned to the exact minute for a month.
All this shows is Q made a post about McCain exactly one month before he died. The guy has 2000 posts. Each of those posts has data (time posted, random haikus in text, random picture) like this one and the best they can come up with is the alleged knowledge of McCain's death time. The knowledge is alleged because he never actually calls the death time, it's a post-hoc addition by his fans who have started with a conclusion and are fitting the evidence to it.
This is like that jenny saga a few years ago on reddit, people love the idea of being told a riveting story in real time. Also Q followers really get off on the fact that he talks in haikus because it makes him sound smart.
1 mythstified 2018-09-12
Nice try
Q posts something DIRECTLY about McCain one month to the hour and minute of the death of the same guy. His post says he's returning to the headlines, oh boy did he ever.
Q has said before that timestamps are important
https://qanon.pub/?q=timestamp
Go there if you care for facts.
Could this be a coincidence? of course it could. But what are the odds? Q also said "Every Dog has his Day" and he died one day before Dog Day. Also, McCain died exactly 17 days before 9/11... 17... 17th letter is Q
1 rivershimmer 2018-09-12
And which Q drop was that? And would that McCain's death by natural causes, McCain's execution, McCain's suicide, or McCain's faked death because he's been sentenced to Gitmo by a secret military tribunal? Since Qultists can't seem to settle on his actual fate.
1 mythstified 2018-09-12
You literally dont know what you're talking about. Your conflating theories from Q Researchers to what Q actually drops.
https://i.redd.it/wdz1o3z1kpi11.png
here's the drop
1 rivershimmer 2018-09-12
He didn't predict death. He predicted McCain would be back in the headlines, a terribly vague prediction which has been a pretty safe bet for years now, as McCain is a prominent politician. He also used the nickname NoName, a moniker he reserves for McCain, but should McCain be out of the news and someone else convenient to the narrative in, it would be easy to retrofit the prediction to be about that someone else.
Also, that claim--down to the hour and minute--hinges on McCain's place of death being two hours before EST. However, that image you link up to is wrong: McCain's place of death--his home in Cornville, AZ--is three hours before EST.
1 mythstified 2018-09-12
Thank you for this actually, I wasn't aware that AZ had two different timezones
1 mythstified 2018-09-12
You think you're so clever don't you?
But you're wrong.
https://imgur.com/B5OIGlg
TWO HOUR DELTA not three.
1 rivershimmer 2018-09-12
I think you might be confused because of Daylight Savings Time. In Arizona, only the Navajo Nation observes DST, and Cornville is not there, geographically.
So, if I check what time it is in Cornville right now, as I am writing this, it's 5:24 p.m. In EST, it's 8:24 p.m.
1 mythstified 2018-09-12
And what is it in eDt (which is what the Q post is on) not eSt
1 rivershimmer 2018-09-12
Wait. The actual time we use is not what matters? But the artificial division of time that we have invented for our own convenience, the month, does? 31 days has some significance here which would not be true if the drop had dropped on February 25? How do you decide?
And would you like to address any of my other points? Particularly the one that's about how the drop doesn't actually predict his death?
1 mythstified 2018-09-12
Hey man you can call it coincidence all day long. Q works that way. The strength of his proof is that this is just one of MANY coincidences, with many situations. If you don't think predicting his exact time of death isn't Spooky enough for you then that's up to you. Sure he could be in the headlines for any reason, being a prominent politician and all, except he was the headlines for a week exactly from that time on. That's phenomenal to me.
How'd he know?
Q theory is that he's a massive traitor. He did not go on his own terms. But Q also pissed off the researchers because he said for the stability of the Republic somethings must remain buried. So what really happened to McCain? Did he simply pass away? Not sure. Maybe one day we'll know more.
1 rivershimmer 2018-09-12
I'd be impressed if he'd predicted his exact time of death. If Q had said that John McCain would die at 4:28 Arizona MST on August 25, that I'd be all aboard the Q-train, Q-Q for QQPuffs. That would shock my skeptic sensibilities.
But Q didn't. Instead, Q predicted that No-Name would be returning to headlines. A safe bet when the man was said to be dying, and a safe bet when the John McCain National Defense Authorization Act was up for a vote in the House the day after the Q drop dropped.Were any Q believers posting that this must be what Q predicted?
Remember the flood of headlines on August 13 and 14 when Trump signed the bill into law? Were any Q believers posting that this must be what Q predicted?
It's the oldest fortune teller's trick in the book. Be vague enough that your prediction can be matched to any one of multiple possible outcomes.
Well, then, give me another one, something Q predicted that came to pass, and something that's neither predictable enough (through common sense) nor vague enough to be explained away.
1 rivershimmer 2018-09-12
If Q accurately predicted McCain's death (and see my other reply for why I don't believe this is true), we are left with two possibilities.
Q is a psychic, or a seer, or a prophet, and he gets this information by supernatural means.
McCain's death was planned, down to the date and minute (but not the hour, see my other post for why), for some reason. And scheduled a month out from the drop, for some reason. And hinted at to the general public, for some reason.
None of that makes any sense at all. Whether in the context that McCain was executed, or allowed/forced to commit suicide, or allowed/forced to fake his death. What possible reason could there be for a month's time between the drop and the event?
And that brings me to my next point: Q Researchers (I like the nickname Qultists myself) all have different ideas of what really happened. What possible good is a Q drop that is so vague that nobody can decide what exactly happened? Why is Q sowing so much discord among his followers?
1 mythstified 2018-09-12
https://imgur.com/OIdJkfC
And this is CORRECT
An hour ago I ran the test and MST and MDT were an hour different. Right now I just checked and now they're the exact same fucking time.
Q IS REAL
HE GOT THE TIME 100% EXACT TO THE MINUTE ONE MONTH EARLY
1 Hummingbird1022 2018-09-12
This confirms to me that Q is real!
1 BERNIE2020ftw 2018-09-12
it really shouldnt lol
1 freedom_french_fries 2018-09-12
been happening inside my head?" "Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?
1 crazylegs99 2018-09-12
I'm not familiar with how 4chan works, so I have a stupid question for you. Isn't everything on 4chan anonymous in away that it would be impossible to tell if the same person is making the qanon posts? For example, couldn't anyone post there claiming to be that person without there being a way to tell? I honestly have no idea, so asking for y education.
1 ToddWhiskey 2018-09-12
Could you specify your question? What person, or anon persona are you referring to?
1 crazylegs99 2018-09-12
Sure, and again I might be way off here, but here goes. I understand that Q is a supposed to be a single person that posts what many to be inside knowledge of govt and foreign activity, including dissent, major upcoming events, etc. What I don't get is how people know it is a single person making these posts, rather than several claiming to be the same person. The reason I say that is that I thought the way that 4chan works (I might be wrong on this) is there are no user accounts and it's all anonymous. That makes me think person A could make a post claiming they are Q and the next day, person B could do the same.
1 ToddWhiskey 2018-09-12
'Q' started at the end of October 2017, there is a lot to study as to how it developed, and how 'Q' began using tripcodes (an ID, or a username of a sort), as well. Besides, it's on 8ch now, also using IDs.
1 crazylegs99 2018-09-12
Thank you for the info
1 Adarcer 2018-09-12
The trip codes also change every once in awhile but always link up to some interesting reading when inserted into google books you get titles like 1945, behold a pale horse, here is the newest tripcode put into google search engine https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=mG7VJxZNCI
1 illithid_business 2018-09-12
So what? That could cave any number of meanings.
The Q people should probably read about Barnum/Forer Statements; they work very well, unfortunately most people have some strong desire to believe that vague statements are the answer to their problems. Q uses the same techniques that any astrologer, fortune teller, or charlatans like John Edwards use. Most of the followers probably just aren't aware of how effective these techniques are, or maybe they are just stubborn, who knows ... there are probably a lot of reasons.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnum_effect
1 HelperBot_ 2018-09-12
Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnum_effect
HelperBot v1.1 /r/HelperBot_ I am a bot. Please message /u/swim1929 with any feedback and/or hate. Counter: 211564
1 amlecciones 2018-09-12
it is the great awakening for those who want to wake up.
1 EuropeanObiWan 2018-09-12
Actually scary.
1 eaglejm 2018-09-12
It went from 50k to 70k subs in a month too. Let me guess no left leaning subs been banned ever.
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
go to the_mueller right now and search for hang. and yet they still exist.
on a side note, if you do this feel free to report as many assholes as you can to the admins
1 mrsuns10 2018-09-12
Which is ironic because Muller is a neo con who supported the IRaq War........
1 Boneasaurus 2018-09-12
You can link right to it: https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Mueller/search?q=hang&restrict_sr=on&include_over_18=on&sort=relevance&t=all
There is only 1 relevant post to "hang" someone, and it's used colloquially in a question. It's not even close to what GA was spouting off.
1 AutoModerator 2018-09-12
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 Vagbloodwhitestuff 2018-09-12
What are some ultra left subs?
1 eaglejm 2018-09-12
Well the main politics sub sure isn't middle or right.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-09-12
That's the silliest thing I've seen said on this thread.
1 McFluffTheCrimeCat 2018-09-12
Arguably middle. But then you probably won’t admit Hillary was a right to center neocon either.
1 jdotg 2018-09-12
Where do you idiots come up with user names?
Have you ever browsed r/politics?
Seeing aa you are relatively new, matter of fact for fun, go post something pro Republican in a comment section. Please report back to us, the size of your asshole after its done being reamed.
1 Vagbloodwhitestuff 2018-09-12
Your user name is boring as hell dude. Probably just like you.
1 jdotg 2018-09-12
Ah yes, now I see your purpose here and why you are "new" to reddit. Was leaning towards it, but you've confirmed.
1 Vagbloodwhitestuff 2018-09-12
I've been on Reddit since 2007ish buddy
1 jdotg 2018-09-12
Who fucking cares, but you just admitted to using alternate accounts? Not le'sharpest, are you?
Thank you tho
1 Corsham 2018-09-12
Man you really got him. These idiots having multiple accounts lol
1 jdotg 2018-09-12
Last I checked using multiple accounts to circumvent bans van result in IP banning on the entire site.
So typically people dont brazenly admit they actively do such antics.
1 Iqfoo 2018-09-12
Some people just have multiple accounts. Its not necessarily due to being banned.
1 alwaysreadthename 2018-09-12
/r/politics commenters are center-left neoliberals who believe in cookie-cutter Democrat policies. They worship capitalist institutions and despise the far left wing of their own party. If you think it's political extremism, I don't know what to tell you.
1 FurryPhilosifer 2018-09-12
If you think r/politics is "ultra left" then hoo boy do I have a lot of political history and ideas to show you.
1 CelineHagbard 2018-09-12
Removed. Rule 4.
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
First, The left aren't racist terrorists like those at GA. You're not right wing, so the left isn't your opposite.
You're disgusting filth that both the left and right spit on.
1 Blumpkinz4Babiez 2018-09-12
In all fairness, the mainstream repugnican party has now become pretty open about being racist and supporting Christian sharia law.
1 guesswhostrack 2018-09-12
Since when did the left and right agree on anything??? That's the whole shtick
1 SnakeInABox7 2018-09-12
They sure went down on eachother over McCain's death
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-09-12
Except for the ones lighting fires and clubbing people with bike locks.
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
Those are awful people. And yet are a blip on the radar compared to the Alt rights evil
1 CelineHagbard 2018-09-12
Removed. Rule 4.
1 WhiskeyStr8Up 2018-09-12
Yes, Wasn't it just yesterday or the day before that they cracked 70000? T_D is too big to ban, but they shut this one down before it got too big. Interesting choice for a "LOL Conspiracy" sub.
1 EuropeanObiWan 2018-09-12
Conspiracies so wacky and crazy that they ban at least 3 subreddits devoted to them to ensure that nobody can see any of it.
1 JonnySkidmore 2018-09-12
Over target, bots are downvoting everything.
FUCK YOU, SHAREBLUE
1 Gamernix 2018-09-12
Not a bot but have a downvote
1 SouthernJeb 2018-09-12
Not a bot either. But i dont think your comment contributes to the discussion here.
Have a downvote.
1 Haze04 2018-09-12
Still waiting on my shill paperwork to get approved, so this downvote was free.
1 _StormyDaniels_ 2018-09-12
Not a bot but I'm downvoting you anyways
1 ATXNYCESQ 2018-09-12
I downvoto for free-o from Mexico.
1 Jaque8 2018-09-12
I've been here a lot longer than your pro government ass, have a downvote ;)
1 Buy_The-Ticket 2018-09-12
I AM ROBOT DOWNVOTE INITIATED!
1 SnakeInABox7 2018-09-12
Downvoted, and I did it for free
1 Orions96cobra 2018-09-12
Oh sweetie, calm down or you will have a stroke.
1 Fuckberniesanders2 2018-09-12
His name was Q.
1 AFreshBowlOfSoup 2018-09-12
did that stand for queer?
1 guesswhostrack 2018-09-12
For you it could have... for you it could have
1 Fuckberniesanders2 2018-09-12
No, it was just a joking reference to Fight CLub.
1 RealLifePolygamist 2018-09-12
Good riddance.
1 ReginaFilange21 2018-09-12
It’s crazy to me, my friend showed me that sub last month and after reading through quite a bit of it and then seeing it get banned...just goes to show they got something to hide. If it was all completely baseless and fake, no one would bother trying to get rid of it.
1 Krabban 2018-09-12
That's ridiculous logic. Say a man is standing on a street corner shouting how the police are corrupt reptilian aliens, everyone would just consider him a crazy person. If he then starts throwing bricks around and gets arrest, the police aren't trying to "hide the truth", they're just arresting a schizophrenic idiot for breaking the law.
1 Dont_stop 2018-09-12
almost impossible to trust the admins or moderators.
1 Krabban 2018-09-12
True, you should never trust them blindly. But, considering I've seen the sub posted the things they got banned for multiple times, I'm inclined to believe the admins.
1 Dont_stop 2018-09-12
Without proof (screenshots) your argument is worthless.
I've seen plenty of comments in r/politics that were bad enough to shut down all of reddit but it never happens. Why is that? There are random comments in every sub that break the rules, but they don't ban the whole sub. What possible motivation would the admins have for banning certain subs and not others?
1 Krabban 2018-09-12
I'm not making an argument, nor am I trying to convince you.
1 PKAwesome 2018-09-12
The daily calls for opponents to be executed is why it was removed. Q cockroaches will find another place to congregate and spread their mental illness.
1 The0rangeKind 2018-09-12
They weren't calling for anyone to be executed. Lol. It's perfectly reasonable for a forum to work in collaboration sorting through lots of research, find common patterns where their actions through history were dubious and require investigation with the potential to face justice for possible crimes against the state and its people.
I agree many of the users posted on a regular obsessive basis to the point where it really did feel like a game that never ended. If they wanted to be taken more seriously, they needed to post with more restraint and focus on actual provable evidence, not just tagging multiple hearsays and headlines to support their thinking.
1 WrestlingWithMadness 2018-09-12
How about the doxxing and harassment of the kid with the satan twitter account?
1 AutoModerator 2018-09-12
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 TapTheForwardAssist 2018-09-12
"Research" = fat bald dudes on YouTube frantically babbling to the camera.
1 Fooomanchu 2018-09-12
I guess Reddit admins are scared of fat bald dudes on YT? lol
1 TapTheForwardAssist 2018-09-12
Nobody's scared except that one of you lunatics is going to shotgun a mailman in a paranoid frenzy.
Y'all got banned for doxxing and threatening, and people are glad to see you go because your discussions are toxic to healthy American society. Disagreeing with people's policy stances and documented misbehavior are fine, falsely labeling them as Satanic pedophile cannibals is not helping anyone and helps radicalize the mentally ill into panic mode where they may do something violent like the dude who fired a rifle inside Comet Pizza.
1 Fooomanchu 2018-09-12
Ahh yes, you ban something you're NOT scared of. That's logical.
I'm assuming you're reporting every comment calling for violence against the President in r/ politics. Shouldn't they be banned too?
1 defhermit 2018-09-12
jeez why doesn't someone start a thread about this?
1 Russian_Intelligence 2018-09-12
Holy shit. Facism has truly arrived. Fucking scary, but oh, resist we shall, with all of our might and intelligence. Patriots roll over for no one.
1 Russian_Intelligence 2018-09-12
I'm also deleting my Reddit account now and will no longer support this platform.
1 lakerswiz 2018-09-12
These are the comments that incite violence that the sub was banned for. Your wording isn't slick.
1 TheRisenOsiris 2018-09-12
The sub wasn't promoting violence at all. In fact, they were very careful not to allow it.
1 lakerswiz 2018-09-12
Sub wasn't but I saw plenty of these wanna be subtle comments talking about their resistance, might and how Patriots stand up to fight for their rights and what they believe in.
1 TheRisenOsiris 2018-09-12
... So what? Are you really deriding a group for wanting to stand for their rights and what they believe in?
I'd like to hear your opinion on the founding fathers.
1 lakerswiz 2018-09-12
[Here check out their comments for yourself](reddit.com/r/thegreatawakening)
1 lakerswiz 2018-09-12
Here check out their comments for yourself
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
By defending their rights you mean wanting to toss notable opposition members in gitmo for being pedophilic cannibalistic devil worshippers.
1 TheRisenOsiris 2018-09-12
I'd want them there too if they are devil worshipping pedovores.
1 Tacsol5 2018-09-12
Those comment were by the paid shills. So many new accounts in there talking that shit.
1 lakerswiz 2018-09-12
Lol
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
https://archive.is/PS5P7
I'll leave this here.
1 TheRisenOsiris 2018-09-12
There's literally no comment in that link that says anything to that effect.
Furthermore, the crimes being spoken of are Treason against the United States of America. This is punishable by death (execution.) This is what the sub was talking about. There have been absolutely no calls to violence since its inception.
But keep on painting the ever-changing narrative. It's not as if those efforts are transparent or anything.
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
How about this one then.
https://archive.is/DxtIp
Or how about this one.
https://archive.is/Cu0Y9
Saying you should defend yourself against an imaginary enemy is still a call to violence.
Or how about this one.
https://archive.is/bJ29i
And while I know it's a far cry to expect you to actually read this but the TMOR made an excellent write up on an example of the exact behavior that led to this ban here: https://www.reddit.com/r/TopMindsOfReddit/comments/9a6dje/an_open_letter_to_the_reddit_admins_why_dont_you/
1 AutoModerator 2018-09-12
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
How about this one then.
https://archive.is/DxtIp
Or how about this one.
https://archive.is/Cu0Y9
Saying you should defend yourself against an imaginary enemy is still a call to violence.
Or how about this one.
https://archive.is/bJ29i
And while I know it's a far cry to expect you to actually read this but the TMOR made an excellent write up on an example of the exact behavior that led to this ban here: https://np.reddit.com/r/TopMindsOfReddit/comments/9a6dje/an_open_letter_to_the_reddit_admins_why_dont_you/
1 TheRisenOsiris 2018-09-12
I'll read it later. I have a hard time letting a few comments put a stain on any of these communities alone. If I did that, then I'd consider this sub anti-semitic, racist and kind of dumb.
I don't though because I understand that there are bad examples within every single community, Top Minds included. That and this subject matter is all very interesting.
The fact of the matter is that this movement has never been about violence. The conditions of our society coupled with the atrocities committed against humanity leave some feeling violent; that doesn't make the entirety of the community bad.
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
Except it was. The GA was always about violence. Thinly veiled usually but sometimes blunt. They want to see the people they view as evil hang. They believe Hillary Clinton and Obama are treasonous child raping baby eating satan worshippers. This assertion is enigmatic of the entire "movement" and telling to how they view the world.
