Tony Scott was one of the directors the government asked to develop terror scenarios.
5 2012-08-20 by [deleted]
After the 9-11 attacks, it was widely reported that the government met with Hollywood directors and producers to help them come up with attack ideas. The producers thought they were coming up with ideas so we could stop potential attacks, but they were really being used to help plan false flags. Tony Scott was one of those directors. He got too close. He was too accurate. He knew a false flag using his idea had happened or was about to happen.
50 comments
6 Trainasauruswrecks 2012-08-20
Okay.... interesting theory... facts GO!
2 [deleted] 2012-08-20
http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/yiygm/tony_scott_brother_of_ridley_and_director_of_top/
1 Trainasauruswrecks 2012-08-20
Now I want to know what the notes said. FOIA? Is that a possibility?
-1 BadgerGecko 2012-08-20
Still waiting......
2 [deleted] 2012-08-20
http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/yiygm/tony_scott_brother_of_ridley_and_director_of_top/
-1 BadgerGecko 2012-08-20
Does not prove anything
2 [deleted] 2012-08-20
The request was for facts, not for proof.
0 BadgerGecko 2012-08-20
The article contain no facts whatsoever regarding this as a conspiracy the closest it comes to saying anything different
This merely a biog of his cinematic history.
There are more pressing matter concerning us like Assange at the moment.....
2 [deleted] 2012-08-20
Says you.
Yes. change the subject. BTW, have you read the Gentleperson's Guide, over there in the sidebar? -->
Assange is the longest running sideshow drama in the history of psyops. That shit rears its head any time anything of real importance surfaces.
1 BadgerGecko 2012-08-20
Quote one live from that article that states a fact that is a conspiracy please
I have not read it the gentleman's guide but will do later, thank you for that.(truthfully, no sarcasm here) Have you read redetiquette? with regards for not down voting a comment merely because you disagree with it?
Assange got mentioned purely because it was you, and at the moment there is no facts for this death to be of importance in the subreddit.
0 [deleted] 2012-08-20
You are now the judge of what constitutes relevance to conspiracy? Oh, pardon me. I didn't realize you had been appointed.
I didn't downvote you for disagreeing. I downvoted you for sidetracking the discussion with the Assange reference - changing the subject to something not relevant to the posted submission.
because it was me what? sentence fragment. you riled up or something? Can you please try to form coherent thoughts before you post?
Says you. Opinions are like assholes. Everyone's got one. Yours doesn't take precedence over those of others.
1 BadgerGecko 2012-08-20
At least you live up to your flair
0 [deleted] 2012-08-20
I earned that shit, bro. ;)
2 BadgerGecko 2012-08-20
By you directing me to the gentlemans guide, are you helping me look out for them or accusing me?
Because I can assure you that I'm just a dude with an interest in the alternative way of thinking.
Straight talking here, I was trying to be a bigger ass hole than you. I just haven't got the energy for that so you win. The assange thing was a little comic dig at our previous conversation elsewhere. Did not mean to take this off topic at all. With regards to the Tony Scott thing, there is very little suspicious evidence (IMO) at the moment and was just fed up with the influx of this topic so soon. I don't think it does us any credit as a community to jump on every event too quickly, and cry conspiracy. The boy who cried wolf comes to mind.
Peace bro
2 [deleted] 2012-08-20
p.s. I should also add (and truly, this is just a helpful offering to consider)...
If you decide r/conspiracy isn't for you, but want to continue exploring similar material from a skeptical point of view, there's a subreddit for that: r/skeptic
If you decide you hate us and want to teach us a lesson for being wackjob nutcases crying wolf, there's a subreddit for that, too. r/conspiratard
I'm not suggesting you join either of those at this time. I'm just saying... here, we discuss and explore conspiracy theories. I think you could be an asset to this subreddit once you understand what this community is doing... how it does it (sometimes with rank speculation as a beginning point)... et cetera.
Again...
peace
0 [deleted] 2012-08-20
No one can be a bigger ass than me. I guess you learned your lesson. (Sorry. Just had to prove it.)
Peace offering accepted.
Peace.
5 3_times_a_lady 2012-08-20
is there any evidence of any kind that has led you to think any of these things or are completely speculating
5 [deleted] 2012-08-20
It's his theory. We are in /r/conspiracy. This sub deals with theories. If it were a fact it would be posted somewhere else. While I do agree that more facts should be posted to help his theory be proven either right or wrong. This is how this sub used to work, it went theory first, secondly, discussion and possible "evidence" for or against said theory, finally opinions were formed. not anymore sadly.
2 [deleted] 2012-08-20
http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/yiygm/tony_scott_brother_of_ridley_and_director_of_top/
0 k5k9 2012-08-20
I came here to ask this.
