we are with him.

We believe Brett. We believe in due process. The globalist fascist left falsely claim the moral high ground, but they are systematically being exposed.

Let them continue to stall, let's allow more ridiculous allegations to come to the surface. Let's give them all the rope they need.

The truth always wins

Does the guy who supports torture get to claim the moral high ground?

You didn't read the actual case did you?

Another one sentence prophet from Wikipedia here to tell us all the facts!!!

Look up his actual part in it before you spout lunacy please.

What case? I’m talking about multiple issues. He refused to comment under oath on whether or not water boarding is torture. On the DC court of appeals he supported indefinite detention of American citizens with little to no evidence. He signed onto a judgment that blocked wrongfully detained prisoners who were tortured from being able to sue the private contractors that tortured them. Unfortunately these proceedings haven’t been transparent enough to know just how involved he was in Bush’s overriding of previously in place torture laws but what we do know is he holds the neocon position on illegal detention and torture everywhere he’s on record.

The disappearing people section, you read up on it?

You'd see his stance on it if you did, but what you're stating is not his stance. So I'm under the assumption you haven't read it and found your information through news articles released in the last week or on Wikipedia.

In fact, you've kinda bastardized his stance on a few issues. It's a lot easier to destroy a neocon if you just tell the actual truth of their work...or at least it used to when this sub was anti-war.

https://www.justsecurity.org/60731/rear-admiral-hutson-oppose-kavanaugh-torture/

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

"I don't think I can speak on that" = supports torture.

I'm done, give me something that's at least a week old and supports the claims purported other than speculation that he will be Trump's lapdog.

So you didn’t read it. Good research. And that’s a very simple question for anyone to answer: is water boarding torture? Yes. Next question.

What did Kavanaugh say when asked that?

I quoted that part of the article you sent you silly ass child. You're making a speculation with your last two sentences without providing evidence he plans to Kickstart Trump's torture program.

Find me information before this week that discusses his record with the Bush administration. I've seen a good chunk thanks to a post I made searching for the information.

You are quoting Trump and attributing it to Kavanaugh, like you see that. Now connect the two with sources that basically state that he is planning to start the program.

Like I said. I will wait, but if you jerk me around again, I won't stand by and listen to the speculation and fear laden theories of yours.

Let me ask you this: if a man was placed under oath and asked “is child molestation bad?” And he answered by saying “I don’t think I can speak on that?” what would you think of that?

And you are very worked up. Lots of name calling and personal attacks. No wonder you like Kavanaugh. You seem to be as defensive and hysterically temperamental as he is.

I'm not worked up, I'm confused by your blathering.

Was he asked that during the hearing? And was it relevant to the Ford accusation? I've quoted it from an article and your article didn't state it was from the hearing.

Dude I don't give a shit about Kavanaugh lol, you just haven't proved any of the claims you've set out to prove. You've just set up hypotheticals? You have to actually prove shit to prove a conspiracy theory.

Don't say I'm worked up, I actually don't care for this conversation. Answer the shit you set out to answer or don't expect a reply back. I don't have to spend the time engaging with you lol, I'm just surprised how ignorant you are and like seeing how deep it goes.

Ha.. nice 5 paragraphs to say how much you don’t care and how much you aren’t worked up... sad.

I'm not going to answer your non-answers lol, that's not how debates work. I asked you something and stated that I would like more information to which you started asking a hypothetical question about child molestation (to which you assumed I support pizzagater/Trump supporter with that)

You have still refrained from answering or providing evidence to your original claim.

So answer first and then I'll entertain your silly shit. I'll answer all your hypothetical questions and moral quandaries, as long as you provide evidence to your original claim like I've asked for continually.

Until then, I'm just going to to assume this is a troll sent to waste my time and will treat it as such.

The truth is Kavanaugh is against abortion rights and has a horrific environmental record. He acts like a chauvinist and has *four* very credible charges of sexual assault against him by professional women who have a ton to lose by bringing such claims forward.

​

Let's find a better human being for this lifetime appointment.

lol not even going to bother trying to counter this. Go smoke some more weed

Right, I wonder why the troll "won't bother to respond."

Because your read of the issue is different than anyone who is moderate and/or right leaning.

He won't respond because he knows you'll repeat your original comment ad nauseum. It's a game now, don't you see what we've created in this shithole together?

No, my post just stated basic facts. Your post completely lacked substance. Who are you trolling on behalf of?

It's a fact that Kavanaugh believes Trump's above the law? How would you even know that? If it's not an assumption or speculation I'd prefer you show your work.

Also, I've heard the rumor he is against roe vs Wade, but haven't seen the information from him to corroborate that, however I've seen buttons on protestors saying it.

You should seriously listen to yourself when you spew blatant bullshit, or provide sources to those 'facts' you think you speak.

Removed. Rule 10.

Is there a theory here? This dude is a loser.

The crybaby judge.

Word. I'm not conservative so I'm not a fan of this guy. And the rape stuff doesnt really help his case.

Are you a fan of Pokemon? Pokemon Duel to be exact?

Are you a fan of Pokemon?

No, why did you delete your last comment and then ask the same question.

I understand the skepticism but I find it hard to believe that 3 or 4 women would accuse him. I also found it hard to believe Cosby was a rapist until enough stories came out. Look, I know Democrats are milking this for all they got. But the last supreme court nomination didnt get this. If Democrats hired people to make this all up then why not the first guy? I dont think those ladies are lying. I think the dude is a creep.

I gotcha. I just disagree. I dont think this is manufactured. Gorsuch got by just fine. He wasnt a creep. I think Kavanaugh just might be a creep. That's my opinion, but I can respect yours.

Gorsuch was replacing a conservative judge, Kavanaugh will be replacing a moderate judge. Only this nomination will change the slant of the SC, I don't think the two can be compared like that.

Hey same to you man. I'm pretty sure the guy is gonna get confirmed anyway. This is kinda payback for the Democrats because Mitch stalled a supreme court nomination for a whole fuckin year. So we are trying to do the same and hope to take more seats so we can keep stalling. I know its lame but politics is a bitch. Anyway, take care man and good luck to you guys.

Because the first guy was a moderate replacing a moderate. This is a conservative coming in, the Dems biggest enemy.

I don't lie. Most people I know don't lie. Kavanaugh clearly lies. Four witness with very believable testimony... come on, man.

Which lies are clear to you?

That he doesn't remember the alleged incidents, for starters. The Young Turks has been covering this well; check out their coverage, with video of the hearings. And watch Ford's testimony, if you have a chance. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KMfETp5w3w

The Young Turks?? Help me out here. What is the equally unacceptable source from the other side? Are you going to cite Snopes next?

I mean, i wouldn't remember something someone else made up/fabricated.

Kavanaugh clearly lies.

