Abstinence-only sex education and anti-abortion brainwashing are one of many ways the rich keep control over the poor
62 2011-01-15 by danxmason
Education about birth control and anti-abortion propaganda are instituted from the very highest levels. It's not about religion. Religion is only the front. The rich need a surplus of poor uneducated people to continue working at minimum wage. The best way to do that is to make sure the majority of people have a lot of children at a young age, prevent them from getting an education, and trap them for life.
*Edit: * Regarding planned parenthood are you guys even paying attention? Planned parenthood is something the rich have constantly been trying to shut down for ages. The institution has been around for 90 years, things have changed. Have you ever seen a media piece glorifying planned parenthood? I haven't. Look an article from 2 days ago talking about how the rich are trying to shut it down.
*Edit: * Regarding abortion: the reason Roe V Wade isn't overturned is because the rich still want exercise their right to abortion. They say one thing but do another. The rich want to continue having abortions but don't want the poor to do the same. So they brainwash the poor into thinking it's bad. And this is why Roe V Wade will never ever be changed.
51 comments
15 papercrafted 2011-01-15
wut, i thought planed parent hood was started by the eugenics movment
7 p8balla89 2011-01-15
Yes it was. Margaret Sanger started it to give birth control to immigrants so they would not reproduce and thus be weened out of the population.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Sanger
5 Aachor 2011-01-15
While abortion kills them off so they are no longer a blight on society?
ಠ_ರೃ
4 WolterHunter 2011-01-15
Wow... I hope you don't actually believe that bullshit.
Seriously, do some actual digging into American political and social history, especially the far-right and its long growing relationship with Christian radicalism. You just might learn something.
3 danxmason 2011-01-15
The rich use Christian radicalism as a stepping stone to push their agendas. Tea-party anyone?
2 WolterHunter 2011-01-15
The rich don't give a rat's ass about abortion or religion or any of that shit. They just fund a few crazies with a big enough following in order to keep everyone fighting and distracted while they take all the wealth in the confusion.
It's a common tactic, and is one of the most effective means to amass wealth.
1 [deleted] 2011-01-15
NEVER!
4 cojoco 2011-01-15
So how come Roe vs. Wade has not been overturned?
Your comment might have some validity if it reflected the truth in any way whatsoever.
2 danxmason 2011-01-15
Roe v Wade will never be overturned because the rich want access to abortion.
1 cojoco 2011-01-15
The rich want access to cocaine, too, and they get it.
4 _red 2011-01-15
The elite are far more interested in eugenics then they are about getting workers.
Moreover, why would they want dumb illiterate slaves....when they have smart educated slaves, like yourself. (and I don't mean that as a put down to you personally....I mean they have some of the smartest people working for them, completely beholden via their paper money debt system)
5 danxmason 2011-01-15
Eugenics is so 1945. The 21st century is about making the rich richer and poor poorer. Dumb illiterate slaves work for minimum wage and lack the intelligence to create better working conditions. Smart educated slaves demand higher wages with benefits.
3 BubbaRay88 2011-01-15
I think the complete opposite is true, Planned Parenthood was started by a complete nutjob that wanted poor/dumb/ethnic people to stop breeding.
4 Vercingetorixxx 2011-01-15
What a nutjob. People should just breed until they have to stack up on each other to sleep. How about thinking about the future for once?
1 danxmason 2011-01-15
90 years ago that was true. Things have changed a bit since then.
3 bigkr88 2011-01-15
Good idea, bad logic. What we're seeing instead is a reversal of the trend created after industrialization, where labor unions first managed to rise up and start demanding rights thanks to their superior numbers and united mindset, which as a result led to higher standards of living which decreased the number of children being born. By reversing this trend, then sabotaging higher education with tuition hikes until college is no longer seen as viable (plus federal control over college loans and placing them under the jurisdiction of the IRS making them seem more dangerous loans to take), deconstruction of labor unions, sabotaging of lower education (which is essentially what no child left behind has become), and trapping the most violent of our generation in either endless wars or prison, plus pacifying and disuniting the rest of us (television for pacification, and reality shows which generally promote conflict between cast members to gain viewers), they can recreate the industrialization's era of relatively low wages and poor standards of living while actively preventing the return of labor unions.
Also, I would disagree that it's completely separate from religious belief; the people who pass the laws probably believe in their dogma. The people who provide the election funding, though, like the Koch brothers, are the ones who benefit from having a higher populated but less educated America.
