This Picture is worth 34k+ Karma, but only here will you get… (nuclear bomb hoax)

1  2018-10-15 by Estamio2

Popular pic alone:

https://i.redd.it/jtlag91dt5g11.jpg

This Picture is worth 34k+ Karma, but only here will you get that this is actually a miniature underwater explosion:

https://imgur.com/Y7t62Q1

Feature picture as a movie:

https://imgur.com/JD5HeMZ

1958 Hollywood:

https://imgur.com/RRmKsDZ

For those new to the “Nuclear Bombs do not exist” conspiracy, brief intro:

Nuclear power exists, creating the cloud of steam seen above cooling towers.

Nuclear-powered pacemakers, exist, etc.

Uranium is one of many very heavy metals used in weapons as penetrating radioactive shrapnel. Radioactive particles have been disseminated by atmospheric explosions; analogous to infusing traceable substances into your bloodstream. And excessive radiation is dangerous.

What is shocking is the lack of evidence for explosive nuclear weapons. The whole thing stinks as a grand- propaganda ploy. And what a grrreat ploy is has been!

• Piles of explosives take time (and an ocean liner) to deliver, but if everybody thinks total devastation can come in the form of a few rapidly dropped missiles…? • USA gets an invasive government to protect citizens from this exotic threat from the sky and thereby… • Extort protection money! Billions and billions of dollars needed to "fight" a Cold War. How is a Cold War fought? By investing in a “mutually assured destruction”, of course. • They get an excuse to meddle in sovereign nation's affairs while unnerving people worldwide.

Before I hit you with the dirt, common retort to this absurd idea is “Hiroshima-Nagasaki”. (other comebacks include “the secret is too big” and “why would countries claim to have one? (or why don’t they challenge the pretense by defying the claim…)

Quickly: August 6 Hiroshima 'happened'. August 9th, the Soviets declared war on Japan.

So, agree to USA's boast that they have an Atomic Bomb, or get invaded by the Soviet Union? Other things were "mutually" agreed upon; Japan was to be occupied, after all. A defeated nation acquiescing to the victor's version of events, not surprising at all. History is written by the Victors.

"200,000 people reduced to shadows" sure sounds like propaganda, doesn't it?

"Hiroshima looked exactly like all the other burned-out cities in Japan."
- Major de Seversky. Sounds a lot more reasonable, doesn’t it?

(The official explanation for the lack of a blast crater/bald spot in Hiroshima is the supposed height of the detonation. So, the effects of the nuclear bomb are “spread out”, setting the city on fire. Might as well have been a fire-bombing.)

The Dirt

(“actual nuclear explosions” that turn out to be MGM special effects) Another of Arnold Gillespie’s classics, sold as real:

https://imgur.com/gallery/yXkGST1

Soldier’s watch Arnold’s miniature explosion:

https://np.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/775l7l/soldiers_watch_in_awe_as_a_21_kiloton_nuclear/

Actual Nuclear Cannon (Arnold Gillespie of MGM):

https://imgur.com/fB3ApTX

Actual “Grable” explosion (Arnold Gillespie of MGM):

https://imgur.com/k5uBbFf

The Hollywood Special Effects they are based on

https://imgur.com/ra8kEV8

Sources below.

Beyond the forbidden-and-exotic physics ("Top Secret"), all we get is a film-record containing many fakes. If you have real footage of nuclear bombs, you do not have to fake it.

34k Karma “Other Discussions”:

https://np.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/duplicates/97e5tz/nuclear_explosion_photographed_less_than_one/

https://np.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/5znx26/newly_declassified_highspeed_footage_shows_the/

Photo series: https://imgur.com/a/qt8S4#9wR1MlI

The Slo-mo Guys show you how the famous money-shot was made:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5rGFZWQfzk

S.S. To be clear, all of the images and videos I link herein are Fake Hollywood miniature special effects. The featured photograph and accompanying videos are all miniature explosions.

As you watch the proof I have provided, realize that total infrastructure-destruction can be delivered in the form of bombing campaigns, bioweapons, etc. The ferocity of war is not diminished by the revelation that there is no nuclear doomsday weapon. Just the popular image of nuclear annihilation is not correct.

The conspiracy is the false claim that such explosive destruction can be delivered in a small, rapidly deployed container. Perhaps you have already figured-out that the awesome claims for nuclear weapons is probably exaggerated. And if the declassified footage is fake…

39 comments

Nuclear-powered pacemakers

lol what?

Ah, betavoltaic. Nice. Don't think they make those anymore. Something about walking around with plutonium in your chest cavity.