This is pretty dumb to say, because it isn't clear at all. He seems like a choir boy, straight shooter to me.

You raped me and several others here. They will comment soon accusing you of rape. Surely you will be demanding an FBI investigation into yourself immediately. You rapist.

When did it become a liberal position that you call people crybabies when they show emotion? "Real men don't cry" is such a stereotypical, sexist redneck stance that I'm having trouble taking you seriously.

One guy saying something doesn't make it a "liberal thing." That'd be like me saying "when did it become a conservative position to call sexual assault victims lying skanks" because some conservative Fox News contributor did that the other day.

Except liberal media and liberal posters have made a big deal about how cringe it is that the man cried during his testimony. It is so opposite of what I was raised to believe was a liberal stance that I understand why normal people are walking away.

Can you link to some liberal media that's done that?

Take a step of you high horse dude. I made fun of a guy who looked like a bumbling idiot. You would do the same if you didnt love the guy.

I don't "love" the guy but I agree with OP that you people think it is ok to make fun of a man crying for himself, family and country. I thought men were allowed to cry now.

My bad I didnt realize people were so sensitive.

I doubt that statement. Your hypocrisy rings true tho.

Where was the hypocrisy again?

Happens on this sub all day, except the lowbrow conservative jokes seem to get 20-40 upvotes on average to the others.

There's a real aisle blindness in this sub, and the only ones who pretend it doesn't exist are these left leaning users.

Both parties don't talk, they seek dirt and fight now.

Whenever the person they're attacking has been labeled the enemy...it's why they can call em crybabies, retards, and other silly things that damage the soul of their idealogy.

You thought it was cool when the guy was crying his eyes out trying to defend himself?

"Cool" in what sense? I appreciate that he is human and had gone through 30+ hours of testimony while being falsely accused of something that has been so detrimental to his family and himself for this ridiculous racket that the dems are pushing. A normal person should fucking cry. For fucks sake, he's dedicated his life to enabling true due process for accusers and defendants alike because he believes in the order of law and he ends up being the one that suffers the worst for the failings of the system- on a public stage.

Only a moron would not cry.

I would be crying if that were me. Watching what a mockery of democracy this all is is enough to make a good person of either gender break down. Fuck. Half these people think it's cool to let your son pretend he's a girl and get him on hormones!

If Judge K was in a dress and sobbing theatrically as a trans could we make fun of him?

Cool, you clearly like the guy for political reasons. I dont for the same reason. And I think the accusations are valid. So to me he looked like a child trying to defend himself.

Ah, so you don't require any evidence for an accusation so long as you don't like the person's politics. Sounds great!

Theres a good amount of evidence here and Ford was super credible during the hearing.

She doesn't remember before or after, the people she says were there say they weren't and her own family that lives in the neighborhood won't vouch for her or show up with her at court. What do you find credible?

Her testimony was super credible. Amd now the FBI is investigating. So good luck champ. I'm doubtful he lasts past this week.

"Super credible"

Funny how there wasn't two doors at the Safeway that she told about back then. Also weird that she doesn't remember how she got to a party that no one else remembers. Also strange that she is a doctor in psychology and has never had a conversation about passing a polygraph test.

I know it's super frustrating when you're a big Q fan because absolutley nobody has gotten arrested like he promised. But chill out man. Kavanaugh is a bitch and it's hilarious that you're defending him so hard.

Have I brought Q into this? Can you please respond to my comment without sliding me. This feels like virtual rape and I ask that you stop it.

I will present you my comment again so that you can redeem yourself and respond as a normal human:

"Super credible"

Funny how there wasn't two doors at the Safeway that she told about back then. Also weird that she doesn't remember how she got to a party that no one else remembers. Also strange that she is a doctor in psychology and has never had a conversation about passing a polygraph test.

Hahahahahahaha

So, you've worn out? I won?

You can keep going if you like.

No need. You showed your cards and I'm off shift now. The Russians don't like to pay overtime.

Gotcha, take care pimp.

She doesn't remember when it happened. She doesn't remember where it happened. She doesn't remember who all was there. All witnesses she has named have denied or contradicted her story.

Could you please show me this "evidence" and explain what you mean by "credible?"

The downvotes are cute. I dont remember every high school party either. But I would certainly remember when somebody tried to rape me.

"Cute".

That's right.

So you would remember the where, when, and who if you were subjective to sexual assault? Because Ford couldn't remember anything about it.

I don't know why you're getting upset with downvotes, has nothing to do with me. Although, you do have a history of enjoying accusations without evidence.

You clearly are downvoting all my comments which is hilarious. I'm not insecure enough to reciprocate. But Ford gave a credible testimony and the FBI is going to investigate. We'll see what happens.

I haven't downvoted a single one of your comments, actually. Someone else could be, and whoever that is is immature.

I see that you're a student of the Democrat playbook though. You clearly cannot defend your argument or explain how a testimony where Ford could not remember the time, place, or participants is credible. Therefore you make up an allegation accusing me if downvoting your comments with no evidence to support your claim.

Ooooo scary Democrats.

A loser who is being appointed to the SCOTUS. I'd love to see your accomplishments compared to his rofl. Fuckin Reddit man, so amusing.

Wow...

Go ahead and answer if you like.

Did he say when he worked at the Safeway? That’s the key to pinning down the date of the party in question. The rest of this doesn’t matter. The FBI will focus on corroborating the claims from Ford.

Perjury is definitely the riskiest trap but it starts with a timeline. That was the basis of the R attack and effort to discredit. Ford set the seed to define the date with the Judge encounter at the Safeway? he worked at during a summer. That would zero in on the date of the party and would require witnesses to confirm or deny something more specific, then it’s easier to catch people in lies. Generic dates are easily brushed off with I don’t recall.

Nothing about this is easy and I doubt it will produce anything concrete. The only thing that will push it forward is zeroing in on the actual date. The crumb to do that that was put on the record i.e. the uncomfortable encounter with Judge at his summer job.

Regardless of the outcome the various senators will have to make a risk call, suffer the Trump core revolt or the flip floppy independent. Right now that’s a coin toss and could go either way based on the interviews or any new revelations.

No doubt. See you around and have a good weekend.

The FBI will focus on corroborating the claims from Ford.

More like the holes in her tall tale will be further exposed.

• Isn’t it a fact that you don’t know where or when this purported assault happened?

• Isn’t it a fact that you can’t tell us how you got there?

• You just know the house was several miles from your home, but it is a fact, is it not, that you can’t tell us how you got home?

• You’ve told us that you were terrified running out of the house after the attack, but you can’t tell us who rescued you and drove you away?

• You remember 36 years ago that you had exactly one beer at the party, you remember hearing your alleged attackers go downstairs, you remember exactly the route you took to get out of the house, yet you can’t tell us what happened after you left the house?

