Who is paying for anti-Iran policies in Washington
1 2018-10-13 by fdeckert
Who is paying John Bolton and Rudi Giuliani to front for an actual Iranian terrorist group responsible for killing Americans that was allowed to buy its way off the US terrorist group list with cold hard cash too during the Obama adminstration? Where are these huge sums coming from? Do you know?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/sep/21/iran-mek-group-removed-us-terrorism-list
https://lobelog.com/three-billionaires-paved-way-for-trumps-iran-deal-withdrawal/
29 comments
1 fdeckert 2018-10-13
This isn't really even a conspiracy since it is so blatant just ignored
1 M_Trubisky10 2018-10-13
Neocon Jews are, like usual.
1 fdeckert 2018-10-13
Lots of Jews opposed them too
1 M_Trubisky10 2018-10-13
Because they viewed neocon politics as ineffective. But Jewish supremacy is the shared goal
1 fdeckert 2018-10-13
Supremacy is the goal of lots of idiots
1 murphy212 2018-10-13
Neoconservatism is Trotskysm
Is everything clicking already?
1 timstolt1 2018-10-13
Relevant PDF, mostly pics...
1 timstolt1 2018-10-13
evidence, mostly pics...
1 tinylilzikababyhead 2018-10-13
Is there a lower life form than Giuliani? Maybe Dershowitz and Cheney?
1 tinylilzikababyhead 2018-10-13
It's antisemitic to point out the antagonists the world over.
1 GodsMistake 2018-10-13
Fuck no it's not. Antisemitic is a catch word created by the Zionists. Look up the definition of a semite and then just TRY to defend the Zionist Israelis as anything less than the most antisemitic people in the world.
1 tinylilzikababyhead 2018-10-13
(I was being sarcastic)
1 Pianu_Keys 2018-10-13
Put a /s after your comment next time and people will get it. Sarcasm doesn't translate well via text.
1 tinylilzikababyhead 2018-10-13
no
1 RWaggs81 2018-10-13
You really couldn't see the sarcasm in the way they worded that?
1 Dissenter9 2018-10-13
No, but there is the really dumb way to do it. Basically by giving rope to the Zionist by blaming it on the "Jews", which is then used to hang us all with. I never understood why people like walking right into their punch? Play it smart people...
1 jay_howard 2018-10-13
It's the same set of interests that were behind 9/11 as well: zionists, mossad, the Likud party and the various machinery they've spawned over the last few decades.
Always, the ZOG wants the US to fight its wars in the Middle East.
Robert Baer, the former CIA field officer and author, once said that Iranians are the natural allies to the Americans. They're smart, reasonable, the largest country in the region, never been occupied by a foreign power, and conflict with them would be catastrophic to the world economy.
It makes sense that we should be allied with the Iranians. Powerful forces want the US and Iran to remain at odds with each other.
1 fdeckert 2018-10-13
They certainly exploited it
Remember the first WTC bombing, the FBI had an informan tnamed Emad Salem among the bombmakers who offered to replace the bomb with a harmless substance but was told otherwise https://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/28/nyregion/tapes-depict-proposal-to-thwart-bomb-used-in-trade-center-blast.html?pagewanted=all
1 jay_howard 2018-10-13
I did not know that. Thank you
1 fdeckert 2018-10-13
The FBI supplied the detonator
1 perfect_pickles 2018-10-13
the FBI supplied the bomb expert to the gang too, they had no knolwedge of explosives before the FBi enabled them.
go listen to the FOIA telephone recordings, the FBI's expert threatened to 'lose' the bomb if he didn't get more pay, they FBI were stingy, he lost the bomb and the WTC went boom.
1 Dissenter9 2018-10-13
Maybe not occupied, but the CIA did install the Shah, and later the Ayatollah
1 jay_howard 2018-10-13
Both moves good for a handful of businessmen and devastating to an entire society as well as our political relationship. Short-sighted decision making has brought us all the way here.
You know the thing people point to when asked why they don't like Iranians? The hostage crisis. Where no one even died. Held by students--before we really had minted the word "terrorist". That event still colors our politics. As does our ousting of Mosaddegh for the Shah.
1 Dissenter9 2018-10-13
And lets not forget that the hostage crisis was extended thanks to Reagan, to use as leverage against Carter. I think the main problem with Iran, is not Iran, but the CIA's history of installing puppets that end up going their own way.
1 jay_howard 2018-10-13
Couldn't agree more.
1 6a6f6b6572 2018-10-13
I also think there is some oil game is going around with Iran, Venezuela and, may be, Russia to some extent.
My theory is that this will be last big cycle for the oil, as peak oil demand is expected to hit in the next decade. And countries would be better off offloading as much as oil possible in the high of the cycle.
Also, Saudi's want to offload some oil exposure via Armaco ipo as oil prices were down but now given the cycle is picking they have postponed it to 21.
I think all the current geopolitical issues Venezuela, Qatar, Iran, to some extent Russia are all related to oil.
Oil is still ruling the geopolitics close to century.
1 Dalai_Loafer 2018-10-13
They're wasting their money. Iran has friends too powerful for the yanks to take on militarily.
1 too-can 2018-10-13
zionists, apac
1 perfect_pickles 2018-10-13
the 51st state
1 jay_howard 2018-10-13
I did not know that. Thank you