The complementary nature of the TWO genders.

1  2018-10-06 by RMFN

The structure of a family farm exists as the only successful form of Communism in history. The only entity in which the workers truly own the means of production is the family farm. Communal living, a division of labor based on skill, and extremely hard work are emblematic of farming. But, unlike most urban forms of production the produce of the workers labor is truly their own. You reap what you sew. Plant no seed and you will have no produce. A labor theory of value can be applied here, the farmer owns the land, his means of production, because he joins his labor with the land. The ritualistic conjoining of labor and soil that produces an economic good is an alchemy far more rewarding than the degenerate alchemy we see on Wall Street.

My girlfriend's family has farmed the same tract of land for five generations. Once you know what your looking for icons of the past gleam in the thick thick grass. Old and unused garden beds. The old cattle scale, still in use but in decay. They have joined sweat and soil for a living for all of this time with nothing but the land and decaing out buildings to show for it. Why do they continue in vein when massive corporations are pushing farms like theirs into extinction? Why toil into obvious oblivion? It is their nature to persist in times of torment. Who does the independent farmer exploit? He is a "capitalist" if you mean he works to make money. But in truth the farmer works to make it to next year. Farmers are next year people. The rain will be better next year. Next year we will expand the north field. Next year we will repair the aging barn. Next year. Next year. Next year.. Ad infenitum.

Degeneration of our family farms across the country has coincided with the degeneracy of our mass consumer culture fueled by unregulated capitalism and usury. Skilled labor is more valuable than unskilled labor. That is why engineers are paid more than bank tellers. Industry and the streamlined division of labor has created an entire economy of unskilled labor. Finance and advertising are our number one and two most profitable industries in modern times. Speculation on digital speculation ad nausium. Physical alchemy achieved. Lead to gold in the futures market. At one time, when our population was more rural we had a massive population of skilled labor. Skilled in animal husbandry, in crop rotation, and sustainable living. My girlfriend's mother told us a humorous story that is emblematic of this modern era of convenience that has freed us from the skills our ancestors took for granted. As a young girl, 14-15 she was talking to an old woman who would have been young in the 1890's. She was declaring how odd it was that so few young brides could render lard anymore. Think about that. Lard was a raw material used for numerous things on a family farm. Used for everything from lubricant, to making soap, and of course cooking it was something a homestead could not function without. Today farmers markets that have popped up across the country can fetch high dollar for homemade saops that do not use the chemicals of the massive corporations. Many people are finding it trendy to do things the old way.

The family farm exemplifies the complimentary nature of the genders. While the men worked the field women would be busy with many tasks, preserving fruits and vegetables, rendering lard, making clothes, and teaching children to read and write, typically from the Bible, this among umpteen tasks that our culture has left to the monopolies and to the state. The division of labor provided by the complimentary nature of the genders allows a family farm to function. The fields become the domain of the man and the house the domain of the woman. This is not sexist to say it is just an observation of the divided labor that took place naturally in history. We must rekindle the altars. We must relearn the old ways.

Sharpening a knife is the most glaring skill that our modern "men" have lost. Take out your pocket knife, if you have one, is it sharp? Sharp enough to shave hair? If it isn't, you aren't a the man your grandfather was. Mass production has created a culture where once something wears out it is common practice to just throw it away and get another. Take a second and think about your grandpa's pocket knife. An essential tool every man carried. Think about the discolored metal and the age warn edge. Think about the totemic item left by his decades of work. A item worthy a shrine. Where did it end up? Where is your grandpa's pocket knife? Our ancestors tools are worthy. They still ply the land as efficiently as they once did, if maintained of course. So much has fallen into disrepair in this the era of rust and dust. Speculating on if it is going to be a good year for rain is healthy, speculating on digital transactions and the labor of others is a sinister form of usury only possible in an unhealthy urban environment. We must decentralize everything. We must work for ourselves. This is the message I bring to you, ply the land, become the telos of the revolution, own the means of production.