• So, you’re sure the party happened, but you can’t say when it happened, you can’t say where it happened, you don’t know how you got there, you don’t know how you got home, and every person you’ve identified as a witness says that they have no memory of the party and that they never saw Brett Kavanaugh act the way you’ve described, isn’t that right?

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/09/republicans-should-not-have-delayed-the-kavanaugh-vote/

That’s quite possible but you have to account for others actually confirming parts of her story once they are across from an FBI agent.

And if they can zero in on the timeline it will put more pressure on those secondary (and primary) witnesses.

but you have to account for others actually confirming parts of her story once they are across from an FBI agent.

As opposed to these "others" who were already contacted by the MSM and offered money for their stories? Being contacted by law enforcement will now loosen their lips? Good luck with that

If that’s true then sure it will come out. But the fact they were pushing for a broader investigation from the beginning certainly isn’t in line with them bribing them beforehand.

They only side resisting a formal investigation was Kavanaugh’s side. They seem to fear official statements more.

If that’s true then sure it will come out.

What?

them bribing

What?

They seem to fear official statements more.

lol I guess it probably looks that way to the uninformed

Come on. Everything that’s public is just the standard I don’t recall drivel. He dodged anything specific in the hearing but that won’t be possible with the FBI.

Did he say he worked at Safeway?

Ford referenced a parking lot meeting 6 weeks after with Judge at his summer job. I believe it was Safeway but it may have been something else. Regardless she gave the name of his summer job to put a time reference on the party.

I believe that "Mark" worked at Safeway.

Yes. Ford said that they met at his workplace.

Dude is guilty. If he gets on the court, I will forever hate Republicans and will never ever vote for one again. Ever. It is despicable what they are doing.

Guilty of what?

Drinking heavily in high school and college and lying to Congress about it. Maaaaaaybe even sexual assault, but I'm not going to jump to conclusions on that one.

He drank a lot of beer as a kid and said as much. Often. When did he lie?

Lying about remembering everything from nights he would get obliterated.

Lying about remembering everything from nights he would get obliterated.

He didn't say that. He said he didn't blackout.

Which was a lie. Anyone who has ever drank as much as he said he did has blacked out. Especially if he was 17.

Posted from the office of Diane Feinstein.

What? You're not making any sense to me.

He’s calling you a shill. Isn’t that against the rules?

Wrong.

Says you? Please.

Not everyone blacks out.

I'm aware. Thanks for your professional input.

Are you? Because you seem to be 100% sure that he did and is lying about it.

I don't think 100%, but his actions make me believe he did. Someone is lying, and Ford has nothing to gain in doing so but BK has everything to lose.

Ok, how do you know that? How can you speak so authoritatively on a matter? You a drink expert?

Just because God rolled a constitution score of 8 for you doesn't mean it's the same for everyone else.

God did nothing for me. He doesn't even exist.

^can't recognize pop culture and/or humor.

Should have guessed based on your no nonsense every man is guilty of rape mentality.

That's not my mentality. And I never once said he was guilty of rape. I THINK he MAY be. That's not my judgment to make.

Didn't stop talking from spreading it though.

What?

Oh sorry, Didn't stop 'you' from spreading it though.

I missed the word "you", is English your first language or third?

I'm about to. Just got out of the shower. Of course I had to see your response because I wasn't sure what point you were trying to make. English is my 1st. Unfortunately I was born and raised in America. But what exactly am I spreading? I didn't say he was guilty of rape or sexual assault once. I said he might be but that he is most definitely a liar and guilty of something. That's it.

He may not be guilty of this! By God damnit he is guilty of something!!

You and Nixon apparently..

Remember when everyone said trump wasn't guilty of having an affair with Stormy? Well gosh, the denial was strong there. Seems that he lied. But everyone is so quick to deny that Fords accusations could be real. Maybe this time you should consider it might be the fucking truth for once.

Apples and oranges.

I never doubted the sleazeball in Chief slept with a pornstar.

How about you prove something, anything, and perhaps I'll start leaning your way and see 'your' truth. You've shown me you're nothing but a partisan sycophant thus far, but I'm still waiting for a glimmer of something other than an accusation that even her chosen witnesses don't remember lol.

we get it your crazy

And not rape, just sexual assault.

Last accuser bumped it up. Where ya been?

Why are you unable to understand that not everyone who drinks beer gets blackout drunk and sexually assaults girls? Seems like projecting more than anything else. No evidence has been provided showing guilt of sexual assault, and all of Ford's witnesses have contradicted her story.

What I'm hearing from you is that you need no evidence to believe an allegation as long as you disagree with the defendant's politics. I fear for the future of this country.

I'm not unable. And I'm not projecting. I also never said he was guilty of sexual assault but that he might be. Why can't people just read my comment and not twist my words? I need evidence before I accuse someone of something that serious. I said he was guilty of lying about his drinking, and he's probably lying about other stuff, but I never said he was guilty of the assault.

So you don't understand that it's possible to drink beer and not blackout? Especially since he has a weak stomach and was not able to drink very much before vomiting? Seems consistent to me.

Exactly- the guy lied several times, not just about drinking but about the meanings of things in his year book. He lied under oath, even if he didn’t commit the assault that alone should disqualify him from the Supreme Court. His whole testimony showed him to be a terrible choice for that position and that’d be true even if he didn’t have multiple sexual assault allegations against him.

I've never blacked out, and have drank quite heavily. Your absolutist statement is silly and incorrect.

From beer? Is it even possible to get blackout drunk from beer?

I've blacked out from beer.

Blacked out or passed out? Honestly, in all my experience I've only known people to puke and fall asleep from too much beer. I've never in my 50 years seen someone blackout from beer and be capable of raping someone without knowing or remembering it.

Just because you don't know anyone personally or haven't seen it yourself doesn't mean it doesn't happen. When people binge drink and do lots of keg stands/beer bongs and play drinking games like beer pong or quarters some people black out. I do.

I'm waiting for a fit, healthy male to show us that he can get blackout drunk from beer and not be simply puking. A 97 lb female that hasn't eaten, is coming down with the flu and is about to start menstruating? Sure, maybe. But there simply is not enough alcohol in beer to blackout a (160?) lb male that is healthy. Check the blood alcohol charts.

I disagree. And your example is disgusting. Why even bring menstruating into it? If he has never blacked out, why wouldn't he just say no? Instead he decided to ask a senator if she ever blacked out. He was a mess up there. Someone's word is only as good as they way they defend it. I just don't believe him.

Science is disgusting now? Hormonal changes due to regular menstrual cycles can influence the way alcohol is metabolized greatly. As does weight, how much food you've consumed, medication you're on, whether you are fighting a virus, even race.

I went to high school with a couple really tiny Filapino girls that were sisters and they could definitely get falling down stupid drunk at a regular house party. But that isn't Kav or other size/weight/health males that we're talking about.