0 danxmason 2011-01-15
I agree with most of what you said. Which is why I said it is "one of the ways" the rich control the poor. The rich have intertwined their social agendas into typical religious rhetoric so that they have faithful zombies doing all the brunt work for them. The distrust of science with the failing of education goes hand in hand with anti-family-planning to create a class of people trapped in minimum wage forever.
3 [deleted] 2011-01-15
The rich would still be able to get abortions even if it weren't legal.
1 danxmason 2011-01-15
Ability and ease of ability are different matters.
2 sh1tz 2011-01-15
Sure I believe in what others may call conspiracies but This is the stupidest shit I've hurd.
2 wasappenin 2011-01-15
Yep, throw a few guns in the equation that our fonduing fathers knew just like the rich would keep the black man down. /s
1 LeonoreRootes 2011-01-15
Abortion remains a capital crime under Islamic Law!
As well as being on the wrong side of the capital strictures of Islam, Dxm is pushing a BS agenda re the status of workers!! The trade unions were infiltrated by Jews, who received support from the same Zionist sponsored media that turned a blind eye to Jew crime.
Jew Abe Saffron described as Australia's most notorious crime figure, was behind the fire that killed seven school students at Sydney's Luna Park ghost train in June 1979.
The same Jews sent selected traitors to the Zionist operated Lenin Institute in Moscow, they received the "Old Man of the Mountain" treatment, named after an Afghan warlord who plied his delinquent followers with hashish and prostitutes.
They then went on errands at his behest, killing looting and plundering before returning to the Mountain for another toke, and a further session with a poxed up whore!
These same Lenin Institute scabs were endorsed as trade union leaders, whose role was to drive the respective unions into the ground, simultaneously Skull & Bones type recruitment was underway at schools and universities.
They got the same Ziomedia treatment that elevated their personas to cult status, witness the elevation of Bob Hawke from zero to hero by the mainstream Rupert Murdoch owned press, with staged industrial front victories that were as transparent as his claim to represent the workers.
He became Prime Minister, and broke the Airline Pilots strike with Air Force pilots, then brought in legislation that eliminated ninety two out of one hundred and forty nine trade unions in this country, whence wages and conditions went backwards
http://www.dockersunion.net/journals/Page6.htm
As well Hawke was an associate of Jew Sir Peter Abels, described by former British PM Tony Blair as the "Mr Big" of Australian crime, and the great champion of abortion genocide that has near totaled the Australian landscape, while Irish, Dutch, Albanian and New Zealand scabs are flown in to take the jobs of those Australians who stuck by their union principles.
Too bad "they" are on the wrong side of capital 911 legislation, means the same politicians that turned from the fire at the Ghost Train, and put immigrant scabs into the workforce, that killed Australia in abortion clinics,
Then brought the same Tamil terrorists wanted for capital terrorism in Sri Lanka, and murderous African blacks into the land while local blacks kill in groups fifteen strong, and no one is prosecuted .. too bad for the same blacks and their fancy pants lawyers that they are on the wrong side of the law .. diligent prosecution should hang the lot!
1 [deleted] 2011-01-15
i am offended at the demeaning connotations associated with hashish smoking, sir.
1 [deleted] 2011-01-15
Crazy is easy to spot in /r/conspiracy because it has a much longer word count, of which the word "Jew" comprises at least 10%.
1 [deleted] 2011-01-15
[deleted]
1 danxmason 2011-01-15
Which is why the anti-abortion rhetoric is so prevalent.
2 [deleted] 2011-01-15
[deleted]
3 danxmason 2011-01-15
It helps when the cheap unskilled labour actually speaks the language you need them to use for work
The borders certainly aren't closed. I haven't seen a shortage of Mexicans working in the fields or hotels of california lately.
Gates is an exception not a rule because he depends on highly skilled labour.
-1 [deleted] 2011-01-15
[deleted]
2 danxmason 2011-01-15
No they are exploitable immediately. Let's say I own a bunch of fast food restaurants or cheap retail stores. Not only do I get a surplus of unskilled labour by teenagers having children and not being able to go to college. But I also have more customers. There is no waiting about it, the benefits are immediate, measurable and tangible.
Also, I can't really hire non-english speaking immigrants to sell clothes or hamburgers can I?
1 fsdfsdfsfsd 2011-01-15
well maybe they used to need loads of poor, but now they don't really. robots are better.
