You're writing a shit post about her but other people are obsessed?

/NPC

His post history is mostly shitting on Democrats and Q posts. He doesn’t like it when people diminish the importance of his party’s scapegoat.

You have to admit... She makes it pretty easy to scapegoat her. The DNC laid everything on the altar of The Witch and now they're paying the price. Shit, the crazy cunt is going on a multi-country tour while the Dems know she is absolute poison to aby sort of campaign.

I think the pendulum is going to swing the other way in 2020.

The dems may run an “obama 2.0” character, Tulsi Gabbard who is a member of the globalist think tank group, Council on Foreign Relations. She has a perfect resume, and having her win in 2020 would be a great way to create more division and partisan tension among the American public, which is a big part of how they remain in control.

Your post history has a lot of you calling people NPC's, to the point of irony really.

/NPC

YES!!!1

Stop with this shit or you'll be banned. Final warning.

Using Whataboutism term is a stupid dismiss all technique, it can be use both ways on the argument.

Flip it around and it's accurate too.

whataboutism

I know right? There should be far more criticism of the President and not the divisive soon to be prosecuted War criminal, Thief and Pedovore.

This sounds like bitchinf about politics not conspiracy

Part of the partisan nonsense is because of Hillary.

Advocating not being civil to the opposing party is pretty divisive. It seems to be a popular opinion these days.

I personally got confused at the part where you say her “crimes” are irrelevant. She is responsible for the deaths of thousands of people around the world through her policies as Secretary of State. She is also responsible for the destruction of our planet through her support of fracking.

I get your point, the current administration is bad too, but that doesn’t all of a sudden undo all the horrific things other politicians have done. Wake up and smell your brainwashing.

You can try to convince people to focus their attention/hate on the president, but what good has that done us in the past? Absolute none whatsoever. The majority of Americans don’t even know what the hell is going on in our world and how it became the way it is. Let me tell you, it has NOTHING to do with Democrats or Republicans.

so much this!!!!

Enough with the pavlovian response when someone criticizes their queen Hillary!

Bombings in Syria and deals with Saudi are business as usual; essentially independent of who is in office. They are not unique to the current administration, and would have been an integral part to whichever group happened to be elected.

No one should be above reproach, especially POTUS, regardless of who that POTUS may be. I believe a more directed criticism would be something like, "Trump has stated that Saudi Arabia was involved in 9/11 yet still makes deals with them;" or "Trump appears to be setting the stage to attempt to wrongfully convince the world that rogue factions of MBS's family killed Khashoggi in an attempt to weaken MBS's power while it was actually MBS himself who ordered the killing."

The examples you give would likely occur regardless of who was in office; I believe that to be the most appropriate criticism of those two criticisms, and a major contributor to why you may catch flack when opining about the current president. Specificity is key.

"What is the current administration doing that would likely not be happening under another administration?" should be the driving question.

The back and forth blaming serves to create greater political divisions between left and right, discouraging rational discourse and allowing for the consolidation of power vis a vis the consolidation of the scope of allowable opinion.

The one thing Trump still has going for him, in my eyes, is how upset he seems to make many of the factions that have held power for so long. Maybe it's all an act, or maybe it isn't. No sense in me getting mad at my fellow citizen for something being done by a small group of privileged elite.

Investigate everyone, question everything. We're discussing a topic that bleeds through the line between politics and intelligence, two field full of more lies than most others. To rest so comfortably on held opinions or accepted "facts" is a disservice to the practice of attempting an understanding of conspiracy theories.

If she is a scapegoat, she isn't just a scapegoat. No one is politics is ALL any one thing or another, and it's precisely because of that that they're able to conduct their business so successfully.

This isn't the type of field in which one should have heroes.

I truly don't know which scenario to believe but operate every day with as open a mind as I can. Biggest putsch to claim the opposite would be GA being banned as the Atlantic Council member comes on board Reddit. Uncanny timing.

There's hints in either direction; could be a war between info/disinfo, or it could be someone is setting the whole stage and anticipating our reactions. I'm inclined to believe there are more than 2 groups at play regardless, and that the majority of them benefit by us arguing amongst ourselves rather than calling out bits of political theater.

I would do my name a disservice if I didn't hope for the best in the face of all this shit. I truly believe we're approaching a precipice when it comes to public knowledge of the misdeeds in government that extend beyond the, at times illusory, boundaries between left and right.

#ItWasHerTurn!

Because that particular candidate is also famous for not being prosecuted for obvious crimes. It's the perfect example of a two tier justice system and a true conspiracy.

But any day now right? ANY DAY NOW.

Trump is a great example of your two tier justice system as well. Tax is optional for him.

"Drumpf is FINISHED this time! _#impreach _#resist"

The difference is that #lockherup came from Trump himself. He pulls it out when ever he wants a boost at a rally.

what crimes has she not been investigated for?

Prosecuted and investigated are two separate things.

What crimes should she be prosecuted for?

Imagine if he put her in prison how would you/the majority of the public react? Would it be "oh finally she broke the law and deserved it", or would it be "Look here's the evidence of the facist coup"?

Would this have the effect that it is meant to have even if there was 100% incriminating evidence?

The bitch is literally still trying to rationalize her loss by blaming everyone but herself. Just this past week, she made headlines with her idiotic comments.

I'm fine with it though! Her hubris will be the democrat's fall :D

Until the Clintons are in prison the American justice system is a farce. It has nothing to do with Trump.

Love how Trump said he was going to “put her in jail” too, but then backpeddled right after getting elected.

It’s all a show.

For the love of fuck take this to /r/politics!!

​

​

​