So many t_donald shills so scared that the Russian story might be true, so they spam this sub with SETH RICH posts. Okay we get it, he was murdered, the DNC probably did it. There are so many connections between Trump and the Russia mafia though, but Oh no let's not look at that.

0  2017-08-02 by [deleted]

[deleted]

44 comments

lol you were one of the people who posted a seth rich story earlier today

does the thing "I HATE WHEN PEOPLE DO THAT THING"

Hey at least you are conceding the DNC probably murdered the guy.

That's a white flag if I've ever seen one tbh.

I'm almost certain they murdered the guy. I'm also not a leftist .

Clinton and Wasserman can burn in hell

Wikileaks just released audio from Seymour Hersh confirming that the DNC didn't murder him. It was a robbery gone wrong.

How can Hersh confirm this? Was he there? Has he found the missing body cam or cctv footage? Or located the killer?

Stop with the misleading cherry picked tidbits of information.

He's an investigative journalist who's won Pulitzer awards for breaking stories like the Mai Lai massacre. He's very credible. If he says he knows something, I believe him.

Except he didn't say this. You are putting words in his mouth.

He did, right at the start of the tape. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giuZdBAXVh0

"he wasn't murdered because of what he knew...he was living in a very rough neighbourhood..and in that exact area there are a lot of violent robberies, most of them with somebody brandishing a gun"

Way to mis-quote him.

Those are literal quotes from the audio file.

Try again. Listen carefully.

He did not confirm any of this, he is speculating. He said "I don't think he was..." not "he was not..."

He confirmed Seth was the leaker, he didn't solve the murder case.

He didn't confirm Seth was the leaker, he was just repeating rumour that he'd heard.

No, he's citing an FBI report.

You have just about everything he said backwards.

He said he hasn't seen the report, he's just repeating what someone else said to him.

I am willing to believe Trump is not what he claims to be AND I am willing to accept the DNC murdered Seth Rich.

Exactly

Well said

7 Hersh posts on the front page. 14 "Seth rich was murdered by the DNC" posts.

One or 2 copies of the story will do, fellas.

More posts are better. Have you seen the mega threads in r\politics. They are so big no conversations take place.

Woah, an admission that DNC probably did it, I assume an admission that he was a leaker. So we have an actual crime, and lies which were utilized to justify foreign policy decisions, wasted how much tax money for bullshit investigations, shows that the Clinton's are corrupt, but Trump has 'connections'. How ominous sounding.

OP you are distracting by mentioning Russia but not Israel or Soros.

The left is falling. It is glorious.

I mean, is it though? Outliers tend to think so, but it appears to the masses as if the right is the one crumbling to the ground.

Glad I'm not part of the left

Give. It. Up.

You're either sincere in your beliefs, which is terrifying, or you're intentionally spreading a false narrative to obfuscate the reality of the events unfolding right now. Also terrifying but in a much more sad way.

Would not surprise me that Trump laundered/invested money from Russian mob. Think a lot of Wall Street and banks have done so and will continue to do so despite sanctions (use subsidiary banks in other countries and all the other tax avoidance schemes that are created for the rich and multinationals cocompanies).

Wouldn't surprise me Trump also laundered/invested money from the American Sicilian Mafia early on in his career.

Worse I have no doubt Trump laundered/invested money from CIA tools/assets Adnan Khashoggi and Imelda Marcos. No doubt some of these two person's money would be U.S. citizens tax money and probable reason little coverage about Trump laundering Russian mob money been given as investigations of Trump's past business dealings. This is because any investigation will lead to questions about his connections to these people, their income streams, and their connection to CIA guilt and culpability.

So instead of these credible, easily evidence-aquired through public records, and concerning facts about Trump being investigated, we have MSM going on about the circumstantial evidence of the Russian hack of United States election. I'm tired off media presenters spinning the allegations of anonymous sources (amounts to hearsay and gossip), top secret dossiers that only politicians can look at (Iraq WMDs style), an unverified private company's report from crowdstrike (while the DNC withholds its servers from the FBI), and stupid gossip dossiers as being solid verifiable evidence and proof of Russian interference in U.S.election.

Just because Trump accepted Russian Mob money in selling his real estate does not prove that Russia meddled in the election. It's a bow, but a long one and a dangerous one.

Russia and USA are countries that can burn the world by themselves, and a confrontation between the two would double the chance of this outcome. I do not want my world burnt on unsubstantiated allegations that turn out no be no more then another Iraq WMDs lie.

As for Seth Rich no one knows the truth as no one has been arrested and convicted for his murder yet. So saying the DNC hadn't any involvement is speculation as much as anyone saying the DNC is involved. Legitimate and registered companies like the DNC have been known to have been involved in murders before, either unwittingly or wittingly (as paying thugs to beat striking workers) and so such an occurrence is not unknown.