The Great Awakening lives in and can only exist in an ideology with a violent world view.
1 surf_rider 2018-09-12
Fuck that sub. That being said, by your logic then Reddit should ban any and all subs completely wherein a poster called for violence or insinuated something violent? It happens on every sub, political or otherwise.
I won’t miss that GA Q bullshit for a second, just not a fan of blanket rules when it comes to closing an entire sub.
1 Buy_The-Ticket 2018-09-12
nice find dude please repost this as a top comment so it doesn't get buried.
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
Like I know people shit on TMOR and other anti-conspiracy subreddits, but all you need to do is search on them and find mountains of comments dog whistling or straight up calling for violence. And they have a bot to archive all their posts.
1 TremendousTiger 2018-09-12
r/iamverybadass
1 AnyThingWi 2018-09-12
So that is two Q related subs banned within a few minutes.
Well, eff you reddit but thanks for confirming that Q is a very real threat to some powerful sewer dwellers. Obviously it is way more than just some LARP. I've had my doubts about it, not anymore.
It is also time to give up on the ShareBlue controlled joke called reddit, I guess.
1 Kanaaz 2018-09-12
You guys should take a look at r/shoplifting
1 jiggawatts214 2018-09-12
Smells like retaliation.
1 guesswhostrack 2018-09-12
some people don't like the open forum for thoughts if they haven't been approved by our truth tellers in news first
luckily they are allowed to think for us because we never come to their conclusions otherwise
1 Gamernix 2018-09-12
Wasn't there a big expose by Jack posobiec? Where he found the people posting as q and they all admitted it was fake? Lol
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-09-12
Nah, it turns out the discord logs are super easily faked.
1 AdamJensenUnatco 2018-09-12
Reddit is straight cancer now. It's time for a new platform.
1 kingofthemonsters 2018-09-12
That was supposed to be voat.
I think the internet is about to change forever. We're seeing the beginnings of it right now.
1 MrMushyagi 2018-09-12
Why? Because a fringe hate subreddit got banned?
1 kingofthemonsters 2018-09-12
Nah, it's a shame because it starts there, and then when it's normalized all dissenting opinions get censored.
1 MrMushyagi 2018-09-12
Slippery slope logical fallacy
1 ___jamil___ 2018-09-12
next thing they'll ban childporn!
1 anonymoushero1 2018-09-12
dissenting opinions? These people worship the president who literally attacks and threatens the press for negative stories about him, even when they are 100% objectively and factually true and void of any "opinion."
If you're worried about censorship, it's a "movement" like Qanon and support of a President who hates the constitution that should concern you more than anything.
1 OnlyGoodRedditorHere 2018-09-12
Supporting the president is worthy of being banned in your eyes lol
1 yourenotserious 2018-09-12
Well... if you want to lynch his political opponents (which Awakening was a big fan of) then yea. You're a fascist.
1 OnlyGoodRedditorHere 2018-09-12
Same shit is posted on r/fullcommunism and r/latestagecapitalism
1 yourenotserious 2018-09-12
Lol not really.
1 OnlyGoodRedditorHere 2018-09-12
hmmm
1 yourenotserious 2018-09-12
Hey one post. Nice
1 anonymoushero1 2018-09-12
you're supposed to support policies and ideas, not individuals.
so yes, blind support of a man regardless of what he does or says is un-American and deserving of contempt.
1 OnlyGoodRedditorHere 2018-09-12
Please point me to the article or amendment that says people in America cannot support individuals because it's "un-american" lol
Keep the buzzwords coming
1 anonymoushero1 2018-09-12
Sure, right after you point me to the article that says you're not a moron.
See how that works?
1 OnlyGoodRedditorHere 2018-09-12
How someone can be "un-american"? No, unless they are not American
Noted
1 kingofthemonsters 2018-09-12
Why can't I be concerned about both? I don't support Trump, but I also don't support shutting down his supporters either. I'm concerned about everything right now quite frankly.
1 IamNotYourBuddy 2018-09-12
That's kind of how reddit always worked. We downvote opinions we don't agree with and upvote those that we do agree with. If you want dissenting opinions, there's other websites/forums for that. But reddit has a streamlined format that is easy to use, so everyone prefers coming here.
Also, people have been saying exactly what you are saying now since reddit banned /r/FatPeopleHate.
1 kingofthemonsters 2018-09-12
And since then they've been banning right and left!
1 yourenotserious 2018-09-12
FIRST THEY CAME FOR THE VIOLENT INCELS, and I did not speak out, because I was not a violent incel;
And that was about the end of it.
1 bennysanders 2018-09-12
You can literally just make your own website. Voat exists (and its full of trash). Breitbart exists. The Blaze exists. It's not like its now illegal to have right wing opinions. I think Reddit went a little overboard, but this whole "here comes the 1984 style crackdown on free speech" is so overblown. It's just Reddit
1 kingofthemonsters 2018-09-12
So there's no big conspiracy going on? The government/powers that be/elites are content with the amount of power they have? Then what are we even doing here in conspiracy?
Shut it down folks, we're gonna be just fine.
1 bennysanders 2018-09-12
What? I’m saying that Reddit banning subreddits isn’t the end of the world. Do you think the entire internet is based around one content aggregate?
1 kingofthemonsters 2018-09-12
I mean if it were just reddit I'd agree with you. But look what they're doing to Alex Jones? I think AJ is a plant and a gatekeeper so what they're doing is orchestrated, but it's starting.
1 exoticstructures 2018-09-12
Maybe hailing donnie as god-emperor wasn't the brightest idea in a country that fought a war to be free from a king??
1 kingofthemonsters 2018-09-12
Definitely isn't a good idea to hail any politician as god king. They should be kissing our asses not the other way around.
1 ssilBetulosbA 2018-09-12
No. That's the least of it. The censorship of subreddits is only a part of it, the censorship of Alex Jones is another part, but this may be one of the bigger parts:
https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/9f6syd/eu_approves_controversial_internet_copyright_law/
1 AutoModerator 2018-09-12
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 94ChryslerLeBaron 2018-09-12
How was it a hate sub? From what I hear it was a bunch of guys who followed a supposed fortune teller
1 MrMushyagi 2018-09-12
A fortune teller that basically said not everybody on team Trump was a pedophile and was sick and deranged, etc.
1 MildlyCat 2018-09-12
lmao fam...
1 MrMushyagi 2018-09-12
What?
That's literally the bulk of the q prediction nonsense.
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-09-12
Decide for yourself
1 MrHands2000 2018-09-12
Good luck with that. Hate sites have been around since the Internet began; they were fringe back in the wildest of internet days, and they're about to go back to that fringe again.
They had about a decade where social media companies were too dumb to do anything about them. That time is over, and back into the dirty closet they go.
1 kingofthemonsters 2018-09-12
Good luck with what?
1 MrHands2000 2018-09-12
Poor phrasing on my part.
Means the internet is probably not about to change as much as your post said. Not that you’re about to cause that.
1 jimbojones230 2018-09-12
Your beliefs are humorous to me.
1 kingofthemonsters 2018-09-12
What are my beliefs?
1 jimbojones230 2018-09-12
The things that I find humorous. I feel I made that clear.
1 kingofthemonsters 2018-09-12
Crystal clear
1 PsychoFonz 2018-09-12
bye bye
1 lets_get_lowwerr 2018-09-12
lots of you redditors who have never been here happening to just show up right now in this sub and this thread out of no where.
how coincidental
1 spread_thin 2018-09-12
Omg it's a conspiracy!
1 lets_get_lowwerr 2018-09-12
jeez, you people are so sad lmao
1 MrHands2000 2018-09-12
I mean that’s a better explanation than our being paid Soros shills
1 suprmario 2018-09-12
Fuck I could really use my Soros check - the collection agency is getting impatient, but I keep telling them ol' George is good for the money.
1 MrHands2000 2018-09-12
George is always listening and he hears you and the check is on the way. Thank you for your service and I love you.
1 MrHands2000 2018-09-12
must have NOTHING to do with enjoying watching the fallout as the news spreads
1 ChocolateMafia 2018-09-12
Guilty... although I have enjoyed lurking while I wait for my account to be old enough to let me post here.
But yeah, if I'm being honest it IS what brought me here just now.
1 Rolobox 2018-09-12
Everyone loves some good popcorn every now and then.
1 jimbojones230 2018-09-12
Is this the right place to post today to get my Soros check? I missed this morning’s orientation.
1 PsychoFonz 2018-09-12
this has nothing to do with whatever nonsense you are talking about here, i just thought it was really funny.
https://twitter.com/BarstoolNewsN/status/1039603147285639168
1 superfluid 2018-09-12
OMG my sides
1 superfluid 2018-09-12
I was told I could pick up my Soros Bux™ here?
1 heeb_my_jeebies 2018-09-12
you top minds goobers are truly wastes of life. why would you spend your time patrolling subs you hate?
1 eaglejm 2018-09-12
Reddit is getting so bad its going to make Digg 2.0 look like a successful redesign.
1 blackops979 2018-09-12
gab is great no ban absolute freedom of speech no mods!
1 superfluid 2018-09-12
Bye, Felicia.
1 v1xiii 2018-09-12
Please leave, and take the rest of your kind as well.
1 ilovecfb 2018-09-12
Don't let the door hit ya where the good lord split ya
1 SonsofWorvan 2018-09-12
No, please. Stay. Really.
1 SouthernJeb 2018-09-12
You wont leave and you know it.
1 thatguyad 2018-09-12
One less person here who uses "cancer" as a description. It's a win for Reddit really.
1 poke109 2018-09-12
But muh feewings!
1 Kelemvor_LB 2018-09-12
Off you go, then.
1 rickki6 2018-09-12
unreal
1 schmoe_money 2018-09-12
Good. Hope to see you all at the book burning later. Viva la resistance!
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
I'm not sure how that makes any sense.
1 schmoe_money 2018-09-12
I’m comparing butthurt commie banners to book burners. Pretty obvious.
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
People complaining about censorship will soon be seen at the book burning? No, that makes no sense.
1 schmoe_money 2018-09-12
Did you...did you even read my reply? Have you never encountered a larpy comment on the internet before?
1 StratCat86 2018-09-12
I think they’re saying—step one: subreddit banning, step 2: book burning
1 jiggawatts214 2018-09-12
DECLAS!!!
1 handshakedrugs_ 2018-09-12
Update - It's completely removed and ANY mention of it as a post on /T_D is being auto-deleted as well. WTF.
1 MuellerIsOurGuy 2018-09-12
QR predicted this.
1 guesswhostrack 2018-09-12
Why would you need someone else's understanding of reality when you can earn shekels your whole life?
1 eaglejm 2018-09-12
Is it normal for every post to be unavailable after a ban?
1 No_More_Candy 2018-09-12
Sounds like T_D's mods preventing the ban from spreading to them.
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
The T_D mods have been very careful to distance themselves from the GA. They pinned a thread not too long ago denouncing the whole thing as a leftist psyop. But then the GA said they were compromised.
1 magnoliasmanor 2018-09-12
lol just fantastic. It's a leftist psyop OR a deep state insider trying to throw the whoel government. Obviously, in no way, is it all a pile of bullshit to feed a crowd of people what they want to believe.
1 no_muslim 2018-09-12
I love it when cults splinter
1 Adarcer 2018-09-12
What splintering the regrouping has begun ... you did not think wwg1wga meant nothing did you ?
1 no_muslim 2018-09-12
Qultists splintered off of The_Donald
And then there were at least two competing Q subs here at reddit.
1 NoNietzsche 2018-09-12
Man, that is absolutely hilarious. The in-fighting never stops in the alt-right circus.
1 lazydictionary 2018-09-12
Yes, that's how banning works. The sub is completely inaccessible by everyone except the admins. Even comments made in the sub no longer appear in user's profiles.
1 neverwinterblight 2018-09-12
T_D was never GA-friendly.
1 AsteriusRex 2018-09-12
It was at the beginning.
1 Rubieroo 2018-09-12
There were plenty of T_D users that were following Q, and the T_D mods weren't too picky about people discussing Q posts, but when one of the mods went on a tear that was kinda the beginning of the end of the free flow of info between the two subs.
1 amlecciones 2018-09-12
can confirm.
1 nisaaru 2018-09-12
T_D mods were taken over when PG happened.
1 blaaaahhhhh 2018-09-12
Don’t forget SLI.MG at around the same time. Am I age hosting site that had a lot of traffic just upped and disappeared, along with 90% of PG info.
The place would have been making a lot of revenue, so to vanish with no reason is at the very least strange.
1 Murgie 2018-09-12
Lol, from what? They were an image hosting site that people only used to link directly to images.
1 blaaaahhhhh 2018-09-12
Lol back at you for thinking image hosting sites don’t make revenue.
SLI.MG at the time of vanishing was huge.
1 Murgie 2018-09-12
Uh-huh. And where did it get its money from?
1 blaaaahhhhh 2018-09-12
Magic elves.
Not really. It’s all just work of passion. To know how happy all those image uploaders are!
We are so lucky to have generous image hosting site owners spending their own money to host our images. So much good in the world that we often take for granted.
1 Murgie 2018-09-12
I like how you've already had to resort to dishonestly implying that I have at any point referred to anything other than SLI.MG and SLI.MG alone.
You know, the site that failed because they had no money to keep the domain name with.
1 blaaaahhhhh 2018-09-12
Ahhhhh conspiracy solved.
1 clemsonwebdesign 2018-09-12
As was conspiracy. This is real 1984 orweillen shit. Facebook just banned the #walkaway movement as well. This is going to back fire so hard. WTF are these leftist media companies thinking?
1 notsurewhatiam 2018-09-12
PG?
1 nisaaru 2018-09-12
Pizzag8te
1 Ok_Philosopher 2018-09-12
I also remember the sub shut down for 24 hours allegedly in protest of something... but ever since it came back up, all mention of Seth Rich was banned. This was around the time that Alpha Jalloh came up as a strong suspect based on his car theft rings.
Ever since then, anything related to the Seth Rich investigation was verboten.
1 verstohlen 2018-09-12
Winston Smith must be working overtime today. Poor guy.
1 charr44 2018-09-12
See reddit anarcho capitalism
1 firewaterdirt 2018-09-12
AHAHAHAHAHA every fucking time. This is starting to become fun.
1 I_1F30FP135 2018-09-12
This kind of shit actually makes me scared
1 mrsuns10 2018-09-12
Everyone should be because more subs will be banned for not being the echochamber that Reddit wants
1 FurryPhilosifer 2018-09-12
I hear this every time there's a ban, yet it only seems to be the bizarre hateful subs that get banned. To be fair GA wasn't a specifically hateful sub like ones such as fatpeoplehate or coontown, but I think it was a place with very dangerous ideas that were always getting worse. Whether or not that deserves a ban, eh. But I can point you to plenty of longstanding popular subs that don't conform to the typical Reddit echo chamber.
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
If having a sub banned makes you scared, you need to reassess your priorities.
1 I_1F30FP135 2018-09-12
It’s more than that. Censorship is censorship. And it’s becoming increasingly common and “acceptable” for big tech companies to do it.
Idk why people act like there aren’t 4 companies that control all online conversation.
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
Because there are a myriad of websites that do allow these conversations. The reality is you don't just want any platform, you want a popular platform.
1 I_1F30FP135 2018-09-12
Uh, yah
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
You aren't entitled to a popular platform. Technically you're not even entitled a platform. Private companies and people are not obligated to listen to your opinion nor are they obligated to allow you to field your opinion to other people. Reddit has as much moral and legal reason to allow the greatawakening as you do to have me on your yard yelling about how Trump is a fascist. The essence of personal liberty is the ability to also say "no". The first amendment doesn't force private citizens to give other people a platform to speak on. In fact the court case involving the gay wedding cake proved this.
1 mrsuns10 2018-09-12
Technically neither are you
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
And I'm fine with that.
I, for example, accept that the ban hammer will(likely) fall heavily on this thread from the moderators on myself and others based on the perception that we're shills, or brigaders, or some other bullshit reason that's really to silence any differing opinion.
If reddit decides one day they disagree with my opinion and chooses to ban me, then by all means.
1 mrsuns10 2018-09-12
I seriously doubt that “by all means” you would be happy as can be if Reddit banned you
1 Corsham 2018-09-12
I dont think you can make statements for him. You did provide some statements for yourself though that he commented on and you didnt address at all.
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
I'm fine if I get banned here. I've been banned from /r/conservative and /r/askthe_donald for bullshit reasons too. Plus I feel I should point out reddit didn't ban any of the users of GA. You're all clearly still here.
1 mrsuns10 2018-09-12
I meant from the website not specific subs. Believe me I've been banned by dozens of subs
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
That was my second point. Reddit hasn't actually banned any of the users(tbf to my knowledge at least). You're all still perfectly able to voice your views here for example. Or why don't you go to The_Donald for example. Plenty of other places on reddit will tolerate you rn.
But yeah I'd be fine if reddit banned me totally as well.
1 mrsuns10 2018-09-12
Why would I comment on a Trump sub if I dont support him?
1 Donkey_Brolicc 2018-09-12
Cool. Go tell that to people like Kaepernick.
1 fuck_keanu_reeves 2018-09-12
Because that's just not true.
1 dankweeddoe 2018-09-12
Oh hey more TUMOR posters. This thread is filled to the brim with you guys.
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
Lol TUMOR. That's actually a new one, its clever. Did you think of it yourself, honestly curious.
Also while I am a TMOR user I also lurk here. Kinda the point of TMOR. I've taken the opportunity to comment because this occasion is hilarious and the GA has always fascinated me.
1 dankweeddoe 2018-09-12
So you admit to brigading. Hilarious.
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
That isn't brigading... but ok. Now if I followed a link here from TMOR after having never been here, then yes it would be.
1 SonsofWorvan 2018-09-12
Just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they aren’t after you.
Code: 520-LAB-54207A
1 Kneadedtherapy 2018-09-12
:-( .... I was hoping it was just an error on my end.
1 robowriter 2018-09-12
reddit once one of the last bastions of free speech on corporate social media now bowing down. Sigh.
1 Fooomanchu 2018-09-12
Reddit a bastion of free speech? You should get into comedy.
1 robowriter 2018-09-12
Talking personally as someone that was banned from many forums.
1 MuslimsAreSubhuman 2018-09-12
Create sockpuppet accounts
Post hateful, brigading, doxxing comments
Report subreddit, citing your own sockpuppet account
1 sk_y 2018-09-12
THIS
1 guesswhostrack 2018-09-12
1 suprmario 2018-09-12
SO THAT'S HOW THEY MAKE ALL THEIR MONEY!!! GENIUS!!!
1 HuskyLivesMatter 2018-09-12
Like pottery. Meanwhile 100s call for violence in politics each day and no one blinks an eye
1 Buy_The-Ticket 2018-09-12
Your fucking handle is xenophobic and your saying that people like you didn't post racist shit on that sub? Fucking incredible.
1 MuslimsAreSubhuman 2018-09-12
I wish they were as racist as me. Everybody on reddit is liberal as fuck, even in these "right wing" subreddits.
1 TremendousTiger 2018-09-12
So in order to be conservative you have to be racist also? The fuck?
1 exoticstructures 2018-09-12
Right winger complaining about people being too liberal wishes they would be more liberal. lol
1 Balthanos 2018-09-12
Removed. Rule 1
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-09-12
Obviously
1 nbohr1more 2018-09-12
UP!
1 yourenotserious 2018-09-12
Or maybe it was a hotbed of violent incel racket.