3 w122 2012-08-20
Wag the Dog (1997) - Trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnSauj2855M
1 pickengrin 2012-08-20
This should be movie of the week
1 w122 2012-08-20
yes, it should..
3 DoctorMiracles 2012-08-20
Well, it's not like he saw where surveillance technology was headed...
1 tilfordkage 2012-08-20
Actually, that would be David Marconi, the guy that wrote that movie.
2 [deleted] 2012-08-20
So he learned nothing while directing it?
1 tilfordkage 2012-08-20
My point is that the writer would probably be dead too if that particular movie was relevant.
2 [deleted] 2012-08-20
[deleted]
1 tilfordkage 2012-08-20
People can get very upset over the most trivial of things, no level of richness or success will change that.
2 tilfordkage 2012-08-20
Well that is certainly interesting. I remember hearing about the government talking to directors about that, who were the other directors?
2 [deleted] 2012-08-20
Who were the other writers?
1 tilfordkage 2012-08-20
I honestly don't know if any writers were approached or not, but there were definitely a few directors approached.
2 [deleted] 2012-08-20
Stanley Kubrick?
1 tilfordkage 2012-08-20
Not sure about that, I think the directors were approached after 9/11, so that would rule out Kubrick and his work.
1 tilfordkage 2012-08-20
He was working on Top Gun 2. Which was apparently going to focus on the use of drones in modern aerial combat.
0 frostek 2012-08-20
FFS! The guy's not even been dead for 24 hours, and you're circling him already?
10 [deleted] 2012-08-20
I don't understand at all why you believe free discussion of news events related to r/conspiracy should be discouraged.
-5 frostek 2012-08-20
A respectful 24 hours would have been nice is all I'm saying.
Call me old-fashioned if you like.
-4 [deleted] 2012-08-20
tl;dr: Nothing to see here, citizen. Move along.
2 greenw40 2012-08-20
tl;dr: Generic self-righteous response that adds nothing to the discussion.
0 [deleted] 2012-08-20
Oh, and frostek's did? Hello conspiratard. This subreddit is ruined. Fuck.
-1 greenw40 2012-08-20
At least it showed a little respect for the dead. And maybe that lack of respect is what ruined this subreddit, that and ignorance.
1 [deleted] 2012-08-20
[deleted]
4 greenw40 2012-08-20
I didn't downvote this, I'm just pointing out that every single death isn't a conspiracy.
1 tilfordkage 2012-08-20
Of course it is!
All kidding aside, it is really interesting that the did that for the government, but then again, no other directors tied to that event have died (that I know of), so this is probably nothing. Interesting for sure, and most definitely thought provoking, but probably not important.
2 [deleted] 2012-08-20
The obvious connnection: Tony Scott wrote the script and planned the Aurora attacks. It makes perfect sense when you think about it, and now I can't see it going down any other way. They hire Scott to write the script for the events, they carry out the attacks just as he wrote, but he either realizes that he wasn't writing a drill, or just suddenly wants to blow the whistle, and then they clean up. Look at his filmography. There's no one in Hollywood who they would have wanted to pick before him. Now that my mind has opened up to this theory, it's the only viable option.
0 [deleted] 2012-08-20
He "jumped" off of a bridge in LA.
1 [deleted] 2012-08-20
Makes perfect sense, no?
2 [deleted] 2012-08-20
I don't know where you came from or why you decided to join us at this time, but I want you to know that your input has not gone unnoticed by me.
While you will likely be (eventually) harassed for making huge speculative leaps, that's how theories are formed. That's how we, as a group, vet information. By asking "what if", based on existing fact (e.g., in this instance, his filmography).
2 [deleted] 2012-08-20
I've been here for a while but really got active when all the impostors showed up to to spew lies about Robert Holmes not testifying. We need the truth now more than ever, not their weasel ways.
1 [deleted] 2012-08-20
That's what I noticed. :) Upvoted.
0 BadgerGecko 2012-08-20
This comment got buried
So can we answers this are all the other directors Alive? I do not buy for a second he has been bumped off. At least with the amount of facts presented. Yet to see a fact of any kind that can be substantiated
1 tilfordkage 2012-08-20
People can get very upset over the most trivial of things, no level of richness or success will change that.
1 tilfordkage 2012-08-20
I honestly don't know if any writers were approached or not, but there were definitely a few directors approached.
0 BadgerGecko 2012-08-20
The article contain no facts whatsoever regarding this as a conspiracy the closest it comes to saying anything different
This merely a biog of his cinematic history.
There are more pressing matter concerning us like Assange at the moment.....