Not science, just the way you worded it in your original comment. Like little menstrating girls are the only ones who black out from binge drinking beer. I don't disagree that its tougher for an active Male to get black out drunk, but that doesn't make it impossible.

Well, I don't like how you just worded "little, menstruating girls." Size, weight and menstruating are just human body things and how the impact your ability to black out on beer is just chemistry and science.

I'm aware of all that. But watch a guy bong 6 beers in a row, puke, can't talk correctly, and tell me that he will remember every little detail from that night. I call bullshit. We don't even know HOW MUCH he drank and if it was just beer anyways. Do we know he didn't have anything other than that? I put more of my beliefs on position of this matter into the testimonies and the way they both behaved before I would undoubtedly believe anything that he denied or she accused. Actions speak much greater volumes than words.

You are a science-denier when it suits your feels. We get it.

Nope. I don't deny science. But you clearly seem to know just exactly how much alcohol BK drank and whether or not he blacked out. You say he can't off beer, I simply disagree. If you provided me with evidence that it's just not physically possible for a man his size and shape then I wouldn't deny it. But even with that evidence, it would only lead me to believe that he wasn't blacked out when he assaulted her. That he only did it because he's a piece of shit. Either way doesn't look good for him. And I haven't fully committed to believing that he is guilty but what I've seen and heard leads me to believe he did.

You don't even have credible evidence that he was there.

Typically, when bonging beers then immediately puking, the alcohol does not have time to be metabolized by the body. Basically it just sort of cancels it out, by rejecting it. This is how you can maintain a buzz without getting super blasted drunk.

Please excuse my choice of using the word immediately. Being so drunk a person is puking their guts everywhere almost always implies that person is wasted.

True enough. Wasted, but not capable of rape. Puking and passed out.

I didn't say he raped anyone.

But you are saying that he is a piece of shit because he is lying about being a blackout drunk on beer because you've been blacked out on beer?

Not necessarily. Many people intentionally make themselves puke to keep from getting too wasted. Seen it happen many many times. It’s 8pm, drunk already, band doesn’t start until 11? Puke it out and start over.

I've actually done that before a long long time ago. But to drink more. But if it's already metabolized puking it out won't lower your blood alcohol level, will it?

Not totally, no.

But extremely unlikely. She's the one who was wasted and doesn't remember clearly, that much is clear in and of itself. She can't remember shit!

Clearly? You must be blind and deaf.

Wait! Now you are going after blind and deaf people???? And more anti-science from you. Science tells us that a blind or deaf person would have more reliable perception than someone with full 6 senses in a situation like Ford presents.

You people need more Science in your lives before you try to argue a serious subject like this.

Cool.

you sound retarded

Just because you don't know anyone personally or haven't seen it yourself doesn't mean it doesn't happen. When people binge drink and do lots of keg stands/beer bongs and play drinking games like beer pong or quarters some people black out. I do.

So by that same argument, that doesn’t mean everyone blacks out while drinking mass quantities of beer. Just because you do, doesn’t mean others do too.

I didn't say that everyone did.

But your implying he must have, because he was a drinker.

I'm saying I wouldn't be surprised if he did. And I wasn't intending to imply anything. I'm just saying it's possible. We don't even know he only drank beer. What I want to say is none of us know what BK drank, or even how much he consumed.

Fair enough. We don’t know. We only can go by what he and the others there have said.

Are you on any SSRI’s by chance? Not suppose to drink while taking those, ya know.

Nope. I don't even know what those are but I'm sure Google could tell me

Anti depressants

He lied when he said Devil’s Triangle is a drinking game for one. Everyone knows it’s a threesome with 2 straight guys and a girl. That’s what it means and has always meant and he lied under oath about it even though he knows everyone knows he’s lying. The sheer fucking elitism and arrogance of it. I genuinely think all the people supporting him must be brainwashed or are being paid because it makes no sense why anyone would want that guy on the Supreme Court, not if you’re not part of the so-called elite. I mean, people just can’t have that little self respect to think someone like that deserves to make important decisions about things that could affect your life and the lives of people you love. The partisan bias stuff has gone way way too far when people are clinging to a vile specimen like this. You all know he’s vile, you all know he’d shove over your Granny if they were both going for the last slice of cake because he’s that entitled, you know he lied under oath, you know he has no actual respect for the law or the American people but you’ll defend him anyway just because he’s on ‘your team’ Grow some integrity for fuck’s sake!

Learn paragraphs, child. I've no idea what you children have co-opted our drinking game names from 40 years to mean now, but I'm 100% certain that devils triangle was a fast paced quarters game with the three (usually guys,) people that won quarters.

Christ, slow dancing to Journey was the highlight back then. And I was a "bad girl".

Perjury, he lied under oath by republicans OWN admissions and his he should be impeached from his current position and removed from nomination.

Anyone saying he is guilty raped me.

You can't just throw around baseless rape accusations for every little thing people do that makes you uncomfortable...oh wait

Interesting comment coming from you, daddy.

Remember that time you raped me?

I do

I was there. Got raped too.

Here's the part where I release a "very detailed account" of the incident to the WaPo ending with a statement that I never reported it because I was too ashamed and afraid....but I did tell friends about it over the years and I'm pretty sure I mentioned your name to them.

Now I wait for my story to be corroborated.

OH NO!!! THIS LOOKS LIKE THE DEBILS TRIANGLE I JUST FOUND OUT ABOUT!!

Oh, so it was a homosexual party? Can't recall, but I'll take your word for it.

One word - "chaps"

shit.

Just another swamp creature

When you stop and think about it, there are 4 scenarios/outcomes here.

1) The women are lying and there is an investigation: They are found to be lying, they are arrested, and Kavanaugh gets his name cleared and a seat on the SC.

2) The women are lying but there is no investigation: Kavanugh is pushed through to the court, but a permanent cloud hangs over his reputation because of the unanswered questions and the women can make millions in book deals.

3) Kavanaugh is lying and there is an investigation: The truth is found and he is impeached from his current seat and the women get closure.

4) Kavanaugh is lying but there is no investigation: Kavanaugh gets pushed through to the court and the women have ruined their lives all for naught.

Of those 4, when there is an investigation the liars lose. When their isn't, the liars win. So why is it Kavanaugh doesn't want an investigation?

5) everyone is lying, there is an investigation, but no one can prove or disprove a claim that happened 3 decades ago.

Yep, and the cloud of doubt will remain.

Which in the end, amounts to squat. Clouds don't decide cases.

Would have been a great line if this was an actual trial, but why would I expect conspiracy users to understand that.

I mean that a cloud amounts to nothing relative to a confirmed supreme court justice's authority to decide cases. The Republicans won the right to appoint this judge when they won dominant positions in all three branches of government. No one cares about a cloud in the end.