1 deleteme123 2018-09-12
Odd nickname. You stand by that bigotry?
1 MuslimsAreSubhuman 2018-09-12
Yes. Muslims deserve genocide.
thereligionofpeace.com
1 CaptainNoBoat 2018-09-12
You're a legit psychopath.
1 ZackaryC 2018-09-12
Lmao dam son, don’t cut yourself on that edge.
1 craigreasons 2018-09-12
He's literally doing what he posted. Projection is their best and most effective weapon.
1 Captain_MakeItHappen 2018-09-12
You’re projecting right now.
I’m calling out your projection of him as a double cross projection of the projection.
I win.
1 FurryPhilosifer 2018-09-12
If it's so simple to do this to take down subs, why doesn't it happen all the time? Why aren't right wing subs taking down SRS? Why wasn't t_d attacked with this method?
1 Captain_MakeItHappen 2018-09-12
2 easy
1 Adarcer 2018-09-12
What he is telling you is this is how they are getting sub-reddits banned. this is there playbook r/againsthatesubreddits r/thebanout2018. While this is happening posts are also being actively down-voted. this is a warning to you and giving you all the ability to defend.
1 DJBlu-Ray 2018-09-12
I don't know if this is what happened, but it would be easy as pie to shut down any community with that approach if that's all it takes.
Users should be banned that break the rules, not the community as a whole. This is insanity. And I'm not even a Q follower or believer.
1 Balthanos 2018-09-12
Removed. Rule 1
1 PsychoFonz 2018-09-12
finally. all websites need to stop allowing this sort of russian bs propaganda designed to divide Americans.
1 sweetholymosiah 2018-09-12
try that again, a bit further upstage?
1 sertman 2018-09-12
The only thing sweeter than watching them melt down over the Russian investigation is watching them melt down when their unsubstantiated, violent crackpot bullshit subs get banned.
1 _medved_ 2018-09-12
Holy shit
1 mrsuns10 2018-09-12
This guy has taken Great Awakening off the grid!
1 WooTs_67 2018-09-12
They are going to ban any sub that doesn't fall in line with the left narrative. Just in time for midterms.
1 brazilliandanny 2018-09-12
I think it has less to do with the "left narrative" and more to do with reddits bottom line. Advertisers don't like controversial conspiracy subs. They like r/movies and r/aww and shit like that.
​
But then again r/watchpeopledie is still a thing so who knows.
1 WooTs_67 2018-09-12
What happens when the advertiser becomes a political party
1 red_knight11 2018-09-12
They then throw money at Reddit to ban the opposition.
1 yourenotserious 2018-09-12
Oooooo they boogeyman is gonngetcha
1 FUCK_SNITCHES_ 2018-09-12
This Q LARP only helps the left narrative
1 SIGHR 2018-09-12
uhhhh i hate greatawakening and think theyre retards but they couldnt just let the reatrds roam free?? wtf...
i liked going there once in a while to check on it
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
Good news. Now that it's been shut down that community will out of necessity be forced to post outside of that subreddit. Look forward to it bleeding into your favorite subs.
1 SIGHR 2018-09-12
Its going to bleed into the datahoarders subreddit?
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
There are a lot of memes produced....
1 kurono3000 2018-09-12
People there was a bit crazy. Understandable considering that most people were 40+ years old but i don't quite understand why it was deleted... Well, i suppose reddit is dead now, is Voat a good alternative?
They killed a few interesting subreddits over the year but somehow places like w***peopledie are still alive. So moral is out of the equation about why those subreddits are being killed, then maybe money and outside influences?
1 321ryan 2018-09-12
F
1 PKAwesome 2018-09-12
Bye Felicia
1 Captain_MakeItHappen 2018-09-12
Felicia Huxtable?
1 LOLunlucky 2018-09-12
Womp fucking womp
1 bardwick 2018-09-12
If greatawkening was banned, why, in the blue fuck, is /r/politics still around?
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
Because it leans so heavily left, in large part because they remove comments from anyone that isn't following the correct narrative.
In short it's useful to those in control to insure the narrative is correct.
1 sweetholymosiah 2018-09-12
not left, the mods are bought, /r/politics is corporate mainstream right wing news.
1 bardwick 2018-09-12
right wing news.
​
you forgot /s
1 risot 2018-09-12
Ok... go say something right wing over there and see how it goes.
1 sweetholymosiah 2018-09-12
Something like, "Obamacare was better than socialized healthcare!"
"Hillary Clinton did not steal the primary!"
1 risot 2018-09-12
No, more like actually go over there and say something right wing, pussy
1 sweetholymosiah 2018-09-12
? pussy?
did I offend you some how? what is your definition of right wing?
1 risot 2018-09-12
I think reps are generally considered right wing and dems left wing, by most of the public. Meaning you cant go on r/politics and promote any republican ideas. I don’t know if any Hillary supporters would call themselves right wing
1 sweetholymosiah 2018-09-12
Sadly the dems are corporate owned ie right wing. Repubs are owned too. Two right wings.
1 risot 2018-09-12
Hmmmm. That actually kind of makes sense
1 sweetholymosiah 2018-09-12
(งツ)ว
1 jknotts 2018-09-12
Have you ever even been on /r/politics?
1 sweetholymosiah 2018-09-12
Not since they were bought by corporate america, the proper definition of right wing.
1 sk_y 2018-09-12
Right wing news? LMAOOO now that’s funny.
1 sweetholymosiah 2018-09-12
depends on how you define right and left.
1 wildranger52 2018-09-12
You realize Great Awakening literally did the exact same thing right?...
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
No, it's not. There was heavy moderation to remove posts that would leave the sub vulnerable to being banned but no moderation based on controlling a narrative.
1 wildranger52 2018-09-12
It literally had a RULE in the sub that comments that "did not advance the cause" would be removed....what do you call that? Controlling the narrative.
1 Fooomanchu 2018-09-12
Agreed r/ politics is a brigading, harassers paradise. They call for violence against Trump supporters daily.
1 elevan11 2018-09-12
<----- Voat is that way everyone
Enjoy the racist conservative circle jerk
1 gandalfsbastard 2018-09-12
That was a crazy place but as long as they weren’t advocating for violence then they should be allowed to circle jerk. I have to admit I dislike the heavy handed mods removing and banning concerned or dissenting voices. GA used to be more accommodating but recently they went full T_D and crushed any non Q loving comments.
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
Mods didn't want it to end up like /conspiracy
1 gandalfsbastard 2018-09-12
Well they shouldn’t be shocked that a larger group banned them then. That’s the problem, free speech has to be honored by all parties. It’s pretty simple.
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
Its a small group of people who control social media and news media who happen to have a large group of group-thinking and asleep people who believe them. Sadly, generations of indoctrination as made it a larger group.
1 gandalfsbastard 2018-09-12
Indoctrination and brainwashing goes both directions. The irony of a calling a group thinking cultish community that suppresses speech as the bastion of “freedom and woke-ness” is lost on you then it is truly a sad moment in history.
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
Explain in a better way on the irony of it so I can respond in a better way.
The mods wanted to keep the subreddit they created on topic. Which was to talk about and investigate Q posts.
I think you miss the fact that people choose to subscribe to it, rather people don't have a choice when it comes to national and local media.
So, brainwashing doesn't go both ways in the way you try to make it sound. One side forces indoctrination on you and the other side is a choice people can make to see the other opinions.
1 gandalfsbastard 2018-09-12
I concede there are different types of brainwashing one forced the other through willful means. In both cases the narrative is so tightly controlled so that no counter facts or opinions get a voice and group think dominates.
I think the more insidious version exists in heavily controlled and isolated communities like GA. It’s very easy for these groups to be drawn into an deliberate propaganda conditioning scheme while being completely unaware of the process and ulterior motive of the controller.
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
I agree to disagree.
1 gandalfsbastard 2018-09-12
No worries. I actually support letting ga exist. I just think that wonton banning by sub moderation is just as harmful. That’s all.
1 mbassani91 2018-09-12
"Judging by your post history, achievement unlocked!"
1 sweetholymosiah 2018-09-12
Whoa honestly didn't expect this. There was zero calls for violence, a bunch of people who just want some truth about various criminal activity of high level government people. Reddit admins are corrupt to the core.
1 WeAreEvolving 2018-09-12
Voat.com
1 BlackDeath2017 2018-09-12
Goddamnit I guess
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
I think they shut it down because something big is about to come out, probably before the end of the week. What that could be, who knows.
This subreddit goes against Q bigly, which is odd for a conspiracy page. Especially when Q just drops bread crumbs and stresses for people to open their mind and think freely.
If this doesn't prove Q and the Great Awakening were right and on to the truth I don't know what does.
I hope this wakes you all up. WWG1WGA
1 DeathMentaL 2018-09-12
This section has been compromised for around a year now.
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
I've noticed, this was my first subscription on reddit and have seen it decline first hand...Then the GA brought back real truth seeking.
1 CommaHorror 2018-09-12
Well said and, I agree! How do I find anons interpretations of q’s posts?
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
Used to be on the GA...But you can still find them on 8chan and youtube.
1 KneadThePeople 2018-09-12
Just Informed Talk on YT is a good place to start.
1 Jaque8 2018-09-12
Its odd that a conspiracy sub doesn't buy into pro government bullshit??
Whats odd is a cheerleader for the president like yourself hanging around here.
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
You mean our POTUS who the left thinks is a Conspiracy Theorist. He never believed the official 9/11 story, he never believed Obama was a Christian or born here. He also, without saying it knows NASA is full of shit. He gave them the money and said now go back to the moon and mars and then we find out all the previous moon footage, tech, etc was "lost". Space force is about competing against black budget, DS, NWO advanced technology.
Sad this page doesn't talk about the fact the world has been run by satanic pedophiles for hundreds of years. Who do these people hate? The same person you do.
1 ThaOpThatWasPromised 2018-09-12
“No! Hes gonna stop us global elites from ravaging kid butts! He must be stopped through back room game of thrones politics.”... Such. Nonsense.
1 Golf_Emperor 2018-09-12
The crazy homeless man in my neighborhood who would throw bricks at random passerby while ranting about "divine truths" was finally carted off by men in white coats the other day. I think it was because he was secretly God's chosen prophet and "the man" didn't want the divine word getting out. What that could be, who knows.
If this doesn't prove the crazy homeless man was right and on to the truth I don't know what does.
1 PlayBoiMarioKartE 2018-09-12
I mean I think everyone on that sub is a complete idiot but I don't know why it got banned
1 BlackDeath2017 2018-09-12
Y do u think dat.
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
Because he's a play boi mario karter, aka a sheep
1 TheHighBlatman 2018-09-12
What Q post or idea did you not agree with?
1 pedantic_cheesewheel 2018-09-12
This thread is a great laugh, the door is that way if all you Q believers just can't stand to be on "Digg 2.0". Here is another great resource I think you should all check out as well.
1 Riggedit 2018-09-12
Oh hey, they RIGGEDIT .
Shocking...
1 Brodusgus 2018-09-12
It's only a matter of time before this sub is banned.
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
I doubt it, this one is heavily controlled. Things leak into it despite that, I first became aware of Q last november through posts made here. Ever since any discussion of Q has been heavily down voted and attacked through comments. For a sub about conspiracies that's pretty odd if you think about it.
1 erincd 2018-09-12
I was banned from GA for letting a mod know rod rosenstien wasn’t going to be called in the last manafort trial since he wasn’t on the witness list
1 sk_y 2018-09-12
I lurked over on the great awakening every now and then to see what was being talked about, and although I didn’t spend a bunch of time on it, I never saw anything that would advocate banning it. I did however notice a change in posts and much more downvoting for the same content previously upvoted in the past after a recent mass influx of subscribers. And I was a little surprised the CONSPIRACY sub thinks so negatively of it. I don’t really feel any way about it, just an interesting observation lol
1 guesswhostrack 2018-09-12
I thought my latest post here would get me banned... or the subreddit banned for leaving the post up...
Either way people are tired of the bs for real now
1 MasterOfNotAThing 2018-09-12
You would think if this was a psyop (which I tend to believe), TPTB would want the sub going...
1 argalarga 2018-09-12
A forum advocating the roundup and execution of people for crimes like having weird art and making gross jokes on Twitter? It's shocking that it was pulled down for inciting violence. Shocking!
1 guesswhostrack 2018-09-12
weird art? the whole culture surrounding them is a disease that is now being exposed to light
1 McFluffTheCrimeCat 2018-09-12
Ah yes we’d all love to be limited to boomer Christian art of portraits of Jesus and trump being mandatory and any other art being a death sentence. 😂😂😂
1 guesswhostrack 2018-09-12
Or not encourage bad behaviour
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
It is public knowledge that there are over 50,000+ sealed indictments and Military Tribunals start Jan 1st 2019. Wants the crime for treason?
You comment shows you support pedophiles and evil satanic people.
Weird art?? Naked kids and kids being tied up is more than just weird. Jokes about eating babies/molesting them etc aren't jokes.
You're evil
1 pwn1god 2018-09-12
Lol
1 jazzypants 2018-09-12
What if no trials begin January 1s
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
What if? Doesn't change the fact that the EO for them takes effect on that day.
1 roopdadoop 2018-09-12
Do you have a link for the executive order? I’d be interested in reading it!
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
Its on whitehouse.gov
Chapter 47 of Title 10 , UCMJ Code, 10 U.SC. 801-946 and in order to prescribe amendments to the manual for court martial prescribed by executive order 12473
Type google "Trump Executive Order Military Tribunals" its the top link
1 yourenotserious 2018-09-12
You need to get psychiatric care immediately.
And what happens when all this pedophile ring stuff just turns out to be more projection from the right?
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
Evil on both sides. Watch the Doc "Conspiracy of Silence" The Elite Deep State Cabal has people on the left and the right.
300,000 kids in the US are prostituted every year, and over 2 million world wide.
Stay asleep and keep dreaming if you please.
1 EitherOrMindset 2018-09-12
Why does Trump trust Giuliani who covered up the 1980s Satanist nattionwide U.S. military pedophile ring? And why did /r/greatawakening downvote that fact every time it was pointed out?
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
"James Alefantis is a child rapist & child killer. They have murdered children. He is protected by W.H., CIA, DHS & media." "Foxes guard the hen-house at Amber Alert, DHS & child-trafficking units in government. They rape, sodomize, murder & cannibalize children." "Our entire government is filled with criminals, child rapists & child killers. I am speaking out now. I may not be long for this world."
Above are a few tweets from Rudy...More here http://themillenniumreport.com/2016/12/rudy-giulianis-twitter-feed-about-pizzagate/
The only thing I found about Rudy covering up pedophiles was when the catholic priest who married him and his wife was accused and he said he didn't believe it. Mostly due to being friends with him. Sometimes in life your friends aren't who you think they are.
reminds me of Joe Paterno and Sandusky.
Read his tweets in the link and tell me if you think he's trying to cover up satanic pedophiles
1 EitherOrMindset 2018-09-12
So you didn't read my link. Just like /r/greatawakening didn't.
http://archive.is/WjFaw
Here comes your easy rationalization. "Hillary made Rudy cover it up before she had any power .... Donald knows that Hillary controls the Pentagon pedophile ring before the 1990s .... the Pentagon was terrified of Hillary .... the Clinton Foundation's $300 million budget DWARFS the Pentagon's tiny $Trillions ...."
1 EitherOrMindset 2018-09-12
So you didn't read my link. Just like /r/greatawakening didn't.
http://archive.is/WjFaw
Here comes your easy rationalization. "Hillary made Rudy cover it up before she had any power .... Donald knows that Hillary controls the Pentagon pedophile ring before the 1990s .... the Pentagon was terrified of Hillary .... the Clinton Foundation's $300 million budget DWARFS the Pentagon's tiny $Trillions .... Rudy has changed, he flipped and he will spill all the beans about 9/11 but only after Hillary gets the guillotine!"
Or do you agree that Rudy being trusted for anything is a problem?
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
I don't agree with his decision there and thanks for the texts bc the link didn't work. I wonder why he covered it up. But read my link and you can see he knows whats going on behind the curtain
1 EitherOrMindset 2018-09-12
I want to apologize for my flippant tone, because I believe you're sincere. Or even if you're Operation Earnest Voice, your comments represent someone who may be real.
But your refusal to acknowledge that Giuliani is dirty, that he "knows what's going on behind the curtain" because he is Deep State & blackmailed -- they don't make Rudy in charge of a nationwide pedophile ring investigation of the U.S. military unless he is fully compromised -- shows that elite pedophile blackmail will prevail.
You will feel good about getting the Clintons eliminated in a military coup, installing Pentagon government, sacrificing a Rothschild or two, and having military trials replace civilian courts. You'll change the Constitution and it will be a big celebration. And the Pentagon pedophile ring will be protected forever, unchallengable. All because of Q. Did you know that Q says that the Pentagon is "the only part of government not corrupt"?
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgYsNuzZnIs
These are tough times in the truth community. I'll look more into Rudy because I believe you.
1 wwwes32 2018-09-12
Whose tweets? That's not Giuliani's account. What, he decided he no longer gave a fuck and made a second account under his own name?
1 ilovecfb 2018-09-12
"I saw this on reddit so it must be true"
1 yeahbuddy 2018-09-12
Voat?
1 Behind_Every_Blade 2018-09-12
Just shows how Reddit is a Deep State tool just like FB and Twatter. When need to destroy them and scatter them to the winds.
1 _StormyDaniels_ 2018-09-12
These people were fucking bonkers so fuck em
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
Coming from someone who's name is StormyDaniels
1 TheHighBlatman 2018-09-12
You're on r/conspiracy.
1 Ty__Guy 2018-09-12
Stickied posts stating that it was a non-violent movement.
Clearly stated that mods would remove calls to violence.
Clearly stated that calls to violence would likely be shill posts and dealt with accordingly.
Entire sub still shut down.
To all the Q community in here please understand that Reddit is pretty lefty and your posting here or anywhere else regarding Q will be met with trolling and flaming.
1 TheToug 2018-09-12
r/banout2018 looks to be the hub.
This is some wild shit.
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
Is this the new Q hub?
1 TheToug 2018-09-12
Edited, forgot the 'the'.
And no, that's the hub of whomever is pulling the strings of the ban I think.
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
Gotcha, thanks
1 ObviousAltisObvious_ 2018-09-12
Holy shit they are removing all comments that aren't supportive of the banning
AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA
1 pbwarren2001 2018-09-12
Nice.
1 abcdavis 2018-09-12
Only one day late on the same prediction made every two days. So close!
1 Charredone 2018-09-12
I found the post interesting and got you thinking on a lot of things. Even I thought some of it was way out there. Regardless, I don’t recall anyone on the subreddit calling for violence. There were several times where someone would post something derogatory and users would step up and tel them to remove the post because that’s not what they were about.
Yes there were posts about holding people accountable to potential crimes but I never once read anything that was even close to calls for violence.
1 crackercider 2018-09-12
I was on there all the time, going to miss the actual information and crowd source intel posted there, could care less about the dumb memes. Lots of good discussion on exec orders, SCOTUS cases, hidden gems in cspan videos, etc...
1 Too_Weird_Too_Rare 2018-09-12
It's a projection, like everything else coming from the left and neo cons.
1 sms_sas 2018-09-12
Also banned r/biblicalq
Ha a site inciting prayer for our country and president!
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
FISA is about to drop and this is what panic looks like.
1 Foundmyvape 2018-09-12
Do you really believe that? Did you believe Obama was arrested last year or that April would be the month it all went down
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
Yes, and no because the DOJ has not started arresting the people who make up the 50,000 sealed indictments.
