Too bad he wasn't voting for war, empire, or nation building. Get your facts straight, and maybe actually read H.J.R. 64; read H.R. 3074 & H.R.3076 while you're at it. Read the speech he gave just before the vote.
Right. Because any member of congress is going to refuse to send food, and supplies for the troops and I'm sure if he did their would be zero public blow back and no way it could be spun against him.
11 comments
15 [deleted] 2011-06-26
here's the reason:
http://lewrockwell.com/paul/paul748.html
1 chlo99 2011-06-26
Sounds exactly like Ron Paul, when he voted for the war in Afghanistan and then says he didn't vote for the funding. relating to .
9 [deleted] 2011-06-26
Not odd. Common hypocrisy.
1 tr3n7y 2011-06-26
Not just for the English anymore.
8 Bacore 2011-06-26
So they can go into their next election saying "I voted against Obama's war in Libya" while forgetting to mention "I also voted not to defund it"
-9 darkgatherer 2011-06-26
Sounds exactly like Ron Paul, when he voted for the war in Afghanistan and then says he didn't vote for the funding.
7 rfswanson 2011-06-26
Too bad he wasn't voting for war, empire, or nation building. Get your facts straight, and maybe actually read H.J.R. 64; read H.R. 3074 & H.R.3076 while you're at it. Read the speech he gave just before the vote.
Really nice try though.
2 my_cat_joe 2011-06-26
Isn't it a little odd ...the last 50 years of American politics?
1 Bearsinahospital 2011-06-26
If you have even a remote understanding of how to system actually works then this is not odd at all.
3 rocknameded 2011-06-26
Right. When will these dumbfucks learn that the system works on manipulation and lies. lol, morons.
1 Zombabies 2011-06-26
Right. Because any member of congress is going to refuse to send food, and supplies for the troops and I'm sure if he did their would be zero public blow back and no way it could be spun against him.