1 danxmason 2011-01-15
Yes but robots can't sell merchandise or fast food... yet.
1 [deleted] 2011-01-15
Don't know what you're on about but I'm in California and back when I was in high school (and even elementary school) they didn't teach abstinence... Abortion was a touchy subject but using condoms WAS encouraged.
1 danxmason 2011-01-15
Abstinence-only sex education tells teenagers that they should be sexually abstinent until marriage and does not provide information about contraception. In the Kaiser study, 34% of high-school principals said their school's main message was abstinence-only.
1 accountt1234 2011-01-15
Both the Rockefeller Foundation, and the BIll and Melinda Gates foundation donate money for abortion.
1 danxmason 2011-01-15
The rockefeller foundation was formed in 1913. This is hardly relevant to today.
Bill gates donates internationally and has little use for unskilled labour.
0 [deleted] 2011-01-15
If you get pregnant or get someone pregnant, you chose that. Nobody forced you too. Take personal responsibility for your actions.
0 [deleted] 2011-01-15
no one goes into sex with intentions of getting pregnant. sometimes pregnancy is an accident.
0 likeagsix 2011-01-15
thats a big generalization...and generalizations have no credibility
2 danxmason 2011-01-15
are you sure you're in the right subreddit?
0 [deleted] 2011-01-15
[deleted]
2 danxmason 2011-01-15
Actually the opposite is true. If I am a rich business owner employing unskilled labour, then I want as many unskilled labourers looking for work as possible. If I engineer a society so that there is always a surplus of unskilled labour, then I never have to worry about paying above minimum wage.
Therefore, one would expect the unemployment amongst unskilled labourers to always be above zero. Thus proving the rich do want poorly-educated citizens.
2 pion314 2011-01-15
hahaha this is literally the dumbest comment i've ever read on reddit
1 packetfire 2011-01-15
Fine, then YOU explain why families with too many kids are wanted by "the rich", and how that helps them.
Pointing and saying "ha ha" is not an actual contribution to the discussion.
-1 CrabQueen 2011-01-15
Had to upvote this article because most of the comments on the thread are so spot on. And about "abstinence only" sex ed...I went to a parochial school during the sex ed years and it was made very clear to us that sex could potentially equal baby. We learned the mechanics, complete with pics and videos. I fail to see how this promotes teenage pregnancy in any way.
2 danxmason 2011-01-15
The stats speak for themselves. The US has the highest teen pregnancy rate in the world because of abstinence only education. It doesn't directly promote pregnancy, but indirectly fuels it by with-holding important contraceptive information.
-2 ellipse2411 2011-01-15
naive...
-2 tsloughter 2011-01-15
When did r/conspiracy turn into r/socialism. And thats not a complaint :).
Though I guess it belongs in r/conspiracy if OP thinks there is some shadow government who plans abstinence only education and anti-abortion brainwashing/laws/etc....
-2 wakeupjackass 2011-01-15
You're so fucking backwards you should be ashamed of yourself. Go look up Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood. Birth control and abortion are rich whitey's most prolific tools to rid the planet of brown people. Seriously.
2 danxmason 2011-01-15
Welcome to the 21st century. Things have changed a bit since 1916.
-1 wakeupjackass 2011-01-15
Two out of every 5 babies in NYC is aborted. Most of those are minorities. If that hadn't been happening the last half century, they wouldn't be minorities.
Wakeupjackass.
2 danxmason 2011-01-15
First, I'm talking about rich vs poor. Not white vs minority. No one cares about race in the 21st century. The rich only care about money.
Second, even if your point was relevant, it's wrong. Most abortions are for white women. 57.8%.
0 wakeupjackass 2011-01-15
Poor minorities didn't erect this shit.
"1.Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature."
Or fund this.
Or propose this.
-2 Alexis_ 2011-01-15
No, piss poor lazy parents that don't talk about these things with their kids are what makes their kids poor in the future.
Seriously, something as important and touchy as sex and abortions should be handled by parent. At least I wouldn't trust the jesus freaks running the school system to do it!
4 danxmason 2011-01-15
The Jesus freaks already do it and the poor don't know any better. Which is why the US has the highest teenage pregnancy rate of any other country in the world.
1 danxmason 2011-01-15
Ability and ease of ability are different matters.
2 danxmason 2011-01-15
Roe v Wade will never be overturned because the rich want access to abortion.