1 Foundmyvape 2018-09-12
The flawed methodology used to come up with that number was discussed here a few weeks ago.
Q is all about researching for your self so go ahead and look it up if you are truly interested in the truth.
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
Qmap.pub/indictments
1 Foundmyvape 2018-09-12
You didn’t look it up did you.
1 Spartan1117 2018-09-12
There are not 50k sealed indictments though. Thats a lie.
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
Prove it
1 Spartan1117 2018-09-12
Sure
https://www.reddit.com/r/Qult_Headquarters/comments/95gc0f/debunking_the_claims_about_40000_sealed/
I suggest reading the whole thing. its pretty interesting.
1 AutoModerator 2018-09-12
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
will do, thanks
1 yourenotserious 2018-09-12
All Q subs are full of the same violent incels
1 TheHighBlatman 2018-09-12
Proof??? I've not seen one call to violence posted either by Q or on any of its various subs.
1 yourenotserious 2018-09-12
Lol come one
1 TheHighBlatman 2018-09-12
I'm asking you for proof of violence on Q subs. You're saying you cannot provide justification?
1 SloopKid 2018-09-12
Well the subs are gone, not really fair to ask for proof now.
1 yourenotserious 2018-09-12
Well they all just got erased. Incels can always head to infowars or some other cult haven
1 TheHighBlatman 2018-09-12
Gotcha. So you cannot provide any evidence and instead choose to be angry because you don't get it. Thank you for proving you are not qualified to comment on the matter. And nothing, "got erased"
1 yourenotserious 2018-09-12
Lol suddenly yall care about evidence
1 VitaGratis 2018-09-12
Ever heard of ceddit, or other Reddit archive sites? Or archive.org?
1 yourenotserious 2018-09-12
Nope
1 KneadThePeople 2018-09-12
As expected.
1 yourenotserious 2018-09-12
Want me to link to an erased sub? Just move along to voat for your klan meetings.
1 BigZwigs 2018-09-12
Lol rats r violent when cornered
1 47dniweR 2018-09-12
Someone probably posted what's really going on with sunspot observatory.
1 wile_e_chicken 2018-09-12
These subs have also been banned:
/r/The_GreatAwakening
r/thegreatawakening
r/AFTERTHESTQRM
r/BiblicalQ
r/TheCalmBeforeTheStorm
r/CalmBeforeTheStorm
r/qproofs
r/QAnon_Serious
r/WWG1WGA
r/GreatAwakeningII
r/TheGreatWakeUp
r/greatest_awakening
r/great_awaken
r/QClearanceAnon
r/greatawakening2
r/TheStorm
r/QAnon
r/Quincels
r/quqanon
More subreddit offshoot info over at the subreddit drama post
1 AutoModerator 2018-09-12
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 sk_y 2018-09-12
There are no coincidences, this act is an attempt to censor.
1 holly_sheet 2018-09-12
Have you heard Voat ?
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-09-12
Just loaded that site up, second post from the top:
"Every n****r in the US on the first of the month with a gif of a monkey holding it's hand out
No fucking thanks lol
1 poke109 2018-09-12
I mean, to be fair if more people could move there the content could shift from blatant racism to other subjects. The thing about a truly open website is that there's gonna be stuff like racism, just something you have to deal with it.
It's like 4chan, a place I actually visit often, because I like it, even though there's racists, etc there but there's also a lot of others willing to just chill and discuss things. You just gotta ignore the shit you know.
1 Saishi-Ningen 2018-09-12
If you can think for yourself bad ideas aren't a threat.
1 holly_sheet 2018-09-12
On point. Pal
1 WhatIfZodWasOneOfUs 2018-09-12
Does your brain compute that people may be posting that on purpose to discredit?
People are tricky, sneaky, internet makes that even easier. Open your mind, my friend.
Not saying it's true but you're acting like it's not even a possibility.
1 DrollerCoaster 2018-09-12
There’s really no need to attempt to discredit people who do a fine job of discrediting themselves.
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-09-12
I suppose, but it was voted to second place at the top, and the comments were fully on board with it, so if it's shilling at play, there's a ton of them there. That alone would make me question why I would consider that a good alternative.
Regardless, Occam's razor and all that - a simpler explanation is just that people there are either racist or just don't care which isn't much better
1 oelsen 2018-09-12
On purpose maybe. But more so back in its inception, voat was being targeted. Now there is a majority of huh, dark topics driving away most of the general public. A group only has to swarm a new site at the beginning and the community is set.
This is why I find ActivityPub a good Idea to front a harmless, innocent site for normies, but everything is interoperable and the nasty sites are still reachable.
1 abcdavis 2018-09-12
and to refuse companies rights to regulate their own content makes you a Marxist. :)
1 LadyBernVictim 2018-09-12
Wow, unbelievable. If they had just banned GreatAwakening and cited "violent threats" or some bs, that would be one thing. But to ban every Q-related sub? Wow.
1 DarthStem 2018-09-12
Just shows how close to the truth we are and how sacred the cabal is. Why would reddit ban all these subs if Q was a larp?
1 DancesWithPugs 2018-09-12
Wheels within wheels? We can't assume too much here. Controlling both sides of a conflict for an engineered outcome is classic strategy.
1 RealLifePolygamist 2018-09-12
Because of the users in the subreddit.
1 RocketSurgeon22 2018-09-12
Because of all users in all 20 subs? This wasn't 1 but many yet we still have subs like Russianlago that shits out lies daily. Unbelievable censorship that will only make the Q movement stronger. Dumb move on Reddit.
1 RealLifePolygamist 2018-09-12
Why ban only one sub so they flood the next one? I saw the posts on the_greatawakening, they would have kept on creating new subreddits and migrating to the other 19 subs.
1 joe5joe7 2018-09-12
Nah dude, each sub it TOTALLY DIFFERENT AND UNIQUE. Pay no attention to the fact that they repeatedly talked about just moving over to the other subs if they got banned.
I don't understand how people think the reddit admins would ever be dumb enough to fall for that.
1 woodmoon 2018-09-12
So then ban the users who posted the material that got the sub banned in the first place. Does that not make sense?
1 RealLifePolygamist 2018-09-12
Because they'll just make new accounts and post the same shit.
1 SyntacticGuess 2018-09-12
Do you realize the same is true for bad actors?
When you can't defend yourself as a sub admin against people who want to see your sub closed, then it's easy to decredit this sub.
I think this is a fundamental flaw of Reddit.
It's very easy to find a reason for closing a sub, because Reddit's architecture can't prevent it.
Conspiracy theory:
Imagine opponents of a political movement that with very little effort discredit all the people assembled in a sub by pretending to be part of it.
How would you prevent that?
​
​
1 RealLifePolygamist 2018-09-12
I'd get competent mods.
1 RocketSurgeon22 2018-09-12
Do you want me to show you subs that focus on hating white people and Christians? I can show you many subs of hate on both sides of the political spectrum. They banned all 20 subs not the subscribers. They silenced the movement.
1 ryanstills 2018-09-12
Just link the subreddits. There is no reason not to link them. Do not make some allusion to their existence and leave it at that. Add something substantial to your post.
1 RealLifePolygamist 2018-09-12
Why would I care? If you have an issue with other subs, report it to the admins.
1 BraveDonny 2018-09-12
Can you point to any inciting of violence /death threats in RussiaLago?
It is very telling that conservatives think posting negative articles about Trump is morally equivalent to calling for people to be murdered.
1 Adarcer 2018-09-12
um that's not the problem it is the Bias ... and only reporting on the negative. and spinning the positive that they do report into a negative.
Many of us have no problem with unbiased reporting but that is not what were getting.
1 BraveDonny 2018-09-12
literally proving my point
1 RocketSurgeon22 2018-09-12
Can you point to violent threats on all 20 subs that were banned?
They banned pro-trump conspiracy theories that opposed the corporate media lies. They banned because the movement was convincing and picking up steam. Russianlago is a huge conspiracy sub focused on anti-trump theories. It's based on a lie without any factual evidence. This was a censorship effort since 1 side was banned.
1 BraveDonny 2018-09-12
There are people on the left and people on the right and hen there are crazy assholes on the far far left and crazy assholes on the far far right. It is this last group that just got banned. Don’t mistakenly think that regular conservatives have been banned, that’s not what happened.
1 RocketSurgeon22 2018-09-12
Does it matter if they are crazy? If no crazy left wing nut subs get banned. That is censorship. All conservative subs are bad, racists, crazy and full of hate. Go subscribe to TD and see how easy it is to subscribe. You get instant bans. The fucking retarded fear of the right shows the strength of their ideology.
1 BraveDonny 2018-09-12
Which sub are you referring to?
1 RocketSurgeon22 2018-09-12
I've been instantly banned from politics. So has most who disagrees with mainstream.
There are a lot of subs. Banout to Russianlago to many very specific hate groups against the right that total above 30 at least. Not all are bad, they are propoganda subs but banout for example is focused on getting subs banned that support conservative views.
1 BraveDonny 2018-09-12
You might have been called a bot but there is no way you were instantly banned. You should probably delete your posts there if you want to pretend that you were banned.
Let’s do a test, I will create an account and post something equivalent to “I think Trump is a bad President” on the_donald and “I think Trump is a great President” on /r/politics. Which do you think will ban me first?
1 RocketSurgeon22 2018-09-12
You are comparing apples to oranges. TD is a groupie sub not a default political sub and it is prevented from hitting r /all. If you have a sub called politics but all politics is anti Trump and lies about conservatives then it's a lie and should be changed. Meanwhile ultra left wing mods work to ban any pro Trump subs. This is censorship. Also people have alternative Id's on Reddit and go post something positive about Trump and show positive facts that dismiss the claims. You will see these posts daily on T_D.
1 BraveDonny 2018-09-12
yes, we agree on something. One is a forum of unintelligence and misinformation, or ‘groupie’ sub as you call it, and the other relies on actual news but with a bias towards reporting pro democracy news.
It seems like you are agreeing that The Donald censors much more heavily than politics and more heavily than Reddit admins.
1 RocketSurgeon22 2018-09-12
List the pro Trump subs and show me a list of all the anti Trump subs.
1 BraveDonny 2018-09-12
Why?
1 Joesturbo 2018-09-12
It is not dumb it is the ONLY move they have... they know what is happening and what the Media refuses to discuss. Still all anti-Trump non-sense. It really is that simple.
1 RocketSurgeon22 2018-09-12
It's ridiculous, they label the Q movement as a ridiculous larp conspiracy movement. Then they started to call the following a cult. I visited the sub and there was no violent threats or behavior. This essentially proves to the people that Q was truthful and a threat. If you shut down all conspiracy theories that go against your ideology yet preach conspiracies daily against your opponents ideology while promoting violence...that is a super dumb move.
1 Behind_Every_Blade 2018-09-12
Shill or a fckn moron
1 CelineHagbard 2018-09-12
Removed. Rule 10.
1 frodevil 2018-09-12
Yeah sure lmao
1 StGabriel5 2018-09-12
Because of the users in the subredditS. Plural. You forgot a letter.
Seriously? 20+ subs banned and you think it the users?
1 RealLifePolygamist 2018-09-12
The mods as well, because they couldn't or wouldn't keep a handle on things.
1 StGabriel5 2018-09-12
You're hilarious. Keep shilling/dreaming/smoking.
1 RealLifePolygamist 2018-09-12
Keep feeding your victim complex, chump.
1 CelineHagbard 2018-09-12
Removed. Rule 10.
1 Kittens_n_stuff 2018-09-12
Maybe they should ban all the other sub Reddits that any of those users have posted in to be on the safe side
1 WhatIfZodWasOneOfUs 2018-09-12
Excuse me, but if you've browsed those subreddits, they are some of the nicest people. It was in their subreddit rules to not dox or incite violence. I browsed daily and never saw a SINGLE post or comment doing either.
And what about the other... 13 subreddits?
1 RealLifePolygamist 2018-09-12
Lol every fucking q supporter is trying to pretend the sub wasn't talking about civil war and seeing Clinton/Obama/Soros strung up.
Because they were just migrating from one sub to another.
1 rivershimmer 2018-09-12
I did browse those subreddits, and I did see the posts where posters/Q-believers described the methods of torture and execution they would like to see used on politicians they disliked.
Plus the recent doxxing of one particular twitter user, and the threats sent to that person, which I am guessing was the catalyst that kicked off the banhammer.
There was also the disturbing fantasies, often quite detailed, spun about the torture the Q believers were sure was being inflicted on (mostly unnamed) children by specific persons. But that's a whole 'nother can of mental illness.
1 Spiritual_War 2018-09-12
By that note then conspiracy should have been banned months ago
1 RealLifePolygamist 2018-09-12
I think the mods here are smarter about toeing the line.
1 Spiritual_War 2018-09-12
Mods don't ban brigadiers here and let disinfo and shill tactics to take over
This is probably the only reason why conspiracy is still around
Everything here is manufactured, including the hatred for Q and the people looking into Q. This place is as divided as it's always been, because it's a limited hangout and a honey pot.
1 RiseoftheTrumpwaffen 2018-09-12
Probably for the violent threats and gaslighting like what happened with pizzagate
1 Kittens_n_stuff 2018-09-12
Actually nothing happened with pizzagate. One guy let off a shot gun in one shop and that was pretty much it. We could use this argument to ban left wing subreddits because they lead to antifa violence
1 illithid_business 2018-09-12
Shooting up a shop because you read some stuff on the internet is not "nothing." You really think that's OK to do?
1 FlaminEddy 2018-09-12
He didn't say that it was OK. He is saying that it is an isolated incident. where as antifa violence is constant and ongoing.
1 no1_UNABOMBER_FAN 2018-09-12
i remember when this sub was uncovering pizzagate. now you're trying to tell me it was gaslighting. BEGONE
1 kyoujikishin 2018-09-12
Well, it was
1 Joesturbo 2018-09-12
I don't think so - I participated many times and if someone did something stupid they were ejected. It had NOTHING to do with content violations etc. - they just pulled the trigger.
1 RiseoftheTrumpwaffen 2018-09-12
I totally believe you random internet person!
1 Fleshjunky 2018-09-12
Whether Q is a larp or not (it is) probably had little to do with them banning the sub.
1 sr0me 2018-09-12
Seek help
1 Shishkahuben 2018-09-12
holy shit they actually think this
1 Exceon 2018-09-12
Because just banning a sub and allowing a replacement does nothing?
1 Rubieroo 2018-09-12
Yeah...nothing to see there, right?
1 PrivatePyle 2018-09-12
These people are stupid.
1 RocketSurgeon22 2018-09-12
There are a lot of stupid subs. Politics is a haven of stupidity so is Russianlago. This is wrong and fucked up.
1 shanyboye 2018-09-12
"These people are stupid" is a Q saying which, used in this context, likely is saying Reddit is stupid. Banning all these subs at once indicates the ban was political rather than in response to real issues. Sessions is going to lay the anti-trust hammer down on these big tech companies colluding as a cartel to manipulate the political landscape.
1 Colorado_love 2018-09-12
Sessions? Hmmm, I don't have much faith in him to do anything.
1 dzbadman604 2018-09-12
Good! Neither do a LOT of others 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
If the Nuremberg Trials processed 2200 criminals imagine 51000+ criminals considering each sealed indictment is one person.
1 StringsNGoodVibes 2018-09-12
Sessions is a fucking loser. He's doing nothing.
1 gonewildinvt 2018-09-12
Or is he....can a prosecutor talk about ongoing investigations? Can they tell you who is indicted if the 50k+ (and growing) indictments are sealed?
Sessions may look like he isnt doing anything but as we all know looks can be deceiving.
1 Spartan1117 2018-09-12
I'm on mobile so can't link it but that 50k indictments is a lie. First of all they are actually sealed court actions. Only a small percentage are indictments but q calls them that to make it sound worse. Secondly the 50k number is a totally tally of all the court actions filed and doesn't count all the ones that have already been unsealed. Again, another lie. Lastly, people claimed that 1000 court actions was average for a year but that is misleading. The 1000 was all court actions from 2006 that weren't unsealed until 2008. No one actually knows how many is normal but it's definitely way more than 1000.
Sooo yea, q lied about it to make it seem like something big was happening. I can link to all sources when I'm on my pc tomorrow if you want.
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
qmap.pub/indictments
1 gonewildinvt 2018-09-12
This read was sooooo hilarious, I honestly couldn't stop laughing ;-) All the best and who said anything about Q...not I. Judicial Watch, William Binny and other whistleblowers on the other hand have held detailed discussions on the topic. Thanks for the laugh though well worth the read :-)
1 RocketSurgeon22 2018-09-12
Sessions is a joke.
1 oelsen 2018-09-12
What does anyone do against Reddit? AT&T style, everything not US-related on another domain? (??)
I see the problem, but the specifics of any policy I can't.
1 shanyboye 2018-09-12
Retooling CDA 230's another possible avenue. CDA 230 lets Reddit curate content like a publisher, due to the "good samaritan" provision, let Reddit's not liable for content. I'm not a lawyer, but perhaps there's some way to bake in protection for non-inciting political speech.
1 acidbath77 2018-09-12
Wait is Google, Twitter and Facebook Russian owned? There is the real collusion hahaha
1 luchovzla 2018-09-12
Don’t they think that Trump is some kind of anti-establishment savior?
Sounds like a false prophet scenario to me. Leave it to them to eat up the shit some unverifiable anonymous user says..
1 MildlyCat 2018-09-12
So the answer is to ban their subreddit?
1 CantStumpIWin 2018-09-12
do they not realize that gives it more credence? whoever made this decision is a dummy.
1 take-to-the-streets 2018-09-12
They claim victory when literally anything happens. They claim victory when things they invented happened. Q claimed he shut down FBI supercomputers or something and they believed it. Banning their subreddit doesn’t give them credence because they try to get credence from everything.
1 CantStumpIWin 2018-09-12
I never saw them claim victory with anything. Why are people making stuff up about the place? Sure some believed way out there stuff but there was never any violence or doxxing or threats.
Reddit straight up censored a larp. Why would you do that?
Because it's not a larp. Lol
1 take-to-the-streets 2018-09-12
They censored a larp because they kept harassing whoever Q linked in a drop. See: @s8n
1 CantStumpIWin 2018-09-12
You think they banned everything about a larp (10+ subreddits) because one sub harassed a Twitter user?
Lol. I don't think so
1 take-to-the-streets 2018-09-12
They banned the rest of the subs because they are spin-offs of the original GA and CBTS_Stream. That’s how reddit bans work. No spinoffs allowed. Stop being a paranoid loser and think objectively here.
1 CantStumpIWin 2018-09-12
There's the attacks lol. Calm down and just move on bud.
1 take-to-the-streets 2018-09-12
when you don’t know how reddit works and base a conspiracy theory on your own ignorance
1 CantStumpIWin 2018-09-12
makes sense 👍🏿
1 Rubieroo 2018-09-12
Uhhh .. No. Everything you said is inaccurate.
You know, the Bible says it is foolish to blather on subjects up haven't actually looked into.
1 Frnzlnkbrn 2018-09-12
I hope that was a joke!
1 Adarcer 2018-09-12
nope: ever heard better to keep quit, or open your mouth and remove all doubt ever wonder where that came from (Proverbs 17:27-28)
1 Wicked_Googly 2018-09-12
You realize not everyone is a biblethumper, right?
1 Adarcer 2018-09-12
Neither am I that is a derogatory term . One of my areas of study is history and the bible. just thought i would point out. what the person above was saying. It fit within the "context"
1 deadplanetll 2018-09-12
Could you give an example please?