As an aside, and partially the revelation of a ritual, I told my girlfriend that we can get married the day she brings me one pint of rendered lard.

58 comments

Two genders. Two scoops. Two justices. Two terms.

Are you the kind of human who would follow Trump into a battle that he will then abandon and pull his own support from?

I think Kamala Harris will be the next President, how will you like that?

Lol I would gladly follow the god emperor to the ends of the earth.

All your girl had to do to get that lard is buy two pounds of bacon and cook it slow in the self cleaning electric oven.

Are you telling a woman what to do??

People were removed from the farms as a means of control of the food supply. That was done very efficiently by creating that 80s farm price boom bust.

Yep. Can't let the soyim feed themselves real food. We have to replace healthy produce with soy.

And it was done by the political group that bitches and moans about the destruction of the family. An idea tht didn't really exist, ever.

Lol? Lemme guess you just read some Marx? Edgy.

Women used to die so frequently that a man might have 3 or more wives over his life, women and children were chattel who belonged to men.

Yep, women absolutely were never coddled or held to high esteem. I guess Queen Elizabeth never existed either.

I think you're thinking if Africa or Asia where women are property. That ended in Europe hundreds of years ago.

What does that mean, that you think all women are Queens?

How have women been, "coddled?"

Is refusing women the right to vote, the right to work and earn a living, coddling?

You honestly don't think women didn't work before feminism... Do you?

They were slaves to the men. No pay, no security and could be abused at will and abandoned at any time.

In what civilization? The ottomans?

Nordic women were definitely not slaves. Woman have had the right to own land in Iceland for over a millennia. It was much more widespread before the disease Christianity invaded Europe.

You're basing this off of what?

History, ancient and modern, in particular all religions first grab control of sexuality and abuse women. You can't name a single major religion that doesn't demand that women be less than men.

Ummm. Yes I can. All ancient European pagan traditions held women in very high esteem. You're just imposing you're Christianized view of the world onto the past.

How can not having any political and economic rights be considers to be held in, "high esteem?"

And you are mistaken, wealthy women were only protected to produce heirs. That didn't work out so well when they took up the practice of marrying cousins and brothers to "preserve some imaginary bloodline of stupidity."

Is burning women at the stake for witchery an expression of esteem?

How can not having any political and economic rights be considers to be held in, "high esteem?"

They had those rights. Women have had the right to own land in Iceland for millennia.

And you are mistaken, wealthy women were only protected to produce heirs. That didn't work out so well when they took up the practice of marrying cousins and brothers to "preserve some imaginary bloodline of stupidity."

No. All women had the same rights as men in Nordic society. And that whole "bloodline" line makes no sense. You're still thinking of Christian civilization.

Is burning women at the stake for witchery an expression of esteem?

You're thinking of Judeao Christians. Please. Pagans were the witches.

Oh sure and Iceland was such an influential place. Same thing happened to, settle, the American West. Allow women some economic rights as the only way to get them to move there and stay.

Oh sure and Iceland was such an influential place. Same thing happened to, settle, the American West. Allow women some economic rights as the only way to get them to move there and stay.

So it's insignificant? You're allowed to generalize but I give specifics and they don't matter to you?

Show me how anything that happened in Iceland had any effect on Denmark itself?

How is that relevant? Are you trolling??

No I think you would be the one doing that, naming Iceland as an example of historical treatment of women.

You gave zero examples yet you bitch about mine? Lol kindly go straw man yourself.

There is no where in any available historical accounts of ancient Europe or Rome or China or India where women had any political or economic status though over the centuries a few women managed to write, engage in business, and ever more rare gain political power. They were exceptions, not the rule.

​

And I did name specifics, religions for one, YOu can't name even one of the world's religions that do not put women below men.

​

Nor can you name any governments that were controlled by women.

You might be able to name a few who allowed wealthy women some rights to their dowries but not much else.

I named a religoin.

Never heard of the pagan island of lesbos?

I don't think you know anything about it. It was small and controlled first by the Persians then by the Greek City Delhi.