You obviously haven't heard Biden's statements on this exact scenario in 91.

I was paraphrasing him, and he fasho cared about a cloud of doubt.

I've realized that the users who are on conspiracy have no memory of political actions before 2001, and that's a really troubling issue.

You obviously haven't heard Biden's statements on this exact scenario in 91.

Why are they significant at this point?

I was paraphrasing him, and he fasho cared about a cloud of doubt.

What did that amount to?

I've realized that the users who are on conspiracy have no memory of political actions before 2001, and that's a really troubling issue.

That's nothing but a grandiose hyperbole.

If you literally don't know what they are or what they are about, perhaps look. Then you can easily see how this is significant to this exact scenario and case. Or you could just keep talking out of your ass, which is fine.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/the-fbi-does-not-reach-conclusions-in-sexual-misconduct-investigations-joe-biden-said-in-1991

It isn't hyperbole when you prove my point when you asked how an FBI investigation into a supreme Court nominee in 91 isn't significant to the exact same scenario happening in 2018.

It isn't hyperbole when you prove my point when you asked how an FBI investigation into a supreme Court nominee in 91 isn't significant to the exact same scenario happening in 2018.

I'm saying that something Joe Biden's dumb ass said almost 30 years ago doesn't amount to anything significant historically. Just because you remember it doesn't mean that it has any relevance to the topic at hand.

Like I said, which you've proved yet again.

Did you know what Biden was referencing? Answer that in the next comment to prove you're able to read and have comprehension. Typing it out may make you realize how similar to two events are.

However, something Ford said 36 years ago doesn't amount to anything significant...I can just say shit like that too. Just because I say it doesn't make it true though and you know that.

Don't be so petulant if you're unfamiliar with history, it's a learning experience for us all.

I've heard the press claim that there is a cloud over Clarence Thomas, but I haven't noticed it and if it does exist, it hasn't amounted to anything.

You sir, are ignorant and I honestly do not care for your opinions on the matter on what amounts to what. Thank you for your comment though.

A cloud of doubt is the phrase and Biden was right about it then. Just like the same applies here, regardless of your understanding or mental facilities.

Oh, because Biden said something about a completely abstract idea, it must be true! Ok bud, have fun with your cloud that nobody will notice and will have no effect on anything.

Oh wow? Still spouting nonsense?

Haha no need to get upset

Lol, don't assume I'm upset.

You're just a bit of a goon.

Ad hom means you lost the argument and shows that you’re upset about it, which you are proving once again with more ad hom

You've beaten me by calling me angry, yet I have no clue what your argument even is...but sure man you've won. I'll even give you an upvote.😂

How do you think “the truth” of an event over 30 years ago that the alleged victim’s own witnesses have denied knowledge of? The way I see this situation, it’s basically her word against his. Here’s the two options that I could see happen (with results of any possible investigation confirming either way being a near impossibility): a-he gets through and the accusers disappear into ancient memory with the occasional complaint from dems or b-he doesn’t get confirmed and the accusers disappear. Either way, I don’t expect anything to keep coming from accusers after the decision is made. In my view, regardless of either lying, and I say this because of the timing, this is a political move 100% to attempt to influence the mid terms. These accusations are absolutely not about finding justice for the alleged victims. As was said during the hearings, and I really don’t see many people bring this up, in Maryland there is no statute of limitations for felony sexual offenses. Why hasn’t this option been followed?

Where did he say he doesn't want an investigation? I like how everyone pretends they don't know exactly what is going on here.

He never said he didn't want an investigation. He, like Ford, left it to the committee.

I think he would have been pleased to have a thorough investigation the day Ford sent the letter to Feinstein and began this circus.

...in July.

He used "leaving it to the committee," a committee he knew wasn't going to call for an investigation, as a way of avoiding answering the question.

You would think that he would want to have his name cleared, but this entire confirmation process has been Republicans constantly and consistently ignoring precedence because they are (for some strange reason) desperate to get him on the bench as soon as possible.

Are you that daft? The real question is why the dems sat on this until the 11th hour. If they had something, they had since July to investigate. Why didn't they?

Because Ford didn't want her life put on center stage but when it became clear that the Republicans weren't going to do their job, she finally relented and gave Feinstein permission.

It was even confirmed Thursday that Ford reached out with the information before Kavanaugh even got the nomination.

So are you that daft? You can't see that the Republicans know Kavanaugh is dirty, that's why they are rushing, because the longer he is scrutinized the more obvious it becomes.

Let me ask you something, all politics aside. If you truly believed that is Kavanaugh was your assailant, wouldn't you have told the FBI before Dianne Feinstein if you weren't politically motivated?

Another thing that I don't see addressed very often, do you believe her testimony as an "experimental psychologist" that she never has had a conversation about how to beat a polygraph test?

Personally, if Kavanaugh had assailed me, it would have been known since high school. But that's the difference between now and the early 80's, men and women. Ford had spent decades of her life building her own career/reputation. If she could have avoided coming forward at all, she would have. But now, she will not be remembered for what she has done with her life, but for what happened to her when she was a teen.

Why do you think she would have? Do you think polygraphs were a large portion of her study? To be honest, I wasn't sure why the prosecutor went down that line of questioning anyway.

Personally, if Kavanaugh had assailed me, it would have been known since high school.

Welp, Kavanaugh was a nerdy, academic/sports kid that was true to his family traditions and didn't want to get laid until he was in love, so move on from your fever dream.

But that's the difference between now and the early 80's, men and women.

Yeah. I was a sophomore in highschool when this unsubstantiated party went down. In Ford's first letter she said "everyone knew about it" and she recanted. You know why? Because people didn't even talk about this. This was when rape victims got what they deserved because their skirts were too short. She lied that "everyone talked about it".

Ford had spent decades of her life building her own career/reputation.

Again, her own family and best friends from the DC community didn't show up to sit behind her. And her career belies her testimony on several key points. She's either the worst experimental psychologist or a supreme liar.

Do you think polygraphs were a large portion of her study?

I imagine that it was purging herself saying she's never had a conversation about how to beat a polygraph, don't you?

To be honest, I wasn't sure why the prosecutor went down that line of questioning anyway.

Because the prosecutor knows she's a liar?

Kavanaugh is/was a functional alcoholic. He presents a "choir boy" image for official records, because that's what he was raised to do, but off the record, he was a drunken jock. That was confirmed to be the case in college too.

This was when rape victims got what they deserved because their skirts were too short.

What the actual fuck is wrong with you?

And everyone knew about Kavanaugh's drinking and his antics when drunk. It has been confirmed numerous times by numerous people.

Where do you keep getting this "experimental psychologist" stuff from? She is a professor and a research psychologist. Go look up her actual background instead of regurgitating whatever BS t_d is spreading.