1 dazedfourdays 2018-09-12
Who cares what their beliefs were. Their opinion was silenced and wiped out, what group is next? This is how free speech dies.
1 Saishi-Ningen 2018-09-12
The Qanon stuff picked up steam based on supposed predictions. Even if that were true there's no way to tell who's behind it.
1 smrt109 2018-09-12
Every Q related sub is connected to what will probably end up being the most dangerous conspiracy cult ever
1 blaaaahhhhh 2018-09-12
Dangerous how?
1 smrt109 2018-09-12
It’s fucking pizzagate on steroids. where do you think this is going?
1 blaaaahhhhh 2018-09-12
Ahhhhh, so dangerous thoughts. They’re having too much to think.
r/conspiracy has some pretty dangerous threads too, right?
1 magzy4 2018-09-12
How to legitimise qanon in one move
1 abcdavis 2018-09-12
if you are a sucker.
1 Rapist_Winston 2018-09-12
Why is the deepstate so afraid I wonder?
1 abcdavis 2018-09-12
Did you guys just talk?
1 shanyboye 2018-09-12
Q, if a US military intelligence PYSOP like I'd guess it is, is a resourced threat and something the deep state hasn't yet had to deal with. The deep state relies heavily on the crude mind control that monopoly of MSM and big social gives them. Their monopoly on egregore production and narrative creation has, thus far, allowed them to do whatever they like. If what Q's saying is real, things are bad for them. If what Q's saying isn't real, then one would wonder why the deep state's devoting resources to it given the deep state's crude mind control would normally be able to solve their problems.
1 abcdavis 2018-09-12
Can I get an order of that deep fried state? I've got a pizza party to attend.
1 ShitOfPeace 2018-09-12
Probably release of the FISA at least when it comes to things in the immediate future.
1 MG87 2018-09-12
Imagine being this retarded
1 luchovzla 2018-09-12
Step 1 of 1: Ban the subs so they think they’re “over the target”.
1 live52 2018-09-12
Reddit is soon to be a cobweb site, and good riddance.
1 wile_e_chicken 2018-09-12
Only thing that'll legitimize Qanon is 40-brazillian arrests, public trials, and bringing the troops home. All of them.
1 truthforchange 2018-09-12
Even, Bob?
1 wile_e_chicken 2018-09-12
Even Bob.
1 BallzDeep9 2018-09-12
Bob Dobbs, that is ... r/SubGenius
1 Kobrag90 2018-09-12
They went to voat. They can have all the cheese pizza they like there.
1 Tosa1 2018-09-12
Pretty obvious that this helps qanon
1 Wuggarat 2018-09-12
Bring your Q discussions here https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/politics/q-p3006-trump-tweet-17q-years-since-9-11---unraveling-threads-of-everything-thread/73190719/
1 RDS 2018-09-12
What was their official reasoning for doing it? Why ban subs related to Q? This is too weird.
1 BurnerPerkins 2018-09-12
Reddit is yet another one-sided echo chamber. It’s not surprising these were banned.
1 Kayki7 2018-09-12
What does Q stand for?
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
Q stands for Q Clearance...Q Clearance is top security clearance to everything.
1 acidbath77 2018-09-12
If anything this will make Q if more talked about. Q is right these people really are stupid.
1 Henosis_1 2018-09-12
Wow. So we are to believe that all 20 boards simultaneously violated the Reddit "Content Policy"???? Really?
Talk about OVER THE TARGET!
1 luchovzla 2018-09-12
You’re falling for it so hard lol...
Many of the users here believe Q is a disinformation campaign, infusing a partisan bias and consideration for Trump as against the deep state.
Great way to make you all think that you’re so dangerous to the elites they had to ban you. Now you’re goofy little charade is bigger than ever, you should be happy.
Hook line and sinker
1 Timchik 2018-09-12
Where they go one, they go all...
1 No_longer_content 2018-09-12
lmao underrated comment
1 luchovzla 2018-09-12
Accurate..
1 take-to-the-streets 2018-09-12
All those subs are splinter subs of GA and CBTS_Stream. Many of them shared mods. This is how reddit does bans. When a community is banned, they don’t get to just make another one and do the exact same shit.
1 ChewsCarefully 2018-09-12
Seriously, the administrators of a website with hundreds of millions of users do not have time to play fucking whack-a-mole.
1 truthforchange 2018-09-12
Said HITLeR! or someone
1 NoNietzsche 2018-09-12
The first sane comment I've seen in this thread.
1 truthforchange 2018-09-12
I just upvoted you and that made it 17 upvotes.
1 notsurewhatiam 2018-09-12
Yeah we will all just forget about it tomorrow and nothing will be done.
Nobody fights back against these fascists admins.
1 take-to-the-streets 2018-09-12
If you don’t like it go hang out on voat with the Nazis and pedos.
1 truthforchange 2018-09-12
My assumption is it is more to do with QANON making the threats, and these other subs supporting that "violent content" (or something like that.)
1 _CaptainObvious 2018-09-12
Yes. It's because the banning bridage literally have a discord in which they plan organised bridading to those subs, they post hate speech / threats in those subs and then use it to justify the report / ban. It's really not rocket science guys...
1 Joesturbo 2018-09-12
YES EXACTLY - so pissed about this... they will have their day to answer for these types of things. The people who shut these down knows there were zero violations.
1 Glitt3rGalaxy 2018-09-12
exactly. I was in a secret board, secret and invite only to avoid this, but apparently it was linked to TGA too many times with cross posts
1 JumbledFun 2018-09-12
Reddit literally says when they ban one sub they ban all the variations of it as they want that kind of community gone completely. It's a domino affect not some conspiracy against mentally ill boomers
1 rodental 2018-09-12
Well, somebody has something to hide. I always assumed Q was just a LARP, but this reeks of desperation.
1 DJBlu-Ray 2018-09-12
What's the website with all of the Q posts documented?
I thought initially that it was just some kind of hoax, but now I'm curious to dig in a little deeper and see what the content is all about.
​
1 Adarcer 2018-09-12
not just one site, and backups. look @ https://www.qproofs.com/home.html there is also a link to a site with all the posts
1 DJBlu-Ray 2018-09-12
Thank you sir. I appreciate it!
1 thumbyyy 2018-09-12
It's easier if you just get the "Q drops" app for your phone. So convenient.
1 45maga 2018-09-12
qanon.pub and others have aggregates of q posts.
1 DJBlu-Ray 2018-09-12
Thanks dude!
1 FlaminEddy 2018-09-12
8ch.net/patriotsfight 8ch.net/qresearch. is the source
1 Sumbodygonegethertz 2018-09-12
Diversity of thought and genuine research for the common good is so evil that only fascism is the answer now. WE ARE OVER THE TARGET apparently.
1 TheMadRocker 2018-09-12
LMFAO... BiblicalQ was a sub? That sounds like some Jim Jones shite right there TBH.
1 Revel4ti0n 2018-09-12
Yes it was. Good people talking about bible verses!
1 JumbledFun 2018-09-12
crazy people pretending they are god's chosen warriors fighting against the end times more like it. Delusions stemming from an unhappy and mediocre life
1 Adarcer 2018-09-12
never been there ... possibly a cover for the "cult" angle ?
1 Saishi-Ningen 2018-09-12
End Times stuff
1 BallzDeep9 2018-09-12
False Prophets .. crazies who mis interpret the bible. What's next a Church of Trump? hmmm better ask Bob Dobbs
1 RocketSurgeon22 2018-09-12
All of these subs banned simatnuiosly? That's straight up censorship and more evidence that Q is not a LARP. If violence or hatred was expressed that is worse then politics nees or world news...I want to see it. This is bullshit whether you like then or not. Reddit will lose in the end.
1 damonroe 2018-09-12
There was no calls for violence on there mods actively banned anyone that did very quickly, community was mostly sharp on self moderating due to all the censorship happening elsewhere.
This is straight unabashed censorship.
If this doesn't confirm it for people they are beyond help at this point.
1 McFluffTheCrimeCat 2018-09-12
They doxxed someone and hasn’t it spread across multiple subs...
1 RocketSurgeon22 2018-09-12
No
1 Revel4ti0n 2018-09-12
C-mon even a Biblical sub about Q got banned... this is a witch hunt.
1 Kobrag90 2018-09-12
That was heresy...
1 martiestry 2018-09-12
I dont get it why were they banned, i am totally out of the loop of what they are. Especially the Q related subs.
1 shanyboye 2018-09-12
/r/greatawakening3 and /r/greatawakening4 and /r/greatawakening5 and /r/greatawakening6 and /r/greatawakening7 as well so far.
Fucking Reddit admin bootlickers.
1 NOcomedy 2018-09-12
This can only solidify Q more. Thank you!
1 wile_e_chicken 2018-09-12
Probably. But all just a greater psyop imo.
1 jakekajakekaj 2018-09-12
thats fuckin weird. isnt this a webiste based on forums about anything
1 CamMoses 2018-09-12
Reddit is full of shit, if that was the case the Opie and Anthony sub should of been closed years ago
1 hankbaumbach 2018-09-12
Shame, could not have happened to a nicer group of people...
1 RingosBeardNumber9 2018-09-12
It won't be long before this sub meets the same fate. Mark my words. Some of the thoughts being expressed that go against the official narratives will be considered hate speech or something akin, and the sub will be erased from existence.
1 iridiue 2018-09-12
The absolute biggest threat to the Cabal/DS is people thinking for themselves. They are clearly trying to figure out a way to spin whatever is about to be dropped and will do everything they can to prevent those who are awoken from spreading the truth.
1 yourenotserious 2018-09-12
Seek psyciatric care
1 Weareone2 2018-09-12
Lemme guess. Lizard people and we are all anti Semitic got anything else?
1 tamrix 2018-09-12
Why are you even on this subreddit with that attitude unless you're a shill?
1 CelineHagbard 2018-09-12
Removed. Rule 4. Only warning.
1 Guil0702 2018-09-12
If they were truly controling the world, r/greatawakening wouldn't last a day.
1 iridiue 2018-09-12
You're not very good at conspiracies are you? If you censor a sub-reddit like that immediately people will figure out that the information contained is likely true, otherwise there'd be no reason for alarm. It's being shut down now as a last ditch effort to quarantine Q followers.
1 Guil0702 2018-09-12
In dictardorships, people are imediately censored with the justificative that they are spreading lies about the government all the time, and they can't simple discover it's darkest secrets in an open internet forum without magically disapearing.
1 ShiftlessElement 2018-09-12
“Thinking for yourself” was the opposite of that sub. Every “Patriot” sounded the same, spouting inane catch phrases: “Boom!” “These people are sick!” “I’ve got my popcorn ready!”
If something “big” is to be “dropped,” then go ahead and drop it. Quit yammering on in coded language and lame memes for week after week, month after month. If Q knows everything, then what is the point of “researchers” tracking “crumbs,” anyway? The whole premise is flawed.
1 timstolt1 2018-09-12
c ..an you dig it? e ..dit comments? d ..on't say a word d ..on't oppose censorship i ..shouldn't be sharing t ..this...but then again, everyone knows, right? this thread
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
Q post 20 minutes ago....
https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/catalog.html📷
Main points of interest only.
It will serve as the main hub of all communications once all other sites 'tracking' collapse [8ch only].
What part of another wave of attacks coming [yesterday] wasn't understood?
This is not a game.
Q
1 EitherOrMindset 2018-09-12
"This is not a game" vs "Enjoy the show" and "Winning" etc ... mixed messages.
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
This is not a game so buckle up butter cup and enjoy the show. WE ARE WINNING.
1 EitherOrMindset 2018-09-12
No self-contradictions there. "Not a game but I'm winning"
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
I get your point...But, winning isn't only applied to games. You can win in business, life, relationships, spreading truth etc.
1 Wormwood03 2018-09-12
Which one of those are u guys winning at?
1 exoticstructures 2018-09-12
Smoking meth and running around in circles at the trailer park??
1 CaptainNoBoat 2018-09-12
I wonder how many people claim to be Q. And I wonder how many of them are teenagers.
1 I_Frunksteen-Blucher 2018-09-12
Farewell, Qonanists.
1 timstolt1 2018-09-12
**SHUT
I
T
DOWN!**
1 Subtle_Opinion 2018-09-12
lol when did they ever incite violence? that sub was anything but violent.
1 yourenotserious 2018-09-12
Liar.
1 Subtle_Opinion 2018-09-12
nah, i dont lie. just say what comes to mind. I base my opinions off character.
1 yourenotserious 2018-09-12
What do you think of con men who failed at casinos and airlines and hotels and steaks and universities with four bankruptcies and 3 failed marriages?
Who now struggle to put a sentence together.
1 Donkey_Brolicc 2018-09-12
I bet you're a real winner though... right?
1 tamrix 2018-09-12
It's only violent to paedophiles. Don't know why you would be opposed to that though?
1 TheHighBlatman 2018-09-12
It was a targeted destruction. r/qproofs was nuked as well and it was a heavily moderated sub with only 2 posters.
1 busmans 2018-09-12
Are you joking? That sub was constantly calling for violent revolution, hanging enemies, etc.
1 overbite50 2018-09-12
There were comments calling for public hangings
1 idunno-- 2018-09-12
Is this Opposite Day?
1 Subtle_Opinion 2018-09-12
apparently kids still play that game. =) anyways. the site never incited violence. if you think it did, oh well. youre drinking the wrong kool aid. not one drop incited anything about violence or to cause harm to another. More about protect yourself, heads up, incoming bullshit.
1 Sprinkletatties 2018-09-12
Oh no now where will insane people discuss their desire to see all their ideological opponents mass imprisoned or murdered by the state because of satanic pedophile fanfiction.
1 8bitfruy 2018-09-12
Not that I cared for that sub but this is ridiculous, how long until we’re banned here?
1 busmans 2018-09-12
conspiracy is harmless. greatawakening was scary. one of the most batshit insane, violent, and cultish subs Ive ever seen.
1 TheHighBlatman 2018-09-12
Except you're entirely wrong. It was written specifically in the rules there is no violence or doxxing. Qproofs was banned as well and there is only 1 person that posts there. This was a targeted hit, Q is real and they are panicking.
1 busmans 2018-09-12
Oh! Ok. My mistake. It was written in the rules, so it clearly never happened. Just like no one ever breaks Rule 11 in this sub.
I was there. I saw the violent language. Daily. Quit your BS.
1 TheHighBlatman 2018-09-12
Ain't no bsing. Lol I can tell you're mad. Nah it was written in the rules and the mods appropriately removed violating material. Tmor always gets off citing they tell people not to, and they openly brigade subs. Mods at greatawakening followed all the rules. They were targeted.
Further proof could be deduced from the banning of Qproofs, a sub with only 2 allowed posters.
1 busmans 2018-09-12
Mad? Naw it's a pretty great day.
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
I think he meant (((mad)))
1 Herculius 2018-09-12
I think youre the one that said that.
1 Wormwood03 2018-09-12
Sir! Sir! Didnt you see? It was in the rules! There is no way it could have happened
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
This is trolling, right? You don't live every day believing this?
1 TheHighBlatman 2018-09-12
I am not trolling. What are you confused about?
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
What can you do to prove to me that you believe Q is real? I seriously don't trust that you're not trolling right now, and before I engage you at all I'd like to be sure of who I'm speaking with.
1 TheHighBlatman 2018-09-12
Have you ever seen this video?
https://youtu.be/jxIltNKhAfQ
You are talking to a real person. While I myself am critical of the validity of all this myself, the stuff Q anon talks about us dead on. They were the only people on reddit still talking pizzagate so a lot of people jumped on. So Idk if Q is real but there was that one, the fact he called going mainstream, (the fact it is mainstream, all for a larp?), and the time someone on the chans asked trump to say tippy top and he did, and when someone asked them to tweet at the same time as trump and he did. Anyone got my more?
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
Dude you cannot be serious.
1 TheHighBlatman 2018-09-12
What part is unclear to you? You gotta be more specific. If you want someone to respond why act like a dick?
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
My question was "What can you do to prove to me that you believe Q is real?". The answer I got was a video that was written, apparently, by a 12 year old with a loose grasp on what the shift key is for. There is nothing, whatsoever, in that video that says anything at all about anything. You could literally read your horoscope every day and find it to be as or more accurate.
Which is why I'm asking you to show me you're not just a troll. How can I see that, which is absolute BS, and actually believe that you think it has any amount of truth to it? Give me something outside of youtube videos and rants about deep state shenanigans that can be dismissed just as easily. How can I tell that you're telling the truth. Not Q. You.
1 TheHighBlatman 2018-09-12
You didn't understand then I don't know how to help you. Video is usually the best medium. He literally predicted the nationality of a terrorist and said he would fail and did. There is reason enough to look into it. I've given you proof you choose not to see it.
1 TheHighBlatman 2018-09-12
Wait WTF are you talking about? What do you want a dick pic or something weirdo? I'm not gonna dox myself if that's what you're asking. What are you even asking? You sound like a man on a ledge.
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
What would a dick pic do?
1 TheHighBlatman 2018-09-12
I just don't know what you want from me.
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
Some evidence that you personally believe this stuff. My problem isn't with the content, it's with whether you're just doing a heckin troll or if this somehow resonates with you as something truthful. If it does, what about it feels most 'truthful' - what can you identify with or what doubts did you/do you have that were sated by some piece of evidence, and what was that evidence?
1 TheHighBlatman 2018-09-12
I believe the people, the citizens in the Q movement. They were only ones still discussing pizzagate with actual analytical questioning. A fair amount of cheerleading for sure as well. Like the reason I followed GA was cuz of the community not as much Q.
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
You didn't actually answer the question(s). Can you try to give it some thought and come back with a complete answer?
1 TheHighBlatman 2018-09-12
That's my answer for why I was there. The people. If that doesn't satisfy you then I can't help you.
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
What is it about the people involved in the Q idea that makes you comfortable, or keeps you coming back?
1 TheHighBlatman 2018-09-12
8======D
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
You don't necessarily agree with or like the ideology, but you do like the people involved. Why are the two things separate to you?
1 TheHighBlatman 2018-09-12
No dude clearly I'm there for the balls, ducks, and jizz.
The reason I'm treating you like this is cuz we've literally been talking for a day and you have only been annoying and pestering. I don't need to fucking splay myself and prove to you who I am.
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
You haven't answered any questions. These should be straight forward, simple things to give answers to. What's preventing us from just talking about it? I'm not trying to ridicule you or change your mind, or make you look or feel stupid.
1 TheHighBlatman 2018-09-12
I've told you enough to know I'm not a bot which was your original charge.
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
I never even implied that.
1 TheHighBlatman 2018-09-12
You chose to finish where you started. Please stop replying. You wanted reasonable doubt on how its possible. Showed you the video. You didn't care for it. That's on you. I gave you what you were looking for it was just too good for you I guess?
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
I never asked for any proof or evidence on the topic. Read what I wrote.
1 TheHighBlatman 2018-09-12
Then what do you want?
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
I'd like you to read my questions, maybe rephrase them in your own words, and respond in the same tone and seriousness.
1 TheHighBlatman 2018-09-12
I really don't care. I'm trying to humor you but you're all over the place.
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
No, I'm not. You are the one drawing dicks and stuff. I've asked clear questions and you haven't answered any of them legitimately. I haven't changed my position or intent or tone. You've gone for reasonable response to insulting me to drawing dicks, to telling me I'm bothering you, to this. Despite all that, you haven't actually responded to what I've said.