But sure where is the archaeology that supports what ever it is you want me to know you believe about it?

Political propaganda is not history.

Lol. Ohh. So the examples you gave aren't propaganda?

You haven't even mentioned what you want to claim about Lesbos?

Why did you mention it?

It was a society ruled by woman.

Show me a credible source for that claim.

A pioneer woman in 1830' kansas had more equality than a woman today. All people in the Soviet Union were equal.

You see how "equality" is meaningless.

Can you even explain equality? You seem to be ignoring the abortion issue.

There was no Kansas territory in 1830 and probably not many white people except those who passed through on the way to Santa Fe.

You are the one who keeps using the word, equality, free of context, true, there is o meaning.

I have been very specific, political and economic equality.

You refuse to name what rights women must surrender to end what you seem to be opposed to, equality, equality of what?

What do you mean by political and economic equality?

That has been achieved.

How can you look at the governing bodies and corporate executives and make that claim?

.... I'm looking at masters degrees.

You're holding up a few exceptions. The vast majority of homeless people are men. That not equal..

Teachers who don't get paid much in the red states and only a little more in the blue states.

What Nordic society are you talking about? \

I don't know of any who allowed women an equal say in governance or trading and other economic activity.

What Nordic society are you talking about?

All pre Christian northern European civilizations.

I don't know of any who allowed women an equal say in governance or trading and other economic activity.

Look into how Norway functioned before paganism fell to Christianity. You'll be surprised. Woman were not only equal but very often part of elder councils.

Are you claiming only Christians burned women?

Jews and Muslims did too.

Lol I noticed you deleted your problematic comment.

I put it in a new comment.

Pretty interesting that you think you can tell woman what to do...

You really have a knack for non-sequiters don’t you?

Hai it's the Bernie bro!

I voted for Harambe you goober

Zoo animal lives matter.

Finally you say something that makes sense

Are men and women equal?

The goal is economic and political equality.

I don't know what you want to say. Why don't you list where women should not have equality?

Because I don't get the opposition to equal value?

Though men have been abandoning their wives and children only since forever and everyone seems to want to return to that at the same time they want to remove the right of girls and women to have an education and work and political voices.

And now we have more women graduating with high level degrees than men. Looks like equity, plus some, has been achieved.

Well is abortion a woman's choice or both a man and a woman's choice?

Equality would say both have a equal choice to abort. But I'd like you to clarify your position. Are men and women equal?

"Are men and women equal" That is a deliberate shit move to frame the question to one point, which is no point unless you want men to have breasts and pussies and women to have dicks.

​

What do dicks and uteruses with a pussy have to do with political and economic equality?

​

Should the dick disqualify men, does the uterus disqualify women?

"Are men and women equal" That is a deliberate shit move to frame the question to one point, which is no point unless you want men to have breasts and pussies and women to have dicks.

​

What do dicks and uteruses with a pussy have to do with political and economic equality?

​

Should the dick disqualify men, does the uterus disqualify women?

And here's where you go off the deep end.

This is a repost. Pretty sure I saw it before on r/collapse.

Even if it is, I appreciate it and don't check r/collapse much anymore, so I'm glad I caught it on here, the message really needs to be spread!!!

It's from r/c_s_t.

Marxists at tmor don't like my post. But they love Islam... Strange..m I wonder why?

https://np.reddit.com/r/TopMindsOfReddit/comments/9lxrew/altright_top_mindpathetic_trollpossible_mod_alt

This is the message I bring to you, ply the land, become the telos of the revolution, own the means of production.

Your whole post is this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2omDlZlO_s

Oh sure and Iceland was such an influential place. Same thing happened to, settle, the American West. Allow women some economic rights as the only way to get them to move there and stay.

What Nordic society are you talking about? \

I don't know of any who allowed women an equal say in governance or trading and other economic activity.

No I think you would be the one doing that, naming Iceland as an example of historical treatment of women.

Show me a credible source for that claim.