People all over the world basically thought they could get something for nothing. Now they are indebted to illegal central banking cartels.

The Internet is bypassing government propaganda MSM. People are waking up to the fact that they are tax livestock for "socialist" bankers.

Things haven't been what they seem. Public schools have lied to us. People are now taking the red pill.

Sit back and enjoy the show.

I would say that it's very important not to sit back. Start organizing your community to grow its own food. The food shortages coming up are the tool to get us all hungry enough to accept the One World Order.

I'm growing fruit trees. I plan to barter fruit for other edible items, products/services if the shtf.

Isn't the EU going in the opposite direction of world government though by breaking up? Also some countries are going to potentially ditch/get thrown out of the Euro and go back to their own currencies.

Seems counter-NWO to me.

This. It seems the great Euro experiment is epic failing. Though In fact I like the idea of having some financial institutions that compete with the US Fed and now their talking about making an independent credit ratings agency to compete with S&P moody's and fitch. It's difficult to see how a european central bank, financial regulators, and independent agencies would work without a Euro if it does collapse.

Let's hope this happens.

If you break down all the pieces you can fit them together however you want

The same can be said for conspiracy theories. Just saying.

Touche

The EU isn't breaking up. What are you smoking?

It has begun.

[deleted]

True, but this is the Endgame.

For some reason people don't realize world governance has been here for a long time, and is now ending.

But it's ending like a movie monster, all thrashy and fearsome.

World government proponents are accelerating current events.

But they are not going to win. Many are awakening throughout the world.

downvoted in 12 seconds...not even enough time to read the text...

Reddit fudges on the numbers as a way to fool spam bots. Worry more about your message than the votes.

I've definitely thought this. If the other two credit agencies downgrade the U.S. then start downgrading the U.S. banks, interest rates are going to increase and it's going to hurt the U.S. consumer the worst. If the U.S. currency collapses, there will HAVE to be some kind of alternative as the dollar is used most everywhere. For oil in the Middle East, China is holding almost half of our debt in treasury bonds. I'm 95% certain that this is an attempt to bring about the North American Union and the Amero.

China is holding almost half of our debt in treasury bonds

I agree with everything except this. China has a little over $1Trillion out of our total debt of $14Trillion, how is that half?

yeah, we own most of it in our retirement accounts...yes we're fucked

I used to think the amero was next...I'm suspicious as to whether there will be a unified currency...a little more adventurous, but isn't that what China is pushing for?

In the stepping stones approach, there is a real feeling that the elite are going to make a leap instead of a step, as shit is unraveling too fast.

We already have world government. Well, TPTB already control a large portion of the earth. It would take a huge world war to gain the rest of the few remaining countries like China.

This is not a stupid question.

Al Gore urges Keith Olbermann watchers we nee an "American Spring". Sorry no link from iPhone. Go to current.com

With the exception of China it would appear to be implying, if anything, the opposite.

Nope.

Give me any time in recent human history and I could point to certain events and construct a narrative that would imply some kind of New World Order.

The time we are living in is not special, these events are not special. Also, prescribing significant world events to a higher power (for which you have zero proof) is no different than attributing it to a deity.

And I'm serious about that first sentence, by the way. Give me a year and I will construct a narrative using the world events of that time that will sound an awful lot like this one.

A rational thought? Upvote for you.

I'll take you up on that. 1976. Go.

Define new world order.

A world order that is newer than the current one.

Succinctly put.

A global dominance hierarchy wherein all of the people are dependent upon the central global government for their basic needs. The full victory of the plutocracy, in which the elite are the secret rulers and depopulate the world intentionally, except for the few that are going to be necessary to serve the elite. A global slave-state where the market is the ultimate ruler, directed by the plutocrats, and the only way you can participate in the market is through the assent of the governors. A BOOT PLACED DIRECTLY ON YOU AND YOUR CHILDREN'S NECKS FOREVER.

And who wants this?

And how do they benefit?

And most importantly, how would this benefit the 'plutocracy'? The currrent structure seems to suit them quite fine.

In: War and Military History [Edit categories]

Suze Orman's Money Classwww.pbs.org Creating A New American Dream Watch March 8, Tuesday, 7 PM On PBS

Ads [Improve] Five special interests to consider Usually special interest groups. Most disagreements could be better solved from the point of view of the "average" citizen by negotiation. However the good of the average citizen does not drive government policies. In most nations there are groups with an axe to grind. Some want more territory or access to resources, some are hateful of other ethnic or religious bands, and some simply want to sell their goods or services to the highest bidder. War creates a bigger market for certain specialized goods and services. For some private companies and certain branches of government, peace is a disaster.

When the decision is being made whether or not to go to war, special interest groups are much more influential than the average citizen. Here are five to consider.

1. The profit motive is always present for the companies who supply war materials. (Now that the United States has privatized many aspects of war-making, these types of companies have proliferated and tasted the honey. This lobby will be gaining in power.)

2. Military and intelligence branches of government that do business with the aforementioned companies are staffed with people who have made a career of war and may be looking to be hired by one of the companies they are doing business with after their government service is over. These branches also directly benefit from war by having their budgets increased and their sense of importance raised. Also, once a war starts, prior intelligence failures or missed opportunities may be glossed over by the need to address the crisis at hand. Critical oversight is weakened.

3. Access to territory and the natural resources in it can motivate non-military companies or special interest groups to promote a war as a means of gaining preferential access.

4. If a religious disagreement is involved, the religious group most savvy in lobbying the government may join forces with the other interest groups to sell the conflict. They may never realize a true long term benefit, but they can vociferously support a war anyway.

5. In modern society, the media may also be enlisted to sell war. If media outlets find they will be rewarded for sending pro-war messages or disseminating false or misleading information, the profit motive may cause them to avoid or minimize anti-war messages or opinions. A threat to withhold the purchase of ad time or to boycott advertised products could also be used to alter the media slant on a conflict. Even letter writing or e-mail campaigns, if well organized, could serve to pressure media to favor a particular line of reasoning. The average citizen writes no letter, sends no e-mail to the media, so a small, focused minority can seem larger than life.

After the decision has been made to attack, it becomes very difficult to change course later, even if other facts come to light. In the worst scenario, some early military successes embolden the politicians to broaden the scope of the war, and serve to quiet dissent. This can lead to a world war. Even when things eventually turn bad in the public eye, what politician could hope to succeed in the government by stating "I was duped by special interests into a stupid war, and a lot of people died unneccessarily, but I'll do better next time"? At this point instead of inviting the citizens to question the workings of the government, politicians emphasize patriotism and religion to keep the populace in line. No one wants to seem unpatriotic when their relatives are dying in combat. In WWII, the Germans put "Gott mit Uns" on their soldiers belt buckles.

Power, control, and corporate control of all land for any purpose. Any and all political/corporate issues with local government and or the local people would be overridden by the new world government whose system of values we have no idea what it will be like. And if you think we can just undo it, it won't be that easy. It might take world war 3 to make it happen.

World War 3 between who?

And who is creating this new world order?

very broad question. short answer: international banks, NATO, and a few Families with a lot of wealth and power.

And ww3 between us and them?

I'm growing fruit trees. I plan to barter fruit for other edible items, products/services if the shtf.