1 TheHighBlatman 2018-09-12
8==========D~~~~~~
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
Respect is earned, bud. Remember this thread when you can figure out why no one takes you seriously.
1 KneadThePeople 2018-09-12
This is a lie.
1 dontreadmycommemt 2018-09-12
Which part is a lie?
1 Sk33tshot 2018-09-12
This is also a lie.
1 ntschaef 2018-09-12
Na... T_D is worse.
1 Adam733 2018-09-12
r/conspiracy will never be banned because it's disinfo central
1 LurkPro3000 2018-09-12
What an asshat you are.
1 MildlyCat 2018-09-12
I always thought this sub was just 24/7 brigaded by TMOR types
1 crystalhour 2018-09-12
But seriously, there are multiple types of brigaders, but the most sizable lot are disinfo agents who work for private contractors. Sub was taken over summer of 2016. It went from liberal to very conservative almost overnight. The power of shilling is extraordinarily powerful.
1 MildlyCat 2018-09-12
Every time I stop by here there are dozens of anti-Trump threads. You need to stop playing victim
1 kyoujikishin 2018-09-12
After months of disagreeing users came in from the pizza gate nonsense. It didn't change overnight, but the mods have been dedicated in keeping the subs direction against liberals/Democrats.
1 MildlyCat 2018-09-12
Sorting by "Top posts of Week/Month" doesn't really help your case.
Though I do agree that this sub will be/is already seeing a large influx of Trump/Jew posting as their respective subs are getting banned.
1 kyoujikishin 2018-09-12
The only submission in the history of this sub to be tagged unverified is one about Trump. The submission history to this sub from half the mod team is very anti Democratic party. Removed and "contest" mode posts are consistently used to stifle discussion against those same topics
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5n90h5/reports_allege_trump_has_deep_ties_to_russia/dc9qdxe/
1 MildlyCat 2018-09-12
So there are Trump-supporting mods. And?
Notice anything?
Notice how you're not banned or de platformed? Notice how several Russiagate pieces get posted and discussed here every day?
Give me a fucking break with the persecution complex bullshit.
1 kyoujikishin 2018-09-12
So "Sub was taken over summer of 2016. It went from liberal to very conservative almost overnight. The power of shilling is extraordinarily powerful." is supported to a degree. Specifically the degree that people were biased in their control of the subreddit, shills or otherwise. There is legitimate basis for a viewpoint to claim victimization for this biased moderation.
I'm not no, but i didn't claim that the entire viewpoint/opinion/political party was being entirely 100% censored or literally anything close to it. I provided evidence to support the aforementioned point that the subreddit has been pushing a specific agenda. And using those moderation tactics, discussions were deplatformed (or at the very least misplatformed since contest mode doesn't allow for the same kind of platforming for discussion as default commenting).
Yes, in support of my, "After months of disagreeing users came in..." I literally agree with you here.
I don't have a complex, i don't think I'm being persecuted and if I was its /r/conspiracy, big fucking deal if I were to be banned or deplatformed from this place, I come in every once in a while to counterjerk. But if you can't tell that mods are pushing an agenda by using moderation powers on a specific side, then I'm sorry you're wasting your time arguing with some random asshole over the internet you never intended to believe anyways.
1 Too_Weird_Too_Rare 2018-09-12
I can't stand the vibe and tone of this sub and I only come around when there might be a good discussion of a relevant topic but I still have to wade through adolescent shit to find some good stuff.
1 reltd 2018-09-12
We've got so many shills brigading this very thread. As if we are to believe that half of us don't think this ban was purely political. We see leftists spew far more violent rhetoric everyday in the random anti-Trump supporter subs that somehow get a million subs overnight.
1 8bitfruy 2018-09-12
First they came for r/thegreatawakening and I did not speak out
I’m not typing the rest, but yea get it..
1 lottapoppa 2018-09-12
https://www.reddit.com/r/TopMindsOfReddit/comments/9faf2z/rgreatawakening_has_been_banned/
1 AutoModerator 2018-09-12
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 PeaceGoddess2018 2018-09-12
The q Patriots never ever called for any violence. However there were some professional imposters, shills and trolls who tried to compromise the movement and they did everything in their power to divide the followers.
But it goes much deeper. The essence of the q movement - in case anyone wants to know - is peaceful research of publicly available information, connecting the dots and seeing the big picture. Q’s most drops are worded as questions that, when answered, form a deeper understanding of our reality.
The choice to know the Truth is always yours.
1 ObviousAltisObvious_ 2018-09-12
Your words are riddled with propaganda.
1 doveenigma13 2018-09-12
Think for yourself and research for the truth is propaganda?
1 AgreeableFruit 2018-09-12
you all dont really research though do you. maybe a couple percent do and they rest of you read it and jerk off about how smart you are.
1 trjones1 2018-09-12
The idea of research in this sub is doing some google searches and ignoring anything that doesn’t confirm what you want to believe.
1 doveenigma13 2018-09-12
What’s with the hostility? I went there for memes.
1 ObviousAltisObvious_ 2018-09-12
These people don't think for themselves. Q thinks for them and then people make up answers and infographics.
1 doveenigma13 2018-09-12
I’d bet they say the same about you, but I wouldn’t know.
I’m just concerned that many subs were banned seemingly out of nowhere. It appears that they were on the conservative side, but that wouldn’t be the reason they were banned. That would just be wrong.
1 ranman1124 2018-09-12
Exactly this. Reddit admins are spineless assholes working for the DNC, spez got 2 million from sharia blue also, and she still lost.
We will still find a way to live in the lefts head rent free for 2 more terms, 2 scoops, 2 genders and hopefully 2 walls.
Any ToS rule breaking was done by TMOR and other left wing soy drinkers.
1 FriendlessComputer 2018-09-12
Ah yes, what a nice way to deflect. "Oh, someone did something bad? Wasn't us, was professional shills. I have no proof of that, but if you question it, you're a shill."
1 BloodMoonTea 2018-09-12
If some new users start making threats on a subreddit, should that subreddit be banned? Those threats were not promoted by mods or active subscribers. GA was clearly being targeted. The moment you posted anything over there, you’d receive 15 downvotes. To say this wasn’t planned either makes you stupid or evil. Or both. Probably both.
1 pringlesaremyfav 2018-09-12
If you think that tactic is so easy to accomplish, why don't you try it against a sub you dislike and let us know if you succeed or not. I for one would be interested in the results of such an experiment.
1 pinkmaybebabycrazy 2018-09-12
Have you ever heard of "No True Scotsman"?
1 freethnkrsrdangerous 2018-09-12
So it's a cult. Thanks for confirming.
1 the-red-wheelbarrow 2018-09-12
They are also formed as nebulous questions with answers that work after-the-fact
1 Corporal_Yorper 2018-09-12
This was TMOR’s shitty explanation.
Q Never was a single person, but a team of people 7-ish military, 3ish non-military. Less than or equal to 10 people total.
They were accurate to say it was Q clearance. Q is the highest security clearance in the elected sector. Q=17th letter of alphabet. Level-17 clearance is, not coincidentally, also the President’s security clearance. Technically, Sessions has a higher clearance than the President...
Nobody who was truly a part of the Q subs or part of the ‘Great Awakening’ were violent.
The Great Awakening mantra is WWG1WGA, also known as Where We Go One, We Go All. This is a reference to the bell on JFK’s boat. It’s purely a peaceful group, and with every group there are fake users who make violent threats or bash the things and people around them.
Pizza Gate was only a small part of the things the Q community were and are actively researching. If the clergy arrests, high profile sexual arrests (and resignations!) are any indication, then Pizza Gate’s dismissal would be unwise.
Trust me when I tell you all—banning a single sub for violations is one thing, absolutely silencing any and every sub? Now that’s just...censorship and fear. The timing couldn’t be any more indicative either: the FISA warrant is about to be declassified and Rosenstein is about to get booted because of it.
1 Iorith 2018-09-12
And nothing of value was lost.
1 FUCK_SNITCHES_ 2018-09-12
Since when the fuck did this sub get infested with Qboomers???
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
Most still follow this page for occasional interesting posts. And when this post is about a subreddit "Qboomers" followed getting banned, you'll get us to talk about it.
1 FurryPhilosifer 2018-09-12
A lot of them were always here, but they have to post somewhere now that the sub is banned.
1 wanktarded 2018-09-12
Quick everyone to Voat.co to Voat! >!Is it safe to subscribe here again... have they all fucked off yet?!<
1 Cobra-Serpentress 2018-09-12
Inconceivable.
1 qsdls 2018-09-12
I never believed much of the Q stuff.
Until now I guess. Anyone else have a forum or place I can check it out?
1 KneadThePeople 2018-09-12
[Here you go](https://qmap.pub/)
1 VitaGratis 2018-09-12
Try www.voat.co/v/greatawakening , qmap is just Q's posts without discussion.
1 Herculius 2018-09-12
Hopefully the sub can work out there without being overrun by the more shitty aspects of voat.
I think that stuff is overdone there on purpose by shills to get fence sitters thinking the red pill is only about angry racism and misandry
1 amlecciones 2018-09-12
looks like voat is going to get at least upwards of 70k new subscribers.. downloading app now.
1 Kelemvor_LB 2018-09-12
So when the men in white coats drag the frothing crazy man away in a straitjacket, your first thought is that this validates the crazy man? Maybe it's time you should re-evaluate.
1 FurryPhilosifer 2018-09-12
I see this reasoning all the time and it just seems contrarian. Because your opinion is the minority and people don't want to give it a platform, you must be right?
If I followed trump around calling him a pedo, the secret service would cart me off. Doesn't mean he's got something to hide and I'm on the right track. It's just disruptive, and when I start encouraging violence, potentially dangerous.
1 Captain_MakeItHappen 2018-09-12
Let’s be fair here. The men carrying away the loon does not imply the lack of truth in his story— if there is truth.
These two events are not mutually exclusive of one another.
1 mafian911 2018-09-12
"Trust the authorities." Pretty much the tone of this sub these days.
1 qsdls 2018-09-12
Maybe its a LARP, maybe its not. 99% of the shit on this sub is probably nonsense but there's no white coats dragging anyone away. But when one particular and relevant conspiracy takes off and they shut it down, its raised my eyebrows.
1 dreamorpheus 2018-09-12
You can also check out YouTube vids from Praying Medic and In Pursuit of Truth. They both do a good job of explaining Q posts. I also go to Voat and 8 Chan. They cannot stop us from getting the message and spreading the truth, no matter how much they censor us.
1 InerasableStain 2018-09-12
I used to pop into that sub periodically just to lurk and observe. It was honestly getting a bit frightening, they were circlejerking each other into a progressively more Intense collective frenzy with each passing day. It was just a matter of time before somebody ended up taking the LARP into the real world and creating some damn tragedy. Censorship sucks in general, but there’s a real reason why shouting “fire” in a crowded theater is not protected free speech.
1 PeaceGoddess2018 2018-09-12
As of now, all q-related subs have been removed. Gone. Reddit just pulled a complete 1984. Welcome to the Soviet Union 2.0.
1 Golf_Emperor 2018-09-12
Your cult of batshit-crazy where any public figure not kissing Trump's boots was smeared as part of a massive secret Satanic pedophile ring got banned from a particular website, and you have the gall to compare it to 1984 and the USSR? Get the fuck over yourself.
1 dankweeddoe 2018-09-12
Jesus christ this thread is literally filled to the brim with TMOR posters..
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
Color me unsurprised.
1 FreeTheMarket 2018-09-12
What is tmor?
1 Lt_Bear13 2018-09-12
TopMindsOfReddit. They're an anticonspiracy reddit that make fun of conspiracy theorists and theories.
1 Lt_Bear13 2018-09-12
I posted pedogate/pizzagate evidence on TMOR some of their topics there and they banned me from posting comments
1 Foxfire2810 2018-09-12
So......here I am from TGA and I assume this one will get shut down too...
1 SpinnerMaster 2018-09-12
CEASE YOUR INVESTIGATIONS
1 Foxfire2810 2018-09-12
WRITE TO POTUS - I just did, LET HIM KNOW THIS IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. CENSORSHIP IS UNAMERICAN.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/
1 luchovzla 2018-09-12
Nah
1 Wormwood03 2018-09-12
Can you explain how it is unconstitutional?
1 Foxfire2810 2018-09-12
Um...Freedom of Speech?
1 Wormwood03 2018-09-12
Do you understand how freedom of speech works? You still have speech, youre not in jail are you? You can still create website right?
This is an example of Reddit exercising their freedom of speech and freedom to run their company free of government control
1 DerekSavoc 2018-09-12
“Congress shall make no law...abridging freedom of speech.”
Didn’t realize reddit was congress now.
1 chrizer1 2018-09-12
Please respond to one of those people who just taught you what freedom of speech is for. It's amazing that you're just now learning this.
1 Kelemvor_LB 2018-09-12
Yes, it says right there in the Constitution how private websites have to give unfettered access to violent unhinged loonies.
1 dwarfwhore 2018-09-12
For the uninitiated: Sort by controversial and look at the amount of brigaded comments there are. People claiming (rightfully) that thegreatawakening broke no more rules than anywhere else are downvoted to hell, while the snide replies are upvoted. Its ridiculous. Its blatant. Anyone watching should be able to clearly see whats going on. This thread is full of bad actors and the votes tell the whole story.
1 VitaGratis 2018-09-12
That's what astroturfing with ShareBlue will do. Oh right, I forgot that's just a right wing conspiracy even though there's verifiable proof of this fact.
1 FlaminEddy 2018-09-12
For sure
1 giant_fat_man 2018-09-12
That sub seemed like it was full of highly unstable radicalized militants..... maybe it’s for the better
1 TheHighBlatman 2018-09-12
What made you think that?
1 frisbee_coach 2018-09-12
Backup sites:
https://voat.co/v/theawakening
https://saidit.net/s/thegreatawakening/
1 Oninous 2018-09-12
Fox News did a story where they interviewed one of the original founders of the whole Q movement and apparently he said it was all a hoax. He stated that they were trolling and didn't mean for it to go this far and it has "become dangerous, divisive, and harmful". He also mentioned that he was no longer involved but other founders were still. I really don't mind either way besides that "Free Speech" in being infringed upon greatly in current times under the guise of word play, divisive-ness, and so-called "HATE". We're talking about reddit here. Every day people seriously don't know all the horrible bottom feeding garbage you can find on here and I certainly don't approve of all of it (OR WHAT IS SAID).. BUT... I GODDAMN WELL SUPPORT THEIR RIGHT TO SAY IT!!!
​
P.S. We, as Free Americans, need to DEMAND free speech online as a right or find a viable alternative to Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc etc etc...
1 KneadThePeople 2018-09-12
This is false.
1 defiant224 2018-09-12
Totally BS. Source this and prove me wrong
1 Oninous 2018-09-12
I replied with more info.
1 Oninous 2018-09-12
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5fF14L41ck
​
I couldn't find the original interview I was thinking of. Here's a similar one. It's Microchip being interviewed and talking about him releasing the recent logs showing he's no longer involved. BUT. I want to say this also, I don't trust the MSM as far as I can throw them. So I can't give you 100% proof about if Q was real or not. I don't even want to start that discussion. I just wanted to inform. My real opinion and the take-away should be the part about DEMANDING our right to digital free speech.
1 Oninous 2018-09-12
Here's "Microchip's" Gab profile where he posted the logs and discussions with the remaining "Q's".
​
https://gab.ai/microchip
1 EitherOrMindset 2018-09-12
Censorship of any kind, including martyrdom, can backfire. But it can also be used to engineer a backlash/social chaos.
1 Wormwood03 2018-09-12
I really dont think this particular group is large or important enough to trigger any sort of backlash of anykind. It will be forgotten tomorrow
1 SloopKid 2018-09-12
Good. Those people were straight up crazy, and cult style hyper religious too. Can't imagine the mental gymnastics you gotta do to be all about Christianity and also think Donald Trump is an upstanding moral hero.
Good riddance.
1 Diabolus-Ex-Machina 2018-09-12
I don't care.
1 duplexnovella 2018-09-12
And by the way many many people in that sub were pretty new and new to the entire idea of conspiracy excetera I was redpilled in 83 I've been out in the wilderness so fucking long that it doesn't bother me one fucking bit I do think it's beautiful that millions are on fire for the same thing that I'm on fire for good luck
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
I'm with you brother. I don't even register an emotional reaction when the sleeping angry sheep come to bleat at us nor does it affect me when the shills pile on. The longer it goes on the more people start to notice that things are not as they seem. We cant force people to take the red pill, we just have to wait for others to get there themselves. The actions of the desperate to stop this process only serve to hasten it.
1 duplexnovella 2018-09-12
They really do not know what they've created...lol
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
The are using the only tools they have left out of desperation. They are going 5o lose this one. Can you imagine in a community of 70k users how many others were reading it that didnt have accounts? Can you imagine how many of them will never see the media through the same eyes? This is a huge red pill moment.
1 duplexnovella 2018-09-12
I was lurking here for a year before I created my first account.. I concur..
As I mentioned to others recently.
Think of how many novels or screenplays have been written about Q in the last 6 month's?
Even if Red Dawn happened for real, these truths will be passed along by many for decades...
1 lowswaga 2018-09-12
Yep. I've been laughed at most of my life for knowing what's really going on. Anymore I just feel bad for the person. I didn't come to follow the herd this lifetime, I came to forge my own path.
1 GumdropGoober 2018-09-12
You write like a psycho, lol.
1 abcdavis 2018-09-12
sounds like you are just lonely.
1 duplexnovella 2018-09-12
Rotflmao...
Lonely? I'm not sure that's ever happened to me... (But I guess you'd know what it's like)
Married at 21, for 30 years, 3 grown kids. Now Divorced 2 years, dating 3 women currently and actually just took my ex to the movie.
Lonely? Trust me..lol At this point I relish the odd night I get to sleep alone.
1 sneakygingertroll 2018-09-12
/r/ihavesex
1 duplexnovella 2018-09-12
No.. Not as much they'd like.. I'd be dead & broke... Cialis is expensive!
1 abcdavis 2018-09-12
oh...we trust you ;)
1 duplexnovella 2018-09-12
I was using the phrase in context... All that I dating have been warned NOT to trust me..and told about each other.. And yet they line up, schedule their nights weekly.. Women online in 2018 Are an odd bunch that's for sure.
1 Swan_in_a_Cage 2018-09-12
It's funny cause, on that banout2018 subreddit, everyones comment is deleted unless its "I support the ban"
1 frodevil 2018-09-12
We're just doing it ironically!!!
1 Glag82 2018-09-12
As with CBTS and now GA, your actions alone speak volumes. If it was really nonsense and ineffective why the need to target, infiltrate and undermine? Eh, patience is a virtue no one involved in this gets to walk away including all involved. You know whats coming you can delay it, loop it or even try to slow it down but you know it's too late. All the obfuscation all the lies, trickery and deceit yet here we still are... heading towards the inevitable. You will answer for all you have done sooner or later. Just as CBTS has done and GA has done well prepared backed up regrouped and back on the attack. Enjoy it while it last, you know whats coming more than most. Tekel...and found lacking.
1 lazaplaya5 2018-09-12
My post about Cemex's stock about to tank (after the NM arrests today) was removed completely - looks like they're getting scared.
1 Captain_MakeItHappen 2018-09-12
Condé Nast corporate interests, money, a consistent left bias that Reddit must have, pressure from lobbyists calling for it to $hutdown.
1 Memetic1 2018-09-12
Good fucking riddance. That sub was a self radicalizing terrorist breeding pit.
1 sweetholymosiah 2018-09-12
source?