"Purging" herself? Are you trying to say perjuring herself? Because, no, that would involve her lying like Kavanaugh did.

The prosecutor was brought in to try and damage Ford's credibility. She failed to do that.

Kavanaugh is/was a functional alcoholic. He presents a "choir boy" image for official records, because that's what he was raised to do, but off the record, he was a drunken jock. That was confirmed to be the case in college too.

When do we start getting to diagnose people publicly without evidence? There is a standard that shows if someone is an alcoholic- has he lost jobs, family, dui, jail?? And "functional" is putting it lightly. Have you achieved anything close to what this person has? Do you really think alcohol is a big, negative factor in his life?

This was when rape victims got what they deserved because their skirts were too short.

<>What the actual fuck is wrong with you?

Do you have a problem with me telling you how it was then? I was there. Do you really need /s to follow along?

And everyone knew about Kavanaugh's drinking and his antics when drunk. It has been confirmed numerous times by numerous people.

Yeah. He hung out with the guys after school/sports. Antics? Tell me more.

Where do you keep getting this "experimental psychologist" stuff from? She is a professor and a research psychologist. Go look up her actual background instead of regurgitating whatever BS t_d is spreading.

In her own bio you will see her education. Don't be pedantic.

"Purging" herself? Are you trying to say perjuring herself? Because, no, that would involve her lying like Kavanaugh did.

Likely a funny text correct.

No, I have morals, so I never achieved anything close to what Kavanaugh has done. I also wasn't sent to an expensive prep school, then sent to Yale, and given connections to powerful people in conservative circles. I had to work to get to where I am.

To have that mindset shows that you are a very disturbed individual. Rape is never "getting what they deserve." It doesn't matter how short someone's skirt is, rape is always wrong.

More was told. The adventures of Bart O'Kavanaugh (which Kavanaugh avoided answering), his yearbook page, other stories from other people who knew him at the time. How many Yale classmates have come out in the last few days saying he lied?

Her bio says she is a research psychologist who specializes in statistical models to help ensure accurate conclusions to experiments. And why avoid being pedantic? Why not be correct in your statements?

And like I said, no she was no perjuring herself. Kavanaugh was.

No, I have morals, so I never achieved anything close to what Kavanaugh has done. I also wasn't sent to an expensive prep school, then sent to Yale, and given connections to powerful people in conservative circles. I had to work to get to where I am.

Now I get it. Jealously. Are you also saying there aren't powerful liberal circles?

To have that mindset shows that you are a very disturbed individual. Rape is never "getting what they deserve." It doesn't matter how short someone's skirt is, rape is always wrong.

I'm reporting this. I'm not disturbed. I was giving you an example of how you were exemplifying the climate in the 80's. The disturbing part is that you can't tell history from present.

More was told. The adventures of Bart O'Kavanaugh (which Kavanaugh avoided answering), his yearbook page, other stories from other people who knew him at the time. How many Yale classmates have come out in the last few days saying he lied?

Do you have something to back this?

Her bio says she is a research psychologist who specializes in statistical models to help ensure accurate conclusions to experiments. And why avoid being pedantic? Why not be correct in your statements?

Her bio says she studied experimental psychology.

And like I said, no she was no perjuring herself. Kavanaugh was.

How about that 2nd Safeway door that didn't exist?

Why would I be jealous? If that was the kind of life I wanted to lead then I would be doing so. Sorry, but this line of attack isn't going to work for you.

What are you even trying to say now? First you show your abominable character, now you are trying to say "that's just how things were" as if that makes what you said OK? Seriously, seek professional help.

No proof that you would accept, because it doesn't suit your world view.

That's funny, everything I can find about her says she worked with statistical models. Almost as if you are reading from a source that is trying to make her seem more extreme than she really is.

So the Safeway encounter with Judge has been established and investigators can begin working to determine an more precise time when the party would have occurred?

What subway encounter? The one with Mark where she met him going in a second door that didn't exist at the time?

alcoholic

lol how do you know all this stuff about Kavanaugh? accusing the other person of reading too much T_D but where the hell are YOU getting your info from? sounds like you have been reading huff post

It was even confirmed Thursday that Ford reached out with the information before Kavanaugh even got the nomination.

Whats the source on this, please?

The prosecutor was establishing a timeline of Ford's allegations. She had reached out to her rep on July 6th, Kavanaugh was nominated on July 9th.

How did you come to this conclusion? Why are you being coy about a source?

On July 6, 2018, I had a sense of urgency to relay the information to the Senate and the President as soon as possible before a nominee was selected. I called my congressional representative and let her receptionist know that someone on the President’s shortlist had attacked me. I also sent a message to The Washington Post’s confidential tip line. 

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/26/christine-blasey-ford-opening-statement-senate-845080

Happy? Should I find YouTube videos of the words being spoken for you too?

So you are saying that this was claimed by Ford or that this has been established concretely?

She said specifically this under oath. Something that investigators could easily confirm. I'd consider that unconfirmed but extremely likely.

You shouldn't present that as fact if it is still just a claim. That is dishonest and misleading. The appropriate way to convey this would be "Ford claimed..." or "Ford claimed under oath that..." instead of lying and then getting pissy with someone who asked you for a source.

Disprove it then. I have an on-the-record statement backing my stance. What do you have?

Your claim was dishonest and you have admitted as much. You claimed to know something to be fact, when all you know is that someone claimed it to be fact. Do you understand the difference?

What is dishonest in my claim? Where I said the prosecutor established the timeline? Because if you read the full transcripts, you'll see that my claim is indeed true.

Has any source tried to dispute when she went to her rep and the WaPo? Well, other than you right now because you know it isn't something a layperson can prove, so you think you might get to score one on "duh liberuls," right?

What is dishonest in my claim?

"It was even confirmed Thursday that Ford reached out with the information before Kavanaugh even got the nomination."

That wasn't confirmed, only claimed. Do you understand the difference or not?

The prosecutor asked her to confirm the timeline, on the record, in front of the whole world, and she did so. If she had been inaccurate, every Fox story, whether to had to do with Kavanaugh or not, would say so in the headline.

The prosecutor asked her to confirm the timeline, on the record, in front of the whole world, and she did so.

She confirmed what she was claiming. That doesn't confirm the claim. Do you understand the difference or not?

I absolutely know that Kavanaugh is full of shit. I also know that despite all the republican efforts and smears, there still hasn't been anything found to be untrue in Ford's testimony.

I absolutely know that Kavanaugh is full of shit.

The point is that you have no idea whether Ford's claim is true, and nothing confirms it other than her own claim. That's is why presenting it as fact is dishonest.

Ask the WaPo or her rep on when Ford contacted them. Until then, I will believe the believable one.

Until then, I will believe the believable one.