Edited for grammer

I'll be very interested in the evidence when and if it is ever presented. Sincerely. The only person who has been willing to embrace that theory in public is James Comey. The only public evidence is the letter that Trump's kid leaked on himself. All of the other endless articles have been anonymously sourced by spooks. The very first mention of it came from material provided by an mi6 alumnus and was exposed to the world by Guccifer 2.0, who had physical access to DNC computers. All of that is true and now WikiLeaks has inched even closer to naming Seth Rich as a source by bringing attention to something that Sy Hersh said.

And here you come to save us from our ignorance.

Do you watch the hearings?

Nope. I parse the data. As I've told you every time we've spoken, your narrative is crap. Now it seems that we have reached Seth Rich day. What is your plan?

Didn't realize we spoke before. Sorry if I forgot our conversations.

Did I tell you last time that the intelligence comittee said that there was thousands of hacks and not just the DNC's?

And I have no plan. I just enjoy talking about this conspiracy and debating it.

They are spooks. They tell lies. It is the thing that they do best. The lying has now become a threat to Free Speech, The Free Press, and Fair Elections so we are going to have a public reckoning. Fairly routine civic maintenance that we have put off for too long.

Sure, you may believe as you wish.

But, if we're going by what the intelligence communities say, even if Seth Rich leaked the emails and there was no DNC hack by Russia, it still doesn't account for the thousands of other hacks done by the GRU.

So, I'm glad that people are trying to find out who killed Seth Rich. But, those who push it just because they think it debunks the Russian conspiracy, are in for a rough time no matter what happens.

I don't know what kind of fake news do you read but the version I've heard of the story, they said there was hack attempts, none of them was successful.

And to make things even better, out there is an organization that is trying to make malware look like it was made by Russians while it was done by someone who clearly doesn't speak Russian as his first language.

Here is some article on it. There have been floating around this kind of articles for a long time, written by sources that are not Fox nor CNN. https://www.theverge.com/2017/6/28/15888632/petya-goldeneye-ransomware-cyberattack-ukraine-russia

From your article:

The broader political context makes Russia a viable suspect. Russia has been engaged in active military interventions in Ukraine since former president Viktor Yanukovych was removed from power in 2014. That has included the annexation of Crimea and the active movement of troops and equipment in the eastern region of the country, but also a number of more subtle activities. Ukraine’s power grid came under cyberattack in December 2015, an attack many interpreted as part of a hybrid attack by Russia against the country’s infrastructure. That hybrid-warfare theory extends to more conventional guerrilla attacks: the same day that Petya ripped through online infrastructure, Ukrainian colonel Maksim Shapoval was killed by a car bomb attack in Kiev.

March 20 Intelligence Hearing:

HURD: Good copy. And do you have a ball park of the number of private sector entities that you have to notify of these types of breaches?

COMEY: Hundreds and thousands. In this particular case we had to notify hundreds, I think maybe more than 1,000 entities that the Russians were hitting at the same time.

HURD: Admiral Rogers, do you have anything to add to that?

ROGERS: No, because as we pass the information to the FBI, what started all this was a pretty massive effort on the part of our Russian counterparts.

They have tons of evidence. Yet they still have nothing to show. Ok.

What do you think the House and Senate Intelligence committees actually do?

And I just proved to you it's not fake news, so you're moving on to another strategy

Uhh, no. You didn't prove anything. Anyone can tell lies. It's been over 7 months and they still have absolutely nothing to show.

What do you think the House and Senate Intelligence committees actually do?

Why do you think they have nothing to show us?

What do you think the House and Senate Intelligence committees actually do?

Answer the question.

Its funny you say mafia. I can think of a certain recent white house wiseguy that got canned for running his mouth.

But aren't you equally distracting from the recent Seth Rich wikilleaks connections?

Look donald trump is not clean.
But he is still a better pick as hillary.
If only to rampage through the white house like a baboon.
Or for the public to make a FUCK U statement.
Its still better as hillary (till he launches nuke,s then fuck him)

Kinda like you can smell it your so close.

Boohoo

Surely you see the difference between a man who was clearly murdered for doing something that at the time was viewed as potentially fatal to a presidential campaign and a ratings-fueled quest for revenge on a guy who humiliated the media to the point where I haven't even bothered to turn the tv on in months

WAAAAAAAAAAA, we thought we could take over r/conspiracy with our shill brigade and fake news, waaaaaaaaaaa

Since when did these fucks start giving a flying Fuck about a Dnc staffer? Like, are they trying to obviously deflect from the Russia investigation or what? LOL hilarious that they think they're so smart. I'm literally giggling.

They are spooks. They tell lies. It is the thing that they do best. The lying has now become a threat to Free Speech, The Free Press, and Fair Elections so we are going to have a public reckoning. Fairly routine civic maintenance that we have put off for too long.

How can Hersh confirm this? Was he there? Has he found the missing body cam or cctv footage? Or located the killer?

Stop with the misleading cherry picked tidbits of information.