Everything about this post is why I'm running for canada as soon as I can. Just gotta finish the whole college thing (which is a scam in itself, but thats another topic altogether). My other options include England and Australia, and the UAE. (Language barrier, I speak english and arabic.)

isnt canada not far enough dont they want to merge canada mexico and the us to form their super police state?

I'm sorry, if college is a bunch of bullshit to you then just fucking drop out now and run for the border. It's the people that get into universities and colleges that don't believe that furthering their education is worth anything and just want to move to the next level that are cheapening the worth of a collegiate education. GO FUCK YOUR HIGH AND MIGHTY SELF. Unless you were some child genius and haven't lost the title of minor in your collegiate career, there isn't a damn thing keeping you at your college or university and running to the nearest border. Get the fuck out of the country that so many people are proud of if all you are going to do is use her for her benefits and then shit on her once you've entered the "high society" of the world.

go fuck yourself again for good measure

no, fuck YOU.

Thank you. I felt the same way but have gotten to the point where I won't comment because I get slammed by nasty replies from 20-something people who honestly believe that they know everything. If somebody thinks the country is bad or that education is for the lemmings...I want them out.

5.People are submissive and believe everything they are told on TV.

This should be number 1 everything else stems from or is allowed to happen because of this.

[deleted]

[deleted]

I lived in a communist country (Romania) from the day I was born until I was 28 years old and I can tell you that people won't wake up until their stomach are empty and even on a empty stomach they'll stay oppressed for decades. The people in US have it good. They have TV, cheap fast food... why get out and protest and risk jail or to loose their job? There will be no revolution in US in the near future. I foresee that the first step is when some states will break away from the union and become independent.

...#12 : This isn't because of politicians, it's because of the American people and the structure/complexity of politics; it's not a "conspiracy."

These 14 points are all effects of more complicated mediating variables and theoretically-founded causes. It's easy to point out a few splotches of embarrassment and shame in our American society. I think to correct these we need to examine why they happen (what causes these points and what makes us passive and accepting of them).

HEY GUYS OVER HERE I FOUND A TERRORIST!!!!!

For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to evil. Do you want to be unafraid of the authority? Do what is good, and you will have praise from the same.

http://www.talkshoe.com/tc/89643

http://www.talkshoe.com/tc/44889

every reason you stated is what makes me sad about our country. i am embarassed of my government.

i want to run too, like many of you do.

but the shackles of minimum wage jobs extrememly high rent, gas and bills i am no longer financially capable of going to school or traveling

I am 22 yrs old and have never flown (airplane or otherwise) I have never gone on vacation and dont know jack shit about the world for the most part.

to me that is imprisonment

education is shitty, housing is shitty, clothes are expensive so you have to buy cheap/shitty, traveling is out of the question due to finances being shitty, employment is shitty (due to shitty education)

in side comment to education being shitty; put it this way in school i was NEVER taught logic i recently started to understand its conepts along with the ne knowledge of fallacies LESS THEN A YEAR AGO

its a vicious circle which my hands are held in with a metaphorical key

It's already too late.

People just need to accept tyranny and party it up while they still can. Just calm down and listen to some club music, act like you're cool, and masturbate to some free internet porn.

[deleted]

"Completely dominated"? Name me a major network news anchor who is Jewish. Name me a major media company that isn't owned collectively as a corporation by people of many faiths.

Jews write what the anchors read. 90% of all newspapers are run jews.

http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-controlledpress-newspapers.html

Oh yes, Jewwatch.com. I'm sure that's a completely reliable source. For instance, they point out that the current publisher of the New York Times is a man named Arthur Sulzberger. Oh my, shock and horror, there's a Jewish person pursuing a career in that company!! A company that was founded by a man from a long line of Puritan Christians. A company that is publicly traded and thus cannot be said to be owned by any single group. A company that has run editorials critical of Israel like this one: http://alturl.com/5wzqd

If your standard for "dominated by Zionist Jews who (implicitly) are being deceptive and manipulative" is that there are people who work for that company in senior positions who have Jewish names...then you're a racist asshole. First, not everyone with a Jewish sounding name is Jewish. Second, not every Jewish person is a Zionist. Third, even if a Zionist did work for the company, that does not mean that they can't separate their personal beliefs from their professional responsibilities. To presume that you can tell that something nefarious is afoot simply by looking at someone's name, as this website you cite does over and over again, then you're a bigot.

If you actually click over to this website (not recommended), you will see that for their profile of the NYT, they just copied and pasted a 1998 company profile of the New York Times Company produced by Hoover's Company Profiles, and then pointed out that the family that the NYT takes its chairmen from is Jewish, as if there was something inherently nefarious about that. Yes, there appears to be some nepotism in the company, but nepotism is a practice that people all faiths enjoy. I guess if you're a blinkered racist idiot, it suddenly becomes sinister when they do it.

I don't have the time or patience to go through every single link on that page, but skimming several shows that this is pretty much what this page does: it points out that there are these things called media companies, and that many of these media companies are big and own several newspapers, and that some of the senior officers of these companies appear to have Jewish names, and thus the Jews MUST be controlling the what the world thinks. And then it links to information about the secret plot to commit genocide against white people.