1 TheTrumpsOfDoom 2018-09-12
As a disclaimer, I don't believe in Q Anon and I think the people following it are mostly engaging in wish-fulfillment. But, those guys were bringing a lot of things to light that I might have otherwise missed, and they were always perfectly nice to me when I asked questions in good faith. This is bullshit.
1 ranman1124 2018-09-12
Burn this nazi!
/s
1 amlecciones 2018-09-12
agree everyone kept an open mind and everyone was left to decide on the veracity of links through their own critical thinking.
1 Whataboutthatbratho 2018-09-12
But also caused a 24 year old twitter user to get death threats and pics of their house so
1 joey_bosas_ankles 2018-09-12
Milo's official Twitter response to the banning is amazing
1 BitchesBHating 2018-09-12
I can’t see it, or is that the joke?
1 joey_bosas_ankles 2018-09-12
That's the joke.
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
I'd love to know what it was but the link opens twitter and closed immediately for me. Going straight to twitter does not reveal a response. Pulled from twitter already?
In a related note I saw all the links Q posted - they were ready for today. It certainly was a coordinated attack. Looking forward to the day when the light of truth shines on this whole sordid affair
1 elifcatsby 2018-09-12
Happy cake day!
1 joey_bosas_ankles 2018-09-12
Muchas gracias
1 sneakygingertroll 2018-09-12
its been like 2 years and it still gets a chuckle from me
1 SnakeInABox7 2018-09-12
Never gets old
1 Wicked_Googly 2018-09-12
Incoming tsunami of retired people leaving their houses for the first time in months, to get supplies. Invest in Depends and stay off the roads for awhile.
1 goomylord 2018-09-12
I think the whole theory and his credentials have no credibility but this is terrible censorship.
1 Anarchist16 2018-09-12
Okay... so since they're banning multiple subs. Isn't this a loss for reddit as a whole? People will eventually leave, and I feel like that's the case if they ban this sub. The way I see it, they're trying get rid of any real conversations. Intelligent conversations at that, since they're targeting this sub also. After that, who knows what will happen
1 ShelSilverstain 2018-09-12
A ton of people are turned off to the site by that moronic bullshit
1 Anarchist16 2018-09-12
Are they banning specific subreddits? Or just going out of their way to ban whatever? I'm just confused as to why it's happening in the first place. The ones I've seen banned so far were pretty odd ones to begin with, so I'm not surprised they're gone.
1 LogicBytes 2018-09-12
Should of happened a lot sooner like in January 1, 2017.
1 SlimSlackerKKuts 2018-09-12
banning dead subs with literally 0 purpose is a good thing if u ask me
1 Oliver-ToyCatFriend 2018-09-12
I have not followed "QAnon" or whatever at all.... someone give me the TL;DR of what the hell it was about?
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
I suggest searching YouTube for PrayingMedics videos, they are going to be a much easier format to digest than the remaining social media platforms. Do it quick though, I would not be surprised if YouTube goes to war with Q followers next.
1 YxDOxUx3X515t 2018-09-12
Yeah .. so much for a larp? If its not a threat why attack??
1 oculoc7 2018-09-12
This is getting ridiculous. Deleting Reddit now. Won’t miss it.
1 _Benny_Lava 2018-09-12
But...you didn't
1 ellysaria 2018-09-12
They probably deleted the shortcut for internet explorer opening reddit on their desktop
1 harrycontrary 2018-09-12
This seems like it would be an ADA accommodation violation.
1 Sexybabyyeah 2018-09-12
What!
1 GiveMeSomeSugarBby 2018-09-12
TRY AND DIVIDE US.
Someone with code make a damn website for us to all join.
1 red_knight11 2018-09-12
There was a post yesterday about how some user typed in Great Awakening in the Reddit search and it didn’t exist, but then it existed 5 minutes later.
The user warned it was most likely about to be banned.
I didn’t expect it to be this quick
1 Psyk0Tripp 2018-09-12
That just happened with me and this sub
1 hoeskioeh 2018-09-12
that user was neon revolt, according to his blog article
1 hoeskioeh 2018-09-12
All for a LARP...?
1 Herculius 2018-09-12
Larping and accepting whacky sounding political opinions is now an unacceptable and bannable offense (but only on one side)
Memes might be illegal in Europe soon.
Good times. They're trying to take over this sub too and I suspect if people don't completely bend over to the shareblue extremists theyll ban this sub also.
1 OceanGrow31 2018-09-12
Idk Q and POTUS both posted (8ch and twit)at the exact same time (with only a 10 second difference) AT THE REQUEST of another anon.
I’ve been skeptical but the proofs are too much.
1 ShamanicHellZoneImp 2018-09-12
Ok for conversation sake, what if someone in the admin like miller or scavino were the ones behind it. All that would prove is a cynical manuipulation to the point of trying to form a cult for their own gain. The notions of secret house arrests, gitmo detentions and mueller actually working to uncover clinton pedo rings....its still false information. So even if Q is run by trump directly, how does that not make the plight of its followers all the more pathetic. It would just be direct manipulation by use of misinfornation.
Like i honestly dont get the allure.
1 defiant224 2018-09-12
The allure is that if you took the time to check out the drops, a lot of it is actually accurate and factual to events happening right now, specifically the FISA stuff.
Look, I know it's easy to look at the wacky posts there and paint everyone with a broad stroke. But the reality is, this is a grass roots movement that has attracted a lot of people from various backgrounds. Everyone has their own biases and agendas and a lot of people interject them into Q drops. And some of what Q says is just hard to believe because it's so out there (but not for this subreddit). However, there is enough there to look at the news and say 'yeah, I remember Q saying that a couple months ago.' And quite frankly, it's an awesome spy story and it's interaction takes you along for the ride like nothing else.
1 DoingTimeOnMapleDr 2018-09-12
Well said. If anything it makes you dig into the news and see how certain events are related. We wouldn't want people thinking for themselves now would we?
1 hoeskioeh 2018-09-12
Guess that is why the banned /r/QProofs
Nothing but pictures in there, none of them violating any rules.
1 ariebvo 2018-09-12
Im just a tourist here but doesnt LARP sound kinda dangerous when anything can be interpreted as fact as long as it fits your viewpoint?
Like, im well aware that this is a human thing and everyone does it subconsciously but it seems like all the /pol/ spin offs are aware its probably false but dont seem to care. Seems kinda scary when people start indulging eachother in their terrorist murderplot fanfiction or whatever they believe in.
1 Herculius 2018-09-12
How about when the larp is straight from the mouth of the media and intelligenc agencies and causes a war killing millions of people? (WMDs in Iraq? Gulf of Tonkin)
I don't know how much Q corresponds to reality or fantasy, if any... But I'm happy people with alternative views exist and were looking in to stories from another angle. It's better to have competing stories than just one universal unquestioned crock of shit
1 ariebvo 2018-09-12
Thats a fair point, everyone should be skeptical of the war machine and all information around it.
But fighting misinformation with misinformation isnt good either. Unlike msm they really never have to justify themselve in any way, and can say literally anything they want without any basis.
Also, there are many sources of news that are critical, my guess is the main difference is that they are kinda boring in comparison. Q anon is feeding into peoples undercover spy fantasy which is fine until you start calling real people "threats".
1 Lt_Bear13 2018-09-12
I was checking out TopMindsOfReddit and they are claiming anything Q related was banned because these people who were getting accused of being 'pizzagate' are getting death threats. I wonder if there is anything to this? I'm currently looking into it. (P.S. I know topmindsof reddit is an anti-conspiracy reddit. I check out their sources, arguments, and posts; even though I find them rude and immature.)
This is just one reason why the QAnon subs got banned. On the 12th of August a user on 8Chan posted a vague and cryptic message linking a satirical twitter account to a "global network of baby eating demonic pedophiles". But this wasn't just any 8Chan user, radicalized reddit users consider this to be "drop" from "QAnon" a person they believe to a prophet.
This message exploded through the QAnon network on reddit, where the movement is primarily based. This 'message from Q' was by design an incendiary bomb that was to be widely disseminated to the “Q believers”. This directly lead to owner of the twitter account being targeted and receiving hundreds of threatening messages sent by Q followers.
If you think that QAnon has nothing to do with Reddit. Then you would be gravely mistaken. r/Greatawakening is of such importance to the “Q Movement” that they were directly referenced by “QAnon” in the most recent “drop”.
These subs are becoming more radicalized and more emboldened every day. They openly mark their harassment as “Q sent me”. This hysteria is escalating, and it won’t stop until someone is dead. QAnon is Pizzagate, and it is as every bit as hysterical, deranged and dangerous. The QAnon subreddits are extremist training grounds. They not only promote the radicalization of their users, but unapologetically incite them to commit violent acts. This incendiary bomb was heavily promoted on several subreddits.
The reddit QAnon platform on reddit resulted in the twitter user “S8n” receiving 200+ threats from enraged Q “cultists”. This harassment can be easily found on his twitter account.
We at the TMoR have confirmed that u/itss8n the owner of the @s8n twitter account that was targeted, and he personally reported the harassment to the moderators of the main QAnon subreddit r/GreatAwakening, but they refused to remove the offending post claiming there was "no evidence" of the user being harassed. Instead they deleted his posts begging them to remove their multiple stickied threads about him, even though he explicitly stated he was receiving threats. They then officially then encouraged further harassment, and also provided an article containing his personal details.
Let me repeat that: they shared his personal details – when they knew he was getting death threats from their own users.
u/itss8n : Leave me alone. - REMOVED BY THEIR MODS. u/itss8n : “I got harassed all day yesterday being accused of being a fucking child sex trafficker... do you have any idea what that’s fucking like, to be accused of something so vile because of a 3 year old tweet about a fucking PIZZA. Do you realise how insane that sounds.” - REMOVED BY THEIR MODS. incite : to move to action : stir up : spur on : urge on
Examples of incite in a Sentence
The news incited widespread fear and paranoia.
the rock band's failure to show up incited a riot, as the crowd had waited for hours
You don't have to explicitly direct people to action, in order to "incite" them. Implying that someone is being a satanic pedophile who murders children and part of an unholy opposition is a direct incitement to violence.
Did the "Q" Post incite users into send death threats. Demonstrably, yes it did.
Did those subs promote a message proven to incite their users into making violent threats. Demonstrably, yes it did.
Did those subs refuse to remove the offending threads after being informed that the user was received death threats, yes they are still promoting these threads.
This message stickied and promoted by the QAnon subs provably directly led to death threats and harassment. And yet none of these subs removed the offending posts.
We have contacted the mods of these subreddits, but with the indisputable proof, but prior to their banning, all of these posts were still publicly available. The only response we received was from the Mods of The_GreatAwakening who told me that caring about death threats made me “of no value to society”. And the mods of GreatAwakening muted me.
r/GreatAwakening
1859: Satan twitter account
Q:1859"This Twitter acct was referenced for a very specific reason. HOLDS many 'questionable' messages from people of power/influence. These accounts are run by BIG NAMES."
INTERESTING Satan twitter.com/s8n - various references
Results to investigation into subscribers claim of receiving "death threats" because of Qdrop #1859 Q!!mG7VJxZNCI
Satan Twitter account is run by a 24 year old. Q... what the hell? Pun intended.
These subs were also involved in the harassment:
r/the_GreatAwakening
Q Post 1859 - "Satan" Twitter account: I miss you son @realDonaldTrump Q: This Twitter acct was referenced for a very specific reason. HOLDS many 'questionable' messages from people of power/influence. These accounts are run by BIG NAMES. Q1859 @s8n - some names s8n instagram followers r/DrainTheSwamp
Patriots! We have the enemy scared and scurrying to delete any incriminating tweets from bad actors. I urge you all to DIG. We need to know who our enemies are. Find the tweets and expose them! ThanQ
Q posted this Account asked who was in control of these people and it’s obvious it’s Satan~ ~ Pray People ~ if you see Satan you can’t deny God ~ and God loves you!!
Similar posts:
An open letter to the Reddit Admins: Why don't you take death threats seriously? The Mods of r/GreatAwakening stickied a post calling for the targeted harassment of a twitter user. The result? Hundreds of threats sent directly to the user. When the individual directly reported the harassment to them, they claimed there was "no evidence”… Here is proof of 100+ threats. Don’t let the r/The_Donald and r/conspiracy distance themselves from QAnon and Qult. They are complicit in the explosion of hysteria and stupidity. They believe pretty much the exact same conspiracies and everything they read on 4chan. [Huge Effortpost] I've documented the harassment/doxxing campaign of /r/GreatAwakening users against the twitter user @S8n. I believe this is an intentional act of malice perpetuated by the mods there. I implore you guys to read and report this to the Admins. EDIT: Updated the context of this comment.
1 AutoModerator 2018-09-12
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 SIGHR 2018-09-12
Thanks for this info
1 RoostasTowel 2018-09-12
Oh boy.
More censorship from everyone's favorite website.
And most of the users will stand and applaud for some reason.
1 Bodegaz 2018-09-12
R/Spacedicks is allowed but not qanon lol
1 Darnaldt-rump 2018-09-12
If q's such a psyop why is it being pushed so hard to ban it?
1 sydneybluestreet 2018-09-12
Quick. Someone make a new sub for Q-related posting.
1 vegan-penguin 2018-09-12
r/gullibleretards
1 mandomaj 2018-09-12
Screw these book burners, I'm out of here. No need to give them subscribers any more.
1 sonicb00m42 2018-09-12
Do not stress.
​
Cats been out the bag for sometime now.
​
Lest we forget how our Founding Fathers did things.
​
We do they do, but better.
​
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABhyKEK-CDg
​
​
1 Fluffygsam 2018-09-12
How did these people not get that it was an ARG? Like anyone with a brain would be able to see that. You mean to tell me people actually took it seriously and believed it??
1 Herculius 2018-09-12
I see a bunch of comments like the following: Ill repost my response below:
No they weren't. Talking about indictments "around the corner" or even military tribunals, however misguided it may be, is not a "call or incitement of violence. They were talking about political and legal processes they think will happen or would like to see happen. That isn't advocating anyone go murder or inflict criminal violence on anyone.
1 Shadowulfen 2018-09-12
Amen
1 Lord_Eizo 2018-09-12
hope the_donald gets banned
let's see israel come to their rescue, lol
1 Fixitflick 2018-09-12
Expect flack when you're over the target. This is getting interesting.
1 MesaBoogeyMan 2018-09-12
So that freedom of speech fad...
1 Hotsiam 2018-09-12
make 1984 fiction again
1 zoopzoopo 2018-09-12
Never went there but this banout shit is sad as fuck. How pathetic can you be, actively trying to silence opinions you don't agree with on reddit?
To those 'power mods' or whatever, if you're not being paid by someone to do it, get a fucking life, sheesh. Like seriously, is your life that empty? I kinda feel sorry for you tbh. Go outside. Have a break from the internet.
1 vegan-penguin 2018-09-12
The subs being banned are bastions of hate speech. No platform for bigots.
1 zoopzoopo 2018-09-12
big·ot
ˈbiɡət/
noun
a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.
Self awareness level 0.
1 vegan-penguin 2018-09-12
I love that you left off an important part of the definition to fit your view.
Bigot: a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (such as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance.
See that last part? These subs being banned were bastions of hate speech. This isn't about being offended by different opinions, this is about decreasing the spread of hateful rhetoric. If these people want to be bigoted scum, their ability to spread it should be limited in every possible way.
1 zoopzoopo 2018-09-12
I didn't leave anything off - look : https://i.imgur.com/7yly5jm.jpg
I actually think you're spreading hateful rhetoric by calling people bigoted scum. I think you are actually a bigot, and I'm sure plenty would agree.
You know what I'll do though, rather than spend my time trying to shut down your speech or subreddits you frequent? Just ignore your insane ramblings. Because I'm not a fucking sad act.
Again, if you don't go to these subs, you won't see anything to get offended about and cry like a baby. So why do you go there in the first place?
1 Valarauth 2018-09-12
Brand management. Target demographics. Digital gentrification.
I know this explanation is going to be dismissed because few here seems to think companies are motivated by profit and are just carrying out edicts from a shadow government, but sometimes a store owner is silencing the screaming outside their shop because it is bad for business.
Expect more censorship. As companies drive away the undesirable, other companies companies are going to step up efforts to not be overrun by the outcasts.
Expect even more censorship. The sites that are open are going to become so toxic that they get deplatformed.
1 Daddy616 2018-09-12
https://www.reddit.com/r/redditrequest/comments/9fbyrj/requesting_rgreatawakening_i_will_build_a/?utm_source=reddit-android
1 AutoModerator 2018-09-12
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 Daddy616 2018-09-12
I have no fucking clue what the hell that means...
1 Hobomike123 2018-09-12
Reddit is in full purge mode atm
1 Herculius 2018-09-12
I hope people don't leave and instead stay and continue to be a thorn in the side of people who want to make all popular places on the internet one big echo chamber.
1 jonas6701 2018-09-12
People will reunite elsewhere. Keep comms open and spread the word where we should all land to follow our movement. wwg1wga
1 lordsot 2018-09-12
Can someone eli5 what this is about ?
1 NewModelRepublic 2018-09-12
I won't be losing sleep about banning a subreddit whose members called for military tribunals for civilians, made wild predictions that never happened and would talk about events in an extremely bizzare way. It honestly sounded like a place populated by people with schizophrenia at times.
1 robbymc 2018-09-12
Like with all big groups some wild ideas are thrown out, that don’t mean the non wild ones that are found are wrong and worth investigating
1 UnseenPresence2016 2018-09-12
In the case of QAnon, it actually does when those who believe seem to believe that EVERYTHING is accurate as their 'proof'. In that case, if anything ISN'T, then the whole thing comes falling down.
1 7katalan 2018-09-12
I don't know one way or the other, but I think one possibility is that if QAnon is a psyop, wouldn't then banning everything in one fell swoop be part of legitimizing it as disinfo?
​
Q is interesting but I've def seen a lot of wrong from it. I have no clue what it is but I think either an AI or a psyop
1 robbymc 2018-09-12
Interesting thought, or it could be what it said it is, lots of very real connections, and it’s main point is to look at these things yourself, it’s worth digging into
1 VsAcesoVer 2018-09-12
It's a psyop.
1 wishninja2012 2018-09-12
So if you follow lots of the posts point to Chinese sources. I bet CIA shut them down.
1 DudeBroBrahBossChief 2018-09-12
Disgusting. Truth will come out no matter what. Wwg1wga
1 UnseenPresence2016 2018-09-12
There is no truth to QAnon. That still doesn't mean banning a subreddit is a smart action.
1 AbsolutelyZak 2018-09-12
If they can, they will.
If We the People will, WE CAN !!
​
1 SlooperWrap 2018-09-12
Can someone explain all of this to me? Pizzagate, great awakening I lurk but I don't understand
1 happysmash27 2018-09-12
What were they about?
1 Shadowulfen 2018-09-12
Actually supporting our president and believing that there are things going o behind the scenes that the main stream media intentionally doesnt tell you about... common sense...
1 shitsfuckedupalot 2018-09-12
So you can be banned for being wrong now?
1 JCDentdong 2018-09-12
just what the internet needs, emboldened q anon retards. thanks reddit! you fucking faggots
1 THAD_K_CUNDERTHOCK 2018-09-12
All I see from the MSM and now from Reddit are attempts to silence people based on what they think and what they are researching - not based on any calls for violence or harassment. This will backfire, because it's wrong.
1 LesPatriotes1837 2018-09-12
voat.co/v/theawakening is the new official GA! Spread the word!
