i think there is more going on. something far more important that they are trying to hide. or, they are making it appear that way to dumbfound the public so they can do whatever they want and the public freezes like mice in a snakes den. keep the public confused, divide and conquer.

We just don't really know for sure one way or the other. However, from what I've seen in my lifetime, if people in power in the government say it's true... then it is most likely false.

Not unless you get off the couch and make it happen. Find a way.

And they wonder why the troops support Ron Paul.

Must You Capitalize Each Word?

Well, that's surely a senseless rant, but I'd suggest you use this as an opportunity to recommend a book to him: it sounds like he's ripe to understanding The Shock Doctrine and how the elite operate. Now, if only he'd see that Obama, Clinton, McCain and Romney have more in common with each other than they do with any of us...

You reckon they might have staged 30 navy seals dying to subside any retaliation on them or their families? This seems like the most logical. You honestly think 30 of the top military warriors wouldnt have the slightest hint something was up?

You can't have a govt who everyone says is a pack of idiots. Then the next day they are plotting diabolical conspiracies to control how the world operates..... People don't keep secrets.

The point made by Jones and others is that the people running the conspiracy are not the people in government. The elected politicians are stooges. A small elite pull their strings, using bribes and threats of career assassination.

If you are smart enough to control governments and the like then you don't crash everything and send us down the road weve been going.

If you want to steal a shitload you make it look like there is very little that is supposed to be there in the first place. Make sense?

Not in the least. If there is very little then people keep track of what is left. When there is excess no so much

I mean, the current situation is the aftermath. The coverup if you will. As in - we have little money because, look, everything is shit, not because I stole it all.

So who stole all the money.......

http://www.alternet.org/economy/145884/how_the_monsters_at_goldman_sachs_caused_a_greek_tragedy?page=entire

Notice how no one seriously delves into who profited most from Greek spending? Notice how getting things fixed is the main news? Everything is shit and we need to fix it, never mind why we're here. That's my point. Also, to answer your question, I don't know for sure. I do know however that money just does not vanish. It's a bit too valuable of a tool for the rulers to just let that happen. Someone is sitting on all the trillions missing from the worlds people, that's for sure.

LOL you hand me a website aimed at bad mouthing Goldman sacs. Yea I will admit there is some corruption in the world. However if your gonna attempt to call bankers the devil who's fault is it for dealing with him? What I got out of that article is the Greek nation got screwed over by their politicians and not some mysterious elite. The Greeks didn't have to take the money. Nope they could have told the people bad news. Instead they lied and now it's time to pay the piper. Also 300 million is a far cry from trillions of dollars my friend.

That was an example to illustrate how easy it is to get governments into these situations. The same happened in america. The guy who's in office for 4 years gives not a shit if the next guy after him has to deal with the insane rates of the loan he approved to keep his budjet balanced. No conspiracy here, just the lasyness of the average human exploited by the bank whitch is the legal face of the reptiles xD. A lil joke there to remind you that I don't claim to have all the answers. I just don't believe the offical story you subscribe to either. It's a little too easy for me. I really do believe the banksters would not lead their cash cows to slaughter unless they expect to get rewarded handsomely.

Why not? You have everything you need and by crashing economies, you make what you have a boatload more valuable

Hasn't the dollar and euro generally devalued since the economies crashed?

without question; but you are making the assumption that they keep their entire wealth in one of those currencies. At a certain point retaining all of your worth in one currency guarantees failure, as a light day's turn in the strength of one could cost you whole percentages of your actual, real-world value. On the other hand, tradeable materials rarely lose value, and as certain commodities become more necessary, or rare, they tend to multiply in value, and particularly well in regions where people's money doesn't go as far anymore. Most people point to gold, and it is a good example (check out how it essentially doubles in its weight against the USD during the post 2008 crash), but other minerals (like cobalt, palladium, or copper) can grow three or four fold over the period of a couple of years, when products that require massive amounts of them (apple...) hit the markets

Of course this assumes that the easy route of hedging against the crashing economies isn't being implemented.

But wouldn't it just be easier to sell in volume (more people with more money buy more). Than plotting to debt countries into submission. I just don't see a lot of money to be made at that game. When countries get desperate wars break out and after ww2 the German currency was worth more as fire wood than actual money. The only rational reason to do such things is if one country is attempting through economic means to destroy others. Blame china I guess?