Then say that instead of trying to present your opinion as fact.

It is a fact that there is an established record of when Blasey Ford contacted her state Rep and the WaPo. That established fact has not been disputed, challenged, or defeated.

It is a fact that there is an established record of when Blasey Ford contacted her state Rep and the WaPo.

Why didn't you link to that instead of just linking to her claim and stating it as fact?

Her statement on the record, under penalty of perjury, is a fact.

And in your mind, everything said under oath is true?

I think he doesn't care one way or another because it is redundant and he knows that we need this seat filled. He also is on the side of the people that don't want appointments held up indefinitely to obstruct democracy because of hoaxes. He also doesn't fully trust that an FBI investigation would be fair sans the obvious political bias that has poisoned that agency.

Held up for a week for an investigation vs held up for a year for partisanship? Yeah, no room to talk regarding seats needing to be filled quickly.

Biden rule vs. accusing of serial gang rape.

Not comparable. Just stop.

"it's a drinking game where you take 3 shot glasses... Umm... Set them up in a, uh, triangle, and uh... you ever play quarters? No? Well it's like quarters."

Go rethink the point you thought you just made and come back. Thanks.

You mean where he was establishing in his yearbook how he participated in threesomes? How sober/willing were the girls?

The fuck??? Devils triangle was a drinking game in the 80's. Imagine a time when there was no internet, no Facebook, no smartphone, no weird viral "eat tide pods" weirdness. How fucking audacious that people here would try to say what party games and lingo meant in the eighties based off your disgusting Urban Dictionary. Your nasty, grinding sex culture truly doesn't apply to teens in the eighties. We drank beer.

Are you intentionally or ignorantly lying?

I'm recounting my childhood and upbringing and telling you how it was. Where have I said something that you disagree with?

You don't happen to work in the House of Representatives, do you? Were you the one to update the wiki page for devil's triangle to include Kavanaugh's made-up explanation?

I was being raped by you while walking my children home from school.

Let's have this investigated then. Please notify your local law enforcement agency or the FBI so that they can investigate. You have my full support.

Sure thing. But I am going to wait until your next job interview.

Statute of limitations. Better you do it right away. MeToo has empowered you my friend, you no longer have to be afraid.

MeToo is a protect designed to protect the pedophiles.

Are you having a stroke?

No, why?

Because you are spewing out incoherent garbage.

So, you don't understand a statement and you ask if they have had a stroke? Is that in earnest, or are you just being deplorable. Obviously you aren't concerned that I may have had a stroke, you just want to demean rather than discuss. I feel raped.

Its a job interview not a trial. Statute of limitations does not apply. He's just going to make a claim, not provide evidence, and you won't get the job.

Dude, your hopping into a mess you don't want to. This Q person is insane. Which is why I am encouraging him to seek law enforcement for his claim that I raped him.

Y'know, like how an innocent person would welcome an investigation to clear their name.

He doesn't need law enforcement. All he needs is to accuse you of something, not provide evidence, and you won't get the job.

The "if you have nothing to hide..." argument has never worked. No idea why you're trying to use it here.

An innocent person does not welcome unneeded investigations.

An innocent person does not resist investigation. And no, the "he just needs to accuse you and you won't get a job" strawman doesn't hold up. Nor would it ever. But by all means, keep spreading the sexist nonsense.

Yes they do, and especially so when the investigation is based on non-credible accusations.

Its not a strawman if that's exactly whats happening. He's being labeled a rapist based on non-credible accusations.

Except the allegations are credible. It is still a strawman because you are claiming this happens all the time, when the truth is, the sexual assault detailed in the allegations is what happens all the time. 1 in 6 women, vs 2 in at least 114 SC nominees.

I don't think you know what "credible" means. Accusations lacking evidence cannot be credible.

Its not a strawman when its exactly what's happening to Kavanaugh.

Nice try though.

Ford's own parents that live within a bus trip to the WH didn't show up to fortify her claims. Can you imagine not showing up to your child's take down of the SC nominee? Where was her husband? Her children? Her friends? Just a bunch of ultraviolet lackeys behind her.

She had the truth on her side.

You can't be for real.

The truth that that every witness said didn't happen??? Her truth??? The imaginary one with no substance and no witnesses???

When did Kavanaugh resist an investigation?

So why is it Kavanaugh doesn't want an investigation?

Kavanaugh said he welcomes any action by the committee that resolves the matter and clears him, and if that they want a 7th FBI investigation into his past, then he'd be fine with that.

He said this under oath. I don't know why you and the media keep printing the opposite. You can literally go on c-span right now and see it on video.

He said he would leave it to the committee. That way, if no investigation is done he can just go "Aw shucks. Well, you heard them." and avoid any responsibility.

He could have and should have urged the committee to bring in the FBI to investigate, but instead he kept dodging the topic.

He wanted to meet the committee within 24 hours of finding out but the minority members of the committee delayed it for 10 days. They don't care about any alleged 4 decade old rape. They care about delaying until the chance for them to gain senate majority power. That is it.

He wanted to have the "he said/she said" dispute, not an actual investigation. He didn't want it looked into, he just wanted you to take his word that it never happened.

In the US we are lucky enough to have a presumption of innocence unless proven guilty. He is innocent. If a real crime took place she should file a police report and have rape charges brought upon him. Then the whatever agency that wants can investigate it and he can have a public trial with a jury.

But that won't happen because there is no evidence. All her witnesses came out on record as saying the event never happened.

He committed crimes before our very eyes. When the allegations came out, they should have been investigated. The ongoing cover-up and his blatant lies are what have convinced me he isn't innocent.

Kavanaugh committed crimes before our very eyes??? Help us out dealing with your obviously psychotic TDS episode.

When and where did your imagination touch you?

He lied under oath. Are you saying that is not a crime?

He lied about what???

Off the top of my head, the meanings of the yearbook entries, the extent of his alcoholism, his conduct as a teen. I'm willing to bet the bit about his daughter saying "pray for the lady" is also a lie meant to make him seem more sympathetic. Unfortunately, the "sym" didn't make it.

You are willing to bet that his daughter didn't pray for the accuser? Do you even know Jesus? Of all the things.

In my family, we always pray for peace, truth and guidance and ask Jesus to forgive all of us, even our false accusers.

Good for you. But I assume you also keep those prayers private because they are between you and your god. You wouldn't try to use your faith for public gain, would you?

What crime did he commit? There is no cover up. He was the one that asked it to come publicly before the senate committee. No one else. He did. Your hyper partisan opinions are clouding your judgement. If I claimed Hillary raped a child, should she be presumed guilty and hung out to dry from the first accusation?

Lying under oath.

He's innocent until proven guilty so he hasn't committed perjury.

you must be referring to ford, as she's dropped her lying case. lmfao. owned.