U can smash any atoms into each other to produce crazy energy ... I guess the LHC is fake as well ?

The LHC infuses the protons with energy. The giant magnets are what is producing the energy. The "traces" and other identified "particle" are the outcome.

Thanks for commenting.

Ye? They COLLIDE producing massive amounts of energy .... your the one who can’t get his head around atoms splitting and the stored energy being released....

I think the fact no nukes have accidentally gone off shows they probably dont exist: the people in charge of such things are vastly incompetent.

Nukes aren't like dynamite, they can't just accidentally go off. You could drop a nuke into an active volcano and it wouldn't detonate. It's a very controlled reaction.

Of course not, but the systems in control of them are manned by humans.

"200,000 people reduced to shadows" sure sounds like propaganda, doesn't it?

No, that sounds like a strawman. Who ever made such a claim?

You might be right on that.

So, where did you hear that?

Somewhere like HA&L:

On August 6 and 9, 1945, atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. The blasts destroyed the cities and killed over 200,000 citizens. People were instantly vaporized.

I consulted very few "N-bombs are hoax" site and many more conventional sites, so the sentence is likely an overstatement than strawman, nonetheless good catch.

The comparisons of archival-to-movie special effects is original content by me.

This was quite an interesting read

I think the very idea of how a nuclear bomb works has change greatly over the years.

Just look at wikipedia. They now claim it is as simple as shooting a hollow uranium projectile into a solid uranium cylinder. LOL Why was North Korea having so much trouble building something so simple? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Boy#Design

I think the reality of what we called nuclear bombs in the past were just powerful hydrogen bombs.

Hydrogen bombs are nuclear weapons.

Technically yes, but a hydrogen bomb doesn't require nuclear material (uranium/plutonium).

Technically yes, but a hydrogen bomb doesn't require nuclear material (uranium/plutonium).

This is false. A hydrogen bomb uses both Plutonium and Uranium-235 to induce a fusion nuclear reaction as apposed to a fission reaction of a traditional atomic bomb.

If you google hydrogen bomb you will get NYT, CNN, livescience, and Times articles.

Do you really think they give the correct design and operation in the articles?

Hydrogen is pretty easy to understand. It's also pretty easy to explode.

What you are thinking of are air fuel bombs. The term hydrogen bomb is used to describe a nuclear fission weapon that uses a hydrogen isotope booster.

Besides that, hydrogen is extremely inefficient in air fuel bombs (it's gas in it's natural state, it has a large bond energy, and has only one covalent bond.

I would suggest dropping Hydrogen from our future replies on the topic. Use either air fuel bomb or thermobaric weapon.

A conventional atomic bomb, like used on Hiroshima, is the detonator for a hydrogen bomb - which is a fusion reaction, which is orders of magnitude more powerful than the atomic bomb - which is a fission reaction.

Here’s one for u lads ... before 1945 steel was at its best ... now it’s been contaminated by nuclear radiation ....... from ???

Radiation does, clearly exist. Porple's basements can have an unhealthy level of radiation. I am sure the atmospheric nuclear tests were radioactive particles blown far-and-wide (successfully disrupting radio communications)...and contributing to the current status of steel and ceramics.

Thanks for commenting.

atmospheric nuclear tests

What would those have been if nuclear explosions aren't real?

Just like today when you hear about "depleted uranium" bombs. MOAB with heavy-metal particles involved.

Convetional missiles pack an amazing punch for their size:

Ballistic Missile Wiki

There are no "depleted uranium bombs". Super dense metals are used in kinetic weapons. Something that explodes has to be as light as possible while having the highest possible number of gas molecules while in solid state.

Thanks.

Lol front page normie post about how radiation is apparently in every square millimeter of the Earth's surface and objects and your wallet from nuclear bomb tests

Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-background_steel


HelperBot v1.1 /r/HelperBot_ I am a bot. Please message /u/swim1929 with any feedback and/or hate. Counter: 219981

So your position: big booms aren't real cuz little booms look the same?

Many large things in nature have exact miniature counterparts. Take this microscopic wasp.

http://www.myrmecos.net/2011/08/26/a-parasitic-wasp-in-elegant-electrograph/

Does it's existence make big wasps not real? I'm not trying to be difficult. As someone who's only seen pics & vids of underwater bombs, nuclear bombs & micro-wasps, I can't tell you if any are real.

I've seen mt. rushmore, & postcards & miniature. Can confirm: real. Despite the souvenirs.

Good point. I first was enlightened that fake MGM footage has been officially stirred in to military training films.