1 The_Ruffneck 2018-09-12
It just pushes people to 4chan
1 Shadowulfen 2018-09-12
where are the 4 han drops though, cant find em
1 hoeskioeh 2018-09-12
because they are on 8ch.net
here is the latest as of now
1 sgtpepper901 2018-09-12
Can someone explain to.me what that sub was?
1 GodEmperorScorch 2018-09-12
The liberal femocrats are fully triggered.
1 4Gracchus 2018-09-12
War with Syria incoming. All alternative views on their coming false flags must be silenced.
1 SIGHR 2018-09-12
TRUST THE PLAN GUYZ FUTURE PROVES PAST DONT YOU REMEMBER? Q STORM STILL HAPPENING SO WHATS THE problem?
1 crudos_na 2018-09-12
Thank the gods that r/GreatAwackening/ escaped! lol......
1 Arcsmithoz 2018-09-12
wtf
1 dues-vult 2018-09-12
GAB.ai
1 bennysanders 2018-09-12
https://www.infowars.com
1 SpikeUSA 2018-09-12
Makes you wonder what kind of pressure the deep state goons use to get this done. Looks more and more like civil war is coming.
They could have banned users who make violent threats or other trespasses. This is definitely political.
RICO indictments should be made quickly.
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
Didn't Q say there won't be civil war? I think the whole point of running the Q psyop is to prepare the public, at least some of us for what is coming. Whoever is behind this knows that if they just indict and prosecute the DOJ and FBI leadership that'll it'll look like Trump has pulled off a coup. That would simply play into the belief system of those possessed by the Trump derangement syndrome. I mean, it still will regardless but at least there will be those of us who can try and talk down our friends off the proverbial ledges they'll be screaming from.
1 SpikeUSA 2018-09-12
Jeez, I don't know. Now it looks like the neocons have taken over and we're going to take out Assad and Iran and confront Russia over Ukraine.
But re: civil war, it could go the other way, we get a leftist fascist dictator and the red states rebel (maybe CA too).
Really tricky. peace, bro
1 HongPong 2018-09-12
it will never cease to amaze me how many people are committed to the idea of hanging around on chatboards controlled by giant corporations and expect they won't have problems. It is not impossible to run your own forums and yet nobody bothers. hmm
1 PlaayBall 2018-09-12
There was an influx of new accounts that were making anti-semetic statements and using "hate speech", "harassment", and "calls for violence". I'm willing to wager that these accounts were nothing more than proxies of /r/TheBanout2018 used to initiate the ban.
It's pretty simple really.
The way the banning works:
Gather powermods
Determine which subs you want eradicated.
Find a bunch of (potentially fake) subs with alt-right content.
Infiltrate the subs and post content that can be deemed "hate speech, calls for violence, etc" while simultaneously using bots to mass flag posts.
The sub gets banned and the Banout rolls on to the next one.
During the process all subreddits associated with the bans are now viewed as "hateful" as are their users. The intent is to not only ban all these subs, but to also get the users banned from conversing on as many subs as possible.
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
Yup, we've seen this before. It's basically a social media-false flag attack that gives pretext to ban.
1 blowtheroofoff 2018-09-12
yet the twin sub the_greatawakening is still up
1 KING_OF_THE_SHILLZ 2018-09-12
I think they were banned because they were inciting violence toward politicians and people they disagreed with politically.
honestly i saw it coming for a while with that sub. so many sitewide rule violations there, i knew it was only a matter of time.
1 QMS235 2018-09-12
What rules could they have possibly broken? They stayed confined to their sub entirely, never advocated for brigade government, and were very clear that they had no racist opinions (patriots don’t have a skin color ideas). I really wonder what the justification was.
1 fuckeverywhoreson 2018-09-12
Gotta love that rapper's logic.
​
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
Let's start talking about a coordinated response.
Memes?
Contacting reddit's executives, board members, and advertisers?
Coordinating a legal action by all the people they are banning without any reason?
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
just search for trump and hang and mass report to the admins, fuck them and fuck reddit
1 Shit_in_a_Shoe 2018-09-12
Nope it's banned too now lol.
1 ToddWhiskey 2018-09-12
Bam! Gone as well.
1 Collusion_illusion 2018-09-12
go to the_mueller right now and search for hang. and yet they still exist.
on a side note, if you do this feel free to report as many assholes as you can to the admins
1 MeetMeInJersey 2018-09-12
You're delusional. It was a nightmare in there full of racists. Should've been banned sooner
1 Vagbloodwhitestuff 2018-09-12
What are some ultra left subs?
1 Z0MGbies 2018-09-12
First, The left aren't racist terrorists like those at GA. You're not right wing, so the left isn't your opposite.
You're disgusting filth that both the left and right spit on.
1 WhiskeyStr8Up 2018-09-12
Yes, Wasn't it just yesterday or the day before that they cracked 70000? T_D is too big to ban, but they shut this one down before it got too big. Interesting choice for a "LOL Conspiracy" sub.
1 sideofbutterplease 2018-09-12
What possible legal action could there be?
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
That's how monopolies work. Do you think the water company can shut your water off if you're a Republican?
1 eaglejm 2018-09-12
As i said show the reasons for the ban, I am on there enough to know in general how the board is run and I did not see things that would result in a board level ban.
1 Stitchface 2018-09-12
Yeah I wouldn't be too worried about that.
1 SIGHR 2018-09-12
my thoughts as well, keep the retards in the cage
1 mbassani91 2018-09-12
Is that supposed to help your case? A public website that can be edited by anyone to say literally anything? I guess laziness is the least of your problems. Carry on.
1 Dwighty1 2018-09-12
The thing all of you are missing is that reddit is a private company that gets to decide what they want to publish on their website.
Free speech doesn't mean you can send an article to a newspaper and force them to publish it.
1 ThatOneGuy4321 2018-09-12
“They banned my incoherent echo chamber!
IT MUST MEAN I’M RIGHT!”
1 LoveYacht 2018-09-12
"Narrative" sounds appropriate for the veracity of Q's claims
https://www.reddit.com/r/Qult_Headquarters/comments/93v1ui/a_noncomprehensive_timeline_of_qs_failed/?utm_source=reddit-android
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsh_v._Alabama
1 Therealcodyg 2018-09-12
Nice. Confirmed left leaning reddit users CAN be banned. Ergo this ‘reddit is anti-right’ conspiracy has been debunked. Thank you for your service.
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
I've noticed, this was my first subscription on reddit and have seen it decline first hand...Then the GA brought back real truth seeking.
1 jdotg 2018-09-12
Why would the admins tell you who they banned? Thats pretty unrprecedented.
Most mod teams dont speak on judgement they've made regarding users other than yourself.
In other words, im calling bullshit on your comment.
1 fuckingredditpr0n 2018-09-12
Explain.
1 Pyro_Cat 2018-09-12
A boy and his dog reference? Where the hell am I? Take your upvote.
1 houghjh0 2018-09-12
Hey man thank you for posting this, I’m sorry for sounding like an idiot here, but could you maybe enlighten me on what kind of stuff was discussed on GA. I haven’t ever seen it but I am very curious as to what is going down right now
1 sadmep 2018-09-12
Get better film watching buddies to talk film with, problem solved :) jk, I know what you mean though.
1 jimbojones230 2018-09-12
Pack it up, friend...you’ve already lost.
1 timstolt1 2018-09-12
It would be nice if there were some form of justice, instead of just fascism, even if it is "privately owned". These companies like to act all democratic...until something goes against their narrative.
Reddit for you
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
Gotcha, thanks
1 jdotg 2018-09-12
Who fucking cares, but you just admitted to using alternate accounts? Not le'sharpest, are you?
Thank you tho
1 timstolt1 2018-09-12
Oy Vey! You stop that!
1 DeepPast 2018-09-12
Luckily for you you can make such bullshit claims now because it’s all gone.
If Q is such bullshit, why would you hang around the sub long enough to know what sort of things were being discussed?
“Because it’s hilarious”... save it. You must be a really sad soul.
1 superfluid 2018-09-12
OMG my sides
1 Jediknightluke 2018-09-12
crickets
1 AutoModerator 2018-09-12
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 jdotg 2018-09-12
Hey a top mind user.
But no they dont harass people.
1 jdotg 2018-09-12
No. Thanks for showing up.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
Well it's on the internet so it must be true!
Fucking ignorant boomers believing everything you read.
1 ___jamil___ 2018-09-12
please link to one. I read through about 2-3 pages worth of comments and didn't see any calls for violence.
1 pilgrimboy 2018-09-12
Sounds like banning S8n rather than the sub would have been a wise course of action. I've been at work all day and didn't see any of it.
1 yourenotserious 2018-09-12
Well... if you want to lynch his political opponents (which Awakening was a big fan of) then yea. You're a fascist.
1 a_full_empty 2018-09-12
i mean the guy got caught photoshopping a picture of airforce one to use as evidence that he is really in the president's inner circle, but yeah sure this shit show getting banned totally gives him tons of credibility.
1 anonymoushero1 2018-09-12
you're supposed to support policies and ideas, not individuals.
so yes, blind support of a man regardless of what he does or says is un-American and deserving of contempt.
1 anonymoushero1 2018-09-12
Sure, right after you point me to the article that says you're not a moron.
See how that works?
1 mbassani91 2018-09-12
Counterproductive like a guy who uses his 8 hour work day to browse cryptic posts from anonymous 4 Chan users?
1 mbassani91 2018-09-12
Nothing says productivity like reading through an entire thread just to tell someone your unsolicited opinion.
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
Evil on both sides. Watch the Doc "Conspiracy of Silence" The Elite Deep State Cabal has people on the left and the right.
300,000 kids in the US are prostituted every year, and over 2 million world wide.
Stay asleep and keep dreaming if you please.
1 delelles 2018-09-12
All the people from even slightly controversial subs need to know to go to Voat immediately after the sub is inevitably banned.
The mods of banned subs have done a great disservice to their members by not having a back-up plan in place.
1 Dave-C 2018-09-12
Same group that support "Q anon" are the some ones confused by journalists using "sources."
1 CorDra2011 2018-09-12
That was my second point. Reddit hasn't actually banned any of the users(tbf to my knowledge at least). You're all still perfectly able to voice your views here for example. Or why don't you go to The_Donald for example. Plenty of other places on reddit will tolerate you rn.
But yeah I'd be fine if reddit banned me totally as well.
1 suprmario 2018-09-12
He was being facetious...
1 liberal_artist 2018-09-12
r/politics, etc routinely post violent fantasies involving what they would do to trump and republicans.
1 RowdyPants 2018-09-12
If universal agreement that something is stupid is proof it's true then you should go spam your cock in a door, everyone says it's stupid so they MUST be hiding something!
1 Diabolus-Ex-Machina 2018-09-12
They harassed me with their opinions REEEE
1 SIGHR 2018-09-12
not an argument
1 timstolt1 2018-09-12
Are you anti-Semitic? I happen to be a Jew who doesn't stand for the zionist *%$&# that half my nation spews. To deny JIDF, share blue, CTR, etc, is the mark of a tool.
1 jdr420777 2018-09-12
Lmfao that's called DISCRIMINATION. And has nothing to do with freedom of speech on privately operated websites, which is what we are talking about. What are you even talking about???
You need to go refresh yourself on the definitions of the legal words you are using because you are 100% wrong in what you are saying.
Or better yet just literally google "does private companies require free speech" and you'll see multiple articles and even case law and scholars explaining it.
But you dont want to learn any facts you would rather spew misinformation and damn right lies.
I've explained why you're wrong but it just goes put one ear and out the other. I used to think like you in regards to the 1st amendment. Turns out I was wrong just like you are.
It's actually very very specific about what is free speech. It doesnt apply to everything no matter how bad you want it to.
1 ApugalypseNow 2018-09-12
Dewey Beats Truman
1 ObviousAltisObvious_ 2018-09-12
Only leftist shills exist. That's it. End of story. All right wing people are the perfect humans and patriots.
1 Unkn0wn77777771 2018-09-12
Can you explain to me the S8n issue? I am completely out of the loop on this.
1 WooTs_67 2018-09-12
Its like all your doing is coming over to this sub and harassing its users. Seems like TMOR incites harassment. A reason that two of those subs were banned.
1 TheShrinkingGiant 2018-09-12
Unjust. Enrichment.
Geez... keep up.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
That's the opposite of true. President Trump has been all over twitter calling viewpoint discrimination on social media illegal.
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
The value that reddit has collected from my use of their site. Reddit gold and ad revenue.
1 Venadore 2018-09-12
still dodging the point, cunt
1 Pyehole 2018-09-12
I'm with you brother. I don't even register an emotional reaction when the sleeping angry sheep come to bleat at us nor does it affect me when the shills pile on. The longer it goes on the more people start to notice that things are not as they seem. We cant force people to take the red pill, we just have to wait for others to get there themselves. The actions of the desperate to stop this process only serve to hasten it.
1 irrelevantappelation 2018-09-12
Haha, so close I can see the whites of their eyes.
1 JamesColesPardon 2018-09-12
Removed. Rule 10.
1 GumdropGoober 2018-09-12
You write like a psycho, lol.
1 JamesColesPardon 2018-09-12
Rule 4.
1 abcdavis 2018-09-12
sounds like you are just lonely.
1 Herculius 2018-09-12
No they weren't. Talking about indictments "around the corner" or even military tribunals, however misguided it may be, is not a "call or incitement of violence. They were talking about political and legal processes they think will happen or would like to see happen. That isn't advocating anyone go murder or inflict criminal violence on anyone.
1 Murgie 2018-09-12
Lol, from what? They were an image hosting site that people only used to link directly to images.
1 Buy_The-Ticket 2018-09-12
I was being facetious.
1 DJBlu-Ray 2018-09-12
Hey man, can you give me the link that has all of the Q posts archived?
Now I'm curious to dig in a little deeper into it. I wanna see what is ruffling so many feathers.
​
1 Fooomanchu 2018-09-12
So then I presume you also agree that r/ politics should be banned?
Similar comments (like this: https://i.imgur.com/6NRsGT0.jpg) are posted there on a daily basis.
1 shanyboye 2018-09-12
"These people are stupid" is a Q saying which, used in this context, likely is saying Reddit is stupid. Banning all these subs at once indicates the ban was political rather than in response to real issues. Sessions is going to lay the anti-trust hammer down on these big tech companies colluding as a cartel to manipulate the political landscape.
1 wile_e_chicken 2018-09-12
Even Bob.
1 CelineHagbard 2018-09-12
Removed. Rule 4.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2018-09-12
You mean YOUR mother's basement. OH!
1 take-to-the-streets 2018-09-12
They banned the rest of the subs because they are spin-offs of the original GA and CBTS_Stream. That’s how reddit bans work. No spinoffs allowed. Stop being a paranoid loser and think objectively here.
1 DoingTimeOnMapleDr 2018-09-12
Well said. If anything it makes you dig into the news and see how certain events are related. We wouldn't want people thinking for themselves now would we?
1 bBAMEr 2018-09-12
qmap.pub/indictments
1 gonewildinvt 2018-09-12
This read was sooooo hilarious, I honestly couldn't stop laughing ;-) All the best and who said anything about Q...not I. Judicial Watch, William Binny and other whistleblowers on the other hand have held detailed discussions on the topic. Thanks for the laugh though well worth the read :-)
1 shanyboye 2018-09-12
Retooling CDA 230's another possible avenue. CDA 230 lets Reddit curate content like a publisher, due to the "good samaritan" provision, let Reddit's not liable for content. I'm not a lawyer, but perhaps there's some way to bake in protection for non-inciting political speech.
1 Rakhoon 2018-09-12
What about the subreddits on the list they plan to get banned in the future?
1 TheHighBlatman 2018-09-12
No dude clearly I'm there for the balls, ducks, and jizz.
The reason I'm treating you like this is cuz we've literally been talking for a day and you have only been annoying and pestering. I don't need to fucking splay myself and prove to you who I am.
1 DHAYNES07 2018-09-12
The problem with Antifa is, they go to events ready to brawl, masked up and ready to start violance. They destroy public and private property, as well as beat people up even if they are just civilians, yet if they truly believe in anti fascism they shouldn't hide their faces.
That is why they are classified as a domestic terror organisation, even Nancy Pelosi, minority leader of the Democrats condemned them.
Most importantly, those on the right side of politics who are causing violance, they should be arrested and suffer the consequences of the law as well. There was so many posts and comments on r/TheGreatAwakening board that spoke of not going down the violant path, and condemning and down voting violant Inflaming posts. I really doubt the reasons given for the banning of that sub. When you see the Q followers at trumps rally, there not wearing masks, they are holding cardboard signs.
The fact they kept The Donald but got rid of TGA.... The Donald is a much more wild and aggressive subreddit than TGA ever was.
1 thirdstreetzero 2018-09-12
Respect is earned, bud. Remember this thread when you can figure out why no one takes you seriously.
1 JumbledFun 2018-09-12
So which one is it?
1 Fooomanchu 2018-09-12
I only looked for about 30 seconds. Have some more.
http://archive.is/30oOP Endorsing “dropping bodies”
http://archive.is/7xKxO "What degree of illegal is it to kill the president elect?"
http://archive.is/GDnoy "Alright CIA, this American citizen is okay with the "Kennedy treatment"
http://magaimg.net/img/61s6.png “I’d get rid of the Christians in a heartbeat”
https://i.imgur.com/sFyJTGU.jpg I’ve got my bat ready to go to knock Maga hats off heads”
https://i.redd.it/6nyohk2ump901.png I’d love to see dems start dropping these Fuckers, Beat the old men to death
https://imgur.com/vSEEoIi I would support the assassination of members of Congress who voted yes
https://imgur.com/qyLiTtY If congress does nothing I say need for violent and blood revolution
https://imgur.com/DjV1RCV (Of congress)Their house should be burned to the ground
https://i.redd.it/z9yotzwl6ea11.png Any two Republicans go down, they can’t seat judge, Everybody knows how to stop them
https://i.redd.it/my7v9r48n9dy.png Hopefully the CIA offs Bannon
https://i.redd.it/txcqjlq1br9z.jpg Kushner should be executed for treason, All Americans defending him traitors
https://i.reddituploads.com/b0a9bf644fbe4351b77607c71e3c3ab2?fit=max&h=1536&w=1536&s=4e4c566c70cd137d1ae5b3a7ae0cf186 Endorsing destruction of Trump supporters property
http://archive.is/ggsdO I'm encouraging people to buy rifles so they can resist Trump when he comes for you
1 Adarcer 2018-09-12
Quick question since that post originated from 8chan, what makes you think It violated redits TOS, or even twitters ? This is some "Ministry of Truth -1984" level of suppression here ... hopefully you never question the narrative and actually wake up else your next..
1 Adarcer 2018-09-12
that one got banned to ... all the Q ones did... all conveniently violated the rules at the same time.. here is a list:
1 HelperBot_ 2018-09-12
Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law
HelperBot v1.1 /r/HelperBot_ I am a bot. Please message /u/swim1929 with any feedback and/or hate. Counter: 212309
1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-09-12
I don't give a single fuck. I have had to work with people that went to Harvard and Yale and billed hundreds of dollars an hour that were complete morons.
You get respect from me when you make an argument that is backed up by facts. And you have done nothing but repeatedly pound your chest about how smart you are, with absolutely no reference to the facts I've given in support of what I said which include: Supreme Court precedent, the opinion of the president, and statements made by the Attorney General of the United States.
Are you fucking serious? You're claiming to be a litigator and you don't know that you can't file a class action without being a licensed attorney?
Tell me more about how stupid I am, genius.