Can you provide a source for Kavanaugh asking for a neutral party to investigate the claims?

Feinstein held the claim because Ford requested anonymity. That shows care for the well-being of her constituent more than it shows some underhanded partisan ploy.

What investigation was performed? By committee staff members? The request had been from the beginning to have the FBI investigate so it is done apolitically.

Some random person is already trying to accuse me of a crime on Reddit because they think that is an actual strategy. I could certainly prove my innocence. So yeah, that line of reasoning doesn't hold.

You believe Thomas too? I've got a bridge to sell ya buddy.

And Trump? Now I'm beginning to think you're just trolling. Surely you can't be this dumb.

The scope of those investigations did not include his conduct at parties when a teenager. And his conduct at parties as a teenager isn't even the real problem here, it is him lying about it. So no, your fifth option doesn't work out. But it was a good effort.

1) The women are lying and there is an investigation: They are found to be lying, they are arrested, and Kavanaugh gets his name cleared and a seat on the SC.

No, the FBI cant "find her to be lying." Its impossible to prove, and the FBI doesn't make conclusions anyway.

Imagine if a woman came forward and said John Podesta tried to rape her when she was 15.

She would be found dead.

Imagine though

She would be found dead.

Does John Podesta even like girls?

From what I understand only children.

the implication being that you understand very little

We’ve got his e-mails Podesta

And yet you still don't understand

I understand quite well. Podesta is a child molesta.

Just proving my argument for me

That’s the funniest part of everything going on. Everything right leaning people have been screaming about is now happening, and were watching them do a complete 180.

they don't live long enough.

And it hasn't been 30 years yet. The people you are talking apparently think the victims are only reality when they are grown and successful and have political motivation. To hell with the children when real abuse is happening. They can't bother to get to a phone and call the FBI??? Seriously, they defend a 50 yo woman as a victim of recovered memories yet discount real-time victims that are actual children.

Wow, a theoretical whataboutism. That's some advanced stuff right there.

The problem is, nobody believes you but millions believe Ford. Huh.

There you go! Pussy whipped soy-boy.

Same shit is everywhere. When any woman comes with metoo BS, it is highly accepted, and first off that guy becomes villain. But when man accuses woman (Looking at Argenta case), nobody 'believes'. Abomination!

Haha, why are you mad at me bud? Blame the collective unconscious. Or keep beating your head against a wall!

The democrats will be in control again, and so will the republicans. There's nothing new under the sun, buddy, and everyone's an asshole. Get used to it or die a bitter man.

Contact the police, your local news outlet, and your senator. Be willing to take a lie detector and tell your story on the nightly news. Then setup that go fund me and profit. What is stopping you?

Maybe I missed the context. My bad.

As for the delay, maybe you wouldn’t wait. But I do think even the most traumatized person would speak up if their assailant was about to take a major position even 30 years later.

That guy assassinated his own character, what a mess! I’m not from the US so don’t care either way about Republicans or Democrats and for what it’s worth it looks definitely like the Democrats are using the woman in a way to get as much political leverage rather than in a way that’s best for her, but come on. The man is a joke. I couldn’t believe someone like that, who talks like that and lies so blatantly under oath (we all know what those various terms mean) could even be considered for such a role. The US is fucked. The lunatics are running the asylum. It’s happening where I am too. That’s the real conspiracy. Extremist ‘sovereign individual’ neofeudal elites are currently taking over with the aim of solidifying the power of corporations and the very wealthiest. And they managed to convince a bunch of conspiracy theorists to support them! It’d be a marvel if it wasn’t so fucking depressing. No one is paying attention to what’s really going on and what they’re really up to behind all this stupid theatre and petty divide and conquer bullshit.

You don't respect a man that would pour his heart out and shed tears for what he believes in?

What country are you from? Here, we think it is cool for boys to wear dresses and play with dolls and express their emotions.

(((They))) hate him and want to destroy him because he is a successful White man with strong morals, character and values.

"I'M NOT A RAPIST" - BK

Posted from the office of Diane Feinstein.

Wrong.

Are you? Because you seem to be 100% sure that he did and is lying about it.

Ok, how do you know that? How can you speak so authoritatively on a matter? You a drink expert?

Just because God rolled a constitution score of 8 for you doesn't mean it's the same for everyone else.

You can't just throw around baseless rape accusations for every little thing people do that makes you uncomfortable...oh wait

Didn't stop talking from spreading it though.

He never said he didn't want an investigation. He, like Ford, left it to the committee.

I think he would have been pleased to have a thorough investigation the day Ford sent the letter to Feinstein and began this circus.

I don't "love" the guy but I agree with OP that you people think it is ok to make fun of a man crying for himself, family and country. I thought men were allowed to cry now.

He used "leaving it to the committee," a committee he knew wasn't going to call for an investigation, as a way of avoiding answering the question.

You would think that he would want to have his name cleared, but this entire confirmation process has been Republicans constantly and consistently ignoring precedence because they are (for some strange reason) desperate to get him on the bench as soon as possible.

I'm saying I wouldn't be surprised if he did. And I wasn't intending to imply anything. I'm just saying it's possible. We don't even know he only drank beer. What I want to say is none of us know what BK drank, or even how much he consumed.

we get it your crazy

Why are you unable to understand that not everyone who drinks beer gets blackout drunk and sexually assaults girls? Seems like projecting more than anything else. No evidence has been provided showing guilt of sexual assault, and all of Ford's witnesses have contradicted her story.

What I'm hearing from you is that you need no evidence to believe an allegation as long as you disagree with the defendant's politics. I fear for the future of this country.

What case? I’m talking about multiple issues. He refused to comment under oath on whether or not water boarding is torture. On the DC court of appeals he supported indefinite detention of American citizens with little to no evidence. He signed onto a judgment that blocked wrongfully detained prisoners who were tortured from being able to sue the private contractors that tortured them. Unfortunately these proceedings haven’t been transparent enough to know just how involved he was in Bush’s overriding of previously in place torture laws but what we do know is he holds the neocon position on illegal detention and torture everywhere he’s on record.

I doubt that statement. Your hypocrisy rings true tho.

I've never blacked out, and have drank quite heavily. Your absolutist statement is silly and incorrect.

MeToo is a protect designed to protect the pedophiles.

Its a job interview not a trial. Statute of limitations does not apply. He's just going to make a claim, not provide evidence, and you won't get the job.

I absolutely know that Kavanaugh is full of shit.

The point is that you have no idea whether Ford's claim is true, and nothing confirms it other than her own claim. That's is why presenting it as fact is dishonest.

You sir, are ignorant and I honestly do not care for your opinions on the matter on what amounts to what. Thank you for your comment though.

A cloud of doubt is the phrase and Biden was right about it then. Just like the same applies here, regardless of your understanding or mental facilities.