From there, I spot the same explosion in the "archival footage". The MGM fake would be the first footage seen by the World representing "nuclear explosion". This footage "was considered so convincing" it was used in Air Corp Training Films..."

MGM's Wizard of Special Effects Arnold Gillispie

Hollywood tries its damnedest to fool us, and they just might have.

http://www.wizardofmgm.com/2012/11/the-wizard-of-mgm-by-arnold-gillespie.html

Eddie is that you?

Edgy Brah, you've gone too far!

Comparing pictures of Hiroshima with Dresden or any other firebombed city in WW2 it becomes clear that it was bombed using conventional firebombs. Some pictures show some flattened parts of the city also show that anything made of stone survived the bombs just fine, suggesting these neighborhoods were likely mostly wood buildings which burned to ashes from a firestorm of incendiary bombs, not from a shockwave from a single nuclear bomb.

Then the great nuclear psyop started which lasts to this day, controlling the world with fear and scamming trillions of dollars.

Here is why a nuke wont make more then a mess if it is blown up by a chunk of C4, dropped in a vulcano, or if the explodives go off unexpectedly. A nuclear explosive device requires several things to happen in a very precise order for it to go boom with the flash of light and mushroom cloud we all know and love.

Several seconds before dentonation... A fuse like "irrevocable arming switch" fires closing the weapons arming system charging circuit. Next a series of high voltage capacitors charge up and ready the firing set and neutron pulse generator. Once charged, a pyrotechnic valve fires and tritium gas fills the center of the pit assembly, if you chose less than max yield a second squib charge pinches the gas fill tube shut with a smaller amount of this gas allowed to fill the pit. Next the weapon awaits the initiation comand signal, it comes from a countdown timer if selected, a proximity radar, or a impact accelerometer similar to the kind that triggers an airbag in a car.

Once this signal comes, a pulse coded light signal goes from the firing signal processing/PAL electronics module down a fiber optic cable to the receiver in the firing set switch array trigger module. Immediately afterwards the array of fast switching tubes calls sprytrons fire. These are small glass vacuum tubes a bit bigger than neon indicator lamps, but hold off a few thousands of volts, with 6 pins. The trigger pulse is applied to two pins on each of these tubes causing them to all fire at once.

The capacitors discharge into the EFI slapper initiation assemblies of the pit assembly. The explosives detonate. When the pulse was applied to the sprytrons, a timer was also triggered that triggers another sprytron to fire just before the pit is fully compressed. When it does a small but powerful neutron pulse generation electron tube fires as the pit is at maximum compression.

If all goes as planned the chain reaction starts and the pit generates lots of energy in the form of gamma rays, neutrons, light, heat, and eventually physical blast pressure. If your weapon is a two stage device the radiation energy from the pit compresses a secondary assembly. A material made of a beryllium carbide loaded foam converts the the strong gamma ray energy from the pit to soft x ray light and delays the neutrons.

The soft x ray light is so powerful it actually compresses the secondary with pressures similar to that found inside the sun. Imagine that, now that is BRIGHT... A consumable snowflake like neutron amplifier made of either plutonium or highly enriched uranium gets hit by the delayed neutrons, undergoes prompt fission, and generates a pulse of neutrons at the right time that ignite the fissile starter assembly of the secondary. This starter acts to convert the lithium 6 in the fusion fuel to tritium. Shortly after this the deuterium and newly created tritium fusion begins releasing lots of neutrons. A neutron spallation wrap on the inner part of the weapon casing reflects the neutrons back at the depleted uranium pusher and tamper causing even more fission. What happens after this is a really big boom...

So yes nuclear bombs are real, and from a nuclear detonation stand point are intrinsically safe, you could make a nasty mess by using extra explosives to blow one up or partially triggering the core explosives, but it will never go nuclear by mistake. I hope they never get used.

"Explanation" is nice, thanks for that.

So, if "explanation" works, why are they faking explosion footage? Also convenient that the replication of "explanation" is impossible.

Thanks, though!

This is not faked, in fact I had a spare part, MO crystal shutter mechanism, to the camera that made that picture. That picture is the very early stages of detonation just after the photonic pulse. The reason it looks like an under water explosion is that the air is compressed so severely by the photonic pulse it is similar to the density of molten aluminum. The image was taken through a narrow tube telescope and filtered through several kinds of glass before being fed to the cameras. What is being shown is mostly the metal casing in the form of superheated plasma.

Thank you for your input, you are definitely a quality commentor.

Just like today when you hear about "depleted uranium" bombs. MOAB with heavy-metal particles involved.

Convetional missiles pack an amazing punch for their size:

Ballistic Missile Wiki