If you're concerned about the power of media conglomeration, great, protest to the FCC. But the problem with too few media companies owning too much of the national dialog doesn't have anything to do with the fact that some senior media executives are Jewish, and everything to do with the fact that anyone owning a media monopoly is a bad thing, no matter what religion they are.

And if you're really going to get into media activism, might I suggest that you pick out a medium that isn't dying off left and right? Newspapers are on the way out. I notice that this "scholarly" website doesn't much care about television, radio, film, or the Internet. Maybe that's because the chairman, President, and CEO of Comcast is a guy named Roberts.

tl;dr Fuck you, you fucking Nazi.

[deleted]

Well you would claim that kind of ignorance...if you were a Minnisota sleeper Jew!!

[deleted]

I asked for you to name whoever it is you think is responsible for "Jewish domination" of the media, either on air or behind the scenes. You replied with nervously derisive laugher. It's one of those things that makes me go hmmm...

Katie Couric's mother is Jewish, but she was raised Episcopalian. The only people who would care enough about her mother's religion to consider her Jewish are people who think that religious beliefs are hereditary. I.e. idiots, Nazis, and yourself. But I repeat myself.

Thomas and Sanchez were fired because they said things that were racist bullshit, and their bosses were concerned about how it would look if they stood behind their people when the said racist bullshit in public. The fact that you agree with their racist bullshit doesn't make their firings the result of a sinister cabal exerting untoward influence.

[deleted]

Jews (all of them, together, as a single group rather than a collection of millions of individuals) are the biggest racists on the planet...

Fixed that for ya.

[deleted]

have you seen JIDF wikipedia page?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Internet_Defense_Force

TIL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joel_Stein

[deleted]

actually, i think it means wikipedia has wised up to their ways, and has started banning users and locking down pages.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DavidAppletree

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jewish_Internet_Defense_Force

Your tone was hostile, but I agree.

[deleted]

http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-controlledpress-newspapers.html

http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-controlledpress-folder.html

Citation activated

Jews are 1 standard deviation higher in IQ than all other breeds of human, its no wonder they control everthing. http://lagriffedulion.f2s.com/ashkenaz.htm

So it sucks that they only look out for their interests and many dont give a fuck about us goyem.

[deleted]

Yes breeds, races whatever.

If the jews actually did control the media, how would you know assuming they wanted to keep it a secret?

[deleted]

[deleted]

Don't like where a conversation is heading?

INVOKE THE HOLOCAUST!!

Well, if they did...

They'd probably make sure anybody working in the media that says they do, gets fired.

Hmm, that's actually happened a few times.

Oh yes, Jewwatch.com. I'm sure that's a completely reliable source. For instance, they point out that the current publisher of the New York Times is a man named Arthur Sulzberger. Oh my, shock and horror, there's a Jewish person pursuing a career in that company!! A company that was founded by a man from a long line of Puritan Christians. A company that is publicly traded and thus cannot be said to be owned by any single group. A company that has run editorials critical of Israel like this one: http://alturl.com/5wzqd

If your standard for "dominated by Zionist Jews who (implicitly) are being deceptive and manipulative" is that there are people who work for that company in senior positions who have Jewish names...then you're a racist asshole. First, not everyone with a Jewish sounding name is Jewish. Second, not every Jewish person is a Zionist. Third, even if a Zionist did work for the company, that does not mean that they can't separate their personal beliefs from their professional responsibilities. To presume that you can tell that something nefarious is afoot simply by looking at someone's name, as this website you cite does over and over again, then you're a bigot.

If you actually click over to this website (not recommended), you will see that for their profile of the NYT, they just copied and pasted a 1998 company profile of the New York Times Company produced by Hoover's Company Profiles, and then pointed out that the family that the NYT takes its chairmen from is Jewish, as if there was something inherently nefarious about that. Yes, there appears to be some nepotism in the company, but nepotism is a practice that people all faiths enjoy. I guess if you're a blinkered racist idiot, it suddenly becomes sinister when they do it.

I don't have the time or patience to go through every single link on that page, but skimming several shows that this is pretty much what this page does: it points out that there are these things called media companies, and that many of these media companies are big and own several newspapers, and that some of the senior officers of these companies appear to have Jewish names, and thus the Jews MUST be controlling the what the world thinks. And then it links to information about the secret plot to commit genocide against white people.

If you're concerned about the power of media conglomeration, great, protest to the FCC. But the problem with too few media companies owning too much of the national dialog doesn't have anything to do with the fact that some senior media executives are Jewish, and everything to do with the fact that anyone owning a media monopoly is a bad thing, no matter what religion they are.

And if you're really going to get into media activism, might I suggest that you pick out a medium that isn't dying off left and right? Newspapers are on the way out. I notice that this "scholarly" website doesn't much care about television, radio, film, or the Internet. Maybe that's because the chairman, President, and CEO of Comcast is a guy named Roberts.

tl;dr Fuck you, you fucking Nazi.